The Constitution Is a Flight Plan

In Alice and Wonderland, Alice is standing in a roadway, leading in opposite directions. And Alice says out loud, "Which way do I go?" And the Cheshire cat says, "Well, it depends on where you want to end up."

"I'm not sure," says Alice.

"Well then, if you don't know where you're going, it doesn't matter much which way you turn, now does it?"

I heard that yesterday, and it made me think: Where are we going? I'm not even sure if we even know anymore. And maybe some of us have never known. Maybe the Cheshire cat is right: We're all mad here. Perhaps it's why so many people have tuned out. Perhaps those people know something that we don't. Like Cheshire cat, they have figured out that we don't know where we're going, so it really doesn't matter which direction we choose.

Image: Rischgitz/Getty Images Image: Rischgitz/Getty Images

Then again, maybe those people actually know less than we do. Perhaps they don't realize that we are headed somewhere. And, in fact, we're already in flight. But where is it that we want to end up as a man, a woman, a parent, community, a country? Where do we actually see ourselves at the end of this journey?

Up until this weekend, I thought I knew. And then I realized, I've never really verbalized it. Not to you, maybe not even to myself. I'm not sure I've actually seen the finished destination in my head. What I've done is focused on the map, instead of directions, compass points, waypoints, places we've been along the way.

I've seen a vision that's over 200 years old. And now others in this country believe in a vision that is even older than that. Because Marx really made what happened at the tower of Babel seem new. Neither of these visions, however, are destinations. These visions are simply tools to help us navigate. Socialism, capitalism, constitutionalism, those are tools, those are maps, those are the GPS of our day, but they are not destinations.

So many people think the destination is the party. But that's not a destination, that's a tool too. Actually the parties are more like airlines or the vehicles that take us to our destination, they say safely. But I'm not sure we select a mode of travel until we know if, when, and where we want to go.

How could you possibly know what kind of vehicle you need if you don't know where we're headed? How can you get to a place that you haven't even stated as your destination? How do you even know you have the right map? If we don't have the tools, the gear, how do you get there?

After that, you can decide whether we need an engineer, a pilot, or a bus driver.

What I thought this weekend is maybe we shouldn't be choosing a candidate if we haven't figured out where we want to end up. It's why Bernie Sanders, I believe, is doing so well. He's handing us a picture of a destination: A beautiful vacation spot that's easy, fair, and inexpensive.

Now, Bernie Sanders is as outdated as a Main Street travel agency, and his brochure that he's passing out is dog-eared and battered and from the 1960s. It's a faded picture that shows a beautiful Marxist and socialist company, one that resembles Sweden in the 1970s. But as you comb through the pages and read the fine print, you realize this trip has many restrictions. "Photos seen are representations," says the brochure. "Your destination may be different. Prices may vary."

What Bernie Sanders is selling, what Bernie Sanders -- the brochure he's handing out from his outdated travel agency is dated. And nobody goes to a travel agency anymore, but somehow or another, his doors are open. Why? Because he's the only one handing out a brochure for you to look at. He's the only one talking about going someplace, going someplace new, going someplace with promise and hope and a different experience.

Photo: Scott Olson/Getty Images Photo: Scott Olson/Getty Images

I don't agree with it. But what are we offering? Think about this. We're salesmen on a destination. What is it that we're offering? We're not even offering a destination. What's on our departure screens? What's on our travel brochures? We're going to win. We're going to win lots. We're going to lead. We're going to create more jobs. We're going to defeat ISIS. We're going to be more like the Reagan era. We're going to beat Hillary. We're going to build a fence. We're going to restore the Constitution.

What does any of that look like? And let's be honest, none of those are destinations. None of that is exciting. None of that is inspiring. It isn't a place that makes me want to work hard, save up, lay awake dreaming about, telling my children about, or even getting into a car and driving to the airport to get to.

The travel brochure that I've been sharing with people: saving the Western way of life. That's what's on my brochure. But let's look at the fine print on my travel brochure. Saving the Western way of life? The Western way of life is corrupt, selfish, greedy, dirty -- at least that's what most people think. Our culture is shallow, fast food, angry, violent, full of drugs, empty sex, designer labels, and disposable. Let's save it for our families. Really? All the broken homes without two parents. A redesign of what parents and family even mean.

What does a family mean to most under 30 today? The internet, school, and culture has become our parent. Who wants to go there?

Frankly, saving our way of life, saving our way of life is what most conservatives feel they're already doing. But why would I plan a journey to a place I already live as a grind every day?

