<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xml:base="http://www.glennbeck.com/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Armed off-duty guard stops middle school shooter, media silent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/01/armed-off-duty-guard-stops-middle-school-shooter-media-silent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/01/armed-off-duty-guard-stops-middle-school-shooter-media-silent/</link>
	<description>The Fusion of Entertainment and Enlightenment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:16:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: antithetical radical</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/01/armed-off-duty-guard-stops-middle-school-shooter-media-silent/#comment-216378</link>
		<dc:creator>antithetical radical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 02:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=42883#comment-216378</guid>
		<description>Killary is not going to win the nomination. The truth about her is going to come out well before the Democrat convention. 

I get my news and information from multiple sources, and like you I am a registered Republican, Tea Party candidates are constitutionalists who are forced to run in the Republican party, and they are the future of the  party. The old Rove era Republicans are on the way out and they are going to fight to the bitter end, but in the final analysis they are going to lose. 

I don&#039;t have to guess who is running in 2016, my energy will be expended dealing with the here and now at this point, and I will worry about 2016 when the time comes.  We have enough problems dealing with the current occupant of the people&#039;s house. Why don&#039;t we try to focus on that for now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Killary is not going to win the nomination. The truth about her is going to come out well before the Democrat convention. </p>
<p>I get my news and information from multiple sources, and like you I am a registered Republican, Tea Party candidates are constitutionalists who are forced to run in the Republican party, and they are the future of the  party. The old Rove era Republicans are on the way out and they are going to fight to the bitter end, but in the final analysis they are going to lose. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have to guess who is running in 2016, my energy will be expended dealing with the here and now at this point, and I will worry about 2016 when the time comes.  We have enough problems dealing with the current occupant of the people&#8217;s house. Why don&#8217;t we try to focus on that for now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/01/armed-off-duty-guard-stops-middle-school-shooter-media-silent/#comment-216255</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=42883#comment-216255</guid>
		<description>Get out of the bubble. Try getting your news from more than one source .I happen to be a Republican, I just don&#039;t follow a fanatic like they did in 1937 Germany. I don&#039;t agree with a lot of what the Democrats policies are, but lets look at real facts. The reason we lost the Election in 2008 to Obama was because of the legacy George Bush left us. History will show it was under his watch that America was attacked on our homeland.George Bush was the reason we have Obama.The reason we  lost in 2008 was because there was not one Republican who had balls enough to run against him so we ended up with 8 lunatics trying to get the nomination and the only one who got it was Mitt Romney who could not beat Obama even with the shitty job he did the past 4 years. What does that say about who we are as a party? We wll never win another Presidential election  in this decade. Who are we going to go with? I can tell you the Dems will have Hillary ,who are we going to put against her?  Michelle Bachman,, Newt, Herman Cain, Sarah Palin? There is no one in our party who has any chance to beat her do you know why? because all she has to do is not sound crazy and the country will vote for her. Do we have anyone who can run that won&#039;t sound crazy? I hope to god we find someone before 2016 but I doubt it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get out of the bubble. Try getting your news from more than one source .I happen to be a Republican, I just don&#8217;t follow a fanatic like they did in 1937 Germany. I don&#8217;t agree with a lot of what the Democrats policies are, but lets look at real facts. The reason we lost the Election in 2008 to Obama was because of the legacy George Bush left us. History will show it was under his watch that America was attacked on our homeland.George Bush was the reason we have Obama.The reason we  lost in 2008 was because there was not one Republican who had balls enough to run against him so we ended up with 8 lunatics trying to get the nomination and the only one who got it was Mitt Romney who could not beat Obama even with the shitty job he did the past 4 years. What does that say about who we are as a party? We wll never win another Presidential election  in this decade. Who are we going to go with? I can tell you the Dems will have Hillary ,who are we going to put against her?  Michelle Bachman,, Newt, Herman Cain, Sarah Palin? There is no one in our party who has any chance to beat her do you know why? because all she has to do is not sound crazy and the country will vote for her. Do we have anyone who can run that won&#8217;t sound crazy? I hope to god we find someone before 2016 but I doubt it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/01/armed-off-duty-guard-stops-middle-school-shooter-media-silent/#comment-215593</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=42883#comment-215593</guid>
		<description>Crickets.  Things like this drive progressives crazy.  They go into some sort of brain freeze because they are unable to process the information.  Divide by zero error.  Reset. Ctrl-Alt-Del.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crickets.  Things like this drive progressives crazy.  They go into some sort of brain freeze because they are unable to process the information.  Divide by zero error.  Reset. Ctrl-Alt-Del.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antithetical radical</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/01/armed-off-duty-guard-stops-middle-school-shooter-media-silent/#comment-215562</link>
		<dc:creator>antithetical radical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=42883#comment-215562</guid>
		<description>&quot;stupid americans &quot; don&#039;t know how to spell politician.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;stupid americans &#8221; don&#8217;t know how to spell politician.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antithetical radical</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/01/armed-off-duty-guard-stops-middle-school-shooter-media-silent/#comment-215561</link>
		<dc:creator>antithetical radical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=42883#comment-215561</guid>
		<description>LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! 
goober2013 is a big fat liar.

