Glenn speaks with Michael Smerconish on Fidel's resignation

GLENN: Let me go to Michael. Where is Michael? Do you have him up? Michael, how are you, sir?

SMERCONISH: Hi, Glenn, I'm well.

GLENN: Kind of a sad did I for you.


SMERCONISH: Oh, come on.

GLENN: No, seriously.

SMERCONISH: It's a sad day for me because I'll be turning my head and coughing. I've got a physical today.

GLENN: That's right, double whammy. Castro steps down and you've got to have somebody's finger in places where fingers shouldn't be.

SMERCONISH: Oh, man. So I'd be thrilled to talk about Fidel Castro. In fact, keep me on three hours.

GLENN: Yeah. You actually were -- you met Fidel Castro, did an interview with him.

SMERCONISH: Yeah, actually spent six and a half hours in his house with him a couple of years ago and among the many things that stand out in my mind is that the Cubans assigned me to a particular hotel where I was put in Room 646. I was traveling with two other guys. One of them was in 346 and the other was in 746 and I was convinced that they must have run, like, the bugging cable in the 46 suites.

GLENN: How, may I just ask, how does one get an invitation, unless you are Oliver Stone or Michael Moore, how does one get an invitation?

SMERCONISH: Theoretically I was a journalist. I mean, you know me. I don't consider myself as such. I'm based in Philly on your station. But Senator Arlen Specter was going down to meet with Fidel Castro to talk about joint terrorist initiatives in the aftermath of September 11th and he invited me to go along. He said, you know, pay your own way, get credentialed as a journalist and if the meeting happens, I'll get you in the room, and the meeting happened for, as I say, six and a half hours at the Flogao De La Revolucion. Believe me, I'm not hear to sing his virtues. I would never do that.

GLENN: Which one? Arlen Specter or Fidel Castro?

SMERCONISH: It was really quite an encounter. I mean, among the surprises, you think that communism is an old man's game and yet he was surrounded by guys in their 30s much like you would see a member of the Senate or the House. So I'm watching these events going on down there where his brother Raul is going to get stuck in that position and many people are saying, well, then at least Raul will be the last of them. Not from what I saw. There are a lot of eager communists on the make down there in Cuba.

GLENN: I have to tell you, Michael, I heard somebody say -- maybe it was President Bush -- what will this mean for the Cuban people? And maybe democracy will take root. And I thought, no. What's going to happen is they're going to turn to a Chinese style economy. They're going to stay communist and they will open it up. I mean, that's the new model. Russia is doing it now, China is doing it now. It's the new model.

SMERCONISH: Glenn, I believe that the embargo has been a total failure and quite the contrary of taking down Castro or his brother. It has absolutely kept him in power. A lot of your listeners, particularly in Florida, are not going to like hearing me say this, but the reality is that their society on a day-to-day basis, their standard of living is crap. And he gets to blame every problem that exists on the Americans and the American embargo. We've created a boogeyman for him.

GLENN: I'm sorry. I thought the boogieman we send down named Michael Moore. I thought he was the one and they were like, oh, he's the actual boogeyman. No, he's a filmmaker, believe it or not. Why do you suppose, Michael, that all of the people in Hollywood go down there like you and --


GLENN: Just hang out with him. Hey. You can call him Fi or Fidel or Del. What did you call him?

SMERCONISH: I wish you hadn't brought this up. When I came home, I wrote about my experience and I talked about a particular exchange that I had with him where I called him Mr. President, and I got hate letters for the next six to nine months from Cubans in Florida who said, how dare you call him Mr. President. I mean, forget that my question asked him to condemn terrorism. They said I had no place, you know, in his own house calling him Mr. President.

GLENN: What were you supposed to call --

SMERCONISH: This guy wrote to me and he said, I will always remember your name. So every time I'm on a program like Glenn Beck's nationwide, I'm thinking, I get that guy's out there right now.

GLENN: Oh, yeah, and right now he is cursing.

SMERCONISH: He is driving toward Philly.

GLENN: He is. He is eating Cuban sandwich which I never understood and he's cursing your name. What were you supposed to call him?

SMERCONISH: Mr. Dictator.

GLENN: Yeah, that would be the polite -- seriously, when I'm with dictators, you know, in their country where I could just disappear for all time, that's what I like to do, kick rocks in their eyes.

