I wish he was running for president.
Back on topic, Rand Paul makes sense, and I’ve just seen him speak. I like him, and hope he can continue with his programs. http://WinforGoDaddy.webs.com
I wish he would get a bill passed
Okay, I’m going to go a bit off-topic and hopefully forestall some of the usual Ron Paul / Gary Johnson comments. Let me say about them — if you don’t like Romney/Ryan, and are going to write in Ron Paul or Gary Johnson, Aren’t you dividing your vote between them, thus lessening your effectiveness? The illogic of such statements amazes me. Might as well just get together and vote for Obama, as that will be the result of such actions. I’ve seen Ron Paul’s picture, but I’ve never seen Gary Johnson — who is he? What does he say? If you say you are going to vote for one or the other of them, does that convince me to vote with you? How many of you are there? Enough to sway the vote? There needs to be a national movement that people can see and know about, to get on board with, THEN put forward one or the other of those two guys for us to vote for. Otherwise, your efforts are for naught.
Back on topic, Rand Paul makes sense, and I’ve just seen him speak. I like him, and hope he can continue with his programs.
No, they work on the same principles as the libertarians and get nothing done. Consensus is not in their vocabulary, i wonder why they are even invited to the GOP debates… why even give them any face time ..
First, Libertarians, in the beginning, were creating a separate party. Republicans realized they would not win elections if the Libertarians did that. The Republicans courted the Libertarians, not the other way around. By the way, you do realize that Pat and Glenn are registered Libertarians, right?
Well then they should do fine with their own debates and advertising their own party…. maybe Ron Paul could pass some more bills. What’s the total count upto now?…. I’ll give you a hint, out of his first 620 bills only 1 passed…(in 2009 he sold an abandoned building in texas) that’s a walking Tour de Force !!
So, you think that he has done NOTHING? Where do you think the idea about auditing the Federal Reserve came from? Believe me, I would rather Libertarians NOT be a part of the GOP. You would actually get to see how many of us there are and see how many Republicans would come over, along with Democraps and Independents. That’s OK though, keep thinking we are insignificant to your own peril.
I would rather Libertarians NOT be a part of the GOP… also..
I can see why, freedom for all is not in the Republican ideas. Republicans want to control people, just like Democraps, just about different things. As I stated before, Republicans can NOT win any elections without the Libertarian vote. It’s good that the leaders of the Republicans party realize that, because people like you sure don’t.
P.S. I find it funny that you say this on a site that is owned by a Libertarian. That’s right, Glenn is a Libertarian. So are Pat and the new guy Andrew Wilkow.
I would rather lose to Obama than adopt the Libertarians into our party, a group who cannot understand the word consensus…. Vote Libertarian we won’t forget….. see how many bills you pass then with your good friends the DEMS…
The consensus is Mitt Romney…. is there some part of that sentence you don’t understand ?
The consensus is Mitt Romney? So, in other words, you feel that whomever the Republicans put up, that is who everyone must vote for? The Democraps put up a clown like Obamao, so they should simply sit down, s t f u and vote Obamao? Sorry, but you may believe the B S coming out of both parties, but I do not. Romney and Obamao are no choice.
I will vote Libertarian. What will you not forget? Is that a threat? Sorry, but internet tough guys do not scare me, in fact, I have no fear.
I’m impressed… have you any other mendacious facts about your party you would like to add ?
Since you have no facts about Libertarians, I guess you should learn something before spouting this B S.
So i guess, I’ll accept your concession !!
That must be your way of saying you have nothing…
There are dictionaries online… since apparently you don’t understand english, try using one.. you might not sound so pathetic !!
You really should look up “psychological projection,” then look in a mirror…
Don’t have to look it up, i understand english. I’m impressed you learned a new word though….. bravo… suprising since education is obviously not one of your priorities.
Yeah, anyone who disagrees with you must lack an education. You are a fool.
and you are a pernicious pest..
A vulgar pernicious pest.
