The war on Progressivism is now in the final end game; this year it will be win or lose for the nation to either win free and restore the power to the people, or we slide into communism or facism. It is that simple.

In the case of Gingrich calling Glenn a liar, Glenn has played Newts own words, unaltered and clear for all to hear in which Newt condemns himself and is caught in a clear set of lies and self spoken contradictions.

Look to the articles here at the sight from yesterday; hear Newts own words and then you make up your own mind. Let the truth stand on its own.

So Glenn, you don’t attack Romney because we all know he is a big govt. guy.  But when he was leading in  the polls I guess you were O.K. if he gets the nomination but not Newt?  Strange. Of course you’re not going to defend Romney and 2 minutes later you start making excuses for him.  How obviously one sided. Newt or Mitt equals me voting 3rd party.

I have long feared what could finally take down Glenn Beck would not be the liberals or progressives,but it would be the conservatives. This whole debate over Gingrich, Romney and who is conservative has exposed this. Not because what Glenn is saying is untrue but it is because we as conservatives are all for telling the truth and all for exposing corruption when it is the opposition but when we find the corruption in our own house we refuse to expose our own progressives. If the truth truly has no agenda regardless of opinion what happens conservatives when our guy gets in( whether it is Gingrich, Romney,or Santorum) and Glenn starts to expose the  progressive corruption or mistakes of our candidate will we say he is a sell out?, a closet Liberal?, a traitor?, Is that really the case or are we just hypocrites seeking to cast the beam out of our brothers eye without removing the mote in our own? Here is the cold hard truth- If we as conservatives TRULY believe in the constitution and the framework our founders instituted and we reject totally over reaching nanny state big government, progressive ism,Socialism, and Marxism in all its forms then one CANNOT in honesty condemn one person for implementing those Ideals while supporting a candidate whose actions and record support the same position. This is why (While we have a choice) Gingrich, Romney, and Paul are all progressives. Their records show one big government, progressive underlying tone in much of their decisions. For example
Conservative position- A health care law mandate on citizens is unconstitutional and the federal government has no right to implement or force any such action.
Newt Gingrich- Supported and has never renounced his support for a Health care mandate. Did oppose Obama and Hillary care but not the mandate of it as recently as 2008.(Mitt Romney state plan served as model for Obama care)
Mitt Romney- Implemented State health care. Although constitutionally legal at the state level a true conservative would never implement such a intrusive governmental authority into peoples lives ( Newt is the same on the Dept of education-a decision that should belong to the states).
Rick Santorum- Supported Arlen Specter and supported earmarks and pork. (Although his argument for doing such is truly constitutional and admits that the process has been sorely abused.)
Ron Paul copied Orin Hatch in voting and opposing earmarks and pork while loading bills chalk full of the stuff  while “Playing the Game”.  can you say Hypocrites.
We as conservatives have to ask ourselves which is the better choice in this case but Glenn is correct to point out that these are not true constitutional conservative actions or people (Especially when they espouse the role models and policies that have brought us to the brink of destruction). So Tea party, and conservatives are we truly for the constitution or are we nothing more than progressive lite hypocrites who decided to take the train to Hell rather than the Concord? The Founders would say turn the Hell around and head in the opposite direction. Just to let you all know why Glenn is right and that his pointing out of warning signs and condemnation of progressive-ism in whom ever it appears is correct. It is because I AM A PROGRESSIVE. Everything the left is corrupting and controlling in regards to politics, religion,  food, morality,marriage, all of it if you take an atheistic, evolutionary stance is Logically sound. I will expound upon this another time. Suffice it to say though why do I identify as a conservative because I First and foremost know that their is an eternal Judge and standard of right and Wrong (ie God) and that my rights come from such a source not MAN or governments. I also know the ultimate conclusion of the progressive path and the misery it will cause. Therefore I REJECT  PROGRESSIVISM’s Social tinkering. Best example is Whoopie Goldeberg. The average Leftist thinks much like her that The philosophy is good on paper but hasn’t worked because of the Human element But she still Hopes. What she is ignorant of and what the founders understood is not that her idea hasn’t been implement ed right or with the right person it is because the model she espouses is flawed and corrupted at the root and that NO ONE IS the right person. The founders understood that there is always someone willing to go further down the path to hell than you (Something Whoopi does not understand) and it is often paved with good intentions. The answer the founders discovered is the only way to avoid this is not to go down the road at all but pick a different road. Therefore I am conservative because you can’t build a just utopia on a foundation of lies and deceit. You can’t Champion human rights while trampling on others rights you oppose.You can’t give Godlike power and authority to a Man or government before it starts to act like one. You can’t have justice in a system where different rules and laws create different outcome. (Hence Justice is Blind). You can’t seek for riches while steeling them from others. Social Justice is another name for no Justice. So Conservatives does the truth have no agenda? You will have to decide.

I never thought I would see the Day where Glenn actively tries to get Obama re-elected.  THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT GLENN IS DOING BY TRYING TO DESTROY THE ONLY CANDIDATE WHO CAN  BEAT OBAMA GLENN IS CONTRIBUTING TO OBAMA’S RE-ELECTION!!!

DISGRACEFUL!!

Yes, it is the truth. It is unelectabel, and i am going to show you how it really works. With my saying this, you can continue sailing smoothly. Earlier you wanted the attacks. Have you heard of any problems gaining momentum with that? You have 90 seconds to think it in order. Just use your brain. I do not have any personal watch, so i will do it over my lunch time too. And by the way, no personal carretta. Though it might be a fine position, i do not want to downplay your mental activity.  Believe me, there IS a reason. It is in there…and  i want you,guys, to have that kind of power. Why? Because we are AMERICAN PEOPLE! ….And it is not only my position or my progesteron de facto. It is very and weary personal. It is de jure. And this is how it really works.
Lusey, kisa….over my healthy body….

Snowleopard, they still let commies on this site?  ”The War on Progressivism is now in the final endgame”.  WHAT??  The WAR as you call it has been put on the American people since the Founders by “Progressives” that believe that free markets are evil, people are stupid, and that an elite few must control and regulate all the affairs of the people.

EVERY nation in the history of the world that went the “progressive” way, progressed to death, destruction, massive poverty, and MILLIONS killed by their own government, and a complete collapse of the means of bounty, the productive capacity of the nation.

Obama and the previous progressives in the White House, Congress, and the Senate have for the past fifty years been implementing a detailed plan devised by Alinsky.  Cloward and Pivens contributed to the progressive cause and not only outlined exactly what needed to be done to collapse America and turn it into a socialist nation, but then went and spent the rest of their lives working to make it happen.

Skousen, in his 1958 book THE NAKED COMMUNIST outlined the communist plan which included 50 action items that must happen to make it all come to pass.  Right now, 47 of the 50 have been clearly attained, while the other three are well on the way.

No, Snowleopard, the WAR has been on the Constitution, on FREEDOM, on Personal Responsibility, on Family, and on Christianity for at least fifty years.  Your war on Progressivism is a figment of your fevered imagination.  

But thanks for checking in.

Okay I’m a progressive myself and I disagree with practically everything Gingrich supports. This idea that Gingrich is a progressive is ridiculous. What’d he do that’s progressive? Sit on a couch with Pelosi? Romney was vocal about climate change too. Support a healthcare mandate? Romney instituted one. If Gingrich is a progressive then Romney has to be one too (I don’t remember Gingrich saying he’d be more liberal on gay rights than Ted Kennedy or trying to uphold Roe vs Wade).

Could it be that Newt is not a Mormon??   Just asking.

Use to like Glenn but he is a one trick pony.

Amen, well said.

As a support of Glenn over the years, I now find that this is one issue where I disagree with his positon on Newt.  May I submit the following article by Dr. Thomas Sowell (from TownHall.com) which I think provides an alternate perspective and worth considering!  Please take the time to read; then you decide.”Just days before the South Carolina primary,
polls showed Mitt Romney leading Newt Gingrich. Then came the debates and the
question about Gingrich’s private life, which brought a devastating response
from the former Speaker of the House — and a standing ovation from the
audience.

Apparently the television audience felt the same way,
judging by the huge turnaround in the support for Gingrich. The stunning victory
in South Carolina brought Newt’s candidacy back to life.
But the message from South Carolina was about more than a
reaction to how Gingrich dealt with a cheap shot question from the media. Nor
was it simply the Republican voters’ response to Newt’s mastery as a
debater.
The more fundamental message is that the Republican primary
voters do not want Mitt Romney, even if the Republican establishment does — and
it is just a question of which particular conservative alternative the voters
prefer.
The successive boomlets for Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry and
Herman Cain showed the Republican voter’s constant search for somebody —
anybody — as an alternative to Romney. The splintering of the conservative vote
among numerous conservative candidates allowed Romney to be the “front-runner,”
but he never ran far enough in front to get a majority.
Mitt Romney’s supposed “electability” — his acceptability
to moderates and independents — has been his biggest selling point. Moreover,
he is just the kind of candidate that the Republican establishment has preferred
for years: a nice, bland, moderate who offends nobody.
This is the kind of candidate that is supposed to be the key
to victory, no matter how many such candidates have gone down to defeat. If the
bland and inoffensive moderate was in fact the key to victory, Dewey would have
won a landslide victory over Truman in 1948, and John McCain would have beaten
Barack Obama in 2008.
Whomever the Republicans choose as their candidate is going
to have to run against both Barack Obama and the pro-Obama media. Newt Gingrich
has shown that he can do that. Romney? Not so much. Mitt Romney’s fumbling when
trying to answer the simple question of whether he would or would not release
his income tax records is the kind of indecisiveness that is not going to cut it
in a nationally televised debate with President Obama.
Gingrich is not just a guy who is fast and feisty on his
feet. He has a depth of understanding of what issues are crucial, experience in
how to deal with them and — almost equally important — experience in how to
shoot down the petty, irrelevant and “gotcha” distractions of the
media.
Does Gingrich have negative qualities? More than most. Wild
statements, alienation of colleagues, reckless gambits. His use of the rhetoric
of the left in attacking Bain Capital was a recent faux pas, though one that he
quickly backed away from.
But if we are serious — and there has seldom, if ever, been
a time in the history of this nation when it was more necessary to be serious —
then we cannot simply add up talking points for or against a candidate. What
matters is how that candidate stands on issues that can make or break the future
of this country.
Polls show the public as a whole with more negative
attitudes toward Gingrich than toward Romney. But negative opinions, like other
opinions, are not set in stone.
If the election campaign changes the opinions of a
significant minority of the anti-Gingrich voters — when the alternative is
Obama — it will not matter how much the remainder may hate Newt.
Is this a gamble? The painful reality is that everyone in
this year’s field of Republican candidates is a gamble. And re-electing Barack
Obama is an even bigger gamble.
Whichever candidate the Republican voters finally choose
from this year’s field, they are bound to have reservations, if not fears.
Gingrich’s worst could be worse than Romney’s worst, both as a candidate and as
a president. But Gingrich’s best is much better than Romney’s best.
Sometimes caution can be carried to the point where it is
dangerous. When the Super Bowl is on the line, you don’t go with the quarterback
who is least likely to throw an interception. You go with the one most likely to
throw a touchdown pass.”

Coulter had it right yesterday when she said to look at the disgraced former speaker (my phrase) and Calista together.  Do you really think American is ready for them as the First Couple (I paraphrased)? The answer is obvious to most!!  Imus also made some cogennt points this morning.  My question of the day for parents (following Gov. Romney’s release of his tax returns) is this:  Would you want your kids to grow up to be like the governor, or Newt Gingrich? I think the answer, again, is obvious to most!!

What a cheap shot (disgraced former speaker-like)!

I think most real conservatives understand that neither Romney or Gingrich are one of us. What I don’t understand is why all the attacks on Gingrich, but not on Romney. Is Glenn endorsing Romney simply by relentlessly attacking Newt only? I can’t help but think that is what he is doing. Otherwise, why not slam all the progressives and endorse a real conservative even if you think they can’t win?

Hi Glenn,

If I could wave a magic wand, my choice for the next President of the U.S.A. would be:

                                GENERAL  DAVID PETRAEUS

Bob Bornschein
Palm City, Florida

When did this become a two man race? This is the first leg Newt has won and he isn’t even on the ballot in a few states. It ain’t over til the fat lady sings. At this stage in the primaries they were still calling Reagan unelectable.

So who the heck to we vote for then? If all the leading candidates are progressives, then what are we to do? I’d like to know who Glenn recommends in this pickle.

Rick Santorum.

Maybe Newt is not 100% conservative but he’s still 100% better than Barak Obama – and if he’s nominated I’m voting for him.

Excuse me? If you think Newt can get elected in a general election you are a very sad man… Newt would get slaughtered. Mitt has absolutely no dirt in his closet. The only stuff anyone can every bring up about Mitt is his “flip flop” (if you really must call it that) on life and guns and Romney Care, all of which are getting to be rather old news and Romney has done a fairly good job (though I admit I wish he’d develop more passion in his speech) explaining these things. Newt is absolutely nothing that he says he is. His past is so dirty, so complicated, so dark… and no one really likes the guy. His popularity is lower than Mitt and Obama combined! When it comes time to vote in the general election Obama will take all of the middle, just like last time. Newt will not and CAN not win. So a vote for Newt is a vote for OBABA!!!

I am distressed that you picture Newt as leaving Congress in shame without illustrating the background of his departure.  For instance, the fact that the Democrats were filing on charge after another (I believe in excess on 30) to keep the press and public in a stew as whether he is honest or not.  How many charges stuck and what was the one that did?  Did you mention how he accomplishing what he did: he made many of his associates distressed by the cutbacks in pork and facing up to the results thereof in perceived “good old boy” backroom deals, etc.  I have all of your books and admire you highly but, on this you are not “fair and balanced.”

Funny… only one candidate recently supported gun control (raised taxes on guns 400%), was pro-abortion, and is being backed by big business and the establishment who want nothing but more of the same… and that’s Romney.

Gingrich, on the other hand, led the House to the first Republican majority in modern history, balanced the budget and ran a surplus EVERY year he was in charge, and passed major welfare entitlement reform working against a Democratic Senate and President. That didn’t make him a lot of friends in Washington (as you can tell)… but he got the job done. 

And now Glenn want’s us to believe that he’s the progressive? 

I see no indication that Romney is any less a progressive than Newt. I like Ron Paul, but feel he goes too far in withdrawing our military forces. I will vote for the Republican nominee. In the primary I may vote for Ron Paul as a protest. 

If he is nominated I will vote for him, too… That said, I pray he is NOT the nominee.

Vote Santorum. He’s not progressive. He’s a leading candidate. Paul isn’t leading.. He hasn’t even won an election yet. Santorum won one, making him just as much in the race as Romney or Gingrich.

How is Paul a progressive?

This is not the time for nitpicking ALL the candidates….I’m, sick of it…  We have had a major destructive force in the White House for three years, and if we don’t unite and vote ABO , ANYBODY BUT OBAMA, then we might as well vote for Obama himself.  United, we must be united no matter who the candidate is, because if we aren’t the next four years of Obama will be hell… Amd those of you who are saying that you just won’t vote if your guy doesn’t win the GOP nomination, or you’re going to write in your candidate….you, in effect, will be voting for Obama….and you will deserve what happens in the next four years……. but I and my family do not….

What makes you think Gingrich can beat Obama? Because he’s a trenchant debater? I don’t have a lot of hope for either Gingrich or Romney against Obama; both are visages of the past running against someone who pretends to be about the future.

Could you just not like Romney because he’s mormon?

Right. If he’s nominated I vote for him because voting for whoever the GOP pukes up is the best chance to unseat Obama. But I’m not going to pretend that Gingrich represents the conservative worldview. The best conservative voices in the party were driven out in the early primaries. We are left with yesterday’s oatmeal.

And how is his past more destructive to us than Obama????   Quite frankly, I couldn’t care less how many times he has been married or what the problem is….the ethics charge was DROPPED, and the Republican establishment is protecting their turf in congress by criticizing Newt.  Get over it…at least with Newt and these candidates they will abide by the legislative process and not rule by executive order…Get rid of Obama and his henchmen….that is the goal, not finding the perfect candidate…doesn’t exist

Romney hired Charlie Crist and his minions to run his campaign in Florida.  Need we say more?  Yes, this is the Obama hugging party switching Crist who tried everything to beat Rubio and still got his head handed to him.  Newt is not perfect, but he has a spine and can stand up to Obama and Romney is a milk toast RINO.  Having said that, either one is 1000% better than Oblama.

I predict that Glenn will gradually and incrementally start making less sense, become more disconnected from Reality, and worst of all, believe his own hyperventilated conclusions drawn out of static forms and constructs.

He taught us all a lot, exposed subversion and treason, set the historical record straight, but now, like a once working engine, is sputtering and misfiring.  Alas, Alas!

The danger in the success that Glenn has had, with so many praises and popularity, is the insularity from counter opinions and challenges on beliefs as facts.

As the old expression goes: ” His head might be getting too big”.

Unless you can dump Congress, the Supreme Court and make the president a dictator, Glenn would never be able to achieve the Utopia he speaks of.  Even if he were president, himself.  Speaking awful of everyone in politics does no one any good. Change must come in small increments because of how far we have gone towards the dark side.   We look to Glenn to be a sobering voice for us to consider as we make our choices. He has given us no choices.  Thanks alot, Glenn.  I will do my own history check and leave all the talking points in the trash heap.
I know alot about who my vote will go to, no thanks to you.

I RESPECT YOU, GLENN, AND FOLLOW YOU FAITHFULLY. BUT I THINK YOU NEED TO GIVE A LITTLE ON THIS TOPIC. WE KNOW WHERE YOU ARE COMING FROM, BUT THERE ARE TIMES WHEN WE REALLY NEED TO STEP BACK JUST A BIT. IN ANY CASE, I’M ROOTING FOR SANTORUM BUT IF NEWT WINDS UP AS CANDIDATE, HE GETS MY VOTE. (JOHN GACY AND CHARLES MANSON WOULD GET MY VOTE IF THEY WERE RUNNING AGAINST OBAMA.) 

We need a 2 term President to correct the 3 years of destruction Obama has made and continues this day to usurp the Constitution and blindside Congress to ram his socialist Marxist trash down the throats of We the People.  Ron Paul at 76 will only be one term and thus not electable.  He scares me on foreign policy or lack thereof and to me not my pick.  Sorry Ronulans…we must look at a 2 term President and I daresay Ron Paul is not your guy for office.  Mitt? Newt? definitley not Santorum unless he somehow finds the golden egg and  connects fast with the mainstream anti-Obama Americans.  Newt does scare me on the global warming farce and has embraced the liar and climate crook Al Gore and bilge water witch of Pelosi.  We do not need a Wilsonian Progressive in office with Newt.  Love his debates and his Reaganist speak…but he does not walk the talk and that turns me off.  Wow…is it Mitt who is endorsed by my beloved conservative warrior Ann Coulter?  Perhaps.  Down the wire, it will be the Anyone But Obama vote and I believe mainstream Americans will vote that way.    Truth be told then…I will vote the GOP candidate to unseat the Obama Marxist regime.

Is it possible to seek redemption for ones progressive ways, it does seem that Newt is trying to find his way, we all learn, he has proved factually that he can slow down government growth, he did in the 90s, it has taken since 1913 to get America this far out of control constitutionally, you can not turn it around over night, it will take time. Newt is saying the things I need to hear right now, the Contract with America was brilliant in its time, he has led the Republicans to victory more times than I can count in the right direction. He seems to want to do the right thing, is there Mr. or Ms. perfect out there? I do not see it, but I do see people trying to take America in a direction that was unthinkable just 4 years ago.

Newt is no different than Romney.  Both of them are no different from Obama except for the fact that they would move more slowly toward the same goal than Obama.  The answer is not Obama, Romney, Gingrich or Paul.  Except for Paul, they are all Progressives.  Progressivism is a cancer that’s destroying our country.  Their goal is to get rid of the Constitution because it’s the only thing standing in the way of Progressives implementing their one-world government (at least, according to George Soros).  Paul, though not a Progressive, has some dangerous ideas, especially when it comes to foreign relations.  My preference is that the Republicans have an open convention so someone else can be nominated.  If that can’t happen, then the only candidate remaining that I could truly get behind is Santorum.  Personally, although I’m a Tea Party member, I just can’t understand how Tea Partiers could possibly support Romney or Gingrich.  I’ll give them a pass on Paul.

I don’t care – -got it – -I don’t care.  It doesn’t matter who it is, you have something to say about all of them. Have you checked out the liberal policies that Mr. Romney had in Massachusetts – really, Glenn. If you would read all about those charges BY THE DEMOCRATS – he was cleared of all but one and that one wasn’t even worth the charge.  He who is without sin, let him cast the first stone… you are getting on everyone’s last nerve so do we care who you endorse – NOT. Why? because you are negative about everyone… I want Mr. Santorum but he is not going to get the nomination and I definitely don’t want Ron Paul – who is a lunatic, Mr. Romney doesn’t prove any conservative values. He talks a good talk (like John McCain) so the only one that had the contract for America that I certainly supported during that time is Mr. Newt. Mitt Romney raised taxes, he was pro-abortion, he was for mandated HealthCare .  What is wrong with you?  

Can we be honest for once.  What pres. candidate in the last quarter or perhaps longer had the character and integrity of Gov. Romney?  A lovely family and the works!!!!  Some must have expected him to pass a Right to Work law in MA, with the legislature 85% Democratic.  Please!  Look at his wealth.  Every American should applaud him.  He didn’t inherit a dime!  What a success story to share with our children!!!!!!!!

You give Gingrich the credit for the congress’ actions. They all hated Newt and it was the overwhelming, anti-democratic sentiment that got republicans in. Read any account and all they talk about is Newt trying to get them to back off the budget, back off the abortion, back off everything that made the republicans great in that time. Newt is NOT CONSERVATIVE! The “establishment,” half of which were put in by the tea party, have been very vocal about Romney not being their first choice, but is the best choice. Try seeing things through the eyes of an independent, and you’ll see Romney is the only one that can bring them in. If Newt gets the nomination, then I hope the republican party goes extinct. Maybe then we can start over and at least try maintain some of our integrity. As for the surgeon, being a doctor, I can tell you that you don’t want a doctor who can’t keep his personal life in order working on your brain. Or perhaps you’ve already made that mistake.

Imagine if the Democrats fielded a candidate with as much baggage as Newt has….we’d be apoplectic!  And justifiably so.  Newt’s the debate champion, for sure, but that and a dollar won’t even get you a soda most places.  I love Newt’s style in the debate format and he is a font of witty sound bites, but I doubt those will win him votes against the Campaigner-in-Chief.  Wish I could get fired up about any of them……Conservatives MUST gain control of the Senate, then it will matter less which GOP is in the Oval Office. 

God’s will be done no matter who is elected.  That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t care or vote.. vote your conscience then watch the will of God unfold.  It will be awesome!!  Would love to hear feedback from anyone who has read (or listened to the author of) The Harbinger by Jonathan Cahn.

Ummmmm, you’re kidding me, right? If it were about religion, Glenn Beck would be openly supporting Mitt Romney. But he isn’t. Beck openly admits that Romney is NOT his first choice.

There is no perfect candidate out there.  The elite Republican Establishment want Romney so bad they can taste it.  However, he is a milk toast with a weak spine and unable to call the Pretender in Chief a Socialist.  At least Newt has a spine and will not be run over.  Whatever his baggage in the past, Newt is the brightest of the bunch and can head Obama his head in a debate.  When he is elected, we can bring him along on the issues people have a problem with.

I am not a glen beck fan but after listening to those that call themselves fans I surprised they don’t agree with glen on gingrich for he is not a conservative, never has been and would say anything to get elected but to turn on glen for wanting no more progressives in the whitehouse and gingrich is just that, mccain, ronmeny, and gingrich are all obama’s boys and the government elitist have fooled you all. So Glen I am in your corner on this for I am also a Ron Paul Fan and always will be for the constitution and freedom, liberty, smaller government, no spending, balancing the budget, bringing the troops home, are my goals, and this means everything to me and all of the Ron Paul supporters, and now we fing we are at least protecting glen beck’s back! This is our nation for all of us to stand up and stand together to protect it!

right on!!

A typical Democratic tactic is to use appearances as a reason to dislike a person. I love Coulter and Imus but, you really have to use some discretion with both.  I believe that Romney is not up to the task of transforming the current corruption in DC in that it will almost certainly ruin the person making the attempt.

Newt has a tendency to verbalize any idea that comes to mind. That doesn’t change the absolute fact that under his leadership the republican party gained gained control of the House for the first time in many decades, and achieved great gains in conservative policy, even while under a liberal Democrat president. Name one thing that any of the other three candidates have accomplished that comes even a close second. Talk is cheap, let’s see who has given us results.

Mitt said Globe Warming is man made a few years ago.Why is JC Watts & Chuck Norris backing Newt is he is so bad? He also got a lot of good things done went he was in office.

“Newt Gingrich- Supported and has never renounced his support for a Health care mandate.”

Then what is stating that the Health Care Mandate is clearly unconstitutional if not a repudiation of his position? (see: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/video/gingrich-individual-mandate-unconstitutional-15073261) I would rather have someone who is at least moving his positions in the right direction rather than, for example, Romney, who has never repudiated his positions on the Massachusetts health care law.

Just read your friends who are commenting, Mr. Beck.  You are going too far. I totally agree with Tennesse75, ronwagn, Mark, trevallic, TrueValues, Shelby. We have to vote or it is a vote for Obama and if Rick Santorum  doesn’t get the nomination then we must settle for one of the other two, Newt or Romney (and I do not want Romney after reading his record)

So Newt’s 15 year building of GOPAC and the Contract with America… which was indisputably the reason and foundation for all the above… was just a ruse… and had nothing to do with the Republican majority? 

And once in as Speaker, he actively worked against all the above? And shutting down government to force Clinton’s hand was not his idea either? If you expect people to believe that, perhaps you need to have a brain scan.

OK, so what do we do? Herman Cain, Michelle Bachman, and Sarah Palin are great conservatives but they are no longer in the race. I would vote for any one of them in a heartbeat. Rick Santorum is a great candidate and I will back him to the hilt as a good conservative choice. However, Rick may not make it to the final winner’s circle. That leaves Newt and Mitt. Unless someone else steps up, we have no other candidates. We can bash them all we want (and I have reservations with both, and don’t agree with them on everything), but they are better by any measurement you want to measure than another 4 years of Obama? Would I vote for Newt or Mitt over Obama? Absolutely…..that’s a no brainer. Will our country be better off 4 years later with either Newt or Mitt than with Obama? Maybe not perfect, but better off? Absolutely!!

  Confusing stuff these days. All aboard the Newt train for so many conservatives!
I liked Herman Cain, I liked Perry, I liked Michelle Bachman, I like Santorum, I even like the answers Romney gave in the debates. Conservatives could not stomach Herman Cain but Newt is right on! Right on! Right on! 

 Alleged affairs by a man that stayed married. Unsubstantiated affairs by people living in an apartment complex with Obama’s attack dog Axelrod who made attacks on his character from up to 20 years ago that cannot be substantiated and are made by desperate (financially) people with very checkered pasts. Cannot have this man, Herman Cain, in the running for President. But a man who it can be substantiated had 3 affairs and probably many more. For instance, one woman, Anne Manning came forth and confirmed a relationship with Newt during the 1976 campaign. She said “We had oral sex. He prefers that modus operandi because then he can say, ‘I never slept with her.’”  If this is the case, what makes republicans think that a long line of accusations is not coming? And that is just sex and adultery…

  There was the book deal in 1984. Horrendous and evil, NO, but illegal and lines were crossed. There were actually 3 border line book deals. Again bad judgment not evil. Story of Newt’s political life…bad judgement.
  Newt is the Father of earmarks (he designed them as a way to keep republicans in power, there were none before him), helped develop the idea of an individual Healthcare mandate and supported the idea for 18 years at the Federal level (Newt was for it before he was against it), proposed cap and trade and other ideas to fight AGW, insisted on a comprehensive immigration proposal rather than build the fence and secure border first- all other issues related get addressed later (he was for it before he was against it) , was tossed out of the speakership for corruption and poor leadership, was for Medicare part D (not to mention the “doc fix” legislation that deceptively “fix” the Medicare budget yearly but the savings are never realized and terrorize doctors) and even strong armed Republicans (who were instinctively against it) into voting for it,  he accused Paul Ryan of Right Wing Social Engineering for trying to gradually nudge Medicare in a bipartisan way toward private accounts (Newt was against Ryan’s plan before he was for it), S-CHIP program -now near 4 in 10 children in the US are on Medicaid (a terrible and expensive medical plan which would later become one of our budget breakers of today’s budgets-err continuing resolutions), and proposed eliminating Federal judges who don’t vote your idea of the constitution and calling up judges before congress (what’s fair for Republicans is fair game for Democrats). Newt bounced 22 checks as was revealed in the House banking scandal. YUP that is our guy. He talks tough to the media and has big ideas. Shesssh, we never learn!

