Glenn Beck: The recession is good for your health


The Survivors Club: The Secrets and Science that Could Save Your Life


By Ben Sherwood

GLENN: Let me go to Ben Sherwood now. Hey, aren't you the author of that book thing?

SHERWOOD: Yes, sir. Aren't you the front page New York Times guy?

GLENN: Unfortunately I am. We were just looking at the we were just looking at the unemployment numbers. Stu, what are they? 665, 663,000. 663,000 people have been laid off now in the last month. Our unemployment rate is 8.5. We're going to easily hit 10% unemployment this year. And Ben, you actually say and by the way, Ben Sherwood is the author of Survivors Club. It's a great book. But you actually say that this is actually going to be good for people, the recession is. Really? It's good for people. How?

SHERWOOD: Well, you know, I went out looking for the facts about what happens to people in recessions and we all know that these numbers are, latest numbers are just awful. I mean, 663,000 jobs lost in 31 days last month. So that's 21,000 people out of work every hour and that's, in a minute that's 14 jobs lost in a minute. So no one is saying that the recession or unemployment is good. But the surprising science of recessions is that you think that bad things happen to people in recessions and you would think and for years the scientists studying the economy have said that there are lots of negative effects for people when the economy turns south. But the new science of a recession, and people have been studying this around the world for the last decade, they have found this incredible fact which is that for every 1% increase in the unemployment rate, for every 1% increase in unemployment, the mortality rate, the predicted death rate goes down .5%. So that means every time unemployment goes up 1%, about 11,000 in the United States, 11,000 predicted deaths don't happen because of the unexpected health benefits that's a strange thing to say but the unexpected health benefits from rising unemployment and economic downturn.

GLENN: I am so fascinated to hear what I mean, I'm eating pork rinds right now, man. What could the unexpected health benefit be from people losing their jobs?

SHERWOOD: So there's a professor in University of North Carolina in Greensboro, Christopher Ruhm, who is sort of the leading authority on this subject and he has studied 20 years of economic recessions in the United States and he's studied 23 European countries as well looking at what happens in the economic downturns. And he finds that when people lose their jobs, a few things happen. First of all, they are sort of, in the big picture of the economy, they tend to eat better and healthier, they tend to smoke less and they tend to, believe it or not, exercise more. And the results and he's got specific statistics. I mean incredible

GLENN: Hold it just a second.

SHERWOOD: Go ahead.

GLENN: Ben, they also commit suicide at a higher rate, they also drink more. You know, I mean, there's also a lot more stress just on the family alone.

SHERWOOD: So there's no denying that and I don't think that Professor Ruhm argues that recessions and unemployment and these things are good for mental health. In fact, he argues, of course, with the exception of suicide, he says that obviously for mental health this is a terrible, terrible thing. And Professor Ruhm does not advocate recessions to improve our health. No one is arguing that, Glenn. What I thought was fascinating, though, was there is this flip side which is that there are these unexpected health benefits overall. So you are right. Suicide according to Professor Ruhm, there are statistics that it does actually increase as the economy goes down and it decreases as the economy improves. But on these other factors and he can divide this up. So, for instance, you know, smoking goes down significantly. Severe obesity goes down. Physical activity goes up.

GLENN: Hang on just a second. I mean, Ben, that's like saying, okay, obesity goes down. Because people are probably eating less. You know, to me it's like saying, well, gas is $12 a gallon. Boy, that stinks. No, no, because there will be less highway accidents because people can't drive. I mean, we are really trying to make lemonade out of lemons here.

SHERWOOD: Not trying to make lemonade out of lemons because no one, there's not a soul here, none of the academics, and I certainly don't sort of I'm not arguing that these are good things. But when you look at the overall impact of these things, the social scientists who just try to study what happens point out, you are absolutely right, Glenn, there's less air pollution because manufacturing decreases he says, and there are fewer people driving on the roads. So that's right, traffic accidents are reduced. And the point is not again to advocate for this. The point is just that there's some fascinating science about what actually happens, and it's not just, it's not just the statistics that have long been believed and in fact these health problems increase. He actually finds a reduction in the amount of alcohol consumption. Some people drink more but overall there is a reduction in the amount of alcohol consumption.

