<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xml:base="http://www.glennbeck.com/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Democrats want to keep African Americans &#8216;unarmed, uneducated and dependent&#8217;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/03/13/do-democrats-want-to-keep-african-americans-unarmed-uneducated-and-dependent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/03/13/do-democrats-want-to-keep-african-americans-unarmed-uneducated-and-dependent/</link>
	<description>The Fusion of Entertainment and Enlightenment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:52:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/03/13/do-democrats-want-to-keep-african-americans-unarmed-uneducated-and-dependent/#comment-231391</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=44558#comment-231391</guid>
		<description> To both landofaahs and bert 28. You are both a little right. Slavery would have ended of its own but it would have taken a long time. First of all the main cause of the Civil War was not slavery as it existed in the Southern States but the expansion of Slavery into the new Territories.  If the South won or if the war never happened and the South got its way Slavery would have expanded which would have meant a resumption of the African slave trade to fill the increased need. This is proven by existing historical records that show plainly that the South wanted a resumption for this reason.  Within a few years the new Territories would have exploded with slaves probably doubling or tripling the slave population of the United States. But, after a few years in the &quot;frontier&quot; the slave / master relationship would have been very different from that in the institutionalized South. Slaves would have likely become to be seen more as indentured servants or bondsmen than as chattel. The wild card would have been how this presence of so many slaves would have impacted the relationship between Natives and Settlers. In some cases Natives actually held slaves and would have likely added more and over time merged more with the settlers. But others would have absorbed escaped slaves into heir numbers making it much, much harder for US forces to remove them.

Either way the slave trade from Africa would have resumed and this may have meant a resumed war with Great Brittan, whose Navy was active against the slave trade and would have come into contact with US slave ships. Slave population would explode and spread and then over a few years it would diminish with slaves simply becoming less defined as slaves until slavery itself evolved out of existence. No lives would have been saved because the Civil War Dead would have been replaced with either the dead from new slaves or the dead from other battlefields.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> To both landofaahs and bert 28. You are both a little right. Slavery would have ended of its own but it would have taken a long time. First of all the main cause of the Civil War was not slavery as it existed in the Southern States but the expansion of Slavery into the new Territories.  If the South won or if the war never happened and the South got its way Slavery would have expanded which would have meant a resumption of the African slave trade to fill the increased need. This is proven by existing historical records that show plainly that the South wanted a resumption for this reason.  Within a few years the new Territories would have exploded with slaves probably doubling or tripling the slave population of the United States. But, after a few years in the &#8220;frontier&#8221; the slave / master relationship would have been very different from that in the institutionalized South. Slaves would have likely become to be seen more as indentured servants or bondsmen than as chattel. The wild card would have been how this presence of so many slaves would have impacted the relationship between Natives and Settlers. In some cases Natives actually held slaves and would have likely added more and over time merged more with the settlers. But others would have absorbed escaped slaves into heir numbers making it much, much harder for US forces to remove them.</p>
<p>Either way the slave trade from Africa would have resumed and this may have meant a resumed war with Great Brittan, whose Navy was active against the slave trade and would have come into contact with US slave ships. Slave population would explode and spread and then over a few years it would diminish with slaves simply becoming less defined as slaves until slavery itself evolved out of existence. No lives would have been saved because the Civil War Dead would have been replaced with either the dead from new slaves or the dead from other battlefields.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/03/13/do-democrats-want-to-keep-african-americans-unarmed-uneducated-and-dependent/#comment-230078</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 08:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=44558#comment-230078</guid>
		<description>The winner of the war writes or re writes their version of history. The WAR OF NOTHERN  AGRESSION has been rewritten to produce the results of the history we have today. The War was fought over Tariffs. The issue of Slavery was used by the North as a rallying point not the cause of the war. Grant was a drunk and later a terrible President. Lincoln went through several generals before he settled on Grant. Lincoln didn&#039;t have a problem with slavery(Politically), but was forced by politics to save his party by complying with the wishes of those backing him. The Emancipation Proclomation only freed those slaves in the States held by the Confederacy not the entire county. Blacks were still mistreated, kept in a virtual slave condition and kept separate(segreated) from whites in the North. (Even Black officers that served in the Union Army)  During the war,there were horrible, infamous unbeliveably atrocious POW camps on both sides where thousands of men died from disease and brutal living conditions. Those that survived and were released-- especially Confederates went home to devistaton,poverty and a bleak future.
