Days of Rage: It's NOT Just Coming From the Left

We oftentimes in our country's history choose the wrong path. We always seem to get back on the right path eventually, but in the 1960s, before there was Kevlar, people were assassinated.

I told you yesterday that Donald Trump is now wearing a bullet-proof vest. He has Secret Service all over him. If this were 1968, would Donald Trump be alive today? I don't know.

Has our Secret Service stopped violence that we don't know of? Would Barack Obama be alive today? Would Ted Cruz be alive today? Would we be alive today?

That's the only thing stopping us from 1968 all over again --- the assassinations.

In 1968, a feminist went into Andy Warhol's art studio and gunned him down. A few months later, Robert F. Kennedy was gunned down. It was madness.

And there were people --- the Black Panthers, the Weather Underground, SDS -- the same group of people, really, they were planning for the convention, the Democratic Convention of 1968. And they were planning for a riot at the convention. The police were called, and Chicago streets were full of blood and violence.

Because I'm a student of history, I have been warning since, I think, around 2012. When was the first time I started saying 2016 would be 1968? I think around 2012.

I honestly thought it would come from the left. Who would have seen that the left and the right would actually both be responsible? The ones calling for the day of rage are twofold.

We have the Black Panthers, we have Occupy Wall Street and we also have the Muslim Brotherhood coordinating for their own summer violence and marches on the streets of America. That's all well documented, if anybody cares to look, but nobody in the media has looked.

On the other hand, we now have a super PAC of Donald Trump's speaking out. (I believe that Donald Trump is wrong when he says that Ted Cruz is managing his super PACs. You can't do that legally. I believe he's wrong when he says, "Well, they can go around those laws and they know exactly what's going on, and Ted Cruz can stop those super PACs when and if he wants to." That would be illegal.) But now Donald Trump's super PAC, headed by one of his close advisers --- a guy who was in the Nixon administration, a guy who studies and adores Saul Alinsky, a guy whose nickname is the Dirty Trickster, the guy who was there at Watergate, a guy who really has no principles whatsoever --- he's now running one of Donald Trump's super PACs. And he has started to promote the hashtag #daysofrage.

That's what Chicago was called in 1968. I can't believe that this is actually happening.

He's now been banned on MSNBC because of this. They won't give him any airtime, and we won't give him any airtime here. But I want you to hear what he is saying because we have a choice.

Now, people are saying that we're taking this out of context when I posted some of this stuff last night. They're saying we're taking it out of context. You decide for yourself. Here is Roger Stone on what he's planning this summer.

The fix is in. If Trump does not run the table on the rest of the primaries and the caucuses, we're looking at a very, very narrow path in which the kingmakers go all out to cheat, to steal, and to -- and to snatch this nomination from the candidate who is overwhelmingly selected by the voters, which is why I have urged Trump supporters: Come to Cleveland. March on Cleveland. Join us in the Forest City. We're going to have protests. Demonstrations. We will disclose the hotels and the room numbers of those delegates who are directly involved in this deal. If you're from Pennsylvania, we'll tell you who the culprits are. We urge you to visit their hotel and find them. You have a right to discuss this if you vote in the Pennsylvania primary, for example, and your votes are being disallowed.

In another cut, he talked about the big steal. He has dubbed this now "the big steal."

This is very Saul Alinsky, this is very Democrat, you know, you dub things. But it's also very Donald Trump, dubbing things --- little Marco, lying Ted --- to help you remember and to train you to think that way. They are now calling this the big steal, Roger Stone is. I don't know how you take that out of context. He is saying that he will give the hotel room numbers of the delegates and you go and you find them.

Now, he does say, "And talk to them." But everything else he's saying, I mean, do you think it's reasonable to give out not somebody's hotel, but their hotel room number and say, "Go get them and talk to them." If you are saying they're stealing something and these are the bad guys that are doing it to you, do you really think that they're going to talk to them?

Is this incitement? Or is this who we are? Is this who you are?

