<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xml:base="http://www.glennbeck.com/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Barton responds to critics during interview with Glenn on GBTV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/08/16/david-barton-responds-to-critics-during-interview-with-glenn-on-gbtv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/08/16/david-barton-responds-to-critics-during-interview-with-glenn-on-gbtv/</link>
	<description>The Fusion of Entertainment and Enlightenment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Belfort</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/08/16/david-barton-responds-to-critics-during-interview-with-glenn-on-gbtv/#comment-153608</link>
		<dc:creator>David Belfort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=37046#comment-153608</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the good moral fight. Keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the good moral fight. Keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Belfort</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/08/16/david-barton-responds-to-critics-during-interview-with-glenn-on-gbtv/#comment-153607</link>
		<dc:creator>David Belfort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=37046#comment-153607</guid>
		<description>Can we get the transcript from this exchange.  Some people are video-challenged who can&#039;t bother to relate but will hold to their judgement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we get the transcript from this exchange.  Some people are video-challenged who can&#8217;t bother to relate but will hold to their judgement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jiujie798</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/08/16/david-barton-responds-to-critics-during-interview-with-glenn-on-gbtv/#comment-153233</link>
		<dc:creator>jiujie798</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 05:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=37046#comment-153233</guid>
		<description>tinyurl.com/cyk9xz2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tinyurl.com/cyk9xz2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krista Vessell</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/08/16/david-barton-responds-to-critics-during-interview-with-glenn-on-gbtv/#comment-152011</link>
		<dc:creator>Krista Vessell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=37046#comment-152011</guid>
		<description>So I suppose the 
Smithsonian&#039;s display of the actual book as a &quot;fake&quot; fabricated the 
&quot;liberal extremists&quot;?  I&#039;m sorry, but basing an assumption that Jefferson did include miracles in
 one of his editions of his &quot;Jefferson Bible&quot; (even though David himself
 isn&#039;t sharing any actual images of such miracles existing in a 
&quot;Jefferson Bible) on the passages that were REMOVED from an English 1804
 Bible is absolutely NOT a sound reasoning to 
base an assumption on.  Oh, and the 
Bibles were printed on BOTH sides of a page.  So if Jefferson cut 
something out from the front of a page, he automatically rendered the 
reverse section of that same page unusable, even if he wanted to include
 something from that same area of the reverse side of the page.  Because
 of that, Jefferson actually needed 2 of each Bible so that when he cut a
 passage out from the front of a page, he would still have access to 
uncut verses on the reverse of that same page.  I suppose Barton knows 
which Bibles were used for cuttings from either the front or back of the
 same page too, right?  The only proof of what Jefferson intended to 
include in &quot;the Jefferson Bible&quot; is to look at what was actually 
included in the book itself; anything beyond that is unfounded 
speculation, pure and simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I suppose the<br />
Smithsonian&#8217;s display of the actual book as a &#8220;fake&#8221; fabricated the<br />
&#8220;liberal extremists&#8221;?  I&#8217;m sorry, but basing an assumption that Jefferson did include miracles in<br />
 one of his editions of his &#8220;Jefferson Bible&#8221; (even though David himself<br />
 isn&#8217;t sharing any actual images of such miracles existing in a<br />
&#8220;Jefferson Bible) on the passages that were REMOVED from an English 1804<br />
 Bible is absolutely NOT a sound reasoning to<br />
base an assumption on.  Oh, and the<br />
Bibles were printed on BOTH sides of a page.  So if Jefferson cut<br />
something out from the front of a page, he automatically rendered the<br />
reverse section of that same page unusable, even if he wanted to include<br />
 something from that same area of the reverse side of the page.  Because<br />
 of that, Jefferson actually needed 2 of each Bible so that when he cut a<br />
 passage out from the front of a page, he would still have access to<br />
uncut verses on the reverse of that same page.  I suppose Barton knows<br />
which Bibles were used for cuttings from either the front or back of the<br />
 same page too, right?  The only proof of what Jefferson intended to<br />
include in &#8220;the Jefferson Bible&#8221; is to look at what was actually<br />
included in the book itself; anything beyond that is unfounded<br />
speculation, pure and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slapweasel</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/08/16/david-barton-responds-to-critics-during-interview-with-glenn-on-gbtv/#comment-151980</link>
		<dc:creator>Slapweasel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=37046#comment-151980</guid>
		<description> &quot;Academia&quot; is a cloistered bubble of self-proclaimed, self-congratulatory myopia.  If 99% of them couldn&#039;t re-route the electrical connections in my house, I could claim that you shouldn&#039;t listen to THEM.

I&#039;ll consider everything I can read and hear before coming to my OWN conclusion.