  “I think you can write a psychological profile of me, that says I found a way to immerse my insecurities in a cause large enough to justify whatever I wanted it to.”  Newt once told interviewer Gail Sheehy. This fits nicely with the infamous comment about Clinton putting Newt in the back of Air Force One. His crushed ego led to the collapse ( with this plane comment) of Republicans commitment to their budget and with that -came the reelection of Bill Clinton. Tom Coburn said Gingrich (at that time) became a whipped dog.

  From Avik Roy: Former congressman Chris Shays (R., Conn.) probably captured the strength and weakness of Newt best in comments to Bolduc: “He’s a true entrepreneur in the classic sense. You can launch the business, but you can’t necessarily run it.” Gingrich brought us a once-unimaginable House GOP majority but ended up using that majority to expand, rather than shrink, the size of government. (see father of earmarks above as example).

  Coburn and Shays are now skewered by Newt admirers as establishment Republicans and some even use the name Rino which is bizarre. They get added to the list of John Campbell, Jason Chaffetz, Nikki Haley, and Jeff Flake. Even though their records are near 100% conservative.

  In the debates Newt has rattled off hundreds of things that ‘he will’ do to fix things. A president who is going to ‘do’ many many many things but all these things have to be written up in committees and passed by a House and Senate. Reagan had 3 goals and he focused on them and put a lot of energy into getting them done and they changed the country (and the world). A hundred or hundreds of things? Is this leadership, the shotgun approach? Gingrich is famous for finding red meat items to work on, but the critical items we conservatives are interested in- to get America back on track; get pushed to the back of the bus. The Tea Party was about the insane spending from 2008 through 2010 (and before) and the effect this spending would have on taxes soon enough for us and big time for our children and grandchildren. The Tea Party is still concerned about spending but now have different arenas in which we battle, enlarging the Tea Party caucus in congress. I know it is David Frum but see http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/01/23/newt-gingrich-trivial-issues-warrior.html

So then who is the non progressive?  Surely Romney is a progressive and worse? Could it be Santorum?  If not, then who is the least progressive?  People say that Newt will be creamed.  By whom, a non existing president.  Ladies and gentleman I say the fight is for life and with Obama it is death. Slow and sure death.  We must come together as a nation for a candidate that can win over Obama.  So then who is it that we rally behind?  For me Romney is better than Obama, Newt is better than Romney, Santorum is better than Newt, but in the end I will vote for the Republican.  In the mean time we have allowed the liberal media to rip our people apart.  We are becoming so fractured that it may be hard for either of them to win.  I feel we as a people are once again being lead astray. 

I have emailed so many people asking why no one mentions about why Newt Gingrich very vigorously supported Dede Scozzafava, a very liberal Republican who in 2008 was running for congress in the NY 23 district,  Scozzafava was pro-choice and for Gay marriage.  I never saw Newt so upset in statements he made after Scozzafava lost the primary.  His first statement after the Scozzafava’s loss was one of an angry man.  If Newt professes to be such a conservative why would he “so vigorously” support this liberal candidate. 

Glenn…think back & recall how many times you’ve MISSED the mark in your lifetime…!! Now..FORGET all of ‘em…Your demonizing of Newt Gingrich OUT DOES ‘EM ALL!!  You’re WRONG HERE..Newt’s the answer to BEGIN our country’s RESTORATION now..just as he  did with President Reagan, Jack Kemp, Art Laffer..etal.to overcome the Carter Fisaco..& again with Clinton & Tip O’Neil in a swamp infested (like now) Congress to get 4 balanced budgets..PLUS other meaningful projects implemented that brought a return to some prosperity..Newt will NEED  a continued majority in the House..& gain a Majority in the Senate to enhance our beginning restoration process..Otherwise..”Spooky Dude” get’s to keep his  “Pinocchio”  puppet in the WH another 4 years & THEIR agenda for a “ONE WORLD ORDER” CONTINUES TO “PROGRESS”!!

Are you a prophet? Are you one of the “Holy than Thou” righteous person who thinks people cannot repent? how sure are you that Newt has a lesser chance to win against Obama after that LANDSLIDE victory in the MOST conservative state of SC? By what measure or analysis did you based your conclusion on?
This is a pure emotional talk with no logic at all.

The Dems did the same thing to Sarah Palin when she was Governor of Alaska.  They filed one ethics violation after another after another and she felt it was costing the state too much money – so she stopped them by resigning.  That is the reason Newt resigned – not in disgrace, but to stop the Dems in their tracks.  The $300,000 was not a fine.  I am VERY disappointed in Mitt Romney.  He started all the despicable attack ads and Newt had no choice but to defend himself.  Republicans are playing right into the Dems hands and creating so much inner-chaos whoever becomes our nominee will have little time to recover before Obama and his thugs get started.  I am furious at Glenn for his attacks on Newt Gingrich.  If Newt is our nominee, what is Glenn going to do – vote for Obama??? – not vote???  If he doesn’t cast a vote for our candidate, he will be voting for Obama.  Shame on Glenn.

Newt, like Romney is NOT the only person that can beat Obama.You need to stop listening to political pundits that keep trying to brainwash people into how BRILLIANT Obama is. Ever LISTEN to Obama try to speak or answer questions without the benefit of a teleprompter? I’ve never heard so much stammering! Obama is NOT a Constitutional lawyer, nor has he ever been a law professor, he’s just someone that has been propped up by the progressives and supported and protected by the media. Just because you give a few guest lecture speeches in a college classroom does not make you a prof. Newt IS a progressive, and I’m really getting tired of his flip flopping being excused as “I changed my mind…or I’ve learned since then”. For someone of his intelligence, he had to know that the global warming was nothing more than a power grab…The fear in electing a person that thinks FDR was a swell guy is that people will be lulled into a false sense of security because they think a conservative is in the White House. He’ll sweet talk and lull americans back to sleep and take away even more of our liberties. Newt may be quick with the answers HE wants to answer (anyone notice how he avoided two questions asked of him during the debate???) I think it would be interesting if the TEA party would go out and vote like crazy for Santorum. It would shock the pundits and shake up the GOP. They are only in charge of who is nominated because WE allow them to tell us how to think and vote.

Alright, so Glenn, tell us who can win against Obama.  Rick Santorum?  He’s a great man.  He is a great conservative.  He is loved by his wife and children.  He goes to church every Sunday, BUT HE CAN’T WIN AGAINST OBAMA.  So you know what will happen?  They will put another John McCain in and he will win the nomination but he won’t win against Obama.  Remember 2008?  Huckabee and Guiliani were in the race.  One of them should have won the nomination, but did they?  No.  We got RatB*** John McCain.  Who would vote for him?  No one.  But we did.  Progressive NWO globalists, not just Soros, we all know who they are except it seems you Glenn,  are running this country.  America we can’t win.  It’s all over

…

 Well said!!

Keith..see you missed your surgery to have your head REMOVED from your COLON..You have between now & November to get that taken care of…GOOD LUCK!!

Dear Glenn,
I signed up for one year of GBTV.  I strongly support Newt and I think your attacks on him are disgusting.  Please cancel my GBTV subscription.  I have no desire to listen to your rhetoric anymore.  I am a Consitutional Conservative that can think for myself and your obvious distortions will be your downfall. 
signed,
Michael G. Batchlear CPA

Newt has said a number of things over the years, that I disagree with. However, I have to keep going back to what he actually accomplished when he was speaker. I believe he would carry that same approach as president. Apparently, many of us TEA PARTY folks feel the same way.

But it still comes down to who can beat Obama…..
Romney   No
Santorum No
Paul        No
Gingrich   Maybe

So,unless you have someone else to propose; someone who actually has the name recognition and support of the great majority of voters; someone who has the financial and organizational resources to enter the race now and win…. your solution is to not vote for anybody ?
I can only buy that as a strategy if you also start a program pushing conservative Senate candidates, so we can control the purse strings and legislative direction.

One serious doubt that exists on his characterization of Newt (is the disease catching from Ann ColdTurkey and Jennifer Rubsin?) is the number and quality of endorsements of Newt:

The ones I am aware of:  Newsmax, Rick Perry (and by extension, Bobby Jindal, Chuck Norris, Mike Huckabee (implicitly), Sean Hannity (implicitly), Brent Bozell (implicitly),  Todd and Sarah Palin,  Fred Thompson, Thomas Sowell, many Evangelical leaders, and many state Conservative politicians.

I have a serious problem with Romney’s stand on guns, illegals, Romneycare and how he allows the progressives to influence his appointment choices. Oh, and I’m not a fan of Newt.

So many people are making political calculations based on ABO.

Mitt has demonstrated he doesn’t understand how quickly big government
can take what he thinks is a good idea and turn it into a cluster f()ck.

Newt has the unique ability to twist big-governments concepts into a balloon animal full of hot air that Conservatives are willing to accept. However, at the core, Newt believes that Government can and should be used to “fix” things. He is a proponent of national healthcare, man-made global warming and is riddled with character flaws, yet Conservatives are saying, “but he’s good in debates” and “he’s balanced the budget in the past”. Beck is playing Newt’s own words back and connecting those dots. It’s not that big of a stretch.

Santorum is solid with a track-record of conservative actions, not just lip service. I’ve spoken to dozens of people who say something to the effect of, “I think Santorum is the best guy, but I think (Newt/Mitt) have a better chance of beating Obama. I believe that if everyone who is making that calculation would send $50 to Santorum we could get the truly hopeful message of Conservatism out and he will win.

Reagan wasn’t the party favorite either and people said he was too conservative. However, he appealed to people’s common sense and traditional values and he kicked butt…twice. Santorum isn’t Reagan, but he is just as solid and we can count on him to fight for the values and principles that made America great while making sure we are strong enough to defend ourselves against Islamic radicals.

will SOMEBODY just ask Newt Gingrich: “Are you a member of the Council on Foreign Relations?”  According to my lists from CFR itself, he is and was.  IMHO, they are the worst traitorous skunks in the Nation.  When I asked Sens Javits and Schumer (sen.-to-be at the time) that question, they almost heart-attacked.  The latter answered NO, but when I stared him down and mentioned I had him on the list, he said “Well, I was, but am not now.”  Two lies!  Over time, I found that he not only was then but had been for a while — and still is!  But this just goes to show that these CFR members don’t want us to know about it.  Wise up, Glenn, my friend

“Although constitutionally legal at the state level a true conservative
would never implement such a intrusive governmental authority into
peoples lives ( Newt is the same on the Dept of
education-a decision that should belong to the states).”

Newt, from the 9/22/2011 GOP debate in Orlando ”
I think you need very profound reform of education at the state level.
You need to dramatically shrink the federal Department of Education, get
rid of virtually all of its regulations. And the truth is,
I believe we’d be far better off if most states adopted a program of the
equivalent of Pell Grants for
K-through-12, so that parents could choose where their child went to
school, whether it was public, or private, or home-schooling, and
parents could be involved. Florida has a virtual school program that is
worth the entire country studying as an example.”

Sounds to me like the only difference between Newt and what you’re calling for is a matter of degree, elimination of the DOE or serious downsizing.

The real enemy is the state.

True, but it seems that too many people are forgetting about Congress. We must also be concerned as to who gets voted into the senate (1/3 are up for reelection) and the house (100% are up for reelection) Just imagine what could be accomplished if TEA party, Constitutional minded people were elected to office…maybe even get a real majority in the senate so a budget could be passed and bills voted on?

 20 years praising FDR, one of Obamas HEROES, and 20 years of pushing healthcare mandate, and a OPEN ENDED contract with a GSE that was failing bad to the tune of 24K a month….
 Newts “record” was due to Clinton making Bubbles ( CRA and Mark to Market, Dot.Com Bubble and Housing bubble) these allowed for more government income and lower unemployment and a “proposed balanced budget” for a few years, till the bubbles burst and newt was called out for ethics charges…

Look I love Glen and what he represents. All his projects in my opinion are noble and head in the direction we as a country and individuals need to go.  Sometimes we all get it wrong and I believe Glen has here.  That doesn’t mean he is, he does have a great tract record on being right, but years ago Newt was attacked by the progressives and the establishment GOP.  I have read every one of Newts bills he voted on and sponsored.  He for the most part has championed lower taxes and less regulation, including regulation in health care.  He has held on too tight for too long that mandate idea.   Conservatives where fighting Hillary care and came up with that nonsense.

I think most of us here know that Obama is a progressive to his core.  Newt is not so much a progressive in principle but has “big” progressive ideas.  He also has great conservative ideas.  His ability to articulate those ideas are amazing.  The fact that he likes Woodrow Wilson kills me (I understand that red flag and how it could impale you right in the eye) His Teddy R and FDR comments are very disturbing as well.  Two things about that. 
One Reagan’s favorite president was FDR.  Now Reagan did have a turning point and didn’t necessarily believe in FDR policy.
Two I have noticed Newt tends to try and take a progressive point of view and bring conservatism to it.  I’m not saying that’s right just saying it doesn’t make him a progressive just too smart for his own good. Or he thinks he is smart enough.  Let me make clear though, what Newt does is equivalent to a group of collectivist deciding to jump off a cliff and an individual say’s look at those dummies jumping together, I as an individual will jump on my own.

To rap up my point I do not think we have a great conservative candidate besides Santorum but even he has flaws and unfortunately is too social conservative to win.  (Although i agree with him just stating and unfortunate reality) If we get more Tea party conservative/libertarian members to control the congress they can pave the way back to the Constitution, not take us there just pave the way, and Newt could articulate why.  And then I guess we just cross our fingers and hope that same congress can restrain Newt and his “BIG IDEAS”.

Of course in the mean time with Obama out of the office, we will have a little more time to prepare our food storage, our character, our faith, our community and network, our means of defending ourselves and becoming who God intended us to be.

I voted for Santorum. He needs a super pact. He also needs Romney to help FIX this country..

Newt’s hair-trigger personality & actions, changing his personal history at will is symptomatic of his unstable demeanor.  He is a big government guy – who changes his position daily.  He is glib, scarcastic, mean spirited, ignorant of economics, anti-capitalistic, pro-global warming, demeaning to the long-term un-employed, womanizing, street fighting, pugnacious, vindictive guy with a superiority complex. 

Because Gingrich can deliver speeches well, without hesitation (or stuttering) he can make it sound that he is the ultimate authority on everything.  He dodges questions that will elicit a negative side of his past by going on the offense. Newt reminds me of the manic Mr. Toad (only without his compassion) – high and low, driving all over the place. 

Many conservative, highly educated, Republican women will not vote for Gingrich – at all.  They will stay home or vote for Obama. Frank Luntz should do a focus group about suburban women & Newt. Even my 89 year old mother says “why do we want to nominate a fat, white-haired, old man to run against Obama”. 

Santorum and Romney have Juris Doctorates, Paul is a Medical Doctor -Gingrich has a PhD in Modern European History, but with an encyclopedic recall of facts – often time erroneous, but he states the mwith such adamant authority you beleive them.  Doe he belong to Mensa what is his IQ?

Newt’s anti-capitalism rants and attacks are really smoke screens to cover the fact that he is jealous of Mitt; he dismisses both Santorum & Paul as trivial candidates.  Romney went to Harvard Law & B School, worked his fingers off in business to be able to live off his investments.  Newt, however, chose the Washington Pol career path by first representing a small congressional district, becoming Speaker – getting censured – and after resigning, going the lobbyist, consultant to Freddie Mac, wirter, speaker route to wealth. 

Perfection has never been the goal.  Glenn is absolutely right: Newt is a bald-faced liar and his speeches and writings from the past prove it.  He openly admits elsewere that he intends to destroy United States by smashing genuine Christianity (not his form of false religion for political expediency’s sake) and ending American sovereignty in order to set up a totalitarian New World Order.  His aims are identical to Obama’s because both men are puppets of the “jewish” global elites.  If the race comes down to Obama vs. Gingrich, the American people will be screwed either way.

Read his forward to the Toffler’s book, “Creating A New Civilization.”  The Washington Post has quoted Gingrich as stating, “I have an enormous political ambition.  I want to shift the entire planet and I’m doing it.”  This is a man who evidences a serious absense of honesty, and character with megalomaniac tendencies.

I’m not suggesting that Romney is any better.  He’s clearly one of the elites, having hired a eugenics professor from Harvard to advise him on how to rapidly deplete the US poplation.  Santorum appears to be posing as a conservative with a big government voting record while in the Senate, so it appears to me that he is a liar too.  That leaves Ron Paul, the only real advocate for common sense, ending the Fed and seriously paring back American imperialism which is only a way to further the aims of the global elites and their dream for a New World Order.

You know what, I’ll try that.  He is worth the $50.00 if doing so could make a difference.
He stands for everything I believe in.   Having said that, in my desperation to beat Obama,  I am/was willing to forsake my principles and vote for the guy who speaks the loudest.   I will trust in my God,  that He guide those in similar circumstances

True, but we keep giving the Liberal press the Debates, then Pay them, more to advertise… Makes NO sense that we should let the LIBS decide OUR candidate!

Completely untrue.
Who can beat Obama?
Santorum? Yes.
Paul?        Yes.
Romney?   Yes.
Gingrich?   Yes.
Your mother? Yes.
My cat?      Yes.

Any one of the candidates can beat Obama because this country will not elect him to a second term. Each voter should choose the candidate that best represents them. If you’re a conservative it should be clear that neither Romney nor Gingrich represent you. Conservatives and Libertarians alike need to coalesce around Santorum and Paul and eliminate the dead weight.

The “state” and the “collective” is the opposite of the principles of individual liberty and responsibility upon which America was founded. The more local, the better, the more accountable the government can be. Government is a bacteria. Up to a point some bacteria serve a purpose that is healthy. In the case of government that is to provide for a common defense and support basic infrastructure. However, when that bacteria run amok and begins to consume more and more resources we need to survive, it will kill the host if it is not beaten into submission and put into its proper context.

It is obvious that Newt is one polished politician. Whatever he said before has little meaning, as he said things that people only wanted to hear. That’s why he denies those former words. It only proves that he is a liar, just like all the rest of the candidates, just like all the politicians in Washington. What America needs badly is a leader who is willing to stand up and be counted. Admit to previous faults, if there were any, but show everybody that America needs to get rid of the corruption in the government. I have yet to see anybody have the balls to do just that, except Sarah Palin. The dems AND the republicans were truly scared of her for saying these things so openly, and the media virtually slew her down. I believe that she would have at least tried to clean out Washington, but there was little public support for her. Newt is too comfy in Washington as he is just another elitist who belongs to the corruption. The only position he is missing is the presidency and the POWER that goes with it, just like Obama.

The real enemy is the anarchist dumb enough to inadvertently help the cause of the state.

Think on this, Suppose Obama Doesnt agree to ANY debates?
There goes the Gingrich plan, down the pooper..
 A debate is NOT an election…….

Your repetition is almost like a liberal…..

I like Newt and whoever is nominated you or someone else will find big things against them.  It appears we just need to judge others and somehow it makes us feel smart or better?  I don’t understand when we have someone that can at least start get the country back on its feet (and I feel he is the only one right now that could!).  I think he is a forgiven man and is willing to lay his life out for everyone to see.  That is more than we have ever seen exposed by Obama and the people he has working for him in the White House.  At least I know what I might be getting and there are so many radicals out of control now it is going to be hard no matter who gets elected.  We need to pray, pray and encourage them and others around us just like the people in Wilmington, Ohio.

MarsBars-you’ve got spunk!   That’s a good attitude, but it doesn’t help those in Florida facing the voting booth.   Only those with passion will make the correct choice,  whether right or wrong.

Glenn, you were great when you were trying to educate us. If, as you say, that Newt is a progressive, and we like him, and feel he should be the next President, then I guess you didn’t do such a good job on the education front, huh!
And, you are no better than the media and the GOP trying to cram your favorite Santorum (who, by the way has baggage too) down our throats. And, he is a liar.
I still have my subscription, but until you go back to being the teacher instead of the pusher, I willl no longer watch your show.
I don’t really care what someone did in their past. You have one, I have one, we all do. People can change. Whatever Newt may or may not have been back then (and I believe he was a true asset to this country then), he said he has changed, and it appears that he has.
Why is it, that you (a total disaster in your past), seem to be the only one that can seek redemption and be forgiven for what you have done in the past? I thought forgiveness was the Christian mantra. Oh, I guess, only for self, not the other guy.
You and Schnitt need to take a lesson form people like Rush and Hannity. Don’t push your opinion on the rest of us. Teach us the history and let us make up our own minds.

I agree 100%.  What Glenn is doing is amazing and totally bias against Newt.  The Speaker may not be perfect however, I as a devoted Christian believe in redemption, and it is SO OBVIOUS tha Glenn Beck doesn’t.  It is a shame that he has taking a rough road in trashing Newt.  He should go to http://www.therightscoop.com , and check the CNN video from the years that Newt was sanctions in Congress and the result of such sanctions.  Also, Glenn and other can see a video from a very Conservative voice, Mark Levin where he confront Chris Christie for his trashing of Newt during an interview yesterday.  I have plans to go to Texas for the event he is planning, but not anymore!! 

So let’s talk specifics.  What is it about Paul’s ideas on foreign relations that you find so dangerous and why?

In my local area, the Tea Party movment is run by a Zionist “jewess” who has been dismissive of Ron Paul from the outset for obvious reasons: he does not support Zionism and transfer payments from white Christian taxpayers to “jewish” terrorists who run the state of Israel in the form of US foreign aid.  I am guessing that many Tea Party movements have been infiltrated and corrupted by leaders who are not what they claim to be in order to steer the constitutional conservative votes toward one of the two current leading Republican candidates, both of who support the global elites’ New World Order agenda just as Obama does.  All three of these men serve the same evil masters.

“It appears we just need to judge others and somehow it makes us feel smart or better?”
That is a foolish thing to say. If you’re hiring someone for a job, don’t you do your best to evaluate their behavior, and character? Will they do the job you want done? Will their behavior while working for you reflect well on you? If you think scrutinizing someone’s actions is a bad idea, you probably also let your teen-age daughter go out with whoever she wants without meeting them first.

Obviously you have been convinced by the Elites and the GOP establisment that Romney is the right guy.  Just for that same reason, I do believe exactly the opposite.  A liberal from MASS could not beat BHO.

Let’s face facts.  We don’t have a really strong candidate that we can feel really good about.  One might think that Gingrich can win because of his debate? skills.  I ask, does anyone reallly believe that Obama will open himself to a bunch of debates?  Not a chance.  He will likely agree to one debate, moderated by his liberal cronies, and that will be it.  I don’t think Newt would have a chance without all the debate opportunities that he has been afforded in the primaries.   In my humble opinion, we should get behind Romeny. If we can get him elected, whatever his shortcomings, I think he will be able to make great strides in turning back the Obama presidency, giving us a chance to find a more libertarian candidate for the next election.

“It is a shame that he has taking a rough road in trashing Newt.”
Playing video clips of Newt’s speeches = trashing…..huh?

This is a perfect example of why things never change.  People, like Glenn, tried to warn America that Obama was dangerous and they ignored common sense and ran with their emotions.  I always thought the difference between conservatives and liberals was that liberals made their decisions based on gut reactions and conservatives used their brain.  Clearly that dynamic is rapidly changing.  You can choose to ignore facts all you want, but that doesn’t change reality. 

Any one of the current crop GOP candidates will be far better than BO, even Ron Paul.
Newt would be the most effective.

your comment about the “jewess” is unacceptable….Tea party people are People…period.  and Ron Paul’s foreign policy is isolationism, which, in this world and at this point in time won’t work….we don’t need to police the world, but we do need to trade with the world…and he is naive if he thinks we can leave Iran to their own business and not have a big explosion …..those people are irrational, and need to be contained.

Here’s where you are wrong.  Gingrich is a “nightmare” among female voters.  He is a “con artist” and thinks that he can fleece the media.  Good luck on that one and good luck on fooling the female electorate.  Women are smarter than men because of their lack of a strong visual sex drive..  Theirs is more tactile in nature.  Unless the media can figure out a way to use hologram technology which is “touchie-feelie”, the Newt is in big trouble among women. 

You may be right. Obama & his machine are slick. Can’t count them out especially since we have such flawed candidates. Newt or Mittens are  constitutional fiscal social conservatives. The ones we had, the Tea Party, 912, and the like let them get trashed by the establishment or sometimes doing it themselves. Glenn has been all over the place in who he has supported and I guess now it is Santorum who is proven not to be a fiscal conservative which this country needs so badly now. Social is important, but if I had to choose, but one it would be fiscal as this is one of the roles of Government. Social issues can be dealt with via the states.

You may want to see what Dick Armey said about the tea party movement. http://video.foxnews.com/v/1411883245001/state-of-tea-party-in-2012/?playlist_id=86858
I think they have failed. He speaks about the Tea party sitting on the sidelines during the choosing of a nominee. His justification doesn’t cut it. If we go to convention as Dick thinks, there is no guarantee that Mittens won’t be the winner. We as Constitutional Fiscal Social Conservatives should have supported the candidates with these credentials. They are all gone now, ended when Perry left.

Not only, the ethics charges were dropped, but the IRS found no guilt in any of the charges.  check the following site: http://www.therightscoope.com.  There you will be able to see a video from the year when the IRS found Newt Not guilty. Unfortunately, by then Newt was already out of Congress. Also, watch a video from Mark Levin where he clarify that the trashing done yesterday by the Gov of NJ C Christie are totally wrong.

Nothing Glenn has said about Gingrich isn’t true.  Are we to be ostriches?

Typically, there are only three debated between the two presidential candidates and they don’t come until October.  So basing one’s decision to vote for a candidate solely on his debating skills seems rather idiotic.

What is the number 1 thing that we don’t like about polititians?? They say what we want to hear, and when elected they do something else.
I saw Newt speak when he was putting together the contract for American which included 10 points. He got 9 of the 10 points done while in office. Pretty good record to me, and that is what I call keeping campaign promises. 

Well put Nancy!!

I agree  Exit polls in PA in 2008 among independents showed that they voted overwhelmingly against McCain because of Palin and not for Obama.  Women are the maximum swing vote.  The Newt is anathema.  My own recently deceased Irish mother stated in early December that she would either not vote or vote against Gingrich. 

Big Ed stop making sense!  You might scare the simple-minded. 

The cause of the state is oppression and tyranny. How does an anarchist help that?

Keith, I think the one thing you are not considering is that Obama can’t win against Mitt or Newt. This is not because of Mitt or Newt, it is because he will finally be vetted for what he is and in many cases in his own words. This will all start next month and get more intense as we get closer to the voting booth. The bottom line voting will be anyone but Obama. However this will not happen calmly and we should expect much civil unrest from Unions, Acorn, Panthers, Obama mentors and the likes of the Occupy groups. The big race card game will begin in a historical fasion. This is the game plan for trying to turn everything inside out that we know.
The Liberal Socialist/Marxist/Communist leaning folks have no other option but to surrender at least temporailly. The people will win, just how much is unknown.
  

Well If Obama gets back in there wont be another election,, 

As someone who was stationed in Charleston for four years with the Navy, you have to realize that the Civil War is not over there yet.  Gingrich is from neighboring Georgia.  Romney is from Massacusetts.  The 54th Massachusetts used black troops and South Carolina has neither forgotten nor forgiven.  That is what the vote in S.C. really said.  It was not an Evangelista reaction to the Mormon.  It was plain and simple a racial vote. 

Excellent point.  I don’t care how repentant he may say he is, I’d never hire a pedophile to babysit my children.  Character does matter and character is formed by the decisions we make throughout our life, both public and private.

“Obama can’t win against Mitt or Newt. This is not because of Mitt or
Newt, it is because he will finally be vetted for what he is and in many
cases in his own words.”
Rich, why do you think Obama will be vetted any more this time? Almost all the same media characters are still laying smoke attempting to cover for BHO.

You lost me on this one Glenn! Sorry. He may be a progressive but so is ROMNEY. Plus Romney couldn’t even win the GOP nomination last time. What makes you think he can beat Obama? Unless it’s just the fact that he is a Mormon. If he can’t even figure out that Mormonism cannot be equated in any fashion with Christianity, how can Romney figure out how to run a whole country. As for me, I like Santorum but fear he can’t hold it with Obama’s attack machine. He loves God and his family too much to subject them to what Obama will do to them.Why does everyone think Romney can win when he couldn’t even beat McCain. A vote for him is as good as handing Obama the election!

Glenn is doing to Newt Gingrich what Media Matters does to Glenn.

And Glenn is being dishonest in his coverage
of Newt Gingrich by taking things out of chronological context, cherry
picking soundbites, and stringing together unrelated clips.

I have to ask myself what’s worse, a man who said a few things that I
don’t like, or a man who actually implemented policy that I think
damages the country? Glenn can only point to soundbites of newt, he
can’t point to actual POLICIES AND VOTING RECORDS. I can point to LOTS
of Romney policy…

Mitt was for abortion before he was against it
Mitt appointed Liberal Judges
Mitt was the first person to attempt to institute an interstand cap and trade program
Mitt signed gun control legislation
Mitt repeatedly raised taxes
Mitt funded planned parenthood
Mitt is CURRENTLY (today) invested in Freddie and Fannie (talk about hypocrisy)

And don’t give me this Mitt was up against a Democratic majority
nonsense.  Reagan was up against a democratic majority and he was able
to get things done.  Why?  Because he had a spine. 

