Vince Flynn - Pursuit of Honor



Pursuit of Honor


by Vince Flynn

GLENN: From high above Times Square, third most listened to show in all of America. Hello, you sick twisted freak. Welcome to the program. The one, the only Vince Flynn is here. Hey, Vince, how are you?

FLYNN: Now that you've risen to the status of superstar, you are now protected by a cocoon of glass.

GLENN: Yes, I am. You cannot enter my space.

FLYNN: I can't come within 20 feet of you.

GLENN: That's exactly right. I've read your books. You are a killer. What kind of guy, what kind of guy you don't talk into it that way, Vince. You talk into in flat like that, okay?

FLYNN: I'm not a professional like you.

GLENN: Yeah, I know well, I mean, I'm not a you know, I'm not a New York Times best seller

FLYNN: Actually you are. Actually I

GLENN: Whoa!

PAT: Who would have saw that coming.

GLENN: Vince was there the first day that we you remember you were there when we got our first number one.

FLYNN: I've been there for you I'm there when you get thrown out of CNN, I'm there when you get number one, I'm there when you are on the cover of Time magazine.

GLENN: He is there every day, every time he shows up, it's a quintessential Glenn Beck day.

FLYNN: In fact, do you remember in Philadelphia, I was in the studio and you had got the offer to go to New York and you were trying to figure out if you should move or not.

GLENN: I don't remember that.

FLYNN: And I said to you, just don't keep the family out of the blast area, the blast radius.

GLENN: That's right, I remember, I'm sorry.

FLYNN: I said go live in Connecticut or in between.

FLYNN: You are more paranoid than I am.

FLYNN: Well, I know things. It's

GLENN: I know, I know. And so you were there I think when the first time we got a number one New York Times best seller and probably a little coldly, he was on the set and I got the phone call. Do you remember what I said to you?

FLYNN: Yeah. I think you said how many times did it take you to get to number one.

GLENN: What I said to you was, how many years did you work to be a New York Times best seller?

FLYNN: Many, many. See, unlike you, I'm just genuinely happy for your success. I think it's beautiful.

GLENN: Can I tell you something? Your new book, whatever it's called

FLYNN: Arguing With Idiots? No, Pursuit of Honor.

GLENN: Pursuit of Honor is the best Mitch Rapp book that you've written.

FLYNN: Thank you.

GLENN: Has anybody else told you?

FLYNN: I have heard that.

GLENN: You have heard that?

FLYNN: I heard that from some other that guy Joe Soucheray who I was telling you about yesterday.

GLENN: I could have said it's the only Mitch Rapp book that I've actually read and I'm bluffing here on that it's the best ever, but that wouldn't be true.

FLYNN: Well, I think, you know, and I got a little chastised. My 8 year old daughter Ingrid wasn't real thrilled that I got on the air last night that I said your wife had to read you the book, didn't she?

GLENN: Yeah. My wife was sitting next to me when we were watching last night and she just laughed. She hit me. I got hit for it. I don't know why I got hit for it. Stop giving him he is such a nice man. Stop giving him such a hard time.

FLYNN: I love it. You know that this is how machismo guys show their true love for each other. They verbally abuse each other.

GLENN: I know, I know.

FLYNN: Part of the deal.

GLENN: But I mean it. You strangely find it endearing. So, you know, the thing that is in the book and I don't want to give away, you know, anything in the book. You can talk a little. You want to talk a little bit about, you want to talk a little bit about Chapter 50. Will you talk a little bit about Chapter 50 in your book?

FLYNN: I would love to talk about Chapter 50. (Laughing). He's holding up signs now.

FLYNN: No, I just, in my hands I have the Christmas Sweater. What is this? A children's?

GLENN: This is a new children's book. It was just brought in. I just got a copy of it, too. It's a new children's book that we're

FLYNN: It's very nice actually.

GLENN: Thank you.

FLYNN: It's a little thin for my taste but it looks the packaging's beautiful.

GLENN: I'm sorry that 6 year olds don't read 300 page novels. Although somebody sent me a book that is the first chapter book that I read with Raphe last night. It is Knights of Rite or Knights of the Rite. The author sent it to me and I brought it home and I started reading it to my son because he is very into knights and it's the first chapter book. Have you ever read the Goosebumps?

FLYNN: I remember doing that, yeah.

