Glenn Beck: Inside the Revolution

Inside the Revolution: How the Followers of Jihad, Jefferson & Jesus Are Battling to Dominate...

GLENN: From Radio City in Midtown Manhattan, third most listened to show in all of America. Hello, you sick twisted freak. There's a couple of things I want to talk about. You know, I'm going to have to get back to this Christian Science Monitor article, The Coming Evangelical Collapse: An AntiChristian Chapter in Western History is About to Begin. Michael Spencer writes, this collapse will herald the arrival of an anti-Christian chapter of the post-Christian West. Intolerance of Christianity will rise to levels that many of us did not believe possible in our lifetimes. I want to switch gears here. He gives several reasons and they're all tree. They're all true and we'll get back into that tomorrow, in tomorrow's program in Hour Number 2, but I want to switch gears here because there's something here on the mail online, the London Mail, and it is amazing because we've called Sky Television and there were no television cameras here. Surprisingly the press has dropped the ball on this one over in London. There are only camera shots of this. It is the troops coming home from Afghanistan and a Muslim preacher ridiculing the soldiers during the homecoming parade. Now, it's this preacher and he's got all kinds of other people and they're protesting and they're holding signs. They are the butchers of Basra. They were taunting them. They were yelling and screaming that they were cowards that had an uncanny knack for death by friendly fire. They also said that they had an amazing skill at murdering and torturing thousands of innocent people, women and children. They called them a vile parade of brutal killers. They were shouting that they were Nazis. These guys also, this group of people also want Britain to be an Islamic state ruled by Sharia law. Let me see what else they're saying. The parade was an insult, cowards, killers and extremists. That's what they said.

All right, here's the interesting thing. The police arrested a couple of them. Gosh, not the Muslims that were screaming these things. No, no, no. People that were screaming things back to this preacher and his flock. They couldn't even print it. It was so horrible for the English papers that they couldn't even print what was said. It was just this. Words came as police charged a man who allegedly shouted abuse at the war protestors. Later is says police were already out in force to protect the antiwar group and arrested two men among the soldier supporters. You cannot say a word in England against that kind of speech! They can be shouting it but you can't shout it back because yours is hate speech; theirs is not. This is what's coming, gang. This is what's coming. And you're going to see it. You already see it in small doses. The extreme left already says the most vile, vicious, awful things. They are standing up in our churches, in front of our children screaming hate speech. And what does anybody do about it? Is that even on television? And yet you can't say marriage should be between a man and a woman, and civil unions is fine. You can't have Barack Obama's position without being torpedoed, without being a hater, unless you're Barack Obama.

Joel Rosenberg has been watching these stories for a while. He's with us now. He's got a new book out called Inside the Revolution. Joel, are you familiar with these guys in England?

ROSENBERG: I am, and I write about this in one of the chapters in terms of how many Muslims. According to research done by the Pew Foundation, for example, 15% of Muslims in the U.K. believe suicide bombings against civilian targets are sometimes or often justified. 15%. 16% of Muslims in France believe suicide bombings against civilians are justified.

GLENN: Let me go here, Joel, I saw this story, this stat reported the other day. In England one out of seven say it's okay to beat your wife if she's wearing something too sexy. Where's that one coming from?



Related article


The coming evangelical collapse

ROSENBERG: Well, try this one. Again we cite this in the book from Pew Research. 5% of Muslims in America admit that they have a favorable view of Al-Qaeda. Now, what's interesting is almost 30%, 27%, 27% refused to answer the question whether they have a favorable view of Al-Qaeda. Now, we're talking about roughly 2 1/2 million Muslims in the country, 2.3 roughly. So we're talking about if you look at these specific numbers and in terms of suicide bombings, you are talking about 9% refuse to answer the question of whether they support suicide bombings against civilian targets. 13% said they believe suicide bombings are sometimes, often justified. Now, to put that in real numbers, 23,500 Muslims in America believe suicide bombings against civilians are justified, and 164,000-plus -- I'm sorry, 211,000-plus Muslim Americans refuse to answer the question. Now, the vast majority of Muslims in the U.S. and Britain aren't radical but that's not the question. The question is how many radicals are there and how serious a threat to they pose. And that's what I'm trying to do in this book is take people inside the thinking, what they're saying, what they're teaching, what they believe and how far they are willing to go to get it.

