KEEP OBAMAO IN PRESIDENT, YOU KNOW!

Sorry, I couldn’t resist.

If you are a conservative, it’s exactly the opposite. Even if you have cold, hard, impartial, no nonsense facts in your arguments, even if you avoid calling liberals names, you are an enemy to all and they will call you names, key your cars, physically attack you, threaten you, your family, your church and your friends. After all, liberalism is the way of TOLERANCE.

Either they are all monumentally stupid or malignantly evil. I’m betting on the first choice. There are absolutely no facts that coincide with their claims. Because liberalism is the progeny of communism/socialism, they are also rabid proponents of “The end justifies the means.”

What does that mean? Simple. Look at the methodologies of liberalism as it applies to several liberal sacred cows. Take for example the following:

1. Compare the Tea Party rallies, the Restoring rallies, and other conservative events to the Occupy Wall Street rallies and the Wisconsin Scott Walker governor recall election. Occupy planned attacks on the police, incited violence, attacked and raped women, assaulted and murdered, destroyed property, peddled illegal drugs, looted, and defecated anywhere they chose. At the Tea Party rallies, and the Restoring events, the only arrests made were the liberals who were attacking those on the fringe of the crowd. Waste was picked up by the crowd and disposed of. Nobody defecated on property, no one was attacked, no drugs were sold, no media were assaulted, not one single woman (or man) was raped, no murders were committed. So…since liberals consider themselves TOLERANT, perhaps one of their members just couldn’t read the actual definition of that word, instead, personifying the meaning of the word HATE.
2. The gay movement. No longer are conservatives or moderates or liberals allowed to have a difference of opinion regarding homosexuality and special rights based on who a person chooses to have sex with. In fact, now, if you are a conservative, traditional Christian, you are guilty of a hate crime and worthy of death. After all, they are very tolerant people…so long as you agree 100% with them. Since the end justifies the means, blowing up churches, threatening individuals, ruthlessly attacking anyone who even professes faith in Jesus Christ (think Chick-fil-A’s Dan Kathy), are all courageous acts, not criminal behavior. Circumventing parents has now become one of their most effective weapons. According to the gay movement, because parents often do not agree with their quest for special privileges, now teachers and administrators routinely plot how to circumvent and marginalize parents and brainwash their children through the implementation of mandatory reeducation courses in which the gay lifestyle is celebrated, painted as desirable, and mocking the stupidity of their foolishly religious parents. Many of these programs emphasize to children that their parents’ morals are wrong because the very act of faith in God is discriminatory to atheists and gays. Because the parents are obviously wrong, it justifies turning classrooms into reeducation camps through mandatory attendance and ideological regurgitation WITHOUT allowing differing opinions or parental involvement.
3. Rick Santelli is right. Since historical and result based analyses sit in abject inversion to liberal dogma, it becomes necessary to do several things in order to swing things their way in elections
a. Attack any facts that show actual results of the implementation of liberal policy or historical communism/socialism. Results are irrelevant, ideology is paramount and sacred. Should someone present cold, hard fact (-ie- Mitt Romney pointing out that 47% of the population pays no taxes and in fact lives off the largess of the government through entitlement programs), attack, attack attack in order to try to obfuscate WHAT the person said in favor of HOW it was said. Again, it is paramount to always avoid being trapped into discussing issues in the light of indisputable fact. Should the attack fail, gather a mob and go on a rampage to garner support for your cause through the threat of violence. It’s more than okay….it’s for the “cause”.
b. Malign the character of anyone who does not believe as liberals do, whether it is true or not. If lies are necessary, then the bolder the lie, the more courageous the individual stating the lie. For example, Barack Obama’s statement that he had reduced the deficit by over 1 trillion dollars. Hey, he’s not lying. After all, he could have spent that trillion bucks, but instead, he decided to pay our soldiers to murder people, therefore, he has CUT the deficit, not added to it spectacularly.
c. If statistics do not agree with you, refer to 3b for creative methodologies. If that doesn’t work, then remove any portions of the statistical formula that reduces or removes the numbers that could unfavorably affect the outcome. For example, labor statistics. All presidents prior to Obama, when reporting job numbers and unemployment, included the variable of those who had become so discouraged that they had given up, recent college graduates, minors and differentiated between full time jobs vs. part time jobs. In the Obama presidency, those guys don’t count, newly frocked college graduates don’t count, minors don’t count, and there is no difference between part time and full time jobs. If the numbers were reported according to the traditional methodologies, we would have unemployment of around 18% and college grads would have unemployment of 50%, while minors would have unemployment upwards of 75%.
