Comments on: WATCH: Hot Girl, Conservative Monologue http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/13/watch-hot-girl-conservative-monologue/ The Fusion of Entertainment and Enlightenment Sat, 25 May 2013 06:33:00 -0400 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: SoThere http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/13/watch-hot-girl-conservative-monologue/#comment-220867 SoThere Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:33:00 +0000 /?p=43440#comment-220867 Another vulgar Libtard puke. Another vulgar Libtard puke.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/13/watch-hot-girl-conservative-monologue/#comment-220776 Anonymous Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:53:00 +0000 /?p=43440#comment-220776 this is so fucking lame this is so fucking lame

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/13/watch-hot-girl-conservative-monologue/#comment-220770 Anonymous Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:59:00 +0000 /?p=43440#comment-220770 The projected reductions are small relative to the change in temperature (1.8 – 4.8 ºC) and sea level rise (27 – 51 cm) from 1990 to 2100 from the MAGICC simulations for the GCAM reference case. However, this is to be expected given the magnitude of emissions reductions expected from the program in the context of global emissions. This is also taken from the document sited pg 8-109 http://www.nhtsa.gov/search?q=hybrid fuel efficiency&spell=1&site=nhthqnlas187_Pages&client=default_frontend&output=xml_no_dtd&ie=UTF-8&access=p is the website for NHTSA or National Highway Traffic Safety Administration search : " hybrid fuel efficiency" open pdf entitles, "final Rulemaking to Establish Green house Gas Emissions" go to page 8-107 compare with http://www.nhtsa.gov/search?q=hybrid fuel efficiency&spell=1&site=nhthqnlas187_Pages&client=default_frontend&output=xml_no_dtd&ie=UTF-8&access=pWhich seems to suggest that the decress in emmisions under this program from now until then would result in the 'low' changes.What say you? The projected reductions are small relative to the change in temperature (1.8 – 4.8 ºC) and sea level rise (27 – 51 cm) from 1990 to 2100 from the MAGICC simulations for the GCAM reference case. However, this is to be expected given the magnitude of emissions reductions expected from the program in the context of global emissions. This is also taken from the document sited pg 8-109 http://www.nhtsa.gov/search?q=hybrid fuel efficiency&spell=1&site=nhthqnlas187_Pages&client=default_frontend&output=xml_no_dtd&ie=UTF-8&access=p

is the website for NHTSA or National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

search : ” hybrid fuel efficiency”

open pdf entitles, “final Rulemaking to Establish Green house Gas Emissions”

go to page 8-107

compare with http://www.nhtsa.gov/search?q=hybrid fuel efficiency&spell=1&site=nhthqnlas187_Pages&client=default_frontend&output=xml_no_dtd&ie=UTF-8&access=pWhich seems to suggest that the decress in emmisions under this program from now until then would result in the ‘low’ changes.What say you?

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/13/watch-hot-girl-conservative-monologue/#comment-220711 Anonymous Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:35:00 +0000 /?p=43440#comment-220711 Party like its 1985! lol Party like its 1985! lol

