Glenn Beck: Libs blame conservatives for crazy shooter...again


Stay up to date with Michelle Malkin at her website, http://michellemalkin.com/

GLENN: Let's go to Michelle. Hi, Michelle.

MALKIN: Hey, Glenn.

GLENN: How are you?

MALKIN: Good, how are you?

GLENN: Well, if all of these rightwing extremists weren't killing people, you know.

MALKIN: Yeah.

GLENN: It's amazing to me how the media is making, first of all, crazy people into rightwingers and Nazis into rightwingers. They are fascists.

MALKIN: Yeah.

GLENN: I mean, how did fascism become rightwing?

MALKIN: Well, it's interesting how the police Cal compass gets reset and goes out of whack when it serves the narratives and the purposes of the mainstream media. And, you know, it was just a couple of weeks ago that we had these two awful acts of domestic terrorism with George Tiller and with the killer of Private William Long. And I remarked then that the narrative is always that when a so called rightwing vigilante kills, millions of fingers pull the trigger. But when what looks like a leftwing vigilante kills, he kills alone. And this is what's happening again. And you see that the usual suspects, me, you, Fox News, the tea parties, anyone who protests the expansion of government gets indicted along with the lone nut that actually pulls the trigger. And in this case James von Brunn was an equal opportunity hater. This guy is a lifetime loon. You've got the left neat blogosphere and cable TV pointing the finger as you or I were the one that pointed the trigger or implanted in this lunatic's head the racist not just anti Semitic but anti every color, anti Christian for that matter conspiracy theorist of, you know, as if we were the ones responsible for turning this guy into what he has been for most of his adult life.

GLENN: These are the guys that I have been preaching about and saying we have got to be very careful. I've been saying for a long time that these guys are people like these are very dangerous. Two years ago I said that Al Qaeda is going to get into bed. Muslim extremists will get into bed with these militia groups and these rightwing extremists or not rightwing extremists. These militia groups. And they will band together. We have the videotape from, where was it, Saudi Arabia last week or Egypt last week where Al Qaeda was saying that one of the guys who, you know, was meeting with Osama Bin Laden saying we're getting into bed with these militia groups and everything else. There are anarchists and crazy people and that they want to destroy the country and they will do what crazy people do.

MALKIN: Exactly. And anyone who has actually listened to your show or read what I write in my columns or on the blogs knows that, you know, for most of my professional career and I'm sure this is true of you, too, we've done nothing but separate ourselves from these people who have absolutely nothing in common with our readership, with our viewership and with our self. And when they talk and this is the point that you just made they have far more in common with Al Qaeda and the jihadists and home grown terrorists that much of the political left has turned a blind eye towards. And, you know, I go back to the very disparate treatment between the military recruiter attack and the abortion clinic attack and I think that we're seeing this here, too. The wretched excess on the part of these liberals and these partisans to turn this into some sort of political gain, political game for that matter. There's no sobriety on their part. This heroic security guard, Stephen Johns is a hero. We should be coming together in unity to mourn this death and instead you've got the likes of Markos Moulitsas, the head of, you know, the most influential leftwing blog at the Daily Kos exulting in every other Twitter post about how, you know, this is an embarrassment to the rightwing and we're responsible for it. You know, get a grip; grow up.

GLENN: Let me ask you about Jeremiah Wright. You see what he said over the weekend?

MALKIN: Oh, certainly did. Certainly did.

GLENN: The president won't talk to Jeremiah Wright because of them Jews.

MALKIN: Them Jews.

GLENN: Now, when Jeremiah Wright says "Them Jews ain't gonna let him talk to me, an ethnic cleansing is going on in Gaza, ethnic cleansing by the Zionist is a sin and a crime against humanity and they won't want Barack talking like that because they will say that he's anti Israel." What's the difference between the language of an anti Semite that is also nuts and goes, kills people, and the language of Jeremiah Wright?

MALKIN: Yeah. I'd like to hear from some of these people on the left how they explain that away. I'd like to hear from the White House for that matter how he explains that away. I'm certainly glad that President Obama spoke up about the need to be vigilant against anti Semitism yesterday, but where was he when he was sitting in the pews of this virulent anti Semite for almost 20 years and not saying a word about it? And it wasn't, of course, just Jeremiah Wright that spewed this Jew bashing rhetoric. It was pretty much every minister that Barack Obama surrounded himself with, from Michael Pfleger to Eric Lee to, you know, a number of these collared ministers who spoke from the pulpit the same way that James von Brunn did on his hate site.

