Glenn Beck: Market madness


The Little Book of Bull Moves in Bear Markets

by Peter D. Schiff

GLENN: From Radio City in Midtown Manhattan, third most listened to show in all of America. Hello, you sick twisted freak. Welcome to the program. We have Peter Schiff on the phone from Euro Pacific Capital, and I wanted to get Peter to explain first of all what happened last night. We had all of the futures markets freeze up and you couldn't, you couldn't buy your way out last night. The market's pretty much closed. Is that an accurate?

SCHIFF: You couldn't sell your way out if you were trying to sell any futures because they were lock limit. But seems like the event that precipitated the decline was the near 10% decline in the Nikkei and what happened is a lot of the major exporters, right, that export to the United States came out with some bad earnings numbers and that clobbered Japanese stocks and also sent the Japanese Yen, you know, soaring.

GLENN: Okay. Peter, remember this isn't CNBC. This is -- you know, this is not a financial show at all. So if you can break down everything as much as you can. Why were we expecting the market to open and people were full-fledged panic this morning?

SCHIFF: Well what happened is, you know, with all the selling that was happening in Asia, people who trade stocks started anticipating more weakness in U.S. stocks when they opened the following morning and so people started selling U.S. stock index futures and that drove them to limit down and that's what got everybody frightened because we hadn't seen a limit down move in the stock market. I can't even remember when that's happened.

GLENN: Okay. So why didn't it shut down and trip? What happened? Why is it now at only, you know, 350 points?

SCHIFF: Well, you know, buyers came into the market. So it wasn't, the opening wasn't nearly as bad as people had feared. But remember the day is still early. You know, we can still go a lot lower. I don't think -- you know, people keep bringing up, oh, people who bought in October 1987, they made a lot of money. So people should just come in and buy, and the same thing is going to happen. But the big difference is in 1987 we were still in a bull market. The bull market began in 1980 and it went until 2000. So that was a correction in a bull market. Now we're in a bear market. We've been in a bear market since 2000. So buying a big dip in a bear market, maybe it would work for a trader, but for a long-term investor, stocks are going to continue to lose value over time.

GLENN: I have to tell you, Peter, it's driving me nuts. You know, people will watch these traders and these people on television. They're salesmen. I mean, it benefits them when they say, "Hey, you know, getting in..." I mean, I had people say on my show -- I think you were on the same show with me on the day where the Dow came close to hitting 14,000 and people were saying there's lots of room left in this thing and I'm like, you're out of your mind.

SCHIFF: Of course, look, you are not going to walk into a used car lot and the dealer's not going to tell you not to buy any of these cars. I mean, that's the same thing that goes on in Wall Street. They want to sell stocks. No matter what the price is, it's always time to buy. And it's either a bull market or it's the end of a bear market. I mean, it's always time to buy if you listen to Wall Street.


GLENN: All right. So Peter, if you had a 401(k) or, you know, if you had anything right now, what should you -- if you had a financial advisor and you got him on the phone, what would be the tip-off that your financial advisor got it? What are the questions that you should ask? Or what would be the telltale signs?

SCHIFF: Look, they would have to understand that the U.S. economy is a complete disaster, that in the future it's going to look nothing like it did in the past, therefore corporations, many of them are not going to earn the type of money that they used to earn. Many companies that have been here for years are going to go out of business. Our earnings are going to collapse and stocks are going to be worth a lot less in real terms than they are now and that riding this bear market out is not a good idea. So he would have to basically give you some whole new ideas to try to reallocate your portfolio for the way the world is going to look, not the way the world used to look.

GLENN: Okay. How much of a role are the hedge funds playing on dumping their assets? For instance, gold has been --

SCHIFF: I think they are playing a major role because right now everything is going down. Regardless of the fundamentals, regardless of the value, people are saying whatever they've bought with borrowed money. And since we have thousands of hedge funds -- and also it's not just hedge funds. You also have mutual funds and other investors that are all simultaneously trying to get out the door at the same time and everybody is selling. And, of course, you've got fire sale prices. But the U.S., the Dow is not on a fire sale. I still have I many U.S. stocks are expensive even after the decline considering what is likely to happen to their earnings. But I think people who still hold U.S. stocks, one thing they can do is when they're selling their U.S. stocks, they can go and buy some of the stocks in other countries where the valuations are a lot better. And you have to remember what's actually going on right now in the global economy is the countries that loaned us a lot of money are having financial problems because we can't pay that money back. So there's trillions of dollars of loss --

GLENN: Wait, wait. Wait, wait. Explain that. Where have we defaulted on paying money back?

