Comments on: Crowder challenges union thug to MMA match http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/12/12/crowder-challenges-union-thug-to-mma-match/ The Fusion of Entertainment and Enlightenment Fri, 24 May 2013 13:00:00 -0400 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Sandie http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/12/12/crowder-challenges-union-thug-to-mma-match/#comment-201416 Sandie Mon, 17 Dec 2012 02:03:00 +0000 /?p=41275#comment-201416 Quoque u tu. You are no one to talk troll, the coward who hides behind Guest. You appoint yourself the to be Miss Manners of the Disqus realm? LMAO! Quoque u tu.

You are no one to talk troll, the coward who hides behind Guest. You appoint yourself the to be Miss Manners of the Disqus realm? LMAO!

]]> By: BentGhazi http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/12/12/crowder-challenges-union-thug-to-mma-match/#comment-201371 BentGhazi Sun, 16 Dec 2012 15:26:00 +0000 /?p=41275#comment-201371 It's OK, I figured it was something like that. It’s OK, I figured it was something like that.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/12/12/crowder-challenges-union-thug-to-mma-match/#comment-201366 Anonymous Sun, 16 Dec 2012 14:25:00 +0000 /?p=41275#comment-201366 TED, Absolutely, that scenario could have been LEGALLY stopped!   The Police had the Constitution on their side by way of "time, place and manner considerations."  The first amendment is NOT absolute.  There are many Supreme Court decisions that would have supported the cops stopping the Union's misguided beliefs in 1st amendment absolutism.  ("You can't shout fire in a crowded movie theater." Schenk v. United States, 1919) IF, the Cops,the DA, Mayor, etc., had wanted it stopped, the law was on their side.  All too often, and especially today, we find the law usurped by political ideology.  Just ask, our current Attorney General, Eric Holder?Perhaps if the powers that be, simply followed the law and founding principle rather than their emotional/political/religious inclinations, the law could be truly representative of "equal protection" and "due process?" Purveyor TED,

Absolutely, that scenario could have been LEGALLY stopped!  

The Police had the Constitution on their side by way of “time, place and manner considerations.”  The first amendment is NOT absolute.  There are many Supreme Court decisions that would have supported the cops stopping the Union’s misguided beliefs in 1st amendment absolutism.  (“You can’t shout fire in a crowded movie theater.” Schenk v. United States, 1919)

IF, the Cops,the DA, Mayor, etc., had wanted it stopped, the law was on their side.  All too often, and especially today, we find the law usurped by political ideology.  Just ask, our current Attorney General, Eric Holder?Perhaps if the powers that be, simply followed the law and founding principle rather than their emotional/political/religious inclinations, the law could be truly representative of “equal protection” and “due process?”

Purveyor

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/12/12/crowder-challenges-union-thug-to-mma-match/#comment-201337 Anonymous Sun, 16 Dec 2012 07:22:00 +0000 /?p=41275#comment-201337 That's why I addressed it to him. I know you're not him. When the responses come in by e-mail, they sometimes don't allow a direct response, so I went through the link that began with your note. Sorry. That’s why I addressed it to him. I know you’re not him. When the responses come in by e-mail, they sometimes don’t allow a direct response, so I went through the link that began with your note. Sorry.

]]> By: Sam Fisher http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/12/12/crowder-challenges-union-thug-to-mma-match/#comment-201278 Sam Fisher Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:20:00 +0000 /?p=41275#comment-201278 Stop deleting your post then I will stop calling you a coward. This is the last time I am talking to you if you don’t stop this stupid game of yours. Stop deleting your post then I will stop calling you a coward. This is the last time I am talking to you if you don’t stop this stupid game of yours.

]]> By: Guest http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/12/12/crowder-challenges-union-thug-to-mma-match/#comment-201274 Guest Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:48:00 +0000 /?p=41275#comment-201274  I just found it interesting you felt the need to discuss where the person you were discussing lived. What difference does it make one way or another? He is either correct or wrong so there is no reason to bring irrelevant speculation for the sole purpose of denigration, which he seems to be doing just fine on his own. If you do not believe it is irrelevant, then it becomes relevant to where you live.  Once again you speculate by calling me a coward for simply asking a question that you deem relevant to assume of others. As for being a coward, it seems you are the one who is afraid and incapable of engaging in a real dialogue.  I just found it interesting you felt the need to discuss where the person you were discussing lived. What difference does it make one way or another? He is either correct or wrong so there is no reason to bring irrelevant speculation for the sole purpose of denigration, which he seems to be doing just fine on his own. If you do not believe it is irrelevant, then it becomes relevant to where you live.

 Once again you speculate by calling me a coward for simply asking a question that you deem relevant to assume of others. As for being a coward, it seems you are the one who is afraid and incapable of engaging in a real dialogue.

]]> By: IMeMine http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/12/12/crowder-challenges-union-thug-to-mma-match/#comment-201273 IMeMine Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:47:00 +0000 /?p=41275#comment-201273  How do you know that is how "it is"? All you have done is pointed to another poster's bad behavior to try and justify your own, tu quoque. The poster you have been referring to is obviously suffering from cognitive issues and discredits himself just fine on his own so no response is required. It is not necessary and only makes a mess of the entire thread to sink down to their level. If you proceed down this path of fallacious reasoning then I have to ask, what separates you from that "no class troll"?  How do you know that is how “it is”?

All you have done is pointed to another poster’s bad behavior to try and justify your own, tu quoque. The poster you have been referring to is obviously suffering from cognitive issues and discredits himself just fine on his own so no response is required. It is not necessary and only makes a mess of the entire thread to sink down to their level.

If you proceed down this path of fallacious reasoning then I have to ask, what separates you from that “no class troll”?

]]> By: Desy Nurul Azkiya http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/12/12/crowder-challenges-union-thug-to-mma-match/#comment-201193 Desy Nurul Azkiya Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:56:00 +0000 /?p=41275#comment-201193 teroris  in  cover   stupid   police,teroris  in  cover teroris  in  cover   stupid   police,teroris  in  cover

]]> By: Desy Nurul Azkiya http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/12/12/crowder-challenges-union-thug-to-mma-match/#comment-201188 Desy Nurul Azkiya Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:45:00 +0000 /?p=41275#comment-201188 for  what  they  at  there?  they  only  new  baby  never  fill   fight  and  hurd   to  die!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  they   dont  know   and  dont  care   how  much   ill   :[ for  what  they  at  there?  they  only  new  baby  never  fill   fight  and  hurd   to  die!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  they   dont  know   and  dont  care   how  much   ill   :[

]]> By: Desy Nurul Azkiya http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/12/12/crowder-challenges-union-thug-to-mma-match/#comment-201184 Desy Nurul Azkiya Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:43:00 +0000 /?p=41275#comment-201184 the  truth   job  is  they  work  for  public,but  they  not  work  for  public   ? the  truth   job  is  they  work  for  public,but  they  not  work  for  public   ?

]]>