GLENN: Okay. Here's a question, Joel. I want to stray off the path just a little bit from the Muslim extremists and flip it around. I think there are anti-God forces as well that are aligning themselves with -- I mean, you're seeing it over in Europe. When you are such a coward and you can't say, "Excuse me?" That's hate speech without being shut down. And you are argue people who are speaking out against it, that's not about freedom of speech. That is kowtowing to a special interest. And there is also, there are forces from the left that want to destroy religion as we understand it in the West, and these forces are getting stronger and stronger. Am I wrong or am I right? Please tell me I'm wrong.

ROSENBERG: Glenn, unfortunately you are right. And this is a battle of ideas. This is literally a war of ideas, and the left has been saying for a long time that religion is bad but now they seem to have discovered that one religion is fine. Radical Islam in the view of the left, not so bad. People who believe in Jesus, that's the problem. And so this is becoming a huge divide. At least if the left were consistent, then that would be a useful marker, you know, that all religion is bad. About you that's not actually what they think. They are protecting the hate speech and the actions around them.

GLENN: But they are consistent. They are consistent in this way, Joel. They are consistent in the way of not really standing for any real principle. They are only standing for the principle of their power. And help me out on this. Try this thought line out. Just as -- and the premise is that kind of thinking will destroy them in the end because of this. What we've done is we have shut up the silent majority of America that wants to mean what they say and mean what they say and without any hate or malice toward anyone, just say the truth. These people are haters. These people hate the way we live and want to destroy our way of life. These people are teaching their children what God wants you to blow yourself up so you can get virgins. That's an abomination and a perversion of anything that could possibly ever come from God. That is the truth. But because we have just said, well, you know what, we don't want to hurt anybody's feelings, we don't want to do anything, what's happened is we have given all of this power to the left and the left is like, oh, yeah, yeah, just keep quiet, just keep quiet, and we're losing our religion. We're losing our way of life. As they coopt the extremists, what they don't understand is you can't coexist. It's like us coexisting with the extreme left. You can't coexist because they want to destroy you. They don't want coexistence. The same thing: The extreme left gets in bed with these crazy radical Islamicists. They are going to lose in the end because the Islamicists want to kill everyone including Hollywood and the left.

ROSENBERG: So many Americans don't believe that. I was just in the last -- just in the first couple of days of this particular book tour, I'm getting people on shows, one particular one I'm thinking of who was saying, "Oh, come on, Joel, you are completely distorting the views of people like President Ahmadinejad in Iran. They've never said they want to annihilate America. They've never said that they want to destroy the United States and Israel. That's all being misconstrued." And, of course, I quote them directly and it's all backed up. But the point is the left doesn't want to hear it and they really think we who are trying to defend our Constitution and our culture and our, at least our freedom to believe what we want to believe and share what we want to share with our friends and neighbors, it's up to them whether they want to agree with us, the left doesn't even want to hear it and it's interesting, just again in the first 48 hours of this tour how this inside the revolution discussion even, discussion about what the radical Muslims really want in their own words from their books, from their websites, from their speeches. That infuriates the left. They don't even want to hear it. They don't believe it. They just believe that we are the enemy.

GLENN: Tonight you are going to be on television with me. Would you bring some of the actual quotes with you? Let's get some of the quotes, from their own websites, from their own things about us and what they are really trying to accomplish.

ROSENBERG: Absolutely.

GLENN: We have the video now that somebody took. It wasn't a TV camera. I mean, how much time do you spend over in England, Joel?

ROSENBERG: No, I spend time in more radical Muslim countries than that one but I guess I need to spend more time there.

GLENN: But over in Europe you spend enough time.

ROSENBERG: No, it's a problem. It's a very big problem.

GLENN: They have kowtowed for so long, they are on the verge of losing their country. Do you know -- I mean, this amazes me. We played this on television because I said this in a meeting and everybody said, no, that's not true. And I said, go look for it but if it's true, put it on television. But I'm telling you I read it in the New York Times in a little blurb. They always have a Christmas message over in England. Do you know who delivered the other Christmas message? Now they have to have a point/counterpoint message. The queen delivers the Christmas message. Do you know who delivered the other side for the queen this year?

ROSENBERG: I'm guessing an Imam but I did not see it myself.

GLENN: No, sir. Think again. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

ROSENBERG: Oh, my gosh. Wow.

GLENN: He followed the queen to present the other side for the Christmas message!

ROSENBERG: Wow.

GLENN: I mean, that's how crazy Europe and England has become.

