<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xml:base="http://www.glennbeck.com/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama in trouble as America begins to discover the real Mitt Romney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/10/obama-in-trouble-as-america-begins-to-discover-the-real-mitt-romney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/10/obama-in-trouble-as-america-begins-to-discover-the-real-mitt-romney/</link>
	<description>The Fusion of Entertainment and Enlightenment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 21:03:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Major</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/10/obama-in-trouble-as-america-begins-to-discover-the-real-mitt-romney/#comment-175143</link>
		<dc:creator>The Major</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 07:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38893#comment-175143</guid>
		<description>If the obama glove don&#039;t FIT,,,you MUST vote  MITT!!!
Pass it on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the obama glove don&#8217;t FIT,,,you MUST vote  MITT!!!<br />
Pass it on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/10/obama-in-trouble-as-america-begins-to-discover-the-real-mitt-romney/#comment-174551</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38893#comment-174551</guid>
		<description>Ditto to all you said, guys. Last year, Obama threw out his economic advisors and put out an edict that anyone who talked about the economy was fired. So for months, he was not getting ANY economic advice. The fool who believes that Obama is simply misguided is a fool. His upbringing from his mother and her family was steeped in pro-Soviet indoctrination. Even when he was sent by his mother to live with his grandparents in Hawaii, he was daily schooled in communist and soviet doctrines and introduced to Frank Marshall Davis, a communist who worked for a pro-Soviet newspaper put out in Hawaii. Frank Marshall Davis and his grandfather brainwashed him on how to use Marxist doctrine to destroy capitalistic societies using revolution and destructive economic policy methodologies. 
This has been the motivation behind Obama&#039;s seeming ineptitude with economic policy. There is no ineptitude here at all. This is a plan. What is the recommendation of Obama&#039;s mentors as the fastest way to destroy economies? Debt. Deficit spending combined with riots and uprising against what Obama considers to be an occupying force in the world (the US) through revolutionary movements against success (remember Occupy Wall Street?) and finished off through tax policy that punishes those who economically disadvantage the proletariat by the removal of scarce resources that, by right, belong to the people. These criminals are nothing more than those who have succeeded. To top it all off, in order to ensure the success of this campaign, children must be taught that their parents are ignorant fools who suffer from terminal selfishness. This virtually guarantees future success because the next generations have all been indoctrinated in revisionist history and policies of hate for those who have successfully managed the American Dream through hard work. They are taught that this is not hard work, it is the naked lust for money and that the only way to cure it is to ruthlessly punish it. This is the Obama legacy. 
Obama and his team are responsible for the accuracy of the numbers released by the labor department. Why do you think that suddenly, in the face of an economy with more tepid growth than was seen during the Great Depression, that suddenly, Obama&#039;s economic policies are responsible for the largest single month improvement in job creation in 29 years announced in the month prior to the election? Not even the most liberal of economists predicted those results, yet Obama claims that they are not only real numbers, but his policies and deficit spending are the reasons for this economic record. Uh huh. The problem with it is that the constituency of the liberal left is not politically literate because they have been part of the brainwashing that makes them militantly, indignantly demanding of their &quot;entitlements&quot; simply for nothing more than the fact of their existence. Lying about everything else is as natural as breathing because of the mindlessness of those on the left. Conservatives are often the ones accused of this, but the wonderful part of being liberal is that facts are completely beside the point. You don&#039;t have to know anything so long as your ideology is in alignment with them because facts can be made up and dressed up as much as you like because the MSM will fight like their lives depend on it no matter the towering stupidity it would take to live this way. But, so long as they get their pablum of entitlement, no problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto to all you said, guys. Last year, Obama threw out his economic advisors and put out an edict that anyone who talked about the economy was fired. So for months, he was not getting ANY economic advice. The fool who believes that Obama is simply misguided is a fool. His upbringing from his mother and her family was steeped in pro-Soviet indoctrination. Even when he was sent by his mother to live with his grandparents in Hawaii, he was daily schooled in communist and soviet doctrines and introduced to Frank Marshall Davis, a communist who worked for a pro-Soviet newspaper put out in Hawaii. Frank Marshall Davis and his grandfather brainwashed him on how to use Marxist doctrine to destroy capitalistic societies using revolution and destructive economic policy methodologies.<br />
