The Next Two Generations Will Achieve a Very Different American Dream

From my speech at Politicon on June 25, 2016 in Pasadena, CA. This post originally appeared on Medium.

If you were to write a letter that would be given to your grandchildren 30 or 40 years in the future, what would your message be? Looking at the world today, maybe you’d write a letter of apology: “I’m sorry we screwed up the environment and melted the ice caps.”

Maybe you’d write a letter of warning: “Hey, watch out for Islam,” or “Stay away from gluten, sugar, meat, fluoride and sitting. (Oh, and Matthew McConaughey movies.)”

If your grandparents had written you a letter before you were born, what would they have told you?

• “Watch out for Communism.”

• “Stay away from drugs and rock ‘n roll.”

• “Make love, not war.”

• “If anyone offers you the chance to wear bell-bottom jeans, the answer is no!”

I would have loved for my grandparents to write me a letter. Even though the issues of their day included the Cold War, hippies, drugs and Communism, that would have been an empty letter because that’s not who they were. I think they would have told me about the life lessons they had learned — the things they found true, what they lived by, what got them through.

RELATED: A Letter to My Grandchildren: My Legacy to Them

Life is all about principles. We all change, but life is about principles. That’s what I wished they had told me.

Let’s take the Woodstock generation. Their message was: “Don’t trust anybody over the age of 30.” Why? Because those people had sold their souls for power and money — for a suit or a job — and they didn’t want to become that.

Now, our nation is being ruled by members of that Woodstock generation. Have they held true to their principles? If they had written a letter to themselves back then, would they be ashamed of who they have become? Have they created the authentic world they advocated — with love, no greed, no war?

1-V8Iuas9ZPm3mEQFBV_I7zw

A group of people listen to music at Woodstock Music and Arts Fair in August 1969. (Three Lions/Getty Images)

That Woodstock generation is now about 70 years old — Clinton, Trump, Sanders. Would they have pointed to their future selves and said, “Yeah I can trust that guy.” I don’t think so. I think they’d be doing sit-ins and marches every day. What legacy did they leave us?

Pew Research released a study last week, which found 70% of Democrats feel fear when they think about Republicans. A decade ago, only about 20% of voters felt the other party was a danger to the country. Today, it’s 60% overall.

What happened to us?

Certainly the Woodstock generation wouldn’t have wanted this much anger and distrust among their grandchildren. It’s an interesting space to be in — one I have been in for years.

1-v0rBtB7BKB5htz99ZA_AIg

Revelers attend 40th Anniversary of Woodstock Music Festival on August 14, 2009 in Bethel, New York. (Mario Tama/Getty Images)

For instance, how many people believe I am opposed to gay marriage being legal in this country? How many would be surprised to know I consider Anderson Cooper to be an honest journalist and happily count him among my friends?

This dilemma is now affecting all of us. Do you feel comfortable giving yourself the label of Democrat or Republican? How many people consider themselves Independent?

Do the issues of our day — the ones you hear in the media — do they define your focus? Do they define you?

• Income inequality

• Transgender bathrooms

• Cyber bullying

• Islamic terror

• Gun crime

Do these issues play a role in your legacy? Are any of these who you are? Or are they like the message, “Watch out for Communists,” from my grandparents? Perhaps they play a role in your life — and they may indeed be very important to you — but do they define you?

Think ahead to the next 10, 20, 30 years — what do you see? Do you believe there will be a World War? A global financial collapse or depression? How about the cure for cancer? How about the Cubs winning the World Series? (Hope springs eternal...)

1-eAvLUYV_6pZDLDBOl7gS_w

A money exchange office worker poses with handfuls of Sterling notes and Euro notes on June 7, 2016 in Ireland. (PAUL FAITH/AFP/Getty Images)

Nobody knows if or when any of this is going to happen — and we could debate it all day long — but have you noticed the more important something is, the less we debate it?

A depression, a currency collapse, would affect all of us. Is anybody talking about it?

Do you believe you will never die?

There are people right now who are saying that by 2030, they will have conquered death — nobody will ever need to die again. Think about that one a little. What happens to Social Security then?

According to futurists like Ray Kurzweil, many of the people reading this may never die. Every generation prior to Gen Y has faced death as the inevitable conclusion to life, but Millennials may be the first to experience the ability to live, well, forever.

So we need to have some discussions.