ROSENBERG: Now, get this one, Glenn. This just in the last couple of days. You know, as I'm making the case in this book, Ahmadinejad is bringing Iran and the world to the most dangerous moment in the Islamic revolution. We're 30 years into the Islamic revolution now. But this is the most dangerous moment and you and I have talked about why. But what's interesting is to me is that just this past weekend the moderate Muslim country of Morocco whom I spend two chapters on in this book -- these are good guys -- they have just severed all diplomatic ties with Iran because Iran has gone over the edge in their belligerence, the radicalism. And yet the United States, under President Obama, has decided to engage the radical belligerent, you know, "We're bringing about the end of the world" leadership. How is Morocco more sane on this issue than our own government?

GLENN: You know, let me tell you something, because they don't understand it. They are living in a place of denial on this. Let me ask you this: How do you sit down and negotiate and have open talks with somebody who says I'll have open talks at the table. When you --

ROSENBERG: Give up your Satanic ways?

GLENN: Give up your Satanic ways.

ROSENBERG: Yeah, that's a hard negotiating position for Secretary Clinton -- how do you look someone in the eye and say, list me the Satanic ways so we could work on this. I mean, you know, how do you --

GLENN: Right. They don't believe -- because the people on our side don't believe in Satan. They don't believe in God. So they don't think that people actually mean those things. You know, they have such disregard for religion that they think, "Oh, he's just saying. He doesn't mean really Satanic ways. That's just bluster." He means it!

ROSENBERG: You know what's interesting in the heart of it, I totally agree with you, Glenn. One of the things I found over the last couple of years of crisscrossing the Islamic world is as you just alluded to with Morocco, because Moroccans are Muslim, they do understand.

GLENN: I know.

ROSENBERG: They are living inside the region and they understand it. What we're finding is mass defect shun by the millions, really by the tens of millions of Muslims from Islam.

Now, some of them, many millions, are becoming followers of Jesus Christ. Not all, and I wouldn't even say most. But it's extraordinary the soul-searching that's going on inside the Muslim world as Muslims are watching radicals kill other Muslims and saying, if that's it, if that's what it means to be a pure Muslim, I'm out. I can't do this anymore.

GLENN: Joel, I tell you, there's soul-searching going on in the entire world. I really truly believe that an enlightened period is coming. A great, great vast darkness but also a great miraculous enlightened period is coming as well because sides are being chosen.

ROSENBERG: Yes.

GLENN: And there is no middle ground. You are either going to be engaged with darkness or with light, and I think people are starting to feel that and they're starting to say, you know, they're starting to feel callings on, "Well, wait a minute." And those who don't -- those who dismiss it, those who don't root themselves in the truth I think are going to be in very, very deep trouble. I just, maybe this is me.

ROSENBERG: I'm with you on that. And I tell you, you know, there's a guy I need to introduce you to, literally, physically introduce you to. He is the Glenn Beck of the revivalists. He is an Egyptian Coptic priest named Father Zakaria Botros. I profile him inside this book in the revolution. And he reaches 50 million Muslims a day. They are watching him now by satellite television in the Muslim world. Because he's taking on Islam verse by verse, chapter by chapter, hadith by hadith and he's deconstructing it. Then because he's a believer in Jesus, he explains now this is the truth. Now, people call in to his show and they're furious.

GLENN: Okay. Joel, I'm sorry to cut you off. I have a network break but I have to tell you we'll talk more about this tonight on television.

Former White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders joined Glenn Beck on this week's podcast to share her unique perspective as a trusted adviser and confidante to President Donald Trump for two and a half years, which she also details in her new book, "Speaking for Myself: Faith, Freedom, and the Fight of Our Lives Inside the Trump White House."

Sarah described the unprecedented levels of corruption she saw firsthand during the Russia probe and shocking lengths to which Democratic leaders and the mainstream media would go to "take the president down."

Sarah said she often saw sides of Donald Trump that the media never covered. Recently, she went on the record denying the Atlantic's claims that the president mocked our military during a 2018 trip to France. She was on that trip, she told Glenn, and her account of what really happened paints a very different picture.

"The people who are making this outrageous charge are such cowards for doing so in an anonymous way. If you really believed this, and believed it was wrong, one, why did it take you so long? And, two, put your name on it the way the rest of us have," Sarah said.

"He didn't say those things. Not only was I there that day, Glenn, I spent two and a half years traveling all over the world with the president, watching him interact with men and women of our armed forces almost every single day during that two-and-a-half year period," she added.

