Days of Rage: It's NOT Just Coming From the Left

We oftentimes in our country's history choose the wrong path. We always seem to get back on the right path eventually, but in the 1960s, before there was Kevlar, people were assassinated.

I told you yesterday that Donald Trump is now wearing a bullet-proof vest. He has Secret Service all over him. If this were 1968, would Donald Trump be alive today? I don't know.

Has our Secret Service stopped violence that we don't know of? Would Barack Obama be alive today? Would Ted Cruz be alive today? Would we be alive today?

That's the only thing stopping us from 1968 all over again --- the assassinations.

In 1968, a feminist went into Andy Warhol's art studio and gunned him down. A few months later, Robert F. Kennedy was gunned down. It was madness.

And there were people --- the Black Panthers, the Weather Underground, SDS -- the same group of people, really, they were planning for the convention, the Democratic Convention of 1968. And they were planning for a riot at the convention. The police were called, and Chicago streets were full of blood and violence.

Because I'm a student of history, I have been warning since, I think, around 2012. When was the first time I started saying 2016 would be 1968? I think around 2012.

I honestly thought it would come from the left. Who would have seen that the left and the right would actually both be responsible? The ones calling for the day of rage are twofold.

We have the Black Panthers, we have Occupy Wall Street and we also have the Muslim Brotherhood coordinating for their own summer violence and marches on the streets of America. That's all well documented, if anybody cares to look, but nobody in the media has looked.

On the other hand, we now have a super PAC of Donald Trump's speaking out. (I believe that Donald Trump is wrong when he says that Ted Cruz is managing his super PACs. You can't do that legally. I believe he's wrong when he says, "Well, they can go around those laws and they know exactly what's going on, and Ted Cruz can stop those super PACs when and if he wants to." That would be illegal.) But now Donald Trump's super PAC, headed by one of his close advisers --- a guy who was in the Nixon administration, a guy who studies and adores Saul Alinsky, a guy whose nickname is the Dirty Trickster, the guy who was there at Watergate, a guy who really has no principles whatsoever --- he's now running one of Donald Trump's super PACs. And he has started to promote the hashtag #daysofrage.

That's what Chicago was called in 1968. I can't believe that this is actually happening.

He's now been banned on MSNBC because of this. They won't give him any airtime, and we won't give him any airtime here. But I want you to hear what he is saying because we have a choice.

Now, people are saying that we're taking this out of context when I posted some of this stuff last night. They're saying we're taking it out of context. You decide for yourself. Here is Roger Stone on what he's planning this summer.

The fix is in. If Trump does not run the table on the rest of the primaries and the caucuses, we're looking at a very, very narrow path in which the kingmakers go all out to cheat, to steal, and to -- and to snatch this nomination from the candidate who is overwhelmingly selected by the voters, which is why I have urged Trump supporters: Come to Cleveland. March on Cleveland. Join us in the Forest City. We're going to have protests. Demonstrations. We will disclose the hotels and the room numbers of those delegates who are directly involved in this deal. If you're from Pennsylvania, we'll tell you who the culprits are. We urge you to visit their hotel and find them. You have a right to discuss this if you vote in the Pennsylvania primary, for example, and your votes are being disallowed.

In another cut, he talked about the big steal. He has dubbed this now "the big steal."

This is very Saul Alinsky, this is very Democrat, you know, you dub things. But it's also very Donald Trump, dubbing things --- little Marco, lying Ted --- to help you remember and to train you to think that way. They are now calling this the big steal, Roger Stone is. I don't know how you take that out of context. He is saying that he will give the hotel room numbers of the delegates and you go and you find them.

Now, he does say, "And talk to them." But everything else he's saying, I mean, do you think it's reasonable to give out not somebody's hotel, but their hotel room number and say, "Go get them and talk to them." If you are saying they're stealing something and these are the bad guys that are doing it to you, do you really think that they're going to talk to them?

Is this incitement? Or is this who we are? Is this who you are?

As I said to you a minute ago, this may be what we have been preparing for since 2008. No, I'm sorry. This is maybe, what I've been prepared for. This is what maybe I've been hearing. What I'm supposed to do, and I haven't understood it. And I've argued. This isn't a Martin Luther King movement. This isn't a Martin Luther King movement. I've said this over and over again. And you should hear my prayers. This isn't it. If you think you have it as bad as Martin Luther King did, you're fooling yourself.

