Glenn Beck: Lord Monckton on Global Warming


Why Global Warming is not a global crisis. Learn more...

GORE: I think that those people are in such a tiny, tiny minority now with their point of view. They are almost like the ones who still believe that the moon landing was staged in a movie lot in Arizona.

GLENN: Wow.

GORE: And those who believe the Earth is flat.

GLENN: Right.

GORE: That demeans them a little bit, but it's not that far off.

GLENN: Yeah. That man is responsible for global warming. That's a tiny, tiny, tiny fraction of the population. 21% of the people now say that man is the most important factor causing global warming. 63%, tiny, tiny, tiny sliver of the population. 63% say man's one factor in global warming. 16% say they don't know or man has no affect. By the way, the number of those who say we didn't land on the moon is 6%. So it's almost the same thing. So there you go.

Lord Christopher Monckton has produced his own slide show documentary on the other side. It's called "Apocalypse? No!" Available at greatswindle.com right now. He is on the phone with us. This is the guy who stopped the -- spearheaded the campaign to get Al Gore's movie thrown out of the schools in England. One of the flat Earthers, if I may say. Do you believe the moon landing was fake, Lord Monckton?

LORD MONCKTON: Oh, Glenn, it was actually filmed in the Scottish Highlands. We made a fortune out of it.

GLENN: Really, that's weird.

LORD MONCKTON: Al Gore lives in a fantasy world of his own and, of course, it's he who's the flat Earther and not us because before Tolomai (ph) and Copernicus came along, the scientific consensus was near unanimous that the Earth was indeed flat apart from here in the Highlands and it was only when the scientists had another look they found the consensus of being wrong all the time. It is going to be exactly the same with global warming. There is supposed to be a consensus, actually more and more scientists --

GLENN: Here, Lord Monckton, I have to tell you. What people will say today is we have been fed a constant stream in the last three days of the and the Arctic ice shelf that has melted, proof positive global warming.

LORD MONCKTON: OH, yeah. Well, it's melting but there was an earthquake first and the most likely thing that caused this ice to crack, of course, is an earthquake and there is indeed local warming in that region of Antarctica caused by undersea volcanic activity largely. But most of Antarctica is cooling, though the newspapers somehow won't be telling you that.

GLENN: Is it true that the ice that broke off was .01% of the total ice in Antarctica and it --

LORD MONCKTON: I think you may be exaggerating slightly. And, of course, it didn't break off, either. It was in danger of breaking off and then along comes the and the architecture particular winter and all freezes it up again. So it didn't go anywhere.

GLENN: Okay. All right. What was the answer to the question that Al Gore gave last night on his $300 million ad campaign? I have the question and his answer. I want to know what was the real answer. Here's the question and answer from TV last night.

STAHL: We're told that this ad campaign is going to cost a barrel of money. How are you paying for this?

GORE: Well, Tipper and I, thank you again, have put all of the profits from the movie and the book that we would have otherwise gotten, An Inconvenient Truth, to this and --

STAHL: All the profits?

GORE: Correct, all that we would have received, absolutely.

TIPPER GORE: And not only that but, you know, there is a cash component to the Nobel Peace Prize which he was awarded, and we donated that and we matched it.

GLENN: Okay. That's about $300 million that they are going to spend on the ad campaign. If we're incredibly generous, we can say that the Gores just donated $10 million, incredibly generous. Where does the other $290 million come from for this ad campaign?

LORD MONCKTON: That, of course, is the question that she ought to have asked him and she didn't because if she had asked him, he wouldn't have agreed to the interview. On my guess is that it came from a number of sources, all of them undesirable and all of them very unfriendly to the freedoms of the West. I think the Chinese government are involved in this up to their neck. I think the Indian government. I think several Arab governments.

GLENN: Wait, wait, wait, wait. Wait, wait, wait.

LORD MONCKTON: And I also, it's quite likely that outfits like Greenpeace and the Environmental Defense Fund. Greenpeace will soon have a Navy larger than the British Navy.

GLENN: Okay. Hang on just a second. Lord Monckton, you say something like the Chinese and India are funneling money into this campaign.

LORD MONCKTON: Yeah.

GLENN: Do you have anything to back that up? That's quite the charge.

LORD MONCKTON: It is quite a charge, but it's just a very large amount of money which Gore hasn't got and nor, I think, even do Greenpeace and the Environmental Defense Fund have that kind of money. It's such a large sum that --

GLENN: So what makes you jump to India or China as opposed to --

LORD MONCKTON: India, China, Arab governments, who stands to gain? It's very simple really. Who stands to gain if Western governments close down their economies because infatuous nincompoops like Al Gore come out and say the sky's about to fall in? The answer is those countries that are trying to compete with us economically and would like to take over from us the leadership of the Western -- of the free world. And the Chinese would love to take over from us. They are already very active in Africa. They are moving in as powers move out. The Indians, of course, are also hugely expanding their economy. They are not going to be told to stop this. India and China have jointly and on several occasions announced they are not going to reduce their emissions below the per capita level that we emit and that would allow them actually to increase their emission five fold over and above what they already are. And China and India between them now account for getting over two thirds emissions worldwide. They have a huge vested interest in this. And I'm deeply suspicious of this very large amount of money that's being spent and I think that everybody should now be asking Al Gore where did this money come from, is it clean money or is it dirty money.

GLENN: Well, of course it's clean money. It's to help global warming. Lord Christopher Monckton is the guy who led the George to get Al Gore's movie removed from schools in England. Lesley Stahl apparently did an awful lot of homework for this interview and she came to the interview prepared with, you know, guns ablazing when she said, hey, there are a lot of really credible people, you know, who say they don't agree with you on the global warming business. The one name she pulled out which I think is the greatest scientist known to man is Dick Cheney.

LORD MONCKTON: (Laughing).

GLENN: I know you haven't done a lot of research on this but can you come up with a few names of some scientists that have credibility other than the scientist that we all know Dick Cheney is?

LORD MONCKTON: Well, obviously there are people like professor Richard Lindzen who is the professor of meteorologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He knows more about the atmosphere than anybody else. There's Shunichi Aksofu (ph), one of the two most cited scientists in the world in Japan who's completely against it. There are people all over the world and thousands of them now, leading scientists like Roy Spitzer and John Christy who do all the atmospheric measurements using balloons, radio signs and satellite, the Fred Singer who established the U.S. satellite weather service. I could go on and on.

GLENN: Right. Lord Monckton, the interesting thing is you never hear any of these people really quoted in anything like 60 Minutes. I mean, you would think 60 Minutes is supposed to be balanced, supposed to be fair and supposed to hit with the hard -- they always intersperse the answer to somebody who is the critic. They always do that. They go back and forth. That's what 60 Minutes is known for, except they didn't do it this time around. They just let Al Gore answer the question. Why do you suppose that is?

LORD MONCKTON: I think it's because they clearly have a political agenda and this was revealed very clearly when Lesley Stahl said in a remark which even the unspeakable BBC wouldn't have got away with that Al Gore had won the popular vote at the last general election of the United States but the Supreme Court had overturned the people's will. Now, that kind of remark indicates a very strong left wing, international left political agenda because actually a whole lot of journalists including journalists from CBS went along and got hold of the ballot paper in Florida where the dispute came from and recounted them and found the result was even stronger in favor of George Bush than the official results, which is why they never published it and never screamed about it thereafter. So for her to say that indicates that clearly she was not intending to ask any real questions of Al Gore and he, of course, would not have agreed to take part if he thought for one moment that she was going to do a propaganda job and ask real questions. That's why for more than a year he has fashioned dodged my invitation with him to debate head to head on CBS or any other television network he cares to name. He dare not do that because he knows the scientific. And Lesley Stahl, if she had begun to ask him any scientific questions, would have had him on the ropes in two seconds.

GLENN: Okay, the last question that we have time for is I just read another article again today about the ice shelf in Antarctica and it ended with, this is just, again, another result of the ocean's warming, yet NASA has -- I'm sorry. Is it NASA that just sent these out, Stu? What's the organization? Lord Monckton, you might even know. I believe it was NASA that sent the underwater robots, under the ocean floor, on the ocean floor and they have been measuring the temperature now and they say there is no ocean temperature rise. So how is there no --

LORD MONCKTON: It was done by John Lyman of NASA in 2006 and it's recently been repeated by scientists from NOAA which is another division that looks at these things and there is really no doubt the oceans have not warmed over the last five or six years at all. There has been some local warming in the region of Antarctica where this ice, Wilkins Ice Shelf is but that local warming is probably volcanic. It doesn't seem to fit in with any of the normal ocean currents or any other pattern. The oceans are, in fact, if anything slightly cooling and indeed, the weather as a whole there has been no global warming for ten years. It stopped ten years ago, in 1998. And for the last seven years temperatures globally have been falling at a main rate of around not .4 celsius, that's nearly 1 degree Fahrenheit per decade and I bet you haven't heard that on CBS.

GLENN: No, I haven't. Christopher Lord Monckton, he has produced his own documentary. It's called "Apocalypse? No!" Available at greatswindle.com. Lord Monckton, good to have you on, sir.

LORD MONCKTON: Well, thank you very much.


 

Fox News host Greg Gutfeld joined Glenn on "The Glenn Beck Podcast" this week to talk about his new book, "The Plus: Self-Help for People Who Hate Self-Help."

Greg admits he is probably the last person who should write a self-help book. Nevertheless, he offers his offbeat advice on how to save America during what has become one of the most tumultuous times in history, as well as drinking while tweeting (spoiler: don't do it).

He also shares his "evolution" on President Donald Trump, his prediction for the election, and what it means to be an agnostic-atheist.

In this clip, Greg shares what he calls his "first great epiphany" on how dangerous cancel culture has become.

"I believe that cancel culture is the first successful work-around of the First Amendment," he said. "Because freedom of speech doesn't protect me from my career being ruined, my livelihood being destroyed, or me getting so depressed I commit suicide. Cancel culture is the first successful work-around of freedom of speech. It can oppress your speech with the scepter of destruction. We don't have freedom of speech anymore."