This has been the motivation behind Obama&#8217;s seeming ineptitude with economic policy. There is no ineptitude here at all. This is a plan. What is the recommendation of Obama&#8217;s mentors as the fastest way to destroy economies? Debt. Deficit spending combined with riots and uprising against what Obama considers to be an occupying force in the world (the US) through revolutionary movements against success (remember Occupy Wall Street?) and finished off through tax policy that punishes those who economically disadvantage the proletariat by the removal of scarce resources that, by right, belong to the people. These criminals are nothing more than those who have succeeded. To top it all off, in order to ensure the success of this campaign, children must be taught that their parents are ignorant fools who suffer from terminal selfishness. This virtually guarantees future success because the next generations have all been indoctrinated in revisionist history and policies of hate for those who have successfully managed the American Dream through hard work. They are taught that this is not hard work, it is the naked lust for money and that the only way to cure it is to ruthlessly punish it. This is the Obama legacy.<br />
Obama and his team are responsible for the accuracy of the numbers released by the labor department. Why do you think that suddenly, in the face of an economy with more tepid growth than was seen during the Great Depression, that suddenly, Obama&#8217;s economic policies are responsible for the largest single month improvement in job creation in 29 years announced in the month prior to the election? Not even the most liberal of economists predicted those results, yet Obama claims that they are not only real numbers, but his policies and deficit spending are the reasons for this economic record. Uh huh. The problem with it is that the constituency of the liberal left is not politically literate because they have been part of the brainwashing that makes them militantly, indignantly demanding of their &#8220;entitlements&#8221; simply for nothing more than the fact of their existence. Lying about everything else is as natural as breathing because of the mindlessness of those on the left. Conservatives are often the ones accused of this, but the wonderful part of being liberal is that facts are completely beside the point. You don&#8217;t have to know anything so long as your ideology is in alignment with them because facts can be made up and dressed up as much as you like because the MSM will fight like their lives depend on it no matter the towering stupidity it would take to live this way. But, so long as they get their pablum of entitlement, no problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/10/obama-in-trouble-as-america-begins-to-discover-the-real-mitt-romney/#comment-174250</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38893#comment-174250</guid>
		<description>Ditto to all you said, guys. Last year, Obama threw out his economic advisors and put out an edict that anyone who talked about the economy was fired. So for months, he was not getting ANY economic advice. The fool who believes that Obama is simply misguided is a fool. His upbringing from his mother and her family was steeped in pro-Soviet indoctrination. Even when he was sent by his mother to live with his grandparents in Hawaii, he was daily schooled in communist and soviet doctrines and introduced to Frank Marshall Davis, a communist who worked for a pro-Soviet newspaper put out in Hawaii. Frank Marshall Davis and his grandfather brainwashed him on how to use Marxist doctrine to destroy capitalistic societies using revolution and destructive economic policy methodologies. 
This has been the motivation behind Obama&#039;s seeming ineptitude with economic policy. There is no ineptitude here at all. This is a plan. What is the recommendation of Obama&#039;s mentors as the fastest way to destroy economies? Debt. Deficit spending combined with riots and uprising against what Obama considers to be an occupying force in the world (the US) through revolutionary movements against success (remember Occupy Wall Street?) and finished off through tax policy that punishes those who economically disadvantage the proletariat by the removal of scarce resources that, by right, belong to the people. These criminals are nothing more than those who have succeeded. To top it all off, in order to ensure the success of this campaign, children must be taught that their parents are ignorant fools who suffer from terminal selfishness. This virtually guarantees future success because the next generations have all been indoctrinated in revisionist history and policies of hate for those who have successfully managed the American Dream through hard work. They are taught that this is not hard work, it is the naked lust for money and that the only way to cure it is to ruthlessly punish it. This is the Obama legacy. 
