Glenn interviews 2012 contender Rick Santorum

Rick Santorum threw his name onto the GOP contender list earlier this week, and Glenn interviewed the former Senator on radio this morning.

While introducing Santorum, Glenn said that the potential candidate was on a short list of people that in his mind would be good choices for President in 2012. “ I think he is one of the bravest men out there,” Glenn said.

After listening to the remarks the President about entitlements are what makes America great, Santorum said, “In 2008 America was looking for a President that they could believe in and after experiencing Barack Obama, America that realized that they need a President that believes in them.”

“ I always say that in America we are different and I talk about my grandfather coming to this country, you know, leaving Mussolini's Italy, leaving a good job, leaving security, leaving stability because he wanted freedom more than anything else and the DNA of Americans is different. We value freedom more than anything else and the people that are running this country now don't. They value control and security and this dependency,” he added.

Surprisingly, Glenn played Allen Simpson remarks about Santorum and asked for a response. Simpson had recently said, “We have homophobes in our party. That's disgusting to me. We're all human beings. We're all God's children. Now, if they're going to get off in that stuff -- Santorum has said some cruel things, cruel, cruel things about homosexuals. Ask him about it. See if he agrees to the cruelness of his remarks, years ago. Foul.”

Santorum’s response? “There were no cruel, cruel remarks. All I can ponder is that Allen Simpson is talking about a comment that I made which I paraphrase almost word for word, but paraphrase a Supreme Court Justice on a case calls Lawrence versus Texas, before that case came out which had to do with, as you know, a Supreme Court case on the issue of sodomy and I said that if you have -- if the Supreme Court case is the legal standard to say that consensual sexual activity is now a Constitutional right, then we open up the gates for all sorts of consensual acts.”

Santorum continued, “And unfortunately folks like Allen Simpson saw that as homophobic. It's not homophobic. It's a legal argument. In fact, that's exactly what's happening. We went from Lawrence versus Texas to now a Constitutional right to same sex marriage and they're going into a Constitutional right to polyamorous relationships. This is the slippery slope that we're heading down.”

Glenn also asked Santorum about his views on the Middle East chaos and the debt ceiling. Santorum agreed with many of Glenn’s theories on what could happen in the Middle East in the coming months and years, including a caliphate made up of Turkey, Egypt, and Iran. “I've been writing about it for the last four years and as you know, because I was on your program in 2006, I was talking about those exact same things,” Santorum said.

“I was considered, well, like you are just suggesting, crazy for suggesting that I talk about Hugo Chavez, I talked about the relationship between Venezuela and Iran. I talked about jihadist training camps in central and South America. That is all factually correct. That is, in fact, going on. There is no question that there are elements in the Middle East that would like to establish a caliphate and that, yes, Sunni and Shia are working together. Socialists and Islamists and jihadists are working together,” Santorum added.

“Barack Obama's favorability ratings in the country of Israel is in single digits. So, the people in Israel believe that we've changed allegiances but unfortunately, as you know, Glenn, it's not just Israel. It's anybody that's a friend of the United States we turn our back to routinely,” he said.

“The debt ceiling. Do we vote to extend the debt ceiling?” Glenn asked.

“The only reason you vote to extend the debt ceiling is you get substantial concessions out of this administration on programs that have a meaningful change in the reduction of the deficit and to me, first and foremost, would be Obamacare. I think we have to draw a line,” Santorum said.

Glenn responded, “If you don't pass the debt ceiling, if you don't lift it, the country, the whole world, can go into a tailspin. Do you not believe that or do you think that it's best to do that? “

“Well, first, there's certainly things you can do in passing legislation to actually make that our debts are paid and that what suffers is government programs in the sense of instead of having our credit worthiness affected, what you do is you affect the operations of government instead of our ability to pay our debt. There's still money coming in, enough money coming in to pay our debits if we prioritize how we use those expenditures and so I don't buy off on this, you know, we're going to fall off a cliff. We're going to fall off a cliff if we don't start doing something to deal with this debt and this is an opportunity for us to draw the line in the sand and put their backs to the wall on something that they really want.”