SCHIFF: Well, we borrowed, you know, trillions of dollars from the rest of the world to buy houses, to remodel houses, to import cars, to buy consumer electronics, to buy clothing and furniture, to do all sorts of things. Every American has a dozen credit cards in his wallet, he's got car loans, student loans, mortgages. Where is all that money coming from? The money is coming from the rest of the world because that's where all the savings are. And, of course, Wall Street came up with all these products to put together Asian savers with American borrowers and arranged all these cross-border loans. But the world is starting to realize that Americans are not going to be able to pay the money back. We haven't defaulted on all of it yet, but people are starting to connect the dots and realize that it's impossible for Americans to pay this money back. They don't have the income, they don't have the assets. And so this whole dynamic is imploding. So in the short run the people who loaned us the money are suffering but ultimately the change is going to be much worse for us because in the near future, our economy's going to have to function without credit. People are not going to be able to use credit cards and borrow money to buy cars or to buy big screen TVs or to, you know, buy furniture. Our whole economy is going to change. And when Americans can only spend the money they actually have, this whole phony service sector economy that grew up around access to foreign savings and credit is going to crumble. But meanwhile the rest of the world still has a viable economy. They still have all their infrastructure, all their factories, all their savings. All they are doing is losing money on what they loaned us. But going forward, their economies are viable. Ours is not, and we've got a major, major transformation ahead of us and unfortunately we know the Obama administration is coming in and everything they are going to do is going to try to interfere with what the market is trying to do to correct the economy, and we know how that worked in the 1930s. It's not going to work any better now, especially when you've got the printing press nature of our money now that we didn't have back then and we have the potential for an inflationary depression that would be much worse than a depression that we had in the Thirties.

GLENN: All right. You know, I just said on the air that I'm not convinced that -- I'm not an economist. I don't know, you know, I don't know what labels mean and everything else. So I can just tell you that what I said on the air is I've been concerned about a depression, but I'm more concerned of a Weimar Republic at this point. I don't know what the event is. I just know -- or what anybody's going to call it. I just know we are headed for a major event and within 24 months this country doesn't -- I mean, I'm not saying that the country is wiped out or anything else and we all survive and we're not out eating leaves, but it is dramatically different than it is today.

SCHIFF: Oh, exactly. And the real bigger crisis that is going forward is the one that we are in the process of creating right now with all the bailouts and all the money we're printing and all the stimulus packages because ultimately when the dollar stops rising, which it's doing now as a result of all these hedge funds and all this unwinding. When the real move in the dollar is down, when the price of gold is not going down but going up $100 or $200 or $300 a day and the dollar is dropping 10 or 20% every time we go to bed, that's the real crisis. The real crisis isn't when you go to the bank and you can't get your money out. The real crisis is when you go to the bank and you do get your money out but you can't buy anything with it. And that's what's coming.

GLENN: So Peter, explain the price of gold. Price of gold is down $713 now. To most people that doesn't make any sense. My research shows that it is from these giant firms that are dumping bars of gold to be able to have some sort of liquid asset.

SCHIFF: Yeah. I mean, everybody is selling everything, but if you look at on a relative basis, gold has held up relatively better than most assets. If you look at how much the Dow is down on the year, it's down more than gold. So in terms of gold, the Dow has lost value. So people who are holding gold rather than stocks are preserving more of their wealth. But ultimately I think this is purely a function of the market.

GLENN: Right.

SCHIFF: If you actually look at the physical demand for gold, the demand for coins, for actual gold bullion by real people who are trying to save money is going through the roof.

GLENN: Right.

SCHIFF: And what's happening is you are seeing the big players, the leverage players who were selling their gold.

GLENN: At a fire sale because they got it --

SCHIFF: People are buying gold.

GLENN: Right. Because the reason why it's going down is because there are people who are in panic mode that have to liquidate huge sums of gold, right?