Obama and his team are responsible for the accuracy of the numbers released by the labor department. Why do you think that suddenly, in the face of an economy with more tepid growth than was seen during the Great Depression, that suddenly, Obama&#039;s economic policies are responsible for the largest single month improvement in job creation in 29 years announced in the month prior to the election? Not even the most liberal of economists predicted those results, yet Obama claims that they are not only real numbers, but his policies and deficit spending are the reasons for this economic record. Uh huh. The problem with it is that the constituency of the liberal left is not politically literate because they have been part of the brainwashing that makes them militantly, indignantly demanding of their &quot;entitlements&quot; simply for nothing more than the fact of their existence. Lying about everything else is as natural as breathing because of the mindlessness of those on the left. Conservatives are often the ones accused of this, but the wonderful part of being liberal is that facts are completely beside the point. You don&#039;t have to know anything so long as your ideology is in alignment with them because facts can be made up and dressed up as much as you like because the MSM will fight like their lives depend on it no matter the towering stupidity it would take to live this way. But, so long as they get their pablum of entitlement, no problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto to all you said, guys. Last year, Obama threw out his economic advisors and put out an edict that anyone who talked about the economy was fired. So for months, he was not getting ANY economic advice. The fool who believes that Obama is simply misguided is a fool. His upbringing from his mother and her family was steeped in pro-Soviet indoctrination. Even when he was sent by his mother to live with his grandparents in Hawaii, he was daily schooled in communist and soviet doctrines and introduced to Frank Marshall Davis, a communist who worked for a pro-Soviet newspaper put out in Hawaii. Frank Marshall Davis and his grandfather brainwashed him on how to use Marxist doctrine to destroy capitalistic societies using revolution and destructive economic policy methodologies.<br />
This has been the motivation behind Obama&#8217;s seeming ineptitude with economic policy. There is no ineptitude here at all. This is a plan. What is the recommendation of Obama&#8217;s mentors as the fastest way to destroy economies? Debt. Deficit spending combined with riots and uprising against what Obama considers to be an occupying force in the world (the US) through revolutionary movements against success (remember Occupy Wall Street?) and finished off through tax policy that punishes those who economically disadvantage the proletariat by the removal of scarce resources that, by right, belong to the people. These criminals are nothing more than those who have succeeded. To top it all off, in order to ensure the success of this campaign, children must be taught that their parents are ignorant fools who suffer from terminal selfishness. This virtually guarantees future success because the next generations have all been indoctrinated in revisionist history and policies of hate for those who have successfully managed the American Dream through hard work. They are taught that this is not hard work, it is the naked lust for money and that the only way to cure it is to ruthlessly punish it. This is the Obama legacy.<br />
Obama and his team are responsible for the accuracy of the numbers released by the labor department. Why do you think that suddenly, in the face of an economy with more tepid growth than was seen during the Great Depression, that suddenly, Obama&#8217;s economic policies are responsible for the largest single month improvement in job creation in 29 years announced in the month prior to the election? Not even the most liberal of economists predicted those results, yet Obama claims that they are not only real numbers, but his policies and deficit spending are the reasons for this economic record. Uh huh. The problem with it is that the constituency of the liberal left is not politically literate because they have been part of the brainwashing that makes them militantly, indignantly demanding of their &#8220;entitlements&#8221; simply for nothing more than the fact of their existence. Lying about everything else is as natural as breathing because of the mindlessness of those on the left. Conservatives are often the ones accused of this, but the wonderful part of being liberal is that facts are completely beside the point. You don&#8217;t have to know anything so long as your ideology is in alignment with them because facts can be made up and dressed up as much as you like because the MSM will fight like their lives depend on it no matter the towering stupidity it would take to live this way. But, so long as they get their pablum of entitlement, no problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/10/obama-in-trouble-as-america-begins-to-discover-the-real-mitt-romney/#comment-173382</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38893#comment-173382</guid>
		<description>Excellent points, all. I completely agree. In fact, last year, he got tired of hearing economic &quot;advice&quot; during his morning briefings. Apparently, because all his policies were doing was causing pain, even the most liberal of Keynsian economists could paint the picture any prettier. Truly, a manifestation of the validity of the phrase, &quot;A pig with lipstick is still a pig&quot;. One day, his temper blew and economists were suddenly banned. So, when he acts as if he knows what the direct results of his economic policies are, he&#039;s not lying. The problem is, most people assume that his actions are benign and simply the result of amateurish mishandling of the economy. Nope. This is actually part of the plan. Destroy the economy and you can more easily implement marxist policy because the country will be panicked and the economy will be in free fall. Obama knows (as does every single economist on earth) that taxes are not going to win the day. 
