Florida Comrades

GLENN BECK PROGRAM


BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

GLENN: Let me go first to Christian Waugh. He is the President of the Law School of Republicans of the University of Florida. And Christian, you had some sort of a program against radical Islam. Can you tell me what it was and what your intent was?

WAUGH: Yes, that's right. We showed a movie called obsession, radical Islam, war against the West and the point of showing the movie was that bringing the issue back to the forefront of discussion at the University of Florida. You know, we felt there's been a lot of talk about healthcare lately, the "Don't ask don't tell" on the CNN debates. So we wanted to get people focused on this issue and didn't want them to forget about it.



 


Statement from the University of Florida

No matter their original intent, the advertisements for the movie "Obsession" reinforced negative stereotypes and made many of UF's Muslim students feel unsafe. The e-mail to students was intended to promote civility, tolerance and diversity at a time when acts of hatred on college campuses such as the noose at Columbia University are making national headlines.

Free speech is of paramount importance at the University of Florida. Students must have the opportunity to express themselves without fear and to debate difficult issues with their colleagues. It is an essential part of their education and their ability to develop critical thinking skills.

However, students must also learn that debate is not healthy when it intimidates, frightens, or makes students feel that they are not safe on campus.

GLENN: Yeah, it's an amazing video. It's actually what inspired my special that I ran over a year ago which was the highest rated program in the network's history, or the second highest rated program in the network's history and it's incredibly fair. It is balanced and it shows good things. It shows the people in Islam that are trying to take it back, but it's hair-raising stuff. You put out flyers that said what?

WAUGH: The flier said in big bold letters, radical Islam wants you dead, and it was that provocative statement which has set off this firestorm. The administration came out, once some people approached the administration and said that they were offended, the administration put out a campuswide e-mail to all 50,000 students and $51 that we owe the entire campus an apology.

GLENN: Are you going to apologize?

WAUGH: We made it very clear in a response that we will not apologize for the flyers.

GLENN: What was your response? Do you happen to have that there?

WAUGH: I don't have it in front of me, but I can summarize what I --

GLENN: Yeah, go ahead.

WAUGH: What we wrote was basically we will not apologize for telling the truth. We have a whole list of reasons why radical Islam does want us dead and I would challenge anyone to find a radical Islamist who wants us alive.

GLENN: All right. We called yesterday. I wanted somebody from the University of Florida to explain their statement. What a surprise they wouldn't come on the program with us. None of these liberal pinheads ever actually want to defend themselves. They never want to actually come on and say, okay, here it is, and I'm a reasonable guy, I'll listen to the other side. I'm not going to listen to propaganda.

WAUGH: Right.

GLENN: Which is exactly what most of these universities are involved in. But I'm a reasonable guy. You know, you say that -- if I find out, Christian, you guys were doing stuff that was blatantly racist or anti-Muslim then, you know, I've got a problem with you and I'll rip you to shreds as well but until I hear anything more than radical Islam wants you dead, you're right on the money. So here's what the University of Florida, they sent us a statement, quote, in lieu of an on-air interview which is exactly what I was looking for, a statement. Says that no matter their original intent -- talking about you -- the advertisements for the movie Obsession reinforced negative stereotypes.

What kind of negative stereotypes in your advertisements were there?

WAUGH: You know, the only thing on the flier that referred to Islam is that statement, radical Islam wants you dead. I'm not sure what stereotypes they mean. I don't know if they even really --

GLENN: Hang on just a second. Negative stereotypes.

WAUGH: Yeah, yeah, I don't --

GLENN: I think it's -- can we just take a vote? I think we're pretty reasonable to say that radical Islam wants us dead. If we're stereotyping, well, then yes, call me a typist and I can type 100 words a minute. It's crazy, if that's the kind of stereotyping that I do. And it is negative that they want us dead. They also said they made many -- this negative stereotype made many of the UF's Muslim students feel unsafe.

WAUGH: That's what the administration said, yeah.

GLENN: Were you guys -- because it goes on: The e-mail to students was intended to promote civility, tolerance at a time when acts of hatred on college campuses such as the noose at Columbia University are making headlines. Did you guys put nooses up or anything like that?

WAUGH: No, no, the only thing we did was put up a flier.

GLENN: No, no, the nooses, they are bringing up the nooses. Did you set an effigy of Mohammed on fire or did you threaten anybody?

WAUGH: No, no, and I think it's very curious that they say that given the problems recently at the University of Florida with all kinds of political speech. I don't know if you saw what happened with Attorney General Gonzales when he was here. You know, people jumped up onto the stage and were assaulting him. And also the (inaudible) incident, of course.

GLENN: No, I don't think these universities are out of control at all. So Christopher, I just want to make sure this is clear. You guys didn't threaten anybody?

WAUGH: No.

GLENN: You guys just said that radical Islam wants you dead, yet the Muslim students complained saying that acts of hatred on college campuses such as the noose at Columbia University are making national headlines and the Muslim students now feel unsafe. Oh, oh, my gosh. You know what, Chris? We've completely misunderstood this. Oh, my gosh. I just understood this statement. The Muslim students feel unsafe because they're not radical Muslims and they're thinking that radical Muslims want them dead and so they're afraid of the radical Muslims. Is that a possibility that that's what they --

WAUGH: Well, given the actions taken by Al-Qaeda in Iraq, I guess that could be a possibility.