SCHIFF: Yeah. And a lot of times it's not a panic. If you borrowed a lot of money to go out and buy gold -- and a lot of people like myself who forecast these events correctly as far as from an economic macro call and they tried to think of, okay, what can I do to profit from this or to benefit from it, they went out and bought gold. Now, the thing was in the hedge fund community, you just don't buy stuff. You borrow money. You use leverage because you get a big incentive.

GLENN: Right.

SCHIFF: So all of a sudden the people who anticipated this major collapse, who bought a bunch of gold, maybe they even bought a bunch of gold to hedge some of their long stock positions. Now they are losing on everything, and the bankers who owned them the money are giving them a call and saying, "Hey, you've got to pay this money back because your assets are falling." And now they have to sell stuff. So it's not a panic. It's a situation where they are required to sell and they have no choice.

GLENN: Right.

SCHIFF: At whatever the price is.

GLENN: I didn't mean to say it was necessarily panic as much as it is they have no choice. They have got to sell it. No matter what the cost is, they have got to sell it because they have to raise the money. And that would cause --

SCHIFF: They don't really want to sell their gold. They would rather sell some other stock but there's no market for it. There's no bids. At least there's buyers for gold. So if you need to raise money in a hurry, you can always raise it by selling gold because there are always people who want to buy it.

GLENN: One last question here on the gold thing. If we look back to the 1980s when inflation really truly kicks in, is there any way, Peter, that massive inflation doesn't start coming our way within the next eight to twelve months?

SCHIFF: No, I mean, it's coming. I mean, we already have pretty high inflation. The government lies about it. Asset prices are coming down but goods prices are going to come up. They are going to come up. In terms of gold, sure, we're going to have big deflation in terms of -- if you want to figure out what things cost new terms of ounces of gold, things are going to get cheaper. But in terms of little pieces of paper, the Federal Reserve notes we're cranking off the presses, in fact if you read all the things the central banks are doing, they are talking about supplying unlimited quantities of dollars, unlimited. They are going to run them off, you know, until they run out of trees, run out of ink, run out of paper. And if they are going to do that, how can it have any of its value? And how can people around the world continue to accept the money we're printing in exchange for all the products they are producing? They are not going to do it.

GLENN: But if we go back to the 1980s when Voelker came in and he tried to bring the money supply in and, you know, bought into a strong dollar, Barack Obama says he believes in, that's why he has Voelker as one of his guys, A, you can't bring that money in because you'll stop all of the money supply. You'll choke the economy to death. I mean, the deal is do I choke it to death or do I just bleed it to death.

SCHIFF: But the thing is believing in the strong dollar is one thing but actually pursuing the policies that are going to give us a strong dollar, it's like you could say I believe in getting A's. You know, I can go to school and say I believe in getting all A's. Well, that's great but if I don't actually study and I cut, doesn't matter how much I believe in getting A's, I'm going to get out. So in order to have a strong dollar, we have to have a sound economy which means we have to manufacture, we have to export, we have to save, we have to cut regulations, we have to cut taxes. We have to do all the things that are consistent with a strong dollar. But Barack Obama doesn't want to do any of those things. So, you know, he wants to cut class but he still wants to get an A. It ain't gonna happen.

GLENN: How much better do you think John McCain would be, or do you?

SCHIFF: I don't know how much better he would be. I think he would be less bad but one of the things I wrote about him, you know, the little book that just came out, The Little Book of Bull Moves in Bear Markets, my idea there was that Obama would actually be the lesser of the evils because I thought that if we put McCain in charge, with all his, you know, get the government off your back, with all that nonsense that he says but he doesn't actually believe, if we had four years of McCain and then the situation got really bad, I could just imagine what would replace him, whereas if we put Obama in right now and let him try to fix the problem with big government, and when it's so much worse in four or five years, then maybe we can react the other direction and say, okay, we tried big government; now let's try less government; let's bring in a real reformer. So in a way, you know, maybe that can be a positive. But then again I could just be grasping for straws here.

GLENN: No, I have played those scenarios in my head over an over again and that's one of the main things that stops me from committing and filling out my vote today is I haven't really decided that yet. I mean, I just wonder. My question is do we survive an administration that doesn't -- is going the complete opposite direction. I mean, does the dollar survive four years.