Hey brother talking to Mag
What are you crying about?
haven’t you noticed you are on the wrong field… in the game of wits you are like beating on a mere child…
WOW! You have the nerve to call someone else uneducated and can not even quote the saying properly? You are one dumb mother fucker, it’s “having a battle of wits with someone who is unarmed.” The unarmed person is you, dunce.
to your P.S. i find that funny… what are you saying they’ll sensor me from debating (You sound more like you should be in the CSA) …. they didn’t understand the term consensus either. How was the constitution written …. ahhhh…… maybe a consensus ?
I did not say anyone would CENSOR you. I find it funny and ironic that you post this drivel about Libertarians on a Libertarian site. You agree with Glenn and the people on the Blaze, yet act as if Libertarianism is so outlandish. You do realize that you are agreeing with a lot of Libertarian views, right?
The owner of this Libertarian site will vote for Mitt Romney this November.
How do you know that? He said that, but how do you know, for a fact?
He said so.
That is his choice, but how do you know for sure?
I listen to him when he speaks.
The poor guy doesn’t even believe his own parties platform articles..
But a puerile version of it…. LOL… wow.. maybe he takes the OK on smoking drugs article to seriously.
He’s (Glenn Beck) smart enough to know that 4 more years of Obama will be disastrous for the country and he’s putting the country first like every American should.
He knows that a Ross Perot type split in the election that gave Clinton the Presidency will hand Obama the election. He’s all about learning from history.
are you talking about greywolfrs ? You stated exactly the point i have been trying to make…. this works thru consensus..
Kinda. He thinks GB should vote Libertarian on principle and not on the reality of the situation.
exactly, not the brightest star in the sky… GB just put up a new page – about mitt….
Grey can believe what he wants but it’s not good for the country right now. His party isn’t strong enough to defeat Obama and the Democrats and that’s the foremost concern at this moment. He should try and develop a stronger party for the future but 2 months from one of the most important elections this country has faced in half a century is not the time for grandstanding.
true there brother,, hope it doesn’t get out of hand.. may just have to pull the boots out of the closet… LOL
Libertarians are what they are. I agree with some of what they believe but a last minute thrust that will get Obama re-elected is not going to help the country.
Yeah they want it all.. but have considered getting nothing… they just don’t understand the word consensus… can you imagine the debate during the writing of the constitution… i agree with some of what they say too, but right now that is irrelevant, we need to take the WH..
Have you ever thought it isn’t grandstanding? Maybe some of us are tired of the B S coming out of both parties? Maybe some of are tired of voting for the “lesser of two evils?” Maybe some of are tired of the fake left/right paradigm? Sorry, but I do not see Romney being so much better than Obamao, it is what it is.
Have you ever thought of putting the country first and then building a strong viable party that could get elected in an actual election? Ross Perot worked on his platform for years and even managed to get 18% of the vote but in reality all it did was put a Liberal Democrat in the White House for 8 years. 18% is outstanding as far as history goes for third parties in this country but the organization wasn’t able to get a majority and Democrats will never see what you see in Libertarianism, they are Marxists!
I really don’t care how you see Mitt Romney but I can clearly see Obama and what he’s done. I don’t think the country can stand another 4 years with Liberal Progressives in power.
I don’t know if i’d call them marxists, maybe anti-fedrealist.
First, you obviously do not have the first clue what a Marxist is, I would suggest that you learn what it is before continuing to spout that drivel. Second, just because most Americans have been so dumbed-down and can not see the truth when it is put right in front of their face, does not mean I will be party to that. I find it funny that you mention Perot, he was right about almost everything he said. Instead of voting for the guy who would have done right by this country, people like you voted for Dole. I can clearly see that it is the Republicans fault that Obamao is president. They put up a clown like McCain and he put chooses Palin as his running mate, are fucking kidding me? They lose the election on purpose and now I am supposed to fall lock-step with Republicans to get rid of Obamao? Not a fucking chance. Sorry, I will not be manipulated, by them or you.
Don’t go and try and put your “first clue” nonsense on me grey. Now who’s been spewing drivel? I’ve treated you with respect here and your post is insulting.
You think you can force your truth on to others grey?
Thanks for your ignorant vulgar post and you have once again exposed what kind of person you truly are.
Like I said, I don’t really care who you vote for.
This conversation is over now that you have turned into just another vulgar poster on the Net.
See ya, Have a nice day.
See ya, and feel free to stop following me.