&quot;Academia&quot; be damned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8221;Academia&#8221; is a cloistered bubble of self-proclaimed, self-congratulatory myopia.  If 99% of them couldn&#8217;t re-route the electrical connections in my house, I could claim that you shouldn&#8217;t listen to THEM.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll consider everything I can read and hear before coming to my OWN conclusion.</p>
<p>&#8220;Academia&#8221; be damned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krista Vessell</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/08/16/david-barton-responds-to-critics-during-interview-with-glenn-on-gbtv/#comment-151945</link>
		<dc:creator>Krista Vessell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=37046#comment-151945</guid>
		<description>Funny...David completely ignored me when I called Wallbuilders asking why he compared the Barbary Corsairs to &quot;modern-day Muslim extremists.&quot;  Was told someone would get back to me, gave my email address and phone number, and NO ONE contacted me for OVER A YEAR.  Finally asked the same question on his Facebook page and was COMPLETELY IGNORED while people who posts praises of Barton and requests for appearances by him were answered immediately.  I&#039;ve never been so disrespected by people as I have been by Barton fans, and his own &quot;Wallbuilders&quot; society.  Glenn, I don&#039;t know who these &quot;many many people&quot; you&#039;ve seen David talk to are, but I&#039;m fairly certain they weren&#039;t people who disagreed with him! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny&#8230;David completely ignored me when I called Wallbuilders asking why he compared the Barbary Corsairs to &#8220;modern-day Muslim extremists.&#8221;  Was told someone would get back to me, gave my email address and phone number, and NO ONE contacted me for OVER A YEAR.  Finally asked the same question on his Facebook page and was COMPLETELY IGNORED while people who posts praises of Barton and requests for appearances by him were answered immediately.  I&#8217;ve never been so disrespected by people as I have been by Barton fans, and his own &#8220;Wallbuilders&#8221; society.  Glenn, I don&#8217;t know who these &#8220;many many people&#8221; you&#8217;ve seen David talk to are, but I&#8217;m fairly certain they weren&#8217;t people who disagreed with him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/08/16/david-barton-responds-to-critics-during-interview-with-glenn-on-gbtv/#comment-151746</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 02:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=37046#comment-151746</guid>
		<description>thank you, glen for your interview with david barton.  it was so informative and revealed the man you described david to be.  thank you for your boldness and courage...both of you!  it is such a shame when there is so much evil going on in this country, we Christians can&#039;t seem to work together and get along...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you, glen for your interview with david barton.  it was so informative and revealed the man you described david to be.  thank you for your boldness and courage&#8230;both of you!  it is such a shame when there is so much evil going on in this country, we Christians can&#8217;t seem to work together and get along&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickDeringer</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/08/16/david-barton-responds-to-critics-during-interview-with-glenn-on-gbtv/#comment-151728</link>
		<dc:creator>NickDeringer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=37046#comment-151728</guid>
		<description>I still feel deeply betrayed by David Barton. I&#039;m sill waiting for the list of conservative &quot;scholars&quot; who back Baton&#039;s interpretation of the facts. Apparently all conservatives scholars are in on the Left-wing conspiracy against David Barton.  

Glenn has let his feelings trump the truth in this situation. 

GBTV: &quot;The truth has no agenda except when our close friends are involved.&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still feel deeply betrayed by David Barton. I&#8217;m sill waiting for the list of conservative &#8220;scholars&#8221; who back Baton&#8217;s interpretation of the facts. Apparently all conservatives scholars are in on the Left-wing conspiracy against David Barton.  </p>
<p>Glenn has let his feelings trump the truth in this situation. </p>
<p>GBTV: &#8220;The truth has no agenda except when our close friends are involved.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordon McKee</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/08/16/david-barton-responds-to-critics-during-interview-with-glenn-on-gbtv/#comment-151644</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordon McKee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=37046#comment-151644</guid>
		<description>Nick, you&#039;re making the same mistake as the scholars refuting Barton.  You&#039;re quoting from a book that took quotes from Jefferson and arranged them as they wanted them to look.  Go back to the original letters that Jefferson wrote.  He never said what you just quoted, at least not in the single context that you just gave it.  That&#039;s the whole point that Barton is trying to make.  Most scholars go back to a single scholar from the 60s who studied Jefferson but they never go back to the original works of Jefferson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, you&#8217;re making the same mistake as the scholars refuting Barton.  You&#8217;re quoting from a book that took quotes from Jefferson and arranged them as they wanted them to look.  Go back to the original letters that Jefferson wrote.  He never said what you just quoted, at least not in the single context that you just gave it.  That&#8217;s the whole point that Barton is trying to make.  Most scholars go back to a single scholar from the 60s who studied Jefferson but they never go back to the original works of Jefferson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jalina Susan Stutte</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/08/16/david-barton-responds-to-critics-during-interview-with-glenn-on-gbtv/#comment-151124</link>
		<dc:creator>Jalina Susan Stutte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=37046#comment-151124</guid>
		<description>Davd Barton is a great Christian man an I will not be buy in anything with Thomas Nelson Publishers from this day on. I will also contact them and encourage all to stand up to this evil,that threatens this good man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Davd Barton is a great Christian man an I will not be buy in anything with Thomas Nelson Publishers from this day on. I will also contact them and encourage all to stand up to this evil,that threatens this good man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