In 2008, during his first run for president, Charlie Gibson (a mega liberal reporter), during an interview, told Obama that, historically, it has been shown that when capital gains taxes are raised, it hurts the people that it is supposed to be benefiting because even little old ladies invested in mutual funds pay capital gains on investment earnings. Everyone thinks that capital gains taxes are only paid by the most wealthy, but that is far from the truth. Its pain is felt far more than direct income taxes. Gibson also pointed out that every single time that the capital gains tax has been raised, FEWER taxes are collected. He also pointed out the negative effect that this type of tax has on business. When capital gains taxes are raised, jobs are lost, NOT gained (as stated by Joe Biden during the VP debate) because this is how business pays for expansion and growth. Gibson asked him if, knowing this, would he still proceed. Obama didn&#039;t hesitate. He said, Yes I would. Charlie Gibson was kind of taken aback by his statement and asked Obama why he would go forward even though the opposite effect was seen from his stated purpose in raising the tax. Obama stated that the results didn&#039;t matter as much as doing &quot;What&#039;s fair&quot;. 
This is typical liberal speak. Factually, liberalism has no concrete support. The facts are stacked far, far, against them, but it doesn&#039;t matter. Results don&#039;t matter. Bad results don&#039;t matter. Harming the middle class and the poor don&#039;t matter. It&#039;s &quot;what&#039;s fair&quot;, clearly demonstrating the liberal penchant to place ideology over results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points, all. I completely agree. In fact, last year, he got tired of hearing economic &#8220;advice&#8221; during his morning briefings. Apparently, because all his policies were doing was causing pain, even the most liberal of Keynsian economists could paint the picture any prettier. Truly, a manifestation of the validity of the phrase, &#8220;A pig with lipstick is still a pig&#8221;. One day, his temper blew and economists were suddenly banned. So, when he acts as if he knows what the direct results of his economic policies are, he&#8217;s not lying. The problem is, most people assume that his actions are benign and simply the result of amateurish mishandling of the economy. Nope. This is actually part of the plan. Destroy the economy and you can more easily implement marxist policy because the country will be panicked and the economy will be in free fall. Obama knows (as does every single economist on earth) that taxes are not going to win the day.<br />
In 2008, during his first run for president, Charlie Gibson (a mega liberal reporter), during an interview, told Obama that, historically, it has been shown that when capital gains taxes are raised, it hurts the people that it is supposed to be benefiting because even little old ladies invested in mutual funds pay capital gains on investment earnings. Everyone thinks that capital gains taxes are only paid by the most wealthy, but that is far from the truth. Its pain is felt far more than direct income taxes. Gibson also pointed out that every single time that the capital gains tax has been raised, FEWER taxes are collected. He also pointed out the negative effect that this type of tax has on business. When capital gains taxes are raised, jobs are lost, NOT gained (as stated by Joe Biden during the VP debate) because this is how business pays for expansion and growth. Gibson asked him if, knowing this, would he still proceed. Obama didn&#8217;t hesitate. He said, Yes I would. Charlie Gibson was kind of taken aback by his statement and asked Obama why he would go forward even though the opposite effect was seen from his stated purpose in raising the tax. Obama stated that the results didn&#8217;t matter as much as doing &#8220;What&#8217;s fair&#8221;.<br />
This is typical liberal speak. Factually, liberalism has no concrete support. The facts are stacked far, far, against them, but it doesn&#8217;t matter. Results don&#8217;t matter. Bad results don&#8217;t matter. Harming the middle class and the poor don&#8217;t matter. It&#8217;s &#8220;what&#8217;s fair&#8221;, clearly demonstrating the liberal penchant to place ideology over results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Major</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/10/obama-in-trouble-as-america-begins-to-discover-the-real-mitt-romney/#comment-173312</link>
		<dc:creator>The Major</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 07:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38893#comment-173312</guid>
		<description>To Greywolfrs,,,You are right,,,he LIES.   I spoke to 3 buds in the H/C biz &amp; in their Professional opinion ,,even when I asked separately,,,they came to the same answer.
