Glenn interviews David Barton



A clip from the Insider Extreme. Learn more...

GLENN: I brought David Barton in from Wall Builders because I really, truly believe that David Barton is he's a guy who I really think has been put in a in his place, in his position for a reason and, you know, David, everybody has a time and I have a feeling your time is coming. I don't know what your role is. I don't know what you're going to be doing, but my gut tells me you are one of the most important men in America for this message today.

Do you feel that at all? Not the self aggrandizement stuff but do you feel that something's coming?

BARTON: Yes. Something is definitely coming and the type of message I carry is really an old message. I mean, it's a 2, 3, 400 year old message in America and this is the right time for it.

GLENN: Okay. So, I wanted to tomorrow we're going to introduce the audience to Samuel Adams for an hour on television and he's an amazing man. When you learn about Samuel Adams, you'll be, like, my gosh, what? I mean, you learn stuff about the Massachusetts Constitution, separation of church and state. No, no, no, no, no, no. Federal, Federal, they said, we can't do anything Federal, but in states? My gosh. You read the State Constitution of Massachusetts and you would have no idea that this was the way things were. Correct?

BARTON: That's exactly right. And that State Constitution in Massachusetts, interestingly enough, is the only Constitution in the world that has been in active operation longer than the U.S. Constitution.

GLENN: Give me a give me a couple of lines from it, if I can put you on the spot.

BARTON: Well, there's several great lines in it. There's two things with the Constitution. First is John Adams came out with a letter to tell the people of Massachusetts, here's what we're about to do and the letter that accompanied the Massachusetts Constitution of 1780 and it says we can't do this without God, we rely on him, and it goes through a bunch of what they call evangelical principles of piety religion. So, that was their term. Then as you get through the Constitution, they start off by saying because these are so important for government, we authorize any of the of localities across the state that pay for religious teachers it doesn't matter what denomination, you choose your denomination

GLENN: This is Barnie Franks' state.

BARTON: Oh, yeah. And this is the position they chose to ignore when they started all this four or five years ago, but this Constitution is still in place and they talk even about how they fund Harvard because it is an institution of Christian (for Massachusetts and.

GLENN: Unbelievable

BARTON: It's an amazing document. It is. It's amazing.

GLENN: Okay. I wanted to have you on because I am and I don't even know where this goes from here. I really don't. But I feel like we are at a time where America better learn about George Whitfield and others like him

BARTON: Yeah, yeah.

GLENN: I didn't know (this part of American history until rather recently. 1740, George Whitfield comes to America and he is looking at people's wedge wood China and he says, (my gosh, these people are wore shopping the golden calf


BARTON: Yes.

GLENN: And we were in a place, like where we were even three years ago, where God didn't nothing mattered and it's just about, you know, enriching yourself and greed and everything else and America was a very different place. It was going into a dark period and then there was a revival, mainly because of him and where did that lead? What did he do and where did that lead?

BARTON: What he did was he carried a message across America that really turned people back to their spiritual roots. That was how America was founded. They had forgotten that. They were so prosperous at that point in time. They had forgotten what made them prosperous and so they were worshipping the prosperity rather than the cause of the prosperity which had been their religious faith. So, he takes them back to their faith. It was really radical at the time because he transcended all the lines, all the barriers. He did things that have never before been done. He was heartily criticized by religious leaders but he wanted people back to

GLENN: Hang on. You said heartily.

BARTON: Heartily.

GLENN: Not hardly

BARTON: No. Heartily. That's right.

GLENN: And he was a guy who and it's amazing when I read this, he was a guy who tried to bring everybody together

BARTON: Yeah.

GLENN: And said forget your denominations. Let's go back to the root and he was really focused on Moses. And let's go back to the root of where we of where we were and who we are and this land is the land of milk and honey and when he started to do, because he didn't have a church, if you will, he didn't I mean, he was going around and giving sermons in the open air, sometimes up to 30,000

BARTON: 30,000. That's right.

GLENN: How did people even hear him?

BARTON: That's Franklin has a great piece in this because Franklin was a sign test and he (saw the 30,000 crowd. He said he started backing away from whit field to see how far away he could get and still hear him and once he calculated that radius, he then calculated, okay, how many people could fit in this arc and he said 100,000 people could have easily heard whit field without any amp MRI if I indication.

GLENN: I tell you, that is I have a booming voice. I know how to project. I have project in 3, 4, 5,000 seat theaters, but those theaters are made to amplify your voice

BARTON: That's right. That's right.

