Comments on: Ann Coulter discusses her new book, The View, and the election http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/28/ann-coulter-discusses-her-new-book-the-view-and-the-election/ The Fusion of Entertainment and Enlightenment Sat, 25 May 2013 11:04:00 -0400 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Anonymous http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/28/ann-coulter-discusses-her-new-book-the-view-and-the-election/#comment-171741 Anonymous Mon, 08 Oct 2012 04:36:00 +0000 /?p=38542#comment-171741 Actually, no...it is not a fact that racism is prevalent and simply stating that party affiliation has changed does not make it so, especially in light of the background of those who changed parties. You don't seem to understand how this works, but then again, I have never met a single liberal who could defend their contentions factually. There's a good reason for that...the facts are wildly skewed against you. Actually, no…it is not a fact that racism is prevalent and simply stating that party affiliation has changed does not make it so, especially in light of the background of those who changed parties. You don’t seem to understand how this works, but then again, I have never met a single liberal who could defend their contentions factually. There’s a good reason for that…the facts are wildly skewed against you.

]]> By: Lori Lynne http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/28/ann-coulter-discusses-her-new-book-the-view-and-the-election/#comment-171378 Lori Lynne Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:34:00 +0000 /?p=38542#comment-171378 Honestly, I'm not sure these people getting 'bamaphones, welfare, food stamps, subsidized housing, etc really care about doing anything else with their lives but sitting on their behinds collecting from us sucker-taxpayers. Why would anybody want to be like that for their entire life? Not me! But it just doesn't appear to me that they even care to better themselves for themself and for their children. I have a relative who was seriously injured in a car wreck years ago and IMO, she could qualify for disability and not work. But she chooses to work and it's not a job easy on your back (her back was broken in this wreck). Honestly, I’m not sure these people getting ‘bamaphones, welfare, food stamps, subsidized housing, etc really care about doing anything else with their lives but sitting on their behinds collecting from us sucker-taxpayers. Why would anybody want to be like that for their entire life? Not me! But it just doesn’t appear to me that they even care to better themselves for themself and for their children. I have a relative who was seriously injured in a car wreck years ago and IMO, she could qualify for disability and not work. But she chooses to work and it’s not a job easy on your back (her back was broken in this wreck).

]]> By: ReadYourHistory http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/28/ann-coulter-discusses-her-new-book-the-view-and-the-election/#comment-170650 ReadYourHistory Wed, 03 Oct 2012 13:45:00 +0000 /?p=38542#comment-170650 The 88th U.S. Congress which assembled in Jan. 1965 was 65% and 59% Democrat in the Senate and House respectively. Of the congressmen representing the 11 southern states (former confederate states), 95% of their senators and 90% of their Reps were democrats. Forty years later the majority shifted to the Republicans. The GOP added 20 senators to their tally, 17 came from the South. In the house, the Democrats handed over 53 representatives to the GOP of which 46 came from the South. Today the South has Republicans comprising 72% of their Senators and 73% of their House Representatives. The simple truth is that back then racial intolerance was widespread but the degree to which it appeared had less to do with party affiliation and more to do with geographical location. It is unquestionable that racism was then and still remains most prevalent in the Southeastern States which just happened to be strongly Democratic then and is strongly Republican today. The 88th U.S. Congress which assembled in Jan.
1965 was 65% and 59% Democrat in the Senate and House respectively. Of the
congressmen representing the 11 southern states (former confederate states),
95% of their senators and 90% of their Reps were democrats. Forty years later
the majority shifted to the Republicans. The GOP added 20 senators to their
tally, 17 came from the South. In the house, the Democrats handed over 53
representatives to the GOP of which 46 came from the South. Today the South has
Republicans comprising 72% of their Senators and 73% of their House
Representatives. The simple truth is that back then racial intolerance was
widespread but the degree to which it appeared had less to do with party
affiliation and more to do with geographical location. It is unquestionable
that racism was then and still remains most prevalent in the Southeastern
States which just happened to be strongly Democratic then and is strongly
Republican today.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/28/ann-coulter-discusses-her-new-book-the-view-and-the-election/#comment-170150 Anonymous Tue, 02 Oct 2012 02:36:00 +0000 /?p=38542#comment-170150 12 (posts) of the most unintelligible rants I've ever seen...I suggest you seek some serious professional help...in the mean time get as far away from what's ever in your pipe.. 12 (posts) of the most unintelligible rants I’ve ever seen…I suggest you seek some serious professional help…in the mean time get as far away from what’s ever in your pipe..

