Glenn Beck: Christmas Jars


Christmas Jars Reunion

GLENN: The Christmas Jar, came out about five years ago. And I didn't even know Jason at the time. I don't even know, I think I was in a bookstore or somebody sent it to me and I read it, and it was fantastic, just fantastic. I just loved it. It's one of those books that you sit down and you read it cover to cover in one sitting, you know, and your wife is usually going, "Will you get up? We've got stuff to do." Like yeah, yeah, yeah, just hang on just a second. And you finish reading it. And that's where the tradition in my family came from. The Christmas Jars. Jason and I have become friends, and he's here now. Hi, Jason, how are you?

WRIGHT: Thanks for having me. We've done this over the phone so many times, to be here in studio is so cool because I totally expected like padded walls.

GLENN: What is that, like an asylum? Is that how he starts? Wow.

PAT: Did you expect us to be in straitjackets?

WRIGHT: Well, I read the blogosphere. I expected horns and all kinds of stuff.

PAT: Really? Wow.

GLENN: Is this the first time you've been in studio with us?

WRIGHT: In the studio. We've done it over the phone five or six times but never in the studio.

GLENN: Really?

WRIGHT: So yeah. You guys all look so normal here.

GLENN: I'm kind of offended. Are you offended?

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: So we've talked to Jason over the years. I think you called me the first year because didn't somebody call you and say, oh, my gosh, Glenn Beck is talking about your book.

WRIGHT: Yeah, my cousin in Utah called and said, you need to track down Glenn in your market and listen. I was living in Washington D.C. at the time. Unfortunately you were on later in that market at the time, and I picked it up and I listened to you and I said, holy crap, I can't believe that just happened. And I called you the next morning and we got on the air and the rest is history.

GLENN: Well, The Christmas Jars Reunion picks up where The Christmas Jars left off. And you can probably, I'm sure you can buy both of them at the same time. And they really are a one sitting book. They are, what, 200 pages? And you can read it, and it's, you just, it's one of those books that you just, it feels good. I've stopped   no, I can't say that. I have found myself to where I want to stop reading books that are making me feel bad inside. I need more light and goodness inside me because I'm reading so many books that are just depressing that I just, I go to bed now and I'm like, I have   my nightstands are full of books that I'm reading, halfway through or I have to read. And every night I take one off the top that will make me feel good. I'll read others, I'll usually read about three books before I fall asleep. And the last one will always be something like The Christmas Jars reunion that will make me feel good. So can you pick up this book and just read it from here and understand it?

WRIGHT: Absolutely. I think it helps if you've read Christmas Jars first as is the case with most sequels. But you don't have to. You could pick up Christmas Jars Reunion today and you would get the ending.

PAT: You get that?

GLENN: Real quick, bring you up to speed on  you know, bring the audience up to speed on what The Christmas Jars story was and then tell us a little bit about The Christmas Jars Reunion.

WRIGHT: Absolutely. The Christmas Jars Story is very simply based on this very simple tradition of taking an empty, Mason jar or pickle jar or peanut butter jar, it doesn't matter. You wash it out. As you said, you put it on your counter, in your closet, some place in your home where you are going to see it, and you fill it every day with your spare change. You don't need to write a big check, you don't need to fill it with bills. Mom, dad, grandma, grandpa, the kids, the pets, it doesn't matter. Your change goes in the jar. And once it's in the jar, it doesn't come back out again. It's almost sacred once it's in that jar. And we figure over the years, we've sort of run an average just based on the e mail and the phone calls I've gotten from people, and the average family can generate between $100 and $150 pretty easily in spare change over the course of the year. And then as Christmas approaches, maybe either around Christmas Eve  that's what my family does, it sound like that's what the Becks have done and a lot of other families around the family that have contacted me  but it doesn't need to be on Christmas Eve. Drop it on somebody's cubicle when they are not looking at work or put it on the pew next to them when they are not paying attention at church. Whatever works for you. There is no right way or wrong way to give it away. And because my family experimented with this and had such a wonderful experience that first year, I thought, I've got to try to find a way to fictionalize this and see if we can inspire one family to do this, to sort of try this experiment. And I thought, if one family can do it and have as good an experience as we had, then it would be completely worth the effort of writing this little book and getting rejected by over 20 agents and publishers and finally finding a home for it. And who could have predicted back then that the book would now be half a million copies sold and a movement launched. And I have to say there are two people most responsible for The Christmas Jars book and now movement across the country.

