Gambit



Gambit


by Karna Small Bodman

GLENN: I was down in Florida. I had a few minutes to sit down and talk to an author of, it's called gamut and the arrest thundershower is Karna Small Bodman and she was a reporter for a San Francisco television station and she moved to Washington, D.C. where she was an anchorperson there and then at one point Jim Brady was named press secretary for Ronald Reagan and she was Jim Brady's deputy press secretary. And we had a fascinating conversation. She's writing something for Fusion. She's actually our latest author for our Seven Days series which is in Fusion magazine. Karna, how are you?

BODMAN: Well, I'm great, Glenn. Good to be with you today.

GLENN: How was your weekend?

BODMAN: It was terrific. I was thrilled because this new book came out. Got a couple of great reviews in the Sunday paper. It kind of made my weekend.

GLENN: Get out of here. Did they know you used to work at the White House?

BODMAN: Yeah, but I guess they liked the book anyway.

GLENN: Holy cow. I'm surprised. Usually they won't even review it.

BODMAN: Is this weird or what.

GLENN: So the book is actually, the book is fascinating. It is actually about technology that we have sitting on a shelf some place.

BODMAN: Right.

GLENN: To protect our airplanes. Tell the story a little bit.

BODMAN: Well, actually right now our Department of Homeland Security has had contracts out with a couple of defense contractors to adapt military technology for use on commercial flights to protect against things like, you know, a shoulder-fired missile or something like that. But here's the problem. The technology sitting on the shelf. There's no money to deploy it. You know, the airlines are broke and the Government doesn't want to pay for it. So it's sitting there and yet it's not a stretch to think that some terrorist group some place could get a hold of a couple of these weapons. There are about close to a million of them floating around the world. They make a --

GLENN: Do you remember, was this the -- was the inspiration for this book at all the guy -- remember the guy, what is it, in New Jersey?

BODMAN: Right, right, right. He was arrested trying to acquire a shoulder-fired missile from, turned out to be an undercover agent, thank God. But you see, the problem is these things are floating around. They are making them, Russia, China, all over. And imagine the chaos if, my Lord, somebody were to get a hold of one and try to take down a plane or two. And in "Gambit," the story of "Gambit" is that the White House calls in our missile defense expert, Dr. Cameron Talbot who was featured in the first book, "Checkmate." But anyway, called her back in to try to perfect a laser technique for protecting a plane. Now, you know, the whole process for protecting our commercial airliners is actually, it's not that expensive. Okay, yeah, costs about a million dollars a plane. That's less than they pay for, you know, the audio system on a plane. And so --

GLENN: Is this the same kind of technology -- I know El Al will never say what they have on the planes but you know they've got stuff on their planes. Do you think this is kind of stuff El Al has on their planes?

BODMAN: I don't know exactly what they do have but I know they have protection systems and people that fly on those kinds of planes are willing to give up a little fancy service in exchange for security. They really are. So in the story of Gambit, you know, the trouble is it kind of shows what could happen while we're sitting around, you know, just waiting. But, you know, lest you think it's all technology or, you know, all scary parts, which it is, it's a thriller, there's also a relationship thing in there, a little romantic, the highest levels of the White House. We're trying to make it realistic here, okay?

GLENN: I'm uncomfortable. Wait a minute. Realistic? Are you saying that there was something, there were things going on in the Reagan White House when you were there?

BODMAN: No, no, no, that is not what I'm saying. I'm just trying to say the book does reflect some aspects of life in Washington, a little political intrigue here and there.

GLENN: Let me ask you this. I mean, you worked at the Reagan White House.

BODMAN: Right.

GLENN: I just talked to Michael Reagan last week and I said how sick are you of hearing politicians say I'm like Ronald Reagan, and that was your dad. Do you see any politician out there that you think has the qualities of Ronald Reagan? Is there anybody out there that you have seen?

BODMAN: Not exactly. Of course, now I sound like an old Hertz commercial. Look, I love it when they are all trying to be Ronald Reagan: It shows that they admire what he did. I mean, all of his policies and his personality, especially his policies, if they would all adopt some more Reaganesque, you know, positions, I think we would be in a lot better shape.