Full Transcript of Interviews Below:

GLENN: Senator Rick Santorum announced that he is taking the next step in a possible run for President in 2012.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: Rick Santorum is, I believe, Pat's candidate. He said he's going to vote for Rick Santorum if he runs.

PAT: Uh-huh, uh-huh.

GLENN: I think Rick is on a very short list of about three people for me. I think he is one of the bravest men out there. He said damn the torpedoes in his last election. I'm going to say what is true and they said that's going to kill you in the polls and it did and he said I don't care.

PAT: I don't think Rick said the D word. I don't think he said that. I don't think he would swear that way.

GLENN: He also is -- he is very outspoken on issues of life and what has been happening in the Middle East. He's one of the very few that have gotten this from the very beginning. Welcome to the program, Rick Santorum. How are you, sir?

SANTORUM: I am doing great. Thank you and I appreciate the compliments and the endorsements and I would say "damn" because it's a historical quote.

Glenn: Okay. All right. Let me give the -- let me give you a couple of thing. First I want to start with the President's speech yesterday and I want you to listen to this, especially the last line where he talks about a great country. I don't know if you've picked this up yet, but I would like to hear your comments. Listen to what he's saying about all of these programs and what it means about our country.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: We recognize that no matter how responsible MRI we live our lives, hard times or bad luck, a crippling illness or a layoff may strike any one of us. There but for the grace of God go I, we say to ourselves. And so we contribute to programs like Medicaid and Social Security which guarantee us healthcare and a measure of basic income after a lifetime of hard work. Unemployment insurance which protects us against unexpected job loss and Medicaid which provides care for millions of seniors in nursing homes, poor children, those with disabilities.

GLENN: Listen to this.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: We're a better country because of these commitments. I'll go further. We would not be a great country without those commitments.

SANTORUM: So, prior to 1965 America was not a great country?

PAT: Had you, uh-huh,

SANTORUM: There you go. That kind of sums it up right there, doesn't it?

GLENN: It does.

SANTORUM: I said something when I announced last night and to me this sort of sums up what we've been through these last couple of years. I said, you know, in 2008 America was looking for a President that they could believe in and after experiencing Barack Obama, America that realized that they need a President that believes in them.

GLENN: Can I -- Rick, can I tell you something? This was in the Huffington Post where they're trying to convince Hillary Clinton to run in 2012 and I wanted to bring up your phrase that you said last night because listen to what the Huffington Post said. For Democrats it's no longer change we can believe in but a candidate we can believe in. Again, it's the exact opposite.

SANTORUM: It's the exact -- they're looking for -- this is -- you say this all the time, Glenn, but it really is looking for someone to be the paternalistic -- here's a bunch of folks that fought against the paternalistic system in America and that's what they're looking for. They're looking for the savior, they're looking for the king. I always say that in America we are different and I talk about my grandfather coming to this country, you know, leaving Mussolini's Italy, leaving a good job, leaving security, leaving stability because he wanted freedom more than anything else and the DNA of Americans is different. We value freedom more than anything else and the people that are running this country now don't. They value control and security and this dependency and it is -- it is the fundamental question of our time, are we a society, are we a society that's going to go back to the principles that made this country the greatest country in the history of the world which is simply this, that America, the whole purpose of America, is for you to be free to pursue your dreams. That is -- it's not to create a great government, it's not to create a great economy, it's not to create anything except the ability for you to provide for yourself and the people that you love and to serve the God that you love. Those -- that's what America is all about and we trust people to do that and when people do that, America, the whole society, becomes a great society.

GLENN: All right. So, let me -- and I've never said this phrase before and meant it literally and I feel like I do now every time I say it. Let me play devil's advocate and say, well, a lot of people can't live their dream because the wealthiest 1% have all of the money, they control the money, they are getting richer and richer and let's even -- let's even let the chips fall where they may. The banks and the government and the Fed are going to inflate our money. They're not going to be able to get ahead while the rich, like George Soros or the Coke brothers, are able to continue to compile wealth. So, it means nothing, anyway, Rick Santorum.

SANTORUM: Well, the bottom line is what you're talking about is what's happened over the last 100 years is government has gotten more and more involved in the thing and it's put their finger on the scale and it's done just that. Crony capitalism, which is -- look. I was in Congress for 16 years. The lobbyists for all of the companies, some of whom you just mentioned, didn't come to Congress and say create a level playing field for us to compete. No, they didn't do that. They said we need this to help our business and so they went in and lobbied and, you know, you have an entire structure of government right now that is all about special interest savers for one group or another. We need to get back -- and that's one of the things I love about what Paul Ryan has suggested. We need to get back and get back to simpler tax code, get rid of all of these incentives and get rid of all of these things that tip the scales in favor of who has the most powerful lobbyists in Washington DC and if we do that, if we create that level playing field, we can have an America that allows people to prosper.

One of the things I was most proud of in my time in Congress was not my Chamber of Commerce rating or my big business rating. It was for the National Association of Small Businessmen. Those are the small business guys who actually are in Washington DC that say, Please, just create a level playing field, give us a chance to compete and we'll do just fine.

GLENN: Rick, I'm going to throw you a curve ball here. Allen Simpson talked about you the other day in the most flattering terms. I want to play what Allen Simpson said about you and Republicans like you and have you respond.

SIMPSON: I don't know, but if we're going to get into social issues, we won the governorship -- and I saw them saying that they've seen Christie. I mean, I saw him a few weeks ago. He is quite awesome, but we won a governorship there in New Jersey, one in Virginia by not talking about social issues. Who the hell is for abortion? I don't know anybody running around with a sign that says have an abortion, they're wonderful. They're hideous, but they're a deeply intimate and personal decision and I don't think men legislators should even vote on the issue. Then you've got homosexuality. You've got don't ask, don't tell. We have homophobes in our party. That's disgusting to me. We're all human beings. We're all God's children. Now, if they're going to get off in that stuff -- Santorum has said some cruel things, cruel, cruel things about homosexuals. Ask him about it. See if he agrees to the cruelness of his remarks, years ago. Foul. Now, you know --

GLENN: Okay. Stop.

PAT: What is that?

GLENN: The cruel, cruel remarks.

PAT: Cruel, cruel remarks. I don't think I've ever said that.

SANTORUM: There were no cruel, cruel remarks. All I can ponder is that Allen Simpson is talking about a comment that I made which I paraphrase almost word for word, but paraphrase a Supreme Court justice on a case calls Lawrence versus Texas, before that case came out which had to do with, as you know, a Supreme Court case on the issue of sodomy and I said that if you have -- if the Supreme Court case is the legal standard to say that sexual -- consensual sexual activity is now a Constitutional right, then we open up the gates for all sorts of consensual acts.

PAT: Okay.

SANTORUM: And that is, by the way, what Justice Windsor White, appointed by John Kennedy, said and that's what they said they were not going to allow that standard. I said the same thing.

PAT: Oh, geez.

SANTORUM: And unfortunately folks like Allen Simpson saw that as homophobic. It's not homophobic. It's a legal argument. In fact, that's exactly what's happening. We went from Lawrence versus Texas to now a Constitutional right to same sex marriage and they're going into a Constitutional right to polyamorous relationships. This is the slippery slope that we're heading down.

GLENN: Polyamorous relationships. Polyamorous. That is the most incredible --

SANTORUM: That's the term.

GLENN: Don't use polyamorous. (Laughter.) Geez. One last --

SANTORUM: I said it.

GLENN: One last -- one last question for you and, that is, the Middle East. I have been mocked and ridiculed for saying that there are those in the Middle East that want a caliphate that begins with Turkey, Egypt and Iran even though it's Sunni and Shia. They're working together for the first time. They're working together with socialists and communists, even though they don't have the same point of view on things, and they are destabilizing the Middle East. Iran wants to have control of a caliphate. They're talking about the return of the 12th Imam. Whether you believe it or not, that is an important development. I have also said that Iran has its hooks down in Central America, there are terrorists here in America and they are laying in wait for a Islamic extremist regime, they want Sharia law all over the globe. That's crazy, Rick

SANTORUM: I don't disagree with anything you just said. In fact, I've been writing about it for the last four years and as you know, because I was on your program in 2006, I was talking about those exact same things. I was considered, well, like you are just suggesting, crazy for suggesting that I talk about Hugo Chavez, I talked about the relationship between Venezuela and Iran. I talked about jihadist training camps in central and South America. That is all factually correct. That is, in fact, going on. There is no question that there are elements in the Middle East that would like to establish a caliphate and that, yes, Sunni and Shia are working together. Socialists and Islamists and jihadists are working together. Why? Because the enemy of my enemy is my friend and the United States is the enemy. Western civilization is the enemy. It's not because we have economically repressed them. It's not because we have invaded militarily. It's because of who we are. They object to western civilization. They object to the foundations of our society. They believe that they are evil and they believe that they are doing us a favor by concurring us and converting us to their view of the world.

GLENN: Is the country on the wrong side with Israel? Not the country. Is our administration and is our foreign policy -- have we changed our alliances, do you believe, or are in the midst of changing our alliances?

SANTORUM: Well, let's just look at what the Israelis say. Barack Obama's favorability ratings in the country of Israel is in single digits. So, the people in Israel believe that we've changed allegiances but unfortunately, as you know, Glenn, it's not just Israel. It's anybody that's a friend of the United States we turn our back to routinely. We believe that our job is to show to our enemies that we really, really don't -- aren't going to be good allies, that we're going to embrace them and warm-up to them and, as a result of warming up to them, that they're not going to be mean to us, they're not going to attack us, and one way of showing that is to stiff our allies on a continual basis and certainly nobody has been stiffed more in the last two years than Israel.

GLENN: Okay. I know I keep saying this is the last question, but I just thought of another one I have to ask you. The debt ceiling. Do we vote to extend the debt ceiling?

SANTORUM: No. Look. The only reason you vote to extend the debt ceiling is you get substantial concessions out of this administration on programs that have a meaningful change in the reduction of the deficit and to me, first and foremost, would be Obamacare. I think we have to -- we have to draw a line. This is the reason I objected to what was going on the last few weeks with the continued resolution. We're fighting over $10 billion, $20 billion. We've got to fight over -- we've got to fight over principles that matter for the future of our country.

GLENN: But when -- if you don't pass the debt ceiling, if you don't lift it, the country, the whole world, can go into a tailspin. Do you not believe that or do you think that it's best to do that?

SANTORUM: Well, first, there's certainly things you can do in passing legislation to actually make that our debts are paid and that what suffers is government programs in the sense of instead of having our credit worthiness affected, what you do is you affect the operations of government instead of our ability to pay our debt. There's still money coming in, enough money coming in to pay our debits if we prioritize how we use those expenditures and so I don't buy off on this, you know, we're going to fall off a cliff. We're going to fall off a cliff if we don't start doing something to deal with this debt and this is an opportunity for us to draw the line in the sand and put their backs to the wall on something that they really want.

GLENN: Rick Santorum, thank you so much, sir.

SANTORUM: Keep up the great work. I'm a big fan and a big listener. I appreciate it.

GLENN: Well, likewise. Thank you very much, Rick. We'll talk again. I think this guy -- and I said this in 2006. I think he's a Winston Churchill.

The number of people serving life sentences now exceeds the entire prison population in 1970, according to newly-released data from the Sentencing Project. The continued growth of life sentences is largely the result of "tough on crime" policies pushed by legislators in the 1990s, including presidential candidate Joe Biden.

Biden has since apologized for backing those types of policies, but it seems he has yet to learn his lesson. Indeed, Biden is backing yet another criminal justice policy with disastrous consequences—mandatory drug treatment for all drug offenders.

Proponents of this policy argue that forced drug treatment will reduce drug usage and recidivism and save lives. But the evidence simply isn't on their side. Mandatory treatment isn't just patently unethical, it's also ineffective—and dangerous.

Many well-meaning people view mandatory treatment as a positive alternative to incarceration. But there's a reason that mandatory treatment is also known as "compulsory confinement." As author Maya Schenwar asks in The Guardian, "If shepherding live human bodies off to prison to isolate and manipulate them without their permission isn't ethical, why is shipping those bodies off to compulsory rehab an acceptable alternative?" Compulsory treatment isn't an alternative to incarceration. It is incarceration.

Compulsory treatment is also arguably a breach of international human rights agreements and ethical standards. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) have made it clear that the standards of ethical treatment also apply to the treatment of drug dependence—standards that include the right to autonomy and self-determination. Indeed, according to UNODC, "people who use or are dependent on drugs do not automatically lack the capacity to consent to treatment...consent of the patient should be obtained before any treatment intervention." Forced treatment violates a person's right to be free from non-consensual medical treatment.

It's a useless endeavor, anyway, because studies have shown that it doesn't improve outcomes in reducing drug use and criminal recidivism. A review of nine studies, published in the International Journal of Drug Policy, failed to find sufficient evidence that compulsory drug treatment approaches are effective. The results didn't suggest improved outcomes in reducing drug use among drug-dependent individuals enrolled in compulsory treatment. However, some studies did suggest potential harm.

According to one study, 33% of compulsorily-treated participants were reincarcerated, compared to a mere 5% of the non-treatment sample population. Moreover, rates of post-release illicit drug use were higher among those who received compulsory treatment. Even worse, a 2016 report from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health found that people who received involuntary treatment were more than twice as likely to die of an opioid-related overdose than those with a history of only voluntary treatment.

These findings echo studies published in medical journals like Addiction and BMJ. A study in Addiction found that involuntary drug treatment was a risk factor for a non-fatal drug overdose. Similarly, a study in BMJ found that patients who successfully completed inpatient detoxification were more likely than other patients to die within a year. The high rate of overdose deaths by people previously involuntarily treated is likely because most people who are taken involuntarily aren't ready to stop using drugs, authors of the Addiction study reported. That makes sense. People who aren't ready to get clean will likely use again when they are released. For them, the only post-treatment difference will be lower tolerance, thanks to forced detoxification and abstinence. Indeed, a loss of tolerance, combined with the lack of a desire to stop using drugs, likely puts compulsorily-treated patients at a higher risk of overdose.

The UNODC agrees. In their words, compulsory treatment is "expensive, not cost-effective, and neither benefits the individual nor the community." So, then, why would we even try?

Biden is right to look for ways to combat addiction and drug crime outside of the criminal justice system. But forced drug treatment for all drug offenders is a flawed, unethical policy, with deadly consequences. If the goal is to help people and reduce harm, then there are plenty of ways to get there. Mandatory treatment isn't one of them.

Lindsay Marie is a policy analyst for the Lone Star Policy Institute, an independent think tank that promotes freedom and prosperity for all Texans. You can follow her on Twitter @LindsayMarieLP.

President Donald Trump's personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani joined Glenn Beck on Tuesday's radio program discuss the Senate's ongoing investigation into former vice president Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, and reveal new bombshell documents he's currently releasing.

Giuliani told Glenn he has evidence of "very, very serious crime at the highest levels of government," that the "corrupt media" is doing everything in their power to discredit.

He also dropped some major, previously unreported news: not only was Hunter Biden under investigation in 2016, when then-Vice President Biden "forced" the firing of Ukraine's prosecutor general Viktor Shokin, but so was the vice president himself.

"Shokin can prove he was investigating Biden and his son. And I now have the prosecutorial documents that show, all during that period of time, not only was Hunter Biden under investigation -- Joe Biden was under investigation," Giuliani explained. "It wasn't just Hunter."

Watch this clip to get a rundown of everything Giuliani has uncovered so far.

Use code GLENN to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

For most Americans, the 1980s was marked by big hair, epic lightsaber battles, and school-skipping Ferris Bueller dancing his way into the hearts of millions.

But for Bernie Sanders — who, by the way, was at that time the oldest-looking 40-year-old in human history — the 1980s was a period of important personal milestones.

Prior to his successful 1980 campaign to become mayor of Burlington, Vermont, Sanders was mostly known around the Green Mountain State as a crazy, wildly idealistic socialist. (Think Karl Marx meets Don Quixote.) But everything started to change for Sanders when he became famous—or, in the eyes of many, notorious—for being "America's socialist mayor."