My editor at Shadow Mountain, Chris Schoebinger who discovered the manuscript in this lost pile where it's tough to get discovered and a guy named Glenn Beck who you told me originally you found the book because you were going home for the weekend and you looked for the thinnest book on your stack on your desk and you said, I don't have a lot of time; I've got a short attention span, man, so I've got to find a thin book. You took it home, you read it, you came in Monday morning, you went crazy about it. And the movement   and this has become bigger than the book. I want your listeners to know that. This isn't just about a book anymore. This is a true movement of people all across the world now participating in the tradition, and we have you and my great publisher to thank in large part.

GLENN: Well, I will tell you that we have to find a way to teach our children that it is about giving, not receiving. That we have to teach our children, you know, that   you know, and that's kind of what my Chris pass book is doing with the kids. The kids' version of the Sweater is. You don't always get what you receive because there are parents out there, I remember that year when I couldn't afford anything. And there are parents out there that are struggling so hard. And this is the season where if you have self doubt and you don't know what's important in your life and you have struggled financially, you're struggling financially, this is the time where as a parent you just want to hang yourself because you are   this society has made this season into something that it is not that you feel like a complete and total failure. And we've got to change that. And anything we can do to help change that or help these people out that are feeling that way, you know   I bet you everybody in this audience, if you are not feeling it this year, you have felt it in the past. And that's what The Christmas Jars and the whole idea behind it, that's what it does. And this is a great   you could sit down with   I gave it to my daughters because they were old enough. This is a great book to be able to share with the whole family. Now, the Reunion picks it up, and the characters, who's involved in this one?

WRIGHT: It's essentially the same cast of characters, Hope Jensen, the main character from the first book, Christmas Jars Reunion picks up two years later, and I just have to say the book is really in large part a thank you to the thousands and thousands of people out there that have gotten involved in the tradition, have e mailed me and have said, please tell us what comes next for this character. And I never expected that. I didn't expect the first book to be published let alone the sequel to ever come along. So Christmas Jars Reunion is a thank you to those folks and it's an opportunity for me to finish Hope's story.

GLENN: But Hope actually goes awry in this one.

WRIGHT: She does. She loses sight of the fact that the tradition is ultimately about one jar, and Hope becomes very involved in this big number. She wants to place 1,001 jars in homes. She wants to give away 1,001 jars full of money. She has a tote board, a tally road in the restaurant where this Christmas Jars ministry is sort of taking place. She becomes obsessed by this, almost sort of turned it into this kind of a corporate culture, and she loses sight that it is ultimately about one jar, one birth and one savior. It's wonderful if a school or a corporation or a church wants to get together and give away a lot of jars collectively. But ultimately what matters most is the one family that's going to get your jar or Stu's jar or Pat's jar. That's what matters.

GLENN: Right.

WRIGHT: The one family when they open that door and see that jar, that's what matters most.

GLENN: This is right in the same message that I have been trying to say for the last year or so that "Too big to fail" means nothing. It is the wrong direction. And they are going to continue in Washington and everywhere else to try to make these things, push these problems bigger, bigger, bigger. When the answer is smaller, smaller, smaller. The answer is you, the individual. It doesn't even matter about the family you're giving the jar to. It matters about you giving the jar, you understanding that you are so blessed and you can give to somebody else. The Christmas Jars reunion by Jason Wright available in bookstores everywhere this holiday season. This is one of these books that you need to pick up. And you'll just love it. It will make a great Christmas Gift for somebody. It will make a great Christmas Gift for you, your family. You can read it during the holiday season and start a new Christmas tradition with The Christmas Jars. And now the new book, Christmas Jars Reunion by Jason Wright. Available everywhere. Jason, thank you very much.

