Glenn interviews Romney on economics


Mitt Romney

GLENN: Welcome to the program. Third most listened to from Manhattan. My name is Glenn Beck. Glad you're here. Mitt Romney is a guy that has been a CEO, gets it, understands the economy unlike any other people that I hear talking, even the current CEOs I'm thinking, what are they even saying. Mitt Romney, welcome to the program. How are you, sir?

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: I'm terrific, Glenn. Thank you.

GLENN: Can you please help tell me and everybody else what the heck is even going on? What is this and what does this mean to the average person?

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: Well, the good news is that bank accounts are insured, brokerage accounts are held in people's names and to the extent they're not, they're also insured. So people don't need to worry about losing their money as they see the topsy turvy things going on in Wall Street. But what's happening is that over the past several years with interest rates extremely low, held artificially low and with mortgage banks and by the way, politicians of Republican and Democratic stripe alike all saying give money out to people so they can buy homes, mortgage money was handed out like candy and the result of this was homes were being bought like crazy and now people are finding they can't make the payments and so what you have on your hand is a housing crisis and a mortgage crisis, where the mortgages are not being paid back and so the institutions which hold those mortgages or have guarantees on them are finding themselves in trouble and they're going under one by one. And the government is having to step in to make sure that the well, not that their shareholders are protected but rather make sure that the public is protected.

GLENN: I heard a former Fed chair say this morning that he thinks this is it, this is it. Now we're now it's going take us about two years to dig our way out but this is the last shoe to drop. Do you buy that at all?

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: It's possible. You know, the strange thing about recessions is that as Alan Greenspan has pointed out, they are oftentimes caused by a healthy dose of irrational behavior and you never know what irrational behavior's going to do. It's hard to predict. But, you know, I think with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac now in stable hands and with this AIG picture behind us, there's a real good shot that we won't see major financial institutions like this in trouble. But, of course, we're going to have banks go under. We usually have about 100 banks a year that go under in this country. We'll have at least that many this year and there will be plenty for the media to write about that will be scary but, you know, we can hope that and I think we have a good prospect of believing that the worst is behind us in terms of these financial institution bankruptcies.

GLENN: Here we are, we get up this morning and I think, oh, wow, this is fantastic, we own an insurance company now, and the largest one in the world. This is great. We seem to be in an acquisition mode that makes me slightly uncomfortable. Meanwhile Pelosi and Reid are politicking for a new federal agency whose job would be to buy bad assets from corporations. This is where are we getting this money?

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: Well, actually the it was something I recommended about a year and a half ago, something similar which was, look, there ought to be a voluntary effort where people that are holding these mortgages or banks that are holding these mortgages or other investors could contribute them to an entity, contribute them to the entity and then the entity goes out and tries to collect what they can and ultimately sends the money back to whoever contributed it and

GLENN: Wait, wait, wait. That's a federal agency you wanted to create?

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: I wanted to make that a very private and voluntary effort on the part of institutions.

GLENN: Right.

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: And so that was a way to go. What you don't want to have happen and is what's happening right now which is that let's say one bank holds a piece of debt from General Motors and that bank is in overnight trouble, disaster. They have to sell that piece of paper they got from General Motors for 10 cents on the dollar. Well, because we have a rule that says everybody that holds that same paper must mark to market, they all write down that General Motors paper to 10 cents and that causes all of their balance sheets to be in trouble. Some of our rules just don't make sense in this kind of a, kind of a panic selling setting where some institutions are selling well below the true value of their asset.

GLENN: You said just a little while ago, and it just I mean, I tell you, Mitt, I think this is the winning strategy and I think it's because you mean it and I think Sarah Palin means it and I hope John McCain means it. This is not a Democratic problem. This is a Republican and Democratic. This is a Washington problem.