GLENN: Not outside. I don't even know how that happened.

BARTON: Well, Franklin said to that point in time he had always gathered the accounts of the classics that Roman generals would get their Army around them and talk to them, 30, 40,000 soldiers. He said, after hearing Whitfield, he knew that that, of the of Romans was actually accurate.

GLENN: And when he was doing this, in an account I just read this weekend I love this he had to pay for all of this himself.

BARTON: He did

GLENN: And he was selling he was selling copies of his sermons, but he also sold what do they call it? I can't remember what they called it now, but it was, like what came to mind was, like, T shirts.

BARTON: Right.

GLENN: Like a concert. What was he selling?

BARTON: Well, he was self funded and it's free entire prize.

GLENN: Oh, I know.

BARTON: And the cool thing is, the relationship the first time religious leaders and it's because it is a scriptural concept. So, if you take the scripture away from free enterprise, now you go greed and corruption, you get business going in a bad direction and if you separate the spiritual side and the character size of free enterprise, then you get this

GLENN: That we're in now.

BARTON: That's exactly right. You take the religious character out of business, now you're back to Europe and that's what they were fighting.

GLENN: So, now you just get it so much. I want to take a break and when we come back, I want to lay out a little bit of the black robe brigade, what it was and there's no organization here, there's no and there wasn't back in the revolution, but they played a huge role and I think we just have to teach people what this is and then let the spirit dictate what they do with it, but a piece of history that you've never heard before, most likely, and the role it played and is there a place for it today? Back in a second.

(Out at 10:47 a.m.)

GLENN: David Barton from Wall Builders is with me. He is he's a guy who has the largest private collection of documents and letters and papers from the founding of our country, pre 1812, 1820? 1812

BARTON: Uh huh.

GLENN: The largest collection in private hands in the world. I think you're only real rivaled really by Library of Congress, aren't you?

BARTON: Well, that's not rivaled. They are so far out in front.

GLENN: Yeah. I know. So, David, we were talking about the way to the way our founders set our country

BARTON: Yeah.

GLENN: Was the people starting in 1740 had a revival and they, they changed as a people and it was really led by the pastors and the preachers and everybody else. The black robe brigade, as we talked about last night, in a nutshell was a pastors just choosing to teach people correct principles

BARTON: That's right.

GLENN: It's not happening in America anymore par bar no.

GLENN: Tell me the difference. What do pastors, priests, preachers, rabbis, everything, not policy liquors, because I would walk out of a church that is telling me how to vote, what do they need to be teaching and focus on?

BARTON: Well, this is where it's really fun to go back with those old documents because we have thousands and thousands of those pages of sermons that shaped the American revolution. One was a great sermon on taxes from 1766 after the stamp act. The stamp act came down. Charles /TALTS tee said, okay, what does the Bible say about taxes? Because here's what scripture says about tax policy. They did the same thing on governments. They did the same thing on military.

GLENN: Do you have do you have online access to any of this?

BARTON: Yes. We have a lot of these posted online. We have a lot of their sermons up, but the difference is they would talk about anything that was in the newspaper, they would comment from a scriptural perspective. So, I have sermons (of theirs on (earthquakes and fires and floods and railroads, you name it. See, today what's happened, the IRS has really kind of squeezed pastors into a little bitty (the government deals with and, as a matter of fact, one of the national guys I know really well has a team of attorneys and they're told by IRS that they can't even talk about something that might become a political issue. How do you know what is might going to become? And so now you've got the government telling the people what they can and can't say from the pulpit? Give me a break.

GLENN: What is your web site?

BARTON: Wallbuilders.com, sermons up.

GLENN: America, I just wanted you to think about this. I want you to talk to your spiritual leaders, if you're a spiritual leaders, I want you to think about it. David and I are going to start working together on a few things that, you know, maybe we can, through BECK UNIVERSITY or through the America revival or whatever, we're going to start teaching some of these things and making this stuff available because this is the key, this is truly the key. By the way, the America Revival, where David Barton teaches the first hour of it and it is phenomenal, it's a I think it's a seven hour program. It's phenomenal. We have added another city. We're going to announce that coming up at the top of the hour. It will go on sale but it's one of the of last stops of the America Revival. We'll give that to you in just a second. And we'll see you tomorrow for founders Fridays, David Barton.

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, a transgender activist called for a "Supreme Court Assassination Challenge" on Twitter, according to screenshots captured of the now-deleted tweet.

