Would this letter change your life?

An employee of Glenn's provided him a letter from February 25, 1918 that was written to his grandfather, Henry. The letter came from a colleague of Henry's father, Charles Rose. Glenn was so moved by the letter he felt the need to read it on-air and share it's message with the audience.

"As I read this, I think to myself, my gosh, does this even happen anymore?" Glenn said.

Charles takes the opportunity to write to Henry about marriage, friends, life, family, and respect; providing advice from an older man's perspective. Charles points out one of Henry's vice's being "selfishness," providing an example of a time Henry berated his father for a phone call his father made out of love and pride. Charles writes, "I truly felt sorry for your father, for I could see it hurt him. I felt more sorry for you, that you should have been so unmindful of his feelings as to talk to him in this manner before anyone...I know it was not through unkindness, on your part, but unthinking, selfishness, and egotism."

Towards the end of the letter Charles imparts some final wisdom on young Henry, saying, "Live a good, clean, honest, and virtuous life. Do every kind act you can in your voyage through life. Honor your father and mother. Make them your closest friends and confidantes."

After Glenn read the letter, he reflected on the power behind Charles' words, and pondered "Do we have any of these principles in common anymore at all?" While 1918 was awhile ago, what has happened to us? One of the questions Glenn asked was about the parents of Henry, "Would the parents even say, Charles, thank you for that? Or would they say, who are you to write to my son that way?"

A letter like that leaves one to think about a lot. It is important for us to remember where we came from and it is essential for younger generations to accept the advice of those older and wiser. We should stop blaming others and focus on our own personal journey and growth, even when we do not want to hear our faults.

While Brad was not able to provide much background information about his grandfather, except that he passed away in 1926, eight years after this letter was written, it is obvious the letter had some effect on him to have kept it. As Glenn said:

"I wish I could tell you, in 1918, this man received this letter, changed his life. The only evidence I have of that, is that this letter still exists. Which means to me: At least in those eight years, it meant enough for him to keep it.And whoever he did marry, it meant enough to her to pass it on to the grandchildren."

20150115_120824 (1)

Rough Transcript Below:

GLENN: Brad, who works for our company, came in yesterday. And he gave me a letter from February 25th, 1918. And it was written to his grandfather.

And he said, Glenn, you might want to read this. As I read this, I think to myself, my gosh, does this even happen anymore?

It's a letter to his grandfather from his great grandfather's business partner.

It says:

My Dear Henry, you have seen and know so little about me, that you may be surprised to receive this letter.

If so, I hope you will not be displeased with its contents. Also, that you will appreciate the sentiment that prompts me to write.

When I first met you one evening at your home, I was greatly impressed with your personality, your easy manner in conversation. And in addition to which, I noticed you were self-reliant and aggressive. All of this I admired and felt particularly interested in your progress and success.

I'm sorry to learn that you have abandoned this education that you might have had, but that you reached a point where it was not an irreparable loss.

College presents opportunities difficult to obtain later in life. Still, the schooling of actual business is, after all, the thing that tells us in the long-run and brings out the best qualities that ones possesses.

I was quite shocked one day, however, when you came to the office and took your father to task for having called your employer, as any proud father naturally would. Your father called to inquire of your progress and the possibilities and the position that you had so cleverly obtained and filled for some time.

I truly felt sorry for your father, for I could see it hurt him. I felt more sorry for you, that you should have been so unmindful of his feelings as to talk to him in this manner before anyone. And I, a comparatible stranger.

I know it was not through unkindness, on your part, but unthinking, selfishness, and egotism.

I felt a special interest in you at all times and have asked after you and what you have been doing.

Even more account, I could see signs of disappointment in your father when he replied to you, that he had made just another change or that he seldom heard from you or about your plans.

Just how far I'm right about this in this respect, I cannot say. But I think I can read human nature sufficiently.

I do know how I should feel if I were in his place and a son of mine ignored me and my advice and my opinion after all of the years of anxiety and care of bringing him up through childhood to manhood.

A father and mother's ambition for success of their children is far greater than that of their sons or daughters. I've stated my case, as it appeals to my sentiments, and I want to make some suggestions that I think, if you will listen to, you will some day, some day say, they're not out of the way or misplaced.

I admire your self-reliance. I admire your aggressiveness. I admire your self-esteem. If you were true to yourself and others, they will ensure your success wherever you are and whatever you do.