If Mitt caves to democrat pressure in Washington like he did in Mass.
and appoints liberal judges it could be the END of the Republic. 

I had so much hope for Glenn, but it appears he may just be a charlatan.

Gingrich is not running for the position of president of the Republican Party.  That he could very easily win.  The independents will decide the election and with his negative factor among women, you can write him off. 

I don’t think so…..I am female, and everyone I know, male and female just want a candidate who will debate Obama off the stage….Washington republicans and too many more are missing the big picture…..We want Obama gone…period.  and if Gingrinch won in South Carolina, which is Southern, Bible Belt evangelical, then in Florida, which is a completely different landscape….then it seems that he is the one with he knowledge of our history, of Washington, of Congress and how to get things done that people have faith in,  but again.,    ABO..  ANYBODY BUT OBAMA, I would vote for a potted plant if it would send Obama packing…..  This election is about getting us back on the right track, back to the constituion, the bill of rights, and states rights…don’t care about the baggage  of any of them….the next election, should we win this one, will be the one to hone the principles we need for the future….Let’s just get started!!!

Excellent, Judy!  Gingrich feeds off the crowds, something he didn’t have last night, and the difference was astounding.  Just one debate where he looks wore and tired against No Drama Obama and it will be the death knell for the party. 

If Glenn is adamant against Romney and Gingrich, why doesn’t he just endorse Santorum who apparently is the only viable candidate?

That’s the thing.  Newt isn’t progressive.  He may be somewhat moderate, but he isn’t progressive.  When you go look at his actual voting record, you find out that Glenn is being very misleading.

of the choices left for the republican nomination, the only real conservative left in the race is Rick Santorum.  The tea party should coalesce in mass behind him.  He is the only candidate that will return us to sanity in this country.  We don’t need any more progressives in the WH.  Thus, no Romney, no Gingrich, and no obama!

It’s almost like the mormon chruch has issues a fatwa on Gingrich…

Here is what we need to be looking at – the direction each candidate has been taking over the past few years.  Romney says he has changed and is moving in a conseravtive direction. Gingrich often touts his conservative record during his time in the House.  Since leaving office, however, he has supported a federal health care mandate, endorsed global warming legislation, taken money from Freddie Mac, supported cap and trade, suggested some kind of amnesty for illegal aliens, and seems to suggest the need for government involvement in a whole array of other
issues.  Then when called on these things he has an excuse.

It’s all about trajectory.  Romney has been heading right, Gingrich has been heading left.  Do your research and you’ll see I’m right.

And for those who are espousing redemption for Gingrich, why aren’t you willing to give Romney the same benefit of the doubt?

Every time I hear Newt’s ad about how he created 11 million jobs………I want to up chuck. Government does not create jobs unless of course you mean government job……….lord knows we need more of those.

Poppycock!  We need to look at what they did when they had the power to do something substantial.  That will tell you more than what any of them say.

Actions speak louder than words and Voting/Policy records don’t lie.

After months of studying the people that are trying to convince me that they are the best choice  for getting rid of,, the socialist wack job,, I am starting to feel like I am being asked to get rid of one pack of lies for another. Sin is clearly accepted in the camp we call Washington DC. 

This is what could called a lame-ass argument, but I don’t curse so I won’t.

Religious bigotry isn’t any more attractive than racism.

The only real conservative is Ron Paul as we all know.Yet the main street media always try to discredit him.We as Americans can’t have it both ways either we believe and stand by the Constitution or we don’t.Ron Paul is the only one who does no matter the criticism that he gets he is the only one that continues to stand by his convictions.We as Americans must stand by America!!!

You are really a lost case!

 You don’t even know or understand Glenn.  Progressives don’t, except one thing they do know about him is EXPOSE those that are PROGRESSIVE.  You just exposed yourself ELPzee

I appreciate your concerns …as I have them myself, what can we do?

It can’t really be called bigotry when it’s true.  If Glenn gave balanced coverage of all the candidates, that would be one thing, but he’s essentially trying to commit jihad against Gingrich while the man from his own religion is, in fact, worse.

It can’t really be called bigotry when it’s true.  If Glenn gave
balanced coverage of all the candidates, that would be one thing, but
he’s essentially trying to commit jihad against Gingrich while the man
from his own religion is, in fact, worse.

Your whole paragraph is full of contradictions. You say, “no one likes Newt” and yet he just had a landslide in S.C. and I like him. Yes, he’s made mistakes but that’s what men of force do. You’ve probably heard, “men of force are men of faults!” What we don’t need in facing Obama is a luke warm, string for a backbone jellyfish, and that’s Mitt. He doesn’t know what he believes and he’s not what we need as commander and chief. I like the fact that Newt has made some mistakes and has come out and admitted it. What I really dislike in this life are the “holy’r than thou hypocrites” who look down their nose and condemn others when they themselves are probably guilty of worse. Seem to me that old Mitt is getting his butt kicked. And, by the way, I don’t give a damn what Beck thinks. He can have his opinion and I can have mine and I don’t see anyone else that has the experience and the guts to see this thing through. 

I still find it so hard to believe that a nation of so many Conservatives could not come up with better candidates than these.  They all have tremendous shortcomings either in past voting practices, past words and deeds, or in personalities.  Add to that, we have one of the most hated Presidents of all times because of his intense Liberalism and Socialism, and we still can’t find someone to step forward who is a TRUE CONSERVATIVE in every sense of the word, and who does not have a closet full of skeletons!  I just find it so hard to believe, but there it is!  Please get us someone who will thoroughly trounce Obama, and who we can be proud of! 

Glen, rather than continue to bash Gingrich, making it appear that you don’t believe in either forgiveness or that someone can change their positions in a positive direction, why not make the case FOR the candidate you support?

If your candidate is someone we can all rally behind, then it won’t be necessary to tear down other candidates, because it will be patently obvious who the better candidate to vote for will be.

DRAFT ALLEN WEST!

Right on Glenn!  When will America wake up?   This sure is scary stuff going on. 

The voter is having huge problems deciding what to do!  But we all agree:  No B.O.  Newt cuts ‘em a new one…Mitt is milk toast and hard to trust–so rich we cannot see an ability to truly relate to the average American.  Santorum has appeal but he isn’t David against Goliath exept to Iowa…and Ron Paul makes sense some of the time but his isolationism and lack of global sense seems too scary for this day and age.  Newt was refreshing in his media bash at John King–and we are tired of media picking our candidates and telling us what to think.  We don’t want progressive agendas (DREAM Act nor no-backbone immigration policies as a trade for votes.)  We want Holder gone.  We want the czars gone.  And that fake green movement is lining pockets of the Dem’s good ole boys.  NO MORE!  Will this process vett anything that unites us?  

Read “Creating A New Civilization” by Alvin & Heidi Toffler, forward by Newt Gingrich

I agree,
4 years ago the public became hoodwinked by Obama, now it’s the republicans who drank the cool aid in South Carolina after the debates. Gingrich gave them something that felt good to their anger regarding the rightous press.  So he’s ahead but he will trip up as usual and expose himself the lair and his progressivism is key to unlocking his failings.

RON-PAUL-SUCKS

There is NO surprise so far in what Glenn Beck is doing with his bashing & trashing of Newt.  One thing & very important, Glenn Beck so religious and so compassive, and now showed that HE DOESN’T BELIEVE IN REDEMPTION.  Newt is not perfect, but neither is Rick Santorum who lost his Senate seat by 18 point.  Glenn frustation first with Congresswoman Bachmann, and now with Santorum are putting a black masc over his eyes.  May God forgive Glenn for his lack of REDEMPTION. 

Hmmm, because I replied to more than one post with somewhat the same wording? I didn’t realize that we were only allowed one post, one topic. Most people don’t read hundreds of posts on threads like this. Get a life.

Its simple and the voting record is clear.Newt had a Contract with America and Romney had a contract with Utopianism,which is nothing more than tyranny diguised as workable,reasonable and some heavenly ideolgy of govt.Utopianism was the germ that influenced Romneyscare,and Romneyscare was the blueprint for Obamascare,and just like Plato,Thomas More,Thomas Hobbes and Karl Marx,Romney makes no apologies.
Newt spoke foolishly about something that Romney actually had an opportunity to veto,and instead he signed it into law.We can not allow Romney or Ron Paul to define our party.Securing the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity is what defines us.

RON-PAUL-STILL-SUCKS

Oh please!  Stop with the Ron Paul crap.  His drug legalization stupidity and his foreign policy nuttiness is not what we need.  He also comes off as a screechy, doddering old man which he is.  He is unelectable, even against Obama.

In the latest issue of “The American Legion” magazine, in the ‘letters to the editor’ someone wrote about the elimination of various departments i.e. Dept. of Education, EPA, the Dept. of Education, and several others.  Why isn’t this posed as a question to ALL of the Presidential Candidates in any of the debates, the incumbent President included?  I would like to know just what their positions are?  So far it implies that the media is controling what is being asked and avoiding real issues.

I am normally optimistic…but I strongly feel the next election is just going to give us 4 more years of failed policies. It doesn’t matter if its Obama, Gingrich, or Romney…we have reached the point of no return. Even Glenn won’t support the only true hope we have …Ron Paul.

Ron Paul would not be accepted in Washington. They dont know how to deal with people who tell the truth. Matter of fact they will see to it that one is never elected. Its not just the news media who elects or in most cases (selects) who they want in. The powers that be in Washington are busy at work doing the same. I hate to say it but I have this bad feeling that America is in for some serious judgement from God. I hope my feelings are wrong.

What we are fighting against is UNCONSTITUTIONALISM, something we have adopted gradually over the last 100 years.  If we stuck to the Constitution, we wouldn’t be where we are today.  There is no way of turning anything around without a total move back to Constitutionalism, because our unconstitutional actions are what is breaking us economically and in many other ways.

As Ron Paul explained here, http://tinyurl.com/7l2tfaw being Conservative is being Constitutional.  The only candidate with a platform that is constitutional is Ron Paul.  All of the others stand for actions that go against what the Constitution allows of government.  And there is nothing conservative about having an unconstitutional platform like all the other candidates do.  It’s time people wake up to this fact.  Maybe you don’t like what the Constitution says.  But do you really even understand it?

For Beck to have any problem with Ron Paul at all says one of these things:  1) Either Beck doesn’t know or understand what Ron Paul’s positions really are (not unusual because the media has so distorted what he says and blacked his own words out so much) ; 2) Glenn is not a Conservative at all; or 3) Glenn is a total fraud.

I hope it is the first one and that he will do some real thorough investigating before he speaks from misunderstanding and ignorance again.

*rolls eyes*

 About 70% of military contributions to a candidate are going to Ron Paul…should make us all really think twice.

Is that all you have?  Pathetic.

Dude, have you ever listened to Beck?? Did you even read the article above?? No you didn’t. That is why you are exposed as a bigot. 

Glenn, you’re waaay off base calling Gingrich a progressive. The man examines all kinds of ideas BUT in his words: “Thinking about something can be very bold and daring. Doing it ought to be cautious and careful.”

Military people study the tactics of people like Genghis Khan. That doesn’t mean they become barbaric marauders, they just get better at what they do. Gingrich has studied governance for 50 years. Just because some of the presidents he studied and admires - for strategy, style, technique, whatever - happened to be progressive doesn’t mean he embraced progressivism. He has fought hard for preserving America and American values.

I hate to say this Glen, but the liberal media wants Romney and I am opposed to anything the liberal media wants, so I am going with Newt because at least he can out debate anyone in the GOP and the libs just hate a GOP candidate that beats them.

“All of the others stand for actions that go against what the Constitution allows of government.”

Emily, would you mind sharing with us some specific examples of your assertion? Because I seriously disagree with it.

Uh, I just found out that Charlie Crist is running Mitt’s campaign. Its over for him, get over it

I dont find it hard to believe,,, not at all !. The Christian Church in America are the ones who dropped the ball by letting the nut-case named Obummer get elected.We Christians are supposed to be the light but in 2008  people just sat back an said,,,, Just let God handle it,,, or,, Im blessed and highly favored and God is in control. Mean while the stinking Lil devils said look!!!  the stupid Christians have let their guards down while playing church,, lets attack an fundamentally change America into the way we want it. Then guess what happened !! 

Gingrich’s military policy is not constitutional.  There is nothing conservative about unconstitutional positions.  Newt IS a huge progressive, plus a big globalist CFR member.  Newt is a big Wilson fan and supported Rockefeller.

BTW, Newt had 84 ethics violations in 6 years.  I don’t consider that working hard for preserving America and American values.  Contrast that with Ron Paul who has had 0 ethics violations in 30 years.

You better wake up before you prove yourself as uninformed, ignorant, gullible and stupid as the Obama voters were in 2008.

You only like Romney because he is a smooth-talking elite that only serves the elite.  His flip flops do not just cover social issues like abortion, they range from being for gov’t stimulus, for the federal reserve system, for cap and trade, for global warming, for gov’t top-down control of healthcare for all states, etc…

Romney’s aides bought all the hardware during his time in MA, clearly he has a lot to hide.

Also, Romney will play into Obama’s theme of using the low tax, etc.. that Romney and his GS buddies made money from.

Help!  Please define Progressivism for me

Chris Christie just appointed a gay black man and someone else that is highly controversial, so HE is the one who is an embarrassment to the GOP.

You support Ron Paul don’t you? Don’t lie

Newt’s talent as a debater is his ability turn the table and change his attacker’s position to one of defense while his position suddenly becomes that of the victim, as with the S. Carolina debate. While I personally deplore all the tax loopholes built into our tax code, one cannot faul Mitt Romney for being smart enough to utilize them to his advantage. Being LDS, if more voters understood the tenets of that religion, would benefit Mitt as a testimony to his business ethics and respect for human values and personal choice, whereas Newt’s history of leaving his position as Speaker of the House in disgrace speaks for itself. If Newt is indeed the RNC’s choice to run against Obama, it is the choice of the progressives in DC and not, I fear, the choice of the people. 

Sounds like one of the reasons they liked Obama.  Is that what we want again, a slick speaker?  All the better to lie to you, my dear. Don’t buy his snake oil.

can i talk to the of my conservatives budies here a minute. Obama is the enemy not eachother you idiots. what is the point of even coming here if all you guys are going to rip eachother new aholes. this is what the left wants us to do wake up and smell the coffee and grow up. it not the end of the world if someone does not like your guy and people are thinking for themself get that though your thick heads and stop taken clubs to eachother’s head with your guys name on it. we are all grown ups here lets act like it instead of like a bunch of five year olds that where just told you have to eat your peas or no ice cream. this is just stupidity run out of control!

Correct,if the other team hates your guy,then that means you got the right guy.And yes it is that simple.

I thank God that a socialist narcissistic idiot named Barack Obama got elected back in 2008. WHY?? because it was the ((wake up)) America and the sleepy Christian Church needed. Now lets get on FIRE FOR GOD and this beautiful land he has trusted us with an TAKE IT BACK !!    

Also, a huge enemy conservatives need to fight against in the next election is IGNORANCE.  Ie. being UNINFORMED OR ILL-INFORMED.  Seems like an epidemic with the choices they are making.

THIS IS A MUST READ FOR EVERYONE THIS ELECTION, PASS IT AROUND:

How to avoid voting for a Globalist Puppet:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/guest-post-how-avoid-voting-globalist-puppet

So the way the 2012 Presidental election goes: “We’re damned if we do and damned if we don’t”, given that Mr. Gingrich is the nominee. I’m really not surprised; both Democrats and Republicans have few answers for righting our economy. The country has been spent into bankruptcy now and into the future. We have expected that the barbarians would be always at our gates, but the fools in Washington have mortgaged our gates. Rome in 405AD. “How the Irish Saved Civilization” by Thomas Cahill. I wonder who will do the saving this time?

I cannot believe people do not see the “sameness” with Gingrich and Obama.  Both slick speakers, both liars, both egotistical, both amoral.  The only real difference is Gingrich’s wife
keeps her mouth shut.  Getting Gingrich in is four more years of the same.  When his own party does not trust or approve of him, that says a lot.  At least the misguidfed Dems approve
of their leader Obama.As a Ma resident, I believe Mitt Romney will be a fine president and will
serve this country well.  Compare his dignified stance with that of crybaby newt who cannot
wait to punish even with lies.
Wake up America.  Do the right and I mean right thing

Glen, who the hell else are we going to pick? Romney??!! Give me a freakin break. It was just posted this morning that Charlie Crist is running his campaign. Who else we’re going to pick? Tell me!!!

Can you please back up your accusations? It’s terrible when people just throw ridiculous unfounded lies out there….LOOK AT HIS RECORD!
 
Guns: http://aboutmittromney.com/gun_myths.htm
Illegals: http://aboutmittromney.com/immigration.htm
I have no idea what you’re talking about there, he has been consistently in support of the rule of law when it comes to illegals. Is your disagreement that you’re in support of amnesty?
Healthcare: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/196373/obamacare-isnt-romneycare/cesar-conda
http://bluecrossfoundation.org/Health-Reform/~/media/D0DDA3D667BE49D58539821F74C723C7.pdf
Judges: http://archive.redstate.com/blogs/jjfuller72/2006/aug/28/romneys_judicial_appointments_and_philosophy_no_its_not_the_pro_gay_rights_pro_activist_judges_pict 
I guess you’re referring to judges when you falsely say he “allows the progressives to influence his appointment choices”…it’s just fundamentally incorrect to say that. It’s a lie. Where is your proof?

that “truth” glenn is the reason we will always get the ‘president” they serve up to us. United we stand, divided we FALL.

Do you realize that Mitt Romney has the same big money donors as Barack Obama?  (ie. Goldman Sachs et al)   Plus, he has been endorsed by Mr. New World Order himself, George H.W. Bush (the first President who publicly endorsed the coming encroachment of the New World Order). 

Newt’s bad news, but so is Rmoney.

It’s very sad that the man who united so many of us is now tearing us apart and down.

I resent being called a “casual fan”.  We spent 60+ hours on a piece of crap, broken down bus with a backed up stinky toilet to attend your 8-28 Restoring Courage, faithfully watched your Fox programming for a couple of years, took notes, recorded shows, and even signed up for Dallas.  I’ve preached to family and friends and alienated more than a few. 

Now you are losing us with your relentless rhetoric about Gingrich.  For the past couple days you’ve been extolling the virtues of Romney while slamming Gingrich, including childish put-downs calling him ”fat”.   There’s no transparency whatsoever in your elevation of Romney and it appears you are trying to influence the voters to benefit Romney – guess you’ve changed your mantra and we no longer should “read it and learn for ourselves”.  Don’t worry, Glenn will tell us what to do.  IF you should decide to spend three hours lambasting Romney for saying he would vote for NDAA, then you will regain some credibility with this household.   

By the way, we are Santorum supporters - have contributed to his campaign (same with Bachmann).  

glenn .. you have it wrong… well at least half wrong.. it’s Romney who is the progressive. not Newt….. even if he had some progressive tendencies in the past they are gone now,,, oh and you said you would never let that go.. shame shame shame you expect us to let go of your past, and give you a fighting chance… and you affect millions of people with your opinions.. so here’s the deal…. I have been a supporter of your for years… that stops now.. and I will spend tons of energy , I’m retired, to spread the news that you are hypocritical in your life.. that is how you live, let’s not forget that you depend on us to exist in the public.. it would be better for you to stop your campaigning and just stick to the present every day news… you are a pinhead

Newt is the guy! He balanced the budget… 4 times. He has bold new conservative ideas. Glenn what is your Texas address? I would like to send you some Great American Cheese to go with your whine.

Just a few short years ago, a young lady at the check-in desk in a MAJOR Atlanta hotel did not want to honor my brother’s room reservation.  Our last name is SHERMAN.  She avowed that they didn’t want any Shermans in their building.  Her supervisor convinced her that that probably wasn’t a good stance for her to take…..and the supervisor checked my brother in.  Welcome to the ‘new South’!!!

I also resent being called a casual fan.  I have listened to Glenn for almost 10 years.  I have lost friends defending him.  I have bought his books just to support him.  I went to his simulcast shows just to support him.  That’s not a casual fan.  Maybe I placed an inappropriate amount of trust in him in the first place…i don’t know.

its funny you have a person that has been in the middle of govt, as the speaker no less, and because they have found information or amunition as you will to use against him, they are slam dunking his past. so far all ive seen is an informed, undoubtably great debater with tons of knowledge, that fesses up to the mistakes he has made, and has proven many of the false allegations about himself. he went out of the house not as a disgrace, get your facts straight, and his insights were missed after he was gone. the ethics charges everyone brings out were dropped, and i have heard many versions of the freddy mac problem, but again he brings up what went on there, and clears himself. glenn, i admire you greatly, and i listen to everything you have to say, but when it comes to newt gingrich, i find an itelligent, knowledgable, and excellent speaker that knows the govt and will not spend the first four yrs learning the job, he will walk in there and begin to clear up the aweful mess that has been going on, and begin to rebuild our origins. they laughed at reagan when he got in bringing up that he was just an actor, and look at what he accomplished, i was proud to call him the father of my country. newt is a christian, a good husband to his wife, and a father and grampa, give him a chance, he is asking our forgiveness of past discresions, as he did to god, and all i see before me is the man i believe that can start us on the correct path back to the america we believe in, god bless america, bring GOD back into our country and it will once more prosper

All 3 approve of the existence of the Federal Reserve.  This is unconstitutional.  They all approve of wars of aggression (not for our defense, but for offense).  This is unconstitutional.  While they try to make it look reasonable, that’s how we moved away from the Constitution gradually all these years.

And there are so many areas, like their desires for amendments to the constitution which limit freedoms etc.  There are so many other areas, but those 2 above are the big ones.

If we call ourselves Christians and we really are, we should through Gods wisdom and understanding pray for direction in who we should vote. Or we could call ourselves Christians and act like the OTHER FOLKS that we seem to despise and spend our evenings beating the crap out of each other with words on this site,, ???????  Hmm,,, what should I do???????    

All I can say is the deficit has gone down twice in American History and the common link with both Presidents Reagan and Clinton were Newt…I agree that there may be a problem with his character..but I am  very forgiving and only my maker can decide what is in a man’s heart…He said he has changed, I think he is mature enough to avoid any kind of slaughter..I will vote for anyone but Obama in 2012, could we just keep in mind who the real enemy is?? I hope Allen West or Marco Rubio will be the running mate…Glenn you know I still think you are the bomb…please who’s left…Santorum is awesome but for some reason everyone thinks we need a guy who can do some real damage to Washington I know what the reason is same old same old won’t fix anything…I’m guessing whoever wins the nomination is that guy..Let’s face it there was no bs in the debate last night, you know why, Gingrich told the MSM to stick it where the sun don’t shine…don’t even get me started on all the stuff I read his ex did to him..

ron wasn’t the speaker with a target on his back either how may people really knew  who ron paul was before this election cycle i was around when this went down and a lot of those in his own party (read establishment  republicans)sided with the democrats and by the  way  83 violations  dismissed and one  was a minor infraction of having and attorneys name on his  stationary  hardly  in the league of any of the people  you cite as dangerous progressive and yet in spite of that we had prosperity  and balanced budgets albeit  with  base line budgeting  i believe  newt has changed  not as bad as jim wright or nancy pelosi  .. to that point  glen always  says  dont believe him do you own research  i suggest everyone  do just that  oh and by the way he left two years after the supposed  ethic violations  how do you  do that in shame  lies  people  your  drinking  some ones coolaid  

If you think GB’s replaying of Newt’s own words is going to destroy him, just imagine what BHO is going to with Newt’s own words.  I can not vote for Newt, I can not vote for Mitt, and Ron is a Soros’ hack.  By default, it’s Rick and I’m not too pleased with that.  Only comfort I get out of voting for Rick in a week from today, it’s not going to matter, the storm is nearly here and nothing is going to change it.  Hopefully by 2016, the real “do or die” election will be facing us as we begin to rebuild from economic ruins.  That will be the key election on where this country is going to be headed to for the next century or two as we struggle with reality of no longer being the world’s #1 economic power house and no longer having the world reserve currency and having to accept a world currency as we struggle to pay off enormous debt in real world rates without the ability to print our own money at will to cover it all.  

you make a great argument!!

there you go, i think we are both on the same page, lets get someone in there that wont waiste the first four yrs learning the job, and will get to work. i believe in glenn too, my ma likes marco rubio, but theres a couple others. once sarah palen backs him, i believe he will start to have a very strong backing, keep it up deeme, gingrich is the man who can start to unravel the mess we are in!!!!

you go dude, people need to get their facts straight before they open their mouths.

let put it plainly if he cant do the job we replace him BUT at  his worst it is better than mitt or obama i used to want an outsider but i now believe dc is such a mess we need some  one who has the intellect to navigate it with out getting blindsided by the liberals and /progressive and democrat. the way i hear Glen and other state it is they are all gonna sit on their hands and  let the next pres do all the  lifting  thought were electing  a leader and to be able to lead one must have follower’s 

I believe that Glenn Beck is anti-Catholic. He converted to Morman and they brainwash you against Catholicism.  WANNA BET ??  He NEVER says a good thing or even mentions Catholics. The way he knocks Newt, is bad for the country.  It’s ammunition for the Dems.

did everone here eat crazy pills or something.

I have to agree with Glenn, even before I read his opinion.  None of the candidates, except Ron Paul, are what we need.  Newt, Mitt, Rick Santorum are still the “same ole same ole” politicians pushing a foregiven agenda.  I have consistently agreed with Ron Paul because he wants to return to the Constitution and our laws.  Newt is the biggest phony of them all.  He is the reason we have illegals that have been here for 25 years and now he wants to grant them amnesty?  Says who?  No the American people who have suffered at the hands of Newt Gringrich.  He is an out-of-touch egotist.  Please, please, look at his record.

Glenn

There is not one politician that will ever meet your specifications. If you find one he/she will be so far out in the extreme that only nut cases will consider him/her acceptable for anything but a straight jacket. That is a definition of Ron Paul.

Glenn, you have left the building and I am not following you any longer. My wife still likes you but I do not anymore.

Your economics book was all fluff and must have been written by some one with a 4th grade education with the attention span of 5 minutes.

We went to Israel with you, we went to Washington DC with you, we went to at least 3 movie houses to listen to you and have attended at least 5 of your personal appearances including your seminar in Orlando on how to put things right. What a complete farce that was. You can not even keep one of your sessions going in the same direction.

When it comes to interviewing someone we have to listen to you tell how it is and then get maybe a nod from the expert you brought in to speak. That is unless the person talks over you.

You condemn other people for their mistakes even though they have asked for forgiveness. However you constantly remind us of  your drunken wasted years you put your family and friends to. Did you ever ask for their forgiveness and if you did did they forgive you time and time again only to have you fall off the wagon again and again? In the end they most likely just let you go to the bottom and let you dig yourself out . Forgiveness came afterward most likely.

Yet you can not find it in your heart to forgive others. You remind me of story in the bible where Jesus heals several lepers but only one comes back to thank Him. You evidently was not the one that came back.

Glenn, you are a hypocrite of the highest order.

TG

Well Glen, put your money where your mouth is. Get your name on the ballot in those states still open. Maybe, even though you are hated by the left, you might dilute the delegates enough to deny anyone getting to 50% plus. We might still end up with dead wood out of the convention but there would be a chance at getting a dark horse. What say you?

Initially I was not for Romney, leaning toward Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich.
As I evaluated them over the last few weeks, it became evident Newt Gingrich was
an “angry old man” only exceeded by his arrogance in pushing his being a true
conservative, which appears to be “accurately identified by Ron Paul as
“counterfeit” – I’ve not seen any rebuttal on the “youtube” video “The Real Newt Gingrich” I asked many to
watch – making it sound more credible with time.At first I thought maybe Rick Santorum would
be a good running mate for Romney to give us the “best of both” but he is
loosing my vote for because of his recent rhetoric. On Mitt R, being a “flip
flopper”- his record was being able to work successfully with a heavy Democratic
state legislature to improve MA govt for “We The People” – he has clearly become
more pro-life – not just because of his religion, but for the reasons he stated.
You need to decide for yourself. Another point, as a member of the same
religion as Mitt now for 52.5 years, I can attest, each year there is an
election, a letter from the Presidency of the Church is read before the start of Sacrament
Meeting, encouraging us to study the candidates, then cast our votes for issues and  those we feel to be good and honest to represent us.I lived in the Middle East
a total of 10 years and as a result am convinced that religious leaders telling
the members of their congregations “who to vote for” leads to the same
corruption as evidenced by “radical Islam.” Living in Iran for two years and then in Saudi Arabia
for 8 years, gave insight into what happens to a people, when their religious
leaders tell them how to vote (at the peril of their lives) and who also worked
to keep the people ignorant so they could be more easily controlled. Encouraging
people to study the candidates/issues and then select who they each consider
best qualified based on their own perspective I believe is the best course. The
words of a hymn course though my mind as I’m writing this:

“Know this, that every soul is free, to choose his
life and what he’ll be; For this eternal truth is given, that God will force no
man to Heaven. He’ll call, persuade, direct aright, but never force the human
mind.
Freedom and reason make us men, take these away what
are we then; Mere animals, and just as well, the beasts may still know heaven
from hell.”