Obama suffers from  NPD,,,Narcissistic Personality Disorder,,,which can be traced to his childhood upbringing.  If ANYTHING or ANYBODY out there,,be it his &quot;Inner Circle&quot; of fellow Marxists,,,or Pols. who come up with SOUND economic advice,,,,he will be polite to them,,,thank them for their input,,,,,BUT,,,,this is important,,,,BUT,,,go and do just what he wanted to do in the 1st place,,according to IS OWN IDEAS.  His EGO will NOT allow it ANY other way.  Paul Ryan came up with a budget &amp; the Senate rejected it 54-46,,,,close,,,but no cigar.     Obama came up with his OWN budget &amp; it must have been a doozy,,,for the Senate shot it down 99 to O,,not ONE Democrat voted for it.
This Marxist Muslim POTUS was SET UP in office,,NOT voted in,,(my opinion) to do what his &quot;Fellow Travelers&quot; wanted him to do.   He has ONE track in mind &amp; TWO rails on that track,,,,,1) to install Gov&#039;t run H/C to cover all of us ,,,whether we want it or NOT,,&amp; he does NOT care if it BANKRUPTS  the USA,,,for he is covered by his own plan,,like the Congress,,,,,2) the SECOND rail is the RE-DISTRIBUTION  of wealth,,,yours &amp; mine,&amp; send it ALL over the world ,,,to the UN,,,to the Muslim Brotherhood,,in the guise of Re-Building Mosques ,,,when the Greek Orthodox church at &quot;Ground Zero&quot; got NOTHING.&amp; keep on sending it &#039;til WE are BROKE &amp; the THIRD WORLD  is WEALTHIER.
If the obamaglove don&#039;t FIT,,,you MUST vote MITT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Greywolfrs,,,You are right,,,he LIES.   I spoke to 3 buds in the H/C biz &amp; in their Professional opinion ,,even when I asked separately,,,they came to the same answer.<br />
Obama suffers from  NPD,,,Narcissistic Personality Disorder,,,which can be traced to his childhood upbringing.  If ANYTHING or ANYBODY out there,,be it his &#8220;Inner Circle&#8221; of fellow Marxists,,,or Pols. who come up with SOUND economic advice,,,,he will be polite to them,,,thank them for their input,,,,,BUT,,,,this is important,,,,BUT,,,go and do just what he wanted to do in the 1st place,,according to IS OWN IDEAS.  His EGO will NOT allow it ANY other way.  Paul Ryan came up with a budget &amp; the Senate rejected it 54-46,,,,close,,,but no cigar.     Obama came up with his OWN budget &amp; it must have been a doozy,,,for the Senate shot it down 99 to O,,not ONE Democrat voted for it.<br />
This Marxist Muslim POTUS was SET UP in office,,NOT voted in,,(my opinion) to do what his &#8220;Fellow Travelers&#8221; wanted him to do.   He has ONE track in mind &amp; TWO rails on that track,,,,,1) to install Gov&#8217;t run H/C to cover all of us ,,,whether we want it or NOT,,&amp; he does NOT care if it BANKRUPTS  the USA,,,for he is covered by his own plan,,like the Congress,,,,,2) the SECOND rail is the RE-DISTRIBUTION  of wealth,,,yours &amp; mine,&amp; send it ALL over the world ,,,to the UN,,,to the Muslim Brotherhood,,in the guise of Re-Building Mosques ,,,when the Greek Orthodox church at &#8220;Ground Zero&#8221; got NOTHING.&amp; keep on sending it &#8217;til WE are BROKE &amp; the THIRD WORLD  is WEALTHIER.<br />
If the obamaglove don&#8217;t FIT,,,you MUST vote MITT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/10/obama-in-trouble-as-america-begins-to-discover-the-real-mitt-romney/#comment-173023</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38893#comment-173023</guid>
		<description> That&#039;s because there&#039;s nothing to debate. What point did you make that is contentious? That people can&#039;t make God what they it/him/she to be, or, what they want it/him/she to do?
