Would this letter change your life?

An employee of Glenn's provided him a letter from February 25, 1918 that was written to his grandfather, Henry. The letter came from a colleague of Henry's father, Charles Rose. Glenn was so moved by the letter he felt the need to read it on-air and share it's message with the audience.

"As I read this, I think to myself, my gosh, does this even happen anymore?" Glenn said.

Charles takes the opportunity to write to Henry about marriage, friends, life, family, and respect; providing advice from an older man's perspective. Charles points out one of Henry's vice's being "selfishness," providing an example of a time Henry berated his father for a phone call his father made out of love and pride. Charles writes, "I truly felt sorry for your father, for I could see it hurt him. I felt more sorry for you, that you should have been so unmindful of his feelings as to talk to him in this manner before anyone...I know it was not through unkindness, on your part, but unthinking, selfishness, and egotism."

Towards the end of the letter Charles imparts some final wisdom on young Henry, saying, "Live a good, clean, honest, and virtuous life. Do every kind act you can in your voyage through life. Honor your father and mother. Make them your closest friends and confidantes."

After Glenn read the letter, he reflected on the power behind Charles' words, and pondered "Do we have any of these principles in common anymore at all?" While 1918 was awhile ago, what has happened to us? One of the questions Glenn asked was about the parents of Henry, "Would the parents even say, Charles, thank you for that? Or would they say, who are you to write to my son that way?"

A letter like that leaves one to think about a lot. It is important for us to remember where we came from and it is essential for younger generations to accept the advice of those older and wiser. We should stop blaming others and focus on our own personal journey and growth, even when we do not want to hear our faults.

While Brad was not able to provide much background information about his grandfather, except that he passed away in 1926, eight years after this letter was written, it is obvious the letter had some effect on him to have kept it. As Glenn said:

"I wish I could tell you, in 1918, this man received this letter, changed his life. The only evidence I have of that, is that this letter still exists. Which means to me: At least in those eight years, it meant enough for him to keep it.And whoever he did marry, it meant enough to her to pass it on to the grandchildren."

20150115_120824 (1)

Rough Transcript Below:

GLENN: Brad, who works for our company, came in yesterday. And he gave me a letter from February 25th, 1918. And it was written to his grandfather.

And he said, Glenn, you might want to read this. As I read this, I think to myself, my gosh, does this even happen anymore?

It's a letter to his grandfather from his great grandfather's business partner.

It says:

My Dear Henry, you have seen and know so little about me, that you may be surprised to receive this letter.

If so, I hope you will not be displeased with its contents. Also, that you will appreciate the sentiment that prompts me to write.

When I first met you one evening at your home, I was greatly impressed with your personality, your easy manner in conversation. And in addition to which, I noticed you were self-reliant and aggressive. All of this I admired and felt particularly interested in your progress and success.

I'm sorry to learn that you have abandoned this education that you might have had, but that you reached a point where it was not an irreparable loss.

College presents opportunities difficult to obtain later in life. Still, the schooling of actual business is, after all, the thing that tells us in the long-run and brings out the best qualities that ones possesses.

I was quite shocked one day, however, when you came to the office and took your father to task for having called your employer, as any proud father naturally would. Your father called to inquire of your progress and the possibilities and the position that you had so cleverly obtained and filled for some time.

I truly felt sorry for your father, for I could see it hurt him. I felt more sorry for you, that you should have been so unmindful of his feelings as to talk to him in this manner before anyone. And I, a comparatible stranger.

I know it was not through unkindness, on your part, but unthinking, selfishness, and egotism.

I felt a special interest in you at all times and have asked after you and what you have been doing.

Even more account, I could see signs of disappointment in your father when he replied to you, that he had made just another change or that he seldom heard from you or about your plans.

Just how far I'm right about this in this respect, I cannot say. But I think I can read human nature sufficiently.