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: Yeah, you're absolutely right on this. We watched people on both sides of the aisle celebrate as mortgages were being given out and being backed by the federal government through effectively Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, mortgages were being given out to people who didn't have to show they had the ability to pay, people who didn't have to put a down payment down, people who were getting interest only mortgages with a variable rate. We were celebrating that. Republicans and Democrats were celebrating it, and it led to a bubble, overwhelmingly high prices and some mortgages out there that weren't worth very much and that's all coming home to roost and, you know, shame on the people who were encouraging it. And there's plenty of blame to go around. It's not one party or the other. And it's Wall Street, it's Main Street, it's homeowners, it's mortgage banks, it's bankers, it's regulators and it's Republicans and Democrats alike. So, you know, let's stop worrying about who's to blame. Let's worry instead about what you do to fix it and how to get our economy growing again.

GLENN: Okay.

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: And there's where John McCain's right. Hold down taxes, keep trade open with other nations and stop sending billions of dollars every day out of our country to buy oil.

GLENN: Yesterday Joe Biden said that, you know, Obama was going to hike the taxes over, anyone over $250,000. He said no economist has ever said that's bad for the economy. Meanwhile Barack Obama's tax plan and I just figured this one out he wants to raise the minimum wage yet again but in a different way. He is going to give tax rebate checks to anyone who is making minimum wage of up to $1100 a year. What do these two things do to our economy?

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: Well, first of all, raising taxes on anyone, even though sometimes it's popular to raise taxes on your enemy, but raising taxes on anyone is never good for the economy. It takes money out of the free economy, it takes money out of investment funds which can be used to create new enterprises and create jobs and puts it in government's hands. And that's not good for the economy. Around the world the nations that have low taxes like Ireland, for instance, are growing like crazy and those with high taxes like Japan and us are having a much more difficult time. So raising taxes is never good. And, you know, right now there are about 40% of Americans that pay no income tax at all, none, and at some point you say, you know, isn't it appropriate that everybody pay something, that there's a fair share. And if Barack Obama wants to basically pay off voters in saying, look, all you guys, I'm going to give you checks and take money away from the wealthiest Americans, it's a politics of envy that I just don't think works economically and I don't think it will work politically.

GLENN: The headline today is Carly Fiorina, CEO of HP, she said this is the headline that Palin and McCain are not qualified to be CEOs. What she actually said is none of the four are qualified to be CEOs. You're a CEO. You're a very successful businessman. Any of them qualified to be CEOs?

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: Look, I would be happy to have John McCain and Sarah Palin as CEOs of enterprises I've invested in over the years and there's no question that they have executive and leadership experience. I have to tell you that Barack Obama and Joe Biden are a little more difficult for me to assess because neither one has really ever had a leadership responsibility. So I'm not going to opine on those two, but John McCain and Sarah Palin I'd be happy to hire them.

GLENN: What is the have you met Sarah Palin?

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: I sure have.

GLENN: What do you think of her personally? Do you think she's did you see Batman by any did you see Batman?

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: Of course I haven't seen the latest. I saw the earlier. I saw the earlier Batman.

GLENN: The last Batman and I hate to wreck the ending for you but the last Batman is the guy that everybody thinks is good actually turns bad and Batman says you are going to have to blame it all on me because we have to have somebody we can believe in. Sarah Palin seems to me to be a genuine reformer, somebody that will take on her own party, take the beam out of her own party's eye first and that's what America is looking for right now and that's exactly what we mean or what we need. Do you believe she is and has the spine to remain who we think she is?

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: Well, I believe she does, and frankly I believe John McCain does. Look, over the years John McCain has made a lot of Republicans mad. He's probably made this President mad. We don't have tapes of the White House like we used to in the Nixon days but my guess is there's been an expletive or two expressed in John McCain's direction when he voted against Bush on issue after issue and, you know, you want that kind of backbone. You want a person who will explain why they don't agree with something and who will stand their ground and not just do what their party tells them to do, and John McCain has done that, Sarah Palin has done it, and I think you'll see if those two are in the White House and working together, you're going to see them dramatically change the way government works in Washington. And it will be painful will for a lot of people, but you're going to hear a lot of screaming from the fat cats, from the lobbyists, a lot of screaming from congressmen who want pork projects from their home district and McCain's going to stare them down and say no way.

GLENN: Mitt Romney, thanks.

GOVERNOR ROMNEY: You bet, Glenn, bye bye.

The Biden Admin EXPANDED abortion access because they DON'T believe in the Constitution

Joshua Lott / Stringer, JOSEPH PREZIOSO / Contributor | Getty Images

This month has already produced an extreme example of why we need a functional and more conservative Congress in order for America to have a chance at moving forward—because the Left does not believe in the Constitution.

Sure, if you confronted a Democrat in Congress, they would probably claim some sort of allegiance to the Constitution—but as a practical matter, they do not believe in it.

Instead, the Left has put all of their eggs in the basket of the executive branch. Why? Because it has the furthest reach through all the various departments, and it can move the fastest—in short, because it’s the most dictatorial. It only takes a department head to write a new memo, or even better, the President to sign a new executive order to carry the force of law.

The Left has put all of their eggs in the basket of the executive branch.

Do you recall any of the Left’s favorite Supreme Court decisions over the years—something like gay marriage for example—and how Republicans immediately tried to subvert it, using the executive branch to try to nullify the decision? Yeah, that never happened. But that is exactly what Democrats have done in recent weeks to expand abortion access.

Democrats only consider the Supreme Court legitimate when they approve of the decisions. When the miraculous overturning of Roe v. Wade happened last summer, President Biden called it “a realization of an extreme ideology and a tragic error by the Supreme Court.”

Democrats only consider the Supreme Court legitimate when they approve of the decisions.

Recently the FDA approved local pharmacies to issue abortion pills. For the first 20 years after these pills were developed, they were not treated like typical prescription drugs. They had to be dispensed in-person by a doctor. That in-person requirement is now gone.

Keep in mind that the Left’s go-to line is that abortion is always about the health and safety of women, yet a 2021 peer-reviewed study found that chemical abortions have a complication rate four times greater than surgical abortions. Between 2002 and 2015, the rate of abortion-related ER visits following use of the abortion pills increased by 507 percent.

Chemical abortions have a complication rate four times greater than surgical abortions.

And now the Biden administration is making these less-safe abortions much more accessible. Thanks to the FDA’s rule change, Walgreens and CVS have already agreed to dispense abortion pills in states where abortion is legal—effectively turning these stores into new abortion clinics.

As for states that have abortion bans, "Team Biden" announced a new way around those too. Three weeks ago, the Justice Department issued a legal opinion that the U.S. Postal Service is allowed to deliver abortion pills anywhere, even in places where abortion is illegal. What’s their rationale? That the sender cannot know for sure whether the recipient will use the pills illegally or not. So it’s totally okay.

The U.S. Postal Service is allowed to deliver abortion pills anywhere, even in places where abortion is illegal.

Georgetown Law professor Lawrence Gostin told the Washington Post that this Justice Department opinion is “a major expansion of abortion access in the United States.”

So, to recap—the Biden administration has used the FDA, the Justice Department, and the Post Office, which all fall under the executive branch, to provide an end-run around the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson decision.

Expanding abortion was easy—simple policy tweaks and declarations that carry the force of law without an ounce of input from actual lawmakers in Congress—all because it comes from the grotesque, bloated, apparently pro-death executive branch.

Glenn is one of the most outspoken critics of the World Economic Forum and their vision to use crises to reconstruct the world order known as The Great Reset. The recent WEF summit in Davos confirms what Glenn has long warned about: globalist elites seek to upend our democracy, freedoms, and way of life to achieve their utopian climate goals. Here are 15 quotes from the 2023 Davos Summit, revealing their true intentions in their own words:

1. Saving the planet

When you hear the word, "Davos," the first thought that should pop into your mind is an elite group getting together to save the world from imminent climate disaster... at least they think of themselves that way. According to John Kerry:

I mean, it's so almost extraterrestrial to think about saving the planet.

2. Private jets

What most people think when they hear the word "Davos" is a group of global elites flying in on private jets to talk about climate change... and yes, John Kerry does own a private jet, no matter how many times he denies it:

I fly commercial [...] Exclusively.

3. Global Collaboration Village

You always hear some weird, dystopian projects coming out of WEF, like "The Global Collaboration Village," a new metaverse community aimed at strengthening "global cooperation." It sounds like the next installment of Brave New World. According to Klaus Schwab, Founder and President of the WEF:

The Global Collaboration Village is the pioneering effort to use the metaverse for public good, to create global cooperation and to strengthen global cooperation in the metaverse or using metaverse technologies. For me, it's a dream coming true because the village allows the Forum to create a more larger and open platform where everybody can participate.

4. Climate revolution

However, the core theme throughout WEF summits is the immediate need for a climate revolution and how businesses are selfishly blocking the revolution because they want to make an extra buck. Here's how John Kerry summed up the sentiment:

How do we get there? The lesson I have learned in the last years [...] is money, money, money, money, money, money, money.

5. Do or die

This often turns into alarmist language, like having to choose between wealth and our planet's survival... Joyeeta Gupta, Professor of Environment and Development in the Global South at University of Amsterdam, said it eloquently:

If we do the minimum at this pivotable moment in our history, then we and our children – even if we are rich – will live in the danger zone. But if we – business people, governments, citizens, cities – take action today, then we and our children will have a future worth looking forward to.

6. Colossal risks

Potsdam Institute's director Johan Rockström, used similar language, claiming we are "taking colossal risks with the future of civilization":

We are taking colossal risks with the future of civilization on Earth, we are degrading the life support systems that we all depend on, we are actually pushing the entire Earth system to a point of destabilization, pushing Earth outside of the state that has supported civilization since we left the last Ice Age 10,000 years ago.

7. Rain bombs

"Colossal risks" like... rain bombs? We didn't make that up. Ask Al Gore:

That’s what’s boiling the oceans, creating these atmospheric rivers, and the rain bombs.

Courtesy of the World Economic Forum

8. Survival comes down to this

How do we secure our survival? According to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, we have to "end our addiction to fossil fuels." This entails wiping out our entire energy industry, displacing millions of workers, and relying on global governments to usher in a new green industry. In his words:

So, we need to act together to close the emissions gap, and that means to phase out progressively coal and supercharge the renewable revolution, to end the addiction to fossil fuels, and to stop our self-defeating war on nature.

9. Complete transformation

It isn't hyperbolic to argue that the globalist climate goals will completely transform the world economy. Even EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen admitted:

The net-zero transformation is already causing huge industrial, economic and geopolitical shifts – by far the quickest and the most pronounced in our lifetime. It is changing the nature of work and the shape of our industry.

10. Scientific necessity

Of course, to bring about this "net-zero" transformation, we will have to override small, "political expediencies" like democracy to do what is "scientifically necessary." According to Zurich Insurance Group’s head of sustainability risk John Scott:

We’re living in a world right now where what’s scientifically necessary, and what is politically expedient don’t match.

11. Illegal hate speech

Doing away with "political expediencies" would also require the censorship of dissent, which would likely manifest in hate-speech laws. When asked by Brian Stelter how the discussion of disinformation relates to everything else happening today in Davos, European Commission VP Věra Jourová shared this prediction:

Illegal hate speech, which you will have soon also in the U.S. I think that we have a strong reason why we have this in the criminal law.

12. Climate first

We will also have to forego national interests on the international stage. America won't be able to advocate for policies and interests that benefit Americans. Instead, we will sacrifice national interests for the sake of global climate interests. French economy minister Bruno Le Maire said:

The key question is not China First, US First, Europe First. The key question for all of us is Climate First.

13. The role of war

We can also expect globalist leaders to use crises, like the war in Ukraine, to expedite the "net-zero transformation." Chancellor of Germany Olaf Scholz said:

Ultimately, our goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2045 has been given an additional boost by Putin’s war. Now we have even more cause to move away from fossil fuels.

14. Blame game

Globalist leaders will continue to blame ALL of the crises in our society on climate change to justify the "net-zero transition," from the energy shortage to "mistrust, selfishness [and] xenophobia." Prime Minister of Spain Pedro Sanchez said:

Our present struggle is not only against Putin or the energy shortage. It is also against fear, mistrust, selfishness, xenophobia, and environmental disaster. And its outcome will define life in the West and beyond for decades to come.