GLENN: Maybe that's what it is. My gosh, oh, my gosh, I feel so bad for the Muslims on campus now because they are unsafe. They truly are unsafe. They are just as unsafe as anybody else who speaks out against radical Islam and for them to go and attend this movie. How many of the Muslims did you have there attend the Obsession thing?

WAUGH: We had several, and they engaged in a dialogue with us, I mean a decent dialogue and talked about the issues. Those who complained did not attend.

GLENN: Right. Okay. So there were a lot of good Muslims that attended this and had a good dialogue. So maybe it's those Muslim students that are feeling unsafe because they are speaking out against radical Islam.

WAUGH: Yeah. You know, makes sense to me.

GLENN: Yeah, yeah. Well, that's the only thing that could possibly make sense, unless it was just propaganda, a liberal agenda and political correctness happening at the university, and we know that would never happen. They continue in their statement to say free speech is of paramount importance at the University of Florida. I had a hard time reading that one with a straight face. "Students must have the opportunity to express themselves without fear and to debate difficult issues with their colleagues. It is an essential part of their education and the ability to develop critical thinking skills." Well, that explains why they were jumping up on stage with Alberto Gonzales. "However, students must also not debate when it intimidates." Wait a minute. This could be a reference. Maybe they got this in the wrong memo. Maybe this was to the students that were jumping up on stage. "Students must learn debates are not healthy when it intimidates, frightens or makes students feel that they are not safe on campus." Wow. Chris...

WAUGH: I don't think they issued a statement about the Alberto Gonzales thing, either. I mean, double standards are great as long as they are the ones taking advantage of them.

GLENN: No, hang on just a second. Some would say, and I've said relentlessly on this program that no society ever becomes more tolerant. It just changes targets, but that's irrelevant. I think the reason why they didn't issue a statement on the Alberto Gonzales is because they were busy writing this one and maybe this one to us was just, you know, was just trying to, without saying, was just trying to cover that Alberto Gonzales thing.

WAUGH: It is a pretty long letter.

GLENN: Yeah, it's almost two paragraphs.

WAUGH: Oh, you got the short version.

GLENN: Yeah.

WAUGH: The whole campus got an eight paragraph, you know, song about how we divided the campus unnecessarily and how we need to be accurate information, that we use accurate information.

GLENN: Really? I've got to tell ya that stuff got through the censors of CNN and if it can pass the censors of CNN, good God almighty, it can pass anybody's censors. That's really weird that that's inaccurate information that you were presenting in that but, hey, I'm sure you don't feel intimidated, you know, by the university. I'm sure you feel perfectly comfortable and welcome to offer another side.

WAUGH: That's the problem with this. It really is chilling free speech. It makes it far less likely for students to speak out against this thing because of the administration's response.

GLENN: You should write them a return memo about the inaccurate information on global warming that I'm sure is being jammed down your throat.

WAUGH: I think what we need to fight is the global cooling thing. If this planet cools 3 degrees, we lose all the wildlife here in Florida.

GLENN: All right, my friend, thank you very much, Chris.

WAUGH: Thank you.

GLENN: That was the president of the law school Republicans, the University of Florida. Yesterday after the stage show here in Toledo, Ohio, a woman walked right up to me and she said, I want to show you what my son is being taught in school and it is a two-page assignment. The first, these are all, remember, right in cursive and complete sentences. These are the instructions from the teacher. First question, who is Mohammed? Second question, what was Mohammed's occupation before he had a vision. Number three, what decision did Mohammed make after the Angel Gabriel appeared before him. Number four is what kind of city was Mecca before Mohammed began to preach. Number five, what did the leaders of Mecca fear that beliefs would harm. Number 6 is why do you think Mohammed destroyed the statues of gods and goddesses in the Kaaba. Number seven, what are the five pillars of Islam. What is one way in which Mohammed's teachings and practices of Muslims sometimes differ. Nine, what are the two holy cities of Islam. Ten, what is the pilgrimage. Eleven, give two ways that Christianity and Islam are similar. And eleven, what continent is Mecca on.

So I think that's fabulous and, you know, if this holy season of the year for Christians, I'm just wondering if the Toledo school districts are also having a twelve-page essay on Jesus Christ. I'll wait for that one to arrive in the mail.

END TRANSCRIPT

Critical Race Theory: A special brand of evil

wal_172619/Pixabay

Part of what makes it hard for us to challenge the left is that their beliefs are complicated. We don't mean complicated in a positive way. They aren't complicated the way love is complicated. They're complicated because there's no good explanation for them, no basis in reality.

The left cannot pull their heads out of the clouds. They are stuck on romantic ideas, abstract ideas, universal ideas. They talk in theories. They see the world through ideologies. They cannot divorce themselves from their own academic fixations. And — contrary to what they believe and how they act — it's not because leftists are smarter than the rest of us. And studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country. Marx was no different. The Communist Manifesto talks about how the rise of cities "rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life."

Studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country.

Instead of admitting that they're pathological hypocrites, they tell us that we're dumb and tell us to educate ourselves. Okay, so we educate ourselves; we return with a coherent argument. Then they say, "Well, you can't actually understand what you just said unless you understand the work of this other obscure Marxist writer. So educate yourselves more."

It's basically the "No True Scotsman" fallacy, the idea that when you point out a flaw in someone's argument, they say, "Well, that's a bad example."

After a while, it becomes obvious that there is no final destination for their bread-crumb trail. Everything they say is based on something that somebody else said, which is based on something somebody else said.

Take critical race theory. We're sure you've noticed by now that it is not evidence-based — at all. It is not, as academics say, a quantitative method. It doesn't use objective facts and data to arrive at conclusions. Probably because most of those conclusions don't have any basis in reality.

Critical race theory is based on feelings. These feelings are based on theories that are also based on feelings.

We wanted to trace the history of critical race theory back to the point where its special brand of evil began. What allowed it to become the toxic, racist monster that it is today?

Later, we'll tell you about some of the snobs who created critical theory, which laid the groundwork for CRT. But if you follow the bread-crumb trail from their ideas, you wind up with Marxism.

For years, the staff has devoted a lot of time to researching Marxism. We have read a lot of Marx and Marxist writing. It's part of our promise to you to be as informed as possible, so that you know where to go for answers; so that you know what to say when your back is up against the wall. What happens when we take the bread-crumb trail back farther, past Marxism? What is it based on?

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism.

It's actually based on the work of one of the most important philosophers in human history, a 19th-century German philosopher named Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism. And, as you'll see in just a bit, if we look at Hegel's actual ideas, it's obvious that Marx completely misrepresented them in order to confirm his own fantasies.

So, in a way, that's where the bread-crumb trail ends: With Marx's misrepresentation of an incredibly important, incredibly useful philosophy, a philosophy that's actually pretty conservative.

We've heard a lot about critical race theory lately, and for good reason: It's a racist ideology designed to corrupt our children and undermine our American values. But most of what we see are the results of a process that has been underway for decades. And that's not something the mainstream media, the Democrat Party, and even teachers unions want you to know. They're doing everything in their power to try and convince you that it's no big deal. They want to sweep everything under the rug and keep you in the dark. To fight it, we need to understand what fuels it.

On his Wednesday night special this week, Glenn Beck exposes the deep-seated Marxist origins of CRT and debunks the claims that it's just a harmless term for a school of legal scholarship. Newsweek opinion editor Josh Hammer joins to argue why we must ban critical race theory from our schools if we want to save a very divided nation.

Watch the full "Glenn TV" episode below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

On the radio program Monday, Glenn Beck blasted the Democrats — and anyone else on the left — who have been so eager to open our southern U.S. border for the past several months, but also willing to turn a blind eye to the Cuban people in need of help today.

"While we are welcoming people from any country, all over the world, without any kind of information, and setting them into our country, putting them on American planes paid for by American taxpayers," Glenn began. "And our Coast Guard Cutters are turning these [Cuban] people away. Shame on you! Shame on you!"

Glenn said that he's "sick and tired" of hearing about "brave" leftist activists like Colin Kaepernick, who protest the America flag while wearing Che Guevara and Fidel Castro t-shirts. Meanwhile, the Cuban people are risking their lives by taking to the sea to escape their oppressive regime and come to America.

"Anybody who glorifies Che doesn't know their ass from their elbow. You can't call them a human rights activist. You're protesting the American flag, because you so deeply believe in the right to be free? And yet, you wear a Che T-shirt?" Glenn said.

Glenn went on to argue that, even though the left has "bastardized" the meaning of our country, he still believes America is the best nation on Earth. In fact, he'd give up his citizenship "in a heartbeat" if another country could prove to be better, more noble, and more free. But no other nation exists like ours, he said, which is why it's so imperative we fight for freedom here, in Cuba, and around the world.

Watch the video clip below to hear Glenn explain:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

There's a new "reality" spreading, and the mere act of questioning it has become incredibly dangerous, Wall Street Journal investigative journalist Abigail Shrier told Glenn on the most recent episode of "The Glenn Beck Podcast."

Shrier's book, "Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters," exposes the radical gender activism that — like critical race theory — has overtaken our children's schools and culture. But even worse, she warned, it could end your parental rights for good.

Shrier made it clear she is by no means "anti-trans," but simply speaking up against the extremes of this new "reality" has made her enemy No. 1 to many activists. Her book has been bashed so hard by the Left that Target has stopped selling it twice, Amazon once banned ads for it, and the American Booksellers Association even called sending it to others "a serious, violent incident."

In the clip below, Shrier explained why she believes "there may be no hope for the public school system."

"You have teachers behaving like activists across the country who have no interest in actually teaching. They believe their job is to remake your child," she asserted. "We're seeing so much evidence of that, I think it's fair to say that it may be too deeply rooted in the ideology being taught in public school. I'm not sure that the public school system is redeemable at this point."

Watch the video clip below for more or find the full podcast with Abigail Shrier here:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.