But maybe that's not what his plan was. Maybe that's not what he was warning. Maybe he was just saying, "You're going to have to stand in the face of evil." Because I do believe Martin Luther King was right: When there is good versus evil and it is side by side, Americans will always side with good.

And this is not about a candidate. Make no mistake. This is not about a candidate. This isn't about Donald Trump. This is about good versus evil.

I'm wondering if we're supposed to go to Cleveland ourselves. And I don't know what yet --- ring those hotels, stand someplace, arm in arm, shoulder to shoulder, and be immovable. And let them punch us in the face. Let them be violent. Let them be whoever they have to be. And we show that Americans aren't that way. We're not part of that. As they go try to destroy things, shouldn't somebody be standing up and ringing the police? No matter if they're Trump delegates or Kasich delegates or Cruz delegates, but making sure that somebody is standing up in the way. Because, you know, yesterday's monologue was just do it. It was a reminder that nothing happens unless you do it.

This isn't somebody else's battle. The American Revolution was the battle of the farmers. The farmers came up. And many people said, "Who are you to go and pick up a gun against the strongest army in the world?" Well, I believe in this. I don't know. I'm saying this out loud. I'm just thinking out loud. I'm not saying we're going.

I have an advantage. I've never swung a fist before. I'm such a girl, I might pull your hair. But in any fist fight, I lose. I don't even know how to try. So it's easy for me to be nonviolent in a crowd because I'll be cowering and getting hit in the face and there's nothing I can do about it. That's why Martin Luther King trained people. And I don't know if any of us have the discipline to do it. I don't know if anybody truly has the discipline to not swing back.

But what is the point? The point is not to go and stop them and beat them at their own game, the point is to show the difference between good and evil. That's what Martin Luther King was doing. Martin Luther King was showing that we don't have to be this way, and these are the bad guys. We're not the bad guys.

There were those trying to make Martin Luther King look like the revolutionary, look like the bad guy. But when his people stood there --- men and women, preachers, pastors, rabbis --- all stood there and they just took it, they took the fire hose, they took the dogs, they took the beatings with the sticks, and America knew. These were not the bad guys.

And right now, America doesn't know who are the bad guys and the good guys. Nobody knows. Everybody says they're the good guy. Everybody says that. The only way you know who the good guys are in a society like this is to make a very bold statement.

Boy, this is going to be really unpopular. I'm not suggesting we're going to do this. I've been saying for how many months . . . that I think we're going to end up in Cleveland doing something like this. So I just had that feeling, but it didn't make sense until I heard Roger Stone say this yesterday.

Perhaps this is why we went to Birmingham last year. Remember, a lot of that didn't make sense. When I said, "We all have to march together." And remember I said, "We have to have some discipline on this?" And everybody was like, "Glenn, it's just a march down the street." And I'm like, "I know. But it will make sense at some point." Maybe it's this point. And as I said at the beginning, I hope so. Because if it's not, guys, how much worse does it have to get before we stand up?

Featured Image: Screenshot from The Glenn Beck Program.

Fox News host Greg Gutfeld joined Glenn on "The Glenn Beck Podcast" this week to talk about his new book, "The Plus: Self-Help for People Who Hate Self-Help."

Greg admits he is probably the last person who should write a self-help book. Nevertheless, he offers his offbeat advice on how to save America during what has become one of the most tumultuous times in history, as well as drinking while tweeting (spoiler: don't do it).

He also shares his "evolution" on President Donald Trump, his prediction for the election, and what it means to be an agnostic-atheist.

In this clip, Greg shares what he calls his "first great epiphany" on how dangerous cancel culture has become.

"I believe that cancel culture is the first successful work-around of the First Amendment," he said. "Because freedom of speech doesn't protect me from my career being ruined, my livelihood being destroyed, or me getting so depressed I commit suicide. Cancel culture is the first successful work-around of freedom of speech. It can oppress your speech with the scepter of destruction. We don't have freedom of speech anymore."

Watch the video clip below or find the full Glenn Beck Podcast with Greg Gutfeld here.

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Use code UNMASKED to save $20 on one year of BlazeTV.

Dr. Simone Gold joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Thursday to set the record straight about hydroxychloroquine -- what it is, how it works, and the real reason for all the current controversy surrounding a centuries-old medication.

Dr. Gold is a board certified emergency physician. She graduated from Chicago Medical School before attending Stanford University Law School. She completed her residency in emergency medicine at Stony Brook University Hospital in New York, and worked in Washington D.C. for the Surgeon General, as well for the chairman of the Committee on Labor and Human Resources. She works as an emergency physician on the front lines, whether or not there is a pandemic, and her clinical work serves all Americans from urban inner city to suburban and the Native American population. Her legal practice focuses on policy issues relating to law and medicine.

