Quiet Phenomenon




Mark Steyn, author of America Alone

GLENN: And we have Mark Steyn from Mark Steyn Online with us now. This guy is -- you're an American citizen, aren't you?

STEYN: No, I'm a legal resident of the state. See, you and I had lunch with Don Rumsfeld a while back and he asked to see my green card. He wasn't going to take my word as to my immigration status.

GLENN: Sure, all right. Yeah, that always happens when I have lunch with Don Rumsfeld, but jeez.

STEYN: You get lunch with Diane Sawyer.

GLENN: Yeah. Okay. So Mark, I wanted to talk to you about a couple of things. First of all, Fred Thompson. Who do you think the voters are going to go to that were with Fred Thompson? Where do they go?

STEYN: I think most of -- I think the two kinds of people who like Fred Thompson. One of the people who are sort of attracted to him kind of culturally because he's a Southerner and all that and I think some of that (loss of audio) This idea that oh, well, no, no, no, we're not going to compete in Iowa because that's full of evangelicals, we're not going to compete in New Hampshire because that's northeast and liberal, libertarian thing, we're not going to compete in Nevada, that's full of crazy Mormons, we're not going to compete in South Carolina because that's full of Southerners and yet somehow he is the only candidate who can beat Hillary. He had this kind of national candidacy that I think was a disastrous strategy. It's like it wasn't rooted anywhere. I said, I think the last time I was with him, I said it was like a 1-800 candidacy. It's just sort of out there. You are never sure, it's got no real area code, it's got no real base and I think he's done for.

GLENN: Do you think, do you really think McCain is going to be -- I don't know who I'd vote for if it's Clinton/McCain.

STEYN: I don't know, either. And to be honest I think we're looking at a very unhappy scenario.

GLENN: On both sides. I know tons of New York City, Manhattan, Central Park flaming on-fire liberals that are like, oh, I'll kill myself if I have to vote for Hillary.

STEYN: Yes, exactly. But in the end they won't kill themselves and they will vote for her because it's much more difficult for a Democrat candidate to annoy portions of the base sufficiently so that they don't turn out for them.

GLENN: Right.

STEYN: Than it is for the (lapse in audio)

GLENN: This kind of music behind it because I'm thinking, oh, yeah. Look at them. They're all discovering that he lies and he distorts the truth and he plays hard ball and all of a sudden they're like, this isn't right, this isn't fair.

STEYN: No, no.

GLENN: No.

STEYN: I love it. The Hillary Clinton fans up there and denounces Barack Obama as a slum lord to his face, you've got to hand it to these guys.

GLENN: It's amazing. How about the Republican side?

STEYN: The Republican side, to be honest, I wish the Republican side, instead of sleeping through Martin Luther King's speech could be put to sleep because I think it's turning into a tragedy and I think John McCain -- I prefer -- I disagree with Ron Paul but Ron Paul has a particular philosophy and so when something arises, he frames it within that philosophy. John McCain, my job with John McCain is he's all over the map. It seems to be just whether a particular issue plays well for John McCain. I don't want to -- if the Republicans candidate is pro massive big government solutions to global warming, I don't see what's so conservative about that.

GLENN: You know, and honestly if it wasn't for the war, I just don't think I would pull the lever for John McCain if it was against Hillary Clinton but I -- and I may not. If it comes down to those two, I may not. I just may not be able to do it. If there's not a third party running, I just don't think I would pull the lever. I just don't think I would do it.

STEYN: No, I think that's becoming the issue, that people say, oh, well, it's going to be a clothespin election and you hold your nose and you go and vote. The trouble is that always works better for the Democrats. As we go back again to Bill Clinton, no matter how big the stench, they all go in there. It's choking them, you know. They've got industrial strength clothespin on the nose but they will still go in there and pull the lever and Republicans aren't like that.

GLENN: If we pulled the lever as a conservative for a guy who is that far off the mark of conservative values, then what happens to us is we've turned into the Fed.

STEYN: Yeah.