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/13/watch-hot-girl-conservative-monologue/#comment-219555 Anonymous Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:37:00 +0000 /?p=43440#comment-219555 Because they really DON'T save the planet ... yet.  Yes, we have been working on problem solvers for the last several decades, but haven't improved very much.  Yes, we need to continue to try to replace fossil fuels ... eventually, but not at the expense of the hard working tax payer. No, we are not contributing to global climate change (with the exception of liberals hot gasses).  Yes, our own Sun and Planet are the causes with solar heating, volcanoes, geothermal zones and wars/nuclear testing.  But, hey, we need to keep all of those PhD environmental scientist jobs so they won't be at the corner greasy spoon flipping burgers.  Besides, the progressives need this issue to be able to complete the takeover of the USA and world with their commie beliefs.  Just ask old George Soros and his minions. Because they really DON’T save the planet … yet.  Yes, we have been working on problem solvers for the last several decades, but haven’t improved very much.  Yes, we need to continue to try to replace fossil fuels … eventually, but not at the expense of the hard working tax payer. No, we are not contributing to global climate change (with the exception of liberals hot gasses).  Yes, our own Sun and Planet are the causes with solar heating, volcanoes, geothermal zones and wars/nuclear testing.  But, hey, we need to keep all of those PhD environmental scientist jobs so they won’t be at the corner greasy spoon flipping burgers.  Besides, the progressives need this issue to be able to complete the takeover of the USA and world with their commie beliefs.  Just ask old George Soros and his minions.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/13/watch-hot-girl-conservative-monologue/#comment-219556 Anonymous Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:37:00 +0000 /?p=43440#comment-219556 Because they really DON'T save the planet ... yet.  Yes, we have been working on problem solvers for the last several decades, but haven't improved very much.  Yes, we need to continue to try to replace fossil fuels ... eventually, but not at the expense of the hard working tax payer. No, we are not contributing to global climate change (with the exception of liberals hot gasses).  Yes, our own Sun and Planet are the causes with solar heating, volcanoes, geothermal zones and wars/nuclear testing.  But, hey, we need to keep all of those PhD environmental scientist jobs so they won't be at the corner greasy spoon flipping burgers.  Besides, the progressives need this issue to be able to complete the takeover of the USA and world with their commie beliefs.  Just ask old George Soros and his minions. Because they really DON’T save the planet … yet.  Yes, we have been working on problem solvers for the last several decades, but haven’t improved very much.  Yes, we need to continue to try to replace fossil fuels … eventually, but not at the expense of the hard working tax payer. No, we are not contributing to global climate change (with the exception of liberals hot gasses).  Yes, our own Sun and Planet are the causes with solar heating, volcanoes, geothermal zones and wars/nuclear testing.  But, hey, we need to keep all of those PhD environmental scientist jobs so they won’t be at the corner greasy spoon flipping burgers.  Besides, the progressives need this issue to be able to complete the takeover of the USA and world with their commie beliefs.  Just ask old George Soros and his minions.

]]> By: Constance Spangler http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/13/watch-hot-girl-conservative-monologue/#comment-219510 Constance Spangler Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:47:00 +0000 /?p=43440#comment-219510 Very very nice girl--. Very very nice girl–.

]]> By: David Fried http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/13/watch-hot-girl-conservative-monologue/#comment-219490 David Fried Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:05:00 +0000 /?p=43440#comment-219490 why would you rant against more eco-friendly cars? What kind of person takes an impassioned stand against vehicles trying to conserve the environment?! why would you rant against more eco-friendly cars? What kind of person takes an impassioned stand against vehicles trying to conserve the environment?!

]]> By: David Fried http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/13/watch-hot-girl-conservative-monologue/#comment-219491 David Fried Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:05:00 +0000 /?p=43440#comment-219491 why would you rant against more eco-friendly cars? What kind of person takes an impassioned stand against vehicles trying to conserve the environment?! why would you rant against more eco-friendly cars? What kind of person takes an impassioned stand against vehicles trying to conserve the environment?!

]]> By: Papa Smurf 5069 http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/02/13/watch-hot-girl-conservative-monologue/#comment-219481 Papa Smurf 5069 Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:05:00 +0000 /?p=43440#comment-219481 Get this on You tube and all of the other new media sites that the ignorant Obamacolytes love.  this  should go "viral" and be followed up by a series of short (bear in mind the limited attention span of your target audience) clips.  Another suggestion: scroll links to websites documenting the factuality of the statements made by the babe.  Yet another suggestion: Do a version of these with a barechested macho man for the low-information female voters. Get this on You tube and all of the other new media sites that the ignorant Obamacolytes love.  this  should go “viral” and be followed up by a series of short (bear in mind the limited attention span of your target audience) clips.  Another suggestion: scroll links to websites documenting the factuality of the statements made by the babe.  Yet another suggestion: Do a version of these with a barechested macho man for the low-information female voters.

]]>