Comments on: Noooo! Latest polls in South Carolina: Newt on top

By: w. Parker

w. Parker — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:21:00 +0000

What makes no sense are “Conscientious Objectors” as yourself…You are in the military but believe in R Paul’s policies? You are a detrement and dangerous to others in uniform. Knowing you could or would be sent into a war zone (one which you disagree with), why did you join? Doesn’t all R Paul supporters disagree with our involvement in any war outside american borders? What would you do if you were asked to fight in S Korea, europe, elsewhere in the middle east? you also speak as if you have access to CIA classified documents that explain the thoughts of people of the entire country of Pakistan. Or, have you polled everyone there. You claim to be so informed, have you dismissed the possibility of an iranian nuke being smuggled into america, or do you have info that that is an impossibility…I support our military as i was a war veteran but you seem to be in conflict with your own ideology as to be a serviceman and R Paul supporter. i would not feel comfortable sharing the same foxhole with someone who didn’t feel he was right being there in the first place. aren’t all R Paul supports in the military basically conscientious objectors in uniform??????

By: w. Parker

w. Parker — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:00:00 +0000

You said you are in the military? Why did you join if you support R Paul and agree with his policies? For the money? What would you do if you were sent into Iran to destroy the Nuke facility – disobey orders? Are you not a conscientious objector in disguise? or do you speak out of both sides of your mouth, doing one thing but saying another? i am all for the military and the troops as i was one once, but if you are not in for the right reason, believing you are furthering america’s best interest, aren’t you putting fellow servicemen at risk? would you obey orders if asked to defend S Korea, isreal, england, etc? If you would, wouldn’t that conflict with your beliefs toward r paul?

By: w. Parker

w. Parker — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:41:00 +0000

Exactly, and what did Eisenhower do – let the Russians take Berlin, just at master Paulbot is letting Iran have the nuke

By: w. Parker

w. Parker — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:38:00 +0000

Heard of the War Powers Act? It’s legal

By: w. Parker

w. Parker — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:35:00 +0000

Waste your vote then. You Paulbots just don’t get it and everyone of you have the same scripted statements as if ya’ll are all on some spell. If i disagree with you, then I”m in with Chris Mathews? Come one, can you come with something better than that stupid statement??

By: w. Parker

w. Parker — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:28:00 +0000

Hey, you ignorant jackass, i have fought in war before, how about you? You are as pathetic as your stupid screen name.. an immature, know-it-all brainwashed paulbot. you are a punk and coward. What are you going to do about it??

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:38:00 +0000

SandyLester; so you are implying that the President does not need Congressional approval to declare war legally? How so?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:03:00 +0000

I’ve loved you Glenn since I first day I discovered you on CNN but I’ve been a Newt fan since he was our awesome Speaker and accomplished what most said was impossible. Your vetting argument would be stronger against Newt if you could attack Newt’s Signature legislation, policy or procedures. I’m not talking about the go along to get along got-ya moments all effective politicians have on their resume. I’m talking about the Newt Gingrich SIGNATURE issues that he pushed and passed. In my opinion, what a man does far out weighs what a man says, that’s why you Glenn have been forgiven for some of the thing that have come out of your mouth over the years.

By: Randy Mason

Randy Mason — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:40:00 +0000

Newt and Santorum failed to get on the ballot in severl states, losing 550 delegates, they have 0 chance of getting the 1154 required, Ron Paul has been doing good with delegates, see you at the convention in August

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:56:00 +0000

So the reason Ron Paul’s clothes don’t fit is because it’s not in the Constitution?