Jim Acosta Should Stick to Reporting and Leave the History Lectures to Those Who Know History

A few years ago, I met with two amazing men, the Stewart brothers. They're a composer and conductor of an incredible choir, the Millennial Choirs & Orchestras. And I said, "Let's give the Statue of Liberty a voice. But let's correct it." Because everybody thinks that the Statue of Liberty is a mother, a nurse that is inviting give us the worst of the worst. And that's not what that poem means. I asked them, I said, "Can you write something that gives this heart, but then corrects the legend and gives the correct voice to the Statue of Liberty?"

The Statue of Liberty is not -- we're not a hospital. And that golden door is not the golden door to a hospital. This, the Statue of Liberty is a shield saying, "We don't want your storied pomp. We don't want your lords and ladies and your knights, and all of the crap, the lions on your flag, because it's all crap. We don't want any of that. That oppresses people. That keeps people down. Now, this is coming --- written at a time when we had no national anthem. We didn't even have a standardized flag until Woodrow Wilson. And no national anthem until FDR. We had no storied pomp at all. We were a collection of people who believed in something. That's the message.

The real poem says, not like the brazen giant of Greek fame with conquering limbs, astride from land to land. Here at our sea-washed, sunset gate shall stand a mighty woman with a torch, whose flame is imprisoned lightning, and her name is Mother of Exiles.

From her beaconed hand glows worldwide welcome. Her mild eyes command the air bridged harbor that twin cities frame. Keep your ancient lands and your storied pomp, she cries with silent lips.

You give me the ones that you say can't make it, who try and try and try and you continue to push down in the mud, that all these people are asking for is a chance to change their lives. Give those people to me. I will stand as a shield to protect them against people like you so they have a chance to not just survive but to thrive.

The Statue of Liberty is not saying give me those that you can no longer keep on insurance. The tired, the worn-out, the broken, the ones that won't work, the ones that are just expunging off your system. That's not what the Statue of Liberty is saying. The Statue of Liberty is saying, "Give me the tired." What are they tired of? Tired of being pushed down in the mud. Tired of being told by some lord or lady, "You work for me. That's now my idea." They're poor because you wouldn't give them the opportunity.

Ask any European today, they will tell you, unless you are connected, unless your family has a name, you don't change your status.

If you're poor, you're always poor. If you're homeless, you're never going to be the president. You'll never make it to king. You'll never make it to prime minister. Who was your family? Your dad was poor. Your dad was a drunk and homeless. You'll never amount to anything. Stay in your station!

But wait. I can do it. I'm the better man. I'm the better woman. I work harder than anybody else. I know more than that person over there. I've built a better mousetrap.

Yes, you have. And because you've built it and you've built it as my serf, it now belongs to me.

The Statue of Liberty, that poem, it never, never meant, send me the worst of the worst, and they're going to stay the worst of the worst. I'm just going to protect them.

That was a challenge. You keep all your ridiculous lion flags and your ridiculous edifices of great power. We're a simple country. We don't have any of that stuff. We're just a collection of people that every country said, "They'll never make it. They're worthless. They're farmers. What, we're the greatest army and navy in the world. They're farmers. Go kill them."

Our first president was a farmer and just wanted to be a farmer. Always wanted to just farm. That's all episode to do. He became president. And where did he go? He didn't become a lord or a lady.

He went back to being a farmer. And no greater than anybody else alive at the time. President was an insult. They laughed when he said, you should call me president. That should be the title.

President? That was like "shopkeep." That was like "manager."

That was an insult to somebody who had power over in Europe. I am so sick of the playground and the playground fights. I'm so sick of the press. I'm sick of Congress. I'm sick of the White House.

I have spent most of my life as a joke, so I come to you from a position of authority. I know jokes when I see them. And Congress and the press and the administration, they're a joke. If you didn't pay attention to the news yesterday, you'd think, "This is one weird-ass way for starting this show today."

But there was an argument between Acosta, a reporter from CNN, and I don't know, the next Trump spokesperson of the day, at the White House press briefing.

Now, I want you to understand, up front, I agreed with him. Acosta, do I need to explain what your job is? You're a reporter. You're a reporter. That means you report on what happens, not argue, not lecture. You report. You can ask questions, but that's not what you were doing. You weren't asking questions yesterday. You were making a point. You were lecturing. You were using histrionics. You don't even know the truth behind the Statue of Liberty.

Hey, Acosta, can you tell me why the French boxed that baby up and pretty much dumped it into a park in New York City? Oh, yeah, and, by the way, here are some instructions on how to assemble it. Some assembly. In fact, a lot of assembly is required. All of the instructions, and I mean this literally, all of the instructions are in French. We didn't even take the time to put them in English for you.

Jim Acosta, can you tell me why? Can you tell me what the Statue of Liberty was even meant for? Because it really wasn't meant for us.

No, see, you don't really care about history. Because all you were trying to do was win.

