<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xml:base="http://www.glennbeck.com/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The section of Mitt Romney&#8217;s &#8220;gaffe&#8221; tape you haven&#8217;t heard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/20/the-section-of-mitt-romneys-gaffe-tape-you-havent-heard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/20/the-section-of-mitt-romneys-gaffe-tape-you-havent-heard/</link>
	<description>The Fusion of Entertainment and Enlightenment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 10:24:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesustheonlyway</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/20/the-section-of-mitt-romneys-gaffe-tape-you-havent-heard/#comment-169545</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesustheonlyway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 01:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38265#comment-169545</guid>
		<description>I hope Romney isn&#039;t the mealy mouth McCain was and doesn&#039;t bring out these hard facts and Obama&#039;s flaws.  If he is - we lose!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Romney isn&#8217;t the mealy mouth McCain was and doesn&#8217;t bring out these hard facts and Obama&#8217;s flaws.  If he is &#8211; we lose!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/20/the-section-of-mitt-romneys-gaffe-tape-you-havent-heard/#comment-168543</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38265#comment-168543</guid>
		<description>LOL  He was talking about the government, dunce.  He was talking about how without government NO business is possible.  Try again, libtard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL  He was talking about the government, dunce.  He was talking about how without government NO business is possible.  Try again, libtard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelly Ruggiero Casaretti</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/20/the-section-of-mitt-romneys-gaffe-tape-you-havent-heard/#comment-167877</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelly Ruggiero Casaretti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38265#comment-167877</guid>
		<description>Funny thing is, I feel the same way Glenn.  I too, no longer feel worried. I don&#039;t believe ANY of the polls &amp; I feel Obamao is out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny thing is, I feel the same way Glenn.  I too, no longer feel worried. I don&#8217;t believe ANY of the polls &amp; I feel Obamao is out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Woehrle</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/20/the-section-of-mitt-romneys-gaffe-tape-you-havent-heard/#comment-167773</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Woehrle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38265#comment-167773</guid>
		<description>understands that he is a rich dude that is trying to placate disenfranchised paul people, demorats etc.. even at the rnc there was clear signs that they were embracing audirt the fed.. still not up for a viote in the senate even noew though.. if we talking about tape.. wich do u believe more.. current ramblings from romneycare or the past mittens &quot; ben bernake is doing a great job &quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>understands that he is a rich dude that is trying to placate disenfranchised paul people, demorats etc.. even at the rnc there was clear signs that they were embracing audirt the fed.. still not up for a viote in the senate even noew though.. if we talking about tape.. wich do u believe more.. current ramblings from romneycare or the past mittens &#8221; ben bernake is doing a great job &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/20/the-section-of-mitt-romneys-gaffe-tape-you-havent-heard/#comment-167768</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38265#comment-167768</guid>
		<description>First I&#039;m not trying to start anything and don&#039;t need a discussion on who to vote for. I am an independent voter. I want to ask a valid question. If we the people are the ones paying for the govt, which pays for roads bridges etc. and it&#039;s horrible that 47% don&#039;t pay taxes, which makes us have to make &#039;imaginary&#039; money, and this is a bad thing right. But then why is Romney running on lowering the taxes which technically is the same thing and going to put us into the same hole if no one is paying taxes? I don&#039;t need anyone saying your dumb etc. etc. But I would like someone to explain to me (civilly) what the difference is there, cause I don&#039;t see it.
  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First I&#8217;m not trying to start anything and don&#8217;t need a discussion on who to vote for. I am an independent voter. I want to ask a valid question. If we the people are the ones paying for the govt, which pays for roads bridges etc. and it&#8217;s horrible that 47% don&#8217;t pay taxes, which makes us have to make &#8216;imaginary&#8217; money, and this is a bad thing right. But then why is Romney running on lowering the taxes which technically is the same thing and going to put us into the same hole if no one is paying taxes? I don&#8217;t need anyone saying your dumb etc. etc. But I would like someone to explain to me (civilly) what the difference is there, cause I don&#8217;t see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auntie Canuck</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/20/the-section-of-mitt-romneys-gaffe-tape-you-havent-heard/#comment-167686</link>
		<dc:creator>Auntie Canuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 04:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38265#comment-167686</guid>
		<description>Canadians know about it - see Barbara Amiel&#039;s column in MacLeans http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/16/getting-rid-of-the-personal-in-the-political/ - here&#039;s an excerpt:




&quot;In the past four years, the M2 money supply has increased 28 per 
cent, which is 10 times the averaged growth rate. After 220 years of the
 U.S.A.’s existence, the total public debt added up to more than $10 
trillion. In his four years, Obama added more than $5 trillion to that, 
so it now equals 100 per cent of gross domestic product. Here’s how it’s
 done: when a country runs a deficit it sells government bonds to cover 
its bills. In 2011, for example, only about 39 per cent of issued bonds 
were bought by arms-length buyers (retirement funds and banks.) The 
remaining 61 per cent were sold by the Treasury to the Federal Reserve 
that, as part of the government, pays not with cash but notes. The 
Federal Reserve doesn’t pay income tax; earned interest on the notes 
goes back to the Treasury. In the private sector, this would be fraud—a 
colossal Ponzi scheme.