Activist Eli Erlick, a founding member of Trans Student Educational Resources (TSER) and creator of the controversial "gender identity" teaching tool for children called the "Gender Unicorn," tweeted and later deleted the disturbing remark on Friday, according to the Washington Free Beacon.

Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) also caught a screenshot of the tweet before it was deleted.

"The unhinged radical left is calling for the assassination of our Supreme Court Justices. That's not the way to disagree with a decision in America. It is unacceptable, and Biden’s DOJ must immediately act," Blackburn responded on Twitter.

Erlich then tried to play off her call to assassinate Supreme Court justices as a hilarious joke only Gen Z and Millennials would understand, apparently not understanding the seriousness of the attempted assassination of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh just three weeks ago.

Erlick isn't the only Left-winger to make incendiary calls since the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision. Here are just a few examples:

  • Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) called on people to “defy" the Supreme Court.
  • Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) called for people to get “into the streets” alongside radical communist leader who wants to 'overthrow' the American system.
  • Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot (D) yelled "F*** Clarence Thomas" on a public stage for all to see and hear.
  • House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) suggested that Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh lied to Congress.
  • And of course, "TheView" host Whoopi Goldberg issued a disgusting racist threat toward Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
Filling in for Glenn Beck on the radio program, BlazeTV hosts Pat Gray and Stu Burguiere took a look at these and other stunning examples of leftist lunacy over the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Watch the video clip below. Can't watch? Download the podcast here.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Many members of the far-left already are calling for a ‘Night of Rage’ after the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, and the White House has been discussing plans to defy the ruling too. In fact, one idea floated by Biden Administration officials, according to the New York Times, includes providing abortions on military bases. So, will America experience another summer of riots? Are YOUR taxpayer dollars at risk? And what does this mean for deep-blue states? Josh Hammer, legal expert and opinion editor for Newsweek, joins Glenn to discuss what may come next...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Josh Hammer, he's the opinion editor of Newsweek. He's the host of the Josh Hammer show. He is really quite brilliant. One of the leading minds in the conservative movement, I think. Josh Hammer joins us now.

To tell us, what did you find in this decision?

JOSH: Glenn, great to be back with you, on such a momentous, and really such an emotional day, honestly. So, you know, look, as you said, this dropped recently. Funny enough, I was in the middle of getting a guest lecture from an organization on the advisory board as to when it drops. So I barely had any time to kind of skim through, let alone guess the concerning dissenting opinions. But it looks like this looks very similar, to the draft opinion that was leaked, by the Politico story, a month and a half ago, in early May. And I think those of us who were praying that the five justices from this leaked draft opinion, would have the fortitude to stiffen their spines against this unprecedented assault. Now knows that our prayers were answered, Glenn. That's really my takeaway right now.

This looks a lot like the leaked opinion. Justice Thomas and Justice Kavanaugh have some reconcurring opinions.

But unbelievable. And really just holding aside the constitutional law stuff for a second hear. Just speaking as pro-lifers, on a day like today, I think we really just need to pause. And I tweeted this out earlier. We need to just be grateful for our half century of pro-life activist forbearers. You know, this -- Glenn, this issue could have gone away after 1973. That was a long time ago. 1973. I mean, this issue could have just gone away. We owe a tremendous debt of gratitude to the pro-life moral activist. Political activist. And, of course, yes. Legal activist. Who fought day in and day out, that makes sure this great injustice stayed front and center of our national, political conscience. And in many days, the culmination of a half century of fighting for truth and justice. But in many ways, it's also a new beginning for the pro-life fight as well, interestingly.

STU: How do you mean a new beginning for the fight? I just it's going to turn, I think we're going to see abortion turn even darker in those states that allow it. Is that -- is that what you're meaning by this?

JOSH: Well, look, for a half century now, Roe vs. Wade, and its project any, specifically, the Planned Parenthood versus Casey case of 1992.

They took away from the states obviously. They arrogated authority away from the states, the ability to attempt to nationally codify one view of the morality of abortion.

It happened to be a profoundly immoral view. So these -- the fight now shifts to the states. And the pro-life activists. And all the 50 states. Especially, obviously in red states. Purple states. I mean, admittedly some blue states like New York and California, probably won't be able to touch them there.