As I said to you a minute ago, this may be what we have been preparing for since 2008. No, I'm sorry. This is maybe, what I've been prepared for. This is what maybe I've been hearing. What I'm supposed to do, and I haven't understood it. And I've argued. This isn't a Martin Luther King movement. This isn't a Martin Luther King movement. I've said this over and over again. And you should hear my prayers. This isn't it. If you think you have it as bad as Martin Luther King did, you're fooling yourself.

But maybe that's not what his plan was. Maybe that's not what he was warning. Maybe he was just saying, "You're going to have to stand in the face of evil." Because I do believe Martin Luther King was right: When there is good versus evil and it is side by side, Americans will always side with good.

And this is not about a candidate. Make no mistake. This is not about a candidate. This isn't about Donald Trump. This is about good versus evil.

I'm wondering if we're supposed to go to Cleveland ourselves. And I don't know what yet --- ring those hotels, stand someplace, arm in arm, shoulder to shoulder, and be immovable. And let them punch us in the face. Let them be violent. Let them be whoever they have to be. And we show that Americans aren't that way. We're not part of that. As they go try to destroy things, shouldn't somebody be standing up and ringing the police? No matter if they're Trump delegates or Kasich delegates or Cruz delegates, but making sure that somebody is standing up in the way. Because, you know, yesterday's monologue was just do it. It was a reminder that nothing happens unless you do it.

This isn't somebody else's battle. The American Revolution was the battle of the farmers. The farmers came up. And many people said, "Who are you to go and pick up a gun against the strongest army in the world?" Well, I believe in this. I don't know. I'm saying this out loud. I'm just thinking out loud. I'm not saying we're going.

I have an advantage. I've never swung a fist before. I'm such a girl, I might pull your hair. But in any fist fight, I lose. I don't even know how to try. So it's easy for me to be nonviolent in a crowd because I'll be cowering and getting hit in the face and there's nothing I can do about it. That's why Martin Luther King trained people. And I don't know if any of us have the discipline to do it. I don't know if anybody truly has the discipline to not swing back.

But what is the point? The point is not to go and stop them and beat them at their own game, the point is to show the difference between good and evil. That's what Martin Luther King was doing. Martin Luther King was showing that we don't have to be this way, and these are the bad guys. We're not the bad guys.

There were those trying to make Martin Luther King look like the revolutionary, look like the bad guy. But when his people stood there --- men and women, preachers, pastors, rabbis --- all stood there and they just took it, they took the fire hose, they took the dogs, they took the beatings with the sticks, and America knew. These were not the bad guys.

And right now, America doesn't know who are the bad guys and the good guys. Nobody knows. Everybody says they're the good guy. Everybody says that. The only way you know who the good guys are in a society like this is to make a very bold statement.

Boy, this is going to be really unpopular. I'm not suggesting we're going to do this. I've been saying for how many months . . . that I think we're going to end up in Cleveland doing something like this. So I just had that feeling, but it didn't make sense until I heard Roger Stone say this yesterday.

Perhaps this is why we went to Birmingham last year. Remember, a lot of that didn't make sense. When I said, "We all have to march together." And remember I said, "We have to have some discipline on this?" And everybody was like, "Glenn, it's just a march down the street." And I'm like, "I know. But it will make sense at some point." Maybe it's this point. And as I said at the beginning, I hope so. Because if it's not, guys, how much worse does it have to get before we stand up?

Featured Image: Screenshot from The Glenn Beck Program.

For the first time in the history of "The Glenn Beck Program," former President Donald Trump joined Glenn to give his take on America's direction under President Joe Biden compared to his own administration. He explained why Biden's horrific Afghanistan withdrawal was "not even a little bit" like his plan, and why he thinks it was "the most embarrassing event in the history of our country."

Plus, the former president gave his opinion on China's potential takeover of Bagram Air Base, the Pakistani Prime Minister, and Gen. Mark A. Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Glenn asked President Trump how similar the Biden administration's withdrawal from Afghanistan was to his administration's plan.