Would you even want to live forever if you could? Your consciousness, or your unique pattern, could be saved to a computer. Is that life? And, if it is, is there any value to the human body? Is any life worth fighting for if it can just always be patterned and stored on a thumb drive?

We could become the first species on earth for whom death becomes optional, and life is separate from the body.

Think about what that might mean for us as a culture, what it would mean for politics. Would war cease to exist? Hate? Racism? Fear? Or would they just get worse?

Will technology take us to utopia or the nightmare of science fiction? Will we let it? Should we let it?

What does it mean to be human? What motivates us — love, fear, hatred, revenge, greed, hunger, sex? What if I told you technology could take away many of those appetites.

Shouldn’t we be having these discussions?

1-KRC7rC5cWhHbGftUcp3MXQ

Attendees walk by image of Microsoft HoloLens augmented reality viewer during the 2016 Microsoft Build Developer Conference on March 30, 2016 in San Francisco, California. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Zuckerberg says that by 2050 sex will be virtual and procreation done in labs. We could be living in the Matrix. Is that life? Is that just living? Is that even reality or just illusion?

How can we connect with each other, especially when the media and politics is built entirely around driving us apart, and technology encourages us to text, even when we’re next to each other?

Listening to the news these days, regardless of the source, it’s becoming an exercise in degrees of hatred, judgment, fear and blame. This is the language and approach of the last generation and the ones previous to that. Meanwhile, politics is merely varying degrees of lying from both sides, and we just end up arguing over misdirection.

The next two generations to come of age will bear a great burden — one that is not a choice of their own making. It is a burden that, I am sad to say, was left by my generation and many of the generations that came before. But we have the opportunity to enter a new Golden age for humanity — especially in America.

Technology is rapidly advancing and has the power to fundamentally transform our civilization. How will we use it? The internet of everything will bring about the democratization of everything. And that means the destruction of the old institutions — from a place where the game is rigged to favor the elite to a place where any one person can literally change the world.

1-Vy0luj7ArX_WFMnJUSDBGw

People use Samsung Gear VR during the presentation of the new Samsung Galaxy S7 and Samsung Galaxy S7 edge on February 21, 2016 in Barcelona, Spain. (David Ramos/Getty Images)

Up until now the ability to survive, achieve status and pass on your DNA has been based on your ability to accumulate power. Who has the most wealth, land, oil, water?

The future is being shaped by those under thirty. They look at the concept of staying at a job for 40 years and getting a gold watch upon retirement as an embarrassment, not a badge of honor. They believe they can be the next Zuckerberg or Dorsey or Musk.

Now is the time of the straight line. Friction is being diminished. The path of less resistance is how real freedom, real power can be found. Soon, nothing will be as it was and everything will be as it has never been.

The last two generations tried to homogenize everything — gentrification. A Starbucks on every corner, GAP, Anne Taylor, CVS. U.S. retail (the big box stores like Macy’s) lost $400 million just in their clothing lines during Q1 this year.

The day of the mall is over. But so is the day of the automobile.

We think of GM as a car maker. But they aren’t, they are a bank. The money-making part of GM is GMAC. Forget about making a better car, the next generation doesn’t even want to own a car. You can share cars. So what happens to profits when people want to share cars? Even with Uber, someone needs to own a vehicle.

By 2030, human-driven cars will be a thing of the past, and it will be shared ownership of cars. We’ll be in a shared ownership community. The malls will be gone, taxis will be gone, Ubers will be gone, and cars will be made by robots.

1-gKR0IHy7EAvRr6c9dGDATA

A self-driving Mercedes Benz F 015 stands at the Dam Square in Amsterdam on March 13, 2016. (BART MAAT/AFP/Getty Images)

By 2050, over 50% of current jobs won’t exist. Our world will be so vastly different. How do we get there without fascism, revolutions or an American Spring? We will get there by rediscovering:

• Sharing

• Listening to each other

• Protecting each other

• Empowering the individual — not the government or corporations

• Working together

• Individuality

• Live and let live

• Classic liberalism

Ah, but that is where we fall apart. I could say half of those things to Democrats and they would cheer. I could say the other half of them to Republicans and they would cheer. But the sovereignty of the individual is only possible with personal responsibility and mutual respect.

Sharing and cooperation only works if it is voluntary. By definition, cooperation cannot be coerced. It doesn’t come from laws or from the point of a gun.

Cooperation by force is called slavery.