We have our agency to choose. Hopefully we will
choose the right.

Thanks for listening, Ray

Newt is electable because people are judged on what they have done and not the efforts they do to discuss, consult, and debate.  Like Palin Newt was driven out of office by Democrat ethics filings legal costs, no hard evidence.  That says a lot to me.  He is effective against liberals.
Santorum record is short like Obama’s, however; Lincoln also had a short resume.  
Romney as a governor had a list of things done that are not conservative.

its true, glenn is forever bringing up his mistakes of the past, and how because of god he has grown into the man he is now, so how can he be critical of a fellow man that is starting over, and learning by his mistakes, im impressed!!!!

Newt had 84 ethics violations in 6 years.  vs. Ron Paul’s 0 in 30 years.

Newt is a liar, even better than Obama.  But if you buy his snake oil you will prove yourself to be just as uninformed, ignorant, gullible and just plain stupid as Obama voters were in 2008.   Take the blinders off, quit letting your emotions rule.  If we don’t get it right this time, we will learn our lessons with pain that will be beyond your imagination….the stuff you see on TV that other 3rd world countries are living in.

Click on my icon, and check my Activity and read my other posts.  This is no light matter anymore.

So much anger.  Your frame of mind is distorting your judgement.  Go ahead and stop listening to Glenn and go vote for Newt.  You’ll land in the same pool as 90% of the other ignorant people in this country following whatever the media tells them to.
Or go do some REAL homework on Newt so that you can start thinking straight.

as a christian it is hard for me to understand a man who’s father had five wives!

You need to learn to spell “their facts” and “their mouths! Very ignorant English mistakes!

What the eff are you talking about???

we r doomed; just  listen to the disasteris debate last night;  we r really doomed;  god help us;  newt;  said on the debate he us to work with goldwater/rockefeller;  the nwo;   woooow;  we r in trouble;  then on top of that we have romney  should had put shoe in mouth;  finally admit to capitalism with his jobs bill;  newt  affended medicare d  rick s;  big government also;   and mr paul;  he would be the only one that would be great but his foreign policys kills him;;;;    ;;;;we r doomed; 

Isn’t it hilarious when someone calls Gov. Romney a flip flopper?  He flip-flopped to the conservative side.  Isn’t that what we want people to do?  It’s kinda like witnessing someone to be a Christian, and then when that person becomes a Christian we criticize him.  Gov. Romney was supported by the National GOP when he ran for governor.  Now some are trying to destroy him. We are so fortunate to have someone of his caliber running for president. 

You are not vaible in what you claime to be.  In the primary we try to pict the best, not the worst. Newt and Trump are cut from the same cloth, except Newt is worst as he denies be what Trump doesnt deny.

 HOW TO AVOID VOTING FOR A GLOBALIST PUPPET:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/guest-post-how-avoid-voting-globalist-puppet

there you go, me and my ma would have went for him, then we wouldnt be having the discussions we are, we’d be talking about all his past mistakes in life!!!

As a parent would you want your kid to grow up and be Romney-like, or Gingrich-like? LOL Sorry for being so subtle!!

I am so frustrated!  How can we vote and nominate the best candidate when the Media consentrates only on the candidates they want—Fox included.  Michele Bachmand, Herman Cain and Rick Santorium didn’t stand a chance to get recognized.  Just look at how little media coverage Rick Santorium got when it was discovered that he had won Iowa.  But what a big deal they made out of Romney who had won by only 4 points.  the debate last night was a good example:  Rick Santorium and Ron Paul may as well have come late and left early.  I am just so tired of having the establishment choosing my candidates.  Then when things go wrong the media says” Well you voted for him!  What are our choices!  Totally frustrated.

I would hope my kid goes to Heaven. Even more subtle.

Ron Paul has a chance of beating Obama and that is who we should all be voting for

I agree with most of what you posted here but noticed you gave God the ability to grant rights to mankind and then you seem to set Him aside as if he is not a willing participant in our daily lives.  God has made it known to us that “All Things Are Possible” through Him.  If we have failed as a nation it is not because we are conservative or progressive, it is because we are dismissive of the only ONE who can turn us in the right direction.  God gave us a simple yet seldom followed blueprint to being successful as individuals and as a nation…   “YOU SHALL LOVE THE LORD YOUR GOD WITH ALL YOUR HEART, AND WITH ALL YOUR SOUL, AND WITH ALL YOUR STRENGTH, AND WITH ALL YOUR MIND; AND YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF.”  Luke 10:27.  You were correct when you said, “…I First and foremost know that their is an eternal Judge and standard of right and Wrong…”  I would encourage you and everyone who reads this to talk to that judge, see what He would have you do, BEFORE the final judgement and sentencing occurs.  It may be that you are wailing against God’s choice;  “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”  Ephesians 6:12

Also see:  Ephesians 5:1-21

PS:  Need answers?  “Pray without ceasing” 1 Thessalonians 5:17

Uh, Santorum is Catholic.

Keith

I disagree with you 100%!

Snake in Virginia

ok, done, whoops, haha!!!

 Oh yeah, and to think he has the same globalist bankster donor (Goldman Sachs, et al) that Obama has!

Oh, and let’s not forget his endorsement by Mr. New Word Order himself, the first President to ever publicly endorse the coming encroachment of the New World Order, President George H.W. Bush.

Be afraid, be very afraid!

Gurbon, he flipped back and forth over his career depending on the audience.  He may be on the conservative side now, but only because it’s politically expedient.

 Gingrich Threatens to Skip Debates if He Can’t Dictate Audience Rules:

http://www.davidmcelroy.org/?p=9856

Real homework, like looking at his voting record?  Because when you do that, you find out that Glenn is really being misleading.

Totustuos

You hit the nail squarely on the head. Go boy, I’m with you!

Snake

fixed it, oops, ty!!!

It all boils down to this:  We have NO clear cut  conservative candidate at this time and we desperately need to get Obama out of the White House.
So we have to make choices as to who could best do this. Romney is timid and weak, Obama would beat him up.
Santorum, I don’t believe, will be elected. Same with Ron Paul.
What we have left is Newt Gingrich. He has shown he has the courage to stand up to controversy. He is very smart and can think on his feet. And I truly believe he loves America and will do what we need to get her in the right direction again. Gingrich has proven he can get things done in Washington.
That’s my 2 cents…..

So your not for the constitution you want to be told what to do and when to do it freedom is about excepting what you don’t agree with so long as it is not hurting you.He is right on when it comes to foreign policy we have no right to tell another country what they can and can not do.please read the Bill of Rights And the Constitution it is on line and free you may get some true information!

Who is the better man, one who divorces his wife if she becomes afflicted with MS, or someone who stay with his wife regardless of the illness?  You’ve got a choice to make!! 

Right on!!!!

They were handing them out like candy, to the adolescents.

Didn’t make myself clear.  Glenn has it right.  Progressives are not the answer.

Neither person is better. Which person is repentant?

Are you suggesting that Newt divorced his wife BECAUSE of the MS?  Because if you are, you’re as big a liar as Beck.

Gee, I guess you think Glenn is an absolute scumbag too.  I mean look what he did to his first wife and family…

  I am revolted that Glen would claim that the witch hunt that the Demon’O'craps put Newt and Tom through is equal to “CORRUPTION” ??? Both were “CONVICTED” of “CRIMES” like SPITTING ON THE SIDEWALK compared to what MOST DEMON ‘O’ CRAPS do EVERY SINGLE DAY !!! Tom was even convicted of a CRIME that was made AFTER he did it !! FOR SHAME ON ANY WHO CLAIM TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND LIE even inadvertantly about someone who was the last to give America a BALANCED BUDGET ! ? ! ? ! WELFARE REFORM ! ? ! ? ! Stopped the Clinton Juggernaught !! Teddy and FDR both had some things to admire ! ! ! NEITHER of them could even THINK to do th AMERICA what O’ Brainless is trying to do ! ! !  I WOULD  VOTE  FOR  A  YELLOW  DOG  BEFORE  I  WOULD VOTE  FOR  OBUMMER  and I said that in ’08 too !!!

Glenn you disappoint me. Your a drunk and always will be. Sux don’t it but I have you on tape saying it for years. Do I hold it against you for life? When do you forgive ? Sorry as a cristian Zionist conservative I don’t agree with you at all on this. It does seem like a vendetta. Do you recall telling the stories about being yelled at at public places by the elite establishment with your kids around? I do I can post them if you wish. Stop it Glenn or I will have list all credit in you from all the years and books from you. Watching daily everyday even the second running. This is why I won’t buy your show. Sorry I’m praying for you to open your eyes and heart and really look at who has the vest record for Reagan conservatives. God bless

I

I’m telling you people.  The Mormans have put out a political hit on Gingrich to get their guy Romney in.  Glenn is engaged in religious jihad…they just don’t call it that.

That a crime?

CATHOLICISM IS THE END TIME RELIGION.CHECK YOUR BIBLE.

I guess that’s one way to put it.  I’ve read a few comments, though, that point out that we’re pretty much hosed if those are our options, regardless.  I’m inclined to agree, pointing out that I also don’t particularly support Romney.  The question we’re faced with is the same Hamlet was faced with.  To be, or not to be?  Do we roll with the punches, or do we go down swinging?  What this is really doing, though, is dividing the nation.  At least, it’s dividing those who can make a difference.  We all have to decide where we stand.  And we’ve got to hold together.  Otherwise we’ve not a snowball’s chance in…

???????

Well, I’m inclined to agree.  In the words of The Who:

We’ll be fighting in the streets

With our children at our feet

And the morals that they worship will be gone

And the men who spurred us on

Sit in judgment of all wrong

They decide and the shotgun sings the song

I’ll tip my hat to the new constitution

Take a bow for the new revolution

Smile and grin at the change all around me

Pick up my guitar and play

Just like yesterday

And I’ll get on my knees and pray

We don’t get fooled again

Don’t get fooled again

Change it had to come

We knew it all along

We were liberated from the fall that’s all

But the world looks just the same

And history ain’t changed

‘Cause the banners, they all flown in the last war

I’ll tip my hat to the new constitution

Take a bow for the new revolution

Smile and grin at the change all around me

Pick up my guitar and play

Just like yesterday

And I’ll get on my knees and pray

We don’t get fooled again

Don’t get fooled again

No, no!

I’ll move myself and my family aside

If we happen to be left half alive

I’ll get all my papers and smile at the sky

For I know that the hypnotized never lie

Do ya?

There’s nothing in the street

Looks any different to me

And the slogans are replaced, by-the-bye

And the parting on the left

Is now the parting on the right

And the beards have all grown longer overnight

I’ll tip my hat to the new constitution

Take a bow for the new revolution

Smile and grin at the change all around me

Pick up my guitar and play

Just like yesterday

And I’ll get on my knees and pray

We don’t get fooled again

Don’t get fooled again

No, no!

YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!

MEET THE NEW BOSSSAME AS THE OLD BOSS

you’ve got to be kidding me.  To say that the LDS church (which has no affiliation in politics nor supports any political group.  It only encourages its members to vote) have put out a political hit on gingrich is absolute crazy talk.

I agree completely.  Thank you for your diligence, Glenn.  The only one who is still in the race who understands the founders position is Ron Paul.  He gets called a fanatic for it.

  You are playing sound bites where Newt expresses a snapshot of his views and call him on the fact that he did not enumerate the specifics.   You and I both know that when questioned he specifically said what it was he admired in FDR and Wilson. 

I love you Glen, but you not being fair.  It is very unattractive to play, “Gotcha.”   Newt has plenty of  imprefections that you can nail him on, but his admiration for aspects of these presidents is not a deal breaker. 

I believe Thomas Sowell may have said it best.  While Newt’s worst is far worse than Romney or Santorum, but Newt’s best is far, far better than either Romney or Santorum.  He went on to say, when you are playing in the super bowl, and you are about to run out of time, you don’t pick out a quarterback based on his ability to do damage control.  You pick quarterback based on his abiltiy to hit his target the most often.  Finally, Newt’s worst is never going to be as bad as Obama. 

I don’t disagree that our nation is in need of moral growth, but that is where you come in. Yes, it would be better if Newt didn’t miss his mark on occassion, but think back, Mickey Mantel had more home runs than anyone of his day, but he also had more outs.  If you’re always swinging, you are going to miss some. 

i respect Glen’s views, but he has me reeling with regard to Newt. I followed Newt from the 80′s , and he was demonized by a partisan press,and democratic house back then. Remember the Gov’t shutdown where They put him on the Time cover as” The Grinch”.  HIs support of the Individual mandate stemmed from sound insurance principals as the only way it could have a chance as being fiscally viable, not as a way to take over the entire healthcare system.  What Glen isnt saying is  that Progressivism is so institutionalized by law and Fed. agencies right down to our local homeowners assoc. that even if Glen was elected Prez. there isn’t much one man can change. We cant elect a cheerleader like Romney, we need a coach with a big bold new game plan like Newt

I’ll vote for Newt here in Florida on the 31st.  Most of you are missing the point inasmuch as the person who has the most concern over “electability” is not any of our Conservative candidates but he who thinks himself an emperor – Obama.  Ergo, put the emphasis on the person who most deserves to be fired in total disgrace.  The very fact that the Republican Political Machine is dead set against Newt is an extremely positive point in favor of Newt.  I don’t want a president who is controlled by a machine.  As the former Speaker, Newt will be able to step right into the job without OJT.  He’s not going to be polished, he will have a demonstrative attitude at times and when needed he will be a  fighting SOB.  Wonderful.  To save America we do not have the time for a glad handing, “we’re all playing in the same band,”president.  Democrats (Socialists) and Conservatives are not wanting to live in the same America.  Finally, I’ll say it again:  Newt has been demonstrably contrite for his past sins, he has confessed, been forgiven and given absolution.  Folks, if that is good enough for God then it damn well better be good enough for the rest of us.

Dear Mr. Beck: Are there ANY candidates running that you  strongly believe in and could do the job of running this country? I believe that every American should be studying and reading every thing about all the candidates and after much of this along with prayer, only then should one be prepared to vote in the upcoming election. That is what I am doing and will continue to do. As long as we humans are living on this earth, No one human is perfect and running this country will take a perfect person and like I said yesterday, that would be JESUS CHRIST himself and I don’t think he is going to come back to earth in the form of man again just to run a country where many have turned their backs on him! We as a nation must humble ourselves, pray and seek wisdom from God! Our lives and our nation is on the line here! Thank you for the privilege to post here! Blessings on your day!

You are one sick individual!!!   I always say to people like you that if we are lucky to reach the gates of Heaven we are going to be so surprised to see the many faiths represented there.  I don’t know you Spence…, but my prayers will be with you tonight!  And, no, I’m not a Morman! 

I think you are right about Newt Gingrich, totally right on. I feel though that in addition, Americans are not educated enough (at least those of us that went to public schools) to know the difference between a liberal progressive and a conservative progressive, to know why they should care about what you are saying. And, I am exposing myself here, I am a secondary teacher in training currently after receiving my own BA in History years ago (not saying from where). I didn’t even really know the difference and why progressivism is a bad thing for America. Just looked it up today on Wiki. If I may say, I don’t think most average Americans get it. I think you are wrong that Romney has lost favor because the people are on to his progressive/big gov. tendencies.Does the average voting American know what that big gov looks like? I think they are afraid of his Mormon religion. Far too many people don’t even bother to get correct information on that when it is so easy, it’s right on line! I think there is a fundamental failure on the part of the vast majority of Americans to educate themselves. Where knowledge is power, misinformation or lack of knowledge breeds fear and faulty decisions.Too many people are interested in merely being entertained and going on with their own lives to actually take the time to gather correct information and weigh it and analyze it and make a wise choice. There are people that believe the lies they are told simply because they are told them. Public schools are working really well at creating a public that cannot think critically and analyze data and facts and then follow through to the “make wise choices” part. This is why we are in the mess we are in financially, socially, everything-ly! We need education. I agree with you there for sure. I’m glad you are doing what you do. I don’t like it sometimes. I don’t like your tone and how you go on and on with things, but I need it. I need to hear what you are saying. I don’t know if the average American is going to listen to you, Mr Beck. You are too passionate and they fear passion. Maybe you need to sound more like Neil Conan from NPR.

Check it out big Thar…The disgraced former speaker and his home breaker wife will never be our First Couple.  Get used to it, dude! 

What I love about my country is that we have the right to vote for the disgraced former speaker if we want to!!!!

newt is still a republican,anybody can stand up to obamas liberal views and policies. tell us glen,what could newt do worse than obama. he is already on record at all his recent debates.he is for smaller goverment,lower tax rates, keystone pipeline, create jobs,get rid of all the czars.we the people will hold his feet to the fire this time around. also, we need a person who can bring it to obama in a big forceful way. newt can do that. comment as you see fit—

Why is that?  Because you say so…  LOL

I support Ron Paul and I’m proud of it!  I know he’s the only one who isn’t a puppet for the globablists.  You want more of what we have now?  Vote for someone other than Ron Paul and you’ll get it … you proud of that, don’t lie  

And Obama can’t wait to get his hands on any of them, except Paul … the only one with integrity and a record that doesn’t need defending.  The man’s a genius, a leader with a vision and the only one who can pull us out of the whole this country is in.  All others will be another establishment puppet running their agenda.

Really?  Read this and get back to me…

http://www.renewamerica.com/mormon_story.pdf

And Ron Paul has ZERO accomplishments too. Well, one, to be fair.

Hold his feet to the fire?  Really?  Pray tell, how do we do that with Obama??  Sounds great, but not reality!  Obama would wipe the floor with Newt in debates alone.  Being a bully and good liar does NOT a good president make!  Yelling loudly does NOT make you right.  Being Right makes you right.  Ron Paul is the clear choice for a Great president, for a strong United States, for a constitutional people, for 2012!

I know most will not agree with my comment but I have to get a final “two cents” in today.  My decision is not to decide who is right or wrong on the question of progressive vs conservative.  It seems we must stand by and let those who are capable and willing to express opinions in an actual vote as the primaries progress exercise their constitutional privilege .  When the primaries are over and a Republican candidate is chosen in the convention, lets get 100% behind the candidate, mouth and money, and go on to defeat Barach Obama in the general election.  Agreeing with Glenn or not doesn’t really matter in the long run.  He at least is vocal and has the capability of making all of us process mentally the pros and cons of the candidates before we exercise our primary vote.

nothing against Mr. Paul, but if you sit in the corner , introduce no conservative legislation,and don’t assert your views, step on any toes, and  just whine post Mortom AFTER the dust clears you will probably have a
a pretty clean record 

I suppose fighting for laws that are For the people, vs for corporations, means ZERO?  Well, that explains how we got to where we are today in this country.  But now let’s jump from the problem to the solution … Ron Paul IS the solution and those who don’t see that probably haven’t given it much thought. 

you shore it not half the people here. this has to be the crazest crap that i have ever seen.

This sounds like propaganda being repeated, since it certainly isn’t fact!  Try a very important one Introduced by Ron Paul … regarding the repeal of NDAA indefinite detention clause!  Not very important for us citizens, just means we can be detains for no reason, Forever, with no due process!  Ever heard of it?  Yes, he fights For the people, not the globalists or the corporations.  That may not mean much to some people now, but believe me, it will soon!!

I don’t know how much worse Newt would be compared to Obama, but I see Newt as a fantastic speaker and what he is saying does sound very conservative.  Newt has a closet full of “clothes” but I’m not sure Mr. O could do much harm.  Newt speaks of smaller govt, getting rid of Obamacare, new tax reform.  He is pretty passive on the border though.  No one should be allowed to stay living in the US just because they beat breaking the law for 25 years.  They need to go back and get in line.   May God produce the man that can beat Obama and bring back our rights, liberties and freedom.    

I agree with the vast majority of what you wrote here.  I disagree with you that Ron Paul has proven himself to be a progressive from the evidence you cite.  I’m assuming that your facts are correct re pork.  This is how the political game is played to maintain job security in Congress and virtually all members of Congress play this game to one degree or another or they don’t get re-elected.

You are quite correct concerning the importance of pursuing the truth.  The truth is that our entire political system has been taken over by the global elites and it is they who determine who our President will be: not the American people.  All of this election stuff is merely for show.  It is grand theatre designed to deceive the majority of Americans into believing that we still live in a constitutional federal republic.  We do not.  All that remains is a flimsy shell, but the substance of our founding fathers’ design has been completely gutted.  Every President since Woodrow Wilson has done the bidding of these global central banking elites and their allies who make up the membership of the CFR, the Bilderberg Group and other secret elite societies and organizations.

In light of this truth, it appears to me that the outcome of the election is preordained and is not encouraging from a secular perspective.  From a biblical Christian perspective, the truth appears to signal that we are in the final days of the end times just before the Rapture and the Tribulation Period prior to the Second Coming of Jesus.  For those of us who are true followers of Jesus, this is both exciting and very sad at the same time.  It is exciting that we will soon be with Jesus and return to reign with Him in a New Heaven and New Earth later, fully redeemed from the effects of sin and wickedness that promises to exceed anything we can possibly imagine.  It is equally sad that the vast majority of humanity alive on the planet today is likely to be left behind in the Rapture to endure a horrific period of time on the earth.  God has predicted this time in world history for thousands of years in His Bible.  Every one of His over 300 prophesies that have been fulfilled have been fulfilled exactly as predicted.  So we have every reason to put our faith and trust in God’s Word and not put our faith in a corrupt and wicked world and American political and economic system ruled by Satan.  They shall all perish so that God might receive all the glory!

Buckle your seat belts!  2012 promises to be a wild ride!

I will never get behind a globalist, one who attends Bilderberg meetings and has an agenda to do harm to the citizens of the United States.  Other citizens should agree to do the same and demand our representatives represent US.

Both serve the same globalist masters.  Newt is not even 25% conservative and it’s premature to call a Republican winner.  Study Newt’s writings and speeches; Glenn is 100% correct on this one.

I am a GBTV subscriber and huge fan of the entire team. I so much appreciate that when Glenn went on his “rant” a few days ago that he apologized in the next radio segment. I knew he was frustrated and it really took a man of character to apologize for getting so upset. So, I was still with him at that point. However, after his apology he said that he would put up yard signs for a third party if Gingrich were the nominee. I am with the guys that Santorum is the best choice. However, for Glenn to suggest he would rally a third party disappoints me. I understand his extreme concern for progressivism. However, we must get Obama out of there for the sake of us all. And if Gingrich is a progressive, do I still want his brand of progressivism in the White House 100 times more than Obama’s brand? The answer is yes. Im sorry, we have to act now. Hopefully Santorum will rise. But, if not, Glenn, please do not let your pride in your teachings on progressivism to make you do something foolish like backing a third party. Not this year anyway. It’s too late and we must have Obama gone. Please do not encourage a third party.

So gay black men don’t merit jobs in government? Seriously. Don’t be a bigot. Being a conservative doesn’t mean you need to be a hater. A narrow mind demonstrates a low IQ.

I don’t lie anyhow. Yes, I do support Ron Paul because he is the only one of the 4 Republican candidates who does not appear to be a globalist puppet. Moreover, his books spell out a vision for America that makes immense common sense if you subscribe to returning to the rule of law, a literal and historical intent interpretation and enforcement of the US Constitution, and a restructuring of our foreign policy to get out of the business of perpetuating the British and Israeli Empire so that we no longer need to maintain a military larger than all other nations of the world combined.

I’ll go to the site and see what you’re seeing.

Sounds like you are being graded on spelling? What a Jerk!

http://youtu.be/wDyDxgJuaDY

Watch this and keep digging, Glenn.  You’ll get to the truth eventually.

I’m telling everyone who likes Mitt like Ann Coulter and some of my relatives that I am for anyone but Obama..that is the only way I stay sane…The MSM is trying to call this race and we have to stop helping them…Gingrich is the only one who knows how to give it to them…They made Mitt show his taxes right when O is about to give the state of the union , you know what that will be all about, the rich dont pay their fair share, that is bs..the rich are taxed times three…Mitt shouldn’t even have to pay a capital gain tax..they want everything, the money you earn , the profits you earn and more when you die…This is not what our country was founded on..But someone has to pay for the cars the light your garage on fire…LOL…I agree with you one wasting the first four years learning the job..that is one thing Newt doesn’t need is on the job training..He knows the ropes…

God has produced the man to beat Obama people just are not seeing it. Ron Paul is a very strong conservative and can and will turn this country around if given half a chance. Do your homework people, and see that Paul is the real deal.

Very well said. Prayer is what we need to be sure the right man gets the job.

I wasted my vote last time on McCain. I did not pick him to be at the top of our ticket, but I held my nose and  voted for him. This time i will vote for and support Newt. I am not letting Glenn or any other part of the media change my mind. And no, I am not sad about voting for who Ithink will be the person for the job. If I waste my vote this time, it will be my doing, not from follow the marching orders of the GOP.

it people attacking eachother over the canadates or Gods it looks like in some places.

really? someone just corrected your spelling of “their”?  I think grandma needs to take some English classes. The only thing funnier than her correcting you is that she called it ignorant!  Grandma, she got it right and you look like an ignoramus.

I get what you are saying Glenn about Progressivism, but there is not one man standing who fits your bill for President. Not even Romney. So in all fairness, keep teaching the people and maybe in the near future a non-progressive candidate will emerge from The People.

Oh for crying out loud ….. so Ron Paul is our only hope for the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.  You Paulistas are something else.  I suppose I am going to get a death threat from a Paullista now.
 

Hi Keith,
You are ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. I was just saying the same thing to someone today. That a vote for Newt is a vote for Obama. I don’t get why Glenn is saying what he is except that he really believes it. However, we do have to select one of these guys knowing any of them are better than Obama. The problem is which one can win the election. I don’t believe that it is Newt. I do believe that Mitt has the best chance. Four more years of Obama would be HELL!

Grandma needs to learn to spell, she sounds like an idiot.

Why not point out that 564 delegates Santorum and Gingrich aren’t eligible for?

Kind of makes it hard for him to win? He’s not even on the ballot in Virginia.

It’s going to come down to Obama winning or Ron Paul. Why?

Three elections so far clearly show:
Youth vote clearly Ron Paul wins.
Independent vote is clearly Paul’s.
Crossover democrats – only for Paul.

Toss in Paul supporters won’t vote for anyone but Paul since nobody but him is serious about fixing the economy, ending endless wars, fixing the tax code, etc.

It will be a brokered convention.

And Obama definitely doesn’t want to be up against Paul.

How can anyone that is going to make inportant decisions for the country, who believes he is on a pathway to becomeing “a god”.

Hey, man ……. I needa hit real bad, man ….. where is the Ron Paul dope station around here?  I wanna use the Bill of Rights so I can get some of the medicinal heroin, dude.

I have been a loyal Glenn back fan since his days with CNNHN, but I can’t stomach what he is doing to Newt. I guess Thomas Sowell and Art Laffer must endorse progressives, huh Glenn?

Didn’t know Mr. Beck was running for president. I don’t care what anyone does so long as they don’t represent me  in the WH. 

Hey, man …. I’m like still looking for the Ron Paul dope station, man.  I needa hit like real bad, dude.  I wanna use my Bill of Rights so I can get the medicinal heroin stuff.  All this talk about Iran is like bumming me out.  That place gotta be around here somewhere … oh, Ronnie ….

I think your putting too much blame on us Christians.  All the ones I know did a whole lot of praying……My daughter was a campaign manager……  There were thousands of Christians involved.  We prayed and voted.  NOT for OBAMA!  BUT….  God is always in control! 

 It is up to us to continue to trust Him, even when things don’t go our way.   We must remember,  He shines on the just and the unjust,  and rains on the just and the unjust, He is not a respector of persons.  We must be comforted in knowing He has a perfect plan.

Yes, as Christians we are called to pray for our government.   But we are also suppose to be watching and taking note of what is happening around us.  Everything that is taking place now is just what is leading up to the fullfilment of prophecy.  
Where the Christian church has become complacent, is in the call to go out and tell the world about Jesus Christ crucified!  For the harvest is ripe, but the workers are few.  What should really cause us to get on fire for God is the thought of lost souls! 

Yet, we continue to stay distracted from our calling by the enemy of our souls, while trying to fight for our land and our rights, rather than stay focused on the souls Christ died for.

We are to continue to pray, never lose hope for our land, but we need to remain busy for God and watchful for The coming Glory! 

NUMBERS 6:24-26

Let me try to set the record straight on the reprimand ONE MORE TIME.  When the IRS looked into the accusations raised against Newt it found that the donations to Gingrich’s charity were “consistent with its stated exempt purposes,” and Gingrich’s course and course book “were educational in content,” according to The Washington Post in 1999. Unfortunately, by then, Gingrich had left office, preferring retirement to a fight over leadership.  The only charge that remained had to do with inaccurate documents submitted by one of Newt’s attorneys.  The $300,000 was to cover the committee’s expenses related to this charge.  Hmmm?  That’s all a little different than Mitt and Glenn’s spin-story, isn’t it?  The reprimand was a politically motivated travesty of justice.