I do what I like, it’s called freedom, you know what freedom is grey, right?
Yeah, the problem here is you not understanding freedom, not I.
I spent a lifetime defending this country and swore to protect and defend the Constitution.
Don’t give me your nonsense grey, I’m way ahead of you when it comes to freedom to the point of sacrificing mine to protect yours.
Please don’t bother me with your rhetoric grey. Go try and get some others to join your cause using your vulgarity.
Why are you still talking? I guess “see ya” must mean something different to you. You spent a life time defending my freedom? Guess what, I will defend my own freedom, so stop your nonsense. Keep crying about vulgarity, that is beyond FUCKING stupid. You call sticky chin an idiot, then turn around and say this to me? Pot meet kettle.
And you keep posting garbage to me. Another vulgar comment from a vulgar little man. This has nothing to do with strtlk, this is all about you and me. I tried to post to you with respect and you turn vulgar.
I guess you don’t understand it when people tell you that their not interested in your nonsense. Please, take it somewhere else.
As far as defending this country and taking the oath to defend the Constitution is concerned, you should try it or if you swore the oath in the past then live by it. In any case, as I’ve said in the past, I don’t really care what you do.
Again, you a laughable. You think defending only parts of freedom is fulfilling your oath? Nice try, but it doesn’t work that way. Maybe you should try rereading that oath, then stop trying to take freedom from people who disagree with you.
By the way, I do not really give a shit what you consider vulgar or not. Can;t take a bad word? Grow up.
Are you back again? Vulgarity is a sign of a weak mind. You use it all you want.
Take your nonsense somewhere else, I’m not interested.
What are you crying about? Apparently you are, you keep replying with your complete fucking stupidity.
BY the way, it is very clear that you have nothing for what I actually said, imagine that.
Sorry, I’m not interested little man.
I can see you are not interested, as you keep replying. Stupid shit.
And again and again and again…
Until you realize that I will not be silenced by you or anyone. Until you realize that you will NOT have the last word.
Again and again and again…
I don’t want to silence you pal, I just don’t care for your nonsense.
So it’s a last word thing for you? Nice. Why don’t you use one of your vulgar weak minded ones?
That all you got? Talk about weak-minded fucking morons, there you are. By the way, it seems you have the issue with the last word.
P.S. I am not your pal, friend or neighbor, you would do well to remember that.
Nice vulgar small minded post Pal.
No, we are not. Nice try, but that dog don’t hunt. Are you still crying about a word? What are you like 10 years old? Grow up, dumb M F er.
Yes we are. Imagine that!
No, we are not, we may live near each other, but we are NOT neighbors. Noce try, dumb shit.
Yes we are. Imagine that.
You really don’t see a difference, do you? Man, you really are one dumb mother fucker.
I see you almost every day neighbor.
Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha
Really? And how is it you know where I live or even who I am? I doubt you do…
Keep thining you know me, you really don’t.
You know what the funny part is, even if you did see me everyday, you think that makes us neighbors, it doesn’t.
You talk about yourself too much and you’re all over the internet. You do know that you always leave a trail when you’re on the internet, right?
I’ll wave to you tomorrow if I see you.
Why not come up and introduce yourself? Too big of a coward?
I don’t fraternize with morons but thanks anyway.
Many people have and I have said the same thing to them all. As I stated, you are a coward, nothing more.
So you say but I still don’t fraternize with morons, neighbor.
Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha
What a vulgar little man you are. I’ll give you a wave tomorrow little man.
Where do these guys get these ideas? Their more out of their mind than Ron Paul because even Paul knows you need some rules in order to have a functioning country.
They are what they are Rahm.
They make some good points but then they go to crazy land and we get this idiotic saber rattling. I guess I hate freedom because I believe people should take responsibility for their own stupidity.
This is why Ron Paul couldn’t get any traction in the run up to this election. People don’t want a fanatic in the White House. When people follow blindly you get a president like Obama and we all know what a disaster he has been.
Some people yell about freedom when they will be the ones responsible for four more years of Liberal Progressive rule in this country. Cutting off their own noses to save face.
It is part of being a civilized society.
I don’t think this country could handle a no rule society at least my generation. Just look at the music they listen to yah let’s take rules away so they can do whatever they feel like.