The next generation is bringing authenticity back into vogue. Finding their own true selves and getting to live in peace while letting others live their authentic selves. This is the revolution the Woodstock generation said they believed in but never delivered. The younger generation and the ones that follow won’t be defined by structures and words. Technology enables this. It can change world from top-down to bottom-up.

The “old guard” is panicked about this.

1-YFTUjsvA7AWv4PxurRTIMg

Guards pose in ceremonial attire at Wellington Barracks, March 21, 2012 in London, England. (Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)

Change is hard. Just think about self-driving cars and trucks. With fractional ownership, car sales plummet, insurance plummets, auto repair disappears. While unions are fighting for what they believe are their rights, they are missing the real issues and the opportunities coming down the pipe.

People are talking about minimum wage, but McDonalds says the only way to survive is by replacing workers with robots. So, how does the government respond? In the EU, they are now asking robots to pay social security taxes. That is how the establishment fights the progress they fear.

Look at who they’ve rolled out, both right and left, for this presidential election. They will use anything they can to hold onto their power:

• Build walls!

• Get the guns!

• Free college for everybody!

• Ban Muslims!

• Spy on people!

• More spending, more debt, more war, because everything is a threat!

How sad. What a joke they have become. A civil rights sit-in with people like John Lewis. He fought for the rights of others, but now leads a movement to limit the rights of citizens, repressing the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th Amendments.

1-SEDtVIH6PR52lvwoJ59Q-g

Rep. John Lewis (D-GA), (3rd L), James Clyburn (D-SC), Maxine Waters (D-CA) and Charles Rangel, (D-NY), right, speak with supporters outside the U.S. Capitol building June 23, 2016 in Washington, DC. (Allison Shelley/Getty Images)

The political class — the elites — will resist the next age forcefully, with all they have. The disruptions we’ll see over the next 30 years will be catastrophic to some very powerful forces. Governments, banks, corporations, unions and industries with GDPs larger than most nations will crumble. Currencies will become obsolete. And these institutions will hold on until their last dying breath.

The church resisted the Age of Enlightenment because it threatened the status quo. It threatened its power.

What do you think Monsanto will do when prime beef can be grown in a lab and 3D printed? Either they will buy up the beef industry and push for regulation of 3D printers, or they will buy up the 3D printing companies and lobby for regulations on the beef industry.

America makes up 4% of the world’s population, but we consume 45% of the prescription drugs and 80% of the world’s anti-depressants. What will drug manufacturers will do when DNA sequencing and stem cell generation cure all diseases?

What will the oil industry do when Elon Musk masters cold fusion?

What will the utility companies do when he or Apple masters the solar battery?

What will funeral homes and cemeteries do when Kurzweil and Thiel cure death like a disease — when the body is merely a flawed machine that can be disposed of or replaced, having nothing to do with the definition of life?

All of these questions will have to be answered. And many of you will be alive to see it happen.

The most urgent question is this:

Will you be the one helping to set the new design, or just living within the framework of rules somebody else built? Will you be a free man or a slave?

The Baby Boomers and Gen X grew up under the shadow of the nuclear build-up. In the years following the Cuban Missile Crisis, 25% of new homes included bomb shelters.

1-ePdj2YcWDk6F6EdMDF_eBQ

Illustration of a family building a bomb fallout shelter together, from a U.S. Department of Defense publication, 1961. (Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

Since World War II, we have believed nuclear bombs were the ultimate weapon, the ultimate way to destroy. But social media has proved that isn’t true. A bomb does not destroy a civilization. That’s not what is being used to destroy ours.

The two greatest weapons in the information age — available to governments, corporations and the media — are fear and shame.

Fear is how you blind people, get them to surrender their freedom, hand it over to pay for the safety you promise them. Make people afraid. Tell them who is to blame. In America, that is how you sell a product. That is how you win elections. Fear is how you divide. Fear is how you enslave.

Shame is how you silence the skeptics and those who would speak out in protest. Shame is how you suppress dissent.

It’s time to fight back against the cacophony of the establishment — media, movies, ads from corporations and lobbyists — all trying to make you feel afraid and all trying to make you feel ashamed.

• Ashamed to be American.

• Ashamed to be a white male.

• Ashamed to be gay.

• Ashamed to drive a used car.

• Ashamed to have ancestors who might have owned slaves.

• Ashamed to be bald, fat, black, wealthy, poor, to eat meat, to not shop at Whole Foods, or to like cats more than dogs.