]]> By: Desy Nurul Azkiya http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/28/ann-coulter-discusses-her-new-book-the-view-and-the-election/#comment-170125 Desy Nurul Azkiya Tue, 02 Oct 2012 00:40:00 +0000 /?p=38542#comment-170125 manny people blain : manny people blain :

]]> By: Desy Nurul Azkiya http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/28/ann-coulter-discusses-her-new-book-the-view-and-the-election/#comment-170121 Desy Nurul Azkiya Tue, 02 Oct 2012 00:36:00 +0000 /?p=38542#comment-170121 i am can not read : and can not write. but why you more stupid than me? ? ? i am can not read : and can not write. but why you more stupid than me? ? ?

]]> By: VindicatorX http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/28/ann-coulter-discusses-her-new-book-the-view-and-the-election/#comment-170076 VindicatorX Mon, 01 Oct 2012 23:20:00 +0000 /?p=38542#comment-170076 Too true. Too true.

]]> By: Desy Nurul Azkiya http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/28/ann-coulter-discusses-her-new-book-the-view-and-the-election/#comment-170043 Desy Nurul Azkiya Mon, 01 Oct 2012 22:37:00 +0000 /?p=38542#comment-170043 the truth,: the truth,:

]]> By: Desy Nurul Azkiya http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/28/ann-coulter-discusses-her-new-book-the-view-and-the-election/#comment-170040 Desy Nurul Azkiya Mon, 01 Oct 2012 22:35:00 +0000 /?p=38542#comment-170040 i love verry much the true i love verry much the true

]]> By: MarsBarsTru7 http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/09/28/ann-coulter-discusses-her-new-book-the-view-and-the-election/#comment-170041 MarsBarsTru7 Mon, 01 Oct 2012 22:35:00 +0000 /?p=38542#comment-170041 I LOVE Ann Coulter. I've never agreed with anyone 100% of the time, but Ann Coulter is right up there with those I've agreed with the most, and God Bless her she is not apologetic and is not afraid to tell it as she sees it. The one issue I take with her over her appearance on The View is that she appeared on the The View at all. That either her or Elizabeth Hasselbeck spend one minute with that crew of hags and know-nothings on that show is an atrocity in and of itself. They shouldn't blemish the bottoms of their shoes stepping on the same ground. It's like having jewels displayed in a pus pool. And Whoopi is hardly the worst one (What does she know about being white?). At least Whoopi is capable of honesty, even if she's just honestly wrong. The worst one is that repellant excuse for a human being Joy Behar who isn't interested in being correct or moral, she's the epitome of typical liberal bobbleheads towing the line. She only cares about winning, damn the means or ends. And it's not just blacks that are being brainwashed to vote for Democrats. Check out these know-nothings: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wF0tc_khHB4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFkoW8cDRbU&feature=plc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkW0bt-9kO8&feature=plcp http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtUzUrSFkLU&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVK3Od8c0hc There's plenty more. I LOVE Ann Coulter. I’ve never agreed with anyone 100% of the time, but Ann Coulter is right up there with those I’ve agreed with the most, and God Bless her she is not apologetic and is not afraid to tell it as she sees it. The one issue I take with her over her appearance on The View is that she appeared on the The View at all. That either her or Elizabeth Hasselbeck spend one minute with that crew of hags and know-nothings on that show is an atrocity in and of itself. They shouldn’t blemish the bottoms of their shoes stepping on the same ground. It’s like having jewels displayed in a pus pool.

And Whoopi is hardly the worst one (What does she know about being white?). At least Whoopi is capable of honesty, even if she’s just honestly wrong. The worst one is that repellant excuse for a human being Joy Behar who isn’t interested in being correct or moral, she’s the epitome of typical liberal bobbleheads towing the line. She only cares about winning, damn the means or ends.

And it’s not just blacks that are being brainwashed to vote for Democrats. Check out these know-nothings:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wF0tc_khHB4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFkoW8cDRbU&feature=plc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkW0bt-9kO8&feature=plcp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtUzUrSFkLU&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVK3Od8c0hc

There’s plenty more.

]]>