GLENN: The difference is Jeremiah Wright hasn't gone out and killed anybody. James von Brunn has. Which makes both of them an anti Semite, only one of them a killer.

MALKIN: Right, you know, but of course we haven't killed anyone, either, but we're being indicted for it although we've never spewed this kind of anti Semitic rhetoric and I've always, always condemned it.

GLENN: Let me ask you this, Michelle. I contend that the people in the right, you know, in anyone who is a conservative and on the right traditionally speaking, probably a bigger fan of Israel than anyone on the left, a bigger defender of Israel, a bigger defender of the Jews. I mean, I have a lot of friends who have said to me, "What the hell is wrong with all of the Jewish people? Are they not seeing what's coming again? Are they not seeing it? How can they be in bed with people who are going down the road of anti Semitism?"

MALKIN: Exactly. And that certainly was the internal debate during this last campaign among, you know, Republican Jews who stood by and watched as, you know, their brethren on the left championed somebody who sat in Jeremiah Wright's pews for 20 years. And, you know and I can speak for the right, quote/unquote, on the blogosphere. And time and again we have stood with Israel and with the Jewish people in particular as the rise of anti Semitism that has been stoked by the acceptable jihadist apologist here at home and abroad. And, you know, I recall during the whole Mohammed cartoon controversy that there were very few Jews on the left who stood, for example, with the Denmark cartoonist who did nothing but tell the truth about Mohammed and, you know, in many cases just simply drew innocuous pictures of Mohammed. But again there was a worldwide conflagration, and the rhetoric from these jihadian apologist about the annihilation from Israel, there is one commander in chief of this country who is willing to sit down with the leader of this country that wants to annihilate Israel with a nuclear button, and it's not somebody on the right wings.

GLENN: Michelle, let me get your opinion on how I feel like we're living in 1932 again to where you know that there were people that knew in Germany. You know. And everyone was in denial. I mean, have you read Mein Kampf?

MALKIN: Not all the way through, and I should.

GLENN: Yeah. I've read it, and I read it because I wanted to know did the German people know. The answer is clear: Yes, they knew. They had to have known. And I never understood how they sat by, and I don't understand today, taking this out of a Jewish thing and just looking at it as the direction this country is headed right now, we are headed with what's happening with GM, with what's on the front page of the Wall Street Journal today, Fed e mails bash Bank of America chief in tussle over deal. You have the secretary of the treasury saying the magnitude of losses at Merrill Lynch is breathtaking. They are saying now, the Bank of America chief is saying that he fears lawsuits from shareholders. I don't think that's very likely and I said so but Merrill is really scary and ugly. They lied and pushed Merrill Lynch or pushed Bank of America into this Merrill Lynch deal. They are strong arming every step of the way these businesses. We are headed towards a kind of government that is absolutely unrecognizable in America and yet the American people sit by and are like, well, I guess; I don't know. You've got people who are doing tea parties, you have people who are speaking out, but you don't have the mass population saying, "Wait a minute, don't you see where we're headed?" What is it going to take, Michelle?

MALKIN: You'd like to think that there's been enough already to push millions more people than have already joined the tea party movement. But I think one of the reasons why it's important for us to speak out against what's happening with the left and how they are exploiting awful shootings like yesterday is because, I mean, one of the reasons why people don't want to speak out is because they don't want to be tarred as homicidal maniacs.

GLENN: But that is what you wait until you see this review of you know, I did the comedy tour. I've been doing these comedy tours for years. There's a new review out. The New York Times ripped me apart. Vanity Fair ripped me apart. Time magazine just did a review of it, just came out about an hour ago. They called me an extremist how many times, Stu? Several times they called me an extremist. You know what? You can call me an extremist all you want. All you want. You are not going to frighten me into shutting up. I am not an extremist. I'm an American that believes in the Constitution. And Americans have got to stand up and not be afraid of being called an extremist.