The worst fanatics are the ones who want to denigrate and destroy another man or woman&#039;s faith. Atheists and agnostics who are persecutors of people of faith are fearful cowards, and that is reality. Not all atheists and agnostics fit into the persecutor mold, many are fine with letting others believe what they want. No one has a problem with them. It&#039;s the aggressive in your face ones that are a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! <br />
goober2013 is a big fat liar.</p>
<p>The worst fanatics are the ones who want to denigrate and destroy another man or woman&#8217;s faith. Atheists and agnostics who are persecutors of people of faith are fearful cowards, and that is reality. Not all atheists and agnostics fit into the persecutor mold, many are fine with letting others believe what they want. No one has a problem with them. It&#8217;s the aggressive in your face ones that are a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antithetical radical</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/01/armed-off-duty-guard-stops-middle-school-shooter-media-silent/#comment-215557</link>
		<dc:creator>antithetical radical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=42883#comment-215557</guid>
		<description>LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! 
goober2013 is a big fat liar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! <br />
goober2013 is a big fat liar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antithetical radical</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/01/armed-off-duty-guard-stops-middle-school-shooter-media-silent/#comment-215559</link>
		<dc:creator>antithetical radical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=42883#comment-215559</guid>
		<description>LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! 
goober2013 is a big fat liar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! <br />
goober2013 is a big fat liar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antithetical radical</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/01/armed-off-duty-guard-stops-middle-school-shooter-media-silent/#comment-215555</link>
		<dc:creator>antithetical radical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=42883#comment-215555</guid>
		<description>LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! 
goober2013 is a big fat liar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! <br />
goober2013 is a big fat liar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antithetical radical</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/01/armed-off-duty-guard-stops-middle-school-shooter-media-silent/#comment-215556</link>
		<dc:creator>antithetical radical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=42883#comment-215556</guid>
		<description>LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! 
goober2013 is a big fat liar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! LIAR ALERT! <br />
goober2013 is a big fat liar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antithetical radical</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/01/armed-off-duty-guard-stops-middle-school-shooter-media-silent/#comment-215554</link>
		<dc:creator>antithetical radical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=42883#comment-215554</guid>
		<description>Beth, you missed the point. The fact the person who stopped the shooter WAS ARMED cause him to stop. You don&#039;t always have to shoot the bad guy to get the job done, sometimes presenting the weapon and demonstrating the wherewithal to use it is enough. The shooter was not a hardened criminal, and didn&#039;t want to take the chance of being shot. That armed citizen stopped the violence by being present with retaliatory capability. That&#039;s much more persuasive against this kind of shooter than an unarmed person would be.

You exercised your first amendment rights, please allow for the rest of us to do the same. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beth, you missed the point. The fact the person who stopped the shooter WAS ARMED cause him to stop. You don&#8217;t always have to shoot the bad guy to get the job done, sometimes presenting the weapon and demonstrating the wherewithal to use it is enough. The shooter was not a hardened criminal, and didn&#8217;t want to take the chance of being shot. That armed citizen stopped the violence by being present with retaliatory capability. That&#8217;s much more persuasive against this kind of shooter than an unarmed person would be.</p>
<p>You exercised your first amendment rights, please allow for the rest of us to do the same. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