 If one understands the meaning of the word God it is a forgone conclusion that no one has control over it/him/she, isn&#039;t it?
 You&#039;ll need to provide something with a little more gusto if you want a debate on religion or God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s because there&#8217;s nothing to debate. What point did you make that is contentious? That people can&#8217;t make God what they it/him/she to be, or, what they want it/him/she to do?<br />
 If one understands the meaning of the word God it is a forgone conclusion that no one has control over it/him/she, isn&#8217;t it?<br />
 You&#8217;ll need to provide something with a little more gusto if you want a debate on religion or God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/10/obama-in-trouble-as-america-begins-to-discover-the-real-mitt-romney/#comment-173021</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38893#comment-173021</guid>
		<description>What fact? All I&#039;ve seen in your posts is mocking. I agree that the profanity is not a way to argue, but I have no idea what &quot;fact&quot; you want to debate. I&#039;ve reviewed your posts and you haven&#039;t made any point at all, other than to try to provoke an argument over word usage. Come up with something of substance, perhaps something factual. Just being liberal doesn&#039;t win the day. The facts are not on your side, though. 
It always amazes me that liberals never want to look at history. We already have examples of socialism/wealth redistribution on a scale made large from many different countries, including the social experiments in the United States. The Great Society has utterly failed. We simply cannot spend past our ability to finance at a rate of  $1.6 trillion per year and expect that we can keep increasing how much we spend so that 1/2 of the country won&#039;t have to pay taxes and will be able to draw on the common treasury. 
Obama stated in 2008 that, in three years, if the economy isn&#039;t recovered, if the deficit isn&#039;t halved, that the buck would stop with him. Has it? Every time he or Biden speak they whine about evil George W. Bush and how he caused all of this. They have nearly quadrupled the national debt in 3 years, does that count? Yet, it is still someone else&#039;s fault. Their foreign policy is a shambles. The Middle East is on fire and his constant apologies have emboldened the terrorists and further destabilized the Middle East and Europe. And what is their new idea for the next 4 years? Continue doing the same thing. Increase spending, but we don&#039;t have to worry about it. After all, only the 120,000 people in the US who make more than $8,000,000/yr are going to pay. Now that&#039;s what I call fiscal responsibility! Heck, why not take every dime that those 120,000 people make? Excellent idea. If we are being generous, we might make it about 4-6 days. That is ALL of their income. Obama/Biden does not believe in the American dream, they think that anyone who has ingenuity and has become successful, pulling themselves and their family out of poverty have somehow stolen something from a fixed amount of limited resources. Really? Go ahead and take all of that away. Take every dime from those who make more than $250,000/yr. and the same results. By the way, those people did not gain that income in a vacuum. It largely comes from providing jobs and building successful businesses. But hey, since those businesses send their good to market on roads, they didn&#039;t build their businesses and their success is NOT due to ingenuity and work ethic, it&#039;s just an accident, making it A-OK to take their money and give it away to the &quot;unlucky&quot;. Never mind that those same people are the ones who are paying the taxes that built those roads, they STILL didn&#039;t build it. 