MALKIN: That's exactly right and that's why it's important to do what you're doing and for the untold numbers of people who are individual citizen activists on the grassroots, in the blogosphere. It's not just about Fox News and the tea parties and talk radio. It's about people being unafraid to stand up for their principles in their own neighborhoods and at the grocery store. You know, we've got this massive monumental battle underway now over the government healthcare takeover, and people are afraid to speak out about that. And they cannot be, because this is about their lives, it's about the present, it's about their children's future, it's about their grandchildren's future. And if they wake up in the morning and they feel intimidated or bullied because they are afraid that some MSNBC yacker is going to accuse them of killing people or creating a climate of hate, then they are only writing themselves and their future out of existence.

GLENN: They really are.

MALKIN: You cannot be afraid to do that. You have to be able to endure the ridicule and the mockery and the vitriol because otherwise why did the founding fathers do what they did and why did so many people die to ensure the future of this country if we wake up and we are afraid to do what we do?

GLENN: We are headed towards a McCarthy era. I really believe, I think that I really think that the silence from Washington and the White House is the loudest thing that I've ever heard, the silence of Barack Obama not saying don't tear these people apart. They have a right to do these things in the tea parties, et cetera, et cetera. George Bush was out talking about Cindy Sheehan, I'm wrong, she's wrong, but I support her ability to be able to do that, yada, yada. This is I really think that they are letting things spiral out of control and adding to it intentionally.

MALKIN: You know, that is a really good point about the silence of the White House on this. And if you compare George Bush just as you say, you know, this is a guy who bent over backwards in the weeks after September 11th to talk about how Islam was a religion of peace and invited all of the jihadi friendly and jihadi helper groups to the White House. He brought C.A.R.E. in, he brought the AADC in. Where is Barack Obama to extend an olive branch and to defend the free speech of the likes of you and me and to, you know, to give more than lip service to his so called post partisan stature? No, you don't see that at all, and this is very, very damning. And I think it shows you that he is nothing more than a political, a creature of political expedience. And if it doesn't completely shatter the myth of hope and change, I don't know what does.

GLENN: Well, I mean, you know, you've got David Letterman making fun of Sarah Palin's children. When are we going to call children off limits? When is that finally going to happen? When are people let me tell you something. David Letterman, the guy's going to be done because he's going to alienate. He's going to create, he's going to paint himself into the Katie Couric box to where everybody's like, "Well, I know exactly who this guy is," and he will alienate himself from half of the population. Michelle, I've got to run but thank you so much.

MALKIN: Thanks a lot, Glenn.

GLENN: You bet. We'll talk again. All right, what did you say? Oh, you can read her latest article at MichelleMalkin.com.

How prepared are YOU to weather a future crisis? We recently published a brand new quiz so you can find out exactly how prepared you are. Whether you're a "prepper" with a bunker fit for the apocolypse or just want to feel more secure for the future, there is always something more to learn. That's why Glenn wants to give his newsletter subscribers his "Ultimate Preparation Guide," filled with practical tips for building a solid foundation to weather future crises. And let's face it—in our crazy world right now, who couldn't use a bit more peace of mind?

Enter your email below to get "Glenn's Ultimate Preparation Guide" sent straight to your inbox!

Editor's Note: Arizona House Bill HB2770 has since been shut down! AZ Rep. Rachel Jones tweeted that the AZ Freedom Caucus shut down the bill before it could reach the board. It is encouraging to see states stepping to protect the American people from getting one step closer to a Central Bank Digital Currency. Hopefully, Arizona will be a precedent for the other states!

On today's radio broadcast, Glenn warned about dangerous Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) language being smuggled into routine legislation in REPUBLICAN-led states. This is unacceptable, and as Glenn said, we can't let this legislation pass as it now stands.

The legislation being used to smuggle in this CBDC language is the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), a routine piece of legislation passed on the state level that helps standardize commercial and business transactions. However, a new round of UCCs being deliberated RIGHT NOW amongst a swath of Republican-led states anticipate the use of "electronic money." In a public letter sent to the Republican states currently deliberating this legislation, the Pro-Family Legislative Network said this can only refer to the Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) under consideration and testing by the Federal Reserve. Biden's Executive Order 14067 issued in March of 2022 started the push for CBDC, and now these states, knowingly or unknowingly, are laying the legislative groundwork for making CBDC a reality.

There is absolutely no reason why Republican-led states should aid in laying the foundation for CBDC, yet 12 of them are deliberating it RIGHT NOW, with one UCC bill already on one GOP governor's desk! We have to act NOW to stop these UCCs in their tracks and demand our lawmakers amend the bills without the "electronic money" language.