I do know how I should feel if I were in his place and a son of mine ignored me and my advice and my opinion after all of the years of anxiety and care of bringing him up through childhood to manhood.

A father and mother's ambition for success of their children is far greater than that of their sons or daughters. I've stated my case, as it appeals to my sentiments, and I want to make some suggestions that I think, if you will listen to, you will some day, some day say, they're not out of the way or misplaced.

I admire your self-reliance. I admire your aggressiveness. I admire your self-esteem. If you were true to yourself and others, they will ensure your success wherever you are and whatever you do.

But I can see that there is selfishness that you need to curb. Also, that you need to cultivate concentration and avoid a narrow view of life, just for the day's occupation, pleasure, or profit. Don't be the day worker with no thought of the future, but plan ahead so what you will have done one day is a steppingstone and advancement for the next.

Save your time. Save your money. Save your experience. So that you will, at all times, be ahead of the game and have reserve for any and all contingencies.

One of the most necessary things in this world for success is to have friends. Real friends. Real friends of the right kind. They do not come to you accidentally. You have to find them and gather them in. To do so, you must go among men and women of character. Your thoughtfulness, your kindness to others will bear fruit and be returned to you.

Your father and your mother are your best friends. They're the best you can or will ever have. Their love and sympathy are assured and their advice is sure to be disinterested and for you and your greatest welfare. And their ambition for you is higher than your own. Therefore, cultivate their sympathy and their thoughts, and show something more than business courtesy to your parents.

Right often, open your heart. Open your heart so they may know the joys or sorrows. That they may rejoice with you in your success and sympathize with you in your failures or sorrows.

Don't get entangled in any manner with man or woman that will result in you becoming a slave. When you have reached a point where you are in a way to afford it, look among your women friends, to the ones who have the kindest heart and most likely to be a help to you, and not only an ornament, just a play thing, but select her as a life companion.

Above all, do not rush into matrimony with the idea that two can live less than one, and when it is too late await to find you are united to one who is a drag or one that you love for whom you cannot do all that is necessary.

Live a good, clean, honest, and virtuous life. Do every kind act you can in your voyage through life. Honor your father and mother. Make them your closest friends and confidantes.

I'm writing you in the spirit I should like to have someone write to me when I was your age. I hope you will write to me sometime, knowing that I can appreciate a young man's feeling and shall always be happy to help you in any way I can. You have my very best wishes for your success. Know that your happiness is my sincerest concern and believe my sincerity and affection.

Your friend, Charles Rose.

I read that, 1918. And I thought, does anybody even say those things anymore? Can you even say those things anymore? Can you imagine writing that to someone saying, look, I'm just a business associate with your father, but I saw something, and I just want to say some things. Unsolicited. Can you imagine? Would the parents even say, Charles, thank you for that? Or would they say, who are you to write to my son that way? Do we have any of these principles in common anymore at all?

When I got this letter, my thoughts went to, so tell me about your grandfather. Tell me about Henry, who got this letter.

He said, well, I didn't know him.

This letter was written in 1918. His grandfather died I think in 1926.

They were doing an air show. These barnstormers came. And he got into one of the airplanes. And he was taken for a ride. It was a thrill. 1926. It was a thrill.

He got off the plane. Turned the wrong direction and walked into the prop.

I wish I were Paul Harvey. I wish I could tell you, in 1918, this man received this letter, changed his life. The only evidence I have of that, is that this letter still exists. Which means to me: At least in those eight years, it meant enough for him to keep it.

And whoever he did marry, it meant enough to her to pass it on to the grandchildren.

Megyn Kelly is not happy about the "disgusting" media coverage of President Donald Trump, specifically pointing to Lesley Stahl's "60 Minutes" interview on CBS Sunday.

On the radio program, Megyn told Glenn Beck the media has become so blinded by the "Trump Derangement Syndrome" that they've lost their own credibility — and now they can't get it back.