  Read about the Morrill Tariff as well as the 1828 Tariff of Abomination.
Read the book The Un-Civil war : Shattering the Historical Myths by Leonard M.Scruggs. published in 2011.
&quot; The real causes of the disatisfaction in the South with the North are in the unjust taxation and expenditure of the taxes by the Government of the United Sates and in the revolution the North has effected in this government,from a confederated republic to a national dspotism&quot;  This was published two days before Lincoln&#039;s election in November 1860 in
 the Charleston Mercury. In 1861 an article in a newspaper in London written by a political analyst favoring the North wrote&quot; The war between the North and South is a tariff war. The war, is futher,not for any principle,does not touch the question of slavery and in fact turns on the Nothern lust for power.&quot; 
&quot;The exclusionist policy of the Republican party was not to abolish slavery,but only to keep slavery out of the new territorites. A majority of republicans wanted to exclude blacks altogether from these terrorities and reserve them for &quot;free white labor&quot; .  which was suggested by both David Wilmont and Abraham Lincoln .&quot;  from &quot; The Morrill Tariff -Northern Provacation to Southern Secession November/December 2011 issue of the Confederate Veteran. The 600,000 Union and condederate soliders that died as well as 50,000 Southern civilians died as a result of years of unjust Northern tariffs ,taxes and protectionism--not because of slavery. The war was fought over &quot;Money&quot; In 1862 the South was responsible for 82 % of all exports from the United States. The North was losing money because of the Souterhn &quot;cotton&quot; states. By placing more and more of a tax burden and tariffs they attempted to control the money flow and thus the &#039;&#039;Power&quot; of the government.
  For years, primarily since the 1960&#039;s the myth that the war was a glorious crusade against slavery has been nothing more than propaganda by political interests that want their version of the war continued in the schools and halls of academia. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The winner of the war writes or re writes their version of history. The WAR OF NOTHERN  AGRESSION has been rewritten to produce the results of the history we have today. The War was fought over Tariffs. The issue of Slavery was used by the North as a rallying point not the cause of the war. Grant was a drunk and later a terrible President. Lincoln went through several generals before he settled on Grant. Lincoln didn&#8217;t have a problem with slavery(Politically), but was forced by politics to save his party by complying with the wishes of those backing him. The Emancipation Proclomation only freed those slaves in the States held by the Confederacy not the entire county. Blacks were still mistreated, kept in a virtual slave condition and kept separate(segreated) from whites in the North. (Even Black officers that served in the Union Army)  During the war,there were horrible, infamous unbeliveably atrocious POW camps on both sides where thousands of men died from disease and brutal living conditions. Those that survived and were released&#8211; especially Confederates went home to devistaton,poverty and a bleak future.<br />
  Read about the Morrill Tariff as well as the 1828 Tariff of Abomination.<br />
Read the book The Un-Civil war : Shattering the Historical Myths by Leonard M.Scruggs. published in 2011.<br />
&#8221; The real causes of the disatisfaction in the South with the North are in the unjust taxation and expenditure of the taxes by the Government of the United Sates and in the revolution the North has effected in this government,from a confederated republic to a national dspotism&#8221;  This was published two days before Lincoln&#8217;s election in November 1860 in<br />
 the Charleston Mercury. In 1861 an article in a newspaper in London written by a political analyst favoring the North wrote&#8221; The war between the North and South is a tariff war. The war, is futher,not for any principle,does not touch the question of slavery and in fact turns on the Nothern lust for power.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;The exclusionist policy of the Republican party was not to abolish slavery,but only to keep slavery out of the new territorites. A majority of republicans wanted to exclude blacks altogether from these terrorities and reserve them for &#8220;free white labor&#8221; .  which was suggested by both David Wilmont and Abraham Lincoln .&#8221;  from &#8221; The Morrill Tariff -Northern Provacation to Southern Secession November/December 2011 issue of the Confederate Veteran. The 600,000 Union and condederate soliders that died as well as 50,000 Southern civilians died as a result of years of unjust Northern tariffs ,taxes and protectionism&#8211;not because of slavery. The war was fought over &#8220;Money&#8221; In 1862 the South was responsible for 82 % of all exports from the United States. The North was losing money because of the Souterhn &#8220;cotton&#8221; states. By placing more and more of a tax burden and tariffs they attempted to control the money flow and thus the &#8221;Power&#8221; of the government.<br />