If your state is listed below, contact your representative NOW to put an end to CBDC language.

1. North Dakota

North Dakota House Bill HB1082 passed BOTH chambers and is now sitting on Governor Burgum's desk. Burgun has 3 DAYS to veto this bill once it's placed on his desk—if not, it will pass automatically. If you are a North Dakota resident, it is absolutely CRUCIAL that you contact Governor Burgum's office NOW and demand that he veto this bill and re-introduce it without the "electronic money" language.

2. Arizona

Arizona House Bill HB2770 has been SHUT DOWN! See the above editor's note for more details.

Arizona House Bill HB2770 passed the House majority and minority caucuses. Arizona residents, contact your representative's office NOW so that they amend this bill without the "electronic money" language.

3. Arkansas

Arkansas House Bill HB1588 is in committee, and if passed, will head to the House floor. Though the bill is only in its beginning stages, it's important for Arkansas residents to stop this bill in its tracks and amend it without the "electronic money" language.

4. Missouri

Missouri House Bill HB1165 is also in its beginning stages in committee. That means it's important to contact your representative as soon as possible to amend it without the "electronic money" language.

5. Oklahoma

Oklahoma House Bill HB 2776 passed the House Committee and will go to a chamber vote soon. If passed, it will go to the Senate, then the governor's desk. If you are an Indiana resident, contact your representative's office NOW to amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

6. Indiana

Indiana Senate Bill SB0486 passed the Senate and is headed to the House. Republicans control Indiana's executive office and BOTH chambers of the legislature. There is no excuse for this bill to pass. If you are an Indiana resident, it's vital you contact your representative NOW and demand they amend this bill without the "electronic money" language.

7. Kentucky

Kentucky Senate Bill SB64 passed the Senate and is now being deliberated in the House. If you live in Kentucky, contact your representative's office to amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

8. Montana

Montana Senate Bill SB370 passed the Senate and was sent to the House on March 3rd. If you are a Montana resident, contact your representative's office NOW so that the bill doesn't without changing the "electronic money" language.

9. Nebraska

Nebraska's Legislative Bill LB94 passed committee and the first floor vote. As Nebraska only has one legislative chamber, this bill is dangerously close to passing the legislature and being sent to the governor's desk. If you are a Nebraska resident, contact your representative's office NOW and demand they amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

10. New Hampshire

New Hampshire House Bill HB584 is currently in House committee deliberations and has not yet reached the House floor. If you are a New Hampshire resident, contact your representative's office NOW to amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

11. Tennessee

Tennessee House Bill HB0640 didn't successfully pass the House. However, it was deferred to a Senate committee and has now taken the form of Senate Bill SB0479, which is now in committee. This bill is still alive, and it's important for you, Tennessee residents, to stop it before it reaches the floor! Contact your representative to amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

12. Texas

Texas House Bill HB5011 was filed and is ready to be taken up by committee. Fellow Texans, let's not let this bill progress any further! Contact your representative and demand they amend the bill without the "electronic money" language.

6 things you NEED to know about the Silicon Valley Bank collapse

NurPhoto / Contributor | Getty Images

Silicon Valley Bank's collapse is sparking traumatic memories of the 2008 financial crash. Should we be worried SVB is signaling a similar economic catastrophe, or is everyone overreacting to the media's hype? Glenn told his listeners to be "healthily terrified." This event is sure to have ripple effects throughout the economy, but the more you are informed about it, the more you can prepare. Here are 6 things you need to know about Silicon Valley Bank's crash—explained in simple words.

1. The short answer to what happened: SVB didn't have enough money to pay its depositors.

Remember the scene from It's a Wonderful Life when all of the residents make a run on George Bailey's bank demanding their money? Fortunately for them, their money was in the altruistic hands of George Bailey, who used his honeymoon savings to give the depositors the money they demanded.

Silicon Valley Bank's depositors weren't so lucky.

In short, the depositors made a run on Silicon Valley Bank, demanding the withdrawal of their money. But SVB simply didn't have the liquid money available to give their depositors, causing regulators to shut down the bank shortly afterward.

2. It all started with COVID...

Why didn't SVB have enough money for its depositors? To explain this, we have to go back to the pandemic era.

The pandemic saw a rapid decrease in spending and a massive increase in bank deposits. Due to the uncertainty of the future and lockdowns limiting ways to spend money on recreational activities, like restaurants, bars, and other outlets, many Americans stocked up money in their accounts. In fact, SVB's deposits doubled in 2021 alone, bringing in more money than they could lend out to their clients.

To make a return on their available cash, SVB wanted to invest it, as many banks do. Since they had reached their lending limit, they decided to invest it in U.S. Treasury Securities, which are the government's means of funding itself without using taxation (in a nutshell). These are considered "ultra-safe" investments because they are backed by the "full faith and credit of the federal government."

Unlike other forms of investments, investing in Treasuries means the government will do everything within its legal power to pay back the money used to fund itself. In other words, it is typically very safe... so what happened?

3. Then came the magic cocktail—record-high inflation and rising interest rates...

Interest rates ruined the typically "ultra-safe" investment. Due to 40-year record-high inflation, the Fed lifted rates eight times by a total of 4.25 percentage points in 2022, raising interest rates from 0.25 percent to 4.375 percent. This means the value of U.S. Treasuries investments plummeted rapidly. SVB reported that it lost $1.8 billion due to the decreased value of its Treasuries investments after a year of rising interest rates.

This raises the following question: why didn't SVB just weather the storm and wait for interest rates to decrease? There are two issues with this. The first is that, with so many of their assets held up in Treasuries investments, SVB still wouldn't have enough liquid assets to give their depositors during the bank run.

The second issue is that Treasuries investments have a ten-year limit. In 2021 during the Trump administration, interest rates were at an all-time low of 0.125 percent.

The record-fast increase of interest rates in 2022 caused very little chance for rates to go back down to their historic 2021 lows within ten years for banks to make their money back on their investments.

To avoid this, SVB planned to sell their investments at a loss and re-purchase Treasuries investments at the decreased value, giving them an extra ten years to bet on decreased interest rates in the future.

But people caught on to SVB's plan and didn't want to ride with the risk.

4. Account holders withdrew their money... FAST.

As aforementioned, SVP lost $1.8 billion when it sold its depleted Treasuries investments. While they were betting on being able to re-purchase the devalued securities, hoping that they would go up in value in the future with lowered interest rates, investors were worried about the risk.

Once they made the announcement of their $1.8 billion loss, their stocks began to drop, and venture capitalists warned the companies they invest in to pull out of SVB. This had a snowball effect, leading to a "bank run" of depositors demanding to withdraw their money from their SVB accounts.

This led to the perfect storm: SVB's investment losses coupled with the influx of withdrawals were so immense that regulators had to step in and shut the bank down to protect depositors. The government currently "running" SVB, for all practical purposes, is the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The FDIC closed SVB on Friday and reopened the bank on Monday, March 13th as the Deposit Insurance Bank of Santa Clara.

5. Some people may lose their money. 

Banks insure accounts with $250,000 or less with FDIC insurance. That means, in cases of bank failure, exactly like this one, the FDIC covers all accounts less than $250,000. The FDIC said SVB customers who had less than $250,000 in their accounts will have access to all of their money when the bank reopens. Since it reopened this week, they should have access to their funds.

However, many of SVB's depositors had more than $250,000 in their accounts—it is Silicon Valley after all. Therefore, their accounts were not covered by FDIC insurance. Will they get their money back? There is a chance that they will not.

It is unclear how much SVB currently has to cover uninsured deposits. It is likely not enough. The FDIC has issued a "Receiver's Certificate" to the uninsured account holders with the amount in their account that is not covered by FDIC insurance.

The FDIC said it will pay some of the uninsured deposits by next week by liquidating any additional assets held by SVB. However, if the liquidated assets are not enough, many of SVB's uninsured account holders could lose their money for good.

6. Is this 2008 all over again?

SVB's collapse was the largest bank failure since 2008, when Washington Mutual failed with $307 billion in assets. Its failure, along with the collapse of the Lehman Brother's investment bank, triggered the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Are we in danger of repeating 2008?

Some argue that we are not in danger of another economic catastrophe, simply because SVB holds less than 1 percent of the nation's assets. However, as Glenn warns, there is a danger of banks repeating the same mistakes as SVP.