We're headed someplace, whether we admit it or like it or not. All of us, we're headed someplace as a country, together. And I don't hear anybody articulating a destination where we all want to go.

Would you ever get on to a plane and as it's taking off, saying to the guy sitting next to you, "By the way, where are we headed?" I wouldn't.

Would you go on a vacation without choosing the destination? I wouldn't. But we all have. And we've done it every four years for our entire life.

Do any of the much-discussed and passionately argued reasons to vote for this guy or that guy revolve around a destination?

I realized over the weekend, it's as if we're on an airplane to an unknown destination, and we're about to make a fuel stop; and everybody on the plane is just arguing about the airline or the pilot, and there's only two airlines that we ever know about. And they have very much the same destinations and the same pilots. They're similar, but slightly different skills. And all of us, the passengers are taking each other apart in trying to choose a new pilot or a new airplane, and we're not talking about where the hell the plane is even going. It's unreasonable.

Photo: BENOIT DOPPAGNE/AFP/Getty Images) Photo: BENOIT DOPPAGNE/AFP/Getty Images)

Each pilot, each airline may be headed in the same direction with maybe a slightly different destination or rate of speed reaching that final stop. And that final destination may be fine for some, and even those who claim to be very much like us, but is it right for us?

Do people even realize that there's a choice of where we end up?

Maybe we need to have a conversation to understand where every passenger wants to go and where they think we're going. Maybe some will want to go someplace else. But those same people will insist on the same plane and the same pilot whose course will never allow them to reach where they think they want to go. But they'll fight for their airline because it's the only one they know. And advertising has made them loyal beyond reason. They think that choosing another flight means that they're admitting that they were wrong about the last flight.

"Hey, I have to fly this airline. I'm part of the mileage rewards program. I can't choose another airline now. I'll lose all of my points."

Some will never see the choice in airlines or pilots or even destination because the flight stewards, with the help of the curtain that's pulled between first class and coach have blinded them to any different option.

Maybe what we need to ask ourselves and those sitting around us is, "Where do you want to go? You know, we're about to land for fuel. Why don't we keep our stub and get off the plane for just a minute? Whether we get on to another airline or pick this pilot over that isn't nearly as important as getting off the plane and having a real discussion of where we -- where we were and why we got on to this plane in the first place. What do you say? Let's get off. Let's stand there in front of the departure boards and see where all of the planes are headed and then ask ourselves do we even want to go."

Because right now, the parties and the airlines, the politicians, the pilots, they all say, "We have to do something," but what they're really saying is, "We have to fly. We have to fly somewhere." Maybe. Yes. Maybe no. But if we do get on a plane and we do fly, shouldn't we ask where?

The Reagan era is not a destination. It's merely a place we've already been. You can't go to the trip in Hawaii that you took with your parents as a little kid. But you can say Hawaii was a wonderful trip. And knowing what I experienced in Hawaii, do I want to go back, or is there some other place that's better?

The Reagan journey was a great one. Many of us remember it fondly. But we can't go back to that journey. We can remember that journey and learn from it.

The Constitution isn't a destination. It's a flight plan. It's an instrumentation system. It's waypoints.

Image: Rischgitz/Getty Images Image: Rischgitz/Getty Images

Maybe we find our way out of this mess, not by arguing over a pilot, but by beginning a discussion of our final destination. Does anybody even want to go there anymore? I mean, after all, we did get on this plane so very long ago.

I've heard talk of a shining city on a hill, but what does that even look like? Most of us I don't think have ever thought of where we're actually headed. Most of us are just trying to preserve what we have, what we have left. Most of us have spent our lives focused on the plane, the pilot, or the maps. Some are merely focusing on, "Why the hell are they in first class?" And, "That curtain is keeping me from something good." That curtain is only keeping you from the exit that is so very visible in times of trouble.

We've all been flying so long, and the cockpit door for this airline has been closed and locked. For so long, we've been on this plane. I honestly don't even know where we are anymore.

If we landed now, where would we be? If we were reasonable, we would land. We would then all get off the plane. We would look at the map to find out where we are. We'd explore our options. We'd look at the destination board. We would choose. We would look at the terrain. We would look at the weather ahead. And then we would begin to search for the best airline. Maybe we'd start a new one. Or we would decide the best way to go is in a car, a bus, to walk.