That is sad but true.. Ron Paul is not exactly the brightest star either.
Ron Paul is like brown star but his followers are as dense as a neutron star.
Actually, I think he should vote how he sees fit, as will I, as should everyone. The reality is the Republicans put up a clown like McCain and got this idiot elected in the first place and now I am supposed to jump on board and vote the way they want? I don’t think so.
McCain was not a good choice.. think he’s always been a RINO..
I held my nose and voted for McCain but he wasn’t my first choice. I was correct in what I knew about Obama, I read his book and could see that he was a Marxist. His father was a Marxist, his mother was a Marxist, his mentors were all Marxists.
Jump or don’t jump, I don’t care. Futility is not an option for me, I’m a realist who’s lived through 11 presidents. There’s nothing new here except that the survival of the country we both love so much is at stake. I think Mitt Romney will do wonders if people actually get behind him and if he doesn’t, then you have 4 years to build a stronger party to challenge the next Liberal Progressive they throw against us.
Do what you think is best, I don’t really care.
Yeah, because Romney will be so much better. And you have the nerve to call anyone else fool? Wake up and smell what you are shoveling.
Did I call you a “fool”? Interesting how you read posts.
Who’s the one shoveling what?
Actually, that was reply to Moronsteve, my bad, apologies.
So know you’ve lowered yourself to being a aeolist, and your only debating skills is this infantile and inept name calling..
That all you got? You are a fool.
quit demonstrating your panache… it’s laughable..
You are laughable.
Go back to your troglodyte life…
That all you got? Stupid little kid.
Or maybe I simply do not agree with everything they say. Nevermind that though, that doesn’t fit into your stupidity.
That is straight from the Libertarian Party Platform website (As adopted in Convention, May 2012, Las Vegas, Nevada).. So i guess you haven’t read it, or just lack punctilious study, or you just spread bombastic codswallop !!
Wrong, the Libertarian candidate is Gary Johnson, nice try.
Have you enrolled in a remedial reading program yet… that is the Libertarian Party Platform… and their articles…
So, where in that is the concensus to vote for Romney?
I don’t think all Libertarians will run from Romney when Obama is the alternative.
To say “all” would deny human nature, but let’s be realistic, Republicans and Democraps have been slandering Libertarians almost since their inception. One can not think that that will bode well for them. At some point, Libertarians, in general, will get tired of it.
First, people like you always say a vote for a third party is a vote for Obamao. That is a lie, a vote is for the person it is cast for, no one else. Second, Republicans keep putting up clowns like Romney, Democraps keep putting up clowns like Obamao and the rest of us are supposed to choose between the “lesser of two evils.” Have you thought that some people are tired of doing that? Have you ever thought that some people are tired of getting screwed by the Democraps and Republicans? Third, how is there ever supposed to be a real discussion about Libertarians, when both sides of the media are more focused on knocking them down? Yes, both sides hate Libertarians. Why? Probably because Libertarians believe in our founding documents as they were written, no need to interpret them. Democraps and Republicans want control over the people, one side has their issues and the other has theirs. Libertarians don’t want to control anyone, hence why both sides hate us.
Who is the third party vote? I don’t know about you but I wish we heard more from third party runners just to see where they stand so we could make the most informed decision. I want them to be in the debates.
At this point, it would be Gary Johnson. The media will never give him air time, just like Ron Paul. By the way, I will not vote for Gary Johnson for one reason, he is FOR open borders. That alone sealed it for me. I guess I will have to go with the tried and true Ron Paul vote.