But we have to make sure that our side is well positioned in the state Capitols for every red, purplish, probably even light blue state, to make sure we fight for successful, cogent, and morally consistent pro-life legislation. The state of Oklahoma, actually, just north of Texas. Right where you are now, Glenn. They have been leading on this actually. Governor Kevin Stitt signed into law, a fantastic pro-life bill there in Oklahoma. A few weeks ago. Maybe a month ago or so at this point, that basically just bans abortion straightforward from conception. And there are some -- you know, obviously, likable the mother. So forth. But we really need to start thinking about trying to craft legislation now, at the state level. But to your point, I do fear that the blue states will only double down in their radicalism. Unfortunately within that will only lead to an ever greater divide, in our country, that we have today. But obviously, at the end of the day. We're going to save at the end of the day, millions and millions of unborn children. We are going to save human beings who can grow up to cure cancer, who can win Nobel prices.

I mean, this is just a tremendous win for the human species. I don't know how to say it other than that.

GLENN: I will tell you, I saw the stat, that I think it was last year or the year before. 20 percent of all pregnancies ended in abortion. 20 percent.

JOSH: Wow.

GLENN: That is -- that is a shocking number. And we do have our -- our work cut out for us. Because I -- I think that these states are going to double down. But I think, you know -- God doesn't waste anything. You know, there is no waste with God. Even the -- even the worst things that could possibly happen, turn out to be something good. You know what I mean? You're like, holy cow, how did that just happen.

And I think that evil is going to fully come unmasked. I'm telling you, Josh. I don't know how you feel about this. I think this could be the day of America's Kristallnacht. I can see these pro-life centers being burned to the ground today. They're calling for a night of rage around the country. I think evil is going to show itself. And that will scare the American people, hopefully.

JOSH: You know, I've been thinking about this a lot this week, actually. Because I've been bracing for a new kind of George Floyd summer of love, happening this summer. Coming to a city or suburb near you. Unfortunately, myself. Look, I live in Florida. I know, Glenn, you live in Texas. It is in moments like this, where I do think that where you live matters. And who your mayor is. Who your governor is, matters.

Because law and order and rioting and anarchy is not really a federal issue. It is to a limited extent. June 2020, Tom Cotton wrote this op-ed that was pretty controversial at the time.

I happen to agree with it. Where he said, quote, unquote, send in the troops. And there is some federal legislation from the reconstruction era that would justify that.

But most kind of quelling and quashing of anarchy does happen. Constitutionally speaking, at the state and local level. So at a moment like this, where I fear that you're probably not wrong. I take some solace. That Governor DeSantis is my governor. I think Texans should take some solace, that they are represented by -- by a Republican governor. The legislature there as well. So I -- I fear that you are right. I pray obviously, that no one -- it's hard.

I fear that it's something -- that something bad is happening. At the end of the day, of course. It does not mean that justices cannot do what they are supposed to do. So thank God they did that.

GLENN: So, Josh, have you looked into what the White House has been saying? The White House yesterday. In fact, do we have a clip of -- of this?

What the White House said yesterday, about the guns. And then they were turned to the -- the Scott us ruling, for Roe vs. Wade. Do we have that, please?

JOSH: Will the president accept this decision, even if he disagrees with it?

VOICE: I think it's going to come from the Supreme Court. So it's a decision we certainly are going to respond to. I'll leave it at that. Just like any other Supreme Court decision. Just like the one they did today on guns.

GLENN: So the White House won't say that they're going to accept it.

Which I don't think they will. They're talking now about taking doctors and moving them into places like Oklahoma or Texas, where abortions will be outlawed. And putting doctors on our military bases to perform abortions.

I mean, where does this go, when you have a government, that is in defiance of -- of one branch of the government?

JOSH: So there's a lot to unpack here. So we should start from first principles. The idea of judicial supremacy, and this is a peculiar thing, to say on a day like today, where such a pro-life victory has happened in Italy. But if we're going to be consistent here, the idea of judicial supremacy. The idea that the justices, have the sole and exclusive ability to interpret the Constitution for themselves. And no other Constitutional actor, in article one or article two, let alone the state. Has the ability to tentatively interpret it. That is erroneous. In fact, actually it was really Abraham Lincoln actually, who in the Dred Scott case, famously opposed judicial supremacy and flouted the Dred Scott ruling, at least as it pertains to everybody other than Dred Scott himself. I have actually argued, a former legal scholarship, in a law review article actually, that the Laconian view of how each branch of government should interpret the Constitution for itself, is correct.

