| RELATED STORY
Ocean Cooling to Briefly Halt Global Warming, Researchers Say
Glenn: I mean, there’s just ‑‑ there’s absolutely no common sense, but why would there be? In a world where this could be the actual headline, I don’t know who saw this on Drudge last night, ocean cooling to briefly help global warming. This is one of the most amazing stories I have ever read in my life. You know, I told you before I have a big box of things that I’m saving for my children, the history as it has happened as I have seen it, and what happens is I take the newspapers every day and I go and I say, if I see something that’s important or a letter that comes in or whatever and I put it in the box and I’ll write a little note or whatever and I save it and then someday, after I’m long gone, they can go through it on the throw it out or they can just look through and have some laughs on, Dad was crazy, wasn’t he?
This one is getting a special ‑‑ I’m going to put this one in a Ziploc bag, just to make sure this one’s not too brittle when they actually read it. April 30th, parts of North America and Europe may naturally cool over the next decade. What? It may naturally cool? I thought the earth we had screwed up its thermostat. As shifting ocean currents temporarily blunt the global warming effect caused by mankind. Average temperatures in areas such as California and France may drop over the next 10 years.
You know, out of all the places where the temperature should drop, it shouldn’t be California and France. This is going to be influenced by colder flows in the north Atlantic, this according to a report today in the institution based in Keel, Germany. Temperatures worldwide may stabilize over the next 10 years. The study was based on sea surface currents that move around the world and vary from decade to decade. This regional cooling effect my temporarily neutral eyes the long‑term warming phenomena that caused by heat trapping greenhouse gases building up and the earth. Those national climate variations could be stronger than the global warming trend over the next 10 years period. Without knowing that, you might erroneously think that there is no global warming going on.
Hang on just a second. The natural climate variations could be stronger than the global warming trend?
Stu: Wait, now. Glenn. You misread that because the science is settled and the natural variations aren’t going to factor in. It’s just going to warm‑up ‑‑
Glenn: No. I have it here. This is from the research scientists at the Met Office Hadley Centre in UK.
Stu: No, no. I understand what you’re saying. I know the sources, but what I’m saying is that when ‑‑ natural variations have nothing to do with it. Demands COT closes the globe to warm and it will continue to warm for the next ‑‑
Glenn: No. This is ‑‑ that was the accepted science.
Stu: It was the consensus was settled. There is no immediate to look at it anymore.
Glenn: This is and this is now settled.
Stu: It was settled yesterday.
Glenn: No ‑‑ yeah. This came out yesterday.
Stu: But it was settled. It wouldn’t change. So, yesterday’s would be the same as today.
Glenn: Stu, Stu, they were wrong the day before yesterday, but they’re not right yesterday. The day before yesterday.
Glenn: All right?
Glenn: They were wrong. So, the science is settled. These are natural climate variations that are going to be stronger than the global warming trend, just for the next 10 years.
Stu: But wait a minute. There hasn’t been any scientists out there. They don’t exist, who have been saying natural climate is really the force out there.
Glenn: They do, but those are the people ‑‑ we never landed on the moon. Those people said that natural variations might affect this.
Stu: You’re saying there were scientists saying this the entire time.
Glenn: Those were cooks.
Stu: But you’re saying it’s right and it’s settled today.
Glenn: They’re still cooks.
Stu: How are they cooks ‑‑
Glenn: Excuse me. Excuse me. Stop questioning science. Stu, have you read the IPCC report?
Stu: I’ve read ‑‑
Glenn: Have you read the report?
Stu: Well, I haven’t ‑‑
Glenn: I think we have our answer there. No need to listen to him. If we don’t experience warming over the next 10 years, that doesn’t mean that the greenhouse gas warming is not with us. It’s just cooling and not warming, but the greenhouse warming will still be with us.
Stu: So, if we didn’t have greenhouse warming, it would be getting much cooler right now? So, you’re saying that right now we’re being saved by big oil?
Glenn: Long‑term climate changes in the north Atlantic religion affect the hurricane activity in the Atlantic. Excuse me. Don’t we have a consensus now that hurricanes are not caused by global warming? Didn’t that just come out, as well? Because they were trying to explain away why the hurricanes haven’t been getting worse?
Stu: Oh, no. That’s still the consensus. That’s still the scientific consensus. Again, the hurricanes have been just taking a break for the past few years.
Glenn: Right. This would mean that the .3‑degree Celsius global average temperature rise which has been predicted for the next decade by the enter governmental panel on climate change may not happen. This according to the Science Journal Nature. It may not happen. However, it will just pick right back up in about 10 years. The effect of rising fossil fuel emissions will meet that warming will accelerate again after 2015, when the natural trends in the oceans veer back towards warming, according to the computer models. So, their computer models never predicted this but don’t worry. Their computer models predict that after 10 years the computer models will be right.