Third party was in the debates.. didn’t you watch them ? Ron Paul and Gary Johnson are Libertarians. well we can look at the Libertarian Party platform here are some exerpts:
1.2 Personal Privacy
We favor the repeal of all laws creating “crimes” without victims, such as the use of drugs for medicinal or recreational purposes. (So i guess you can use and sell drugs)
1.3 Personal Relationships
Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships. (Guess they stand with gay rights with the DEMS)
Government should be kept out of the matter of Abortion. (Again they stand with the DEMS)
We oppose all laws at any level of government requiring registration of, or restricting, the ownership, manufacture, or transfer or sale of firearms or ammunition. (Sounds like Felons can have guns)
2.1 Property and Contract
We oppose all controls on wages, prices, rents, profits, production, and interest rates. (So i guess you can be charged any interest rate a loan company can get, and no minimum Wage, Monopolized markets like the electric company can charge what ever they want)
If you would like to read more http://www.lp.org/platform
Hay those are the very reasons I can vote for them I just wish we had a better pick than Mitt but will still vote for the guy at least he is no Obama and never ate dog. Not all Libertarians are bad there are just some weird ideas a few of them have. I lean more libertarian than most I don’t support gay marriage but I do support the right for churches to choose what they want to do with the issue. Let’s face it government has no right to tell churches what to do because laws like the gay marriage band might come up and bit us faithful in the rear in the long run because once we start telling Churches you can’t do this or that then government will feel they could bully us into believing whatever the hell the want us to believe. As for the other stuff like Personal Privacy, Abortion, and Property and Contract their views are downright moronic.
I would call them interesting at least…. LOL…. check GB’s new post on Mitt.. i agree i was originally supporting any of the Tea Party canidates, however now it’s down to Obama or Mitt…. I find that a very easy decision to make, and if Mitt won the GOP I will do whatever i can to help get Obama out of office..
Bring a pry bar.
Moronic? So, freedom is moronic now? You think you or the government has the right to tell people how to live? You think you or the government has the right to tell women that can not have abortions? You do realize that things like minimum wage have done nothing but increase inflation, right?
Look put too much rules on the economy kills it but no rules at all kills the economy as well. I believe children have a right to live. Where is their freedom to choose life for the unborn Gray? The founders would be sick of us for even allowing that to happen. What use is freedom when it cost someone else’s right to be born?
Well, too much rules or no rules, no rules means those things work themselves out. It would foolish to think that they wouldn’t. You think after paying 10’s of thousands of dollars for an education that a person would take 5.00 per hour? That doesn’t make sense.
Since the SCOTUS has ruled, abortion is a non-issue. It’s not for you or I to say what someone else does. We do have the right to NOT participate. Isn’t freedom wonderful?
So, we should just get rid of freedom if it doesn;t suit us? We should control what others do, if we do not like it? That isn’t freedom. Besides, my point is simple, once they take one thing that leads to another and then we are in the mess we are in today.
So I guess the founders of the constitution hated freedom to because they tried the whole no anarchy thing and almost ripped this country to pieces so the put laws down. Sorry no matter what you say anarchy does not work ever and never will. That is why no one goes for it to long. Please do yourself a favor put down the Ron Paul kook aid and think with that brain I know you have.
Where exactly is anyone talking about anarchy? That’s funny, I have not seen that anywhere, but if you think limiting freedom means anarchy, I would say you need to put down the crack pipe. No where in the Constitution does it say that you, I or the government has the right to make laws that limit someone’s freedom. Thanks for the laugh though, Ron Paul kook-aid. As i stated before, it’s things like this that push people like me further away from Republicans.
Now you know how I feel when you say I hate freedom because I want people to take responsibility for their own stupidity. Show me where in the constitution does it says we have the freedom to kill others so we don’t have to take reasonability for our own stupidity? Sorry but when one freedom takes freedom from others it is not freedom no matter how much you try to twist abortion it not a freedom it is mass murder. Sorry but that sounds like a left wing stupidity. Here is an idea if you think there should be some rules let’s hear those rules that you change. I will start to give you an idea. I know plenty about the milk industry. It should not be messed with outside of the farm or should be allowed to be unmolested but they don’t sterilize it at the farm wrong. Why because they pasteurize it there before it even get ship and believe me it taste better and makes for a better drink but they can’t do that because the government want it healthier and that means watered down milk with half of its nutrients gone people our shock that the milk they get does not taste like real milk. Tell me if you don’t believe in anarchy then what will you keep and throw away?
Taking responsibility has nothing to do with making laws that tell people what they can and can not do. No one is saying anyone has the right to infringe upon another’s freedom, but conversely neither do you.
Take drugs, for instance, if someone chooses to do them, that is their choice. The moment they drive, they have done something that effects others, just like alcohol. It’s exactly the same, that is the point.