GLENN: All right, Ben Sherwood, the name of the book is The Survivors Club. You haven't done this stuff is not in the Survivors Club but I appreciate you letting me know about this. And I have to tell you, I think what this says is that you can't have central planning because even a recession has unintended consequences and some of them are positive, you know?

SHERWOOD: Well, that's exactly that's the only reason, when I reached out to your gang about this, I just thought that it's one of those things where when you dig into any story, there's another side to the story that goes against logic, and certainly no one is a proponent of this incredibly painful job loss. I think I mentioned to you that I've just been down to a place in California, El Centro, which has the highest unemployment rate in the nation at around 25% now.

GLENN: Oh, no, no. I just read an article. There's it may be this same city. Is it a grape growing area?

SHERWOOD: Yeah, Imperial Valley, California.

GLENN: It's now 41%, Ben. That's what I read just yesterday.

SHERWOOD: And so and I was at the food banks and I was in the Salvation Army shelter and I was there with the sister Maria Luisa who's out there every day and was literally overwhelmed with the pain of the recession. So I'm not here saying that recessions are good.

GLENN: Right.

SHERWOOD: I'm saying that there are these surprising health effects that have a lot to do with the way people's behaviors change to adjust and to accommodate.

GLENN: Right.

SHERWOOD: And overall it's a surprise and it happens around the world.

GLENN: You know, it's the exact reverse of the principle that sometimes when you try to do good, sometimes you get bad. And I think that's what we're living right now. Everybody said let me help the poor get into houses, let me help, you know, let's just help everybody get rich, help everybody have the American dream, et cetera, et cetera. Everybody trying to do good but it turned out quite, quite bad and, you know, some of us thought that made common sense but unfortunately too many in Washington didn't see that common sense. Ben, thanks a lot.

We did our homework over the weekend; we did the research so we can tell you what is likely coming from Senate Democrats regarding President Trump's Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett. Based on our research and the anonymous people who have already come forward to talk about Coney Barrett's youth, these are the main shocking things you can expect Senate Democrats to seize on during the confirmation process…

A man has come forward under the banner of "#MenToo," to say that in second grade, Amy Coney Barrett and her best friend at the time, cornered him at a birthday party at Chuck-E-Cheese and "injected him with a full dose of cooties." Which, if true, would obviously be disqualifying for serving on the highest court in the land.

Then there's a woman who says when she was nine-years-old, she lived on the same street as Amy Coney Barrett. She alleges that Coney-Barrett borrowed her VHS tape of Herbie Goes Bananas and did not return it for at least six months. And then when she did finally get the tape back, the woman says Coney Barrett did not even bother to rewind it. The FBI has interviewed at least two witnesses so far who say the tape was indeed not rewound and that it was very upsetting to the owner of the tape. Again, if true, this is troubling – clearly not the kind of integrity you want to see in a Supreme Court justice.

Apparently, in their elementary school days, they liked to drink milk – and lots of it.

The same neighbor also dropped a bombshell allegation about the drinking problem of Amy Coney Barrett and her closest friends. Apparently, in their elementary school days, they liked to drink milk – and lots of it. The neighbor says she "frequently" witnessed Coney-Barrett and her friends chugging entire cartons of milk – often Whole Milk, sometimes Chocolate Milk, occasionally both at the same time through a funnel.

Unfortunately, shooting-up cooties, injurious rewinding, and potential calcium-abuse are not even the worst of it.

A third person has now come forward, another man, and this is just reprehensible, it's hard to even fathom. But he alleges that in fourth grade, when they were around ten-years-old, Amy Coney Barrett and a group of "four or five of her friends" gang-GRAPED him on the playground during recess. He alleges the group of friends snuck uneaten grapes out of the cafeteria and gang-GRAPED him repeatedly in broad daylight. In other words, and I hate to have to spell this out because it's kind of graphic, but the group led by ten-year-old Amy Coney Barrett pelted this poor defenseless boy with whole grapes. He recalls them "laughing the whole time" as they were gang-GRAPING him.

He recalls them "laughing the whole time" as they were gang-GRAPING him.