But I know this: The worst thing we can do is to continue to fight about the airline or the pilot. Only when we've decided on a destination can we find the right pilot that is experienced enough and has the right map to get us where we actually want to go.

Featured Image: Screenshot from The Glenn Beck Program

For the first time in the history of "The Glenn Beck Program," former President Donald Trump joined Glenn to give his take on America's direction under President Joe Biden compared to his own administration. He explained why Biden's horrific Afghanistan withdrawal was "not even a little bit" like his plan, and why he thinks it was "the most embarrassing event in the history of our country."

Plus, the former president gave his opinion on China's potential takeover of Bagram Air Base, the Pakistani Prime Minister, and Gen. Mark A. Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Glenn asked President Trump how similar the Biden administration's withdrawal from Afghanistan was to his administration's plan.

"Not even a little bit," Trump answered. "We had a great plan, but it was a very tenuous plan. It was based on many conditions. For instance, you can't kill American soldiers. ... You have to understand, I did want to get out. But I wanted to get out with dignity, and I wanted to take our equipment out. And I didn't want soldiers killed. ... What [Biden] did was just indefensible. He took the military out first and he left all the people. And then we became beggars to get the people out. I had a plan to get them out very quickly. But first, the Americans would go out."

Trump told Glenn that his plan included maintaining Bagram Air Base and explained why he would not have left "a single nail" behind in Afghanistan for the Taliban to seize.

"We were going to keep Bagram open," he explained. "We were never going to close that because, frankly, Bagram is more about China than it is about Afghanistan. It was practically on the other border of China. And now we've lost that. And you know who is taking it over? China is taking it over. We spend $10 billion to build that base. It's got the longest, most powerful runways in the world. And China has now got its representatives there and it looks like they'll take it over. Glenn, it's not believable what's happened. You know, they have Apache helicopters. These are really expensive weapons, and they have 28 of them. And they're brand-new. The latest model."

Glenn mentioned recent reports that Gen. Milley, America's top military officer, made "secret phone calls" to his counterpart in China while President Trump was in office.

"I learned early on that he was a dope," Trump said of Gen. Milley. "He made a statement to me — and I guarantee that's what happened to Biden — because I said, 'We're getting out of Afghanistan. We have to do it.' And I said, 'I want every nail. I want every screw. I want every bolt. I want every plane. I want every tank. I want it all out, down to the nails, screws, bolts ... I want every single thing. And he said, 'Sir, it's cheaper to leave it than it is to bring it.'

"The airplane might have cost $40 million, $50 million ... millions and millions of dollars. So, you think it's cheaper to leave it than to have 200 pilots fly over and fly all the equipment out? ... I said, you've got to be nuts. I mean, give me a tank of gas and a pilot and I just picked up a $40 million-dollar airplane. It was amazing. So, I learned early that this guy is a dope. But what he did, is he hurt our country ... and he shouldn't have been allowed to do it. And bad things should happen to him."

Watch the video clip below to catch more of the conversation or find the full interview on BlazeTV:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

In a shocking but underreported conversation ahead of the G7 Speakers' meeting in London last week, Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi admitted that the administration knows China is committing "genocide" against the Uyghurs in the Xinjiang region, but thinks working with the regime on climate change is more important.

On the radio program, an outraged Glenn Beck dissected Pelosi's speech and broke down how — along with the Biden administration's abandonment of Americans in Afghanistan, and the Democrat decision to follow measures of medical "equity" — the far left is revealing how little they really care about human life.

Glenn played a video clip of Pelosi making the following statement:

We've always felt connected to China, but with their military aggression in the South China Sea, with their continuation of genocide with the Uyghurs in Xinjiang province there, with their violation of the cultural, linguistic, religious priority of Tibet, with their suppression of democracy in Hong Kong and other parts of China, as well – they're just getting worse in terms of suppression, and freedom of speech. So, human rights, security, economically [sic].

Having said all of that ... we have to work together on climate. Climate is an overriding issue and China is the leading emitter in the world, the U.S. too and developed world too, but we must work together.

"We have Nancy Pelosi admitting the United States of America knows that they're not only committing [genocide], they're continuing to commit it. Which means, we've known for a while," Glenn noted. "And what does she say? She goes on to say, yes, they're committing genocide against the Uyghurs, but having said that, I'm quoting, 'the overriding issue,' is working together on climate change.

"Would we have worked with Hitler on climate change? Would we have worked with Hitler on developing the bomb? Would we have worked with Hitler on developing the Autobahn? Would we have worked with Hitler on his socialized medicine? Would we have worked with Hitler on any of his national, socialist ideas?" he asked.