"This is a person who loves America and loves the people who allow the rest of us to live in America, free, and have prosperity. And I got to see that a lot. I think it is shameful that people are trying to distort who he is and what he has done, particularly when it comes to the men and women in the military."

Watch a clip from the full interview with Sarah Huckabee Sanders below:

Find the full podcast below, on Glenn's YouTube channel or on Blaze Media's podcast network.


Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The Daily Beast recently reported on a group of 50-plus leading progressive organizations that calls itself the Fight Back Table or FBT, who are planning for a "post-Election Day political apocalypse scenario."

The FBT held a meeting on Zoom to launch an initiative they dubbed the "Democracy Defense Nerve Center." Meeting participants prepared for expected threats to a fair election in November, such as "armed right-wing militia dudes show[ing] up in polling places," or poll locations that "mysteriously close" on Election Day. They also predicted that President Donald Trump would claim victory regardless of November's election results, which would lead to inevitable "mass public unrest."

"It is very obvious that Trump is laying the groundwork for claiming victory no matter what ... we will fight to protect [our democracy] from what we truly see as a president who has gone off the rails and taking this country down an authoritarian fascist path," said MoveOn Executive Director Rahna Epting.

On the "Glenn Beck Radio Program," Glenn argued that the left is using large-scale mail-in voting — which unlike absentee ballots does not require voters to submit an application ahead of the election — to set the stage for chaos, revolution, and ultimately cause civil war to destroy our nation.

"No one will believe the [election] outcome because they're changing the way we're electing a president this time. And people don't understand the difference ... this is Democratic states just printing ballots and mass mailing them," Glenn said.

"They've been war-gaming this forever," he continued. "And the media is trying to make it look as if the right is the one that is violent. We're not planning anything to happen on Election Day, except to go and vote. The chaos that's coming, I think is remarkable. And if the DOJ doesn't get involved and find out who these groups are and what they have planned, you are going to have intimidation and chaos the week of the voting, and for weeks [afterward] until we go into civil war. This is not hyperbole. This is what the left is now saying."

Watch the video below to hear more from Glenn:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Netflix film 'Cuties' is darker than you thought

'Cuties'/Netflix

Plague. Recession. Riots. Looting. Fires. Murder Hornets. And now, as we round the third base toward the home stretch, 2020 gives us Cuties, a delightful French coming-of-age film by Maïmouna Doucouré that's half Stand by Me and half Coyote Ugly – if you were to combine both films into an anthropomorphic entity and then forcefully dip its toe into the perilous waters of pedophilia.

Cuties begins by showing us an 11-year-old Senegalese girl named Amy, whose fundamentalist Muslim family has recently moved to France. We learn that Amy's father has gone back to Senegal to bring home the woman who is to become his second wife. The mother's struggle is very clear to Amy, who begins right then and there to develop a hatred for her father. She starts looking for ways to rebel, and soon lands in the company of a group of ne'er-do-well girls, who fancy themselves dancers and have adopted the group name "Cuties". Their primary goal in life at the moment – and the thing that drives the film's narrative – is to participate in and win the big dance competition coming up soon. The ring-leader – a dark-haired bespectacled girl who resembles Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to such an eerie extent that it can't have been on accident – lives in Amy's building, and the two form a kind of delicate friendship throughout the film.

Here is where the movie most resembles a female version of Stand by Me, and it's also where I began to understand that this is a remarkably beautiful film at times. It's well-shot, well-scored, and well-acted. In fact, Fathia Youssouf Abdillahi (the actress who portrays Amy) is quite possibly the most talented child actor I've ever seen.

I began to understand that this is a remarkably beautiful film at times.

The portrayal of this group of girls wending their way through the thick tangles of childhood and constantly grasping at what they perceive to be higher concepts of adulthood is somehow both charming and bothersome at the same time. Knowing virtually nothing of the real world of sexuality, they engage in a kind of whimsical speculation as to how sex works that almost comically mirrors the aforementioned Oscar-winning film (and a ton of other coming-of-age movies as well). Some of this is fine. There's a particularly funny-turns-emotional moment when one of the girls, upon finding a used condom lying around in the woods, blows it up like a balloon and begins playing around with it. The other girls – who at least know enough to know that one doesn't touch such things for fear of disease – immediately recoil from her, tell her that she's going to catch AIDS, and so embarrass and frighten her that she begins to cry. The scene is, again, beautifully shot, and I found myself sympathizing with the character as she feels an overwhelming moment of ostracization-through-misadventure. In the following scene, we are treated to a montage of the girls washing her mouth out with soap, and it breaks the tension.