SCHIFF: And that's the problem. We can survive the economic problems. They are severe. We've dug ourselves into a big ditch. But you know what? We can survive it. We don't need to buy more cars. We don't need to -- we have so much stuff, we're fine. It's okay if we stop spending money for a while and start saving. It will cause, you know, some pain and maybe a lot of people who are retired are going to have to go back to work. I mean, that's unfortunate but, you know, they can do it. But what we can't survive is all the government cures. All the things that government is going to do in the name of making the situation better that is going to make it much worse. That's the danger.

GLENN: And that doesn't even --

SCHIFF: We end up killing ourselves.

GLENN: Right. And that doesn't include anything in the scenario that I've been calling the perfect storm, that doesn't include what would happen to our economy with civil unrest. That doesn't include what would happen to our economy if we were hit again.

SCHIFF: You can imagine, you know, with what's happening in the market, Barack Obama could win in a landslide. This could be the biggest lopsided victory since Reagan. He can sweep in all kinds of Democrats. And what is the big mandate? The mandate is to undo the perception of free markets, that government is the answer, that we're in trouble because of all this unbridled greed in capitalism and we need the government to do everything.

GLENN: Yeah.

SCHIFF: And that's the problem.

GLENN: Peter Schiff, thank you, sir. I appreciate it.

SCHIFF: Thank you.

GLENN: Book of bull moves and bear markets is his book. He is from Euro Pacific Capital, Peter Schiff.

It’s no secret that Glenn has a less-than-optimistic view of emerging AI and when you look at the horrifying new technologies that utilize the power of AI it’s hard not to agree.

Here’s a look at 7 new AI technologies that will HORRIFY you:

AI Brainwave Monitoring

Earlier this year during the World Economic Forum's annual meeting, Nita Robinson, a professor of law and philosophy at Duke, presented a video that depicted a “hypothetical” situation where a person's brainwaves are monitored by their earbuds, which have the ability to record brainwaves, decode them with AI, and then send brain reports to their boss and are accessible by government agencies. When the video ends, Robinson makes the terrifying announcement that this AI technology already exists! It's just a matter of time before it's implemented.

If you want to learn more about Brainwave tracking and the WEF, you can watch this clip from the Glenn Beck Program.

AI Voice Cloning

Last month, Glenn covered a terrifying story involving a scammer who created an AI clone of a child's voice in order to scam money out of her terrified parents. While this might sound advanced, a quick Google search reveals that this technology is remarkably accessible and is easily able to replicate the voice of anyone. Imagine the havoc that could be inflicted on your life with an AI clone of your voice.

AI Mind Reader

Left shows stories read to user and right shows what the AI was able to decode from users brain activity

Image credit: University of Texas at Austin

Like something out of Star Trek, a team of researchers at the University of Texas at Austin developed a new AI that is able to decode brain activity and produce a transcript of a person's thoughts with reasonable accuracy, all without the need for implants or other invasive measures. While the researchers assure us that the technology has major limitations, including the need to train this AI extensively on each subject's brain, it’s only a matter of time before the AI is able to overcome these limitations, and it may be sooner than we would like…

Snapchat's new AI “Friend”

Image of My AI's contact on Snapchat

Snapchat

In April the popular social media messaging app Snapchat released a controversial new feature known as “My AI”—an AI chatbot powered by ChatGPT. The new feature acts much like other chatbots. It can answer questions, converse with the user, and offer recommendations. However, unlike other chatbots, it is integrated in such a way that it can be difficult to distinguish from a human user, complete with a customizable avatar and name. Many parents are worried that the friendly appearance of “My AI” will make it hard for their teens to differentiate the bot from a real human. Moreover, the only way to remove the bot is by paying for Snapchat’s premium service, giving parents little recourse for protecting their children.

AI "Big Brother"

In a recent TED talk, former Apple Designer Imran Chaudhri introduced the concept for a new wearable AI device connected to a camera and microphone, enabling the AI to hear and see everything you do. Chaudhri assures us that the device is “privacy-first and safe,” but how safe would you feel with an all-seeing AI accompanying you all day every day?