SMERCONISH: Hey, I tell you something else about Castro. Very Internet savvy. I remember that in his personal office he had two computer terminals on the desk and he pulled out this sheath of documents, 309 pages on the day that I was there and it represented the clip service of the Americans. In other words, like he would Google every time he was referenced in the American press and it would be printed out for him. And that's how closely he would try to stay abreast of the political scene in America as it related to his leadership.

GLENN: These people are egomaniacs, though. I mean, they're total and complete egomaniacs. Have you ever heard of the guy -- what is the prince from Saudi Arabia that owns, like, 5% of CitiBank? He's really, really wealthy? He's a guy who keeps bailing us out. Didn't, not crazy enough to bail us out this time but he continues to bail us out. This guy is one of the biggest egomaniacs. When you meet with him -- first of all, he has a nervous twitch in his eyes and -- remember he owns, you know, parts of our banks. He has a nervous twitch in his eye. So he has someone bring a golden tray, no matter where he is, a golden tray of about 30 different pairs of sunglasses every 15 minutes and he picks another pair of sunglasses and replaces the one he's wearing because he always, he can be in a movie theater, he's always wearing sunglasses because it's dark -- I mean, because of his eye twitch and he doesn't want anybody to see it. And if you ever meet him, he will give you a portfolio of him that talks about all of the wives that he had and why he divorced all of those wives and why they were wrong and he was right. One guy that I know that actually sat down and met with him, the portfolio included him on the cover of Fortune magazine, except it wasn't him on Fortune. They had superimposed, cut and pasted his head on somebody else's body. It was -- he said it was the strangest thing they have ever gone through I sitting down and meeting with this guy and you're like, oh, man, this guy is crazy out of his mind.

Did you get a feeling at all that Castro was crazy?

SMERCONISH: Crazy like a fox. I'll tell you what his trick was. He had an interpreter, a woman who, she was so close to him, it's like she was in his left pocket and as the night wore on, I became convinced that he did not need her, that he relied on her as a crutch to give him an extra 30 to 60 seconds to formulate his thought process. I'm convinced that he speaks perfectly fine or understands perfectly fine English but that it's a device that he uses to try and get his head together.

GLENN: I know this is a really weird question but I have to know. Did you get your picture taken with him?

SMERCONISH: I didn't pose, but absolutely tons of pictures were taken that night including a picture where we gave to him an FDNY hat. Again this was closer in time to the events of September 11 and we asked him to put it on as a sign of solidarity on America's war on terror. We thought it would be interesting to see whether he would do it. And he did it, and that also brought a whole slew of hate mail from firefighters who thought that he had somehow been derisive toward the badge.

GLENN: Holy cow, I have to tell you, Michael Smerconish, giving him a hat, having a picture. I will always remember your name.

Okay, thanks, Mike. Thanks, Michael Smerconish.

Most self-proclaimed Marxists know very little about Marxism. Some of them have all the buzzwords memorized. They talk about the exploits of labor. They talk about the slavery of capitalist society and the alienation caused by capital. They talk about the evils of power and domination.

But they don't actually believe what they say. Or else they wouldn't be such violent hypocrites. And we're not being dramatic when we say "violent."

For them, Marxism is a political tool that they use to degrade and annoy their political enemies.

They don't actually care about the working class.

Another important thing to remember about Marxists is that they talk about how they want to defend the working class, but they don't actually understand the working class. They definitely don't realize that the working class is composed mostly of so many of the people they hate. Because, here's the thing, they don't actually care about the working class. Or the middle class. They wouldn't have the slightest clue how to actually work, not the way we do. For them, work involves ranting about how work and labor are evil.

Ironically, if their communist utopia actually arrived, they would be the first ones against the wall. Because they have nothing to offer except dissent. They have no practical use and no real connection to reality.

Again ironically, they are the ultimate proof of the success of capitalism. The fact that they can freely call for its demise, in tweets that they send from their capitalistic iPhones, is proof that capitalism affords them tremendous luxuries.

Their specialty is complaining. They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They sneer at Christianity for promising Heaven in exchange for good deeds on earth — which is a terrible description of Christianity, but it's what they actually believe — and at the same time they criticize Christianity for promising a utopia, they give their unconditional devotion to a religion that promises a utopia.

They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They think capitalism has turned us into machines. Which is a bad interpretation of Marx's concept of the General Intellect, the idea that humans are the ones who create machines, so humans, not God, are the creators.