"Not even a little bit," Trump answered. "We had a great plan, but it was a very tenuous plan. It was based on many conditions. For instance, you can't kill American soldiers. ... You have to understand, I did want to get out. But I wanted to get out with dignity, and I wanted to take our equipment out. And I didn't want soldiers killed. ... What [Biden] did was just indefensible. He took the military out first and he left all the people. And then we became beggars to get the people out. I had a plan to get them out very quickly. But first, the Americans would go out."

Trump told Glenn that his plan included maintaining Bagram Air Base and explained why he would not have left "a single nail" behind in Afghanistan for the Taliban to seize.

"We were going to keep Bagram open," he explained. "We were never going to close that because, frankly, Bagram is more about China than it is about Afghanistan. It was practically on the other border of China. And now we've lost that. And you know who is taking it over? China is taking it over. We spend $10 billion to build that base. It's got the longest, most powerful runways in the world. And China has now got its representatives there and it looks like they'll take it over. Glenn, it's not believable what's happened. You know, they have Apache helicopters. These are really expensive weapons, and they have 28 of them. And they're brand-new. The latest model."

Glenn mentioned recent reports that Gen. Milley, America's top military officer, made "secret phone calls" to his counterpart in China while President Trump was in office.

"I learned early on that he was a dope," Trump said of Gen. Milley. "He made a statement to me — and I guarantee that's what happened to Biden — because I said, 'We're getting out of Afghanistan. We have to do it.' And I said, 'I want every nail. I want every screw. I want every bolt. I want every plane. I want every tank. I want it all out, down to the nails, screws, bolts ... I want every single thing. And he said, 'Sir, it's cheaper to leave it than it is to bring it.'

"The airplane might have cost $40 million, $50 million ... millions and millions of dollars. So, you think it's cheaper to leave it than to have 200 pilots fly over and fly all the equipment out? ... I said, you've got to be nuts. I mean, give me a tank of gas and a pilot and I just picked up a $40 million-dollar airplane. It was amazing. So, I learned early that this guy is a dope. But what he did, is he hurt our country ... and he shouldn't have been allowed to do it. And bad things should happen to him."

Watch the video clip below to catch more of the conversation or find the full interview on BlazeTV:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

In a shocking but underreported conversation ahead of the G7 Speakers' meeting in London last week, Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi admitted that the administration knows China is committing "genocide" against the Uyghurs in the Xinjiang region, but thinks working with the regime on climate change is more important.

On the radio program, an outraged Glenn Beck dissected Pelosi's speech and broke down how — along with the Biden administration's abandonment of Americans in Afghanistan, and the Democrat decision to follow measures of medical "equity" — the far left is revealing how little they really care about human life.

Glenn played a video clip of Pelosi making the following statement:

We've always felt connected to China, but with their military aggression in the South China Sea, with their continuation of genocide with the Uyghurs in Xinjiang province there, with their violation of the cultural, linguistic, religious priority of Tibet, with their suppression of democracy in Hong Kong and other parts of China, as well – they're just getting worse in terms of suppression, and freedom of speech. So, human rights, security, economically [sic].

Having said all of that ... we have to work together on climate. Climate is an overriding issue and China is the leading emitter in the world, the U.S. too and developed world too, but we must work together.

"We have Nancy Pelosi admitting the United States of America knows that they're not only committing [genocide], they're continuing to commit it. Which means, we've known for a while," Glenn noted. "And what does she say? She goes on to say, yes, they're committing genocide against the Uyghurs, but having said that, I'm quoting, 'the overriding issue,' is working together on climate change.

"Would we have worked with Hitler on climate change? Would we have worked with Hitler on developing the bomb? Would we have worked with Hitler on developing the Autobahn? Would we have worked with Hitler on his socialized medicine? Would we have worked with Hitler on any of his national, socialist ideas?" he asked.

"The answer is no. No. When you're committing genocide, no! She said 'we have to work together on climate,' because climate is the 'overriding issue.' The overriding issue? There is no way to describe this mindset. That, yes, they are killing an entire group of people because of their ethnicity or religion. They are systematically rounding them up, using them for slave labor, and killing them, using their organs and selling them on the open market. They are nothing more than cattle. For us to recognize it and do nothing about it is bad enough. But to say, 'we recognize it, but we have bigger things to talk to them about,' is a horror show."

Glenn went on to urge Americans to "stand up together in love, peace, and harmony," or risk watching our nation become the worst plague on human life yet.

Watch the video clip below to hear more from Glenn:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

The fall of Lehman Brothers in 2008 marked the largest bankruptcy filing in U.S. history and economic collapse was felt throughout the world. But now China's own version of Lehman Brothers, Evergrande, is teetering closer and closer to that edge, too. On the radio program Thursday, Glenn Beck gave the latest update and predicted how it will affect Asian markets and what it could mean for America's economy.

Glenn explained why he believes a major collapse that is happening now in China will have a cascading effect into a "controlled collapse," a managed decline that will dramatically change America's economy and the way we all live.

"You will not recognize your lifestyle. Hear me," Glenn warned. "And that's not a right-left thing. That's a right-wrong thing. We're on the wrong track. I'm telling you now, there's new information and you are not going to recognize the American lifestyle. ... It could happen tomorrow. It could happen in five years from now, but it will happen. We are headed for a very different country. One where you don't have the rights that you have. And you certainly don't have the economic privileges that Americans are used to."

"The same thing that happened in 2008 is now happening in China," Glenn continued. "This time, it's going to take everything down. When it collapses, it will take everything down."

Watch the video below to hear Glenn break down the details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Justin Haskins, editorial director of the Heartland Institute, joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to expose a shocking conversation between two Great Reset proponents — Klaus Schwab, chairman of the World Economic Forum, and Christine Lagarde, president of the European Central Bank (Europe's equivalent to the Fed).

The way Schwab and Lagarde discuss the role central banks should play in establishing societal norms, determining your way of life, and defending against potential crisis is proof that the Great Reset is upon us, Justin explained. And the scariest part is that they're not even trying to hide it. The entire, unbelievable conversation has been published on the WEF website, which you can read here.

Glenn read an excerpt from the conversation:

Christine Lagarde: At the ECB, we have now wrapped up and concluded our strategy review, which was the first one in 17 years. And I was blessed to have an entire Governing Council unanimously agree that the fight against climate change should be one of the considerations that we take when we determine monetary policy. So at least the European Central Bank is of the view that climate change is an important component in order to decide on monetary policy. ...

Can we arrive at that trade-off between fighting climate change, preserving biodiversity and yet securing enough growth to respond to legitimate demands of the population? And my first answer, Klaus, to be firm, is that to have a way of life, we need life. And in the medium term, we do have major threats on the horizon that could cause the death of hundreds of thousands of people. So we have to think life, first. We have to think way of life, second. ...

So we have to think life, first. We have to think way of life, second. How can we come together to make sure that we secure the first priority, which is life, and also protect the way of life that people have? And make sure that the cost of it is not so high for some people, that they just cannot tolerate it. I think that the trade-off that we reach will probably require some redistribution, because it is clear that the most exposed people, the less privileged people are those that are going to need some help.

"Do you understand, America, what that means?" Glenn exclaimed. "You have elites, that you never elected, that are having these meetings ... deciding what is a legitimate need for you. And telling you that your needs are going to go away in your lifetime. You may not see a time where you get wants again. Just your needs are going to be addressed. Am I reading this wrong?"

"This is absolutely what is being said here," Justin agreed. "She's very clear that we need to make sure that way of life is second to life. We have to save all these people, hundreds of thousands of people are going to die from this supposedly existential threat of climate change. And their wants, and their desires, and their quality of living, all of that has to come second."

"This is a central bank saying this. This is not an elected official, who is accountable directly to the people. This is a central bank saying, we're going to print money. We're going to use monetary policy, to impose these ideas, to rework society in order to accomplish our goals," Justin added, addressing Lagarde's call for "some redistribution."

Will Great Reset elites — not elected by the U.S. — soon be dictating to the rest of the world? Watch the video clip below to hear Glenn and Justin break it down:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.