What a load of crap. Don’t let anybody control you or your thinking. That way of life, that type of politics and moral dictatorship needs to be left in the ash heap.

Let’s focus on what’s right with each other — the principles and hopes we all have in common. The next two generations can just let all of that go. Martin Luther King, Jr. was right: Love wins.

1-tABR7dNCKaHqL0ZlMTGeag

US civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr., waves to supporters from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial 28 August, 1963, on The Mall in Washington, DC (AFP/Getty Images)

Let the legacy of your generation be to realize the mistakes of the ones that came before.

The partisan politics, the fear-driven marketing from special interest groups who send out scare-mail and shame you into another donation — their empire is dying. Dying empires thrash about.

• They will start wars.

• They will pass new draconian laws.

• They will ban public gatherings.

• They will kill each other’s leaders.

• They will pass new taxes to curb behaviors they don’t like.

• They will spend money they don’t have, point at their apparent prosperity and say, “See, we’re great!” and try to convince themselves they’re still the greatest nation on earth.

Only they aren’t enjoying their own prosperity, they are enjoying yours. They’ve stolen it from you as surely as if they held a gun to your head.

• More monuments

• More people with health care

• More college graduates

• More police

• More hospitals

All good things, right?

• More hubris

• More bailouts

• More safety regulations

• More debt

• More guns in the hands of bureaucrats

• More power over you

It wasn’t their greatness, it was yours. Their empire is built on $200 trillion of debt. Numbers that have become so large they are meaningless. But they don’t have to pay it. The politicians who left us that tab will be dead and gone when the bill comes due.

No big deal, right?

I’m not asking too much, am I? Let’s see, you just need to throw off the shackles of fear and shame, help the country reboot into America 3.0, pay off $200 trillion in debt and learn to live and let live.

1-uITC6WwSUzQz-sUyoPYnJQ

The National Debt Clock is seen on the corner of Sixth Avenue and West 44th Street on August 1, 2011 in New York City. (Andrew Burton/Getty Images)

So, what enables you to do those things?

When you figure it out, that is what goes into the letter to your grandkids. Not what you fear, but what compels you to stand and keeps you standing through the storms of life.

That is what I wanted to hear from my grandparents. That would have helped me navigate my life. The answers that help you navigate your life will never be found with someone who says, “I’ll fix the transgender bathroom problem.” They are too narrow-minded. They don’t get it. They don’t see the future.

I have grandkids. Whether I like it or not, I’ll be leaving them a legacy, a heritage, a code of ethics and honor, a name to live up to. I am leaving them a world to inhabit. As technology advances forward at this rapid pace, they might have to inhabit it for a long time.

The legacy we leave isn’t just physical. It’s moral. If we choose it, if we let it, this will be the next Golden Age for man, and for freedom.

Featured Image: The Glenn Beck Program

In one of his first executive orders, President Joe Biden reversed the Trump administration's ban on critical race theory training within the federal government.

Christopher F. Rufo, director for the Discovery Institute's Center on Wealth and Poverty, joined BlazeTV's Glenn Beck to discuss what this means moving forward and how you can help defend America's values in your local governments, businesses, and schools.

Rufo, whose research inspired former President Donald Trump's ban on critical race theory training in federal agencies last year, said he's gearing up for a classic David vs. Goliath underdog fight and taking this "Marxist takeover" to the courts, where he's optimistic it'll be ruled not only anti-American, but outright unlawful.

"We're going to wage decentralized, relentless, legal warfare against critical race theory in every American institution, and really flood the zone in the courts," Rufo said. "I think that when we get up, hopefully, to the Supreme Court, I'm confident that we'll win because this stuff is just so toxic, it's so divisive, it's so harmful. I have faith that at the end of the day, the folks within the judiciary — and even the court of public opinion — will be on our side."

Watch the video below to catch more of Glenn's conversation with Christopher Rufo:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Remember when rooting for your favorite sports team felt patriotic? It's no secret that the sports world has become extremely leftist over the past few years and is now even preaching anti-American ideals in many ways.

This week on "The Glenn Beck Podcast," Glenn spoke with veteran sports journalist Jason Whitlock about where he believes this all started — and Whitlock tied it back to former President Barack Obama, Nike, and China.

Whitlock first talked about how professional football and baseball used to have a healthy rivalry over which was the most patriotic.

