<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xml:base="http://www.glennbeck.com/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama has to wait until campaign rally to challenge Mitt Romney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/05/obama-has-to-wait-until-campaign-rally-to-challenge-mitt-romney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/05/obama-has-to-wait-until-campaign-rally-to-challenge-mitt-romney/</link>
	<description>The Fusion of Entertainment and Enlightenment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 11:04:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/05/obama-has-to-wait-until-campaign-rally-to-challenge-mitt-romney/#comment-171763</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38794#comment-171763</guid>
		<description>Obama is actually quite talented at embarrassing himself through petty attacks on those who have the audacity to not fawn all over him.  Look at his shameful conduct during the installation of George W Bush&#039;s portrait in the white house. He sneered, his remarks literally dripped with overt hatred expressed through unchecked vitriol. There is literally no limit to this guy&#039;s hatred and aggression. 

To a liberal, a disagreement over how to solve a problem equates to &quot;you just want poor people and women to die.&quot; This is so ridiculous that it should be scoffed at and ridiculed by the media, yet they all eat it up. 

Obama is evil. I never used to say that, but I have come to realize that his &quot;quirks&quot; are not quirks-they are, at best, a manifestation of the most towering arrogance I have seen since the time of Stalin, Hitler and Mussolini. To disagree is characterized by the Obama camp as racism, hate and plain old WRONG. The fact that the facts don&#039;t agree with them is no bar to their hatred. There is no such thing as limits. 