And I understand. I mean, that's what you've all been trained to do. That's what you think reporting and journalism is now. You win.

And I really had zero time for Steven Miller at the White House, even though any other time in my life, I would have been, "Yeah, look at Steven Miller go. He's right. He's right. He's right."

I had no time for him last night. I get home. I'm trying to spend time with my kids. My son is going to get his swimming certificate for Boy Scouts.

I've got a million things going on. And I turn that on? Why? Why?

And you expect me, Steven Miller, to give you credit, standing behind a podium where, yeah, I don't know -- is it possible that 30 seconds before this discussion, you were defending the indefensible. You were so distorting the truth and defending absolute bald-faced lies. Yeah, it's not only possible. It's probable. And if it wasn't you, it certainly was somebody an hour before you.

How does this help America? They weren't discussing the concept of the melting pot. You know, maybe we should all have a quick refresher on how Americans resident sending all of their rapists. And then after that, a real quick quiz on all of the illegals who are rapists, drunks, and killers, and thieves. Those guys that shouldn't be arrested 20 times, just to be let out again so they can finally rape an old woman after they steal her car, or just go down on a beautiful afternoon and shoot an innocent woman on a San Francisco dock. Then maybe after we talk about those two things, maybe we could take a break. Have a little lunch. Then pick up some big boy talk, concerning the ridiculous idea that we're actually helping immigrants by not ensuring that they speak English.

Of course, that is going to require you to have an honest conversation regarding history on why it was illegal to teach a slave how to read. Gee. By the way, that's not an American thing. That law was first enforced in ancient times, including countries that were not made up of white Europeans. It's crazy and shocking, yes, I know. But I will give you this: Perhaps the ancients learned about that law from the Americans that arrived via the Stargate. I'm not sure. James Spader may have taught them that.

How many people in our own country today are being abused, as well as in other non-European countries, by people of all colors and creeds. Because they don't speak the language.

This happens all over the world, and it is as old as time itself. How many dirtbags are ruling over those poor huddled masses?

Because those poor huddled masses don't speak English. Save your speeches, both of you clowns. Save your speeches for the people that died in the back of that semi-truck in San Antonio.

You know what, and then give the same speech to those who live in the shadows and are afraid of calling the police when they had been raped or beaten or robbed. Talk to me about the Statue of Liberty then, will you?

Who is ruling over those people? Somebody is. It's got to be just -- well, it's got to be just the Democrats, right? Because all the Democrats are good. No, sorry. All the heroes are really all Republicans.

Yeah, neither of those are true. And we as Americans need to say to these clowns, "Shut up. Stop it." Because I know the horror caused by the twisted thinking on the left on this issue, I ain't buying it. But I also know the horrors of a place which is a no-go zone here in America called the colonias. Most Americans have not heard of the colonias. This is an area here in America, just over the border, a no-go zone where it just kind of falls in the shadow, where giant corporations are allowed to use and abuse these people and trap them in what is nothing more than modern day slavery because those companies have given payoffs to the GOP. So neither of you have much to say that I really want to listen to because you're just both using the situation. You're exploiting the people and situation for their own power and money.

People in Congress, people at the heads of the parties, people in the administration, quite honestly, the last two, you're grotesque, and you're sickening. You should be ashamed of yourself.

You want to have a real conversation, let's have a real conversation. But can we have that? Because right now, there are people listening who, "See, Glenn Beck just hates Donald Trump." And those people who are just listening who are now saying, "See, Glenn Beck has always been a GOP stooge. He'll stand up for anything." And, of course, the ones I really like, the people who have just tuned in, heard maybe one sentence, and now are currently tweeting or posting somewhere their valid and vapid opinion to the whole world, even though they have absolutely no idea what I'm even talking about.

Maybe it's an audience of one, me. But if you're sick of them had it and you want to fix the problem, good.

Most self-proclaimed Marxists know very little about Marxism. Some of them have all the buzzwords memorized. They talk about the exploits of labor. They talk about the slavery of capitalist society and the alienation caused by capital. They talk about the evils of power and domination.

But they don't actually believe what they say. Or else they wouldn't be such violent hypocrites. And we're not being dramatic when we say "violent."

For them, Marxism is a political tool that they use to degrade and annoy their political enemies.

They don't actually care about the working class.

Another important thing to remember about Marxists is that they talk about how they want to defend the working class, but they don't actually understand the working class. They definitely don't realize that the working class is composed mostly of so many of the people they hate. Because, here's the thing, they don't actually care about the working class. Or the middle class. They wouldn't have the slightest clue how to actually work, not the way we do. For them, work involves ranting about how work and labor are evil.

Ironically, if their communist utopia actually arrived, they would be the first ones against the wall. Because they have nothing to offer except dissent. They have no practical use and no real connection to reality.