"The military fly-overs, the national anthem before the game, and all of that — the NFL tried to make you feel like the most patriotic thing you could do on a Sunday is go to church and watch football. It was a brilliant business strategy that catapulted football to where it's America's favorite pastime. ... It's something that I authentically believe in: Sports do teach the values that best exemplify America," he said.

"Then China and our competitors figured out, if you really want to influence American culture, you have to get into the sports world," he added.

Whitlock also told Glenn why he believes President Obama and Nike both played significant roles in moving left-wing political rhetoric into the world of sports.

"I'm not some super-harsh Barack Obama critic, but I'm just going to let the facts speak for themselves. Barack Obama intentionally partnered with ESPN because he wanted to speak to that sports audience," he said.

"It was a process of 'let's move left-wing stuff into the sports world,'" he added. "And Nike is a much bigger business, five to six times more lucrative than the NBA. Nike actually runs the NBA. The NBA is a marketing arm of Nike. Nike's relationship with China is the key to all of this."

Watch the video clip below, or the full podcast with Jason Whitlock here:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

IN PLAIN SIGHT: COVID and mental health

NotesfromPoland.com

A lot of times, people drown in plain sight. Largely because most of us haven't been taught what to look for. We're accustomed to the movie version of a person struggling in the water — flailing their arms and shrieking and gymnastic — but in real life drowning is quieter, something you could see and not realize. It's never been harder than it is now, in 2020, as we're all locked indoors, alone, out of sight.

Every year, an estimated one million people worldwide kill themselves. A death every 40 seconds.

America is in the throes of a suicide epidemic, with the highest suicide rate since World War II. Suicide rates have risen 30 percent since 1999, and the number keeps climbing. There were 45,000 suicide deaths in 2016 alone. In 2017, there were 47,000. Roughly 129 people a day.

In 2018, 10.7 million American adults seriously thought about suicide, 3.3 million made a plan, and 1.4 million attempted suicide. There were 48,344 recorded suicides. That's roughly one person every 11 minutes. And that's 1,171 more people than the year before. The average American knows 600 people. Meaning, the increase of suicide deaths in one year was more than double the number of people you know. And that's just the difference.

Suicide is the 10th-leading cause of death in this country. It is the second leading cause of death among children, and since 2000, there has been a worrying jump in the suicide rate of 15-to-24-year-olds.

In January, USA Today ran an article about the rising suicide rates, "More and more Americans are dying by suicide. What are we missing?

That was January. Three months before the pandemic sent all of us indoors.

An article in The BMJ, a weekly peer-reviewed medical journal, points that "Widely reported studies modeling the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicide rates predicted increases ranging from 1% to 145%." In other words, "We really don't know."

So we can't prove exactly how much damage the pandemic and the lockdowns have caused, or how many suicides there have been this year compared to last year because those numbers will take a while to assemble. But we can get an idea by measuring the scope and prevalence of the conditions that lead to suicide, and they are significantly higher in 2020. Because what's not in doubt is that the pandemic has gravely affected people's mental health.

Affect on Adults

For starters, while suicides tend to drop at the start of pandemics, they quickly increase in response to the conditions of quarantine. It's also true that suicide rates increase during recessions.

A study in Science Advances journal noted that "as the rates of COVID-19 positive cases and deaths increased substantially across the United States, COVID-19–related acute stress and depressive symptoms increased over time in the United States." A CDC report from August found that in 2020 compared to 2019, adults' symptoms of anxiety have tripled and symptoms of depression have quadrupled (24.3% versus 6.5%). Compared to 2018, two different studies concluded that symptoms of depression and "serious psychological distress" are triple the level they were. In fact, the rates of anxiety and depression have been higher throughout the pandemic than "after other large-scale traumas like September 11th, Hurricane Katrina and the Hong Kong unrest." Ten percent of Americans surveyed in June said they had seriously considered suicide in the past 30 days.

French philosopher Albert Camus once wrote that "In the depths of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer."

Well, we find ourselves — literally and figuratively — in the depths of winter.

Well, we find ourselves — literally and figuratively — in the depths of winter.

Lockdowns

A number of studies warn about the danger posed by lockdowns. One in particular, published in Lancet, summarizes it well: "Most reviewed studies reported negative psychological effects including post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger. Stressors included longer quarantine duration, infection fears, frustration, boredom, inadequate supplies, inadequate information, financial loss, and stigma. Some researchers have suggested long-lasting effects."