As I stated before, no one said anything about anarchy. Making things illegal to “protect someone from themselves” is wrong, period. That is what I and Libertarians are talking about. Making laws that say someone can not have more than a 16 oz. coke, is wrong. Making a law that requires someone to buy something is not freedom. Saying someone must follow a particular religious belief and any morality that comes with it, is not freedom. None of that can be considered freedom, no matter how anyone slices it.
I hear what you are saying about the milk. My grandfather was a farmer and I had milk straight from the cow with nothing done to it. One could say that the milk we buy today is not “real,” but here is the kicker, if one farmer does “water it down,” and another doesn’t, who do you think will sell more? The free-market would have just corrected itself. Not everything needs to be regulated. A lot of times the free-market will right itself, without government getting involved. Besides, you should already know that the government is a cluster-fuck and could fuck-up a wet dream. Why would anyone want them to regulate anymore than they should? Another thing, regulation is a means of control.
You know, some things are not as cut and dry as others make them…
I don’t even want to talk about drugs. A friend of mine overdosed on drugs at my home. I just walked outside and he overdosed to try to kill himself so let’s not go down that road you going to see a side of me that you will really hate.
Really? And you are the only one that has ever dealt with anything like that? My sister committed suicide, because of drugs, in 2008, she hung herself. My cousin spent 24 years in jail because of it, but you have some great insight that no one else does? How many people have you known that are dead because of alcohol? Yet, I do not see you advocating outlawing that…
I am sorry you went through that my heart breaks for you it truly does. It must be hard on you and cannot even imagine the pain you go through. I and my sister are good friends with each other and I don’t even want to think what mess I would be in if she killed herself.
I appreciate the sentiment, but the point was simple. I know the dangers of drugs, first hand, from several different angles. In the end, the government making laws to try to stop it did nothing. Those drugs are still here and people are still doing them. My sister held a job and still did them. So, why should we continue to spend BILLIONS on a failed drug war? We are making the cartels rich, just like the mob during prohibition on alcohol. We never learned anything from the prohibition on alcohol. In the end, it is simply a way for the government to to take away personal freedom. Once they take some, they take a little more and a little more until freedom is gone.
Obviously, I do not like drugs, but it does go far beyond that…
Maybe but what would our country look like?
Well, if one looks at the country now or upon ending prohibition of alcohol, it seems pretty clear. If drugs were manufactured here, distributed here and sold here, it would probably look like the manufacture, distribution and sales of alcohol. The government could stop spending tons of money, at all levels, enforcing laws to take away free choice. They would only lock up people who do things like drive under the influence. No DEA, no local law enforcement, no sending troops to combat drug cartels in other countries and no more letting those same cartels make TONS of money. Hell, the Feds could even charge a tax on it.
By the way, you do realize that prohibition has not always been in place. It did not seem to harm the country from growing or becoming a world power. That is just one example, look at Bloomberg outlawing sodas over 16 oz. We know what the country looks like before, what is that going to change? All in all, this is a microcosm of what the government, at all levels, are doing to us. Regulating us into their control is not freedom.
You have a point. As long as none come from other countries it might even stop the bloodshed over the broader.
Well, I would tell you this, before saying something is out-there or telling to stop drinking the Ron Paul kook-aid, maybe try to understand the point being made. Maybe understand that there may be a good reason why someone would say what they say. You and I have spoken on many occasions and we not have always agreed, but I think we have made our points to each other.
I apologize yes I did take it a too far.
I apologize as well, sometimes my blood gets boiling and I go too far.
Happens when people talk about politics.
That’s true. It also happens when people make erroneous comments. Instead of actually listening to what the tenets are, they go and make assumptions….
I was thinking of just walking away again until these elections are over with. We might not agree with each other in general but this in fighting is driving me nuts. I will be honest I rather have Ron Paul running instead of Mitt yes I don’t like his half of his policies but at least he was noble in wanting to stop war and you could never question his love for this country and that he would of done something. I don’t buy that just because he does not want to fight for Israel that he is anti-Semitic he just does not want crap like what is happening now in the Middle East. Can hardly blame him. It is a scary time for a young guy like me I wonder if we even have a future to be had in this country anymore. A future with no freedom at all is one I want no part of.