They think that the only way to achieve the perfect society is by radically changing and even destroying the current society. It's what they mean when they say things about the "status quo" and "hegemony" and the "established order." They believe that the system is broken and the way to fix it is to destroy, destroy, destroy.

Critical race theory actually takes it a step farther. It tells us that the racist system can never be changed. That racism is the original sin that white people can never overcome. Of course, critical race theorists suggest "alternative institutions," but these "alternative institutions" are basically the same as the ones we have now, only less effective and actually racist.

Marx's violent revolution never happened. Or at least it never succeeded. Marx's followers have had to take a different approach. And now, we are living through the Revolution of Constant Whining.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.

Americans are losing faith in our justice system and the idea that legal consequences are applied equally — even to powerful elites in office.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to detail what he believes will come next with the Durham investigation, which hopefully will provide answers to the Obama FBI's alleged attempts to sabotage former President Donald Trump and his campaign years ago.

Rep. Nunes and Glenn assert that we know Trump did NOT collude with Russia, and that several members of the FBI possibly committed huge abuses of power. So, when will we see justice?

Watch the video clip below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The corporate media is doing everything it can to protect Dr. Anthony Fauci after Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) roasted him for allegedly lying to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

During an extremely heated exchange at a Senate hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Paul challenged Dr. Fauci — who, as the director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, oversees research programs at the National Institute of Health — on whether the NIH funded dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Dr. Fauci denied the claims, but as Sen. Paul knows, there are documents that prove Dr. Fauci's NIH was funding gain-of-function research in the Wuhan biolab before COVID-19 broke out in China.

On "The Glenn Beck Program," Glenn and Producer Stu Burguiere presented the proof, because Dr. Fauci's shifting defenses don't change the truth.

Watch the video clip below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Critical race theory: A special brand of evil


Part of what makes it hard for us to challenge the left is that their beliefs are complicated. We don't mean complicated in a positive way. They aren't complicated the way love is complicated. They're complicated because there's no good explanation for them, no basis in reality.

The left cannot pull their heads out of the clouds. They are stuck on romantic ideas, abstract ideas, universal ideas. They talk in theories. They see the world through ideologies. They cannot divorce themselves from their own academic fixations. And — contrary to what they believe and how they act — it's not because leftists are smarter than the rest of us. And studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country. Marx was no different. The Communist Manifesto talks about how the rise of cities "rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life."

Studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country.

Instead of admitting that they're pathological hypocrites, they tell us that we're dumb and tell us to educate ourselves. Okay, so we educate ourselves; we return with a coherent argument. Then they say, "Well, you can't actually understand what you just said unless you understand the work of this other obscure Marxist writer. So educate yourselves more."

It's basically the "No True Scotsman" fallacy, the idea that when you point out a flaw in someone's argument, they say, "Well, that's a bad example."

After a while, it becomes obvious that there is no final destination for their bread-crumb trail. Everything they say is based on something that somebody else said, which is based on something somebody else said.

Take critical race theory. We're sure you've noticed by now that it is not evidence-based — at all. It is not, as academics say, a quantitative method. It doesn't use objective facts and data to arrive at conclusions. Probably because most of those conclusions don't have any basis in reality.

Critical race theory is based on feelings. These feelings are based on theories that are also based on feelings.

We wanted to trace the history of critical race theory back to the point where its special brand of evil began. What allowed it to become the toxic, racist monster that it is today?

Later, we'll tell you about some of the snobs who created critical theory, which laid the groundwork for CRT. But if you follow the bread-crumb trail from their ideas, you wind up with Marxism.

For years, the staff has devoted a lot of time to researching Marxism. We have read a lot of Marx and Marxist writing. It's part of our promise to you to be as informed as possible, so that you know where to go for answers; so that you know what to say when your back is up against the wall. What happens when we take the bread-crumb trail back farther, past Marxism? What is it based on?

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism.

It's actually based on the work of one of the most important philosophers in human history, a 19th-century German philosopher named Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism. And, as you'll see in just a bit, if we look at Hegel's actual ideas, it's obvious that Marx completely misrepresented them in order to confirm his own fantasies.

So, in a way, that's where the bread-crumb trail ends: With Marx's misrepresentation of an incredibly important, incredibly useful philosophy, a philosophy that's actually pretty conservative.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.