4. Liberals can’t be racist or held responsible for racist comments. It is literally impossible. If you are liberal, then you can say anything you want and it is completely acceptable. For example, Harry Reid stating that Obama wasn’t a dark enough Negro, even culturally. Even the Rev. Al Sharpton came rushing to his side to claim that he wasn’t racist. Mayor Ray Nagen of New Orleans, following Katrina, made the announcement that white property owners were no longer welcome in the devastated neighborhoods. He declared New Orleans a “black” city that would no longer tolerate whites, so they might as well just cut their losses and stay out. Joe Biden speaks before an all black audience and claims that Mitt Romney “wants ta’ put y’all back in chains.” Virtually nothing has been said about that by the MSM since. Meanwhile, the same day, Mitt Romney was attacked for being a racist. What did he say that set them off? Nothing…he’s a racist because he’s a white male. But hey, he’s got to be a racist because he once put a doggy car carrier on the roof of the car, thus proving he is evil, racist, anti-animal and discriminatory against females. Whoopi Goldberg, in interviewing Ann Colter about her new book, (NONE of the hosts on The View bothered to read the book prior to attacking Ann), told her that she was arrogant and stupid because, “Do YOU know what it’s like to be black?!!” See, if you’re black, you have to be a liberal and somehow, the color of your skin gives you a clairvoyant quality in which you know all of the individual experiences of every black person everywhere. Also, if you are white, you can’t talk about any issues that are important to blacks because you’re white…it’s a black thing. Also, being black means that you can talk about all issues pertaining to every race everywhere because your skin color qualifies you as an expert on all people everywhere, through all time. You’re white…you wouldn’t understand…it’s a black thing. That “crazy fun” Louis Farrakhan guy can’t be a racist…he’s black-racism is not possible because he’s black. All black people are oppressed as evidenced by Whoopi Goldberg because they are kept out of jobs where big money or power are offered. Just because she’s a millionaire many times over and Barack Obama is the most powerful man on earth is completely beside the point. You wouldn’t understand…it’s a black thing. Of course, because I am speaking about what a black woman said….I’m a racist. I wouldn’t understand…It’s a black thing. Refer back to the first sentence after Whoopi’s name is mentioned above for refresher clarification. Mitt Romney is a total racist again, because he wants to kill black people, especially black women and children because he doesn’t want to increase welfare. According to Whoopi, black people are incapable of success because of the racism of white people who aren’t giving them enough money. So what if we now have some families in the black community that are 12th generation lifelong welfare recipients with destroyed families. That’s not because welfare dependence rewards drug use, unwillingness to work, broken family structures, disease and crime, it’s because white people are racists and made them that way. After all, it is impossible for someone with black skin to succeed. The fact that those with the darkest skin, Haitians and Dominicans, have become as successful in this country as Asians (who happen to comprise a far smaller minority than blacks OR hispanics) is completely beside the point and proves that blacks can’t make it on their own because of white racism.
5. There is no such thing as hypocrisy when you’re a liberal. Most of #4 applies here, but when the end justifies the means, lying is not lying, it’s courageous. If you lie over and over and over again about what happened in Libya and you’re Obama, who is desperately trying to cover up his failure to do what his own security experts were begging him to do and in fact, took away security in an effort to show the Libyan forces that we have complete faith in their abilities and their loyalty, then you aren’t lying. It’s not hypocrisy, it’s courageous. I love it when a liberal writes something stupid and racist. It’s hilarious to watch the venom and hatred spew like actress Linda Blair in “The Exorcist” when her head was doing 360′s when I wait a few days, then quote them exactly – except I substitute out the colors and the political affiliations. See, it’s racist when I say it, but perfectly okay when THEY say it. Why? Because when you’re liberal, you absolutely, 100%, can NEVER, NEVER, NEVER be held responsible for anything you say.
6. If you’re conservative, then anything goes with the press, while any screwups by liberals result in one of several courses of action.
a. Attack the character of the person who is making the accusation
b. If the facts don’t agree with your thinking, ignore the whole thing and don’t mention it. If someone breaks down and doesn’t play along, resort to tactic a.
c. Edit, edit, edit. How many times has NBC been caught altering recordings in a way to make it look like whoever they are hating that day is a racist, hater pig who doesn’t deserve to live? Oh, I’m sorry NBC. Just because you get people killed because of your lies, you aren’t actually lying….you’re courageous. The MSM in this country hang their hats on the right to a free press, but they do everything in their power to mock the trust that’s given by becoming liberal cheerleaders and activists. I wonder how the press in Venezuela feels about the great hero of liberalism, Hugo Chavez. After all, he is the epitomy of what they are looking for. Nationalize everything, steal money to redistribute, etc. The fact that he has to ruthlessly suppress free speech and freedom of the press wouldn’t happen here, right? Of course not. THEY are in charge and the lying is only temporary until we arrive at the great future utopia in which the end and the means merge. Sigh….

I realize this is long-winded, but I’m tired of the lies, the attacks, the abject, profound and irredeemable lack of character on the left. To them, the constitution is to be despised except where it allows them to get their way. Religion is the enemy and good is evil and evil good.