Glenn Beck: Anwr or Bust!


Congressman Steve King

GLENN:  So let me just, I just -- first let me start here.  I compiled a list just a few minutes ago.  See if I'm missing anything.  So far congress has said no drilling in the ANWR, no drilling off the coast of Florida and California, we're not getting any new 100-year leases to drill in the Gulf while China and Venezuela and Cuba are going in.  Congress, as well as all three presidential candidates, said there's a cap and trade legislation that will increase the price of gas according to the EPA by $1.50 a gallon.  We're shutting down oil fields in Colorado, we won't develop shale oil fields in western states.  Yesterday -- love this -- we pass legislation that let us sue OPEC.  I'm sure they're not going to retaliate.  We have allowed environmental attorneys to sue the oil companies for possible future destruction of an Alaskan Eskimo village.  We also have protected the polar bear and its habitat right where the oil deposits are located.  We're talking about seizing windfall profits, won't allow anybody to drill in some small areas -- no, I'm sorry.  We have allowed them to drill in small areas in Alaska while creating very generous environmental laws that have tied up the very production because the oil companies are in court.  We've also not allowed anybody to build a new refinery for 30 years.  In fact, we've cut our operational refineries in half since 1982.  We won't develop coal-to-oil, and also we're telling the oil companies which blends they have to make.  What -- these evil oil companies, why is the price of gas so high?

KING:  Well, that is the most extensive list that I have heard.  Compared to the list that I've been rolling out here and when I hear that and just the weight of it all, it almost makes me want to go to my knees, let alone think what happens to the economy of the United States of America, which would be brought to its knees if this isn't reversed.  I just stepped out of a conference this morning and listened to a presentation by the Heritage Foundation and I've been convinced of this for a long time.  They've got empirical data and it's very convincing that the people that are advancing this cap and trade want to slow our economy down, want to reverse our economy, and they know that if they shut down energy, they back the economy off and they are doing it all because they worship mother nature.

GLENN:  Dan, do we have the audio of Bill Clinton saying that in a speech?  We have -- we'll have to find it.  We have audio of Bill Clinton talking to an environmental group.  He was talking about green energy and everything else and he said we all know that the only way to really do this is to halt the economy.  And we were dumbfounded that this man would actually admit to that.  But we have it on tape.  We'll try to find it for you.

KING:  Occasionally Bill Clinton told the truth evidently.

GLENN:  Evidently he did.  So right now overnight long-term oil futures went up $9.  They are saying now that oil per barrel will be at least $140 a barrel.  T. Boone Pickens says that we're looking at $200 a barrel coming our way.  What are we doing?  Is there anybody in Washington that is, besides you, that is saying, okay, we've got to go and get every bit of resource out of the ground we can?

KING:  There are a few that are doing that.  It's a growing number of Republicans.  And there's also a certain amount of apprehension on the part of other Republicans.  You know, one of the green movement environmentalists line up their lobby and they start to come after and target members of congress because they utter things that are logical and rational about energy supply, there's a significant political punishment that's there, and the environmentalists have not been held accountable to answer up to the facts and the data that they are putting together and so politically what this is is a reflection of the voices of their constituents.  And it has not -- the American people are not well enough informed.  They have chosen sides on the global warming issue, for example, and I would say you can walk the streets anywhere in America and you can't find anybody that actually knows the science behind it.  They just decide who they want to believe and that's really going to bring us to our knees in the next generation.

GLENN:  So tell me about the ANWR.  What did you find out when you threw over the ANWR and you went up to check things out?

KING:  I flew over and I also went down on the ground, I talked to the Eskimos there that want to drill.  It's 19.6 million acres.  There's not a single tree in that entire area, not for 700 miles from where they want to drill for oil.  This is a carbon copy of the ecosystem that we drilled in the north slope of Alaska in the early Seventies.

GLENN:  Didn't they say that was going to cause all kinds of ecological problems in the north slope?

CALLER:  I think it was because the caribou herd quadrupled than what it was in 1970.  They all said of course the caribou multiplied because they shot the wolves.  Now they didn't have any guns up there.  I was signed up.  It's just they will contrive any argument.  If there ever was a safe place and a good place for this to be oil, it's up in ANWR.  There is no caribou herd in the ANWR region.  There are a few musk oxen, I saw a few white birds.  They are going to do fine whether we drill or whether we don't.  So if the question I ask, it goes off of the question of if a tree falls in the forest and there's no one there to hear it, did it make any noise?  If we drill environmentally friendly wells in the ANWR and no one is there to see them, did it damage the scenery?  That's the question.  And are we going to starve this nation for energy because somebody is afraid that they will have to look at a drill rig up there in ANWR.  By the way, when they get the drilling done, they put submersible pumps in.  You don't see a pump jack above the ground.  You just see a little workover pad that's a square patch of rock that they will go out and pull the pump out if it needs work in the wintertime.  It couldn't be any more environmentally friendly.  Dennis Kucinich couldn't identify the north slope oil fields today.  They would be a lot harder to identify in ANWR.