The report is very clear about how to minimize the harm of quarantine: Give people as much information as possible, reduce boredom, improve communication, emphasize altruism, and keep lockdowns as short as possible.

Affect on Children

The pandemic and the lockdowns have been especially difficult, and even fatal, for one group in particular, but you might not have heard about it because the media is too obsessed with identity politics to stop for a moment and look at the bigger picture. I'm talking about the most important population: Children.

But they aren't dying of Covid. In fact, children are more likely to die of homicides, drowning, or even fires and burns, than they are to die of Covid. The Academy of Pediatrics reported that, as of December 3rd, children accounted for slightly more than 0% of all COVID-19 cases, and even fewer deaths, about 0.11%, about 160 in total. There are still 15 states with zero reported child deaths. They don't even catch it as often: They account for less than 2% of the total confirmed COVID-19 cases globally. Even here in America, the nation with the highest infection rates, that number is the same: 2%. And, when they do catch it, the overwhelming majority of them experience either no symptoms or mild symptoms. Another recent study found that, compared to the flu, children play a minimal role in spreading Covid-19, and most children who contract it actually get it from their parents.

So they rarely catch it, they almost never die because of it, and they don't spread it. Yet, according to data from the CDC, the rate of children visiting emergency rooms has skyrocketed. Compared with 2019, the number of 5-11-year-olds is 24% higher, while the rate for 12-17-year-olds is 31% higher. This surge is due to mental health reasons.

According to a ton of studies (Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, Here, and Here), during the pandemic, children of all ages have "had high rates of depression, anxiety, and pos-traumatic symptoms as expected in the aftermath of any disaster."

The reality is unequivocal: The lockdowns and quarantines are bad for children. Certainly much, much worse than the disease itself, a point Donald Trump was heckled by the media for making. We waded through a sea of studies, reports, and articles, and the consensus was so consistent that we shifted our focus to looking for studies that said otherwise.

The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction released a study this month that found that three in four children have reported having depression, and that "the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on children's mental well-being is worrying 60% of parents, according to a survey by parents with primary-aged children and 87% reported that their children were missing school and less than half stated that their children were feeling lonely, which altogether affects their children's mental health and wellbeing."

One study found that children of all age groups "showed more clinging, inattention, and irritability. However, 3-6 year-olds were more likely to manifest clinginess and fear that family members might contract the infection, while 6-18 year-olds were more likely to show inattention and persistent inquiry." Another study found that "In many households, children who end up staying indoors become restless and, in some cases, violent."

Children need predictability... and they need to believe that their parents are in control of things.

Uncertainty, social isolation, and parental angst. Children need predictability, they need activities, and they need to believe that their parents are in control of things. But, as a result of draconian lockdowns, they have spent much more time in front of screens. They are also more susceptible to sleep disruptions, or "somatic symptoms." And they are at a much higher risk for sexual abuse and domestic abuse, and, without school, unable to escape it.

Like us, they'll be dealing with the long term effects of the pandemic and lockdown for the rest of their lives. The difference is, we're more equipped to handle it.

One report refers to the undue harm lockdowns cause children as "collateral damage," adding that "we all have a responsibility to promote the health and well-being of children at home, and to ask questions and fight for service provision in areas where clinicians are not needed to fight COVID-19 but are needed to protect children."

As a society, it is our duty to protect the defenseless, and there is no group of people more defenseless, yet more important, than children.

German philosopher Kant wrote a lot about suicide. His argument can basically be boiled down to two parts:

1) I ought to do my duty as long as I am alive; and

2) It is my duty to go on living as long as possible.

He used the anecdote of civilization as a human body. We must only harm our body if it's necessary for self-preservation. If a toe is necrotic for whatever reason, we amputate it, so that we can preserve our body, our person, as a whole. Suicide, on the other hand, is an act of destruction. It is harmful, not just to the person it removes from humanity, but to humanity as a whole. Each of us plays a role in making sure that body remains in motion. So, when a person resorts to suicide, they are harming the body, the whole, they are depriving society and humanity. They are severing limbs or slicing our arms. They are robbing us of every good that they would bring.