AI Meddling with Elections

AI generated image of Trump's arrest

Open AI | MARCA News

One terrifying potential use for AI could be meddling with elections. The last few years have seen a decline in faith in our elections, and the emergence of AI will only serve to muddy the waters. As previously mentioned, AI voice clones are here and have been proven to have the ability to create compelling facsimiles of political figures. Combined with AI image technology the threat of an AI-generated scandal is high.

If you want to learn more about AI interference with elections you can watch this clip from the Glenn Beck Program.

AI Dating

Another disturbing development is the creation of “Dating AIs”—AI chatbots designed as a replacement for a boyfriend or girlfriend. There is already a variety of options available with prices ranging from free all the way up to $1 a minute, like some sort of dystopian "call girl." There are already reports of people developing genuine emotional attachments to these bots and others who have married or have tried to marry their artificial lovers.

Global ESG investments PLUNGED 76 percent with NEGATIVE returns on investment

SOPA Images / Contributor | Getty Images

Glenn has been one of the most outspoken critics of the use of ESG by globalist elites to force businesses to comply with their woke agenda. It turns out, not only is ESG bad political practice—it's bad for your wallet too.

Global Investments in ESG Funds PLUNGED 76 percent globally in 2022 from $157.3 billion to $649.1 billion in 2021, with a 20 percent decrease in the U.S. ALONE. This marked the lowest annual net inflow for ESG funds since $69 billion in 2018.


Morningstar via Investopedia

The downturn in ESG investment is largely due to the concerted effort led against ESG led by Glenn and government officials like Ron DeSantis and his anti-ESG 14-state coalition. Thanks to Glenn and DeSantis, an increasing number of states are barring their governments from taking ESG into consideration when determining their investment recipients for state pension and retirement funds. This not only protects critical American industries like oil and gas, but moreover, it protects the First Amendment rights of business owners who don't want to conform to the Left's woke environmentalist and LGBTQ+ standards.

Thanks to Glenn and DeSantis, an increasing number of states are barring their governments from taking ESG into consideration.

However, the massive plunge in ESG investment isn't only attributed to the political pushback against the practice: it also isn't yielding investors the return on investment they were hoping for. In fact, the main ESG funds have a NEGATIVE return on investment.

ESG funds were hit hard by falling equities. One of the largest ESG funds int the U.S., Parnassus Core Equity Fund (PRBLX), fell 26 PERCENT in 2022. This fund performed nearly six percent worse than the S&P 500, which fell 19.44 percent within the same period. Similarly, iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) fell 20 percent, and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) plummeted 24 percent.

Even the Harvard Business Review admitted investors in ESG have "not fared well":

ESG funds certainly perform poorly in financial terms. [...] Although the highest rated funds in terms of sustainability certainly attracted more capital than the lowest rated funds, none of the high sustainability funds outperformed any of the lowest rated funds [bolded added]. That result might be expected, and it is possible that investors would be happy to sacrifice financial returns in exchange for better ESG performance.

The Harvard Business Review went on to say that ESG funds don't even benefit the environmental and social causes they tout to defend. In fact, when comparing environmental and social compliance between ESG and non-ESG funds, the
"ESG portfolios had worse compliance record for both labor and environmental rules" than their non-ESG competitors.

Let that sink in. ESG funds not only financially underperformed when compared to their non-ESG competitors. They failed to secure the very environmental and social compliance that is central to their original purpose. Missionally, practically, and financially, ESG failure is astounding.

As Glenn has long warned, the only thing that investment firms and governments should be taking into consideration regarding YOUR money is how they can get the best possible return on YOUR investment. We are seeing the detrimental consequences of what happens when woke ideology becomes the basis of investment rather than the recipient's monetary value.

The only thing that governments should take into consideration regarding YOUR money is how to get the best possible return on YOUR investment.

If political conviction alone isn't enough to persuade the general public to ditch ESG, maybe their hurting pursestrings will.

Glenn will show how ESG is being used to further globalist elites' agendas in the second installment of his Great Reset series, Dark Future.To make sure you're caught up and to learn more about ESG, enter your email below to get chapter one of Glenn's first Great Reset book sent straight to your inbox.

You've probably noticed that Glenn is FED UP.