But I can see that there is selfishness that you need to curb. Also, that you need to cultivate concentration and avoid a narrow view of life, just for the day's occupation, pleasure, or profit. Don't be the day worker with no thought of the future, but plan ahead so what you will have done one day is a steppingstone and advancement for the next.

Save your time. Save your money. Save your experience. So that you will, at all times, be ahead of the game and have reserve for any and all contingencies.

One of the most necessary things in this world for success is to have friends. Real friends. Real friends of the right kind. They do not come to you accidentally. You have to find them and gather them in. To do so, you must go among men and women of character. Your thoughtfulness, your kindness to others will bear fruit and be returned to you.

Your father and your mother are your best friends. They're the best you can or will ever have. Their love and sympathy are assured and their advice is sure to be disinterested and for you and your greatest welfare. And their ambition for you is higher than your own. Therefore, cultivate their sympathy and their thoughts, and show something more than business courtesy to your parents.

Right often, open your heart. Open your heart so they may know the joys or sorrows. That they may rejoice with you in your success and sympathize with you in your failures or sorrows.

Don't get entangled in any manner with man or woman that will result in you becoming a slave. When you have reached a point where you are in a way to afford it, look among your women friends, to the ones who have the kindest heart and most likely to be a help to you, and not only an ornament, just a play thing, but select her as a life companion.

Above all, do not rush into matrimony with the idea that two can live less than one, and when it is too late await to find you are united to one who is a drag or one that you love for whom you cannot do all that is necessary.

Live a good, clean, honest, and virtuous life. Do every kind act you can in your voyage through life. Honor your father and mother. Make them your closest friends and confidantes.

I'm writing you in the spirit I should like to have someone write to me when I was your age. I hope you will write to me sometime, knowing that I can appreciate a young man's feeling and shall always be happy to help you in any way I can. You have my very best wishes for your success. Know that your happiness is my sincerest concern and believe my sincerity and affection.

Your friend, Charles Rose.

I read that, 1918. And I thought, does anybody even say those things anymore? Can you even say those things anymore? Can you imagine writing that to someone saying, look, I'm just a business associate with your father, but I saw something, and I just want to say some things. Unsolicited. Can you imagine? Would the parents even say, Charles, thank you for that? Or would they say, who are you to write to my son that way? Do we have any of these principles in common anymore at all?

When I got this letter, my thoughts went to, so tell me about your grandfather. Tell me about Henry, who got this letter.

He said, well, I didn't know him.

This letter was written in 1918. His grandfather died I think in 1926.

They were doing an air show. These barnstormers came. And he got into one of the airplanes. And he was taken for a ride. It was a thrill. 1926. It was a thrill.

He got off the plane. Turned the wrong direction and walked into the prop.

I wish I were Paul Harvey. I wish I could tell you, in 1918, this man received this letter, changed his life. The only evidence I have of that, is that this letter still exists. Which means to me: At least in those eight years, it meant enough for him to keep it.

And whoever he did marry, it meant enough to her to pass it on to the grandchildren.

Most self-proclaimed Marxists know very little about Marxism. Some of them have all the buzzwords memorized. They talk about the exploits of labor. They talk about the slavery of capitalist society and the alienation caused by capital. They talk about the evils of power and domination.

But they don't actually believe what they say. Or else they wouldn't be such violent hypocrites. And we're not being dramatic when we say "violent."

For them, Marxism is a political tool that they use to degrade and annoy their political enemies.

They don't actually care about the working class.

Another important thing to remember about Marxists is that they talk about how they want to defend the working class, but they don't actually understand the working class. They definitely don't realize that the working class is composed mostly of so many of the people they hate. Because, here's the thing, they don't actually care about the working class. Or the middle class. They wouldn't have the slightest clue how to actually work, not the way we do. For them, work involves ranting about how work and labor are evil.

Ironically, if their communist utopia actually arrived, they would be the first ones against the wall. Because they have nothing to offer except dissent. They have no practical use and no real connection to reality.

Again ironically, they are the ultimate proof of the success of capitalism. The fact that they can freely call for its demise, in tweets that they send from their capitalistic iPhones, is proof that capitalism affords them tremendous luxuries.

Their specialty is complaining. They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They sneer at Christianity for promising Heaven in exchange for good deeds on earth — which is a terrible description of Christianity, but it's what they actually believe — and at the same time they criticize Christianity for promising a utopia, they give their unconditional devotion to a religion that promises a utopia.