WRIGHT: Thank you, sir.

Here's a question unique to our times: "Should I tell my father 'Happy Father's Day,' even though he (she?) is now one of my mothers?"

Father's Day was four days ago, yes, but this story is just weird enough to report on. One enjoyable line to read was this gem from Hollywood Gossip: "Cait is a woman and a transgender icon, but she is also and will always be the father of her six children."

RELATED: If Bruce was never a he and always a she, who won the men's Olympic gold in 1976?

Imagine reading that to someone ten — even five — years ago. And, honestly, there's something nice about it. But the strangeness of its having ever been written overpowers any emotional impact it might bring.

"So lucky to have you," wrote Kylie Jenner, in the Instagram caption under pre-transition pictures of Bruce Jenner.

Look. I risk sounding like a tabloid by mere dint of having even mentioned this story, but the important element is the cultural sway that's occurring. The original story was that a band of disgruntled Twitter users got outraged about the supposed "transphobic" remarks by Jenner's daughter.

But, what we should be saying is, "who the hell cares?" Who cares what one Jenner says to another — and more importantly and on a far deeper level — who cares what some anonymous Twitter user has to say?

When are we going to stop playing into the hands of the Twitter mob?

When are we going to stop playing into the hands of the Twitter mob? Because, at the moment, they've got it pretty good. They have a nifty relationship with the mainstream media: One or two Twitter users get outraged by any given thing — in this case Jenner and supposed transphobia. In return, the mainstream media use the Twitter comment as a source.

Then, a larger Twitter audience points to the article itself as proof that there's some kind of systemic justice at play. It's a closed-market currency, where the negative feedback loop of proof and evidence is composed of faulty accusations. Isn't it a hell of a time to be alive?

These days, when Americans decide to be outraged about something, we really go all out.

This week's outrage is, of course, the Trump administration's "zero tolerance" policy toward illegal immigration along the southern border. Specifically, people are upset over the part of the policy that separates children from their parents when the parents get arrested.

RELATED: Where were Rachel Maddow's tears for immigrant children in 2014?

Lost in all the outrage is that the President is being proactive about border security and is simply enforcing the law. Yes, we need to figure out a less clumsy, more compassionate way of enforcing the law, but children are not being flung into dungeons and fed maggots as the media would have you believe.

But having calm, reasonable debates about these things isn't the way it's done anymore. You have to make strong, sweeping announcements so the world knows how righteous your indignation is.

That's why yesterday, the governors of Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island and Connecticut declared they are withholding or recalling their National Guard troops from the U.S.-Mexico border until this policy of separating children from their parents is rescinded.

Adding to the media stunt nature of this entire "crisis," it turns out this defiant announcement from these five governors is mostly symbolic. Because two months ago, when President Trump called for 4,000 additional National Guard troops to help patrol the border, large numbers of troops were not requested from those five states. In fact, no troops were requested at all from Rhode Island. But that didn't stop Rhode Island's Democratic governor, Gina Raimondo, from announcing she would refuse to send troops if she were asked. She called the family separation policy, "immoral, unjust and un-American."

There's so much outrage, we're running short on adjectives.

The governors of Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New York all used the word "inhumane" in their statements condemning the Trump administration policy. There's so much outrage, we're running short on adjectives.

In a totally unrelated coincidence, four of these five governors are running for re-election this year.

I've made my position clear — separating these children from their parents is a bad policy and we need to stop. We need to treat these immigrants with the kind of compassion we'd want for our own children. And I said the same thing in 2014 when no one cared about the border crisis.

If consistency could replace even just a sliver of the outrage in America, we would all be a lot better off.

I think we can all agree, both on the Left and the Right, that children who have been caught up in illegal immigration is an awful situation. But apparently what no one can agree on is when it matters to them. This past weekend, it suddenly — and even a little magically — began to matter to the Left. Seemingly out of nowhere, they all collectively realized this was a problem and all rushed to blame the Trump administration.