&quot;Inflation doesn’t look as bad as it is because of the bombed-out 
housing market, largely the result of Bill Clinton’s 1995 changes to the
 1977 Community Reinvestment Act. Those changes forced banks to give a 
percentage of residential mortgages to people who couldn’t afford them. 
For good measure, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
 (government agencies privatized by President Lyndon Johnson with a 
comfort letter from the government on their debt) were ordered provide 
51 per cent of mortgages on a similar non-commercial basis. When this 
jerry-built scheme to promote home ownership collapsed, the government 
was left holding the bag for Fannie and Freddie. The political class of 
both parties locked arms and blamed the whole fiasco on private-sector 
greed. About the only person talking any sense on this is Paul Ryan who 
actually understands fiscal policy.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canadians know about it &#8211; see Barbara Amiel&#8217;s column in MacLeans <a href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/16/getting-rid-of-the-personal-in-the-political/" rel="nofollow">http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/09/16/getting-rid-of-the-personal-in-the-political/</a> &#8211; here&#8217;s an excerpt:</p>
<p>&#8220;In the past four years, the M2 money supply has increased 28 per<br />
cent, which is 10 times the averaged growth rate. After 220 years of the<br />
 U.S.A.’s existence, the total public debt added up to more than $10<br />
trillion. In his four years, Obama added more than $5 trillion to that,<br />
so it now equals 100 per cent of gross domestic product. Here’s how it’s<br />
 done: when a country runs a deficit it sells government bonds to cover<br />
its bills. In 2011, for example, only about 39 per cent of issued bonds<br />
were bought by arms-length buyers (retirement funds and banks.) The<br />
remaining 61 per cent were sold by the Treasury to the Federal Reserve<br />
that, as part of the government, pays not with cash but notes. The<br />
Federal Reserve doesn’t pay income tax; earned interest on the notes<br />
goes back to the Treasury. In the private sector, this would be fraud—a<br />
colossal Ponzi scheme.</p>
<p>&#8220;Inflation doesn’t look as bad as it is because of the bombed-out<br />
housing market, largely the result of Bill Clinton’s 1995 changes to the<br />
 1977 Community Reinvestment Act. Those changes forced banks to give a<br />
percentage of residential mortgages to people who couldn’t afford them.<br />
For good measure, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac<br />
 (government agencies privatized by President Lyndon Johnson with a<br />
comfort letter from the government on their debt) were ordered provide<br />
51 per cent of mortgages on a similar non-commercial basis. When this<br />
jerry-built scheme to promote home ownership collapsed, the government<br />
was left holding the bag for Fannie and Freddie. The political class of<br />
both parties locked arms and blamed the whole fiasco on private-sector<br />
greed. About the only person talking any sense on this is Paul Ryan who<br />
actually understands fiscal policy.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XenaWP80</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/20/the-section-of-mitt-romneys-gaffe-tape-you-havent-heard/#comment-167651</link>
		<dc:creator>XenaWP80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38265#comment-167651</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure you take your drinks at the commies meeting you attend. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure you take your drinks at the commies meeting you attend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XenaWP80</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/20/the-section-of-mitt-romneys-gaffe-tape-you-havent-heard/#comment-167649</link>
		<dc:creator>XenaWP80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 23:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38265#comment-167649</guid>
		<description>You are a dipshit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are a dipshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XenaWP80</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/20/the-section-of-mitt-romneys-gaffe-tape-you-havent-heard/#comment-167643</link>
		<dc:creator>XenaWP80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 22:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38265#comment-167643</guid>
		<description>SPAM!!! Go away tiffany.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SPAM!!! Go away tiffany.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yingling777</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/20/the-section-of-mitt-romneys-gaffe-tape-you-havent-heard/#comment-167627</link>
		<dc:creator>yingling777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38265#comment-167627</guid>
		<description>Romney is going to be just as bad as Obama.  The socialist health care is not going away; it is just going to appear to be better.  Beck said himself they work &#039;top down, bottom up&quot;, and that is just what is going on here.  The Democrats take away a ridiculous amount of something, and then the Republicans come in and give you back just a little bit, but there is nobody who can restore it to it&#039;s former self.....EXCEPT a leader,  which we do not have yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romney is going to be just as bad as Obama.  The socialist health care is not going away; it is just going to appear to be better.  Beck said himself they work &#8216;top down, bottom up&#8221;, and that is just what is going on here.  The Democrats take away a ridiculous amount of something, and then the Republicans come in and give you back just a little bit, but there is nobody who can restore it to it&#8217;s former self&#8230;..EXCEPT a leader,  which we do not have yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