When you believe with the fervency of a crusader in the purity of a chosen goal, then, like the knight crusader, there is simply no limit on the types of actions utilized to achieve that goal. Remember, to a liberal, the end always justifies the means. If that means lying, making up numbers and throwing them in the face of true experts who ALL agree you are lying or mathematically incompetent, people should be smart enough to see the difference. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is actually quite talented at embarrassing himself through petty attacks on those who have the audacity to not fawn all over him.  Look at his shameful conduct during the installation of George W Bush&#8217;s portrait in the white house. He sneered, his remarks literally dripped with overt hatred expressed through unchecked vitriol. There is literally no limit to this guy&#8217;s hatred and aggression. </p>
<p>To a liberal, a disagreement over how to solve a problem equates to &#8220;you just want poor people and women to die.&#8221; This is so ridiculous that it should be scoffed at and ridiculed by the media, yet they all eat it up. </p>
<p>Obama is evil. I never used to say that, but I have come to realize that his &#8220;quirks&#8221; are not quirks-they are, at best, a manifestation of the most towering arrogance I have seen since the time of Stalin, Hitler and Mussolini. To disagree is characterized by the Obama camp as racism, hate and plain old WRONG. The fact that the facts don&#8217;t agree with them is no bar to their hatred. There is no such thing as limits. </p>
<p>When you believe with the fervency of a crusader in the purity of a chosen goal, then, like the knight crusader, there is simply no limit on the types of actions utilized to achieve that goal. Remember, to a liberal, the end always justifies the means. If that means lying, making up numbers and throwing them in the face of true experts who ALL agree you are lying or mathematically incompetent, people should be smart enough to see the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/05/obama-has-to-wait-until-campaign-rally-to-challenge-mitt-romney/#comment-171750</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38794#comment-171750</guid>
		<description>Obama thought he was as smart as Chris Matthews thinks he is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama thought he was as smart as Chris Matthews thinks he is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: new2la</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/05/obama-has-to-wait-until-campaign-rally-to-challenge-mitt-romney/#comment-171681</link>
		<dc:creator>new2la</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38794#comment-171681</guid>
		<description>Not only a coward mrsgayle,   But a TelePrompTer and a mic in his ears with a little voice giving him the answers and prompting him along.     The puppet and his handlers in action!      It would be comical if it weren&#039;t so serious.    No one is laughing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only a coward mrsgayle,   But a TelePrompTer and a mic in his ears with a little voice giving him the answers and prompting him along.     The puppet and his handlers in action!      It would be comical if it weren&#8217;t so serious.    No one is laughing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/05/obama-has-to-wait-until-campaign-rally-to-challenge-mitt-romney/#comment-171679</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38794#comment-171679</guid>
		<description>On what Romney should say for the next debate on foreign policy !!!  He should make it very Clear that he will not misuse his office position to create treaties and agreements with the U.N as some presidents !! That go around our constitution, congress, citizens in giving away our nation sovereign on our internal domestic laws ,with agreement that will shreds our constitution,civil rights and freedoms !    1.) Submit U.S citizens to U.N dictates to control and eliminate firearm possession by the individual ,while other country their people have machine guns,mortars,rocket-propel grenade ,hand held anti-aircraft missiles,explosives etc !!!!  He want to leave U.S citizens defenseless for his setting the stage for riots and chaos and when obama government come down hard from the top with Soviet style police state with secret  police no warrants,no rights ,no freedoms ,no constitution we be defenseless !!!!  2.) A agreement that Hillary sign with U.N no bashing Islam religion even the radical elements that is at war with us ????  Infringes on our sovereignty again our freedom of speech,plus it will make Islam religion the prefer religion and all others  2nd , this is against our constitution to make one religion prefer religion by our country !!!  3.)  Dick Morris mention obama is working on agreement with the U.N again to give control of internet in our country to U.N ,this will Muzzle our freedom of speech by their monitoring and restriction dictates ,plus restrict our freedom of assembly on line !! Our President speech to U.N seems to me like double talk or the meaning of is is ???? ( the future won&#039;t belong to those who slander Islam,it should be of any religion ,what you going to do obama make Islam the prefer religion of the world ?????? and let U.N dictate to our citizens !!!!! Then obama made another statement that Iran nuclear weapons will not be contain ??? It obama green light to go for nuclear weapons  with double talk ???????  Romney should say foreign agreements and treaties are not meant to be use to shred our constitution that set the base our nation government for the people by the people, Plus our internal laws come from our Constitution, Congress,Supreme Courts,citizens not some foreign body !!!  Romney say I will never submit to  surrendering our  nation sovereign with some sneaky illegal to constitution with agreements or treaties with the U.N or any other country and if want try to take our constitution away,our freedoms and rights you will have to fight our military !!!!  What in the world obama doing ? He is illegally  using foreign policy agreements to effects our laws and internal working our government ,suppose for dealing with foreign countries not our constitution !!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On what Romney should say for the next debate on foreign policy !!!  He should make it very Clear that he will not misuse his office position to create treaties and agreements with the U.N as some presidents !! That go around our constitution, congress, citizens in giving away our nation sovereign on our internal domestic laws ,with agreement that will shreds our constitution,civil rights and freedoms !    1.) Submit U.S citizens to U.N dictates to control and eliminate firearm possession by the individual ,while other country their people have machine guns,mortars,rocket-propel grenade ,hand held anti-aircraft missiles,explosives etc !!!!  He want to leave U.S citizens defenseless for his setting the stage for riots and chaos and when obama government come down hard from the top with Soviet style police state with secret  police no warrants,no rights ,no freedoms ,no constitution we be defenseless !!!!  2.) A agreement that Hillary sign with U.N no bashing Islam religion even the radical elements that is at war with us ????  Infringes on our sovereignty again our freedom of speech,plus it will make Islam religion the prefer religion and all others  2nd , this is against our constitution to make one religion prefer religion by our country !!!  3.)  Dick Morris mention obama is working on agreement with the U.N again to give control of internet in our country to U.N ,this will Muzzle our freedom of speech by their monitoring and restriction dictates ,plus restrict our freedom of assembly on line !! Our President speech to U.N seems to me like double talk or the meaning of is is ???? ( the future won&#8217;t belong to those who slander Islam,it should be of any religion ,what you going to do obama make Islam the prefer religion of the world ?????? and let U.N dictate to our citizens !!!!! Then obama made another statement that Iran nuclear weapons will not be contain ??? It obama green light to go for nuclear weapons  with double talk ???????  Romney should say foreign agreements and treaties are not meant to be use to shred our constitution that set the base our nation government for the people by the people, Plus our internal laws come from our Constitution, Congress,Supreme Courts,citizens not some foreign body !!!  Romney say I will never submit to  surrendering our  nation sovereign with some sneaky illegal to constitution with agreements or treaties with the U.N or any other country and if want try to take our constitution away,our freedoms and rights you will have to fight our military !!!!  What in the world obama doing ? He is illegally  using foreign policy agreements to effects our laws and internal working our government ,suppose for dealing with foreign countries not our constitution !!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/05/obama-has-to-wait-until-campaign-rally-to-challenge-mitt-romney/#comment-171627</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38794#comment-171627</guid>
		<description>Sure and next you are going to tell me you have a pet unicorn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure and next you are going to tell me you have a pet unicorn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/05/obama-has-to-wait-until-campaign-rally-to-challenge-mitt-romney/#comment-171621</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38794#comment-171621</guid>
		<description>He is a coward, </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is a coward,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoThere</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/05/obama-has-to-wait-until-campaign-rally-to-challenge-mitt-romney/#comment-171619</link>
		<dc:creator>SoThere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38794#comment-171619</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not about Glenn Beck you vulgar little bigot. Your man Obama couldn&#039;t hold a conversation without a teleprompter in front of his nose.  those behind the scenes tell him what to say and without it hes just a stupid moron who can&#039;t speak for himself.