  For years, primarily since the 1960&#8242;s the myth that the war was a glorious crusade against slavery has been nothing more than propaganda by political interests that want their version of the war continued in the schools and halls of academia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/03/13/do-democrats-want-to-keep-african-americans-unarmed-uneducated-and-dependent/#comment-230076</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 07:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=44558#comment-230076</guid>
		<description>When you do the background research on Pres. Lydon Johnson, Pres. JFK and the Kennedy family, The Clintons and several other political democratic noteables you find out how much they truly disliked Blacks,but did everything they could in public to get their vote. You have to dig in their dairies, private lives, family gatherings,business dealings, remarks made to body guards,etc . The evidence is there,but you have to go beyond just news articles,TV comments, ----- each President has a library, there are congressional papers with info on their daily meetings with aids,staffers, etc. 
Blacks have been used by the Democrats for generations to keep them in office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you do the background research on Pres. Lydon Johnson, Pres. JFK and the Kennedy family, The Clintons and several other political democratic noteables you find out how much they truly disliked Blacks,but did everything they could in public to get their vote. You have to dig in their dairies, private lives, family gatherings,business dealings, remarks made to body guards,etc . The evidence is there,but you have to go beyond just news articles,TV comments, &#8212;&#8211; each President has a library, there are congressional papers with info on their daily meetings with aids,staffers, etc.<br />
Blacks have been used by the Democrats for generations to keep them in office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beverly Cain</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/03/13/do-democrats-want-to-keep-african-americans-unarmed-uneducated-and-dependent/#comment-230068</link>
		<dc:creator>Beverly Cain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=44558#comment-230068</guid>
		<description>I believe this is the first time I&#039;ve seen Starr Parker associated with Glenn or The Blaze. Fabulous woman. As a Long Beach resident - this made my day to see her on the show. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe this is the first time I&#8217;ve seen Starr Parker associated with Glenn or The Blaze. Fabulous woman. As a Long Beach resident &#8211; this made my day to see her on the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/03/13/do-democrats-want-to-keep-african-americans-unarmed-uneducated-and-dependent/#comment-229837</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=44558#comment-229837</guid>
		<description>I voted for Romney, so you are uninformed about me.  You&#039;ve shown your contempt for Abraham Lincoln.  Good for you hater. Hate me hate me all you want I DON&#039;T CARE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I voted for Romney, so you are uninformed about me.  You&#8217;ve shown your contempt for Abraham Lincoln.  Good for you hater. Hate me hate me all you want I DON&#8217;T CARE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Draxx</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/03/13/do-democrats-want-to-keep-african-americans-unarmed-uneducated-and-dependent/#comment-229651</link>
		<dc:creator>Draxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 05:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=44558#comment-229651</guid>
		<description>Over 20,000 POW&#039;s of the Civil War died in the Harrisburg Prison Camp... How many lived I am not sure but there definitely were POW&#039;s!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over 20,000 POW&#8217;s of the Civil War died in the Harrisburg Prison Camp&#8230; How many lived I am not sure but there definitely were POW&#8217;s!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/03/13/do-democrats-want-to-keep-african-americans-unarmed-uneducated-and-dependent/#comment-229610</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 02:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=44558#comment-229610</guid>