"It's disgusting. It's stomach-turning," Megyn said of the media's coverage of the president. "But it's just a continuation of what we've seen over the past couple of years. Their 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' has blinded them to what they're doing to their own credibility. They can't get it back. It's too late. They've already sacrificed it. And now no one is listening to them other than the hard partisans for whom they craft their news."

Megyn also discussed how she would have covered the recent stories about Hunter and Joe Biden's alleged corruption. Watch the video below to catch more of the conversation:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Imagine sometime next year, getting called before HUWAC – the House Un-Woke Activities Committee.

"Are you or have you ever been a member of the un-woke?"

Something like that is not as far-fetched as you might think.

Last week, Robert Reich, the former Secretary of Labor during the Clinton administration, now a UC Berkeley professor, tweeted this:

Since the 1970s, there have been dozens of "Truth Commissions" around the world like the kind Robert Reich wants in America. Most of these have been set up in Africa and Latin America. Usually it happens in countries after a civil war, or where there's been a regime change – a dictator is finally overthrown, and a commission is set up to address atrocities that happened under the dictator. Or, as in the commissions in East Germany and Czechoslovakia, atrocities under communism. Or, in the most famous example, South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation commission addressed the decades of apartheid that ravaged that nation.

These commissions usually conclude with an official final report. These commissions and reports have served as a means of governments trying to close a dark chapter of their country's history, or provide emotional catharsis, as a way to generally move on. Sometimes it kind of works for people, most of the time it leaves people clamoring for more justice.

Here's how one professor described truth commissions in an article in The Conversation last year. He wrote:

The goal of a truth commission… is to hold public hearings to establish the scale and impact of a past injustice, typically involving wide-scale human rights abuses, and make it part of the permanent, unassailable public record. Truth commissions also officially recognize victims and perpetrators in an effort to move beyond the painful past… Some have been used cynically as tools for governments to legitimize themselves by pretending they have dealt with painful history when they have only kicked the can down the road.

See, this is the problem with a lot of "Truth" commissions – they are inherently political. Even if you trust your government and give them all the benefit of the doubt in the world that their Truth commission is trying to do the right thing, it is ALWAYS going to be political. Because these truth commissions are never set up by those who have LOST power in government. They're always established by those who have WON power.

The Deputy Executive Director of the International Center for Transitional Justice says one of the main points in these Truth commissions is that "the victims become protagonists."

A Department of Anti-racism is entirely within the realm of possibility.

So, who are the victims in Robert Reich's America? People like him, members of the far-Left who had to endure the atrocities of four years of a president with different political ideas. What an injustice. I mean, the left's suffering during the Trump administration is almost on the level of apartheid or genocide – so we totally need a Truth commission.

There have been lots of calls for the U.S. to have its own Truth and Reconciliation commission, especially around racial injustice.

This past June, Democratic Congresswoman Barbara Lee of California introduced legislation to establish the " United States Commission on Truth, Racial Healing, and Transformation."

Ibram X. Kendi – the high priest of anti-racism, and author of Target's current favorite book " Antiracist Baby" – proposes a Constitutional anti-racism amendment. This amendment would:

establish and permanently fund the Department of Anti-racism (DOA) comprised of formally trained experts on racism and no political appointees. The DOA would be responsible for pre-clearing all local, state and federal public policies to ensure they won't yield racial inequity, monitor those policies, investigate private racist policies when racial inequity surfaces, and monitor public officials for expressions of racist ideas. The DOA would be empowered with disciplinary tools to wield over and against policymakers and public officials who do not voluntarily change their racist policy and ideas.

If you think that is far-fetched, you haven't been paying attention to the Left's growing radicalism. In a Joe Biden-Kamala Harris administration, a Department of Anti-racism is entirely within the realm of possibility. And of course, such a DOA would never stop at policing government.

We're in a dangerous, precarious moment in our history. Given the events of 2020, should Democrats gain the White House, the Senate, and the House, how many commissions will be in our future? They will suddenly have plenty of political capital to drag the nation through years of commission hearings.