SVP wasn't the only bank to use its surplus deposits to invest in U.S. Treasuries, which means that other banks are wrestling with the depleted value of their securities investments due to rising interest rates.

Bank of America, for example, lost $109 billion in their securities investments due to rising interest rates, the most among its peers—and Bank of America is no small fish in the ocean of assets.

Other major banks recorded other massive losses in their securities investments due to rising interest rates. JP Morgan Chase lost $36 billion, Wells Fargo lost $41 billion, Citigroup lost $25 billion, and Goldman Sachs lost $1 billion. If the little banks collapse, will they get the same effort and attention from the federal government as the "big guys?"

The critic may argue that these are still small values given the incredibly large amount of assets held in banks nationwide. However, this is missing the point. Major banks have majorly invested in securities since the pandemic-era skyrocketing rate of deposits. Now those investments are depleted in value.

They can either sell those investments at a loss, or they can wait and hope that they will recover over time. However, if those investments are no longer liquid, what happens when their depositors come knocking? Will they have enough liquid assets to cover a massive bank run? These are the lingering questions that our banks need to address.

As Glenn says, this will impact you—it is only a matter of time. What will you do to prepare?

Glenn just purchased the entire historical Roe v. Wade archive as a solemn reminder of our nation's past and the vital importance of honoring the sacredness of life. Since Roe was overturned in 2022, many states have been stepping up to protect both their unborn citizens AND the mothers carrying them.

Which states are doing the most to protect their most vulnerable? Here are the top 12 states with the strictest laws against abortion.

1. Alabama

​Alabama has some of the nation's most protective pro-life measures, banning all abortions in the case of life-threatening circumstances for the mother. That means abortion is banned at every ​stage of pregnancy. Health care providers found guilty of performing abortions face a class-A felony, the most serious charge besides Capitol Murder, with the potential of carrying a life sentence in prison. However, the pill, Plan B, is classified as "contraception" rather than abortion. Taxpayer-funded Medicaid does not cover abortion procedures except in very limited circumstances.

Alabama is one of the few states to add protections within its state constitution for the unborn. The state:

Acknowledges, declares, and affirms that it is the public policy of this state to recognize and support the sanctity of unborn life and the rights of unborn children, including the right to life.

2. Arkansas

Like Alabama, Arkansas bans abortion at every stage of pregnancy except in life-threatening situations for the mother. However, Plan B is still considered "contraception" and is legal. Taxpayer-funded Medicaid does not cover abortion procedures except in very limited circumstances. Additionally, Arkansas added the amendment to its state constitution, declaring:

The policy of Arkansas is to protect the life of every unborn child from conception until birth, to the extent permitted by the Federal Constitution.

3. Idaho

Idaho bans abortions at every stage of pregnancy with the exceptions of life-threatening situations to the mother and instances of rape and incest. The health care practitioner who gave an abortion must prove "affirmative defense," which means they have to prove in court why the abortion is necessary and meets the legal criteria. Patients approved for abortion must wait 24 hours after counseling to receive the procedure. Anyone who performs an abortion unless it's in one of the approved cases will face felony charges. Like Alabama and Arkansas, taxpayer-funded Medicaid does not cover abortion procedures.

Unlike Alabama and Arkansas, Idaho law does not include explicit constitutional or statutory protections for abortion.

4. Kentucky

Kentucky has also banned abortion at all stages of pregnancy except in life-threatening situations for the mother. There are no exceptions for rape or incest. However, abortion providers are fighting the all-out ban on abortion through appealing to the state's previous abortion ban after six weeks of pregnancy. The appeal is ongoing.

Though Kentucky voters voted down a proposal to add an amendment to the state constitution banning abortion, the state adopted the following policy towards abortion in 2018:

Children, whether born or unborn, are the greatest natural resource in the Commonwealth of Kentucky.

5. Louisiana

Louisiana also banned abortion at all stages of pregnancy with no exceptions for rape or incest. However there is an appeal to allow abortions in the case of rape and incest. Healthcare practitioners who violate this ban are subject to criminal prosecution. Moreover, Louisiana adopted an amendment in their state constitution—specifically, the Louisiana Declaration of Rights, banning the construction of any constitutional right to abortion:

To protect human life, nothing in present constitution shall be construed to secure or protect a right to abortion or require the funding of abortion.