She is also the founder of America's frontline doctors, a group of doctors who have been under attack this week for speaking out about hydroxychloroquine during a news conference held outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington D.C.

On the program, Dr. Gold emphasized that the controversy over hydroxychloroquine is a "complete myth."

"Hydroxychloroquine is an analogue or a derivative of quinine, which is found in tree bark. It's the most noncontroversial of medications that there is," she explained.

"It's been around for centuries and it's been FDA-approved in the modern version, called hydroxychloroquine, for 65 years. In all of that time, [doctors] used it for breast-feeding women, pregnant women, elderly, children, and immune compromised. The typical use is for years or even decades because we give it mostly to RA, rheumatoid arthritis patients and lupus patients who need to be on it, essentially, all of their life. So, we have extensive experience with it ... it's one of the most commonly used medications throughout the world."

Dr. Gold told Glenn she was surprised when the media suddenly "vomited all over hydroxychloroquine", but initially chalked it up to the left's predictable hatred for anything President Donald Trump endorses. However, when the media gave the drug Remdesivir glowing reviews, despite disappointing clinical trial results, she decided to do some research.

"[Remdesivir] certainly wasn't a fabulous drug, but the media coverage was all about how fabulous it was. At that moment, I thought that was really weird. Because it's one thing to hate hydroxychloroquine because the president [endorsed] it. But it's another thing to give a free pass to another medicine that doesn't seem that great. I thought that was really weird, so I started looking into it. And let me tell you, what I discovered was absolutely shocking," she said.

Watch the video below for more details:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

According to the mainstream media's COVID-19 narrative, the president is "ignoring" the crisis.

On tonight's "Glenn TV" special, Glenn Beck exposes the media's last four months of political theater that has helped shape America's confusion and fear over coronavirus. And now, with a new school year looming on the horizon, the ongoing hysteria has enormous ramifications for our children, but the media is working overtime to paint the Trump administration as anti-science Neanderthals who want to send children and teachers off to die by reopening schools.

Glenn fights back with the facts and interviews the medical doctor Big Tech fears the most. Dr. Simone Gold, founder of America's Frontline Doctors, stands up to the media's smear campaign and explains why she could no longer stay silent in her fight against coronavirus fear.

Watch a preview below:


In order to watch tonight's episode, you must be a BlazeTV subscriber. Join today to get a 30-day free trial, and get $20 off a one-year subscription with code UNMASKED.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

It's high time to leave the partisan politics behind and focus on the facts about face masks and whether or not they really work against COVID-19.

On the radio program Tuesday, Glenn Beck spoke with Drs. Scott Jensen and George Rutherford about the scientific evidence that proves or disproves the effectiveness of mask wearing to stop the spread of the coronavirus. Then, Dr. Karyln Borysenko joined to break down where the massive political divide over masks came from in the first place.

"I think if we were to talk about this a couple months ago, I might have said, 'Well, there's the science of masks, and there's the emotions of masks.' But, unfortunately, there's something in between," Jensen said. "I would have thought that the science of masks would have to do with the physics of masks, so I did a video a couple months ago where I talked about the pore side of a cotton mask or a surgical mask."

He explained that properly worn masks can help reduce the spread of virus particles, but cautioned against a false-sense of security when wearing a mask because they are far from providing complete protection.

"If you have a triple-ply mask, the pore size will end up being effectively five microns. And five microns, to a COVID-19 virus particle, is 50 times larger. That's approximately the same differential between the two-inch separation between the wires of a chain-link fence, and a gnat," Jensen explained.

"But now what we're seeing is if we have some collision of COVID-19 viral particles with the latticework of any mask ... if you're breathing out or breathing in and the viral particles collide with the actual latticework of a mask, I think intuitively, yes, we can reduce the amount of virus particles that are going back and forth."

Dr. Rutherford said masks are essential tools for fighting COVID-19, as long as you wear them correctly. He laid out the three main reasons he believes we should all be wearing masks.

"So, we're trying to do three things," he said. "First of all, we're trying to protect the people around you, in case you are one of the 60% of people who have asymptomatic infection and don't know it. The second thing we're trying to do is to protect you. The third thing we're trying to do is, if you get infected, you'll get infected at a lower dose, and then you're less likely to develop symptoms. That's the threefer."

Watch the video below to catch more of the conversation:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.