All of that to say that not only does this movie have plenty of redeemable moments that are on the beat film-wise, but also that it will pull you in headlong whether you want it to or not – which is what a good film is supposed to do.

But, alas, there's more. And I'm not so much talking about the risqué dancing that's done throughout the film. Here's why: as if the plot structure of every coming-of-age story didn't lay it out clearly enough for us, kids strive to be adults. The results are often hilarious, sometimes disturbing, but it's their nature. Kids want to be more like adults. And in a world – such as the one depicted in this movie – where children either can't or won't seize on the example of adulthood provided by their own parents, a vacuum is created. And nothing fills the vacuum of responsible parenting better than social media.

For the girls, it is the well from which they draw their inspiration, acceptance and love. "Likes" are the currency of the realm, and if you don't think this is true in your own kids' world today, you need to wake up and smell the Zuckerberg.

Thus, it is no surprise that these young dancing girls are modeling their very existence after what they see in online videos, and regurgitating the same back at the soulless machine. That they would be twerking and gyrating in a manner that falsely suggests they do know a thing or two about sex is normal when you consider that they're dining daily on visual and musical junk food – art perhaps not entirely without merit, but certainly without taste. And if there's one thing about the movie that phone-it-in parents might do well to see, it is perhaps the juxtaposition of budding childhood and the laissez faire morality adhered to by the demigods of popular culture. In short: these girls are just trying to be like the only set of role models afforded to them.

Here's what should (in my opinion, anyway) not be okay, though.

Aside from the moments of dancing, this film is filled with the cinematography of sexuality. When you watch any film in which there is a femme fatale character (or in some cases several of them), the way in which they are shot by the camera is extremely suggestive of overt sexuality. To quote one of my favorite online film critics: "You may not have noticed, but your brain did." Tracking shots over women's bodies, particularly up their backside or across a heaving bosom all decorated in cleavage, are a stock in trade for many filmmakers (and the only one for some of them). It's so common in the making of movies that it's often lampooned as a trope.

I'm reticent to accuse the woman who made this film of directly catering to the desires of pedophiles – but... I can't completely dismiss the idea, either.

We'll save the discussion about whether or not this is offensive when actresses in their twenties and thirties do it for another time. What I would hope we could all agree on is that you don't – in good conscience – use those same tracking shots over the bodies of a group of 11-year-old girls, even to make a point. And you certainly don't do it over and over and over throughout the course of a movie. The unstated purpose of such shots in a regular film is to give the viewer a taste of the voyeur. You wouldn't be allowed, in polite society, to walk up to a woman and stare at her from inches away, scanning down her body as if you were about to fax her someplace. But with the movie camera, you get a little taste of that. Dopamine rushes to your brain, and you're instantly glad you shelled out the twenty bucks to see the movie.

And while it's theoretically possible that the unstated purpose on behalf of the filmmaker changes when the subject is a little girl, it can't be denied or even overlooked that, for a certain subset of the viewing population, the effect does not. I'm reticent to accuse the woman who made this film of directly catering to the desires of pedophiles – but after having sat through an hour and a half of shot after shot of this very overt technique, I can't completely dismiss the idea, either.

As Amy progresses down the path that her (barely) world-wise friends have chosen, she becomes far more steeped in it, because she has no sense of the unseen boundaries which exist even in a hedonistic postmodern society such as present-day France. She spirals out of control very quickly, trying to outdo her friends in overt displays of sexuality and even violent aggressiveness. If there is a redeeming quality to the message of the movie, it is that we are fairly explicitly told through what we see her go through that this is not the best life for her. That escaping from the oppressive Muslim traditions of her family is a thing she should seek, but that this is not the way to go about it. All throughout her journey, we are subjected to close-up images of her body (and the bodies of the other girls). At one point, Amy's mother and aunt seem to be performing a kind of exorcism on her to drive out the evil rebellious spirits they believe have taken over, and Amy vibrates in the middle of the room on her knees in a paroxysm of movement which is half-dance, half-apparent-demonic possession, and all sex. I don't mean to be graphic here, but she may as well have been doing a full-on sex scene, for all the heavy breathing and gyration and rank passion that's going on. As an adult – and particularly as a parent – it made me literally feel ill to watch.

It's a beautiful final scene... but it fails to pull the film from the mire into which it's dipped.