Again ironically, they are the ultimate proof of the success of capitalism. The fact that they can freely call for its demise, in tweets that they send from their capitalistic iPhones, is proof that capitalism affords them tremendous luxuries.

Their specialty is complaining. They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They sneer at Christianity for promising Heaven in exchange for good deeds on earth — which is a terrible description of Christianity, but it's what they actually believe — and at the same time they criticize Christianity for promising a utopia, they give their unconditional devotion to a religion that promises a utopia.

They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They think capitalism has turned us into machines. Which is a bad interpretation of Marx's concept of the General Intellect, the idea that humans are the ones who create machines, so humans, not God, are the creators.

They think that the only way to achieve the perfect society is by radically changing and even destroying the current society. It's what they mean when they say things about the "status quo" and "hegemony" and the "established order." They believe that the system is broken and the way to fix it is to destroy, destroy, destroy.

Critical race theory actually takes it a step farther. It tells us that the racist system can never be changed. That racism is the original sin that white people can never overcome. Of course, critical race theorists suggest "alternative institutions," but these "alternative institutions" are basically the same as the ones we have now, only less effective and actually racist.

Marx's violent revolution never happened. Or at least it never succeeded. Marx's followers have had to take a different approach. And now, we are living through the Revolution of Constant Whining.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.

Americans are losing faith in our justice system and the idea that legal consequences are applied equally — even to powerful elites in office.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to detail what he believes will come next with the Durham investigation, which hopefully will provide answers to the Obama FBI's alleged attempts to sabotage former President Donald Trump and his campaign years ago.

Rep. Nunes and Glenn assert that we know Trump did NOT collude with Russia, and that several members of the FBI possibly committed huge abuses of power. So, when will we see justice?

Watch the video clip below:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The corporate media is doing everything it can to protect Dr. Anthony Fauci after Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) roasted him for allegedly lying to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

During an extremely heated exchange at a Senate hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Paul challenged Dr. Fauci — who, as the director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, oversees research programs at the National Institute of Health — on whether the NIH funded dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Dr. Fauci denied the claims, but as Sen. Paul knows, there are documents that prove Dr. Fauci's NIH was funding gain-of-function research in the Wuhan biolab before COVID-19 broke out in China.

On "The Glenn Beck Program," Glenn and Producer Stu Burguiere presented the proof, because Dr. Fauci's shifting defenses don't change the truth.

Watch the video clip below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Critical race theory: A special brand of evil

wal_172619/Pixabay

Part of what makes it hard for us to challenge the left is that their beliefs are complicated. We don't mean complicated in a positive way. They aren't complicated the way love is complicated. They're complicated because there's no good explanation for them, no basis in reality.

The left cannot pull their heads out of the clouds. They are stuck on romantic ideas, abstract ideas, universal ideas. They talk in theories. They see the world through ideologies. They cannot divorce themselves from their own academic fixations. And — contrary to what they believe and how they act — it's not because leftists are smarter than the rest of us. And studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country. Marx was no different. The Communist Manifesto talks about how the rise of cities "rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life."

Studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country.

Instead of admitting that they're pathological hypocrites, they tell us that we're dumb and tell us to educate ourselves. Okay, so we educate ourselves; we return with a coherent argument. Then they say, "Well, you can't actually understand what you just said unless you understand the work of this other obscure Marxist writer. So educate yourselves more."

It's basically the "No True Scotsman" fallacy, the idea that when you point out a flaw in someone's argument, they say, "Well, that's a bad example."

After a while, it becomes obvious that there is no final destination for their bread-crumb trail. Everything they say is based on something that somebody else said, which is based on something somebody else said.

Take critical race theory. We're sure you've noticed by now that it is not evidence-based — at all. It is not, as academics say, a quantitative method. It doesn't use objective facts and data to arrive at conclusions. Probably because most of those conclusions don't have any basis in reality.

Critical race theory is based on feelings. These feelings are based on theories that are also based on feelings.

We wanted to trace the history of critical race theory back to the point where its special brand of evil began. What allowed it to become the toxic, racist monster that it is today?

Later, we'll tell you about some of the snobs who created critical theory, which laid the groundwork for CRT. But if you follow the bread-crumb trail from their ideas, you wind up with Marxism.

For years, the staff has devoted a lot of time to researching Marxism. We have read a lot of Marx and Marxist writing. It's part of our promise to you to be as informed as possible, so that you know where to go for answers; so that you know what to say when your back is up against the wall. What happens when we take the bread-crumb trail back farther, past Marxism? What is it based on?

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism.

It's actually based on the work of one of the most important philosophers in human history, a 19th-century German philosopher named Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism. And, as you'll see in just a bit, if we look at Hegel's actual ideas, it's obvious that Marx completely misrepresented them in order to confirm his own fantasies.

So, in a way, that's where the bread-crumb trail ends: With Marx's misrepresentation of an incredibly important, incredibly useful philosophy, a philosophy that's actually pretty conservative.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.