And, as far as leaving office in disgrace, the mantra Mitt was parroting last night, Newt “graciously” departed to avoid possible leadership rumbles, either because he might be tempted to mix it up himself or because some of his fellows might try to draft him for a fight.  I’m sure the Speaker who followed Newt was appreciative that Newt departed, leaving him to take up the reins without feeling he had his predessor at his back looking for a place to put the knife.  It’s really just good form to exit after holding the top job.

It’s weird, I support Newt because his RECORD reflects conservative values whereas Mitt’s record marks him as a liberally-moderate or moderately-liberal progressive — and a lier to boot.  I won’t have him. 

I like Rick but Rick isn’t getting any traction.  He just doesn’t have the gravitas to make it to the nomination.  He needs seasoning.  A little salt and pepper will probably help.  He should run again in 2020.

Instead of griping about Newt, get him to commit to putting your dream, conservative agenda into his new contract.  If you convince him it’s a good idea, he’ll fight for it.

How is it possible to put ones faith in someone who thinks he is on a pathway to becoming “a god”.

Glenn’s interview was an ambush followed by filling Newt’s back full of arrows, which to me means ratings ploy.  I don’t think Newt is lying about his agenda, and it’s a well thought out conservative plan to return power to the states.  If all he does is get an optional flat tax and repeal Ovomitcare we’ll be better off, but based on his efforts in ’94, we’ll get rid of the EPA and close the border as well.  Besides, he will trounce Ovomit in the general, b/c Ovomit has 3 years of complete anti-American failure.

Why does every Paul fan assume we haven’t done our homework?  Geez, it’s like the 20-somethings just got out of school and have cornered the market on wisdom.  

The man has huge issues, OK?  Many of us don’t think he can deliver with his polarizing approach. Plus, he’ll get us all killed.

Newt has said he would unconditionally close the border within a year.

The real enemy is the clap trap old leftist propaganda.

I see it coming now. Start praising NEWT little by little to take some heat off.

Call him PROGRESSIVE lite. (getting despersate now are we? but can’t admit a mistake)

Well, you DUFUSES at GBTV, I suggested a long time ago there were different levels of progressivISM and you were total idiots to make and compare NEWT to “the one” OBUMMER.

Newt      is PROG Level 1  (maybe Rick S and Rick P)
Romney is PROG Level 2 or 3 ? ( I think he will say and do anything to get elected)
                                               ( He flip-flopped in aa debate last night!)

McCain  is PROG Level 5 ( votes progressive to get his military, big GOV ! )

OBAME is PROG level 9  (duh)

MAD COW is PROG Level 10 (biggest POS PROG in media? who knows)
(so is almost all of MSLDS, Sgt Shultz, Chrissys, Not so Sharp AL, Etc)

BECKY, you have no shame, and should be ashamed of yourself.

Sorry so many people have dropped of GBTV, are we down below 200k users yet?

Stop smearing good people and YOUR fans, and you may be able to hang on for a whiile, but who knows with an EGO like yours.

YOUR Chicken SH#T tactics to demonize people (and Grandpa)  to prove you theories is very DUMB !!!!

Maybe you should listen to Levin, Rush or Sean to get some SNAP and put down the CRACK PIPE why don’t ya !

NEWT is not GOD to me, but he is not a PROG MONSTER.  GEEZZZZ !!!

Oh, I see…so you’ll blindly follow someone who has done these things, you just won’t vote for one.  Yeah…you’re making lots of sense now.

You have said it all. I’m afraid that no matter what any Republican candidate does including spitting gold coins while standing on his head, the leftist media will be there to follow the Alinsky playbook. I sure hope that Americans start getting smarter and more knowledgable because about what is really going on with the Obama agenda and vote for anyone but him. What I see as far as peoples’ choices are quite frightening. People just don’t try to learn about history and how it repeats itself and what the leftist propaganda machine is doing. Some people don’t have a clue and some of them are Republicans; not only Dems/Libs. I’m really, really concerned but I am doing everything I can to volunteer and support conservatives in getting Obama out of the WH and the Libs out of the Senate.

People need to wake up! This election is about one thing and only one thing – Getting rid of Obumma. Ask yourself: who is the best GOP candidate currently running that can beat him. Several respectable pundits are saying that Newty is very polarizing and may not get enough of the spineless “independents” needed to put him in the White House. While the conservative “base” may love him, the base isn’t big enough to help him win. 

No it’s not. It’s entirely accurate and reported in the public press. America’s national interests are not served by funneling half of our foreign aid money to Israel every year. What’s driving this is a very aggressive “jewish” money machine here in America and the global “jewish” elite conspiracy that actually disctates american foreign and military policy.

I’m not sure what you mean by isolationism, nor am I certain that you do. Ron Paul is questioning America’s need for 900 military bases in 130 countries around the world, so we are already functioning in the role of global policeman on the backs of the American taxpayer and incurring an annual deficit of $1.5 trillion on $3.6 trillion of spending that anyone knows is absurd.

Israel and the “jewish” owned and controlled press that pumps out saber-rattling propagada concerning Iran’s nuclear weapons ambitions is clearly directed at fomenting popular support for America or Israel striking at Iran and launching WWIII which the global elites have planned for over a century to pit Muslim and Christian nations to go to war and kill each other while the “jewish” elites sit back and watch the carnage and pick up the pieces which are left. It turns out that Iran’s President has been telling the truth that the Nazi Holocaust never happened. Instead, it has been a bold and immensely profitable hoax perpetrated on the world to shield the Bolshevik communist “jews” who led the slaughter of in excess of 60 million Russian peasants, most of them white Christians, under Lenin and Stalin, as well as to deny the ethnic cleansing of 800,000 Palestinians in 1947 and 1948 in the new state of Israel.

My sources are “A Greater “Miracle” Than the Lost Tribes Discovered… – the Dead “Six Million” Uncovered…!” by Brian Alois Clerabat, 2007 and “The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine,” by Israeli author Ilan Pappe, 2010.

As the first of these two books writes, “Telling the truth is not hate. Rather it is hate when violence or persecution is perpetrated against those who reveal the truth. Exposing the crimes of criminals is neither hate nor “Anti-Semitism” nor “Racism:” it is the first step toward JUSTICE. If criminals don’t like being called criminals – then let them stop committing crimes. If such people are not themselves guilty of crimes, let them dissociate and distance themselves from those of their own people who are guilty of such crimes – and not attack those who seek the truth and justice. Every tree is known by its fruit. (Luke 6:44) – you don’t blame corrupt fruit on the person who picked it.”

Yet this has been precisely the strategy employed by the ADL and other aggressive defamation squads to suppress the truth and intimidate and defame anyone bold enough to suggest that the “jewish” people are or have been guilty of any crimes or seditious behaviors in the past. The facts of history shows an overwhelming and compelling pattern of actions over the past 200 years and prior that all major wars, inflations and economic collapses have been directly orchestrated by a small group of “jewish” elites and their Freemason allies designed to undermine western civilization and usher in a global New World Order that they control. The common link is their Ashkenazi race and their adherence to the teachings of the “jewish” Talmud and Caballa which are grounded in hateful, racist, anti-”jewish” bigotry, the worst of which is dfirected at white Christians and in the secret worship of Satan (Lucifer or the “light-bearer”) as their true God. The whole New Age movement and modern day pracitces of the occult and witchcraft olur founded on the “jewish” Cabala and this is what guides the global elites’ New World Order agenda in the final analysis.

Attempting to silence this truth is evil and wicked. Do your own research. If you’re honest, you will discover that everything I report here is true. I didn’t believe it at first either; nor did I want to. But the evidence for it is compelling and overwhelming if you care to go look. The elites are counting on you not to.

I agree with you wholeheartedly. It’s all about getting Obummer out of the WH. Newt is very bright and has lots of experience but I agree he is polarizing (of course not as much as Obama is), but I don’t believe he can win Independents either which is a large group of voters who are on the fence. Who do you think should be the ONE?

I agree with you on Ron Paul, but not Newty. Paul would NEVER win a general election against Obumma. I realize he has a very strong Cult following, but the biggest problem he has is his views on the use of the military, or lack thereof. It is downright scary, especially when Iran could have a nuke ready to go at any time. Plus, even Paul himself says he doesn’t expect to win!

Thank you Glen, since you have been off Fox, I have forgotten how much of your talking points seems to come out of my head.  I agree with you totally on Newt, I recently commented that the only difference between Newt and BHO is the color of their skin.  I truly believe if Newt is the Republican nominee, it is a guarantee for Obama’s reelection.

You’re clueless. How about voting for someone who is conservative instead of a Wilsonian?

 Dear Glenn, To reiterate…… I have listened and read with interest, the exchange you had with the Gingrich supporter — quite astounding !  Now I will probably surprise you too.  I, too, have read most of your books and I, too agree with most — but not all — of your premises.  Mr. Gingrich is not the answer to our problems.  He is sharp, he is fascinating to the point of being entertaining –  but he is old hat – passe.  He is a hot head who frankly can not control himself. When he is behind in the polls, he seems rational, but he becomes totally egotistical & irrational almost down right nasty when he is in the lead.  If he becomes the Republican Candidate,he will divide this country – he will ensure another 4 years of Obama– I am afraid  Lets face it, no matter what Mr. Gingrich says, he is one of Washington’s greatest insiders of our time – who is he kidding ?  Let’s call it like we see it ! I am supporting Mr. Romney for the Republican nomination and most certainly for President of the USA.  Why ?  Mr. Romney is intelligent, he knows what it is to work for a livng, he’s had to make tough decisions, he’s had his successes & failures from which to learn, he’s been a Governor (can’t run a deficit government) , he’s not flamboyant – in fact some say he’s dull – (isn’t that nice !), he gets along with people, he works hard, and on a personal level, he has a lovely family – no problems there either – pretty dull stuff.  Some folks say he is totally void of charisma — Well, I ask you America, haven’t you had just about enough charisma over the past 4 years to last you a lifetime ?  I know I have !.   We need a straight arrow, a fixer.  One who will spend his time in the Oval Office to put this country back on the road to prosperity.  One who represents this country proudly — and does not conduct  “apology tours”. We do not want or need a president who spends his time on the golf course and who is frankly just having too good of a time to take our problems and issues seriously. In my opinion, Mitt Romney is the person to fill this bill. He will open up new markets for the US, open up domestic avenues for energy to make us more self sufficient, he will ensure a strong military and just as or even more important, he will restore personal confidence, pride of country and a renewed vigor once more in the American people and that in turn will restore prosperity to the USA. I rest my case ! Regards,  Jan”Hopeful On Long Island”

So why don’t we try to draft someone who is a TRUE conservative. There is plenty of time esp. if God is with us. George Washington didn’t want to be president and did it anyway for the good of the country. Why are we “letting” this slip by and just settling for the ones who say they are running. Who is going to DO something ABOUT THIS?

Passion comes from Absolutely believing what your saying!! Romney does`nt have any passion becaulse He`s full of crap!!! Whether you like Newt or not, Atleast he Believes what he say`s!!

For your info, I’m not a 20 something, but a 57 year old woman who knows a true conservative. He will certainly not get us all killed. More importantly he knows the constitution and has the best economic policy of all the canidates.

eporsche, I feel its a toss up between Romney and Santorum. I like Rick more, but Mitt seems to have more people willing to vote for him (even if they’re bothered by the Mormon thing, which should not matter AT ALL!!!). I like the fact that Mitt has experience in both the private and public sectors, which the USA desperately needs at this time. I’d happily vote for either one, but I think Mitt gets more “independent” votes. Vote Mitt in 2012, then hope a very electable, more conservative candidate emerges for 2016. Obumma will screw the USA so much if he gets another term and it would take decades to undo the damage. 

So why has he lost 2 out of three elections? There`s a big difference in being a “good” business Man and a PARASITE that attaches itself to a Company and SUCKS it Dry!!

But which candidates are not “progressives”?

As for Romney, he is probably not really anti-abortion, he has lied about his beliefs vis a vis abortion and he has said that jihad is not an essential part of Islam.

Jan, I really like your post and hope to God that there are more people (silent majority) who think like we do. Mitt is not perfect, but he is the best chance we have to defeat the Donkeys. If Obumma gets 2 more SCOTUS appointments (among other things), this country will be screwed up for decades. Hopefully the shaky economy will be enough to doom him, but we need to have people voting FOR Mitt rather than voting against BO.

Well, no offense intended, but it’s sad that the common thread among Paul supporters seems to be that the rest of America doesn’t know what we’re talking about.  And letting our enemies develop bases in our hemisphere does not bode well for our safety.

For crying out loud you dumbies, Newt is on record as saying repeatedly RIGHT OUT OF HIS OWN MOUTH that he LOVES BIG PROGRESSIVE FDR, POLITIQUE WILSONIAN WHATEVA, THE NEW DEAL and UNIVERSAL health!!!! So allllll of a sufdden he’s going to “change” just for you and become a Conservative Catholic?   GET REAL folks!  Have you even thought that he could be getting paid to “pose” just as Obama is???  Thats right!  C.Y.A. on BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE!!!, That way, the chance of winning would be doubled (for THEIR side!!!!)  ahahahahahahahahahaha  ahahahahahahahahahahaha   ahahahahahahahahahaha

Newt had 84 ethics violations? No, he was accused of 84 ethics violations by Democrats desperate to get rid of him. All but one of the accusations were eventually dropped. Regarding the undropped accusation: “The case primarily involved a course at Kennesaw State College that
Gingrich taught while in Congress. The organizers of the course
solicited financial support from “individuals, corporations and
foundations,” promising that the project qualified for tax-exempt
status. But the ethics committee concluded that the course was “actually
a coordinated effort” to “help in achieving a partisan, political goal”
— something that would run afoul of its tax exempt status. A further
problem for Gingrich was that during the investigation, he submitted
letters from his lawyers for which “the subcommittee was unable to find
any factual basis.” Gingrich “should have known” that the information in
the letters “was inaccurate, incomplete, and unreliable.”" — http://www.dailypaul.com/207820/gingrich-ethics-violations-what-exactly-where-they

I was distracted again..I’ll find it.

I wish that i could type as fast as this speech of Obama  tells lies. Glenn you tell the truth even if it leads to your death that’s part of a line from a movie. I like it. I will stand with you in telling the truth.

God bless Glenn.  He is standing by his convictions, by not buckling in to side with a progressive.

Ok, so you would rather have a “good” career PARASITE who likes to sit on a couch with the Wicked Witch of the House (Nan Pel-lousy), who thinks “Cap and Tax” was a good idea, philandering was wrong when Clinton did it, but it was OK for himself to do so (hypocrisy at its finest). Is that who you want? Or are you part of the Ron Paul Cult? I didn’t like McCain as the nominee, but he gained momentum after he won a few state primaries in a row. Actually McCain may have won if Oprah’s Minions and the Clueless 99%ers didn’t flood the polls and vote for Obummer. 

83 of those supposed violations were dropped.  The IRS, no less, totally exonerated Newt.  The only charge left arose during the investigation when one of Newt’s attorneys made a mistake regarding some documentation.  The $300,000 was to pay for the committee’s costs associated with investigating that particular charge.  Of course, the official IRS finding came too late to save Newt from the travesty of the reprimand vote.  You may not be letting your emotions rule you but your research stinks.  Check out Newt.org for answers.  If you have a problem with them, let’s hear about it.  I’m getting tired of catching the same pop-flies from Newt’s opposition.  Why don’t you come back with something new?

Newt lacks commitment and attention to detail as evidenced by his lack of effort to get on the Virginia Primary ballot. If he can not garner support from a few people in Virginia counties to get his name on the ballot, what makes you think he can possibly garner the support needed to win the nomination. I don’t want obama but I don’t want a President that can miss these types of details either. And by the way, based on some in-depth conversations with supporters, the belief is that Paul has a very passionate young following primarily because he wants to legalize pot. I’m not sure how accurate that is but I have personally heard him say two very disturbing things, first he said that NOTHING we have done militarily overseas has made Americans safer and in a debate he said that employers should NOT be punished in any way for hiring illegals. 

Boy oh boy….that guy from DC is slick.     Words from the Republican playbook.  Republicans have to clap, otherwise Mr. O will say , look at them, they hate the American people.   Covers all his bases, lying through his two front teeth and living up to S.Alinski’s vision and strategy for the American people.
His speech says, “vote for me and you’ll see a brighter future.”

Placing finger in mouth so I can vomit.  Excuse me please for my classless rant.

Paul’s views are generally attributed to those of non-interventionism, which is the belief that the United States should avoid entangling alliances with other nations, but still retain diplomacy, and avoid all wars not related to direct territorial self-defense.[*citation needed
*] Paul is quoted as stating “America [should] not interfere militarily, financially, or covertly in the internal affairs of other nations”, while advocating “open trade, travel, communication, and diplomacy with other nations”.[204] Ronald
Reagan spoke in support of Paul’s foreign policy views in the early 1980s, stating “Ron Paul is one of the outstanding leaders fighting for a stronger national defense. As a former Air Force officer, he knows well the needs of our armed forces, and he always puts them first. We need to keep him fighting for our country.”[ 205] Daniel
Ellsberg , famous for releasing the Pentagon Papers , has said of Paul in 2010: “On foreign policy, on the Constitution, on Homeland Security, on intervention, he speaks very well.”[206]Ohio Democratic Congressman Dennis
Kucinich has said that he
and Paul “agree tremendously on international policy

Well, you certainly disagree with Glenn then.  He thinks a dogcatcher could beat Obama this year.  I, however, rely on the fact that Newt has a better record of winning than Mitt, he is more honest than Mitt, he is more conservative than Mitt, he is a MUCH better debater than Mitt, and he is just plain smarter than Mitt.  Rick is okay but needs more seasoning.  He still looks like a kid.

Some say Newt had 84 ethics violations. That is not true. he was accused of 84 ethics violations by Democrats desperate to get rid of him. All but one of the accusations were eventually dropped. Regarding the undropped accusation a site says:

– ‘The case primarily involved a course at Kennesaw State College that Gingrich taught while in Congress. The organizers of the course solicited financial support from “individuals, corporations and foundations,” promising that the project qualified for tax-exempt status. But the ethics committee concluded that the course was “actually a coordinated effort” to “help in achieving a partisan, political goal” — something that would run afoul of its tax exempt status. A further problem for Gingrich was that during the investigation, he submitted letters from his lawyers for which “the subcommittee was unable to find any factual basis.” Gingrich “should have known” that the information in the letters “was inaccurate, incomplete, and unreliable.”‘ –

It would seem that the charge was in an extremely gray area and only a highly partisan bunch, out to get Newt, would have found it to have been an ethics violation. For Romney to treat their the episode as proof of Gingrich moral turpitude is remarkable.I would post the URL of the site, but last time a did that my comment disappeared.

“vote for me and you’ll see a brighter future.”

That’s what Hitler kept saying. Over and over and over until the country was totally destroyed.

A minor point at such a moment but..what is Grandma talking about?  You used the possessive with a noun: 
T H E I R.  It’s correct.

The ethic charges were all dropped with the exception of one, that he excepted a deposit from a publisher on a future book.  He repaid the money.  How about Charlie Rangel he was brought up on ethic charges, but still has his seat in Congress.  At least he is going to retire this year.  I like Santorum, but I don’t know if he can pull it off.  He doesn’t have the charisma Obama has.

I can’t believe so many people don’t care about the fact that Newt Gindrich is a liar, a cheat, he is dishonest and has no integrity. He has proven that in both his personal life and his professional life.  We need a man as President of the United States that is Honest, truthfull, has integrity and has the knowledge we need to change  the progressive agenda Obama has been pushing.  Mitt Romney is that man. If people would check his life out closley, they would see he is pretty squeeky clean, he is a good man. He is exactly what we need.

Hi Keith, you’re right, on the decentcy meter, he is a 10.  I’ll even give this flip flop the benefit of the doubt and say if you reach his present age without changing your views/ values of a 30-40 year old, you’re probably stupid. 

However, just like it wouldn’t be wise to sent Mother Teresa out to do battle with Attila the Hun, you don’t send someone who simply cannot stoop to Chicago syle thuggary to beat Obama.  Moreover, why would you sacrifice Mother Teresa if you have a worrier, who thrives on conflict ready to do battle.  If at the end of four years, we don’t have to keep him, but right now, we need someone whose tough as nails. 

Also, consider the fact that when someone considers themselves to be independent, that does not mean they are leftist.  That means they want to stand back and determine exactly what type of weapon will be required to serve our country’s needs.  These people are as fed up with Obama as the Tea Party. 

However, I think you have to agree, Santorum and Romney simply don’t have the political savvy to come out in the type of fight that will be required to win. It is going to get ugly.  Think about it.

A dogcatcher would beat you too then.  God bless Mitt.  He is MUCH better than FUDGE NEWTON, MUCH more honest than FudgeNewt, MUCH better looking than FudgeNewt, MUCH smarter than Newt the blow horn, MUCH more likable, MUCH more charitable, and MUCH more admired than FudgeNewon will ever be.

I missed the NJ incident, but more and more, Christi and his brother are looking like the same kind of cat with different stripes.  I don’t like their strong arm tactics. 

AMEN BECK YOU ARE RIGHT ON SPOT AND THIS FROM A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN WOMEN WHO SEES GRINCH FOR WHO HE REALLY IS TOO. NOT GOING TO BE OUR NOMINEE AT ALL! NOR ANY OF THESE OTHER RINOS EITHER

Glenn, my feelings against Barack Obama and big shot politicians are very personal.  I think your saying that it isn’t personal when you talk about them is not fully truthful.  This is the first time in my life time that I had such animosity towards those who would destroy America.  From your FOX  show I had gotten the same was true with you.  Now I am not so sure.   I am sick and tired of the idolizing of Hollywood, radio, or television stars.  All are regular human beings with a propensity for multiple mistakes.  They are shoved down our throats all the time.  At least Newt was willing to speak for the little people.  We are tired of being told what to think.  I thought I would throw up today listening to Shephard Smith talk about the great dinner at the White House.  Ordinary people don’t know what Sea Bass is to eat.  What’s wrong with serving what the masses have to eat…say catfish?  Everyone on the low end of the stick can see what is coming.  Obama isn’ the only idiot starting a class war.  All of you great teachers are!!  I am so tired of all of the lies and hidden agendas.

yup!  I’m taping it, material for future reference.  The chameleon in action-stunning, absolutely stunning.

whiteir_disqus:  Your comments aren’t backed up by facts, Romney is far more conservative than Gindrich, Beck’s comments about Gindrich are factual. Romney is not a liar, tell me what you think he has lied aobut, he is not a liar. Gindrich isn’t that great a debator, his is just someone who knows how to play up to the audience, that is why he was complaining that the audience didn’t get to cheer in last nights debate and because of that he didn’t do that good. There won’t be very many debates in the Presidential process, 2 or 3 and that is all. Gindrich has way too many skelitons in his closet.  The only thing Romney is guilty of is working hard and showing that the American way of free enterprise and Capitalism works and anyone can be succesful, he can make that available to all Americans. Romney has been far more successfull than Gindrich, check the facts. Obama wants to fundamentally change America, Romney wants to return America to being great and following the constitution.

DavidG…As to your post that Ron Paul has accomplished nothing.  It is far more important to have done the right thing in life, than to accomplish something that is wrong.  Congress has accomplished many, many acts that were wrong.  This congress has the lowest approval rating of any congress in history.  So, most of us feel they are accomplishing some thing that is wrong.  I am voting for Ron Paul.  He is the only honest one of the bunch.

I don’t always agree with Glenn but this time he is right on the mark. NAFTA, Healthscare and Global warming….Errr Climate change are just a few of many things that prove Newt is another media/establishment lackey. It’s quite simple, why do we want another media/establishment lackey to replace the one we already have? That just does not make sense.

Ron Paul
sits back, says nothing, votes no and campaigns in an effort to build a
constituency.   This tactic is consistent with his
recommendations on foreign policy.  You
make friends, but work from the sidelines. 

The charges against
Newt were dismissed, but they achieved their purpose because Newt was silenced and
the drudges of Congress lived to fight another day.  How many of those turn coats are still
there? 

With all
that Obama has done, if charges were brought, can you honestly believe he would
be found innocent of every charge.  I
think not.  Don’t drink the cool aid.

Newt’s
problem is he does not give a flip about political correctness or the upper
crust establishment of the GOP.   Sadly they
are more interested in the status quo than in saving our country. 

Well said! One thing people who say that fail to realize is that it’s the other people in Congress who are not doing to the right thing. Ron Paul has tried, but the rest will not follow his lead.

Why would you think that a more “conservative” candidate would challenge an incumbent? Not going to happen. We have this election to get it right or we will probably be in the middle of civil war 2.0.

How many “faiths” will be represented there?! Unfortunatly many.    But unless ALL have  repented and confessed that Jesus Christ is their savior, the gates will be as far as they get.  Jesus said No one gets to the Father except through Me!   LUCK, my friend has nothing to do with getting into Heaven.  You need to BELIEVE in JESUS as YOUR personnal SAVIOR!  
As far as your prayers go tonight,.. His word says the first prayer He hears is the prayer of repentence and acceptence of His Son.  Then, and only then, all other prayers are heard when prayed in His name, Jesus Christ.  This is not I that says this but the Lord.   

Before making such a strong accusation concerning  Spencearific statement, do some homework, and maybe even look at the site he posted.   You may be surprised at what you find.

NUMBERS 6:24-26

That is not a correct statement. The only one that can win is Ron Paul. He is the only one that can get enough Independents and even some democraps.

Hi Folks,
 
I guess we’re all watching the “thespian-in-chief” tonight.  When is he going to stop the fairy tale about what caused the housing crisis ?  Sure the rank & file financial system contributed to it, but it started in Washington – I know – I spent 35 years on Wall Street – beginning when it was difficult to get a mortgage (I know – my first mortgage was @ 11% rate fixed for 30 yrs. with a 20% cash down payment – and I worked for a bank !)  So what happened ? 
 
FDR wanted a checken in every pot — our Congress wanted wanted a house in every portfolio and a car in every garage no matter the ability to pay == certainly it’s much more complicated than that, but that, my friend is where it began.  The politicians just had to tinker with the most pristine of lending / borrowing vehicles in US history – the home mortgage.  When you had lending & borrowing rules /regs around the home mortgage, yes, these loans were bundled into “securities” and sold to secondary investors and were always rated AAA by the rating agencies mainly due to the strict lending codes.  However, once Confgress got into the act, and the lending parameters deteriored, the quality of the “security” for end investors also deteriorated unbeknowst to them.  The rating agencies failed – It has always been a mystery to me that the rating agencies were never called to task for rating an issue AAA when the underlying transactions – loans were clearly subprime.  Then of couse the mortgage lending market was opened up to brokers – no longer just your local bank.  So, tell me, why should anyone be surprised that the bottom fell out ?
 
The once, pristine, AAA market, of US Mortgages was doomed, forced to open up the housing market to people who could not afford to own a home, therefore introducing poor lending practices by institutions that had no business being in the business.OK, I could go on, because there is more to it than this — but you get my drift.  No, Wall Street is not totally innocent, but clearly there is plently of room for blame to go around. 
 
Oh, and while we are on the subject, the Dodd-Frank Bill does not introduce anything new.  These regs are for the most part already on the books – they just need to be ENFORCED !
 
Sorry – I just got to this point in Mr. Obama’s speech –
 but this class warfare nonsense has just got to stop ! 
 
Again, I still believe Mr. Romney is the best bet and the hope of the country both domestically & internationally going forward.  Sorry If I digressed too much on the financial issue –
 
Best regards,  Jan
 
“Always Hopeful On Long Island”
 
 

So you never lied or did nothing wrong ? Your perfect ? You forgive Glenn for being a drunk and deadbeat in his early life. So you are a sheep in a fence bursts up depending on Glenn your master to inform you. Read an article he turned me on to about the media herding the masses and controlling them. Lol. He’s doing what he preached so against on fox it’s sad. I think it’s called the herding of something. The propaganda guy who’s uncle was the famous shrink. He sold propaganda to all about anything. Well Glenn has a bunch of sheeple worshiping at his house. With all the stories I read or see with Glenn I notice how he’s doing exactly what he preached against fir years. Fox news has also changed fir the worse. That’s why I’m a liner and di my thing my way but lawfully and respectfully.

Newt/west 2012. Sarah energy czar to piss Glenn off and the left.. Lol

Mitt Romney has`nt worked in the Last 10 yr.s!  Him and his band of lewtting Buddies at Bain Capital Zero`d in on Companies that were slowing down a little and swooped in like a vulture and started picking away at it`s  finances till the company whent Bankrupt!!  that`s why Romneys` made Millions every year while everybody around him is going broke!! Not too mention how may “Hard Working People” lost their jobs as Romney keeps stacking his Millions! Romney will only make himself Richer and the Rupard murdocks (OWNNER of FOX NEWS) Oil Companies, Insurance Company Big Wigs. It`s fine if you got the hot`s for the guy and he`s got the perfect Normon Rockwell family and all. The Romneys of this Country do one thing above all else, THEY ARE TAKERS!! that`s why they have all the money and the rest of us have too struggle day after day just too keep our bills paid!

ad nauseam..barf!   The “mine fuhrer” rant again? His best yet, say the pundits.