Watch the video clip below or find the full Glenn Beck Podcast with Greg Gutfeld here.

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Use code UNMASKED to save $20 on one year of BlazeTV.

Dr. Simone Gold joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Thursday to set the record straight about hydroxychloroquine -- what it is, how it works, and the real reason for all the current controversy surrounding a centuries-old medication.

Dr. Gold is a board certified emergency physician. She graduated from Chicago Medical School before attending Stanford University Law School. She completed her residency in emergency medicine at Stony Brook University Hospital in New York, and worked in Washington D.C. for the Surgeon General, as well for the chairman of the Committee on Labor and Human Resources. She works as an emergency physician on the front lines, whether or not there is a pandemic, and her clinical work serves all Americans from urban inner city to suburban and the Native American population. Her legal practice focuses on policy issues relating to law and medicine.

She is also the founder of America's frontline doctors, a group of doctors who have been under attack this week for speaking out about hydroxychloroquine during a news conference held outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington D.C.

On the program, Dr. Gold emphasized that the controversy over hydroxychloroquine is a "complete myth."

"Hydroxychloroquine is an analogue or a derivative of quinine, which is found in tree bark. It's the most noncontroversial of medications that there is," she explained.

"It's been around for centuries and it's been FDA-approved in the modern version, called hydroxychloroquine, for 65 years. In all of that time, [doctors] used it for breast-feeding women, pregnant women, elderly, children, and immune compromised. The typical use is for years or even decades because we give it mostly to RA, rheumatoid arthritis patients and lupus patients who need to be on it, essentially, all of their life. So, we have extensive experience with it ... it's one of the most commonly used medications throughout the world."

Dr. Gold told Glenn she was surprised when the media suddenly "vomited all over hydroxychloroquine", but initially chalked it up to the left's predictable hatred for anything President Donald Trump endorses. However, when the media gave the drug Remdesivir glowing reviews, despite disappointing clinical trial results, she decided to do some research.

"[Remdesivir] certainly wasn't a fabulous drug, but the media coverage was all about how fabulous it was. At that moment, I thought that was really weird. Because it's one thing to hate hydroxychloroquine because the president [endorsed] it. But it's another thing to give a free pass to another medicine that doesn't seem that great. I thought that was really weird, so I started looking into it. And let me tell you, what I discovered was absolutely shocking," she said.

Watch the video below for more details:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

According to the mainstream media's COVID-19 narrative, the president is "ignoring" the crisis.

On tonight's "Glenn TV" special, Glenn Beck exposes the media's last four months of political theater that has helped shape America's confusion and fear over coronavirus. And now, with a new school year looming on the horizon, the ongoing hysteria has enormous ramifications for our children, but the media is working overtime to paint the Trump administration as anti-science Neanderthals who want to send children and teachers off to die by reopening schools.

Glenn fights back with the facts and interviews the medical doctor Big Tech fears the most. Dr. Simone Gold, founder of America's Frontline Doctors, stands up to the media's smear campaign and explains why she could no longer stay silent in her fight against coronavirus fear.

Watch a preview below:


In order to watch tonight's episode, you must be a BlazeTV subscriber. Join today to get a 30-day free trial, and get $20 off a one-year subscription with code UNMASKED.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

It's high time to leave the partisan politics behind and focus on the facts about face masks and whether or not they really work against COVID-19.

On the radio program Tuesday, Glenn Beck spoke with Drs. Scott Jensen and George Rutherford about the scientific evidence that proves or disproves the effectiveness of mask wearing to stop the spread of the coronavirus. Then, Dr. Karyln Borysenko joined to break down where the massive political divide over masks came from in the first place.

"I think if we were to talk about this a couple months ago, I might have said, 'Well, there's the science of masks, and there's the emotions of masks.' But, unfortunately, there's something in between," Jensen said. "I would have thought that the science of masks would have to do with the physics of masks, so I did a video a couple months ago where I talked about the pore side of a cotton mask or a surgical mask."

He explained that properly worn masks can help reduce the spread of virus particles, but cautioned against a false-sense of security when wearing a mask because they are far from providing complete protection.

"If you have a triple-ply mask, the pore size will end up being effectively five microns. And five microns, to a COVID-19 virus particle, is 50 times larger. That's approximately the same differential between the two-inch separation between the wires of a chain-link fence, and a gnat," Jensen explained.

"But now what we're seeing is if we have some collision of COVID-19 viral particles with the latticework of any mask ... if you're breathing out or breathing in and the viral particles collide with the actual latticework of a mask, I think intuitively, yes, we can reduce the amount of virus particles that are going back and forth."

Dr. Rutherford said masks are essential tools for fighting COVID-19, as long as you wear them correctly. He laid out the three main reasons he believes we should all be wearing masks.

"So, we're trying to do three things," he said. "First of all, we're trying to protect the people around you, in case you are one of the 60% of people who have asymptomatic infection and don't know it. The second thing we're trying to do is to protect you. The third thing we're trying to do is, if you get infected, you'll get infected at a lower dose, and then you're less likely to develop symptoms. That's the threefer."

Watch the video below to catch more of the conversation:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.