RELATED: These 3 things need to happen before we can fix our border problem

Here's Rachel Maddow yesterday:

I seem to remember getting mocked by the Left for showing emotion on TV, but I'll give her a pass here. This is an emotional situation. But this is what I can't give her a pass on: where the heck was this outrage and emotion back in 2014? Because the same situation going on today — that stuff Maddow and the rest of the Left have only just now woken up to — was going on back in July 2014! And it was arguably worse back then.

I practically begged and pleaded for people to wake up to what was going on. We had to shed light on how our immigration system was being manipulated by people breaking our laws, and they were using kids as pawns to get it done. But unlike the gusto the Left is using now to report this story, let's take a look at what Rachel Maddow thought was more important back in 2014.

On July 1, 2014, Maddow opened her show with a riveting monologue on how President Obama was hosting a World Cup viewing party. That's hard-hitting stuff right there.

On July 2, 2014, Maddow actually acknowledged kids were at the border, but she referenced Health and Human Services only briefly and completely rushed through what was actually happening to these kids. She made a vague statement about a "policy" stating where kids were being taken after their arrival. She also blamed Congress for not acting.

See any difference in reporting there from today? That "policy" she referenced has suddenly become Trump's "new" policy, and it isn't Congress's fault… it's all on the President.

She goes on throughout the week.

On July 7, 2014, her top story was something on the Koch brothers. Immigration was only briefly mentioned at the end of the show. This trend continued all the way through the week. I went to the border on July 19. Did she cover it? Nope. In fact, she didn't mention kids at the border for the rest of the month. NOT AT ALL.

Do you care about immigrant kids who have been caught in the middle of a broken immigration system or not?

Make up your minds. Is this an important issue or not? Do you care about immigrant kids who have been caught in the middle of a broken immigration system or not? Do you even care to fix it, or is this what it looks like — just another phony, addicted-to-outrage political stunt?

UPDATE: Here's how this discussion went on radio. Watch the video below.

Glenn gives Rachel Maddow the benefit of the doubt

Rachel Maddow broke down in tears live on her MSNBC show over border crisis.

Progressives think the Obamas are a gift to the world. But their gift is apparently more of the metaphorical kind. It doesn't extend to helpful, tangible things like saving taxpayers money. Illinois has approved $224 million to pay for street and transportation upgrades around the planned site of the Obama Presidential Center. The catch is that Illinois taxpayers will have to cover $200 million of that cost. For a presidential museum.

Eight years of multiplying the national debt wasn't enough for Barack Obama. Old fleecing habits die hard. What's another $200 million here and there, especially for something as important as an Obama tribute center?

RELATED: Want to cure millennials' financial woes? Reform the payroll tax.

That's all well and good except Illinois can't even fund its pension system. The state has a $137 billion funding shortfall. That means every person in Illinois owes $11,000 for pensions, and there is no plan to fix the mess. Unless Illinois progressives have discovered a new kind of math, this doesn't really add up. You can't fund pensions, but you're going to figure out a way to milk the public for another $200 million to help cover the cost of a library?

It's hard to imagine who in their right mind would think this will be money well spent. Well, except for maybe Chicago Mayor and former Obama Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel who said, "The state's… investment in infrastructure improvements near the Obama Center on the South Side of Chicago is money well spent."

Some presidential overreach lasts longer than others.

The spending has already been signed into law, even though the Obama library has not received construction approval yet. Part of the holdup is that the proposed site is on public land in historic Jackson Park. That doesn't seem very progressive of the Obamas, but, you know, for certain presidents, you go above and beyond. It's just what you do. Some presidential overreach lasts longer than others.

Here's the thing about taxing the peasants so the king can build a fancy monument to himself – it's wrong. And completely unnecessary. The Obamas have the richest friends on the planet who could fund this project in their sleep. If the world simply must have a tricked-out Obama museum, then let private citizens take out their wallets voluntarily.

As the Mercury Museum proved this weekend, it is possible to build an exhibit with amazing artifacts that attracts a ton of visitors – and it cost taxpayers approximately zero dollars.