They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They think capitalism has turned us into machines. Which is a bad interpretation of Marx's concept of the General Intellect, the idea that humans are the ones who create machines, so humans, not God, are the creators.

They think that the only way to achieve the perfect society is by radically changing and even destroying the current society. It's what they mean when they say things about the "status quo" and "hegemony" and the "established order." They believe that the system is broken and the way to fix it is to destroy, destroy, destroy.

Critical race theory actually takes it a step farther. It tells us that the racist system can never be changed. That racism is the original sin that white people can never overcome. Of course, critical race theorists suggest "alternative institutions," but these "alternative institutions" are basically the same as the ones we have now, only less effective and actually racist.

Marx's violent revolution never happened. Or at least it never succeeded. Marx's followers have had to take a different approach. And now, we are living through the Revolution of Constant Whining.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.

Americans are losing faith in our justice system and the idea that legal consequences are applied equally — even to powerful elites in office.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to detail what he believes will come next with the Durham investigation, which hopefully will provide answers to the Obama FBI's alleged attempts to sabotage former President Donald Trump and his campaign years ago.

Rep. Nunes and Glenn assert that we know Trump did NOT collude with Russia, and that several members of the FBI possibly committed huge abuses of power. So, when will we see justice?

Watch the video clip below:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The corporate media is doing everything it can to protect Dr. Anthony Fauci after Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) roasted him for allegedly lying to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

During an extremely heated exchange at a Senate hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Paul challenged Dr. Fauci — who, as the director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, oversees research programs at the National Institute of Health — on whether the NIH funded dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Dr. Fauci denied the claims, but as Sen. Paul knows, there are documents that prove Dr. Fauci's NIH was funding gain-of-function research in the Wuhan biolab before COVID-19 broke out in China.

On "The Glenn Beck Program," Glenn and Producer Stu Burguiere presented the proof, because Dr. Fauci's shifting defenses don't change the truth.

Watch the video clip below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Critical race theory: A special brand of evil

wal_172619/Pixabay

Part of what makes it hard for us to challenge the left is that their beliefs are complicated. We don't mean complicated in a positive way. They aren't complicated the way love is complicated. They're complicated because there's no good explanation for them, no basis in reality.

The left cannot pull their heads out of the clouds. They are stuck on romantic ideas, abstract ideas, universal ideas. They talk in theories. They see the world through ideologies. They cannot divorce themselves from their own academic fixations. And — contrary to what they believe and how they act — it's not because leftists are smarter than the rest of us. And studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country. Marx was no different. The Communist Manifesto talks about how the rise of cities "rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life."

Studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country.

Instead of admitting that they're pathological hypocrites, they tell us that we're dumb and tell us to educate ourselves. Okay, so we educate ourselves; we return with a coherent argument. Then they say, "Well, you can't actually understand what you just said unless you understand the work of this other obscure Marxist writer. So educate yourselves more."

It's basically the "No True Scotsman" fallacy, the idea that when you point out a flaw in someone's argument, they say, "Well, that's a bad example."

After a while, it becomes obvious that there is no final destination for their bread-crumb trail. Everything they say is based on something that somebody else said, which is based on something somebody else said.

Take critical race theory. We're sure you've noticed by now that it is not evidence-based — at all. It is not, as academics say, a quantitative method. It doesn't use objective facts and data to arrive at conclusions. Probably because most of those conclusions don't have any basis in reality.

Critical race theory is based on feelings. These feelings are based on theories that are also based on feelings.

We wanted to trace the history of critical race theory back to the point where its special brand of evil began. What allowed it to become the toxic, racist monster that it is today?

Later, we'll tell you about some of the snobs who created critical theory, which laid the groundwork for CRT. But if you follow the bread-crumb trail from their ideas, you wind up with Marxism.

For years, the staff has devoted a lot of time to researching Marxism. We have read a lot of Marx and Marxist writing. It's part of our promise to you to be as informed as possible, so that you know where to go for answers; so that you know what to say when your back is up against the wall. What happens when we take the bread-crumb trail back farther, past Marxism? What is it based on?

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism.

It's actually based on the work of one of the most important philosophers in human history, a 19th-century German philosopher named Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism. And, as you'll see in just a bit, if we look at Hegel's actual ideas, it's obvious that Marx completely misrepresented them in order to confirm his own fantasies.

So, in a way, that's where the bread-crumb trail ends: With Marx's misrepresentation of an incredibly important, incredibly useful philosophy, a philosophy that's actually pretty conservative.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.