Not everyone is watching, I can not stand to hear that guy’s lies any longer.

it was torture!

I can only imagine.

Yeah, I am one of those “Ron Paul cult members.” I believe in our Constitution and Bill of Rights. I do not like establishment lackeys, like Romney. The funny part is you actually think Romney is the answer. If Romney is the answer, it must have been a stupid question. People like you hate Ron Paul because he would finally make you take personal responsibility for yourself. You can not have that…

HINT: NEWT GINGRICH CANNOT AND WILL NEVER BEAT OBAMA; JUST AS MITT ROMNEY AND RON PAUL WON’T. RICK SANTORUM IS THE ONLY CANDIDATE LEFT WITH THE VALUES SIMILIAR TO RONALD REAGAN. IF YOU DID YOUR RESEARCH ON GINGRICH; YOU WOULD AGREE WITH ME AND GLENN. HERE IS A VIDEO FROM JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY TO HELP YOUR CONFUSION… http://blip.tv/libertynewsnetwork/the-real-newt-gingrich-3832846. YOU CAN FIND IT AT http://jbs.org. 

Why don’t you conservatives wake up and support RICK SANTORUM?  He is the only conservative remaining in the race!!  And he is what America needs – NOT NEWT & NOT MITT & Hell No NOT RON PAUL.

Why? Maybe because he isn’t the true conservative you like to make him out to be. Ron Paul is the only conservative in the race, PERIOD.

BLA,BLA

BLA,BLA,BLA

BLA,BLA,BLA

Ron Paul is greta on theeconomy and I fully support his views that the FED should be abolished.  But his foreign policy will get us nuked by Iran and islam terrorists who want to destroy the western way of life.  If Ron Paul had a realistic view on foreign policy, he would have my vote……And to your point YOU are wrong about Santorum – He is far more conservative than Ron Paul.

I have been out of touch lately for physical reasons and am just now coming back in to see what is going on politically.  I am listening to Beck on Gingrich.  so who does Beck support for President.

Thanks G. My thoughts exactly. I always like Santorum but you’re right about people willing to vote for Mitt. Who knows, maybe we will be surprised and Santorum will win the nomination and win the election. Yes, I can dream! Let’s keep our fingers and toes crossed. Yes, I agree it will take many years to get out from under the mess Obama will leave us after 4 more years. I just can’t believe people could be that dumb to re-elect him. Totally insane!! have a good evening.

Ohh come on!!  That’s what people said about Ronald Reagan.  Newt can get elected.  Stop saying he can’t.   He will mop the floor with Obama in any debate any day of the week!  Sure he has a dark past, but at least he’s not a radical “Saul Alinsky” advocate like Obama is. 
We all know Ron Paul is the real solution to our problems, but the guy is too whiny.  If he debated in a more secure and more masculine character more people would pay attention to him.  I wish the GOP would stop criticizing him about his foreign policy. 

SO PRO ABORTION IS OLD NEWS? MAYBE TOO LIBERALS LIKE YOU ! THE ONLY REASON YOUR FOR ROMNEY IS YOU VOTED FOR OBAMA, HE SUCKS! WHICH IT TOOK YOU 3 YR.S TOO FIGURE OUT!  BUT BECAUSE YOUR STILL A LIBERAL, YOU WANT ANOTHER ONE! YOUR OBVIOUSLY FOR GUN CONTROL! BECAUSE YOU SAID ,”THAT`S OLD NEWS” A REAL CONSERVATIVE WOULD NEVER SAY THAT! WE HOLD THAT RIGHT DEARLY!  SO TAKE YOUR LIES BACK TOO MSNBC AND TELL CHRIS MATHEWS WE WILL SEE HIM ON ELECTION DAY!!  PS. IF ROMNEY IS SO POPULAR, WHY CAN`T HE WIN AN ELECTION?

Oscleal– that is the problem with Newt. He will mop the floor with Obama and come off like a mean-spirited, angry man which people will not like and that may make people feel sorry for Obama and re-elect him. Newt has too much of an angry and uncontrolled side to him. What he says could likely backfire on him and that would mean Obama wins and that would be DISASTER!

Newt did NOT have 84 ethics violations – the democrats were so threatened by him and were so sick of him getting in the way of their agenda as speaker that it took them 84 ATTEMPTS before they finally found 1 stupid thing – they charged him and if you ask me it was just a pacifier to get the (D) babies to stop their flippin crying.  Get your facts straight before you start running amuck in the mouth or fingers - main stream media does it enough for all of us – lets start setting the records STRAIGHT  so we can all move forward. 

Newt’s baggage has already been opened – examined – and now forgotten.   Let “a dead dog lay”, to keep kicking it won’t revive it

love your pup but have to disagree with your comments – have you looked in your wallet lately – NOTHING could make me or a majority of the voters feel sorry for Obama – he has his roadies and that’s about it and by the end of his last 364 days !!!! that number will shrink even more – Newt will debate the Constitution back into existance.  Go to Newt.org and check out his page of what he plans on doing his first day in office – overturn the Keystone Pipeline bill is one – he’ll get shovels digging and the list goes on.  He also has a page with the facts of all the lies people are continuing to spread including Glenn and a lot of others on this blog.  I am so disappointed in Glenn – of all the mistakes he’s made in his past and we have all forgiven him and not held him to his past – I understand he’s not running for President but he is influencning others decisions.  When are we going to start looking at what is being said NOW instead of what may or may not have been said and done 10-20 years ago.

Some females are against Newt because he left his wife for another woman…which is no one’s business but Newt’s

Newt is a LOT worse than this article indicates. I do think Glenn takes it Newt more on the air, but I can’t afford the insider thing.

There is enough on Newt in this one ink to sink him if we can get it viral. I’ll add a few more for good measure.

Gingrich:

http://www.newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh121.htm  

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niRK-sZg5jY&feature=related

 

http://tinyurl.com/7v43okr

 

http://libertyfight.com/articles/2012/newt_the_new-age_fruitcake.html

 

 

 http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin606.htm
 

http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=36799

 

Newt, CFR member:
http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/CFRMembers.html#G
 
http://infidelsunited.com/articles/309/newt-gingrich-is-a-member-of-the
 
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd449.htm
 
Newt & Romney on single payer.
http://tinyurl.com/4xbajmk
Here is a quote from Newt’s mentor, Alvin Toffler, from a Toffler book, The Third Wave, Newt was saying the House members should read. Quote from P2 of 1st link I left above.

” Toffler
believes mankind is entering a new system. To the founding fathers in
his book, he wrote, “For the system of government you fashioned including
the very principles on which you based it, is increasingly obsolete, and
hence increasingly, if inadvertently, oppressive and dangerous to our
welfare. It must be radically changed and a new system of government invented,
a democracy for the 21st century. For this wisdom, above all, I thank
Mr. Jefferson who helped create the system that served us so well for
so long, and that now must, in its turn, die and be replaced.” ”

SamFox

 
 
 

The best candidate we had was Michelle Bachmann. Remember how the public reacted when the male candidate crossed the stage to hand Hillary a sheet of paper? The dems would have had to go easier on her to avoid that type of image. I forgot who he was that was running against her but it seems in this weird world of ours it is still un-cool to be aggressive with a female candidate. She was an insider and that is true but she knew the in’s and out’s of Washington and honors the Constitution of the United States. After her the only one with the light on and somebody’s home is Rick Santorum but I fear he is too much of a gentleman to deal with obamas methods. It’s a sad day for America right now and I pray things turn around before its too late. Glenn is right about Newt, he is as progressive as they come and almost as much of a nightmare as McCain. His mistake was to muzzle Sarah! He should have given her free reign! I think Santorum and Bachmann would be a great ticket!

athrun, how is Ron Paul a prog? Did you mean Santorum?

Ron is the only Constitutional conservative running.

SamFox

A non vote is a vote for obama; but I can’t justify any of the candidates we have presently except Rick Santorum. I fear we just may have no choice in who the Republican candidate is. I think it’s already been decided. It will be which ever one is a member of the CFR. This election is going to be the most difficult we’ve ever had. I am certain Ron Paul is not squeeky clean either. Nobody is perfect.

ElPzee you’ve got it completely wrong.  Newt is the most likely candidate to lose to Obama and the media knows that.  People are confident about his being able to win because the media hasn’t let loose the arsenal of factual historical information about Newt that reveals he is a Progressive just like Obama is a Progressive. 
He just isn’t much different than Obama and the media knows that.  That is why noone from the Democrat side or media side is attacking Newt.  They know he is lying and they want him to be the GOP’s choice because when you put Obama & Newt side by side there isn’t a whole lot of difference and they think they can beat that.  But when you put a staunch conservative next to Obama the difference is glaring.  The polls show people want the values of a conservative!  That is why they have systematically eliminated all the real conservatives in this race.  Santorum is the lone survivor and he will make it if people vote based on who is and what he stands for.   If you want to see a landslide get Santorum in there.  But if people have to choose between endorsing Newt or Obama???  who knows?  The only thing the polls tell me is people are afraid.  They want a victory but what does a Gingrich victory get them?  A victory at the polls and epic failure as a country.  Newt is doing the same thing to America that Obama did last election. He isn’t who he is says he is.  It is all lies, lies and more lies, just to get into office.  And if he has to lie to get into office and he doesn’t feel bad about doing it then what will he do as President?  Look what Obama did.  I am not voting based on fear.  I am voting based on who is the real conservative in this race.  And character matters in so much as I want to know they are who they say they are because when they are sitting with the power I want to know they share my values.

teddyb, problem is, Newt, like GWB as a candidate, is only imitating Ron Paul. Ron has been saying we should get rid of DOE & other burroacracies for years, not months.

GWB ran on some of Ron’s platform. Smaller govt, humbler foreign policy, lower spending…how’d that work out? 0 the lied as well.

MAYBE Newt is really a new man. BUT!!! That ‘maybe’ is not worth gambling the nation on. You must look up Gingrich’s record. I left a lot of it in links in an above post.

Newt does NOT have a conservative record that can back him up. His few conservative ‘good points’ are heavily out weighed by his liberal progressive work.

Ron Paul does have the back up. He has been doing & saying the same things for some 30 years.

SamFox

Keith,

I frankly very much agree with you — Mr. Gingrich has had his day — his families, his number of wives, his problems etc.  To tell the truth, while I actually lke the man and I respect his intellect, he is not presidential material, in my opinion.  When I was in college, I would have loved to have had him as a history professor and today, I would even go so far as to say I would vote for him as a Representative or Senator (ie; the legislative branch of govt ) in Washington.  However, I draw the line at the Executive Branch of the government.  As I have stated before, he is definately not what this country needs or wants and frankly I believe the country will take the chance of voting in Mr. Obama again to the executive branch with the hopes of trying to contol him through the Congress - legislative branch. It’s surely a gamble, but it is rather along the lines of going with the “devil you know…”.

Mr. Romney, in my opinion, as I’ve stated before, is the most likely Republican candidate to defeat Mr. Obama – even Ms. Coulter recognizes this fact.  Let’s be honest, if you find an “electable candidate” that you agree with 75 + % of the time—- that’s pretty darn good.  You should seize the moment and go with that person.  As opposed to someone you agree with 98% of the time, will give you a very entertaining debate, but has little chance of beating the incumbant.  The choice is pretty easy to my mind.  Remember, the presidency is only 1 of the 3 branches of our government.  Mr. Obama, however, seems to be hellbent on circumventing the 2nd or legislative branch whereever and whenever he can — that my friend is a very big difference.

Please think carefully and weigh the pros & cons of each candidate.  There is much at stake here.

Best regards,  Jan

“Still hopefull on Long Island”

Will someone PLEASE tell me what is wrong with Rick Santorum?  Santorum has no dirt in his closet, he is a good Christian family man and he DOES have a good record. He made a couple of bad votes while in office but sometimes the leaders put enough pressure on them to force a vote one way or another.
I would vote for Santorum over Romney or Newt. 
Santorum can hold his own with Obama in a debate too. Someone, please?  

Let’s chill people.  Anybody BUT Obama.  Absolutely anyone.  I like bits and pieces of all the Republican candidates and I despise bits and pieces of them all.  I didn’t vote for McCain in 2008 as I was being a purist – that got us 4 years of that dope smoking, crack doin’, otherwise do nothing Presidente Obama.  I may not like Newt, or Paul or Santorum or even Romney, but I will throw my hardline conservative creds to the curb, donate the maximum and harangue everyone I know to vote for the “more conservative and less socialist candidate” in 2012.  Hopefully, we can then move that candidate to the right.

You don’t have to like Newt…or plan to sit around and have a beer with him. If he can do the job, that’s all that matters. Do you want your best friend to be your parent? Or do you want someone who has your best interests at heart to be your parent? Same thing here with politics. Obama is touted as a likeable, charismatic guy. But he can’t, won’t, hasn’t done the job. So forget about whether you like Newt or Mitt or Rick or Ron. Have any of them convinced you they can do the job when you look at their records? At least we have their records to look at.

Mary R, Ron Paul is the only true conservative running. The others are in varying degrees continuations of 0bama the way 0 is a continuation of GWB.

Ron is the only candidate out side the Big Govt Party. The BGP is becoming more big govt, increasing the police state, are control freaks who want to dictate our lives.They over spend to feed the military industrial complex the blood of our youth & the treasure of the nation,  as fat cats reap the profits from undeclared & un-neccessary wars.

Go to Youtube & look up

Judge Napolitano on Ron Paul

Southern Avenger on Ron Paul

Michael Scheuer on Ron Paul

SamFox

GBTV — The truth doesn’t live here anymore. I’ll bet it killed Glenn when Art Laffer came out for Newt on Glenn’s show. Glenn, you need to return to the desert for more meditation.

And another thing… All of these candidates have been scrutinized, demeaned, raked over the coals, investigated, probed, you name it. And yet Obama hasn’t. Let’s see all the muck you can rake on Barry and then we can talk and compare.

Yeah, because all the things our government has done doesn’t deserve any backlash. Propping up dictators, having military bases around the world, bombing people at will and invading thier countries couldn’t possibly have any effect. This is the exact thinking that got us into this mess in the first place. You expect everyone else to take responsibility for the things they do, but our government has done a LOT of things that they and us, as citizens don’t have to take responsibility for. Ron paul IS the most conservative in the race. He realizes that we live in a free country (for the moment) and others have a right to believe as they will. People like you think you have a right to shove your beliefs down everyone’s throat, well, you do not. Santorum thinks the same way. Santorum also supports NAFTA, the biggest American job killing bill that exists.

Maybe it is that simple for you, but I will not vote for another establishment lackey. I will not vote for the “lesser of two evils.” That kind of thinking is exactly what got us into this mess in the first place. Why vote for another media/establishment lackey. I will vote fr the Consitution and Bill of Rights.

Ron Paul 2012.

Some of that may be true, but what if I do not like the record of some of these guys? Then what? Vote for another media/establishment lackey because his name is Obamao? No thanks.

Glenn has been aiming his guns against everyone but Romney – the one who actually signed restrictive gun laws and mandated health insurance (and they sure as heck didn’t launch massive protests back then with all the socialism charges like they threw at Obama).  Frankly, I think your allegiance to the Mormon church and belief in the White Horse prophecy is why you’re doing everything you can – except come out with a direct endorsement  – to take out all of Romney’s rivals so he’s the last man standing.   I believe Romney  will buy this election as he can, and every single one of Glenn Beck’s followers will vote for him – even if they’re holding their noses the whole time.

I pray America awakens.

That’s why this story says you’re not voting FOR a dem or a republican – you’re VOTING AGAINST “progressivism” (the 5 syllable boogeyman).  I have to hand it to you Glenn, you’re going to deliver about 3 million votes directly to Romney.   Propaganda paid for by Fox.

But how did he get a –what, 97% voting record for conservatism? The contract with America sounded like today’s Tea Party. He’s an old school power politician/insider–yeah, THAT scares me–but is he really lying through his teeth…does he plan to hoodwink us given the current political climate? Frankly, the Tea Party screwed up big time by not forming a separate party.

Glenn, you are 100% right.  And if Obama gets reelected it is no ones fault but the failure of the Republicans that cannot seem to put up a real challenger.  I am just amazed how Ron Paul DOES without backing down everything that the Republican party stands for, and more, yes some that the Republicans don’t like, but he is more the Republican stance than any of the rest, yet that cannot even understand that he does not want to commit war, without Congress, just like the Constitution says.   I am so DONE, I will never vote for the lesser of two evils again, and if that means I have to vote for a third party candidate, at lease I can look myself in the mirror with pride for my convictions.  Everybody wants change, hence we got Obama, well change takes the courage to vote for the right candidate, not the one that you just think can beat the other one you don’t like.  I do not want any progressive, not Mitt, not Newt.  Ron Paul is the ideal, and I cannot speak well enough yet about Santorum.

Glenn, you are one of our great teachers of the truth, please never stop.

You, obviously, don’t have any clue what you are talking about. Glenn has been endorsing Santorum. I do not always agree with Glenn but I do like the guy. That does not mean I will vote whomever he says. In fact, he has already said he doesn’t like my choice, Ron Paul. I am still going to vote for him in the primaries and the general election, regardless of what Glenn says.

I an not voting against anything. I am voting FOR the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Ron Paul 2012.

Its time to de-complicate this whole mess with clear understanding. The battle is between the spirit of man against the spirit of God Almighty. Obama has proven to be a spirit of man leader again in his speach tonight. The same as communists or socialists that believe that by a strong ego leader that is so convinced and unshakable in himself and his own ideas, even if the nation is turned into a large ash heap of hell, as socialist ego leader Adolf Hitler did to the powerful nation of Germany in the 1940s, He will not back down until America is reduced to a ash heap.
The leader with a spirit of God will bring back the pricipals that this nation was born into.
To give the freedom for all to grow and become unlimited in prosperity of all kinds not just financial.
A good example of the Glory of Americas freedom is the Joy a good football game still brings.
Why because it is still truth live on the feild, no one knows who will be the final Victor, but if you had a government that put federal money into the presidents favorite team because he thought they needed his help to compete, it would destoy the great truth and excitment of the game.
 

If anyone seriously believes Newt can beat Obama you need to see Newts disaproval rating of 53% which is 10 points higher than O’Bama’s. The middle does not like him and without the middle, people we get 4 more years of O’BAMA. Face facts with a national disaproval rating of 53% you don’t win, you don’t get elected dog catcher. I for one will be one very unhappy camper if alot of stupid people make him our candidate and we get our butts kicked next november. Oh and I don’t want to listen to people for the next 4 years after that gripe how bad it is.

Watchman, how does the parable of the wheat & tares fit into your PTR?
Matthew 13 start at v 24.

Especially the way Jesus defines who is taken & is not in verses 37-43. What does “…grow together untill the harvest..” mean & who gets pulled out 1st.

The time frame is given by the Lord in verse 39 as “The harvest is the close and consummation of the age,…”. Which is when the end comes.

 Also see a companion set of verses in Hebrews 12:26-28 

How does Revelation 13:10  Revelation 14:11-13  fit? If you check Strong’s Concordance for the NT word ‘saints’ you will see that there is only one original language meaning for ‘saints’ in the whole NT. There is NO indication of modifiers that lead to ‘tribulation saints’ in the Book Of The Revelation or any where in the NT.

Jesus Himself said “he that endures to the end”. Matthew 10:22 Matthew 24:13  Mark 13:13  The PTR is not the ‘end’.

Yeshua told Martha the resurrection would be at the last day. He repeated this a few times. John 6:40  John 6:44  John 6:54  John 12:48 
1 Corinthians 10:13 This verse is the only NT definition for ‘escape. Father will help His children, Colossians 3:12
There are no verses that would lead one to believe, on their face, that Jesus is coming 2 more times that equal only one advent. That stuff started in the US in about 1935, there about. The teaching was brought from Scotland by John Darby & spread in the Schofield Reference Bible.
The new to the church teaching was based on a vision by a lady, Margaret McDonald, who’d had a vision & Darby worked it up from there. It was not taken from the scriptures. The scriptures were interpreted, using Eisegesis,  to say He was coming 2 more times. There is no possible way to say there are 2 more comings of Yeshua Messiah using Exegesis.
What is “Exegesis” vs. “Eisegesis”?

[from https://gotquestions.org/support.html ]

You cannot show one verse that backs up the PTR without saying ‘thus we must conclude’ or other Eisegesis based terms. In ohter words, the teaching is not taken FROM verses, it is superimposed ONTO them.

I have been studying this subject a while. Nevertheless we don’t need a rapture, we need a strong relationship with the Holy Spirit, Yeshua & Father based on a strong knowledge of the Bible.
 Then it
will not matter if you are right & I am wrong or vice versa. We will
be ready for what ever happens.

SamFox

I have my dream ticket (which does not include any one of these guys) but you have actually put the perspective on this better than I’ve read yet.  And I’ve read a lot!!  I still feel like an election orphan..but I really appreciate your interpretation of these two men.

I have been watching Glenn Beck over 2 years now.  I became his best admirer.  I could depend on him to tell us what was really going on in congress and with the president etc.  Now, we had someone to tells us the truth, this opened a whole new world to americans.  The computer, vidio pictures, fox news, all these things give us back control on congress and the president. People like Brightbart and Glenn looked “behind thescreen” to tell us information.  I felt this was going to change things.  We can see past, present and future speeches, with a rerun of a vidio, lies become facts we can see!!!!  What happened to that Glenn?  I know from you about how we must be friends with Isreal ect.  I agree!  I know from you that God is important in and for America—God is in my life alwaysl   But why aren’t you keeping us informed about how the house has pasted over 12 bills that are laying on the Senate floor (not brought to a vote) because Harry Reed will not bring them to a vote. How come President Obama is running the house and senate when that is not according to the constitution!  Why aren’t you informing us the cost to tax payers every time the president and family go any where, especially when he goes to give speeches at $35000 a plate!  Why do you not keep us in formed about facts about our congress men and women like Senator Scott Brown denying he was a Tea party candidat(they helped him get elected) yet all of his votes have been for the democrates and Obama!  These are just a few thing the old Glenn would be keeping us up to date on. I feel you have a right to tell us facts  about the republican cadidates but tell us and let us be the judge!  Please keep in mind you said Obama must be repaced—we get that, but please go back to keeping us informed about the things that really matter so we can be in charge of our government  etc.  By turning the light on to goverment secrets and corruption we, the american people can make informed judgement and change.  Please go back to the old Glenn Beck sincerely Cheryl C, Fl.

I couldn’t agree more with EIPzee. I stopped listening to Beck some time back. He is not alone in pretending to be a “conservative” and an Obama reject-or.,but every word out of the likes of Beck,Rush Limbaugh, Mark Steyn, Hannity, et al, is uttered in order to destroy the Republican candidates who are not “PERFECT” by their egotistical standards. After the last three Presidential campaigns, I am convinced that these pretenders are really Democrat “Moles”, whose only mission is to get democrats elected. 
  What I get a laugh at are the call in listeners who “suck up” to the talk show hosts and try to outdo them in blasting Republican candidates. I would classify the women callers as being among the worst.  ”Rush, I love you, you are my first thought in the morning and my last thought at night.” One guy called in and his opening line was, “Rush, you are my “god”. 
   It’s obvious that these people take five minutes to watch CNN and three hours of Rush and think that they know politics cold. Of course, “Snerdly” , under orders by Rush, chooses to 
put them on the air.

Sam, I oncur with your conclusion: we need a strong personal relationship with Jesus the son, God the Father and the Holy Spirit in which we are fully submitted and surrendered to Jesus as our Lord, King and Master in everything. Beyond that, I am still studying and still learning concerning end times prophecy and in no way claim that I am a theological expert, but I’m a very thorough and committed student. So having said that, permit me to try to answer your questions.

I believe Jesus was explaining that the parable of the wheat and the tares explains how true Christians and those practicing false religion can look much the same and even be members of the same church, at least for a while. Then in Matthew 24:40-41 Jesus explains that in the catching up or Rapture, two people will be side by side and one will be taken and the other left behind. So the way I understand it, there will be a sorting process at the Rapture in which the frauds will be left behind and eventually be tossed into hell and finally hell will be thrown into the lake of fire after the Millennium. The timing of being tossed into hell is not necessarily prior to the PTR the way Scripture reads.

As to Hebrews 12:26-28, my footnote to those verses explains that the unshakable kingdom which will remain is the kingdom of God; all else will crumble and be destroyed. So we ought to build our lives on the solid foundation of the love of God, Jesus and His Holy Word and not get distracted by the stuff that will crumble.

Revelation 7 describes those who are to be raptured (I don’t understand the 144,000 to be a literal number but a very large and complete one: 12 X 12 X 1000). John writes the story chronologically, so by Rev. 13 & 14, John is referring to the saints who became saints AFTER the Rapture occurs, even though they are not distinguished with a separarte label as tributlation saints, that’s indeed who they are.

Jesus did say he that endures to the end will be saved, but He was not being so exact as to describe the specifics of those few saints who will be raptured while they (we) are still living. for the vast majority of the saints, this means until we die. he’s not referring to the end of the world in the context surrounding Matthew 10:22, he’s referring to the end f each saints’ life on this earth.

The “last day” that Jesus refers to in John 6:40, 44 and 54 and 12:48 when read in the context of the verses which precede and folloow these verses appears to refer to the day of the Rapture. Remember, this is not the Second Coming of Jesus. That comes later, when He returns to earth. In the Rapture, He comes in the clouds and with a loud trumpet blast calls first the dead in Christ and then the living to rise to meet Him in the air. See 1 Thess. 4:14-18 for the best description of this coming event in scripture that is commonly referred to as “the Rapture.” 2 Thess. 2:1-12 goes on to explain what events or signs must precede this event. Wars and rumors of wars, false prophets, signs and miracles, and earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes have all occurred. the rebellion in verse 3 is the Greek word apostea, from which we derive the word apostasy or falling away of believers in the Church. That has clearly happened almost everywhere I know of where I live. So all that must happen before the Rapture occurs is the man of lawlessness (aka the Antichrist) must be revealed. I’m guessing a bit here, but I’m guessing we will see that event occur sometime this year (2012). Once that happens the Rapture could occur at any time. It’s not clear to me whether this implies a PTR or perhaps a mid-Trib. Rapture. It really does not matter. It’s out of our control in any event and the real issue for us is will we fully trust God and believe Him? As for me, the answer is a definite “yes!”

I hope you find some of this helpful. That’s how I intended it.

Glenn Beke is backing Romney because Mormons stick together.

That is why Glenn and Pat and Stu are so frustrated.  So many people keep saying that Rick is their first choice but they are going to vote for Newt because they think he will beat Obama.  If everyone that like Rick would vote for him instead of someone else, he could get some traction.  Listen to the callers on the show that say Rick is their 1st choice but.  This is the time to check them all out, get everything out in the open on all of them and then get behind the person with your values.  When it comes to the general election, we all put everything behind the GOP nominee.  We don’t have to settle yet.  Like Glenn said he would vote for the sole of his shoe against Obama.

Glenn supports Rick – Do you have a clue what church he supports?

The ethics charges weren’t dropped, Newt made a plea bargain, copped to one charge and paid an enormous fine.  Innocent people don’t do that, especially those with a spine. Then Newt announced he was stepping down (before a total revolt from his own caucus kicked him out of his leadership position) and resigned from the House AFTER just having been re-elected.  The man is personally and politically corrupt.

You ask how is Newt’s past more destructive to us than Obama?  Aside from being irrelevant (you don’t want to nominate anyone as bad as Obama unless you are an idiot), Newt has done plenty to destroy America, Obama is just the latest schmuck to add to the mess Newt helped to create.

Newt DESTROYED Reagan Country and turned it into Mexifornia with his MULTIPLE amnesties for illegal aliens, by then being miserly with funding for our border protection resources and, by blocking an earlier version of the E-Verify system from becoming mandatory, instead of merely voluntary.  The lion’s share of illegal aliens resided in California.

Adding insult to injury, he allowed the Clinton Administration to run a citizenship scam just ahead of the 1996 elections where over one million aliens were given US citizenship just in time to vote for Clinton.  Many of those given citizenship failed their tests, failed their background checks, had no background checks done at all and jailed criminal aliens were even given citizenship in violation of the law.  Of the million plus aliens granted citizenship, again, the lion’s share lived in California — we had two of the citizenship fraud mills in California, the only state so blessed.

Newt pushed both NAFTA and then Most Favored Nation (MFN) trading status for Communist China.  NAFTA gave us more illegals as their agricultural workers lost their jobs (after we dumped our ag products into their markets) and headed to the US to find new ones.  How many US jobs did we lose to NAFTA?  I remember , “that giant sucking sound” quite well  Then we get the hit from MFN for China?  Not only did the jobs outsourced to Mexico end up going to China (meaning more migrating illegal Mexicans) but OUR remaining manufacturing started heading to China, too.  How many trillions do we owe China, now, thanks to Newt?