GLENN: We've enabled -- we won't let ourselves bottom out. Bottom out, man, and brush that kind of stuff out of the conservative movement because if that guy wins, he becomes the face of the conservative movement, and I'm sorry but that ain't the face of the conservative movement.

STEYN: No, and I think the problem here is that -- you're right, you know. He's reliable on the -- he doesn't want to lose the war because he had that experience in Vietnam. He was out there and the folks back at home decided that all the guys sitting in there in the torture chambers of the Viet Cong and the rest of the gang, that those guys were going to lose the war, the decision was made back in Washington and he doesn't want to make that. He doesn't want to do that. But I don't think that's actually a good enough reason to vote for McCain because aside from that sort of basic feeling, this idea that he's sort of promoting that he's the guy behind the surge, he was always for the surge, he actually advocated when he was calling for a change of strategy in Iraq, it wasn't what eventually happened that did happen. I mean, this idea that he deserves credit for everything that's gone well in Iraq in the last year I think is ludicrous and I don't think he thinks that much about the bigger picture on the war, either. I'm not sure he's the guy for that.

GLENN: Sure.

STEYN: So I think it's a problematic choice in November and the lesson as well I think is that, you know, insofar as the Democrats get changed, that's determined by events. You know, they've stopped talking like nuts on the war now only because they would sound ridiculous if they would start because in a sense events have outpaced the lunacy of their rhetoric. But other than that I think bringing the allergy to bear on the candidates is going to be extremely difficult come November.

GLENN: If you are a listener of this program or you are a reader of shockingly good books, you know Mark Steyn from America Alone, which is a book that I think every American should read if you want to see the future. But, you know, a lot of people will say -- and you're in trouble up in Canada.

STEYN: That's right.

GLENN: They don't want you to say anything about Islamic extremism. Let me ask you this because this just came out from Time magazine and I want to know who are you going to hate now, now that Saudi Arabia has come into the future and is allowing women to stay in a hotel or a furnished apartment without a male guardian?

STEYN: The walls come crumbling down.

GLENN: And they all, I mean, they finally have made it to 1898 and I think that's beautiful.

STEYN: My sister-in-law lived in Saudi Arabia for a while because her husband was working out there and she had this fantastic range. I occasionally buy her one for Christmas. The Saudi bathing suits that the rich Saudi women wear, there's more material in them than the entire cast of Janet Jackson and the Super Bowl show, all of them put together in this one bathing suit.

GLENN: That's not saying a lot. That's not saying a lot.

STEYN: No, no, if you take everyone, if you take not just Janet Jackson and the wardrobe malfunction, if you take the stage hands, take all their clothes, this Saudi bathing suit that my sister --

GLENN: Why the hate, Mark, why the hate? They are letting women stay in hotel rooms by themselves now. How much more progress do you want?

STEYN: Well, they are still not allowed to drive over there.

GLENN: Oh, jeez, it's always something with you.

STEYN: The big thing they have, what is it, Chop Chop Square at 4:00 on a Friday where they have the executions of the week, the Saudi women are not allowed to go. Think, well, it's Friday, it's Friday afternoon in Saudi Arabia, the weekend starts here, let's party, let's go see the week's executions. They are still not allowed to go and see the week's executions.

GLENN: Oh, you are kidding me. Well, now I'm revved up. Now I'm against it. They won't let the women go attend the free executions?

STEYN: Exactly.

GLENN: What kind of backwards society is that?

STEYN: Exactly. And how many -- and talk about your glub feeling. There is yet to be a female execution in Saudi history.

GLENN: Oh, my -- when they start executing women, then, then maybe we'll reevaluate. But until they start executing women --

STEYN: Glenn, that's one thing they do do. They executed -- they even executed a couple of princesses. I forget what it was about. A prince fell out with them but they do --

GLENN: Well, now I've started to soften on them again.

STEYN: No, women have equal access to being decapitated.

GLENN: All right, good. If I was ready to cut off aid to Saudi Arabia, say maybe we shouldn't be in bed with these guys.

STEYN: No, this shows the benefits of engagement. 70 years of engagement, they can now check into a hotel.