GLENN: It was so thrilling to read with him last night.

FLYNN: Because you tell him, we're going to read one chapter and then they get really fired up about it and then another chapter, come on.

GLENN: But it's the first one, they are like three pages without pictures on them and I mean, it was really cool to do it.

FLYNN: You know what? I don't know if you've read the Harry Potter series.

GLENN: Yeah, I have, yeah.

FLYNN: I love it. And when they're young, that first book is pretty benign. By the time you get to Book 7, it's kind of spooky. So young Raphe wouldn't be ready for that but it wouldn't be the worst thing he's

GLENN: I didn't I read Pursuit of Honor.

FLYNN: To Raphe?

GLENN: To Raphe, yeah. Where they just eviscerate him and just cut him open?

FLYNN: So Chapter 50.

GLENN: Yeah, Chapter 50, this is great.

FLYNN: Enough about you. Can we talk about me for a little bit?

GLENN: Yeah, whatever.

FLYNN: Chapter 50, it dawned on me this past spring when I was working on the book, and it's a take off on the last book where this book starts six days after a series of bombs have torn apart Washington, D.C. And by the way, that scenario that he put forth in Extreme Measures raised a lot of eyebrows in Washington D.C., a lot of people in the law enforcement business were saying this is our worst, this is our week underbelly, there's nothing we can do to protect, you know, against attack like this. And so I played on that with, you know, Nancy Pelosi and Feinstein and boxer and Harry Reid and all these guys and how we are we continue to weaken ourselves by attacking the very men and women who are supposed to protect us. And it dawned on me at one point, and I think we can talk about it without giving too much away. But that every single person that hates the CIA and wants to tear them apart for torture are all people who want to put federal funding towards third term abortions and so there's this great point in the book where they're calling on Rapp, they are calling him a barbarian because he caught a guy who was part of this plot and dislocated his arm repeated by to get him to talk.

GLENN: Which is also got scene.

FLYNN: And so they are calling Rapp a barbarian. And he said, hey, to help me out here, what do you think God is going to find more objectionable? Sticking a spike into the head of an 8 month old fetus and sucking out his brains, or dislocating the arm of a terrorist who wants to kill innocent people?

PAT: What would you give for somebody to say that in congress?

FLYNN: Wouldn't it be great to have an Oliver North moment?

PAT: I would do a fundraiser and award that congressman or senator millions just to bring it up.

GLENN: I would

PAT: Or CIA agent, yeah.

GLENN: I think you know what, Vince? You and I have talked over the last few months really, maybe even the last year that the CIA is and it started under Bush. The CIA started getting thrown under the bus and thrown under the bus. The same guys that we said after 9/11, go get em.

FLYNN: Yep.

GLENN: We now are saying, our politicians on both sides of the aisle are saying, yeah, yeah, yeah, go, go, get the CIA agents that were doing this. These people risked their life, they did do you know, do you know Michael Scheuer?

FLYNN: Yeah, I know who Michael is. Very sharp guy. Don't agree with everything but extremely harp.

GLENN: He is the guy who came up with Rendition.

FLYNN: Yep.

GLENN: Which, rendition is not something that I agree with, I mean, but he came up with it. And, you know, I can't say that we're I mean, it's not like we go dislocate arms of people, you know, together, you know, as friends. So I can't say that I'm his friend because he scares the hell out of me. But I mean, I know him well enough and I'm reading a book on rendition and I read the story of how it came about and it's Michael Scheuer and President Clinton.

FLYNN: Yes.

GLENN: And he's doing it because President Clinton wouldn't let him do the right thing and so President Clinton said, find a loophole for me. Okay, here it is; we'll do it this way. Is that acceptable? Well, now people like Michael Scheuer are under attack. These guys have more honor in their body than... than 100 of these people combined.

FLYNN: Glenn, you go through this on the healthcare debate and everything else. You talk about we have allowed the left on this issue of torture and intelligence to move the debate into their sandbox, and it's a false premise to start with. The CIA was started to go break the laws of other countries and international law. That is their entire mission. Right now somewhere over in

GLENN: Oh, no. No, it's not, no.

FLYNN: Right now.

GLENN: It's not like, hey, go over there and shoot out all the street lamps.

FLYNN: No, no, no.

GLENN: They are doing it for a reason.

FLYNN: But they are doing it for a reason, and the reason is they are conducting espionage. They are stealing right now all around the world we have operatives who are hacking into computer systems, who are breaking into apartments, who are stealing people's information who work for foreign governments. And again back up even further. This, the CIA came about after World War II because you had a at the time it was mostly men, had gone and fought in World War I, survived the Great Depression, World War II, and they saw what unchecked fascism and communism and Naziism could do. They knew how serious it was that they went over there and they lost 360,000 of their fellow countrymen fighting that war and they said, you know, we can't just sit back and be passive about this; we have to go actively protect our interests. So the CIA is founded and their job is to go break our countries' laws and steal their secrets. At times abduct people, interrogate them, do all kinds of nasty things. It worked very well up through the beginning of the Seventies because those survivors of World War II were still in the Senate. And they all understood. The CIA is off limits for politics. Well, church hearings roll in, that all changes, and now it has become this horrible committee, the Senate select committee on intelligence and the House committee where they leak all the time about what's going on, and it's the analogy I have in the book: The frog and the scorpion. These politicians cannot help themselves. They have to run to the nearest camera. Every time they get an opportunity to embarrass the other party. And on this issue of the CIA, the Democrats are it's disgusting what's happened. But there's no bravery on the part of the Republicans. Where are the Republican senators and representatives standing up saying, leave these guys alone?

GLENN: Where is anybody on Afghanistan?

FLYNN: It's a joke.

GLENN: Let me ask you this, Vince. You know enough of these guys, you know special forces, CIA, et cetera, et cetera. Do you really believe that if this country was serious and wanted to use the full force and might of the United States of America and the president said you use all of our resources, you do whatever it takes, you shut that damn area down.

FLYNN: Yep.

GLENN: Kill them.

FLYNN: Yep.

GLENN: Do you think we would still be over in Afghanistan today?

FLYNN: No we would but we would start moving units. You are saying if we had done this years ago?

GLENN: Yeah.

FLYNN: Yeah, I couldn't agree more.

GLENN: We would have been out of there in, what, two years?

FLYNN: Well, there's an issue of infrastructure long term. You know, there's some great books out there about the history of Afghanistan. And when we went in

GLENN: (Snoring).

FLYNN: Oh, here we go. Here we go. When we went in, I was always worried about long term.

GLENN: Uh huh.

FLYNN: By the way, this is the only region that Alexander the Great got defeated. Do you know how he got out of there? He married a thousand of his officers to a thousand other women and he declared peace and moved on.

PAT: What if we did that? Is that something that you are recommending doing?

FLYNN: I am recommending.

GLENN: What if we take all of the progressives that don't have a problem with the Taliban and everything else and want to make friends, we send them over there and they get to marry

PAT: The burka chicks.

GLENN: Or the burka guys, the ones that will make Nancy Pelosi stay in the house. Stay in the house! What if we married them off?

FLYNN: Where is Nancy Pelosi on women's issues in Afghanistan?

GLENN: She doesn't seem to have a problem with that, no. So

FLYNN: The military could do it. And by the way, General McChrystal is a genius. There is no great expert on this subject than him but now we're listening to vice president Joe Biden.

GLENN: Do you know him?

FLYNN: No, but I know he is a fan of the books because some guys at Langley

GLENN: I'm talking about people laying their life on the line

FLYNN: Oh, geez. And you asked me if I know him. You are trying to name drop? Do you know him, do you know him?

GLENN: No, there is a battle going on, but he loves my books. What is that what kind of shameless plug is that?

FLYNN: Oh, I didn't write The Christmas Sweater. So you don't want to move into this area of shameless propaganda and plugs.

GLENN: (Laughing).

FLYNN: He sent me the manuscript. Remember, Kevin? He sent me the manuscript, and I know this was tough for you. He sends it to me, "I want to know what you think of my manuscript." And I read it and I got a little emotional and I said, you know, it's you are going to make a gazillion dollars on it but I don't know how you are ever going to, you know, walk like a man again after writing a book called The Christmas Sweater.

GLENN: He did, he did.

PAT: He didn't walk like a man before. So there was no difference. There was no difference.

GLENN: Yeah.

FLYNN: I came down on Christmas warning and put on my Christmas Sweater.

GLENN: And behind a tree was Mitch Rapp. He ripped the arms of my sister right off, clean off her body! Talk! What's in my present! Talk!

PAT: Why did I start this? I'm so outgunned, it's not even fair.

GLENN: It is the name of the book is

PAT: Pursuit of Honor.

GLENN: Whatever.

PAT: (Laughing).

GLENN: And it's available in bookstores everywhere books every place that books are sold, which wouldn't include hardware stores, and it is worth the read. It is it's fantastic. I finished it this weekend. I didn't know you were coming in this week.

FLYNN: Well, you're a busy man. I couldn't believe I saw you on Fox and Friends this morning. You're everywhere.

GLENN: Well... you weren't on I was surprised you weren't on Fox and Friends.

FLYNN: I came on after you, about an hour later.

GLENN: Jeez. So they let him sleep in. Me... get up, Beck!

The Biden Admin EXPANDED abortion access because they DON'T believe in the Constitution

Joshua Lott / Stringer, JOSEPH PREZIOSO / Contributor | Getty Images

This month has already produced an extreme example of why we need a functional and more conservative Congress in order for America to have a chance at moving forward—because the Left does not believe in the Constitution.

Sure, if you confronted a Democrat in Congress, they would probably claim some sort of allegiance to the Constitution—but as a practical matter, they do not believe in it.

Instead, the Left has put all of their eggs in the basket of the executive branch. Why? Because it has the furthest reach through all the various departments, and it can move the fastest—in short, because it’s the most dictatorial. It only takes a department head to write a new memo, or even better, the President to sign a new executive order to carry the force of law.

The Left has put all of their eggs in the basket of the executive branch.

Do you recall any of the Left’s favorite Supreme Court decisions over the years—something like gay marriage for example—and how Republicans immediately tried to subvert it, using the executive branch to try to nullify the decision? Yeah, that never happened. But that is exactly what Democrats have done in recent weeks to expand abortion access.

Democrats only consider the Supreme Court legitimate when they approve of the decisions. When the miraculous overturning of Roe v. Wade happened last summer, President Biden called it “a realization of an extreme ideology and a tragic error by the Supreme Court.”

Democrats only consider the Supreme Court legitimate when they approve of the decisions.

Recently the FDA approved local pharmacies to issue abortion pills. For the first 20 years after these pills were developed, they were not treated like typical prescription drugs. They had to be dispensed in-person by a doctor. That in-person requirement is now gone.

Keep in mind that the Left’s go-to line is that abortion is always about the health and safety of women, yet a 2021 peer-reviewed study found that chemical abortions have a complication rate four times greater than surgical abortions. Between 2002 and 2015, the rate of abortion-related ER visits following use of the abortion pills increased by 507 percent.

Chemical abortions have a complication rate four times greater than surgical abortions.

And now the Biden administration is making these less-safe abortions much more accessible. Thanks to the FDA’s rule change, Walgreens and CVS have already agreed to dispense abortion pills in states where abortion is legal—effectively turning these stores into new abortion clinics.

As for states that have abortion bans, "Team Biden" announced a new way around those too. Three weeks ago, the Justice Department issued a legal opinion that the U.S. Postal Service is allowed to deliver abortion pills anywhere, even in places where abortion is illegal. What’s their rationale? That the sender cannot know for sure whether the recipient will use the pills illegally or not. So it’s totally okay.

The U.S. Postal Service is allowed to deliver abortion pills anywhere, even in places where abortion is illegal.

Georgetown Law professor Lawrence Gostin told the Washington Post that this Justice Department opinion is “a major expansion of abortion access in the United States.”

So, to recap—the Biden administration has used the FDA, the Justice Department, and the Post Office, which all fall under the executive branch, to provide an end-run around the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson decision.

Expanding abortion was easy—simple policy tweaks and declarations that carry the force of law without an ounce of input from actual lawmakers in Congress—all because it comes from the grotesque, bloated, apparently pro-death executive branch.

Glenn is one of the most outspoken critics of the World Economic Forum and their vision to use crises to reconstruct the world order known as The Great Reset. The recent WEF summit in Davos confirms what Glenn has long warned about: globalist elites seek to upend our democracy, freedoms, and way of life to achieve their utopian climate goals. Here are 15 quotes from the 2023 Davos Summit, revealing their true intentions in their own words:

1. Saving the planet

When you hear the word, "Davos," the first thought that should pop into your mind is an elite group getting together to save the world from imminent climate disaster... at least they think of themselves that way. According to John Kerry:

I mean, it's so almost extraterrestrial to think about saving the planet.

2. Private jets

What most people think when they hear the word "Davos" is a group of global elites flying in on private jets to talk about climate change... and yes, John Kerry does own a private jet, no matter how many times he denies it:

I fly commercial [...] Exclusively.

3. Global Collaboration Village

You always hear some weird, dystopian projects coming out of WEF, like "The Global Collaboration Village," a new metaverse community aimed at strengthening "global cooperation." It sounds like the next installment of Brave New World. According to Klaus Schwab, Founder and President of the WEF:

The Global Collaboration Village is the pioneering effort to use the metaverse for public good, to create global cooperation and to strengthen global cooperation in the metaverse or using metaverse technologies. For me, it's a dream coming true because the village allows the Forum to create a more larger and open platform where everybody can participate.

4. Climate revolution

However, the core theme throughout WEF summits is the immediate need for a climate revolution and how businesses are selfishly blocking the revolution because they want to make an extra buck. Here's how John Kerry summed up the sentiment:

How do we get there? The lesson I have learned in the last years [...] is money, money, money, money, money, money, money.

5. Do or die

This often turns into alarmist language, like having to choose between wealth and our planet's survival... Joyeeta Gupta, Professor of Environment and Development in the Global South at University of Amsterdam, said it eloquently:

If we do the minimum at this pivotable moment in our history, then we and our children – even if we are rich – will live in the danger zone. But if we – business people, governments, citizens, cities – take action today, then we and our children will have a future worth looking forward to.

6. Colossal risks

Potsdam Institute's director Johan Rockström, used similar language, claiming we are "taking colossal risks with the future of civilization":

We are taking colossal risks with the future of civilization on Earth, we are degrading the life support systems that we all depend on, we are actually pushing the entire Earth system to a point of destabilization, pushing Earth outside of the state that has supported civilization since we left the last Ice Age 10,000 years ago.

7. Rain bombs

"Colossal risks" like... rain bombs? We didn't make that up. Ask Al Gore:

That’s what’s boiling the oceans, creating these atmospheric rivers, and the rain bombs.

Courtesy of the World Economic Forum

8. Survival comes down to this

How do we secure our survival? According to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, we have to "end our addiction to fossil fuels." This entails wiping out our entire energy industry, displacing millions of workers, and relying on global governments to usher in a new green industry. In his words:

So, we need to act together to close the emissions gap, and that means to phase out progressively coal and supercharge the renewable revolution, to end the addiction to fossil fuels, and to stop our self-defeating war on nature.

9. Complete transformation

It isn't hyperbolic to argue that the globalist climate goals will completely transform the world economy. Even EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen admitted:

The net-zero transformation is already causing huge industrial, economic and geopolitical shifts – by far the quickest and the most pronounced in our lifetime. It is changing the nature of work and the shape of our industry.

10. Scientific necessity

Of course, to bring about this "net-zero" transformation, we will have to override small, "political expediencies" like democracy to do what is "scientifically necessary." According to Zurich Insurance Group’s head of sustainability risk John Scott:

We’re living in a world right now where what’s scientifically necessary, and what is politically expedient don’t match.

11. Illegal hate speech

Doing away with "political expediencies" would also require the censorship of dissent, which would likely manifest in hate-speech laws. When asked by Brian Stelter how the discussion of disinformation relates to everything else happening today in Davos, European Commission VP Věra Jourová shared this prediction:

Illegal hate speech, which you will have soon also in the U.S. I think that we have a strong reason why we have this in the criminal law.

12. Climate first

We will also have to forego national interests on the international stage. America won't be able to advocate for policies and interests that benefit Americans. Instead, we will sacrifice national interests for the sake of global climate interests. French economy minister Bruno Le Maire said:

The key question is not China First, US First, Europe First. The key question for all of us is Climate First.

13. The role of war

We can also expect globalist leaders to use crises, like the war in Ukraine, to expedite the "net-zero transformation." Chancellor of Germany Olaf Scholz said:

Ultimately, our goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2045 has been given an additional boost by Putin’s war. Now we have even more cause to move away from fossil fuels.