And, if you think that Newt wouldn’t do as bad or worse things as Obama, you haven’t been paying attention.  Newt believes that he is a law unto himself.  Anything Newt wants is a-okay with him.  If that means ignoring legislation and ruling by executive order, oh well.  If Newt wants it, it must be done.  He is a sociopath and we don’t need another one of those in the Oval.  Pick another candidate, Newt is not executive material, he is dictator material.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eyeB36ctO5I  

“I think you can write a psychological profile of me that says I found a way to immerse my insecurities in a cause large enough to justify whatever I wanted it to.” Newt Gingrich 

Why doesn’t NewsMax include the only woman contender? It seems that RNC is slanting reporting. Where is Michele Bachmann?.  We don’t need a choice between Obama and McCain (Newt), we need a choice between Fascism and the US Constitution.

Rick Santorum

I was so sure that Romney was the one who could and should win.  Then I saw him on Fox News with that horrible interview and body language when asked how he could reconcile his purported opposition to “Obama Care” when it was modeled after his own state’s position..  He acted like, “How dare you ask me that!”  He was absolutely  INDIGNANT at the interview.    After that,  I waited for this brilliant,  wealthy,  extremely well-educated,  Northeastern elite to show us that he was the one who could lead the country and get the country out of debt.  I had total faith in him.  I waited.  For weeks.   NOTHING happened except endorsements.  Nothing happened from Romney but a  projection of the feeling of entitlement.  WHEN  WE  FINALLY  DID  HEAR  HIM  SAY  SOMETHING,  HIS  SPEECH   WAS  HESITANT–ALMOST  STUTTERING,  AT  TIMES.  INARTICULATE!!!   TOTAL  DISAPPOINTMENT  AND  UTTERLY  DISCOURAGING.   THIS   MAN   CAN  NOT  HANDLE    A  CONVERSATION  WITH  OBAMA,   LET   ALONE  A DEBATE!!!.  If  you think that the criticism of George W.  Bush was bad,  just wait until you hear the ridicule that the Democrats are going to levy against the Republicans if and when Mitt Romney is elected.  George Bush actually performed far better than Romney has so far.  THIS  TIME,   I  WANT  SOMEONE  WHO  CAN  ARTICULATE  THEIR  POSITION.   NEWT  GINGRICH  CAN  DO  THIS.   I also agree with him on what he did for this country in 1994.  My hispanic housekeeper even agreed.  She said that they–meaning illegals–aren’t coming up here much anymore because they don’t  pay  them  for the babies.  Amazing.  People do what they are rewarded for.  When will we ever get it! 

Newt is un-electable.  Aside from the fact that he has “no boots on the ground” in many states, he will be buried in so many negative (but truthful) ads that he will lose BIG TIME and take the down-ticket Republicans along with him in defeat.  Like Newt, the Democrats are vindictive creatures and they have not forgotten or forgiven him for Jim Wright, for their route in 1994 and his Clinton impeachment hypocrisy.  Unlike with any of the other Republican candidates, the fight against Gingrich will be very, very personal for the Democrat Party.  And, they have at least a BILLION dollars to use to get their revenge — not to mention the huge piles of cash their allies will be spending for the same purpose.  If Newt is the nominee, four more years of BO.  Here’s a preview of things you will see in some of those ads, a whole hour’s worth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eyeB36ctO5I  

Bachmann quit and went home to run for her congressional seat.  They don’t poll for quitters at NewsMax.  .

Santorum is Roman Catholic.

So simple, so clear. I really don’t know how much clearer should Glenn be for his skeptics and haters to get what the deal is. Progressivism is a disease, and Newt Gingrich supports it wholeheartedly. End of story. Truth has no agenda.

Glenn, I’m with you, but I’ll throw Santoro in tha basket too. I never thought that I would say this. Ron Paul is the best of the lot. Like you I don’t want just to beat Obama, I want a president that will fix the problems. But I think, and I’m not a big thinker. That te only way to fix things is to give Obama anothr 4 years, so he’ll destroy the country so completely that we’ll have to start from scratch, and then by the grace of God a leader will rise from the ashes and we can rebuild the country as the founders intended. Since Paul will not win the nomination I’ll  sit this one out.

Problem with Glenn’s rendition is…it is not true.  Gingrich did not resign in shame over ethic charges.  After the ethic charges that flooded his office, he was re-elected Speaker for two more years.  The ethic charges themselves were a joke…83 of the 84 were dismissed…the one that wasn’t (a minor tax violation) he was cleared of by the IRS a few years later.  Gingrich was no more run out of office for ethic violations than Sarah Palin was. 

Santorum comes across as a little too pious and judgemental for my tastes.  I find he also appears like a little boy on stage.  He turns me off when he starts attacking the others.  He can’t connect and therefore, can’t win in the general.

Santorum is the only one who’s a true conservative with integrity and morality and yet he’s not embraced because he’s not a polished politician like Newt is.

But Paul will add more problems like his pansy-like foreign policy, his desire to legalize drugs and a belief that the military should basically be gutted. He is as dangerous as Obama in some ways. 

that’s because he has a little conflict of interest. Google Beck, Hannity, Rush, …etc… and ties to Bain (Robamney’s company) they own Clear Channel….Are you getting the bigger picture yet??? You will.

Ron Paul blames America for 9/11. He uses the same narritive as Al-Qaeda. “if we

weren’t occupying their land they wouldn’t have to attack us” Excuse me? Ron Paul is an

insult to the American People, clueless on Islam, a threat to our national security and a

public disgrace. He’s a dangerously demented old kook.

Everyone has problems but at least these individuals are trying to rid our country of the plague known as obamaism, a plage that has infected our socioety with socialistic ideas similar to those of Hitler, Mao and Castro. Awaken America and see the evil before it is too late. Obama and his slaves who blindly folllow his radical agenda are no different than those socialists who followed evil in the past. If Obama is elected for the second time along with  Pelosi, Reid and the other democratic followers of Marx and Lenin then our once great country is doomed to fall just like Rome and other once great dynasties from within not from without. Only God can deliver us from this evil but maybe American is so evil that it is too late no matter what. Remember that the Bible proclaims that evil rulers are judgement for evil people and that God sets up rulers/leaders and also knocks them down. Let’s pray to God for forgiveness and beg for him to heal oor land.

Obama has the spirit of antiChtist as do all who refuse the saving grace of Jesus Christ.

Ron Paul is a lunatic. Anyone who says that we should allow evil rulers to operate without any intervention or wants to allow druggies and dopeheads to use their illegal drugs is too much for me to back for any office.

Ron Paul in 2012 and the destruction of America in 2012. They go hand-in-hand

That is the only solution as long as we are praying to the true God.

Or radio station owner??? Google Bain, Romney, and Clear Channel.  Gee wouldn’t it be something if a presidential candidate owned an entire media???

You clearly don’t know much about Romney.  Here are the facts:
Romney’s historical success as a candidate is very poor.  In 25 races he’s competed in, he’s only won 9 (those races include primary races that he’s competed in, but exclude caucuses). 
In an article entitled Overestimating Romney, Jonathan V. Last reported in The Weekly Standard on December 19, 2011 that:
 
Romney lost to Ted Kennedy in a 1994 Senate race by 17 points, even though 1994 was the best year for Republicans since the early 1950s.His supporters claim a great victory of a Republican in the blue state of Massachusetts when he ran for governor.  But they don’t mention that he was the fourth Republican in a row that Massachusetts elected as governor.  And his victory was shallow receiving less than half the total votes cast. His approval was so low in Massachusetts that he could not mount a successful campaign to get re-elected.  His dismal performance gave the Democrats the governorship back for the first time in two decades. 
According to the Center for Small Government, Romney was not the cost cutter he claims to have been.  During his one term as governor he increased the state budget from $22.7 billion to $25.7 billion.  And there was additional spending of $2.2 billion that the legislature took off budget.
 
They go on to say that “the actual impact of Romney’s tenure as governor was a huge increase in state spending.”  And then they say that in Massachusetts under Romney “for every one government job created, two private sector jobs are lost.”
 
Romney’s record is to the left of many liberals.  He doesn’t connect well with the electorate which is proven by his inability to get much past his 30% poll numbers. His personality comes across as mannequin-like making many feel he’s either cold or aloof with no real understanding of what average Americans feel.
 
Those aren’t the characteristics of a candidate that one would select as the best choice to beat President Obama. 

No Emily09, he didn’t.  83 of the charges were dropped for having no merit.  The other charge was for teaching a college course at Kennesaw College in Georgia and Democrat David Bonior alleged that Newt MIGHT HAVE used it for politically partisan purposes and violated IRS rules.  But in 1999 the IRS ruled that Newt did nothing wrong and the course was perfectly valid and so was the way the money was handled.  The $300,000 Newt paid was not a fine, it was a reimbursement of expenses the House spent on the investigation.   

Clearly you don’t believe in redemption either.  You say he’s a liar, and he certainly was lying to his past wives when he had affairs. However, he has more than a decade in a solid marriage now with no rumor of infidelity, he joined a church and went to God and his family and sought forgiveness.  You’re putting yourself above God if you won’t forgive someone when He will.  The issue isn’t if someone did something wrong, it’s whether they changed their life.  Newt’s record since his claimed change is solid.  But Emily09, I guess you know better than God does about forgiveness and who deserves it. 

Newt has been an open book in this campaign and willing to answer any questions.  That’s not the mark of someone who is hiding things. Just yesterday it was reproted that Nancy Pelosi said she knows things that will keep Newt from being president.  Newt might not be president, but I’ll give him credit that in an interview after she said it he was asked about her statement and he said she should bring forth whatever she has.  That’s not the actions of somebody trying to hide something.

Glenn is right that Newt is a bigger government guy than some other people.  But the fact is that it’s either going to be him or Romney, and Romney has a far worse record (see my reply above to another commenter about that).

Get the facts straight Emily09 before you start slinging mud.

Christianity is.

Mitt Romney is Obama-light. Mitt Romney is “the guy who lost to the guy who lost to Obama.” McCain is my senator and I can’t stand him. Mitt Romney is, like McCain, a millionaire completely detached from what the rest of the country is going through. I am an Independent and I never liked him. Santorum I like and he has gotten better at debating but I don’t see him defeating Obama.  We all know Ron Paul is “the nutty old doctor.” Sometimes you have to make a deal with a lesser devil, and if we want the Obamas + Moochelle’s Big Momma out of the White House and out of our pockets, the choice is Newt Gingrich.

I used to follow you on Fox TV whenever I could; now I’m disappointed in you. What I am grateful for, as a Jew, is your support of Israel.

Most women are smart enough to know it takes two people to ruin a marriage.    They also know, if a marriage is in trouble, they were culpable in the destruction.   Not in all cases, but in the majority.

oh you had him on your show, you’ve had dinner with him and even have his books signed by him….. history shows then that you like newt gingrich… i call you a liar… lol, so easy. but then everyone who has a lick of sense knows you’re a lying shuckster.

If Newt Gingrich were being nominated for sainthood, many of us would vote very differently from the way we would vote if he were being nominated for a political office.
What the media call Gingrich’s “baggage” concerns largely his personal life and the fact that he made a lot of money running a consulting firm after he left Congress. This kind of stuff makes lots of talking points that we will no doubt hear, again and again, over the next months.
But how much weight should we give to this stuff when we are talking about the future of a nation?
This is not just another election and Barack Obama is not just another president whose polices we may not like. With all of President Obama’s promises, glib demagoguery and cynical political moves, one promise he has kept all too well. That was his boast on the eve of the 2008 election: “We are going to change the United States of America.”
Many Americans are already saying that they can hardly recognize the country they grew up in. We have already started down the path that has led Western European nations to the brink of financial disaster.
Internationally, it is worse. A president who has pulled the rug out from under our allies, whether in Eastern Europe or the Middle East, tried to cozy up to our enemies, and has bowed low from the waist to foreign leaders certainly has not represented either the values or the interests of America.
Against this background, how much does Newt Gingrich’s personal life matter, whether we accept this claim that he has now matured or his critics’ claim that he has not? Nor should we sell the public short by saying that they are going to vote on the basis media talking points, when the fate of this nation hangs in the balance.
Even back in the 19th century, when the scandal came out that Grover Cleveland had fathered a child out of wedlock- and he publicly admitted it- the voters nevertheless sent him to the White House, where he became one of the better presidents.
Do we wish we had another Ronald Reagan? We could certainly use one. But we have to play the hand we were dealt. And the Reagan card is not in the deck.
While the television debates are what gave Newt Gingrich’s candidacy a big boost, concrete accomplishments when in office are the real test. Gingrich engineered the first Republican takeover of the House of Representatives in 40 years- followed by the first balanced budget in 40 years. The media called it “the Clinton surplus” but all spending bills start in the House of Representatives, and Gingrich was Speaker of the House.
Speaker Gingrich also produced some long overdue welfare reforms, despite howls from liberals that the poor would be devastated.
In a world where we can make our choices only among the alternatives actually available, the question is whether Newt Gingrich is better than Barack Obama- and better than Mitt Romney.
Can you name one important positive thing that Romney accomplished as Governor of Massachusetts?
Can anyone? Does a candidate who represents the bland leading the bland increase the chances of victory in November 2012? A lot of candidates like that have lost, from Thomas E. Dewey to John McCain. Those who want to concentrate on the baggage in Newt Gingrich’s past, rather than on the nation’s future, should remember what Winston Churchill said: “If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost.” If that means a second term for Barack Obama, then it means lost big time

Glenn,

Newt is the best person to lead in this atmosphere.  Think about it, who speaks to and motivates an alcoholic to go the high road.  It is someone who has been there and done that.    There are alot of people entrenched that will not start moving in the right direction without the right leadership. 
 Newt has good positions for leadership out of the current mess, I am not sure the others won’t get swallowed up and we end in a stale mate.

Sometimes it is not all or nothing.  We need to move in a positive direction, and what you want may be everything we all dream of and not what is doable. 

As far as Newt’s past….what about yours?  Mine?  He without sin, throw the first stone.  I see in Newt a capable man with passion for this country to be healthy.  He is someone who sees the best in others and looks for talent, skills and abilities that can be utilized for production.  We need to stop throwing stones and start rebuilding the house.  Knock it off Glenn, …I didn’t think it was possible but you are turning elitist and turning me off.  I am one of your most outspoken fans. 
You can hate progressivism and alcoholism knowing that they are diseases and overcommers get past what has afflicted them in the past.  I believe Newt is in a repentant state as are you.  Yes, there are some areas where any of us do not yet see ….and we are ALL still growing.  Some in a positive direction and some not.  If you look at Newt’s life now, he has a beautiful stable family life and is a productive provider.  He uses the avenues available to him and does so with conviction of his principles, …. Wh ich are much better than in his younger years when he was being tempted in every direction, not knowing he could be burned.  Though he got close enough to the fire to burn, he didn’t…he learned It Is Hot and has a beautiful family that he loves to be with….he is not going up in flames Glenn. 

We need a New President,  we need a strong opposing candadite who CAN WIN and then deal with the trash.  If you have been there, you have discernment and skills. …Newt is the Guy…get over it. 

I watched Glenn when he was on Fox & if anybody knows who the true Progressives are it is Glenn!! They are in both parties!! Why is it so hard for for you to understand that they are just assuring they stay in the White House? It’s their Back Up Plan. Doesn’t Obama give beautiful speeches & say all the right things? Newt says all the things that they know we want to hear too, that doesn’t mean that once he’s in office that he’ll do it. Does Obama do what he preaches? The on thing I just can’t understand that if Glenn is so upset about Mitt & Newt that he doesn’t come out & put his support as a private citizen on Rick Santorum. He says he likes him, but he has the opportunity to really help him. If he’s truly worried about the direction of our country than why doesn’t he do more than just run down the other two? If he truly believes that Santorum is the best for our country than do more than say I like him. Campaign for him!! It would give him such a boost! He is just fading away like Michelle did. Glenn you have the power to help & your ranting about Newt is not going to do it!! If you believe this much that Newt is a Progressive & say you will continue to fight them than do something man!! Your personal support to Santorum, being at a function with him would be the best fight you could give against the Progressives!! You have the influence! Use it in a different way than just ranting. Santorum needs you. Our country needs your to help! You see what is happening. A lot of people like me can’t get your GBTV & have lost contact with you, but you still have a huge amount of people that believe in what you say they just don’t see or hear you any more. If you don’t do something different, they are just going to vote for who they think can beat Obama & be fooled again. You need to make it personal & get behind Santorum if you truly believe that he is best for our country. Get out there & let people see you with him. I don’t understand why your not!!!

Newt scares the sox off me.  I’m sorry, but I do not trust a man who cheats on not one, but two wives, and the drags around his latest trophy who’s younger than his eldest daughter.  He’s a great debater, but once confronted with his past peccadilloes, he won’t have a chance in the general election.  I felt the same way about Guiliani.  He always had that skank hanging on his arm as if he were about to bolt.  I had a brother who was a tail chaser, wife beater, and fathered nine children by three wives.  He left a trail of destruction, and though now dead, his legacy continues to harm his survivors.  People like Gingrich are basically flawed and i don’t care what he’s had to say to his preferred deity.  The damage has been done and he is responsible for the effects.

Rush understands the reasoning behind the SC vote, Glenn doesn’t address that. Glenn Beck lashed out in anger at people living and voting in SC, which saddens me because I agree with the ideas he puts forth.

We voted for Newt because he was the only one  articulating conservatism and has some fight. I know people point to Santorum, but any man who lets his good name be tarnished and smeared across Goggle for 10 years has no fight. Romney, yeah, he’s a liberal and cannot defend conservatism. That leaves Dr. Paul, which I admire some of his ideas, but he really needs to move to the Libertarian Party and extol their ideas.

That left us in SC with Newt. He was the only one we saw willing to stand up and fight back the MSM that’s been fibbing for years. And he articulated a case for conservatism in a sound way. We in SC wanted to send a message, more than anything, to the GOP- we want these ideas articulated by the candidate. How else were we supposed to do it? And… ANY GOP candidate is going to be scrutinized and smeared.

Here is the link to Rush’s take: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/01/23/newt_is_a_vessel_he_won_south_carolina_because_he_articulated_conservatism

And part of the transcript bellow; it wasn’t complicated for us in SC  to choose, so why doesn’t Glenn understand out message?

Rush Limbaugh:
I’m just telling you, Juan Williams, John King could have asked the
same questions to any other Republican and it woulda sunk ‘em, because
none of them are willing to articulate conservative. Maybe not Santorum. 
Santorum probably coulda hung in there.  Now, this presents a huge
stumbling block potential for Newt.  He is vulnerable on the very thing
he can do better than anybody else.  He had better fully embrace his
conservatism and not make it a part-time thing.  The days of being able
to keep this momentum going by ripping on the media are over.  The
standing ovations for taking on the media are over, or they have a very
short life span.  He can’t live on that anymore.  Been there, done
that.  It’s gonna get old and it’s gonna look like it’s been set up. 
There’s not gonna be any drama to it, therefore there’s not gonna be all
that spontaneous “way to go” standing O stuff, unless it’s just
outrageous.  You only go to the well so many times on this stuff.

Now, Newt keeps pushing off any questions on his anti-conservative
statements.  And he better not.  I think Newt is just as vulnerable on
his anti-conservatism as Romney is on Romneycare.  “What do you mean by
that, Rush?”  Very simple.  Newt has made it plain two or three times
that he’s very open to the concept of man-made global warming.  He can
blow this by sitting on the couch with Pelosi again or something that is
equivalent.  Newt has in the past had some unflattering things to say
about capitalism.  His time at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is a
vulnerability. Saying that FDR is the best president, his favorite
president, that doesn’t jibe with being a conservative.  His open
support for single payer health insurance with a mandate.  I’m just
telling you, Newt’s not out of the woods here.  And Newt and his crew
had better understand that he’s where he is not just because of a media
smackdown, not just because of debates.  He’s articulating conservatism
when he does this stuff, and if he stops doing that or if he waters it
down or if he gets caught in an example where people can be convinced he
doesn’t really believe this stuff…

And finally, Rush at least voiced his confidence in us, unlike Glenn:

I trust the Republican base.  That’s who I trust.  I trust the
Republican voters.  I’m totally confident with them.  They are the
people in this audience.  Why wouldn’t I trust them?  They’ll figure
this out.  They’re not a bunch of brain-dead, mind-numbed robots.  This
is how democracy works.  It’s how representative Republicanism works. 
It’s what we’re trying to hold onto, for crying out loud.  You know,
only a little more than 1% of the population’s voted so far.  The
delegate count right now, Romney 31, Gingrich 32, Paul 10, Santorum 8.
There are 1,144 delegates needed to win.  We’re nowhere near being over
here.  I don’t subscribe to conventional wisdom, and neither should you.

When one considers the all around capabilities of Mitt Romney (read his book”No apoligies”) I believe he should be the next President. He has the best combination of executive and financial experience necessary to put America “back on track”. He will win the debates with Obama!  

Okay so lets just allow obama to get another 4 years because Glenn hates progressives.  I hate them too, but I hate obama more.  We can deal with Newt.  People change.  Glenn has changed from his old ways.  And by the way where is the candidate, Glenn, where is that candidate you would support. 
 

there are too many idiots in this country who will not support Ron or any constitutional candidate.  Hence obama as president, so its either a lite conservative or another 4 years of obama.  Americans cant take 4 more years  of a lyin african. 

yeah lets take christie’s word for it, the guy who put a muslim on NJs supreme court. 

Radical conservative idealism will get Obama re-elected!!!  PLEASE, you conservatives…understand that we cannot afford to pout and demand a candidate that is TOTALLY not a “progressive” BECAUSE AT THIS POINT IN OUR COUNTRY…THAT TYPE OF PERSON COULD NOT GET ELECTED!!!! (Even if we had such a candidate)
The “independents” are the ones that will decide, once again, this next election…
I don’t understand, Glenn, this blind side of you that I am seeing.  If not Mitt or Newt…then who the HELL will it be??? Obviously Santorium is no match for the Obama’s silver tongue, even if he could get the GOP to back him(which the grand ole party will  not!!)

The vast majority of people , on both political sides, are shallow, and will be looking for a “man” who can be their savior…someone to worship…so the GOP candidate must also have some of those devious verbal skills(we used to call it lying) in order to win over Oba.

hey the book sales and subscription to GTV and radio show would plummet if obama was out of office, a guy’s gotta make a buck, which is why I stopped subscribing. 

what dirt, who does not have dirt in his/her closet, come on Keith.  Everyone has dirt….its about today and the future, yesterday doesnt matter. 

Mitt couldn’t get past Huckabee the last time out and Mike had enough sense to know this one was bigger then him.  Who do you think Mitt is, really?

Where exactly is the documentation on the 84 ethics charges…because if there is anything we should all be aware of…..POST IT.  Let’s see how awful it really is.

I wanted to share this with you.

Welcome to Flight # 2012. We are prepared to take off into
the New Year.
Please make sure your Attitude and Blessings are secured
and locked in upright position.
All self destructive devices should be turned off at this
time.
All negativity, hurt and discouragement should be put away,
Should we lose Altitude under pressure, during the flight,
reach up and pull down a Prayer. Prayers will automatically
be activated by Faith.
Once your Faith is activated you can assist other passengers.
There will be NO BAGGAGE, allowed on this flight.
The Captain (God) has cleared us for takeoff.
Destination GREATNESS.

Be Blessed!!!

I like Santorum, but the atmosphere in Washington will not co-operate with him.  He has solid conservative principles that will not allow his concience to executive order his way to solutions as he sees it…  He will be in a stale mate even if he could win.

I am not a betting person but if I were, I would bet that Newt would have cabinet positions for Rick and Ron and Michele.  Newt sees talent and will delegate to people who are passionate to work on particular projects.  He is smart enough to know and has already articulated that he will need help getting it all done … I think if we elect Newt we will get the whole nut!  lol.  

I do believe Santorum is the only true conservative left in the race.  And yes, I do believe he could beat Obama.  Gingrich was for the mandate in Obamacare, and frankly, I do not trust him on that.  Then there is the case of his fooling around while he was a married man–I understand that is his personal life, but if you can’t be loyal to your wife and family, who can you be loyal to?  Then there is the case that he is a very smart man and has immense knowledge about all the issues of the day and how to fix them.  There is also the truth that he has a grass roots organization which he has had since Obama took office in American Solutions.  If you look at Rick Santorum, you see a mostly honest man–he stands on principle, and has not changed his opinion on anything such as Obamacare and pro-life, etc. since he does not base his opinion on the way society shifts their opinions, but on the way his principles lead him.  I want a principled man in the White House who will do the right thing according to his principles that is also an originalist when it comes to the constitution.  Newt seems to do a lot of his own thing on that score.  We have a choice to make if the constitution is to live and still remain in place–do we settle for a 50% who will move things in the progressive vein a lot slower than Obama, or do we choose an originalist who is not only in tune with the Constitution, but will do all in his or her power to follow the letter of the constitution?  If we want the constitution changed, there is a way to do it.

For further information, our illustrious House and Senate has tried to change the constitution 8 times in five or six years without our knowledge–just as a matter of fiat law they passed.
The following is information from a video on utube which has been removed.  Don’t take it as gospel, but research it to see how true it is or how false it is.  Here are the notes I took from that video before it was removed because they said on utube it did not follow policy????  I find that a bit questionable.  You decide after your research.  Folks you have to watch out for everything these days.  Now here is the info.

http://www.you tube.com/watch?V=H3aCfRBrmrv8 attempts to try to get rid of Second Article Section 2 Natural born citizen part.8 attempts  mostly democrats, a few republicans  22 monthselimination of the natural born citizen clauseJune 11, 2003, Vick Snyder–HJR159Sept. 3, 2003  John Conyers–HJR67Feb. 25, 2004, Don Nichols–S2128Sept. 15, 2004 HJR104Jan. 4, 2005–HJR2                Feb. 1, 2005 HJR15April 14, 2005 HJR42  Vic SnyderClaire McCaskle–Children of Military Families S2678–Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act, Clinton and Obama co sponsors of billIt goes into more detail about the Supreme Court and Alito being the only one who was not invited to the White House by the Obama administration.  Fishy, I would sayIt also highlights a lot more too.

I am with Glenn on not supporting any more big government candidates. My problem with Glenn is that he is supporting a big governmet candidate. At what point will the nation come to recognize that the Republicans and Democrats have nothing to offer with the exception of the one candidate they do not recognize. Life would be so much better if Ron Paul were President. Glenn, I hope you are reading this, shame on you for preaching the gospel on following the constitution and then completely blowing off the one true Constitutionalist in the race. You lost all respect from me and my patriotism.

This is not about you, so I don’t need to check your ‘activity’. In all his service to our country, Paul had only 1 bill passed, and that was to sell an old post office in Galveston Texas to the city for a Museum. He could have mailed in all his ‘accomplishments’…such as they are. And I kinda like Paul, he supports my conservatism, but he is not presidential material…yet!

Glenn you have stated some generalizations that could be
taken any way and certainly out of context? How do you make your assumptions
free from Newt’s years of service under Reagn and as House Speaker? How will or
will not you support Newt if he is the candidate, will you be as vocal? I will
not hold my breath with Ann Coulter?

Then Glenn, Have Newt on and show us! Give him the hard questions and show us.

Thank you Glenn;  Why people can’t see the great actor in Newt I don’t know!  I never liked showboat charm even in a younger good looking man.  I too, liked some of the lines he said.  He had very good timing & presentation, but I’ve always preferred good character in a person.  I have missed you on TV so much, so talked my husband into signing up.

NO.  A VOTE FOR NEWT IS A VOTE AGAINST OBAMA.  A VOTE FOR MITT IS A VOTE AGAINST OBAMA.  A VOTE FOR SANTORUM IS A VOTE AGAINST OBAMA.  THE FIRST QUESTION IS:  HOW DO WE GET ENOUGH VOTES AGAINST OBAMA?  SECOND QUESTION IS:  IF WE CAN GET A REPUBLICAN IN THE OVAL OFFICE, WILL HE STEER THIS COUNTRY AWAY FROM THE LIBERAL POLICIES OF THE LAST 40 YEARS AND REMAIN TRUE TO THE VALUES OF PERSONAL FREEDOM AND PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY?

NEWT MAKES EXTREMELY CLEAR THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSTITUTIONAL VALUES AND BIG GOVERNMENT.  HE GIVES VOICE TO CONSERVATIVE VALUES.  OF COURSE SO DO ROMNEY AND SANTORUM, BUT TO VASTLY LESSER DEGREE AND OF TOTALLY DIFFERENT TONE.

SANTORUM SEEMS TO POUT HIS VALUES AND POSITIONS AND MAKES HIMSELF AND WHAT HE HAS DONE THE ISSUE.  MITT SEEMS TO WANT EVERYONE TO BE HAPPY AND CAN’T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG…

NEWT TALKS ABOUT THE ISSUES, THE CHOICE  AND THE FUTURE.  AND ALL OTHER CONCERNS ASIDE (ELECT-ABILITY), I SUSPECT THAT YOU AGREE WITH THE ‘WHAT’ THAT NEWT ARTICULATES.

AS TO ‘DIRT IN THE CLOSET’, I HAVE NO DOUBT THAT SANTORUM AND MITT ARE CLOSER TO SAINTHOOD THAN NEWT.  NEWT WOULD TELL YOU THAT.  BUT WE ARE NOT VOTING FOR A POPE.  WE ARE CONSIDERING A PRESIDENT.

YEARS HAVE TEMPERED THE FIREBRAND NEWT OF THE 1980′S; YET HIS POSITIONS HAVE REMAINED THE SAME.  IT IS THOSE POSITIONS THAT WE CAN HOPE WHOEVER WINS THE NOMINATION WILL FIGHT FOR.

SADLY, I SUSPECT THAT OBAMA WILL WIN IF NEWT IS THE NOMINEE.  BUT THEN I SUSPECT THAT OBAMA WILL WIN IF MITT IS THE NOMINEE.  OR SANTORUM….  BUT NOT BECAUSE NEWT IS “UN-ELECTABLE”.  THERE SIMPLY ARE MORE OF ‘THEM’ THAN THERE ARE OF ‘US’.

P.S.  I’M SORRY GLENN…I LOVE YOU, BUT YOU ARE DEAD WRONG ABOUT NEWT BEING A “PROGRESSIVE”….

can’t take anything you say about beck seriously. when you come from the blog site “stopbeck.com” then your attacks against beck are just based on your objection to beck regardless of his view

i can’t respond to anything here as nobody is responding to the actual peice. all these responces stemfrom elpzee’s post. i will not comment on posts that are grown from this tainted source.

THANK YOU GLEN!   YOU ARE 100% CORRECT.   It terrifies me  to see that so many “conservatives” can be so easily led astray by Newt Gincrich.   America!  Open your eyes before it is too late.   Do not listen to the slippery smooth words of Newt Gingrich.  Newt likes to call himself a “historian”.  Read the real history on Newt Gincrich & learn from it.. 

Every time Rick Santorum he reminds of a child telling on someone else and and when he through his face turns red, whith that look of i either lied or crapped his  pants.  None of the
canidates are perfect but if i were going to take the lesser of the evils it would be Newt. This country doesn’t need a so called business raper, legal drugs,or fool  with a big ego.  We need someone that knows how our government works and can straighten out the Rape of Obummer.

ME, I Will Just Vote For The “LESSER EVIL “  REPUBLICAN  Glenn & His Cronies Are Starting To Sound Like Little Dictators ,Telling Every One Who To Vote For, & Why.. Newt
Was Not Sent Out In Disgrace, He Got Reelected Then QUIT… His Party Turn Against Him….
  I Like Glenn, Been Fowling Him For Ever, But It He Keeps Up His B.S. I Gess I Will Fine
  Some Where Else To Get My Info, With Out The On Slot Of B.S.

Glenn is right.  Newt Gingrich is a Progressive.  He belongs to the progressive organization ” The Council of Foreign Relations”.  They believe in big government and the New World Order and one global government.  Some of their other organizations are:  Tri-Lateral Commission and the Bildebergs.  The Council of Foreign Relations was founded in 1954 by David Rockefeller.  One of top Progressive liberals in America.  He also founded the Tri-Lateral Commission and is a member of the Bildebergs.  You can go online at any one of these sites and download their members.  The Tri-Lateral are the ones who groomed Obama for the Presidency and the Bildebergs put in motion in their secret meeting in 2007
where Obama and Hilliary were both in attendance.  Rick Perry was also at the meeting as a member (2003 to currently) of the Bildebergs.  If you follow the people and who their associates you get the picture.  The Progressives have canidates running in both parties so they do lose.  Gingrich the Progressive gets the backing of Rick Perry (a Bildeberg) and also Mark Sanford former governor of So. Carolina (also a Bildeberg).  They want him to face Obama, no matter who loses they still win.  David Rockefeller had said several years ago in  a interview the only person he was afraid of was Ron Paul.  I have checked out Mitt Romney, I cannot find him belonging to any of these organization.  He may have been a Democrat and then changed to a Republican, which by the way so did Ronald Reagan and he turned out to be one of our best Presidents.  He has the financial and economic skills this country needs before we fall off the cliff.  People do your research before its too late.

OK seriously, Mitt has no dirt? What closet are you hinging out in? Set aside the claims of Mitt being more a Wall Street Shark, levying and selling off jobs for the bottom line profit, you still have the huge Pink Elephant named, Mandated Healthcare Coverage, standing in the room trying to hide behind the sofa! Seriously! Mitt served as the model for the Pelosi/Reid/Obama grab for power!
I mean its pretty much hypocritical of conservatives to draw the line against progressivism, and yet, take comfort in their mandated social security entitlement, and their IRS enforced mandated health care reform! Thou Hypocrite. It puzzles me and as well, confounds me how republicans who claim to be God Fearing Americans resign so flippantly to vote the lesser of two evils, I mean at the end of the day, isn’t still evil? Or is it just me? I know this, I cannot speak for anyone but myself. I will not yield, I will not compromise, I will not relent! I want my liberties untouched thank you very much! I want for just once in my life time to see America NOT at war! I want to see America embrace the principles of liberty, and abandon this evil trend of authoritarian, and draconian mandates handed down by the republicans and democrats! Enough is enough!.

I’m having a hard time   trying to  get totally wrapped around glenn’s progressive stance and his anti-newt rants.  He    is creating a contradiction. The shear act of governing is a progressive tenant.   When we vote and elect someone to office  we contribute to 
progressivism .  Glen says I want someone who believes this or that. You should do this way, but I’m not judging you, and its ultimately up to you to lead your life. Given that , his Utopian society of  anti-
progressivism  would be no governmnent at all.(I’m not all against that given what’s been handed to us!) But even the founding fathers said it was necessary for an orderly society to form consensus and have laws.  Not everyone will always agree with the 
consensus .  When you have someone like Newt whose career spans many years, whose been in a leadership role,  having or coming up with ideas  ,and taking a positions are expected of that job. But, fortunately for us,what may start out sounding as a good idea, gets exposed as flawed  because it is an intrusion to freedom when examined more.They,[ideas], all are not going to be winners. We’ve all been there. Also, its unfortunate that all politicians success are judged by what they accomplish. And passing legislation has been the report card, but rolling back laws that would give us more freedom isn’t given the same weight. Its always what they are going to do” for you”not what they are not going to do for you that gets the press. But given Newt has walked back some populous and progressive ideas  by using the same logic all conservatives would use there is hope for Newt. I wish Glenn would keep working on Newt to move him more his way, and not just throw in the towel and blast him.

A PHD in History makes him an historian in my book.  As for his history…balanced budgets and entitlement reform….hmmmm, just what I am looking for!

 This is all old news….and Obama has outdistanced Gingrinch in every way.that is disgraceful, …so what are you saying…..that Romney is your guy???  that he can out maneuver Obama and win the presidency??  or Paul….his foreign policy is a joke…and while I really like Santorum….he will never be elected, unfortunately, because he is too genuine and honest…which is a clear indictment on our nation”s integrity.   we are in a battle against obama for the very fiber of this country….we need someone who is schooled in the ways of politics, of washington, and has facts and history at his fingertips to dispute the constand lies of this adminstration and president….Gingrinch is not perfect, far from it, but it will take someone with a strong personality and sense of self to send Obama packing….and I am sick of everybody criticizing everyone but “their guy”, because if we don’t vote as a block, whoever the GOP candidate is, we are doomed.  this country will bear no resemblance to the one we have [or have had], in the last fifty years…take your pick…Obama, or ABO.  and go from there.

With the possible exception of Ron Paul (foreign policy is dreadful; fiscal policy is good), I believe any of our candidates are better than Obama.  If you criticize them and antagonize people toward them – and they then become our nominee – you may have destroyed votes that will be needed to beat Obama!  I don’t like Newt’s baggage, but what about Obama’s baggage that no one talks about?  Bill Ayers, Tony Rezco, Larry Sinclair and possible cocaine use and homosexual relationships, the 2 Mafia-style killings of gay men in Jeremiah Wright’s church, including the choir director???  There’s much to be concerned about on the other side – let alone the disastrous policies that have us at a $15 trillion debt!

Glenn, why are you just now calling the number one GOP candidate a progressive and a  liar. Same with Mitt? Where were you months ago in telling us that these guys are just like Obama????? I am disappointed. It’s a bit late to start tearing down the GOP and its “for sure” candidates who will run against Obama. I have always been your biggest fan but now i am really ticked at you over this “new revelation”.

VOTER COMPLANCY

i respect Mr. Paul, and am glad he is on our side, but he is a man on an island. He has never been able to coalesce his  views for something into accomplishment or law.  By electing him to a position to where it will be even harder to do ,what would give you any assurance he would have success, now. Most his accomplishments that get  listed seem to stem from laws proposed that he is against. (not a bad thing!), but never from original proposals that he could draft that would nix these liberal socialists. I see him more as a reactionary, than a visionary.
He is a good soldier for our cause. What about him becoming Speaker of the House in the next term or Head up the banking committee?

and that’s just chapter 1

What is the real enemy conservatives need to fight against in the next election?
The real enemy is the MEDIA BIAS.

How could the media neglect to report on the March for Life in D.C.?
No suits and ties on the streets. Federal buildings all closed.
Just hundreds of thousands of college students, teens, and adults out there in a show of force.

Walked by an encampment on 15th and there were maybe 40 tents, no foot prints in the snow, maybe six men standing around.  Why do they get daily coverage? 

The media are controlled by the puppet master!

Glenn, wish you would be a little more honest, than saying Newt reigned in disgrace.  He was exonerated / cleared on all charges and the fine was immaterial.  If YOU know what Ms. Pelossi knows, let the rest of us know.  

As for being a “Socialist type Progressive”, I think not. Newt knows less government is what is needed and he is the  only person to make it happen … just as he was the only person who could work with Clinton to balance the budget.  YOU tie him to Teddy, Wilson and FDR … many older Americans think they did some good things and overall were what America needed at the time.  The term “Progressive” (ie. forward thinking, outside of the box thinking) is one thing, Socialism as preached by Obama is much worse.  Sure do wish you and Newt could sut down and talk through these issues.

As for Mitt, looks real presidential and is smooth as glass, but …  Like many NEasterners he lacks the ‘fire in the belly” and knowledge of tough times.  He was born with a silver spoon and has never had to really hustle to make ends meet or get his hands dirty to get a job done.  He is a classic “party perfect pick” with a rich mans outlook and probably ties to the IMF.  Until he can make the folks stand and cheer he is a just a high class loser!

The conservative movement is very confused and you are not helping folks see the way.  CONSERVATISM is lesser GOV, reasonable and fair taxes, state rights and unmitigated economic opportunity.  It has worked for a long time, but we are in the “welfare state’ and due to our absolute lack of knowledge as a citizenry it will be very hard to make it work ever again.

It’s gonna take one mean assed dude to shake DC at the roots … and Newt may be the only guy rough and tough enough to do the job.  He has done good work in the past, but as I personally can attest … when you get the job done, some folk get in the way and/or don’t like the way you get results ( some people get hurt, deservedly and undeservedly).  Cleaning up our corrupt bureaucracy will not be pretty or easy. 
  

“The real enemy” of conservatives are people like Glenn, who is “obsessively” going out of their way to destroy who could be the next republican nominee.  Isn’t that the liberals, democrats and Obama’s job???

Glen is not trying to destroy Gincrich.   Gingrich has done that to himself.  And Gincrich is not a conservative.  He is a professional politician and he says whatever he needs to say at the moment to gain votes. 

Yes any candidate would be better than Obama.  But if the Republicans choose Gincrich, the Democrats will be laughing all the way to the polls.  Gingrich has so much baggage that it will be easy for  Obama’s keepers will destroy him. 

Yes any candidate would be better than Obama.  But if the Republicans choose Gincrich, the Democrats will be laughing all the way to the polls.  Gingrich has so much baggage that it will be easy for  Obama’s keepers will destroy him. 

Well!  It seems that once again, we do  not have “the right one” for which to vote”.  I would like to hear from someone on Santorum.   He certainly has improved at the lectern & with the people since the beginning.   Is there anyone who will speak up for the Pennsylvania guy??

Yes!  Santorum is great.  Ethical, well spoken and ethical.   My concern is his ability to defeat Obama. 

So Glenn…now what? We don’t have a candidate..right…I think I like Santorum but he’ll never make it to or past the primaries…i guess we’re just screwed.  Why can’t we ever get a conservative candidate?  Four more years of Obama will be the last of this nation as we know it and maybe the world!  Got ant ideas to share..I don’t have high speed internet so I can’t get GBTV and can’t listen. Sure miss the old days with you on Fox!!

Clearly you have not read the Koran or anything about Islam.  Islam has been attempting do destroy and control the rest of the world for 1500 years, when their evil prophet  muhammed wrote the Koran with an invented THEIR FALSE God “allah”.  Islamists want to destroy other civilizations NO MATTER WHAT THEY DO.  American poicies haven’t created islamic terrorists. IT IS THEIR CORE BELIEF ANd THEY HAVE BEEN TRYING TO DO it SINCE MUHAMMED – THEIR KORAN TELLS THEM THEY MUST.  read some history before you Ron Paulers try to tell us america caused it.  TRY JEFFERSON AND HOW HE WENT TO WAR WITH THE BARBARY PIRATES 200 YEARS AGO BECAUSE THEY ATTACKED OUR SHIPS – ALTHOUGH WE HAD DONE NOTHING TO THEM.  YES, THEY WERE ISLAMIC EXTREMISTS.  i suppose ron Paul would have just let them be. 

Well somebody had better beat Obama or we’re doomed….to the world of George Soros…be it Newt, Ron Paul or Romney, we all need to start supporting the party to BEAT the current administration…They are just laughing at all you people that are bad mouth the party that needs take back the WHITE house.

Hey Glen,
Where’s your devotion to your fellow man and Saint.  Take a good look in the mirror and see what’s truly there!

You may be right.  Gingrich might be the only person that can beat Obama, but let’s say that happens.  How is that better?  Gingrich agrees with Obama on global warming, and the individual mandate.  He has a few things that are more conservative than Obama, but not by much.  He’s pro-life, but that’s really all I can think of.  I’ll go down flag waving before I’ll vote for a man simply because “he’s electable.”  Nancy Pelosi said we should get back to a place where elections don’t really matter that much because all the candidates believe the same thing.  I guess she got her wish.

No Newt for me.  I’m voting for the RINO, Romney.  Disgusting thought but my choices are gone.  Shades of John McCain all over again.  I am totally bummed out by the remaining candidates.  Ugh.

glenn i have watched your program fox for over 2 years.  You were like John the Baptist crying out the truth.  Now you are not that same man.  Our only hope to save America is if new tecknology  vidios. hand held, vidio phone with voicel  When people like Brightbart and Fox news and you Gleen show us what really is going on in congress and the presidency (be hind our backs and in secretl  Yes we need to stand with and protect Isreal,  we get it.  Yes we need God in our lives and in Ameican  we get that ( God is in my life and bless es me every day) But to turn this courtry around to the great country it was set up to be we must hear al the things being graffted be hind closed doorsl  We must weed out the evil and the thievies and con artists in our house and in the senate snd stop the president from legishslating  and acting as a dictator.. we have a check and balance SYSTEM  set up.   Only when you tell us whats going on can we the people TO act.   Only in the last 10 years has new tecnnolog y computuers( personnal computers, hand held cell ph. with picture ability, video camars etcl  These can record history and inlighten Ameicans to all the corruption behind the seens.  These can point out facts like senator Scott Brown denied he was a teaparty person right after he got elected then in every vote in the senate he voted for the demCRATES AND NOT WITH THE REPUBLICAN OF WHICH HE IS  ONE!   NO ONE IS POINTING OUT EVERY DAY THAT THERE ARE OVER 12 BILLs THE HOUSE HAS PASSED TO HELP FIX OUR PROBLEMS BUT  Harry Reed has not presented them to the senate for a vote.  This last one was not the house bill to extend the tax cut and go forward on  the Keystone pipe line.   the bill tHAT WAS PAST WAS ONE WRITTEN BY HARRY REE D(HE COND mITCHMICONELL IN TO WORKING WITH HIM AND SENTHAT BILL Back to the house AND THERE ARE ALOT  MORE ROTTEN THINGS GOING ON  we need you to use that new black board to keep us up on the real thingS! You have spent enought time on the republidcan candidates We can judge for our selves. As you know any of the top 4 must beat Obama so lets concentrate on that! Please be come our watch dog again  we need you to make the real changes back to the constitution and followingi= it completely,   We must get rid of zars and agencies that are appointed an are nottaccountable to the people( not made up of elect ed officials  lW   need our president to not act like a dictator)  Please Glenn help us rise again!!!!!

Is there any chance someone new will come to light during the convention?  Condi Rice maybe?

Santorum doesn’t have the gravitas….he looks like a young boy “telling” on the others.  He comes across as too pious and judgemental for my tastes.  I’m not looking for a messiah or moral leader…I’m looking for someone to balance the budget and reform entitlements.  Gingrich is the ONLY one who has done that.  If that makes him a progressive, then I guess I am as well.

I agree.  Looking over Glenn’s articles on Gingrich, they are filled with trash over who Gingrich likes as past presidents and cheap shots over his past marriages.  Beck’s priorities in presidential selection stikes me as odd and lacking.

I agree.  We need a fighter who will take on the media and the establishment’s propoganda.  It will be a nasty fight, but Gingrich appears to be the only one I’ve seen able to take the blows and come out swinging.  And he is the ONLY one to have balanced the federal budget and reform major entitlements.  Results matter.

Gingrich’s baggage has already been aired and thoroughly inspected years ago.  It matters little compared to our nation’s problems.  Besides, his baggage has gotten a little lighter…the ex-wife baggage didn’t work against him.

If Gingrich is so bad, then Beck shouldn’t have to lie about him.  Gingrich did not leave in shame over the ethic charges, but was in fact re-elected as Speaker for two more years after those charges were all dismissed but for one (a minor tax violation the IRS and Courts later exonerated Gingrich for).  Gingrich resigned when the republicans lost 5 seats and Gingrich didn’t have the votes to stay as Speaker.  I guess when Beck use to say “do your own research”, he was hoping we wouldn’t and just believe him.  I am very disappointed to see blantant lies and smears being pushed by Beck.  Report the truth, so the people can decide justly….unless that is not the goal you have…….  

Little PoPo, thanks for doing the homework that Glenn seems to have not done!  Good job, you are in the truth zone … Glenn is becoming what he has accused others of being … shame, shame Glenn.  Do your homework as you used to do and set the record straight.

GLENN needs to issue an apologize along with Mitt for the “resigned in DISGRACE” comment.  IT is WRONG and malicious …
                                                                                  thanks again, LAPMAN

Janice, some good points … regarding baggage of Newt as compared to a train full on the Obama Express, that has it all concealed and locked up … except for Reczko, Ayres, Wright and few others ( a commie named V.Jones, that Glenn has said is really a great GUY! now!!!
Wonder if GB reads this stuff, cause that last comment is akin to what he is trying to do to Newt ????  it appears that John the Baptist Beck is becoming Judas Iscariot Beck!

Somewhere I lost track of terms. What is the definition of Progressive as you are using it? Do you have a glossary, dictionary,  or whatever  some place I can go to for the up to the minute terms look up? 

I take issue with any elected official who exalts his position or esteems himself to “know what is best” or better than the people who elected them.  I sincerely believe that our current government workers (federal and state) and this administration are all corrupt and could care less about what is important and needful to the average American. We are on our own! We are living in challenging times and it is always the hard-working person, the weak, the elderly, and the vulnerable who suffer the most.  Our current elected officials are living the good life at our expense. They cannot feel what the average American feels because they don’t have to live “that way.”  I believe people need to wake-up and be alert…Our government is seeking whom they may devour.

Commit to Mitt! Governor Romney is a man of faith, family, and values. He would bring greatness back to this wonderful nation.

People, have we forgotten that the real enemy is sitting in the White House?

Did anyone notice that Obama is using the SEALs as his personal elite
strike force when his numbers need a boost? He did it with Somalian
pirates in the Maersk hijacking, he did it again with Osama Bin Laden,
he did it again with rescuing Iranian fishermen from Somalian pirates,
and he did it again to rescue two people kidnapped in Somalia who were
workers for a Scandinavian relief organization just in time to use it
for his SOTU address. This is a disturbing habit and I think we will
see events of this type increase when ever he is needing a boost in the
polls. He is literally killing for votes, and using the military to do
his wet work.

He commits these men to peril with no regard for their personal safety, because bullets are cheap, but his administration wants to do away with advances in military technology that can save our fighting men’s lives on the battlefield, as well as reducing the size of our conventional forces to the point that we can only deploy against smaller enemy nations with little or no capacity to put up a fight.

We need for him to be roundly defeated at the polls, but as long as we let the liberal media run the Republican candidate debates, ask all the questions, and publicly destroy candidates we will not accomplish the mission of highest importance – defeating Obama. Something is wrong with letting a biased media run the other party’s campaigns and take pot shots at the candidates without holding them responsible for doing it on Obama’s behalf. They start the feeding frenzy, and let us finish it while they point fingers. Personally I am tired of the media elite determine who we get to vote for, and while no candidate is ideal and I don’t expect them to be, I will vote for just about anyone who is not Obama or a democrat, or liberal.

 A few random observations. Early in the primary season in 2008, when it looked like Senator Hillary Clinton would be the Democratic nominee, I thought for sure, that would guarantee a Republican White House. Very few Democrats could marshall as much anger, resentment and agita among Republicans than Hillary Clinton. I thought that such agita would provide the incentive and drive for a strongly unified Republican effort. Then out of nowhere came Senator Obama who surged past Clinton to the amazement of all. At that time, he lacked a long enough track record to raise blood levels to boiling as did Hillary Clinton. With a lukewarm backing by his own party, down to defeat went Senator McCain.

4 years later, and Republican blood is boiling. The President’s track record is well known now; his job is there for the taking. Moderate Democrat and independant votes are there for the taking. I would suggest that few Republicans can get the Democrat blood boiling like Newt Gingrich. Despite their own dissatisfaction with their own incumbent president, they will mobilize against Newt. The often expressed” anyone but Obama” will be repeated on the other side and in the middle as “anyone but Gingrich”. For that and other reasons, I suspect that Mr. Gingrich is the President’s desired foe. It is a lot easier to contrast himself from Gingrich than from Mr. Romney. Gingrich has what Romney lacks–fire in the belly and a long history of belligerance to the Democrats. Will that fire ignite the Republican base, or will his other foibles drag him down?  A lot of Republicans are lukewarm about Mr. Romney–same result if he is the nominee as in 2008? Does Santorum as VP provide him credibility with social conservatives?

Internicine battles leave scars. Obama wins without a united Republican Party effort. So who ever gets the nomination, better back him.

Very well spoken

The only people who are going to get Obama reelected is the Gingrich supporters.This guy is a demon and he’s doing the devils work.

Dude he’s a liar and a thief, but he’s not the only one. If you support that is fine and I’m sure no one has to tell you that but at least be honest with yourself and admit what he is.

Glen, my heart is with Gingrich and Palin. The two connect well to bring this Country around. The thing is that Sarah Palin should be the President and Newt the VP. We don’t stand a chance in hell with weak minds fighting the big O. And nothing could be worse than four more years with this socialist moving full steam ahead into the making of another Greece where everyone is controlled by the Government in all aspects of our lives. He will abolish the constitution and put an end to freedom and choices. Please do US a big favor and talk to Mrs. Palin.

ok…i wanted to respond to your actural comment when you responded to my earlyer responce….but i can’t seem to find it. so, here it is. i stated that you were attacking beck for being dishonest and i said that you were the one being dishonest because you are saying that you have lost faith in beck while you are frequenting a site called ‘stopbeck.com’. your responce was that i was a lier. and yet your profile clearly states that you blog on that site. i do thank you for placing m in the same catagory as beck, however i must decline. i am nothing like beck. he has the ambition to run multiple bussiness and still makes time for his family and his faith. compared to him most men are just plain lazy. as for his suport for romney because they share the same religion, well, he don’t. he suports santorim. as for your latest rant about beck destroying the only guy that can beat obama, if he is the only thing that can then we are realy in it now. what is the use of having a guy beat obama if that guy can’t run the nation right. thats like pullng a pilot out of the cockpit because he was aiming the plane at buildings and putting a gorrila in his place because he would fit in the seat. doesn’t mean that he can fly. respond to this if you like, but i will not be responding again to you.you evidently have a major problem with the truth, as you are calling people liars that simply point out that you have your own resons for attacking beck that has little to do with any truth.

A qoute from Barry Goldwater
in the book  The
Conscience of a Conservative (1960) that I feel goes to
the core of the conservative movement today….. 
I’m asking everyone to pass this on not only to your friends but to your
representatives in Washington, DC, your state,
your city etc. 

Quote:

“The turn will come when we entrust the conduct of
our affairs to men who understand that their first duty as public officials
is to divest themselves of the power they have been given. It will come when
Americans, in the hundreds of communities throughout the nation, decide to
put the man in office who is pledged to enforce the Constitution and restore
the Republic. Who will proclaim in a campaign speech: “I have little
interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I
mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose
to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them. It is not
to inaugurate new programs, but to cancel old ones that do violence to the
Constitution, or that have failed in their purpose, or that impose on the
people an unwarranted financial burden. I will not attempt to discover
whether legislation is ‘needed’ before I have first determined whether it is
constitutionally permissible. And if I should later be attacked for
neglecting my constituents’ ‘interests,’ I shall reply that I was informed
their main interest is liberty and that in that cause I am doing the very
best I can.”

Author:
Barry Goldwater     Topic: Constitution

Source:
‘The Conscience of a
Conservative;’ Victor Publishing Company, Shepherdsville, Ky., p. 17 (Chapter
2: Perils of Power)

 
Thanks to Rand Paul’s book The Tea Party Goes to
Washington for bringing this to light again!

Getting paid to tell Fanny and Fried STOP WHAT YOUR DOING, accept.  Believing the scientist about global warming and willing to promote saving this planet, accept.  As an historian thinking Wilson and Roosevelt were acting within the founding fathers understanding of this country, John Lock, Montesquieu, and Adam Smith.  I DO NOT ACCEPT.

Those were filled complaints.  NONE WHEN INVESTIGATED MOVED FORWARD.  KNOW YOUR FACTS.

Santorum in the Florida debate said the effect of the legislation Romney signed into law.  THAT IS HIS PROBLEM.

And Romney isn’t a Progressive or at least, a RINO? Remember Newt’s Contract With America, remember Newt’s entitlement reforms? Oh, yeah, and that hit-piece on Newt from RINO Abrams turns out to be a lie. Not only that, but Newt did not ‘resign in disgrace’ from Congress. He was exonerated. Glenn’s attacks on Newt are not as slimy as Romney’s, but they are less than truthful. You mean to tell me, Glenn, that Romney is more Conservative than Newt? Come on. Look what Newt accomplished for Reagan. That’s where I look. Mark Levin and Rush both agree that the latest hits on Gingrich are baseless. One thing for sure – the Obamacare you’re so afraid of? You’re going to get it if Romney’s your man. Glenn, you cut off your nose to spite your face. I don’t trust you anymore.

I really like Newt’s words and the ideas/ promises he’s making now.  He sounds almost like Paul-light.  But if Beck is right that he is a liar and a progressive, he won’t push the radically-conservative economic moves needed to pull the country out of the progressive economic train-wreck that Obama and 50 years of progressive political control have brought us.  He will simply reside over the 2012-1015 super-recession that is coming.  This will give “conservative” economics the blame for the financial, economic and monitor collapse that progressives will have caused.  This will solidify the stranglehold they have on our country.  If Obama is re-elected, the collapse may possibly be credited to the progressive ideas that created it… unless the media is able to hide the truth again.  It’s not a simple question with a simple answer, so let’s take our time and think about it.  My knee-jerk reaction is to trust that Newt has changed, but I’m a gullible person, frankly.  My principles (regarding debt/ taxes/ etc, not drugs and those things) tell me it’s Paul, but he is a weak public speaker.  Nothing I’ve seen so far favors Romney, but I keep looking for evidence that he’s not a big-gov progressive-light man without passion.  Obama has made his bed of failure, but do we really want a progressive with a conservative label to lye in it during the collapse of the next four years?    

Glenn you are wrong about Newt leaving in “Shame”…  CORRECTION PLEASE.  Newt still served as speaker for a couple of years then he left because he knew he would not be elected for another term….  Get your story correct.  I am sure there was shame but not the way you color your story!!!  The media says you were FIRED from Fox News should we believe them or you????  CORRECTION PLEASE… And if Newt and Romney are so much alike – why are you so worried about who we choose????