GLENN: One more -- this is so bad. One more thing I just have to touch base with you. You did -- because I have to tell you, Mark, I read the New York Times and I don't know why I do it to myself, but I couldn't read the whole article because the paper was covered in blood that had come shooting directly out of my eyes where they were trying to make our soldiers look like deadly killers.

STEYN: Right.

GLENN: It was like a three-page article. The moment they come back, they start slaughtering people.

STEYN: Yeah.

GLENN: You did the best. Wouldn't it be nice if the New York Times ever cared about facts, stories I've ever heard. In 90 seconds give, in a nutshell, how unbelievably wrong the New York Times was on this.

STEYN: Well, they claim to have detected the so-called quiet phenomenon, as they put it, in returning veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan were going berserk killing people, killing wives, killing people at convenience stores, killing people all over the country.

GLENN: Almost like they're Saudi Arabians.

STEYN: Yes. And it turned, of course, that these are a few dozen isolated incidents and that, in fact, veterans murder at a fifth of the rate of the equivalent gentle population. So generally speaking if you're at an airport and you see a soldier returning from Iraq or you see just like a regular guy with a goofy baseball cap, go and stand next to the soldier because he's five times less likely to kill you. And why the New York Times couldn't figure this out when everybody else did, I don't know. It's kind of mental illness over there.

GLENN: Why the hate on the New York Times in Saudi Arabia? Just because, you know, they'll not let women watch public executions and the New York Times throws our soldiers under the bus all the time with incorrect facts, why do you always feel like it's your responsibility to lead this campaign?

STEYN: Well, I think they sort of yoked on the side of these kind of crazy Saudi guys unintentionally because it's like the sort of dinner theater version of the Hitler/Stalin pact. On the one side, you know, the New York Times are Progressive liberals and the Saudis are crazy theocrats, yet objectively if America is and if mainstream American opinion and disposition is on the other side, they will be always against that.

GLENN: Does it ever kill you how inconsistent? I had, last night on TV I had the editor of the San Francisco Chronicle. Did you see this, Stu?

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: I have to play this. We have to have it available at all times. I get so much heat because I'm wrecking television because I'm not a journalist. Sean Penn called himself a journalist, never graduated from journalism school. The editor of the San Francisco Chronicle was on last night saying, well, you could be a journalist if you just say you're a journalist.

STEYN: Yes.

GLENN: It's incredible!

STEYN: It's not a profession. It's not like being a brain surgeon. It's not like being a Pope. Anybody can do it. And only in America would you say, ooh, I want to be a journalist, I better pay a mortgage, get my parents to mortgage a house and go to college for six years. Anybody can do it. All going to journalism school will do for you is kill your ability to write. So get out there and start doing it.

GLENN: But I have to tell you, though, Mark, if it is a conservative that does not have a degree, they cannot be a journalist. But an actor that goes and kisses, you know, the Ayatollah and Chavez, he's absolutely a journalist.

STEYN: Yes, that's right. I always liked Frank Sinatra once. He was landing at some airport somewhere and they asked what he thought of the Vietnam War and he said, hey, I'm a singer, you know. It's always, I would love it if any celebrity got off the airplane and did that today. Speaks well for them.

GLENN: Mark Steyn from Mark Steyn Online and that's, by the way, with a Y in the name and the author of America Alone, Steynonline. Thank you very much, sir. Appreciate it.

STEYN: Always a pleasure. Bye-bye.


 

Everything comes down to the two Senate runoffs in Georgia. If we lose both races, we lose the country. Democrats know this and are pouring in millions to usher in a Marxist agenda.

As the Left tries to hide how radical the two candidates really are, Glenn takes us inside the Democrat war room to expose the wolf in pastor's clothing, Raphael Warnock, and America's Justin Trudeau, Jon Ossoff. Socialism, the Green New Deal, and "defund the police" are all on the table. And Glenn warns of what's to come if conservatives don't activate: Chuck Schumer will weaponize the Senate, and the radical Left will launch an all-out assault to ravage the Constitution.

