Mary Matalin Interview

GLENN: What do you think about Mike Huckabee?

MATALIN: I think he is a perfectly lovely person and I think he's the best debater and the best order in the bunch but he is not a conservative. And just because you're a Christian, which he clearly is, does not mean you are a conservative. He's Christian left. I know a lot of Christian left people. My husband's Christian left. He's the same as Catholic and that is a different cut. The mainstream media has equated Christianity with issue sets that are conservative. He is not. Expanded government, he raised taxes, he's soft on immigration. He's just, he's not a conservative. That doesn't make him a bad guy. It just makes him not a guy that I think represents what the Republican party is. And we know what the Republican party loses by and that's how he ran his stake. We lost in '06 because we expanded government and, you know, we weren't serious about getting -- you know what I mean? So he's everything that proves, shows how we lost. Why would we nominate him? Although that he can tell a good joke. Well, turn on Jay Leno. They are all writing their own stuff now.

Mary Matalin, visit her website here...

GLENN: He's an amazing guy because I like Mike. He's a nice guy. There are some things that are unsettling with me on Mike Huckabee, but the thing that -- I don't think he's necessarily left. Politically speaking I don't think he looks at politics and says, yeah, I'm from the left. I think he really believes he's from the right but his Christianity, the understanding of the gospel, the way he understands it, the way he interprets it is that we have to help our fellow man, and we do. But Jesus never said government needs to help the fellow man. He gets so lost in his Christianity that sometimes people -- and I see this happen all the time. People get so lost in their Christianity that they forget that Jesus was saying, you go help that other person. And he never said --

MATALIN: You go give that other person your coat and we teach a man to fish. We don't give him fish. We teach him to fish.

GLENN: Exactly right.

MATALIN: So that is -- and yeah, you have hit the nail on the head because I appreciate his compassion and I appreciate that happening through the culture helping others, which was the essence of Bush's compassionate conservativism. Let the faith-based community, let's inspire them and let's inspire people to do all of that. But as you -- oh, my God, I almost feel like it's cliche, we've been saying it for so long. That if you give people -- if the government does it for them, they don't learn how to do it. You are not helping anybody in the end. You are not helping them, you are not helping culture, you are not helping families. We proved that over and over and over again. And what it just -- I know it's not left. You are absolutely right about this. But it so smacks of, you know, good intentions, you don't have to have a good outcome. You just have to have a good intention. And if we want to help people, then that makes us good. No, you get -- when you're governing, you've got to put together policies that do help people which largely through our history have been premised in getting out of their way and it's fostering freedom and entrepreneurship and risk-taking and personal responsibility, protecting private property, insuring the rule of laws. Those are the principles that made this country great, not some nanny statism. We've gone backwards every time we've done that

GLENN: Probably -- speaking of nanny statism, did you see that Bloomberg is, I mean, he is really serious about running for President of the United States. He's actually -- he's beginning to pursue, well, maybe I should run for President of the United States. Who do you think he hurts? You want to talk about nanny state, it's Bloomberg.

MATALIN: Right. He can't -- he's saying all that and he's keeping his options open but he can -- what they are also really saying and what they know, and he's not going to throw his money away, is he can't -- there's no hold for him. There's no rational, whatever we call it anymore, for him to get in unless the two nominees are not satisfactory or they are -- like if it was a Huckabee and a Hillary, he could get in, for instance. If it was a Fred and Obama, there's no room for him because they sort of cover the waterfront of the left and the right or whatever, you know what I mean? But if he -- and his original message was confidence. Well, people -- politics move fast, okay? We're post Katrina now and a lot of people have really come to understand that Katrina wasn't federal incompetence solely, it had a lot to do with the state incompetence or not the government at all, people themselves. But the competent thing is being deflated, that rationale, because people are largely getting increasingly satisfied with the field. So he's losing the rationale. But if he does get in, to answer your question, he is a Manhattan social, proud social liberal. Competent but somewhat of a nanny stator. And, you know, who would that hurt? Not us because that's not what we're about.

GLENN: You look at -- I mean, I personally think if I were on the other side, and I think this is why the media has hammered Romney on his religion but has not said a darn thing about the religious statements of Mike Huckabee. If I were on the other side, I think I would say I want Huckabee to win because I think he would be the most easily marginalized candidate for the left to be able to marginalize the right. How do you feel about Obama? Who do you -- I want Hillary to win because I'm a conservative because I think she's the most -- she's got the most hate on her. Who do you look at and say, gosh, if they're going to elect somebody besides Mike Gravel?

MATALIN: Let me agree with you and augment that so the two of us together, the sum of our parts is greater than our whole here.

GLENN: Now Mary Matalin is talking about my parts. I mean, this is disturbing.

MATALIN: I love men who go right to the entendre.

GLENN: Sure.

MATALIN: They are wrong about Huckabee, the mainstream press and Romney. I love this. The mainstream media is a cult, not Mormonism, and I really appreciate what you've been saying about his faith. And they are wrong about being marginalized because of his faith. What he could be marginalized for and should be is his zero lack of security experience or knowledge or feel-for in the world at war and that you and I know the number one problem, that will marginalize him. I want to run against Hillary, they are all full of hate. Hate, hate, hate, change and hate. There are people who are done hating Bush and they will go hate something else because she is a liberal. To them they think we use it as a cussword but it's a classic -- it will be a classic confrontation between the liberal philosophy of big government, higher taxes, all the rest of it and hopefully we will resume to being conservative as opposed to, you know, we're kind of trying to be moderate and walk down the middle of the road here which is where you get run over. So I like her because it sets up a classic confrontation and he will be marginalized not for anything other than his lack of foreign policy experience in a tumultuous time.