Strtlk&#039;s an Obama cultist making excuses for his miserable showing in the debate.


Strtlk is jealous of Beck and has an unhealthy fixation on him, he also has a sickness for little children.


Go clean some toilets strtlk and remember, those white and blue things in the urinals are not mints!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not about Glenn Beck you vulgar little bigot. Your man Obama couldn&#8217;t hold a conversation without a teleprompter in front of his nose.  those behind the scenes tell him what to say and without it hes just a stupid moron who can&#8217;t speak for himself.</p>
<p>Strtlk&#8217;s an Obama cultist making excuses for his miserable showing in the debate.</p>
<p>Strtlk is jealous of Beck and has an unhealthy fixation on him, he also has a sickness for little children.</p>
<p>Go clean some toilets strtlk and remember, those white and blue things in the urinals are not mints!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarsBarsTru7</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/05/obama-has-to-wait-until-campaign-rally-to-challenge-mitt-romney/#comment-171590</link>
		<dc:creator>MarsBarsTru7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 05:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38794#comment-171590</guid>
		<description>Because he knows his typical audiences respond to this type of speech. They&#039;re used to it. Many of the people that actually pay to go to a proper Democrat Presidential rally are religious Christian people. They aren&#039;t the secular liberal Progressive elites. Progressives have rallies without the President. Or, they go to expensive dinners. 

The ugly truth is that secular Progressives are the &quot;haves&quot; of the Democratic party while the typical Democrats (the masses) are &quot;have nots&quot;, the dupes that believe that they&#039;re doing good for the world by voting for entitlements (which is most of what the Democrat Party feeds to them). 

This is especially true for the black community. Why do you think Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson are so important for Democrats to truck out in front of any Democrat position and conflict with Republicans? The majority of blacks in this country are devout religious people that sincerely want to do good. Poverty and cultural breakdown causes severe impediments to this, but it doesn&#039;t take away from their intentions. Yes, we on the right know that it is misguided to use a increasingly secular bureaucracy to do social good. But they don&#039;t see it that way. They, like the white Christian Democrats, believe that the Democrat party is more compassionate because they present all these *wonderful* programs to *help* everyone.

Never mind the fact that their core values clash sharply with the Democrat platform on many issues. The best example of which is gay marriage. Proposition 8 in California was passed in the popular vote largely because over 80% of the black voting population voted for it. They overwhelmingly rejected gay marriage. But, because their cultural leaders are so overwhelmingly bias for Democrats, they fail to see these differences and hold Democrats accountable for them.

The Democrat elites know all this. More importantly, Obama knows this. He knows it acutely. Moreover, he has the speaking skills to mimic the preacher tones that Christian Democrats are familiar with. So, when it is time for Obama to stand in front of a crowd of middle class Democrats, a group that is largely made up of genuinely caring Christian people, he panders to them. (Harry Reid and Biden - well, Biden tries - have done this quite a bit too.)