14. Blame game

Globalist leaders will continue to blame ALL of the crises in our society on climate change to justify the "net-zero transition," from the energy shortage to "mistrust, selfishness [and] xenophobia." Prime Minister of Spain Pedro Sanchez said:

Our present struggle is not only against Putin or the energy shortage. It is also against fear, mistrust, selfishness, xenophobia, and environmental disaster. And its outcome will define life in the West and beyond for decades to come.

15. Sacrifice for the greater good

While we sacrifice our national interests for the sake of the "greater global good," we can expect our foreign enemies, like China, to benefit. Suisse Chairman Axel Lehmann said:

The growth forecasts now for China is 4.5%. I would not personally be surprised when that would be topped.

Conclusion

Glenn has been clear about the distinction between wanting to transition to green practices on your own accord and being forced into that transition by globalist, unelected elites. Leaders at Davos will continue to use alarmist language to justify their crackdown on democracy and freedom to bring about their leftist utopia. We have to cut through the alarmist language and in order to protect our freedoms.

Glenn has focused on exposing the dark side of the gender movements waging our culture war, and now, there's a new "trend" emerging as an offshoot to the transgender movement. A growing online community, particularly of men, who consider themselves "involuntarily celibate" or "incels" believe they can live a better life as a trans woman. Why? This community purports the world is rigged against men, particularly against traditionally "unattractive men." What's the solution? Stop being a man...

Incel or "involutarily celibate" communities have existed online in the dark corners of Reddit and Discord for years. The groups are marked by a hatred towards women, blaming them for rigging the world in their favor and denying them of sex. Several members of this growing community have been responsible for large acts of violence, most notably Alek Minassian, who killed 10 and injured 16 after driving a van into a busy area of Toronto in 2021.

However, the transgender movement has presented a new option for incel members: if you can't beat 'em, join 'em... or, in the Transmaxxers' case, "become them."

The online Transmaxxer's Manifesto says, “Since females have the upper hand on the dating market, transitioning from male to female will usually improve your options when it comes to getting sex.” According to the manifesto, transitioning to female not only opens up a different pool of sexual partners, but moreover, you gain access to female-only spaces and are “able to extract resources from males.”

“Since females have the upper hand on the dating market, transitioning from male to female will usually improve your options when it comes to getting sex.”

Another member wrote, "If you do not currently feel like living as a female you might have to work on fixing that ... Identifying as male or being emotionally attached to a male body is bad for you if being male results in you living a bad life.”

This new movement is significant because it is in stark contrast to the mainstream narrative that "transgenderism" is an innate quality. Now, it can be an "option" people choose for social advantage. A moderator going by the alias “Vintologi” on the Transmaxxing Discord server, which boasts over 1,200 members, told The Daily Caller:

Transmaxxing is about transitioning for personal gain rather than focusing on things like "gender identity." ... What matters when it comes to medical transition is whether or not said transition would actually be beneficial, thus the extent to which gender identity is innate does not inform us much regarding when medical transition is appropriate.

One incel member on Reddit lamented that he can't Transmaxx to "have sex with white trans women" and to have "all the benefits of [being] female."

Transmaxxing sheds light on a concerning issue as an increasing number of people, particularly the youth, identify as "transgender." What used to be considered as a "finge case" is now being seen as a social advantage. Glenn recently sat down with de-transitioner Chloe Cole, and the amount of pressure she experienced to become a transgender man AS A TEENAGER was ASTOUNDING. She discussed the new community, friendships, and affirmation she gained when she started her transition journey, and she lost ALL of those social perks when she began de-transitioning. She exchanged affirmation for death-threats, friendships for stone-cold silence.

Transmaxxing is a very specific example of a larger movement that is deeply concerning. Not only is the thansgender ideology problematic on its own merits, but now, we are seeing a rise of a distinction of "social advantage" based on gender affiliation. This is deviating away from the original notion that transgenderism is an innate quality. Now, many consider it more "socially advantageous" to identify as transgender than with your biological gender.

At the same time President Biden's misplaced classified documents were sitting in his house, garage, and office at the Penn Biden Center, a whole lot of Chinese money was flowing around him. Is this just a coincidence, or did the Chinese get anything in return? Investigative journalist John Solomon joins to break down what was going on here ...

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.