6. Mississippi

Mississippi bans all abortions except to save the life of the mother or in cases of rape or incest that have been reported to law enforcement. Though Mississippi did not adopt a constitutional amendment to ban abortion as a right, the Mississippi Code says:

Abortion carries significant physical and psychological risks to the maternal patient, and these physical and psychological risks increase with gestational age.

Moreover, doctors who perform illegal abortions face civil and criminal charges.

7. Missouri

Missouri bans all abortions except in the case of a medical emergency concerning the mother, with no exceptions for rape or incest. Those seeking to get an abortion must prove "affirmative defense," which means they have to prove in court why the abortion is necessary and meets the legal criteria. Minors seeking an abortion through "affirmative defense" must do so with parental consent. Moreover, those seeking an abortion must be offered an ultrasound.

Moreover, Missouri adopted the following statute protecting the unborn:

It is the intention of the general assembly of the state of Missouri to: (1) [d]efend the right to life of all humans, born and unborn; (2) [d]eclare that the state and all of its political subdivisions are a ‘sanctuary of life’ that protects pregnant women and their unborn children; and (3) [r]egulate abortion to the full extent permitted by the Constitution of the United States, decisions of the United States Supreme Court, and federal statutes.

8. Oklahoma

Oklahoma was the first state to successfully ban all abortions after conception following the overturn of Roe v. Wade and continues to lead the way as one of the toughest states on abortion. Exceptions include life-saving procedures for the mother or pregnancies resulting from "rape, sexual assault, or incest." Those who perform legal abortions can be reported and prosecuted criminally under state law HB427 and be charged at least $10,000 per illegal abortion procedure. Violations also include insurance companies or private citizens caught funding abortions.

Though Oklahoma has not adopted a state constitutional amendment concerning abortion, its Public Health Code states that it cannot be “construed as creating or recognizing right to abortion."

9. South Dakota

South Dakota bans all abortions except in life-threatening cases for the mother. There are no exceptions for rape and incest. However, it is legal to travel out of state to get an abortion. There are no state constitutional provisions protecting against abortion.

10. Tennessee

Tennessee bans all abortions except in life-threatening cases for the mother. There is currently a movement in the Tennessee state legislature to enact exceptions for rape and incest. Like Idaho and Missouri, healthcare practitioners who gave an abortion must prove "affirmative defense," which means they have to prove in court why the abortion is necessary and meets the legal criteria. Those who provide abortions illegally can be criminally prosecuted.

Tennessee's state constitution was amended to supersede a 2000 Tennessee supreme court case, which held:

A woman’s right to terminate her pregnancy is a vital part of the right to privacy guaranteed by the Tennessee Constitution [and that] the right is inherent in the concept of ordered liberty embodied in our constitution and is therefore fundamental.

The new state constitutional amendment reads as follows:

Nothing in this Constitution secures or protects a right to abortion or requires the funding of an abortion.

11. Texas

Texas bans all abortions except in life-threatening cases concerning the mother. There is a movement in the Texas state legislature to provide exemptions for rape and incest.

Moreover, Texas received a lot of heat for its law not only criminalizing providing illegal abortions but enabled citizens to report illegal abortions. However, several cities in Texas are pushing back against the abortion ban. After Dobbs, Texas increased the penalties for performing an abortion up to life in prison, including a civil penalty of no less than $100,000 per abortion performed.

Attorney General Ken Paxton said the following:

Now that the Supreme Court has finally overturned Roe, I will do everything in my power to protect mothers, families, and unborn children, and to uphold the state laws duly enacted by the Texas Legislature.

The cities of Austin and San Antonio passed ordinances preventing city funds from being used to investigate the provision or receipt of abortion care.

12. West Virginia

West Virginia bans abortion at all stages of pregnancy, except in the case of a “nonmedically viable fetus”, ectopic pregnancy, or medical emergency. According to the West Virginia state legislature, "Nonmedically viable fetus" means:

A fetus that contains sufficient lethal fetal anomalies so as to render the fetus medically futile or incompatible with life outside the womb in the reasonable medical judgment of a reasonably prudent physician.

Victims of rape and incest can obtain abortions up to eight weeks after conception, but only if they report to law enforcement first.

In 2018, West Virginians voted to add the following language to the state constitution:

Nothing in this Constitution secures or protects a right to abortion or requires the funding of abortion.