It&#039;s the political equivalent of Romney getting up in front of a Jewish crowd and suddenly using a Queens-like Yiddish filled commentary. Or, if Romney was talking to a crowd of largely white people in the Midwest, he spoke with a twang and a lot of &quot;dangs&quot; and &quot;yessiree&quot; type colloquialisms.

It could very easily be interpreted as extremely insulting and condescending. But, the mainstream media would only point that out if a Republican candidate did it. And they have. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because he knows his typical audiences respond to this type of speech. They&#8217;re used to it. Many of the people that actually pay to go to a proper Democrat Presidential rally are religious Christian people. They aren&#8217;t the secular liberal Progressive elites. Progressives have rallies without the President. Or, they go to expensive dinners. </p>
<p>The ugly truth is that secular Progressives are the &#8220;haves&#8221; of the Democratic party while the typical Democrats (the masses) are &#8220;have nots&#8221;, the dupes that believe that they&#8217;re doing good for the world by voting for entitlements (which is most of what the Democrat Party feeds to them). </p>
<p>This is especially true for the black community. Why do you think Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson are so important for Democrats to truck out in front of any Democrat position and conflict with Republicans? The majority of blacks in this country are devout religious people that sincerely want to do good. Poverty and cultural breakdown causes severe impediments to this, but it doesn&#8217;t take away from their intentions. Yes, we on the right know that it is misguided to use a increasingly secular bureaucracy to do social good. But they don&#8217;t see it that way. They, like the white Christian Democrats, believe that the Democrat party is more compassionate because they present all these *wonderful* programs to *help* everyone.</p>
<p>Never mind the fact that their core values clash sharply with the Democrat platform on many issues. The best example of which is gay marriage. Proposition 8 in California was passed in the popular vote largely because over 80% of the black voting population voted for it. They overwhelmingly rejected gay marriage. But, because their cultural leaders are so overwhelmingly bias for Democrats, they fail to see these differences and hold Democrats accountable for them.</p>
<p>The Democrat elites know all this. More importantly, Obama knows this. He knows it acutely. Moreover, he has the speaking skills to mimic the preacher tones that Christian Democrats are familiar with. So, when it is time for Obama to stand in front of a crowd of middle class Democrats, a group that is largely made up of genuinely caring Christian people, he panders to them. (Harry Reid and Biden &#8211; well, Biden tries &#8211; have done this quite a bit too.)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the political equivalent of Romney getting up in front of a Jewish crowd and suddenly using a Queens-like Yiddish filled commentary. Or, if Romney was talking to a crowd of largely white people in the Midwest, he spoke with a twang and a lot of &#8220;dangs&#8221; and &#8220;yessiree&#8221; type colloquialisms.</p>
<p>It could very easily be interpreted as extremely insulting and condescending. But, the mainstream media would only point that out if a Republican candidate did it. And they have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greywolfrs</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/05/obama-has-to-wait-until-campaign-rally-to-challenge-mitt-romney/#comment-171585</link>
		<dc:creator>greywolfrs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 05:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38794#comment-171585</guid>
		<description>Hey, it&#039;s sticky chin the coward. Hey stupid, how many times have you run for office? None. So, how is it that you know this &quot;etiquette&quot; without ever having run? Seems to me that you are projecting again. Moron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, it&#8217;s sticky chin the coward. Hey stupid, how many times have you run for office? None. So, how is it that you know this &#8220;etiquette&#8221; without ever having run? Seems to me that you are projecting again. Moron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/05/obama-has-to-wait-until-campaign-rally-to-challenge-mitt-romney/#comment-171576</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38794#comment-171576</guid>
		<description>As was mentioned before, Gk, B.O. spent about 20 years in Rev. Wright&#039;s church. Must have liked what he heard, or at least, the style used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As was mentioned before, Gk, B.O. spent about 20 years in Rev. Wright&#8217;s church. Must have liked what he heard, or at least, the style used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