GLENN:  There is enough natural gas in this country that we could tap that environmentalists won't let us tap.  How much natural gas do we have?

KING:  Well, the numbers are different, reports there are out.  One is out of Continental shelf itself, at least 406 trillion cube I can feet of natural gas.

GLENN:  How much is that?  What does that mean?

KING:  I don't know if I can equate that into how long that will work for us, how long it will last, but another one, some data that was produced here about three years ago was underneath our nonnational park public lands in the United States, there's enough natural gas to heat every home in the United States for the next 150 years.  That's another way to quantify it.  We have a lot of natural gas.  And as we know from the oil finds, there's a lot of gas out there that we haven't identified and haven't declared to be a reserve at this point.

GLENN:  What do you think the reaction from OPEC is going to be if the Senate decides to slap OPEC and say we're going to see you?

KING:  Well, I think the futures have already indicated that overnight.  I took to the floor and debated against the NOPEC bill as they call it, the one that outlaws OPEC.  And if OPEC is making those decisions and they are watching congress and they think there's going to be a bill that will grant the authority to the Department of Justice and the attorney general to sue them, that means that the ultimate result of that suit, if it's successful, would be the freezing of their assets in the United States.  So I think that they freeze -- they hold their oil production where it is now, they are certainly not going to increase it to try to get ahead of the criticism of congress.  So they either stop it where it is or they reduce their production and I think there's going to be talk about whether they will pull assets out of the United States to avoid them being frozen.  That's going to be the natural thing that would happen.  All of that makes it harder for our economy to function and all of it makes harder to have more energy on the marketplace.

GLENN:  We've got them right where we want them.  We went over there and begged them for oil, we went over there and begged them to prop up our financial sector.  We got them where we want them, congressman.

KING:  Well, at the beginning of the program, I don't know how anyone can contrive more things to do to drive up the cost of energy and slow our economy than the list of things that the Democrats have done to take energy off the marketplace and intimidate the futures market as well.

GLENN:  Well, for anybody who thinks that it is not their intent, Dan, roll the speech from Bill Clinton.  Listen to this clip.

BILL CLINTON:  We just have to slow down our economy and cut back our greenhouse emissions because we've got to save the planet for our grandchildren.

GLENN:  There it is.  We've got to slow down our economy to save the planet for our grandchildren.  If that doesn't tell you everything you need to know, nothing will.

KING:  I think Bill Clinton has told the truth on that.  That is their agenda.  I've been saying it from the floor of congress, this whole 110th congress that they have convinced me that they want to increase the cost of energy and they want to do that and it will slow down the economy.  And increasing the cost means people will use less energy.  If they use less energy, there will be fewer carbon emissions and they believe that it keeps the greenhouse gases out of Bill Clinton said it and it will save our planet.  Now, it doesn't matter to them that the science doesn't necessarily support that and that there are 31,000 scientists that have signed up that said they don't buy the global warming argument.

Let me make maybe a new argument out here, one that I've been making and that is that I think this Earth has a built-in thermostat and in this way, that 4/5ths of the Earth is covered by water.  If the Earth warms, there will be more evaporation of that water and the evaporation has to come down in the form of rain.  If it rains more, there will be more plant growth, which means more photosynthesis which means more carbon sequestration just by formula.  So there has to be a built-in thermostat in this Earth.  I don't know if it's 1 or 2 degrees or if it's 7 or 8, but I do believe that if the Earth is going to warm, we'll get more rain, we'll get more photosynthesis and that will pull the carbon out of the air.  It has to.  That's the environmentalist formula.  They just don't want to admit the Earth has that built into I.

GLENN:  Congressman, best of luck to you, my friend.

KING:  Glad to be with you today.  Thank you.

Legal scholar and famed criminal defense attorney Alan Dershowitz has a message for partisans dividing America: "A plague on both your houses." He voted for Hillary Clinton. He endorsed Joe Biden. He's a man who is basically the Forrest Gump of American judicial history.

Look up a big court case over the past few decades, and you'll probably see him standing in the background. He's represented notorious clients like Mike Tyson, Patty Hearst, Harry Reems, Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, and yes, Donald Trump. It's made him a target for both the left and right.

Alan also describes himself as a "civil libertarian," and that's probably why he and Glenn Beck get along despite their opposing political views. His story is like a history lesson, spanning half a century, and it just might be the key to bridging the political divide.

On this week's podcast, Alan explained that while he's a strong defender of the Constitution, he's never been a big fan of the Second Amendment. In the past he's called it absurd and outdated, and even today, he admits that he wouldn't have ingrained it into our Constitution if he was a framer. However, with the whole Bill of Rights under attack, he's now fully in defense of our right to bear arms. Because if the Second Amendment changes, any amendment could be next.