Watch the full special below:

The election and its aftermath are the most important stories in America. That's why we're offering our most timely discount ever: $30 off a one-year subscription to BlazeTV with code "GLENN." With BlazeTV, you get the unvarnished truth from the most pro-America network in the country, free from Big Tech and MSM censors.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) joined the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" to explain how mail-in ballots are typically disqualified during recounts at a far higher rate than in-person, Election Day ballots, and why this is "good news" for President Donald Trump's legal battle over the election.

"One of the things that gives the greatest cause for optimism is, this election ... there's a pretty marked disparity in terms of how the votes were distributed. On Election Day, with in-person voting, Donald Trump won a significant majority of the votes cast on in-person voting on Election Day. Of mail-in voting, Joe Biden won a significant majority of the votes cast early on mail-in voting," Cruz explained.

"Now, here's the good news: If you look historically to recounts, if you look historically to election litigation, the votes cast in person on Election Day tend to stand. It's sort of hard to screw that up. Those votes are generally legal, and they're not set aside. Mail-in votes historically have a much higher rate of rejection … when they're examined, there are a whole series of legal requirements that vary state by state, but mail-in votes consistently have a higher rate of rejection, which suggests that as these votes begin being examined and subjected to scrutiny, that you're going to see Joe Biden's vote tallies go down. That's a good thing," he added. "The challenge is, for President Trump to prevail, he's got to run the table. He's got to win, not just in one state but in several states. That makes it a lot harder to prevail in the litigation. I hope that he does so, but it is a real challenge and we shouldn't try to convince ourselves otherwise."

Watch the video clip below to catch more of the conversation:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Subscribe to BlazeTV today with our BEST DEAL EVER for $30 off with promo code GLENN.

Fox News senior meteorologist Janice Dean is perhaps even more disgusted with New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) for his coronavirus response than BlazeTV's Stu Burguiere (read what Stu has to say on the subject here), and for a good reason.

She lost both of her in-laws to COVID-19 in New York's nursing homes after Gov. Cuomo's infamous nursing home mandate, which Cuomo has since had scrubbed from the state's website and blamed everyone from the New York Post to nursing care workers to (every leftist's favorite scapegoat) President Donald Trump.

Janice joined Glenn and Stu on the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" Tuesday to ask why mainstream media is not holding Gov. Cuomo — who recently published a book about his leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic — accountable?

"I'm vocal because I have not seen the mainstream media ask these questions or demand accountability of their leaders. [Cuomo] really has been ruling with an iron fist, and every time he does get asked a question, he blames everybody else except the person that signed that order," Janice said.

"In my mind, he's profiting off the over 30 thousand New Yorkers, including my in-laws, that died by publishing a book on 'leadership' of New York," she added. "His order has helped kill thousands of relatives of New York state. And this is not political, Glenn. This is not about Republican or Democrat. My in-laws were registered Democrats. This is not about politics. This is about accountability for something that went wrong, and it's because of your [Cuomo's] leadership that we're put into this situation."

Watch the video excerpt from the show below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

As America grows divided and afraid to disagree with the Democrats' woke plan for America, Megyn Kelly is ready to fight back for the truth. For nearly two decades, she navigated the volatile and broken world of the media. But as America leans on independent voices more than ever, she's breaking new ground with "The Megyn Kelly Show."

She joined the latest Glenn Beck Podcast to break down what's coming next after the election: Black Lives Matter is mainstream, leftists are making lists of Trump supporters, and the Hunter Biden scandal is on the back burner.

Megyn and Glenn reminisce about their cable news days (including her infamous run-in with then-presidential candidate Donald Trump) and to look into the chaotic and shady world of journalism and the growing entitlement it's bred. For example, many conservatives have been shocked by how Fox News handled the election.

Megyn defended Fox News, saying she believes Fox News' mission "is a good one," but also didn't hold back on hosts like Neil Cavuto, who cut off a White House briefing to fact check it — something she never would have done, even while covering President Obama.

Megyn also shared this insightful takeaway from her time at NBC: "Jane Fonda was an ass."

Watch the full podcast here:

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.