GLENN: Mary Matalin, best of luck to you.

MATALIN: Yeah, get better. Get your own Whoopi cushion.

GLENN: Love you more than life itself.

MATALIN: Love you, bye-bye.

GLENN: Mary Matalin, I don't know how she does it, how she eats breakfast with that man every day, but she does.

On Monday's radio program, Glenn Beck and Stu Burguiere were joined by Pat Gray to discuss "woke" Olympic athletes.

In this clip, the guys discussed how "bravely" some athletes are for threatening to protest the national anthem, for twerking on stage, and for showing off how woke they are.

Glenn reminded America of actual bravery at the Olympics when Jesse Owens won the gold medal at the Berlin Olympics. "He [Owens] was oppressed," Glenn said.

Watch the clip to hear Glenn tell the full story. Can't watch? Download the podcast here.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Political commentator Bill O'Reilly joined the Glenn Beck radio program on Friday made an important prediction about President Joe Biden's chance of reelection in 2024.

O'Reilly told Glenn that former President Donald Trump was brought down because of COVID. "if COVID had not appeared, O'Reilly stated, "he [Trump] would have won reelection."

O'Reilly went on to predict that like Trump, President Joe Biden would lose reelection because of COVID. People saw a president who could not put out an intelligent fact-based message about COVID and people will remember that," he explained.

O'Reilly later added that "Trump and Biden are one-termers because of COVID."

Watch the video below to catch more of the conversation:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Critical race theory: Marxism is a religion

Uttam Sheth/Flickr

Marx didn't actually tell his followers that the system needed to be destroyed. And it's not what Marx actually believed. Very few Marxists actually understand what Marx laid out.

Marxism isn't a list of demands and instructions. It's Marx's attempt to tell the future. Some of it he got right, most he got wrong. For example, he predicted the rise of automation.

Believe it or not, Marx was not an anti-capitalist. If anything, he revered it.

In a letter to Engels, he complained that too many people misunderstood his message, that his plan is to merge with capitalism. To make it new. He wanted to reify his brand of socialism, reify is a Marxist term, actually. It basically means to make an abstract idea concrete.

Marx didn't hate capitalism. He actually thought it was necessary. And he knew communism would never happen without the aid of capitalism.

Marx didn't hate capitalism. He actually thought it was necessary.

From there, he takes these ideas to some weird conclusions. Horrible conclusions. The main one being revolution.

What does the first phase of the Marxist revolution look like? How will we know if it has started? How can we tell if it's already begun? Marx's idea of the "dictatorship of the proletariat," where the working class would rise up in revolution and earn their freedom.

But what did Marx mean by freedom? Like so much of Marxism, it involves giving up your individuality, in service to the collective: "Only in community with others does each individual have the means of cultivating his gifts in all directions; only in the community, therefore, is personal freedom possible."

That's from his book The German Ideology, which he co-wrote with Friedrich Engels, the guy who paid all of his bills: "Free competition, which is based on the idea of individual freedom, simply amounts to the relation of capital to itself as another capital."

His idea here is that capital ruins any idea of freedom or individuality. And competition is what he uses as proof. In other words, Marx's definition of freedom has nothing to do with actual freedom, freedom as we know it.

He wrote, in Capital: "It is not individuals who are set free by free competition; it is, rather, capital which is set free."

He's saying that Capital manipulates our individual freedom and forces us to exploit ourselves. For someone who didn't believe in God, he sure had some fanciful ideas about the forces that control the universe.

For someone who didn't believe in God, he sure had some fanciful ideas about the forces that control the universe.

Marxists have always argued that capitalism is a religion. That our debt to capital is no different than our debt to God. Critical Theorist Walter Benjamin wrote an entire book called Capitalism as Religion, and wrote that capitalism is "the first case of a cult that creates guilt, not atonement."

There were many strains of socialism before Marx. There were entire movements, named after socialist and anarchist philosophers. But Marx was the one who figured it out, with the help of a rotating cast of people paying for his sloth, of course.

Marx's influence on socialism was so profound that socialism was practically re-named in honor of Marx. Marx has been deified.

He created a utopian society. Very hypothetical. It requires a working class that is devoted to daily readings of The Communist Manifesto.

This assumes that people who work all day — at a real job, where they can't just sit on the couch all day as Marx did — even have the energy to read dense theory when they get home.

Marx made a religion.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.

The Capitol riot was foolish and tragic, but Pelosi's Select Committee "investigation" on the January 6 "insurrection" has devolved into a show trial complete with bad tears and bad acting. But this is just a charade designed to distract us.

What's going on behind closed doors is truly nefarious. The Biden White House and the U.S. national security apparatus are seizing that event to redefine domestic terrorism and expand the powers of government to prevent it. There is an alarming blueprint for sweeping government action called the "National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism," put together by the National Security Council.

On his Wednesday night special this week, Glenn Beck exposes the collusion between the Biden administration and Big Tech to surveil, root out, and silence America's deplorables – all in the name of national security.

Watch the full "Glenn TV" episode below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.