Comments on: Ann Coulter on last night’s debate: “You want this man in the White House”

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 07 Oct 2012 15:51:00 +0000

What is interesting, is when talking about Obama, if people don’t think he has both stages set, man are you mislead. Win, the stage is set, lose,his stage is set. You don’t have an agenda and not look at both sides of winning or losing. With Romney, America knows what they are getting, he is for the upper class & everyone knows this. He did not say anything during the debate that changes my mind that he will help this country. Obama knows win or lose what he needs to do going forward, he was bored at the debate because both stages are set. This country is to divided, this was important to Obama, divide the country. Win, he moves forward with power, lose, moves forward with current power. Losing brings his losing stage to the front, winning pushes his agenda back over the next year or so.

By: Kelly Monaghan Shea

Kelly Monaghan Shea — Fri, 05 Oct 2012 14:54:00 +0000

The worst optics I’ve seen in a while came the day after the debate, when a juiced-up Obama was at a campaign rally throwing insults at Romney in front of an adoring crowd. I think most impartial observers would see a guy who talks tough when there’s no one around to challenge him, but who loses all his mojo when he actually has to face a real competitor.

I was waiting for Romney to appear across the field and say “Why don’t you come over here and say that to my face!”

By: Shane

Shane — Fri, 05 Oct 2012 13:34:00 +0000

Ann is right again. Romney looked good, while Obama looked tired. Ann’s book “Mugged” exposes the way liberals have been manipulating minorities in America to become loyal to the Dimocrat party, although they are not much better off than before they became enslaved to the Dimocrats.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 05 Oct 2012 10:58:00 +0000

He was comfortable and cocky the next day when his rebuttal was written for him and he didn’t have to deal with Romney in person. Wake up undecided and help put a responsible adult in the White house instead of a petulant child.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 05 Oct 2012 08:17:00 +0000

He’ll still have some of the perks even if he loses. He’ll have Secret Service, he can still be addressed as ”Mr. President,” he will still have his adoring fans (and can go on as many TV shows as he desires!), and he will get a good amount of money every month. If he doesn’t want to endure the cold Chicago winters, I’m sure those in La La land will be happy to have him and family and welcome him with open arms.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 05 Oct 2012 08:09:00 +0000

You called it, land. A black fellow on Fox on Thursday, said those are the three things libs like to ”hit”—race, women and class.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 05 Oct 2012 08:06:00 +0000

After the beat down on B.O. Wed. night, the Dems are going to get very ugly in their ads against Romney, I fear. There is only a month before the elections and they have to try as hard as possible to damage Romney (and Ryan) in any way they can. Truth be damned! And about B.O. not wanting to be Prez anymore— Didn’t Mrs. O. make a complaint several months ago about not wanting to be in the WH anymore? Or words to that effect. Could B.O. be tired of all the pretending? I know he really likes the perks but may be, equally, disliking the demands.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 05 Oct 2012 06:50:00 +0000

Chainsaw Mitt carved o’pinocchio into a mini toothprick .

By: rodahaco

rodahaco — Fri, 05 Oct 2012 02:19:00 +0000

That’s just it……he doesn’t want the job, just the perks. And we suffer for it.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 05 Oct 2012 02:02:00 +0000

we should be happy with last night’s debate but remember these people are not that easy. The Marxists plan for everything.
Aren’t you a little surprised and maybe suspicious of such an easy win for Romney yeaterday?