I&#039;m not certain what it is that you believe you have accomplished here, but if you really do think that you have made a point, I&#039;m wasting my time because it&#039;s obvious that you don&#039;t understand what that means. Stop mocking and baiting if you can&#039;t argue factually. I understand that you have an opinion, but from what I can see, you believe that being part of the liberal &quot;me too&quot; crowd is the only evidence that you need. That being the case, go post on the New York Times website if you want affirmation of your importance in the world. I very much agree that profanity and name calling is not an argument, but neither is whatever tripe you believe you are peddling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What fact? All I&#8217;ve seen in your posts is mocking. I agree that the profanity is not a way to argue, but I have no idea what &#8220;fact&#8221; you want to debate. I&#8217;ve reviewed your posts and you haven&#8217;t made any point at all, other than to try to provoke an argument over word usage. Come up with something of substance, perhaps something factual. Just being liberal doesn&#8217;t win the day. The facts are not on your side, though.<br />
It always amazes me that liberals never want to look at history. We already have examples of socialism/wealth redistribution on a scale made large from many different countries, including the social experiments in the United States. The Great Society has utterly failed. We simply cannot spend past our ability to finance at a rate of  $1.6 trillion per year and expect that we can keep increasing how much we spend so that 1/2 of the country won&#8217;t have to pay taxes and will be able to draw on the common treasury.<br />
Obama stated in 2008 that, in three years, if the economy isn&#8217;t recovered, if the deficit isn&#8217;t halved, that the buck would stop with him. Has it? Every time he or Biden speak they whine about evil George W. Bush and how he caused all of this. They have nearly quadrupled the national debt in 3 years, does that count? Yet, it is still someone else&#8217;s fault. Their foreign policy is a shambles. The Middle East is on fire and his constant apologies have emboldened the terrorists and further destabilized the Middle East and Europe. And what is their new idea for the next 4 years? Continue doing the same thing. Increase spending, but we don&#8217;t have to worry about it. After all, only the 120,000 people in the US who make more than $8,000,000/yr are going to pay. Now that&#8217;s what I call fiscal responsibility! Heck, why not take every dime that those 120,000 people make? Excellent idea. If we are being generous, we might make it about 4-6 days. That is ALL of their income. Obama/Biden does not believe in the American dream, they think that anyone who has ingenuity and has become successful, pulling themselves and their family out of poverty have somehow stolen something from a fixed amount of limited resources. Really? Go ahead and take all of that away. Take every dime from those who make more than $250,000/yr. and the same results. By the way, those people did not gain that income in a vacuum. It largely comes from providing jobs and building successful businesses. But hey, since those businesses send their good to market on roads, they didn&#8217;t build their businesses and their success is NOT due to ingenuity and work ethic, it&#8217;s just an accident, making it A-OK to take their money and give it away to the &#8220;unlucky&#8221;. Never mind that those same people are the ones who are paying the taxes that built those roads, they STILL didn&#8217;t build it.<br />
I&#8217;m not certain what it is that you believe you have accomplished here, but if you really do think that you have made a point, I&#8217;m wasting my time because it&#8217;s obvious that you don&#8217;t understand what that means. Stop mocking and baiting if you can&#8217;t argue factually. I understand that you have an opinion, but from what I can see, you believe that being part of the liberal &#8220;me too&#8221; crowd is the only evidence that you need. That being the case, go post on the New York Times website if you want affirmation of your importance in the world. I very much agree that profanity and name calling is not an argument, but neither is whatever tripe you believe you are peddling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Driscoll</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/10/obama-in-trouble-as-america-begins-to-discover-the-real-mitt-romney/#comment-173007</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Driscoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38893#comment-173007</guid>
		<description>People have disliked my comment but no one seems to want to debate this fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People have disliked my comment but no one seems to want to debate this fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greywolfrs</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/10/obama-in-trouble-as-america-begins-to-discover-the-real-mitt-romney/#comment-172928</link>
		<dc:creator>greywolfrs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 03:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38893#comment-172928</guid>
		<description>I have anger issues? You deduced that by comments in a forum? Again, keep proving your stupidity, typical left wing moron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have anger issues? You deduced that by comments in a forum? Again, keep proving your stupidity, typical left wing moron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greywolfrs</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/10/10/obama-in-trouble-as-america-begins-to-discover-the-real-mitt-romney/#comment-172926</link>
		<dc:creator>greywolfrs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 03:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=38893#comment-172926</guid>
		<description>What does a degree in Constitutional law have to do with anything? Obamao doesn&#039;t follow the Constitution. Yeah, I do have an education, something you obviously lack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does a degree in Constitutional law have to do with anything? Obamao doesn&#8217;t follow the Constitution. Yeah, I do have an education, something you obviously lack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