And the Left's form of justice is never satisfied. You think it will stop at a T&R commission on race? MSNBC's Chris Hayes tweeted this month about the need for a commission to deal with Americans who are skeptical about wearing masks:

Or what about a Truth commission on religion? I mean, look at those reckless churches spreading Covid this year. Or this would be a big one – a T&R commission on climate change deniers.

The Left is highly selective when it comes to truth. That's why they are the very last group you want in charge of anything with "Truth and Reconciliation" in the title.

This is one of the most incredibly frustrating things about the Left in America today. The Left insists there is no such thing as absolute truth, while simultaneously insisting there are certain approved truths that are undeniable.

So, you can't question "Science" – even though that's pretty much what every great scientist in history did.

You can't question racism as the explanation for all of existence – because, well, just because.

You can't question third-party "Fact-checkers" – because the powers that be, mainly Big Tech right now, have decided they are the Truth referees and you have to trust what they say because they're using certified external fact-checkers. They just forgot to tell you that they actually fund these third-party fact-checkers. It's like if McDonald's told you to trust third-party health inspectors that they were paying for.

The Left thinks it has a monopoly on Truth. They're the enlightened ones, because they've had the correct instruction, they're privy to the actual facts. It's psychotic arrogance. If you don't buy what they're selling, even if you're just skeptical of it, it's because you either don't have the facts, you willingly deny the facts, or you're simply incapable of grasping the truth because you're blinded by your raging racism problem. It's most likely the racism problem.

The Left never learns from its own preaching. For the past 60-plus years they've decried the House Un-American Activities Committee for trying to root out communists, getting people canceled, ruining Hollywood careers, etcetera. But a HUAC-type committee is precisely what Robert Reich is describing and many on the Left want. It's not enough for Trump to be voted out of office. Americans who helped put him there must be punished. They don't want reconciliation, they want retribution. Because the Left doesn't simply loathe Donald Trump, the Left loathes YOU.

President Donald Trump's performance at last night's final presidential debate was "brilliant" and "the best he's ever done," Glenn Beck said on the radio program Friday.

Glenn described the moments he thought President Trump came across as "sincere," "kind," and "well-informed," as well as Joe Biden's biggest downfalls for of the night — from his big statement on wanting to eliminate the oil industry to his unsurprising gaffes as the debate neared the end. But, the question remains: was Trump's "brilliant performance" enough to win the election?

Watch the video be low to get Glenn's take on the final debate before the November 3 election:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

This is a moment "Cynical Theories" author James Lindsay probably hoped would never come. The liberal mathematician and host of the "New Discourses Podcast" recently came out as "unhappily" voting Republican, including for President Donald Trump, because the Democratic Party is now being controlled by a far-left movement that seeks to destroy our country and the U.S. Constitution.

He joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Thursday to explain why this election isn't "Trump versus Biden." It's Trump versus a "movement that wants to tear apart American society at its very foundation." Lindsay warned that if it isn't stopped, the left can toss out our rights by rewriting the Constitution — or abolishing it altogether.

"A lot of people don't understand what's happening with the election we have right now," he said. "They think it's a choice between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. And at the surface level, of course, it is. We're voting for each candidate to be duly put into the office of president. But that's not what we really have going on. We have, in Donald Trump, a man who's going to govern as we've all seen — the way he feels like he's going to govern. And we have in Joe Biden, a man captured by a movement that wants to tear apart the American society at its very foundation."

Lindsay noted the popular leftist narratives that call to "abolish anything they don't like," which now includes the U.S. Constitution. He added that "this is the movement that is controlling the Democratic Party."

"It is my belief, that there has been a largely effective kind of silent coup of the Democratic Party, that's turned it completely under the control of this movement. And that's what we're going to be electing with Joe Biden. So I can't do it," he said.

Watch the video below for more details: