Glenn Beck: Time to act



Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg

GLENN: Good friend of the program, Jonah Goldberg. Hello, Jonah.

GOLDBERG: Hello, sir, how are you?

GLENN: Well, I'm pretty good. I'm pretty good. I'm -- as we talked yesterday or last night, I'm a little, I guess shocked how many people are trapped in this place of, "Okay, well, I guess I'll go down the socialist route just a little bit because I don't want something really, really bad to happen." And you are a guy who is -- I mean, you wrote one of my favorite books, Liberal Fascism, that somebody asked me just the other day, Glenn, I want to read about socialism, where do I start. And I said, only one place to start, Liberal Fascism.

GOLDBERG: See, now you are guilting me.

GLENN: I'm just playing the role of the administration or Nancy Pelosi. Just trying to guilt you into it. Yet you know that this is really bad for us. If this bill would have come through, you know this was really bad.

GOLDBERG: I agree the bill is really bad, I agree. I think there are all sorts of saner things that could be done. I'm not saying that we wouldn't need to spend some large amount of money in some way down the road, but this doesn't strike me as the way to do it. I guess my problem is I am just so frustrated with this entire mess. The rank hypocrisy and corruption all over the place that, you know -- and while my heart is entirely with the Mike Pences and free market guys and the House Republicans, you know, Republicans ran the congress for most of the last eight years and they let Barney Frank, they get Chris Dodd play the games that they played that got us into this mess. They didn't fight Bush on prescription drugs, they didn't fight Bush on all sorts of things and now with the place burning down around them, they've become purists about enforcing the fire codes and --

GLENN: Here's what I -- I mean, Jonah, here's -- I'm with you that I can't take the hypocrisy. I can't look at Barney Frank anymore. I can't, I can't take it.

GOLDBERG: I almost think the guy should be in jail.

GLENN: Oh, I do, too. I absolutely do. Honestly I think we should have at least, bare minimum we should have stockades in front of the capitol building. Some of these people are out and out criminal on what they have done. I had -- who was it yesterday -- Senator DeMint that said this -- this is a quote from a U.S. senator: This government has betrayed the American people. And nobody's going down that road. But here's my problem, Jonah, and how do you say, how do you give the same exact people $770 billion? They say they can fix it. They created it and they won't even admit to it.

GOLDBERG: They made this problem when they created Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Those things have our implied -- I mean us taxpayers, the few of us who are left, we're going to be paying those taxes in chickens any day now. We gave our implied support for these things when we created those institutions. And in the 1990s and the early 2000s, those institutions went off the rails. And so the taxpayers are legitimately on the hook for it. I don't mind -- I mean, of course I mind, but I can stomach the spending of the money if I think it's going to work because essentially it was -- you know, the government created this problem. The taxpayers are on the hook for what the government does and the government has to honor its obligations.

GLENN: Right.

GOLDBERG: The government made these obligations. I agree with you it's annoying to empower the same class that created these problems but the next class that's about to come in is even worse. I mean, the Pelosi, Reid, Obama guys are poised to take over and those guys are going to -- as we've talked about it a million times, they really do want a new New Deal. So when I agree with you, look, it's just -- you know, John Boehner said this bill was a crap sandwich but he was going to eat it. As far as I'm concerned, it's crap sandwiches for as far as the eye can see.

GLENN: It really, truly is crap sandwiches for as far as the eye can see. Let me ask you this: When was the last time you saw the President of the United States make this kind of effort, with a speech last Thursday, then a speech to Wall Street Friday morning, one yesterday morning, another one today with these dire, dire warnings and yet they're still saying, well, it would be a recession. How many recessions have we gone through, Jonah? We keep going through recessions. We don't have this.

GOLDBERG: Look, I think, you know, John McCain got a bad rap a couple of weeks ago when he said the fundamentals of this economy were strong. He probably shouldn't have said it politically, it was probably a dumb idea but once he said it, he should not have let Obama beat him up on it. Because in the middle of a panic, you are not supposed to spread panic. FDR, one of the few things he really did, the only thing we have to fear is fear itself, and all that kind of thing. And Obama took the juvenile position that the thing to do in the middle of a panic is to scream fire. So I don't fault Bush for, you know, trying to sort of skirt the line.

GLENN: I agree.

GOLDBERG: Between stability and scare mongering but it's a difficult line to cross.

GLENN: Right, and I'm not asking you, I'm not asking you about that because I don't think the President has a choice. But this is the fundamental problem that we have in the United States of America and no bailout of any size is going to correct this. When John McCain was talking about the fundamentals of the economy are strong, I believe what he means is the average person, the average person is the engine of the economy and I know that's -- I think that's what he said a couple of days later. But it's true, the entrepreneur is fine if you just get out of his way.

GOLDBERG: Yeah, productivity, the worker productivity which really is the fundamental engine of all prosperity is actually doing pretty good.

GLENN: Right. But the problem is, the fundamental problem is trust.

GOLDBERG: Yeah.

GLENN: The President no longer can say -- he can't say how bad it really is because he's the President. You can't scare the market. You can't scare people in that. But nobody believes anybody in congress. Nobody believes anybody in the White House. Nobody believes anybody in Wall Street. Nobody believes anything because we have been lied to over and over again. So Jonah, how do you get the word out when -- and this is a problem I've been facing now for two years. How do you get the problem out and really vocalize when no one is trustworthy?

GOLDBERG: Look, I agree it's an enormous problem. Look at John McCain, right? He suspends his campaign and comes to Washington because the Democratic leadership said we need John McCain here to get a deal worked out. John McCain suspends his campaign, comes to Washington and they ride him out on a rail, they ridicule it as a stunt and the press openly and without reservation flies into the bald Democratic lie that there was a deal already nailed down just so they can make it look like John McCain blew up the deal. Now, you disagree with the deal, but there was no deal and you disagree with McCain's position on this.

GLENN: Right.

GOLDBERG: But McCain is the only guy in his entire political class, in the top tier political class that wants to treat this crisis like a crisis and the media and the Democrats joined forces to ridicule and belittle him as some sort of fool. It is an incredibly poisonous situation. You know, in the middle ages Harry Reid would have his stomach cut open and a half starved weasel thrown in for the kind of things he's doing.

GLENN: Got to blame it on living in the Dark Ages now. Okay, so help me out. Because I was watching TV early this morning. I turned on the TV and I'm getting ready for work and I see Nancy Pelosi give that speech and then I see Harry Reid say something and then Barney Frank said something and they are all blaming this on, "There was absolutely no standards here. They were trying to stop regulation." Well, there's no regulation on the hedge funds and nobody seems to have a problem with that one and that thing's going to come apart anytime. It was not a Republican stop regulation thing. It started as a Democrat, "We're going to call you a racist if you don't make these loans to people," and continued on with a Republican administration that did the same damn thing. How can you get that down to the average person so they can understand when the media is not reporting this at all.

GOLDBERG: No, look, I agree entirely on it. It is outrageous that Christopher Dodd and Barney Frank have been going around saying this is the failure of the free market. You know, Christopher Dodd said, "Oh, we didn't have enough oversight." He is the chairman of the banking committee! His job is to run oversight of the banking industry! It is amazing that these guys can say this stuff with a straight face. You would think the press pool would just dive for cover for fear of God's lightning bolts coming down to smite fees people for their effrontery. And yet it is par for the course. Everyone's talking about, you know, you tell a lot about people by how they sort of interpret facts that bolster their own ideological, you know, preconceptions, and that happens on the right and the left. But it is amazing that after Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac came up with all of these bizarre ways of slicing and dicing mortgages into ever more complicated schemes in order to personally enrich Franklin Raines nearly to the tune of $100 million that people are saying, oh, this has something to do with the inherent failures of the free enterprise system. The Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac stuff that Barney Frank and Christopher Dodd and these guys champion, distorted the market. And yes, there were bad actors on Wall Street who did bad things who, you know, who took the lead of government and personally enriched themselves, and shame on them. But the market was screwed up by these guys who want to sort of rate banks not on the soundness of their loans but on their social conscience in terms of giving out money to groups like ACORN and historically, you know, aggrieved and disadvantaged groups, which is not the way proper business runs. And now we're living with this enormous mess and these guys want to use it as an excuse to turn the entire financial system into the Fannie Mae of their dreams. And it is a really scary situation.

GLENN: Jonah Goldberg, in your book Liberal Fascism, you talk about the -- you know, you talk about how all of this started, that the New Deal was started way before, just a different mindset and how America changed its mindset. There are two kinds of Americas now. There are the Americans that are the traditional Americans that are like, get the heck out of my way and I don't want a handout and I never ask you for a handout. And then there are those Americans who are saying, well, they're bailing them out; how come they won't bail me out. Now, I would say that as a, you know, to make a point, they are not coming to bail me out but I would never want them to bail me out. But a growing number of Americans want that bailout. A, do you think this is a slam dunk now for Barack Obama because the tide is moving towards, I want somebody to hold my hand and, you know, scratch my back and prop my feet up on a pillow and big government's the one to do it; and B, what do you think about the new New Deal? What is coming our way?

GOLDBERG: Well, I think you are right. History quickly. Woodrow Wilson creates more during World War I. FDR says we were onto something with socialism during World War I, let's do that to fight the Great Depression. The New Deal prolongs the Great Depression rather than fight the Great Depression. It extends the shelf life of the Depression by years. Europe's Depressions weren't great in the 1930s. Only America's was. What FDR's revolutionary tactic in American politics was to change citizens who had rights and freedoms that were independent of government, to clients of a government that would give them everything that they need. And now we've got a sizable number of Americans who think that the government is their mommy or daddy and that they should be the government's trust fund babies and get all sorts of stuff from the government. And I think that Obama fits entirely within that tradition, the way he talks about, you know, unity and how we all have to sort of, you know, be on the same page and if you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem and, you know, how his wife talks about he is going to fix our broken souls and all these sorts of things. He comes explicitly from that same perspective and says that we're going to turn all Americans basically into clients of the state. Doesn't necessarily mean we're going to live in a Nazi dictatorship or anything like that but he no longer views -- you know, in his speech at the Democratic convention he very straightforwardly ridiculed the idea of the American dream -- or replaced the idea of the American dream with what he calls the idea of the American promise, and the American promise is a collectivist vision where everybody gets their payday from the government rather than the American dream where every individual gets to pursue happiness as they see fit.

GLENN: I'm sure you know this, Jonah, but he's going to be the first -- this is part of his deal. He is going to be the first person ever to, when you get -- if you didn't pay taxes, you're going to get a rebate check from the IRS, but you're going to have a letter that comes from President Obama that says, this is your check, this is your money, this is the American promise. He's going to be the first one that is actually issuing checks for those who, on a regular basis, that did not pay taxes.

GOLDBERG: No, that's right. I mean, Obama has half a point when he says the people do pay sales taxes and all the rest. But when he calls these things a tax cut, you know, it's an incredibly simplistic but brilliant marketing because basically what he's doing is just giving these people cash and saying, here, I've cut your taxes. I think the best single fundamental reform for our country would simply be no more paycheck withholding, no more sales tax. If you want to keep the income tax, fine, but once a year you write out your check to the federal government so it really distinction and on the back you'll vote for who you want for President in congress. And if people have to pay their taxes in one lump sum and vote on the same day, we would have limited government in this country.

GLENN: You ain't kidding. You are not kidding. Jonah, thanks very much. I appreciate it. We'll talk to you again.

Glenn has focused on exposing the dark side of the gender movements waging our culture war, and now, there's a new "trend" emerging as an offshoot to the transgender movement. A growing online community, particularly of men, who consider themselves "involuntarily celibate" or "incels" believe they can live a better life as a trans woman. Why? This community purports the world is rigged against men, particularly against traditionally "unattractive men." What's the solution? Stop being a man...

Incel or "involutarily celibate" communities have existed online in the dark corners of Reddit and Discord for years. The groups are marked by a hatred towards women, blaming them for rigging the world in their favor and denying them of sex. Several members of this growing community have been responsible for large acts of violence, most notably Alek Minassian, who killed 10 and injured 16 after driving a van into a busy area of Toronto in 2021.

However, the transgender movement has presented a new option for incel members: if you can't beat 'em, join 'em... or, in the Transmaxxers' case, "become them."

The online Transmaxxer's Manifesto says, “Since females have the upper hand on the dating market, transitioning from male to female will usually improve your options when it comes to getting sex.” According to the manifesto, transitioning to female not only opens up a different pool of sexual partners, but moreover, you gain access to female-only spaces and are “able to extract resources from males.”

“Since females have the upper hand on the dating market, transitioning from male to female will usually improve your options when it comes to getting sex.”

Another member wrote, "If you do not currently feel like living as a female you might have to work on fixing that ... Identifying as male or being emotionally attached to a male body is bad for you if being male results in you living a bad life.”

This new movement is significant because it is in stark contrast to the mainstream narrative that "transgenderism" is an innate quality. Now, it can be an "option" people choose for social advantage. A moderator going by the alias “Vintologi” on the Transmaxxing Discord server, which boasts over 1,200 members, told The Daily Caller:

Transmaxxing is about transitioning for personal gain rather than focusing on things like "gender identity." ... What matters when it comes to medical transition is whether or not said transition would actually be beneficial, thus the extent to which gender identity is innate does not inform us much regarding when medical transition is appropriate.

One incel member on Reddit lamented that he can't Transmaxx to "have sex with white trans women" and to have "all the benefits of [being] female."

Transmaxxing sheds light on a concerning issue as an increasing number of people, particularly the youth, identify as "transgender." What used to be considered as a "finge case" is now being seen as a social advantage. Glenn recently sat down with de-transitioner Chloe Cole, and the amount of pressure she experienced to become a transgender man AS A TEENAGER was ASTOUNDING. She discussed the new community, friendships, and affirmation she gained when she started her transition journey, and she lost ALL of those social perks when she began de-transitioning. She exchanged affirmation for death-threats, friendships for stone-cold silence.

Transmaxxing is a very specific example of a larger movement that is deeply concerning. Not only is the thansgender ideology problematic on its own merits, but now, we are seeing a rise of a distinction of "social advantage" based on gender affiliation. This is deviating away from the original notion that transgenderism is an innate quality. Now, many consider it more "socially advantageous" to identify as transgender than with your biological gender.

At the same time President Biden's misplaced classified documents were sitting in his house, garage, and office at the Penn Biden Center, a whole lot of Chinese money was flowing around him. Is this just a coincidence, or did the Chinese get anything in return? Investigative journalist John Solomon joins to break down what was going on here ...

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Here are 5 RIDICULOUS moments from the Davos summit

Dimitrios Kambouris / Staff, FABRICE COFFRINI / Contributor, JOSEPH EID / Contributor | Getty Images

Glenn has been warning about the dangers of the World Economic Forum and The Great Reset, which is the WEF's goal to utilize the crises like the COVID pandemic to create a leftist Utopia. Now, these goals continue to take shape at the World Economic Forum summit in Davos. Here are five ridiculous moments from this year's summit that shed light on their ultimate vision Glenn has been warning about.

1. Ex-CNN host Brian Stelter hosts the WEF panel on "disinformation," calling for the criminalization of "hate speech" in the U.S.

The former host of Reliable Sources was fired from CNN in 2022 for raking in the network's worst ratings since 2019. CNN's CEO at the time, Chris Licht, accused Stelter of "drawing ire from conservatives" for misrepresenting the facts and propagating false narratives to demonize conservatives. Licht fired Stelter because he was a liability to CNN's attempt to "re-brand" itself as a "reliable" news source.

You would think the World Economic Forum could have found a more credible host for its "disinformation," than Brian Stelter, and it comes with little surprise Stelter's panel called for the continued censorship of conservatives.

Stelter asked his panel, "How does this discussion of disinformation relate to everything else happening today in Davos?"

Vice-President of the European Commission Vera Jourová answered "illegal hate speech" from right-wing extremists, and then called for the criminalization of hate speech in the U.S., asserting, "I think that we have a strong reason why we have this in the criminal law" within the EU.

As former Trump advisor Stephen Miller pointed out, Stelter's refusal to further challenge Jourová's call for censorship is indicative of his failed career as a journalist.

2. Al Gore warns of "rain bombs," "boiling oceans," and "xenophobia" as a result of climate change.

Gore's speech "speaks" for itself...

After asserting that we're creating an "open sewer" in the troposphere, Gore exclaimed:

That’s what’s boiling the oceans, creating these atmospheric rivers, and the rain bombs, and sucking the moisture out of the land, and creating the droughts, and melting the ice and raising the sea level, and causing these waves of climate refugees!
Watch the latest video at <a href="https://www.foxnews.com">foxnews.com</a>

Speaking of refugees, Gore blamed the mass migrations of people on... you guessed it... climate change! Of course this leads to "xenophobia" and "fascism," so if we hate "xenophobia" and "fascism," we need to stop climate change IMMEDIATELY. Plus the rain bombs...

Does this sound reminiscent of the "Man-Bear-Pig?"

Courtesy of South Park

3. Siemens AG Chairman Jim Hagemann urges for 1 million people to NOT eat meat—predicting a "meatless future."

It wouldn't be a World Economic Forum summit if bugs didn't take center stage. Siemens AG Chairman Jim Hagemann said he was inspired by his 24-year-old daughter to stop eating meat to fight climate change and urged one million people to stop eating meat to balance out jet emissions—like the jets his fellow attendees used to travel to the conference?

Here's what he said:

If a billion people stop eating meat, I tell you, it has a big impact. Not only does it have a big impact on the current food system, but it will also inspire innovation of food systems."
Watch the latest video at <a href="https://www.foxnews.com">foxnews.com</a>

Of course, finding "alternative sources of protein" means... you guessed it... BUGS. The EU is already cutting down on cattle farms and promoting the building of insect farms to initiate this "protein transition."

4. John Kerry calls Davos attendees a "select group" with an "almost extraterrestrial" plan to save the planet.

Kerry's opening speech at Davos shows the type of elitism the attendees believe about themselves. They are the "special ones" who can gather at a Swiss resort town to discuss how to "save the planet" and the "little people" who are too ignorant to have a say in the matter. His words speak for themselves:

When you start to think about it, it's pretty extraordinary that we — select group of human beings because of whatever touched us at some point in our lives — are able to sit in a room and come together and actually talk about saving the planet [...] I mean, it's so almost extraterrestrial to think about saving the planet [...] f you say that to most people, most people think you're just a crazy, tree-hugging, lefty liberal, you know, do-gooder, or whatever, and there's no relationship. But really, that's where we are.
Watch the latest video at <a href="https://www.foxnews.com">foxnews.com</a>

Well, not everyone was amused...

Businessman and conservative Tim Acheson called Kerry’s words, "Liberal delusions of grandeur." Jordan Peterson also tweeted, "Who are you going to sacrifice to save the planet, @JohnKerry -- and do you think and how will you ensure that they have any say in the matter?"

5. Davos attendees traveled on more than 1,000 private jets to the conference.

Greenspace, an environmentalist research group, estimates the total emissions used by Davos attendees on their private jets while traveling to the conference is equivalent to "about 350,000 average cars."

Greenspace also found that 53 percent of all private jet trips were short-haul flights of less than 470 nautical miles that "could have easily been train trips." This comes amid the EU's push to ban short-distance flights and opt for train travel instead, which many continue to point out.

Closing thoughts

What once sounded like conspiracy theories are now taking shape amongst the global elites at Davos. As Glenn continues to shed light on the dangers of the World Economic Forum, here's how YOU can fight back against their goals that threaten our freedoms and democracy.

In honor of the World Economic Forum summit in Davos, we would like to resurrect this gem from Glenn's Instagram archive. If "the Great Reset" doesn't work out, Schwab should consider reaching out to the Bond franchise for a Plan-B career.

Be sure to follow Glenn on Instagram for more!

This is part of our ongoing series on "The Great Reset." To read similar content, click here.