"I'm now a supporter of the Second Amendment. I don't want to change it. I don't want to change one word of it, because I'm afraid that if I get to change the Second Amendment, other people will get to change the First Amendment, and the Fifth Amendment," Alan said. "So, I am committed to preserving the Bill of Rights, every single word, every comma, and every space between the words."

Watch a clip from the full interview with Alan Dershowitz below:

Watch the full podcast below, on Glenn's YouTube channel, or on Blaze Media's podcast network.

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Investigative reporter David Steinberg joined the radio program Monday, to explain how a new video may provide enough evidence to begin a FBI investigation into alleged illegal practices by Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar's campaign.

In the video, which was produced and released by Project Veritas, residents of Omar's community describe campaign teams that not only conduct illegal ballot harvesting practices but also pay people for their blank absentee ballots.

Steinberg told Glenn that, if these charges prove to be true, the federal government could bypass Omar's friend and protector, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison. Could 2020 be the beginning of the end for Omar's political career?

Watch the video below to catch Glenn's conversation with David Steinberg:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Mike Fratantuono is the manager of Sunset Restaurant in Glen Burnie, Maryland. He wrote in the Washington Post's COVID-19 series about the recent, heartbreaking loss of his business, a restaurant that has been in his family for "four generations and counting."

"I know this virus is real, okay? It's real and it's awful. I'm not disputing any of that," Mike wrote. "But our national hysteria is worse. We allowed the virus to take over our economy, our small businesses, our schools, our social lives, our whole quality of life. We surrendered, and now everything is infected."

On the radio program Monday, Glenn Beck reacted to Mike's letter, which he shared in full, adding his hope that those in government are ultimately held responsible for what he called the biggest theft of the Western world.

"This is the biggest theft of, not only money, but of heritage and of hope," Glenn said. "The United States government and many of the states are responsible for this, not you. And hopefully someday soon, we'll return to some semblance of sanity, and those responsible for this theft, this rape of the Western world, will be held responsible."

Watch the video below for more details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

We did our homework over the weekend; we did the research so we can tell you what is likely coming from Senate Democrats regarding President Trump's Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett. Based on our research and the anonymous people who have already come forward to talk about Coney Barrett's youth, these are the main shocking things you can expect Senate Democrats to seize on during the confirmation process…

A man has come forward under the banner of "#MenToo," to say that in second grade, Amy Coney Barrett and her best friend at the time, cornered him at a birthday party at Chuck-E-Cheese and "injected him with a full dose of cooties." Which, if true, would obviously be disqualifying for serving on the highest court in the land.

Then there's a woman who says when she was nine-years-old, she lived on the same street as Amy Coney Barrett. She alleges that Coney-Barrett borrowed her VHS tape of Herbie Goes Bananas and did not return it for at least six months. And then when she did finally get the tape back, the woman says Coney Barrett did not even bother to rewind it. The FBI has interviewed at least two witnesses so far who say the tape was indeed not rewound and that it was very upsetting to the owner of the tape. Again, if true, this is troubling – clearly not the kind of integrity you want to see in a Supreme Court justice.

Apparently, in their elementary school days, they liked to drink milk – and lots of it.

The same neighbor also dropped a bombshell allegation about the drinking problem of Amy Coney Barrett and her closest friends. Apparently, in their elementary school days, they liked to drink milk – and lots of it. The neighbor says she "frequently" witnessed Coney-Barrett and her friends chugging entire cartons of milk – often Whole Milk, sometimes Chocolate Milk, occasionally both at the same time through a funnel.

Unfortunately, shooting-up cooties, injurious rewinding, and potential calcium-abuse are not even the worst of it.

A third person has now come forward, another man, and this is just reprehensible, it's hard to even fathom. But he alleges that in fourth grade, when they were around ten-years-old, Amy Coney Barrett and a group of "four or five of her friends" gang-GRAPED him on the playground during recess. He alleges the group of friends snuck uneaten grapes out of the cafeteria and gang-GRAPED him repeatedly in broad daylight. In other words, and I hate to have to spell this out because it's kind of graphic, but the group led by ten-year-old Amy Coney Barrett pelted this poor defenseless boy with whole grapes. He recalls them "laughing the whole time" as they were gang-GRAPING him.

He recalls them "laughing the whole time" as they were gang-GRAPING him.

Obviously, even if just one of these allegations is half-true, no Senator with a conscience could possibly vote to confirm Coney Barrett. When there is a clear pattern of destructive childhood behavior, it always continues into adulthood. Because people do not change. Ever.

Fortunately, for the sake of the Republic, Democrats plan to subpoena Coney Barrett's childhood diary, to see what, if any, insights it may provide into her calcium habits, as well as her abuse of illicit cooties and the gang-GRAPING incident.

We will keep you posted on the latest, but for now, it looks like Democrats will find plenty in the reckless pre-teen life of Amy Coney Barrett to cast doubt on her nomination. And if not, they can always fall back on her deranged preference for letting babies be born.

[NOTE: The preceding was a parody written by MRA writer Nathan Nipper.]