Obviously, even if just one of these allegations is half-true, no Senator with a conscience could possibly vote to confirm Coney Barrett. When there is a clear pattern of destructive childhood behavior, it always continues into adulthood. Because people do not change. Ever.

Fortunately, for the sake of the Republic, Democrats plan to subpoena Coney Barrett's childhood diary, to see what, if any, insights it may provide into her calcium habits, as well as her abuse of illicit cooties and the gang-GRAPING incident.

We will keep you posted on the latest, but for now, it looks like Democrats will find plenty in the reckless pre-teen life of Amy Coney Barrett to cast doubt on her nomination. And if not, they can always fall back on her deranged preference for letting babies be born.

[NOTE: The preceding was a parody written by MRA writer Nathan Nipper.]

On the radio program Friday, Glenn Beck discussed the recent news that a primary source for the Steele Dossier — the document on which much of the Trump-Russia collusion investigation was based — had been investigated by the FBI for contacts with suspected Russian spies. Glenn also shared several previously unpublished texts and emails from FBI agents have recently been released.

According to a letter sent by Attorney General William Barr to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Thursday, the FBI knew early on that the research compiled by ex-British intelligence agent Christopher Steele relied on a "Primary Sub-source" that had been "the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation from 2009 to 2011 that assessed his or her contacts with suspected Russian intelligence officers" — but still used it to obtain warrants to spy on former Trump campaign-aide Carter Page.

But, it gets even worse. Now, new leaked texts and communications from FBI agents within the department at the time of the entire Russian collusion effort were disclosed in federal court filings on Thursday. According to the court documents, FBI agents purchased "professional liability insurance" to protect themselves in January 2017, just weeks before Donald Trump was inaugurated president, because they were concerned about the agency's potentially illegal activity during the Russia collusion investigation.

"Trump was right," one FBI employee wrote in response to then-President-elect Trump's Jan 3, 2017 tweet which read: "The 'Intelligence' briefing on so-called 'Russian hacking' was delayed until Friday, perhaps more time needed to build a case. Very strange!"

Watch the video below for more details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Chief researcher Jason Buttrill joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Thursday to discuss an "explosive" new report released Wednesday by Senate Republicans on Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, and the Ukrainian energy company Burisma.

Among other serious allegations, the 87-page report claims that "Hunter Biden received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the wife of the former mayor of Moscow," and the richest woman in Russia.

"The transactions discussed [in the report] are designed to illustrate the depth and extent of some questionable financial transactions. Moreover, the financial transactions illustrate serious counterintelligence and extortion concerns relating to Hunter Biden and his family," the report stated.

Jason suggested the Senate's findings provide additional evidence to back allegations of a money-laundering scheme, which Glenn detailed in a four-part series about Biden's shady connections to Ukraine. Learn more on this here.

"Laundered money is very hard to track to its finality," Jason explained. "I'm sure the Biden camp is really hoping that it just looks suspicious, but [investigators] don't ever find the eventual end point. But, if they do – and it's possible they already have – this is going to be explosive, very explosive."

Watch the video below for more details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Revolutions rarely happen overnight. The Left started laying the groundwork for November 3, 2020, the moment Hillary Clinton had to concede the 2016 election to Donald Trump. It was always solely about getting rid of President Trump — and there's a playbook for that.

Last week, Glenn Beck showed you the "Seven Pillars of Color Revolution" written by a former U.S. diplomat, which are the conditions that must be in place for a successful Eastern European-style "Color Revolution." The left seems to be pushing for a Color Revolution this election because they are using the exact same playbook.

In part two of this series, Glenn peels back the layers on the first four of these Color Revolution pillars to show you how they work and what the end goal is. And he reveals one of the architects of the playbook – a Color Revolution specialist, former ambassador, and former Obama administration official who is one of the key masterminds of this revolution.

Joining Glenn is political campaign veteran and BlazeTV host Steve Deace who says the polls that claim Biden is leading the race "are trash." We're being set up to believe that if Trump wins in spite of the polls, it must be an invalid election.

Watch the full video below:


WATCH all of Glenn's Specials on BlazeTV:

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multiplatform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Save $10 with promo code GLENN.