		<description>Sounds like the Democrats are doing that and it&#039;s important for African Americans to get educated and learn the truth.Because these politicians on the left don&#039;t want to help you,they want to leave you defenseless and hopeless.That&#039;s stupid.I hope and pray everyone wakes up to their plot to hurt the African American community&#039;s as well as others. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like the Democrats are doing that and it&#8217;s important for African Americans to get educated and learn the truth.Because these politicians on the left don&#8217;t want to help you,they want to leave you defenseless and hopeless.That&#8217;s stupid.I hope and pray everyone wakes up to their plot to hurt the African American community&#8217;s as well as others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mspatdev</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/03/13/do-democrats-want-to-keep-african-americans-unarmed-uneducated-and-dependent/#comment-229595</link>
		<dc:creator>mspatdev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 01:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=44558#comment-229595</guid>
		<description>The answer to this question is YES. Obammy won by keeping the blacks down and giving them free phones, free mortgages and keeping them on welfare, food stamps and everything else. He calls them stupid, they aren&#039;t. The youth are the most unemployed in the nation. When are people going to get up and rise up? Martin L. King did not die for Obammy to come along and put you down. I grew up in Calif. with the blacks. They were good people. My ancestors fought for you by saving the people coming from the south to the north. Get out of the thinking that you can&#039;t do it, YOU Can do it.  May God Bless This Great Nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer to this question is YES. Obammy won by keeping the blacks down and giving them free phones, free mortgages and keeping them on welfare, food stamps and everything else. He calls them stupid, they aren&#8217;t. The youth are the most unemployed in the nation. When are people going to get up and rise up? Martin L. King did not die for Obammy to come along and put you down. I grew up in Calif. with the blacks. They were good people. My ancestors fought for you by saving the people coming from the south to the north. Get out of the thinking that you can&#8217;t do it, YOU Can do it.  May God Bless This Great Nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/03/13/do-democrats-want-to-keep-african-americans-unarmed-uneducated-and-dependent/#comment-229565</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=44558#comment-229565</guid>
		<description>

Anyone
who thinks ending slavery was a good idea should take a walk though Chicago or Detroit.
Or any other cities like Memphis with a large black population. Anyone who
thinks race (not color) does not make a difference is dumber than the average
low information voter. The only semi successful countries on this planet are Asian.
There are no successful brown or black counties that do not depend on white
charity in some fashion. Oh there are millions of excuses for it and of course
there are exceptions within the races but when looked at overall equality is
total fantasy.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone<br />
who thinks ending slavery was a good idea should take a walk though Chicago or Detroit.<br />
Or any other cities like Memphis with a large black population. Anyone who<br />
thinks race (not color) does not make a difference is dumber than the average<br />
low information voter. The only semi successful countries on this planet are Asian.<br />
There are no successful brown or black counties that do not depend on white<br />
charity in some fashion. Oh there are millions of excuses for it and of course<br />
there are exceptions within the races but when looked at overall equality is<br />
total fantasy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/03/13/do-democrats-want-to-keep-african-americans-unarmed-uneducated-and-dependent/#comment-229559</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=44558#comment-229559</guid>
		<description> If you can explain how Chicago, Detroit and Memphis is now awesome I will sell you the Brooklyn Bridge.  Preface your  statement there would be slavery in the South to this day with in my opinion, because that is all it is and a stupid one at that.  Your posts is just another example of our dumbed down proproganda school system, an example of the misinformed and uninformed that votes in our elections for the worse Preseident we could possibly have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> If you can explain how Chicago, Detroit and Memphis is now awesome I will sell you the Brooklyn Bridge.  Preface your  statement there would be slavery in the South to this day with in my opinion, because that is all it is and a stupid one at that.  Your posts is just another example of our dumbed down proproganda school system, an example of the misinformed and uninformed that votes in our elections for the worse Preseident we could possibly have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