Having said that. Having said that, there is a thing called prudence. And there is a thing called comedy. And in a moment like today, when it really does look like -- and I agree with you, that we are now bracing for riots through the streets. When the political rhetoric is at DEFCON one. When people are trying to assassinate Supreme Court justices. I think it would be -- at its bare minimum, a profoundly imprudent act. For the Biden administration, to try to undermine this ruling.

Now, what they might do, is they might try to kind of issue some kind of executive orders, or issue some regulations, that might try to kind of undermine it, at the edges here. But at the end of the day, the idea that this returns to the state. There's not really a whole lot they can do about that. Basically, at this point, throughout the country. Kentucky within West Virginia. Kansas. Whatever. If they want to go ahead and ban abortion, what can the Biden administration literally do about that? I mean, short of sending in the National Guard, to protect Planned Parenthood, if the state legislature of Kentucky goes ahead and bans it. There's not a whole lot they can do. And it's very difficult to envision a world, in which the Biden administration literally sends in troops to red states, to protect Planned Parenthood, if that state legislature goes ahead and bans it. So for practically speaking. This is a lot of tough talk and rhetoric. Obviously the campaign here in 2022. There's not really a whole lot that practically speaking, they can do to actually prevent red and purple states from enacting pro-life legislation.

GLENN: I'm glad to -- I'm glad to hear that. I know that they have been working on things. I mean, he has said, you know, there's executive orders, that I can employ. There are things that I can do. He's talked about a national public health emergency. Which I think is just -- is crazy. But I would hope, that the president would come out and say, we strongly disagree with this. And you're right. The court is not the end all. But the court did not end abortion. It just said, the people should decide. I think that's the best kind of court ruling, on any of it. The people should decide what this is. And send it back to the states. Josh, I thank you very much. Appreciate your time. Was there -- there was another ruling, that came out today. Was it important?

JOSH: Oh, no. In comparison to this. A total nothing burger. A 5-4 decision on Medicare reimbursement related. So nothing, honestly.

GLENN: Great. Thank you very much. Appreciate it, Josh. Josh Hammer, opinion editor for Newsweek. And the host of the Josh Hammer show.

GLENN: There are two things trending on twitter right now.

Number one is praise God.

Number two trend is Night of Rage.

Good verses evil.

Build up or tear down.

'Lord, we are SORRY it has taken us this long': BlazeTV hosts react to historic Roe v. Wade decision

Photo by Yasin Ozturk/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

The Supreme Court of the United States officially overturned Roe V. Wade, and the debate over abortion rights has been given back to the states. On this historic day, BlazeTV hosts celebrate the Supreme Court's incredible decision and take a look at some of the insane reactions as the left comes completely undone.

Jason Whitlock: Today will forever stand as a pivotal moment in our nation’s history

The Supreme Court of the United States overturned Roe v. Wade. The decision and the reaction to it have already revealed a lot about our people and politics. Pro-life groups celebrate, pro-choice groups call for “a night of rage,” and Nancy Pelosi just seems completely confused by the United States Constitution.

Glenn Beck reacts LIVE to Roe v. Wade ruling: 'Lord, we are SORRY it has taken us this long'

I never thought that in my lifetime, I would see Roe v. Wade be overturned. But today, that day has come. The Supreme Court has voted 6 to 3 to return decisions about abortion to the states. But this fight isn't over. We are about to see good versus evil side by side. Many states will stand with the unborn. But others will become abortion mills. It's your turn to choose now, America!

Allie Beth Stuckey: 'Praise God, Roe v. Wade is overturned!'

I don't know about you, but I just had the most euphoric feelings. It almost seems too good to be true. I didn't think there was any way that this would actually happen, especially with all the backlash, intimidation, and violence toward the Supreme Court justices. And yet, here we are. Roe v. Wade has been overturned. This is an amazing day!

Dave Rubin: Big disagreement on what happens next now that Roe v. Wade is overturned

Dave Rubin, Libby Emmons, Jeffrey A. Tucker, and David Reaboi debate what will happen in the wake of the Supreme Court’s breaking decision on Roe v. Wade. Now that abortion rights have been pushed back to the states, will there be a summer of massive riots or not? Will the Roe v. Wade ruling make America’s political polarization significantly worse?

Stu Burguiere: Here are the reasons SCOTUS overturned Roe v. Wade

I never thought this would happen. I never thought I would see this day. I just never ever ever ever never ever believed that Roe v. Wade would actually be overturned. I really didn't. But let's take a look at the reasons this day has finally come ...

The Rick & Bubba Show: 'This is history! Unfortunately we're 60 million lives too late'

We were live on the air when news broke of the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.