School

Most European countries have closed their schools. According to UNESCO, 91% of children worldwide have been affected by school closures. A study from Bangladesh found that Bangladeshi children were suffering from higher rates of depression, anxiety, and sleeping disorder. In Italy and Spain, one study determined that 85% of parents have noticed negative changes in their children's emotions and behaviors since the pandemic. In England, deaths by suicide among children increased shortly after the country's first lockdown. In Holland, a study "found that young people reported a significant increase in severe anxiety and sleeping problems during the country's lockdown period." Numerous studies from China found that roughly a quarter of children were suffering from the same symptoms. In India, like many other countries, children are spending so much time in front of screens that experts fear it will lead to "psycho-social problems, like lower self-esteem."

Meanwhile, in Sweden, where schools and childcare centers have remained open, the spread of Covid as a result of children attending school is practically nonexistent. Over the next few years, research will show us exactly how Sweden's no-lockdown approach affected their youth.

The research concludes that children should remain in school.

Overwhelmingly — and I mean overwhelmingly — the research concludes that children should remain in school. Academic articles are known for their boring, long-winded, incomprehensible titles, but not these. Like this one: "Mitigate the effects of home confinement on children during the COVID-19 outbreak."

Children need physical activity, which is crucial to minimizing depression and anxiety. Schools provide structure. Schools are a consistent source for children's nutrition, and a lapse in nutrition can have psychological effects. Schools also provide healthcare.

School closures have also put children at a higher risk of domestic violence or sexual abuse, because "school is a safe space where children can report problems and where signs of abuse can be detected."

Children need community. They need friends. While many adults are at home with their kids, most of us are working, and children left alone on workdays are more likely to have anxiety or depression.

Teenagers

According to the CDC, of every demographic, 18-24-year-olds have been most affected, with 75% of respondents in that age range reporting at least one negative mental health symptom. One-quarter said they were using more drugs and alcohol to cope with pandemic-related stress, and another one-quarter said they had "seriously considered suicide" in the previous 30 days.

No prom. No graduation. No church. No dates. No birthday parties — birthdays spent alone. No games. No homecoming. No extracurricular clubs. No sports. No Spring Break — no vacations at all. No funerals, although there are plenty of people being buried.

Teenagers in lockdown are more concerned about their more basic needs. They feel less connected to other people. They are learning less and spending less time on school work. In other words, they are hurting, and bad.

The number of studies that back this up is daunting.

Three papers (Here, Here, and Here) determined that older adolescents suffer more symptoms of depression than younger ones and children. Another study describes the "collective trauma" that the lockdowns have had on teenagers.

The National 4-H Council found that:

●81% of teens say mental health is a significant issue for young people in the U.S., and 64% of teens believe that the experience of COVID-19 will have a lasting impact on their generation's mental health.

●7 in 10 teens have experienced struggles with mental health.

●55% of teens say they've experienced anxiety, 45% excessive stress, and 43% depression.

●61% of teens said that the COVID-19 pandemic has increased their feeling of loneliness.

●82% of teens calling on America to talk more openly and honestly about mental health issues in this country.

Life has always been hard for teenagers, but even before the pandemic, it has been especially rough on American teenagers, who are twice as likely "today to have more anxiety symptoms and twice as likely to see a mental health professional as teens in the 1980s.

Here's how the conversation went on radio:

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH: The politics of COVID-19 is DESTROYING our children youtu.be


On "Glenn TV" this week, Megyn Kelly, host of the "Megyn Kelly Show," told Glenn Beck she believes the Democrats' talk of unity is "all nonsense" and forecasted the "death of journalism" under a Biden administration.

Megyn cited President Joe Biden's unwillingness to make concessions that would help unify Democrats and Republicans as an example of how much he actually cares about unity, and added that, while she's all for lowering the political temperature in America, she also believes there are some personal freedoms that are worth fighting for.

"What's happening substantively is worth fighting for and it's not going to go away just because [Biden] gave a nice speech," Megyn said.

"I will object. I will protect my family and what I think is right over Joe Biden's need for unity, which is false anyway. 'Unify behind my agenda' is not a real call for unity," she added.

Megyn said she believes the Left has reached too far and "awakened a sleeping giant" in reference to the silent majority who should speak up, speak out, and refuse to be silenced any longer.

Watch the video clip below to catch more of the conversation:

Because the content of this show is sure to set off the censors, the full episode is only be available on BlazeTV. Get $30 off a one-year subscription to BlazeTV with the code "GLENN." With BlazeTV, you get the unvarnished truth from the most pro-America network in the country, free from Big Tech and MSM censors.