"The answer is no. No. When you're committing genocide, no! She said 'we have to work together on climate,' because climate is the 'overriding issue.' The overriding issue? There is no way to describe this mindset. That, yes, they are killing an entire group of people because of their ethnicity or religion. They are systematically rounding them up, using them for slave labor, and killing them, using their organs and selling them on the open market. They are nothing more than cattle. For us to recognize it and do nothing about it is bad enough. But to say, 'we recognize it, but we have bigger things to talk to them about,' is a horror show."

Glenn went on to urge Americans to "stand up together in love, peace, and harmony," or risk watching our nation become the worst plague on human life yet.

Watch the video clip below to hear more from Glenn:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

The fall of Lehman Brothers in 2008 marked the largest bankruptcy filing in U.S. history and economic collapse was felt throughout the world. But now China's own version of Lehman Brothers, Evergrande, is teetering closer and closer to that edge, too. On the radio program Thursday, Glenn Beck gave the latest update and predicted how it will affect Asian markets and what it could mean for America's economy.

Glenn explained why he believes a major collapse that is happening now in China will have a cascading effect into a "controlled collapse," a managed decline that will dramatically change America's economy and the way we all live.

"You will not recognize your lifestyle. Hear me," Glenn warned. "And that's not a right-left thing. That's a right-wrong thing. We're on the wrong track. I'm telling you now, there's new information and you are not going to recognize the American lifestyle. ... It could happen tomorrow. It could happen in five years from now, but it will happen. We are headed for a very different country. One where you don't have the rights that you have. And you certainly don't have the economic privileges that Americans are used to."

"The same thing that happened in 2008 is now happening in China," Glenn continued. "This time, it's going to take everything down. When it collapses, it will take everything down."

Watch the video below to hear Glenn break down the details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Justin Haskins, editorial director of the Heartland Institute, joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to expose a shocking conversation between two Great Reset proponents — Klaus Schwab, chairman of the World Economic Forum, and Christine Lagarde, president of the European Central Bank (Europe's equivalent to the Fed).

The way Schwab and Lagarde discuss the role central banks should play in establishing societal norms, determining your way of life, and defending against potential crisis is proof that the Great Reset is upon us, Justin explained. And the scariest part is that they're not even trying to hide it. The entire, unbelievable conversation has been published on the WEF website, which you can read here.

Glenn read an excerpt from the conversation:

Christine Lagarde: At the ECB, we have now wrapped up and concluded our strategy review, which was the first one in 17 years. And I was blessed to have an entire Governing Council unanimously agree that the fight against climate change should be one of the considerations that we take when we determine monetary policy. So at least the European Central Bank is of the view that climate change is an important component in order to decide on monetary policy. ...

Can we arrive at that trade-off between fighting climate change, preserving biodiversity and yet securing enough growth to respond to legitimate demands of the population? And my first answer, Klaus, to be firm, is that to have a way of life, we need life. And in the medium term, we do have major threats on the horizon that could cause the death of hundreds of thousands of people. So we have to think life, first. We have to think way of life, second. ...

So we have to think life, first. We have to think way of life, second. How can we come together to make sure that we secure the first priority, which is life, and also protect the way of life that people have? And make sure that the cost of it is not so high for some people, that they just cannot tolerate it. I think that the trade-off that we reach will probably require some redistribution, because it is clear that the most exposed people, the less privileged people are those that are going to need some help.

"Do you understand, America, what that means?" Glenn exclaimed. "You have elites, that you never elected, that are having these meetings ... deciding what is a legitimate need for you. And telling you that your needs are going to go away in your lifetime. You may not see a time where you get wants again. Just your needs are going to be addressed. Am I reading this wrong?"

"This is absolutely what is being said here," Justin agreed. "She's very clear that we need to make sure that way of life is second to life. We have to save all these people, hundreds of thousands of people are going to die from this supposedly existential threat of climate change. And their wants, and their desires, and their quality of living, all of that has to come second."

"This is a central bank saying this. This is not an elected official, who is accountable directly to the people. This is a central bank saying, we're going to print money. We're going to use monetary policy, to impose these ideas, to rework society in order to accomplish our goals," Justin added, addressing Lagarde's call for "some redistribution."

Will Great Reset elites — not elected by the U.S. — soon be dictating to the rest of the world? Watch the video clip below to hear Glenn and Justin break it down:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.