Well, freedom is not free, far from it. Sometimes one has to fight to preserve the things we hold dear…
Freedom is difficult to maintain, it’s somewhat instinctual to desire a certain level of security. Since we are losing our family structure we’re looking elsewhere. That’s why we are unknowingly falling for this socialistic trap. But it’s inevitable, once freedom is truly gone, even those bleeding heart liberals will know the difference. I still hope we can avoid that trap.
Oops I meant can’t vote for them.
1.2 It’s not for you or the government to say what people can and can not do, that’s called freedom.
1.3 Gay rights have nothing to do with anything, it’s about freedom and again you nor the government have the right to take it away, simply becaus you disagree.
1.4 Since Roe v. Wade, the government should have nothing to do with a person’s right to choose. Some people have the right to choose that option and others have the right not to participate. Isn’t freedom wonderful?
1.6 Actually, this is more addressing the firearm bans that the government feels they have the right to enforce.
2.1 Monoplolized markets? The only reason we are in the mess we are in is because of too much government. The markets and wages would level out on their own, without government. Besides, you mention minimum wage and fail to realize that everytime the government increases it, they increase inflation.
By the way, you really are sounding like a left wing idiot. You want control over people in the manner in which YOU see fit, but if anyone else tries to do something you disagree with, you can’t have that.
~ Rand Paul/Ron Paul = Two pinko commies who don’t like killing muslims.
~ I can’t believe Glenn “Kill-them-over-there” Beck even had Rand Paul on.
~ Semper Fi!
They are nothing of the sort. On another note, keep spouting this stuff and showing your ignorance. And you wonder why Libertarians hate the Republicans. By the way, you do realize that NO Republican can win without the Libertarian vote, right? I didn’t think so.
Don’t you know, no Libertarians can win period !!
Really? I can see that you fail to realize that the Tea Party ideas are Libertarian ideas. I see that you fail to realize that the brand was renamed for people just like you. Look up the ideas the Tea Party are spouting, then look up the tenets of Libertarianism, shockingly they are exactly the same.
It was cute on how glenn beck side stepped the fact that RP got his ass kicked last weekend. He did his best to use idiotic tea party lingo to lie, twist and attack but found out that his lies could not stand up to facts.
Strtlk is what the Democrat party and the Liberals look like. Many of them are in power in our government.
Save America, vote Conservative.
It’s OK to vote Obama out of office, really it is. It’s Ok to remove a leader who is noneffective.
On Obama, You really should weigh the Pros and Cons:
Speaks two languages (Ebonics, English) depending on crowd, Can never be broke while their is checks left in his checkbook.
Don’t know where he came from.. don’t know where he’s going, Never ran a company or lemonade stand, Says he hates “trickle down economics” and is asking for 3rd trickle down Stimulus package…….Can’t understand that 6 Trillion dollars in more debt is not a good thing. Thinks he is royalty and the US is his Empire. Wants to fulfill his life long dream of being a Venture Capitalist with our money….
Save America, vote Conservative.
Hey, it’s sticky chin the coward. Again, our stupidity shines through. Ron Paul is about the only honest politician we have, I guess that is why a moron like you hate him. Honesty is your mortal enemy.
Well, I like Rand, but I would give him this advice. Stop trying to get bills passed, just relax and wait. You aren’t going to get anything by the Senate. Hairy Balls will not even bring it to a vote. Do what you were elected to do, STOP THE DEMOCRAPS FROM PULLING THEIR SHIT. After the next election, then try to get some of this stuff through, when you will have more support.
I have a hero. It’s a man who doesn’t just talk a big talk, but backs it up with action. From declaring life begins at conception, to auditing the Fed, to the best health care plan yet, to not giving aid to Pakistan until the free the doctor who led us to bin Laden and they have imprisoned, are constantly pushing back his trail date and are threatening to kill, this man stands for what is right. I really admire Rand Paul for doing this
I might be able to take GB a little more seriously if he didnt always post all these pics of himself, looking like a dumbass. Tell me: why does he always have to have a goofy ass look on his face? Is it supposed to be disarming or something?
Have you looked in the mirror lately?