GLENN: I was going to say they don't even understand his positions. They don't understand his values.

BODMAN: And that's what the man had, Glenn. He had values going in. He had built enough over the years. You know, these were his core beliefs in, you know, reduction in tax rates, homeland, you know, being strong and peace through strength, individual responsibility. You know, he is the kind of a person who would subscribe to the line that free enterprise is the enterprise of free men, you know? I mean, his whole key was the spread of freedom. Now, he used to say, people say they want peace. You could have peace if you just went through the streets and locked up all the dissidents. You would have peace. But that's not the answer.

GLENN: I mean, you were there, you were there as deputy press secretary when he was meeting with Pope John Paul, II, et cetera, et cetera. I was talking earlier today that we are repeating the end of Russia, the end of the Soviet Union except we're now the Soviet Union. There's a Cold War going on, they're spending us to death. We're in Afghanistan. Osama Bin Laden is really on their side, not our side. The oil thing, I mean, the pressures are early similarly, are they not? Or is it just me?

BODMAN: Well, there are some different pressures because, you know, we had a different, quote, enemy at the time. And now we are facing Islamic fascism.

GLENN: Right, but I mean the pressures.

BODMAN: Remember back in Reagan's day the assassination of Sa'adat? That was by Islamic jihadists. You know, they were running around that getting stronger and stronger. But okay, so it's a slightly different set of circumstances but the important values and keys still remain and that is, you know, being strong at home, building up your defenses, you know, being as strong as you can internationally and standing up for what you believe in. Look, these people, they hate our system of free enterprise, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of religion and especially the way they treat women. And so we've got to stand up for our values and not just say, oh, well, you know, let's all get along, you know, and be naive about the whole thing. So when you talk about the candidates, it's kind of like a thriller. It's real scary out there.

GLENN: The name of the book is "Gambit." It is on sale now. She is also the author of "Checkmate," which is the first book. The "Gambit" is a political thriller. It's the stuff that you're going to -- it's the stuff that somebody at some point when the plane comes down in this way, they are going to go, oh, my gosh, did you read this book. You can get it available at bookstores everywhere. Of course if you would like to read that chapter as well as the chapter of the other best selling authors like Brad Thor, Ted Bell, et cetera, et cetera of Seven Days, you can get that in Fusion magazine. Call now, 888-Glenn-Beck or go to GlennBeck.com. Don't miss another chapter including Karna's chapter and her name of the book again is "Gambit."

Most self-proclaimed Marxists know very little about Marxism. Some of them have all the buzzwords memorized. They talk about the exploits of labor. They talk about the slavery of capitalist society and the alienation caused by capital. They talk about the evils of power and domination.

But they don't actually believe what they say. Or else they wouldn't be such violent hypocrites. And we're not being dramatic when we say "violent."

For them, Marxism is a political tool that they use to degrade and annoy their political enemies.

They don't actually care about the working class.

Another important thing to remember about Marxists is that they talk about how they want to defend the working class, but they don't actually understand the working class. They definitely don't realize that the working class is composed mostly of so many of the people they hate. Because, here's the thing, they don't actually care about the working class. Or the middle class. They wouldn't have the slightest clue how to actually work, not the way we do. For them, work involves ranting about how work and labor are evil.

Ironically, if their communist utopia actually arrived, they would be the first ones against the wall. Because they have nothing to offer except dissent. They have no practical use and no real connection to reality.

Again ironically, they are the ultimate proof of the success of capitalism. The fact that they can freely call for its demise, in tweets that they send from their capitalistic iPhones, is proof that capitalism affords them tremendous luxuries.

Their specialty is complaining. They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They sneer at Christianity for promising Heaven in exchange for good deeds on earth — which is a terrible description of Christianity, but it's what they actually believe — and at the same time they criticize Christianity for promising a utopia, they give their unconditional devotion to a religion that promises a utopia.

They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They think capitalism has turned us into machines. Which is a bad interpretation of Marx's concept of the General Intellect, the idea that humans are the ones who create machines, so humans, not God, are the creators.

They think that the only way to achieve the perfect society is by radically changing and even destroying the current society. It's what they mean when they say things about the "status quo" and "hegemony" and the "established order." They believe that the system is broken and the way to fix it is to destroy, destroy, destroy.