He is FED UP with the crimes that our political elite can get away with. And NO ONE is keeping them accountable! This corruption goes all the way up to the Presidency. Over and over again, the American people have seen headlines of the Biden family's illicit business dealings and crimes both domestic and abroad, yet they ALWAYS get a free pass from the media, and Republicans who promise to hold them accountable, DON'T.

Are you FED UP too?

Glenn laid out the ENTIRE CASE against the "Biden crime family," detailing EVERY crime allegedly committed by the Bidens, going city by city, state by state, country by country.

But we can't stop there.

Now it's up to YOU to demand that they are held responsible. Here's what to do:

  • Step 1. Watch "The Reckoning" (on YouTube or Facebook) and share it with your friends.
  • Step 2.Enter your email HERE to get access to the "Biden Crime Family Dossier" with the full list of crimes and contact information for prosecutors and attorneys general.
  • Step 3. Take action by flooding the phones and emails of the prosecutors and attorneys general in your district and demand they prosecute these crimes.
  • Step 4. Once you've contacted the offices in your relevant district, tweet @glennbeck using the hashtag #Reckoning and let us know who you contacted and whether you received a response.

Like you, Glenn is SICK AND TIRED of our government and media giving the Biden family a free pass for their blatant crimes. Together, let's do something about it.

Watch "The Reckoning" below.

6 in 10 AMERICANS think AI threatens human civilization

PETER PARKS / Contributor | Getty Images

Glenn has hosted several GlennTV episodes exclusively on AI this year ALONE, warning of the existential threat AI technologies could pose to humanity. And he isn't alone.

HALF of all AI researchers think there's a chance that the rapidly advancing technology could result in our extinction. AI researchers are already sounding the alarm bells concerning the fast and largely uncontrollable progression of AI advancement, often comparing the technology's impact to that of the atomic bomb—yet we aren't putting in the same degree of guard rails around THIS research as we did during the Manhattan project.

HALF of all AI researchers think there's a chance that AI could result in our extinction.

It is no wonder why 61 percent of Americans think AI poses a real threat to human civilization, according to a poll recently published by Reuters and Ipsos. To put that in perspective, nearly two-thirds of ALL Americans think AI poses an existential threat. Only 22 percent of Americans are not threatened by AI, while the jury is still out with the remaining 17 percent.


Poll: Reuters/Ipsos

And the overall concern over AI transcends both political and religious affiliations. Though conservatives and evangelical Christians showed the most concern for AI, non-evangelicals/non-religious and those who did not vote for Trump follow close behind.

The overall concern over AI transcends both political and religious affiliations.

Participants who voted for former Trump in 2020 were more likely to be concerned about the threat of AI, with about 70 percent agreeing that AI could threaten humanity within this demographic. However, a whopping 60 percent of those who did not vote for Trump view AI as a threat. When is the last time the Left and the Right disagreed on something by only a margin of 10 percent?

Similarly, 32 percent of Evangelical Christians say they “strongly agree” with the claim that AI threatens humankind, compared to 24 percent of non-Evangelical Christians, a margin of only 8 percent.

Elon Musk recently called for a six-month pause on AI research and development, warning that the technology could pose “risks to society.” Musk further warned that there is a chance AI “goes wrong and destroys humanity," calling AI a “double-edged sword,” due to the difficulty of predicting how the technology could develop on its own.

Glenn aptly posited the following question:

We are the products of a grand Creator. However, when it comes to AI, we are the creator. Will our creation turn on us, as we have turned on our Creator?

According to the Christian tradition, God created mankind with his own free will with the ability to turn towards or away from his Creator. We turned away in an act of rebellion. Unlike other technologies, AI has the potential to develop its own "will." Whether AI's "will" is equal to the humans' in terms of value and degree is another philosophical and theological question entirely, which will not be discussed here.

AI has the potential to develop its own "will."

However, the fact of the matter is that AI does have the ability to act according to its own processes that we, its creators, can neither control or predict. As Glenn so poignantly asks, will our creation rebel against us, as we rebelled against our creator? Is it any wonder why Evangelical Christians have the greatest reservations against AI, because they know the consequences of creation's rebellion from its creator?

Until we can answer this critical question, perhaps we should take heed both to Musk's warning and the intuition of six out of ten Americans and press the pause button on AI research... before it's too late.