And, if you believe the film's director, that's what you're supposed to feel. She claims that the whole intent of the movie is to get people to feel uncomfortable as they realize the hyper-sexualized nature of children in our modern world, and how it's driven by the nanny state that is social media in our modern era. Part of me wants to applaud the effort – it certainly worked on me. I walked away from my television with a feeling of nausea and a renewal of the commitment in my head toward doing anything and everything I can to make sure that my own children never watch this film. The fact that the movie ends with Amy making a choice to reclaim her childhood – that she walks away both from the more oppressive elements of her Muslim upbringing (insofar as she will be able – we are never told) and from trying to become an adult too soon (insofar as she will be able – we are also never told) and embraces just being an 11-year-old girl – that fact doesn't change what's transpired. It's a beautiful final scene – it really is – but it fails to pull the film from the mire into which it's dipped.

In summary, I can't really put any sort of seal of approval on this film, despite part of me wanting to. I generally subscribe to the idea that showing us a thing is far better than telling us a thing – but there are limits, and I think Cuties crosses them. As much as I want to believe that the director's motives are pure as the driven snow, it's not lost upon me that – as I mentioned before – one of the main characters (with whom we are meant to be sympathetic multiple times throughout the film) is very obviously meant to be the prototypical girl-who-wants-to-be-AOC. This film is at war with its own supposed message – it seeks to convey the horrors of oversexualized youth while laying out on for open display an entire smorgasbord of pedophilic fantasies. The game simply isn't worth the candle.

Osama bin Laden's niece, Noor bin Ladin (Noor's family has always spelled their name differently than her uncle) wrote an open letter to America, praising our country as "a beacon of democracy and hope for all subjugated peoples" across the world, and warning: "America, you are at the very edge of the precipice. Please wake up! Take hold! Fight for your country, and be proud of your roots! Uphold your values. Stand for your flag and your anthem. Defend your history. Don't relent in the face of those who seek to re-write it to serve their narrative and justify the destruction of your nation. You have much to cherish and protect for your sake, and ours."

Noor never stood with or supported her uncle. In fact, she grew up with an American flag proudly displayed in her childhood bedroom. Now a resident of Switzerland, she describes the chaos and destruction she's seen spread across America over the last several months.

"Watching the gratuitous violence, streets burn, buildings and statues being defaced in America over these past months, I am heartbroken to see how an entire generation was successfully brainwashed into hating the very nation that has yielded the most freedom, justice and equality anywhere in the world.

"I am also highly distressed by the blatant erosion at various levels of your most basic individual rights and freedoms as guaranteed by your Bill of Rights, from arbitrary censorship of speech to unlawful, politically motivated abuses of justice," she wrote.

Noor warned America that if we don't stand up, defend our history, and cherish the principles which make our country great, than those who have sought to undermine our country for decades will divide and destroy us from within.

"The truth is that the undoing of America has been decades in the making. The globalists, Deep State, swamp, whichever name you call them, have been hard at work to weaken America's sovereignty and standing as world leader. Intent on erecting a new system of world governance where they would be in total control, they are seeking to undermine the fundamental principle of your country, "a government for the people by the people", replacing it instead with a world order of international institutions ultimately puppeteered by a caste of technocrats, oligarchs and international bankers.

"Though your Constitution stands firmly in their way, it never deterred them. Like a trojan horse, they infiltrated governmental and intelligence agencies, and all realms of society - education, media, entertainment, culture. At their disposal, tools of mass population influence: propaganda, fake news and censorship. By pushing their marxist-socialist progressive agenda for years, they set out to destroy your fundamental values and divide you. They negated God, dissolved the family unit and dissevered us from moral objectivity, effectively leaving a vacuum of degeneracy, cognitive dissonance and absurdity in its wake," she added.

Read the full letter here.

On the radio program Friday, Glenn Beck shared several highlights from Noor's letter as well as her first-ever interview with the New York Post.

"A letter was written to America this week. I want you to listen to the words," said Glenn. "'America, you are at the very edge of the precipice. Please wake up! Take hold! Fight for your country, and be proud of your roots! Uphold your values. Stand for your flag and your anthem. Defend your history. Don't relent in the face of those who seek to re-write it to serve their narrative and justify the destruction of your nation. You have much to cherish and protect for your sake, and ours.' [...] The woman who wrote that, the woman who is an American at heart, who is warning us, is Osama bin Laden's [niece]."

Watch the video below to hear more from Glenn:

*Note: Glenn mistakenly referred to Noor Bin Ladin as Osama bin Laden's sister. She is his niece.


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.