Critical race theory actually takes it a step farther. It tells us that the racist system can never be changed. That racism is the original sin that white people can never overcome. Of course, critical race theorists suggest "alternative institutions," but these "alternative institutions" are basically the same as the ones we have now, only less effective and actually racist.

Marx's violent revolution never happened. Or at least it never succeeded. Marx's followers have had to take a different approach. And now, we are living through the Revolution of Constant Whining.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.

Americans are losing faith in our justice system and the idea that legal consequences are applied equally — even to powerful elites in office.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to detail what he believes will come next with the Durham investigation, which hopefully will provide answers to the Obama FBI's alleged attempts to sabotage former President Donald Trump and his campaign years ago.

Rep. Nunes and Glenn assert that we know Trump did NOT collude with Russia, and that several members of the FBI possibly committed huge abuses of power. So, when will we see justice?

Watch the video clip below:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The corporate media is doing everything it can to protect Dr. Anthony Fauci after Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) roasted him for allegedly lying to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

During an extremely heated exchange at a Senate hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Paul challenged Dr. Fauci — who, as the director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, oversees research programs at the National Institute of Health — on whether the NIH funded dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Dr. Fauci denied the claims, but as Sen. Paul knows, there are documents that prove Dr. Fauci's NIH was funding gain-of-function research in the Wuhan biolab before COVID-19 broke out in China.

On "The Glenn Beck Program," Glenn and Producer Stu Burguiere presented the proof, because Dr. Fauci's shifting defenses don't change the truth.

Watch the video clip below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Critical race theory: A special brand of evil

wal_172619/Pixabay

Part of what makes it hard for us to challenge the left is that their beliefs are complicated. We don't mean complicated in a positive way. They aren't complicated the way love is complicated. They're complicated because there's no good explanation for them, no basis in reality.

The left cannot pull their heads out of the clouds. They are stuck on romantic ideas, abstract ideas, universal ideas. They talk in theories. They see the world through ideologies. They cannot divorce themselves from their own academic fixations. And — contrary to what they believe and how they act — it's not because leftists are smarter than the rest of us. And studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country. Marx was no different. The Communist Manifesto talks about how the rise of cities "rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life."

Studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country.

Instead of admitting that they're pathological hypocrites, they tell us that we're dumb and tell us to educate ourselves. Okay, so we educate ourselves; we return with a coherent argument. Then they say, "Well, you can't actually understand what you just said unless you understand the work of this other obscure Marxist writer. So educate yourselves more."

It's basically the "No True Scotsman" fallacy, the idea that when you point out a flaw in someone's argument, they say, "Well, that's a bad example."

After a while, it becomes obvious that there is no final destination for their bread-crumb trail. Everything they say is based on something that somebody else said, which is based on something somebody else said.

Take critical race theory. We're sure you've noticed by now that it is not evidence-based — at all. It is not, as academics say, a quantitative method. It doesn't use objective facts and data to arrive at conclusions. Probably because most of those conclusions don't have any basis in reality.

Critical race theory is based on feelings. These feelings are based on theories that are also based on feelings.

We wanted to trace the history of critical race theory back to the point where its special brand of evil began. What allowed it to become the toxic, racist monster that it is today?

Later, we'll tell you about some of the snobs who created critical theory, which laid the groundwork for CRT. But if you follow the bread-crumb trail from their ideas, you wind up with Marxism.

For years, the staff has devoted a lot of time to researching Marxism. We have read a lot of Marx and Marxist writing. It's part of our promise to you to be as informed as possible, so that you know where to go for answers; so that you know what to say when your back is up against the wall. What happens when we take the bread-crumb trail back farther, past Marxism? What is it based on?

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism.

It's actually based on the work of one of the most important philosophers in human history, a 19th-century German philosopher named Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism. And, as you'll see in just a bit, if we look at Hegel's actual ideas, it's obvious that Marx completely misrepresented them in order to confirm his own fantasies.

So, in a way, that's where the bread-crumb trail ends: With Marx's misrepresentation of an incredibly important, incredibly useful philosophy, a philosophy that's actually pretty conservative.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.