15. Sacrifice for the greater good

While we sacrifice our national interests for the sake of the "greater global good," we can expect our foreign enemies, like China, to benefit. Suisse Chairman Axel Lehmann said:

The growth forecasts now for China is 4.5%. I would not personally be surprised when that would be topped.

Conclusion

Glenn has been clear about the distinction between wanting to transition to green practices on your own accord and being forced into that transition by globalist, unelected elites. Leaders at Davos will continue to use alarmist language to justify their crackdown on democracy and freedom to bring about their leftist utopia. We have to cut through the alarmist language and in order to protect our freedoms.

Glenn has focused on exposing the dark side of the gender movements waging our culture war, and now, there's a new "trend" emerging as an offshoot to the transgender movement. A growing online community, particularly of men, who consider themselves "involuntarily celibate" or "incels" believe they can live a better life as a trans woman. Why? This community purports the world is rigged against men, particularly against traditionally "unattractive men." What's the solution? Stop being a man...

Incel or "involutarily celibate" communities have existed online in the dark corners of Reddit and Discord for years. The groups are marked by a hatred towards women, blaming them for rigging the world in their favor and denying them of sex. Several members of this growing community have been responsible for large acts of violence, most notably Alek Minassian, who killed 10 and injured 16 after driving a van into a busy area of Toronto in 2021.

However, the transgender movement has presented a new option for incel members: if you can't beat 'em, join 'em... or, in the Transmaxxers' case, "become them."

The online Transmaxxer's Manifesto says, “Since females have the upper hand on the dating market, transitioning from male to female will usually improve your options when it comes to getting sex.” According to the manifesto, transitioning to female not only opens up a different pool of sexual partners, but moreover, you gain access to female-only spaces and are “able to extract resources from males.”

“Since females have the upper hand on the dating market, transitioning from male to female will usually improve your options when it comes to getting sex.”

Another member wrote, "If you do not currently feel like living as a female you might have to work on fixing that ... Identifying as male or being emotionally attached to a male body is bad for you if being male results in you living a bad life.”

This new movement is significant because it is in stark contrast to the mainstream narrative that "transgenderism" is an innate quality. Now, it can be an "option" people choose for social advantage. A moderator going by the alias “Vintologi” on the Transmaxxing Discord server, which boasts over 1,200 members, told The Daily Caller:

Transmaxxing is about transitioning for personal gain rather than focusing on things like "gender identity." ... What matters when it comes to medical transition is whether or not said transition would actually be beneficial, thus the extent to which gender identity is innate does not inform us much regarding when medical transition is appropriate.

One incel member on Reddit lamented that he can't Transmaxx to "have sex with white trans women" and to have "all the benefits of [being] female."

Transmaxxing sheds light on a concerning issue as an increasing number of people, particularly the youth, identify as "transgender." What used to be considered as a "finge case" is now being seen as a social advantage. Glenn recently sat down with de-transitioner Chloe Cole, and the amount of pressure she experienced to become a transgender man AS A TEENAGER was ASTOUNDING. She discussed the new community, friendships, and affirmation she gained when she started her transition journey, and she lost ALL of those social perks when she began de-transitioning. She exchanged affirmation for death-threats, friendships for stone-cold silence.

Transmaxxing is a very specific example of a larger movement that is deeply concerning. Not only is the thansgender ideology problematic on its own merits, but now, we are seeing a rise of a distinction of "social advantage" based on gender affiliation. This is deviating away from the original notion that transgenderism is an innate quality. Now, many consider it more "socially advantageous" to identify as transgender than with your biological gender.

At the same time President Biden's misplaced classified documents were sitting in his house, garage, and office at the Penn Biden Center, a whole lot of Chinese money was flowing around him. Is this just a coincidence, or did the Chinese get anything in return? Investigative journalist John Solomon joins to break down what was going on here ...

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.