As mayor, Sanders' radical ideas were finally given the attention he had always craved but couldn't manage to capture. This makes this period of his career particularly interesting to study. Unlike today, the Bernie Sanders of the 1980s wasn't concerned with winning over an entire nation — just the wave of far-left New York City exiles that flooded Vermont in the 1960s and 1970s — and he was much more willing to openly align himself with local and national socialist and communist parties.


www.youtube.com


Over the past few weeks, I have been reading news reports of Sanders recorded in the 1980s — because, you know, that's how guys like me spend their Saturday nights — and what I've found is pretty remarkable.

For starters, Sanders had (during the height of the Soviet Union) a very cozy relationship with people who openly advocated for Marxism and communism. He was an elector for the Socialist Workers Party and promoted the party's presidential candidates in 1980 and 1984.

To say the Socialist Workers Party was radical would be a tremendous understatement. It was widely known SWP was a communist organization mostly dedicated to the teachings of Marx and Leon Trotsky, one of the leaders of the Russian Revolution.

Among other radical things I've discovered in interviews Sanders conducted with the SWP's newspaper — appropriately named The Militant (seriously, you can't make this stuff up) — is a statement by Sanders published in June 1981 suggesting that some police departments "are dominated by fascists and Nazis," a comment that is just now being rediscovered for the first time in decades.

In 1980, Sanders lauded the Socialist Workers Party's "continued defense of the Cuban revolution." And later in the 1980s, Sanders reportedly endorsed a collection of speeches by the socialist Sandinistas in Nicaragua, even though there had been widespread media reports of the Sandinistas' many human rights violations prior to Sanders' endorsement, including "restrictions on free movement; torture; denial of due process; lack of freedom of thought, conscience and religion; denial of the right of association and of free labor unions."

Sanders also traveled to Nicaragua and met with socialist President Daniel Ortega. He later called the trip a "profoundly emotional experience."

Sanders also traveled to Nicaragua and met with socialist President Daniel Ortega. He later called the trip a "profoundly emotional experience."

Comrade Bernie's disturbing Marxist past, which is far more extensive than what can be covered in this short article, shouldn't be treated as a mere historical footnote. It clearly illustrates that Sanders' brand of "democratic socialism" is much more than a $15 minimum wage and calls for single-payer health care. It's full of Marxist philosophy, radical revolutionary thinking, anti-police rhetoric, and even support for authoritarian governments.

Millions of Americans have been tricked into thinking Sanders isn't the radical communist the historical record — and even Sanders' own words — clearly show that he is. But the deeper I have dug into Comrade Bernie's past, the more evident it has become that his thinking is much darker and more dangerous and twisted than many of his followers ever imagined.

Tomorrow night, don't miss Glenn Beck's special exposing the radicals who are running Bernie Sanders' campaign. From top to bottom, his campaign is staffed with hard-left extremists who are eager to burn down the system. The threat to our constitution is very real from Bernie's team, and it's unlike anything we've ever seen before in a U.S. election. Join Glenn on Wednesday, at 9 PM Eastern on BlazeTV's YouTube page, and on BlazeTV.com. And just in case you miss it live, the only way to catch all of Glenn's specials on-demand is by subscribing to Blaze TV.

Justin Haskins (Jhaskins@heartland.org) is editorial director of The Heartland Institute and editor-in-chief of StoppingSocialism.com.

Candace Owens, BLEXIT founder and author of the upcoming book, "Blackout," joined Glenn Beck on Friday's GlennTV for an exclusive interview. available only to BlazeTV subscribers.

Candace dropped a few truth-bombs about the progressive movement and what's happening to the Democratic Party. She said people are practically running away from the left due to their incessant push to dig up dirt on anybody who disagrees with their radical ideology. She explained how -- like China and its "social credit score" -- the left is shaping America into its own nightmarish episode of "Black Mirror."

"This game of making sure that everyone is politically correct is a societal atom bomb. There are no survivors. There's no one that is perfect," Candace said. "The idea that humanity can be perfect is Godless. If you accept that there is something greater than us, then you accept that we a flawed. To be human is to be flawed."

Enjoy this clip from the full episode below:

youtu.be


BlazeTV subscribers can watch the full interview on BlazeTV.com. Use code GLENN to save $10 off one year of your subscription.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.