Glenn talks with Oliver North




American Heroes: In the Fight Against Radical Islam


by Oliver North


GLENN: Let me go to Oliver North who happens to be on the phone with us. I'll try to speak slowly to you.

LT. COLONEL NORTH: Why is that, Glenn?

GLENN: Well, I mean, you know, you apparently can't read, I guess.

LT. COLONEL NORTH: Well, apparently because I was in the armed force of the United States, quoting to Stephen King where just as part of this -- sounds remarkably like what John Kerry said.

GLENN: Isn't that amazing?

LT. COLONEL NORTH: When he was running for President. It's almost like they write this, they had the same script writer.

GLENN: Well, you know what it is? It must be so frustrating to you because we were talking about this earlier. I have yet to meet, and I'm sure there are, but I have yet to meet the idiot that is in our armed forces. I have never met a single soldier, sailor, airman, nobody that I thought, oh, jeez, I can't believe this guy has a gun.

LT. COLONEL NORTH: You know, Glenn, and you and I have both traveled around this country. We've met a lot of people and I'm now out on my book tour and you've been on yours, same guy set them both up. We'll I'm sure see a lot of the same people. The reality of it is that today's military -- and I'm very proud of the guys that I served with as a young marine in Vietnam, the guys that kept me alive for, you know, the whole time that I was over there in two trips to Vietnam. But today's military, soldiers, sailors, airmen, guardsmen and Marines, are the brightest, best educated, now best trained and equipped military of any country at any time in history. Average education in today's enlisted ranks is 13 1/2 years. I was in Columbus, Ohio and Middleton, Ohio earlier this week and I met two U.S. army recruiters. One is a sergeant first class, the other one is a sergeant, both veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan, both now on recruiting duty. And they jokingly say it's tougher being on recruiting duty and they will tell you, they said, we want you to meet some of the 14 guys that we have shipped this month. Now, that's recruiting vernacular for the guys who signed up and are about to go on active duty. 14 graduates, 14 graduates of high school minimum, 10 of whom they said are graduates of two-year institutions. In other words, they have an associate degree in a community college. And I said, well, what about the other four? And the sergeant first class smiled and says, they were all graduates of Ohio State. In other words, college graduates who were headed off to become enlisted soldiers because they want to serve their country. Idiots like King who probably wouldn't know a military guy if they tripped over him or guys like Jim McDermott who made a similar comment last week out there in Washington's very liberal Seattle or guys like John Kerry or people like the New York Times who write they are nothing but poor kids from Mississippi, Texas and Alabama, Lord knows why they picked those three states, don't get it. And the reason they done get it, Glenn, is because they haven't spent any time with them. They don't know who they are.

GLENN: Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North. His book is released today. It's "American Heroes: In the Fight Against Radical Islam." You know, I listen to these people and it really is like there is two Americas. There is the America that I grew up in and, you know, you grew up in and that one had the change in the 1960s where all of a sudden our heroes became baby killers and everything else. They promised that we wouldn't do it again. They are not calling anybody a baby killer. Now they're just calling them stupid.

LT. COLONEL NORTH: Yeah. Well, and of course we've had politicians accuse them of premeditated murder. McDermott said the other day out in California that they were mercenaries. We've seen the commanding officer derided as General Betrayus. An unprecedented act, by the way. Even during what we in Virginia called the war of recent northern regression, there were union generals who were pilloried but never like this. You think about the attack on these young men, and I can only conclude that it is people like all of these ones that we've just referred to who don't want us to win a war that is eminently winnable against radical column, that you will I want to conclude, who want to demoralize the troops, denigrate the commanding officer, who say the commanding officer is something beneath them and that's what they basically set out to do, to try to guarantee in one fashion or another that this war is not the victory we need it to be.

GLENN: So how does the country -- and I know you talk about this in the book. How does the country win against one of its -- one of the most dedicated enemies we've ever faced?

LT. COLONEL NORTH: You are absolutely right about that.

GLENN: How do we win a war when the media is against the soldiers, the liberal elite is against the soldiers, much of congress and politicians are against the soldiers. I mean, they will say that, oh, no, we love the soldiers but then they are really not.

LT. COLONEL NORTH: I tell people, I say -- and I had this debate with Alan Colmes last night on Hannity and Colmes. When you've got somebody that says, I support the troops; I just don't support their mission. I say, try this. When you go home tonight, tell your spouse that you really love her and then in the next breath tell her, "But I don't like the way you keep the house, I don't like the way you're raising the kids, I don't particularly like the way you make love," and find out where you sleep. The fact is you can't say "I support the troops" and don't support the reason we have troops. The reason we have troops is to defend this country, in this case against one of the most vicious adversaries we have ever faced. It's one thing to take on an enemy that's willing to die for their comrades or their cause. It is something else to take on an enemy that intends to die in the process of killing you.

GLENN: Are you frustrated at all --

LT. COLONEL NORTH: Oh, I'm terribly frustrated.

GLENN: Are you frustrated all that people don't -- for instance, Hollywood, I mean, Lone Survivor is now being made into a movie, but Hollywood just won't go there, and there are amazing stories about our troops.

LT. COLONEL NORTH: Yeah. Black Hawk Down was a very successful movie, but ultimately when you get -- when you peel the onion back on Black Hawk Down -- and they couldn't help but show the remarkable heroism from the spec ops guys and the Rangers in what happened in 1993 in Somalia. But ultimately the reason why that movie got funded -- probably didn't turn out quite the way they originally intended but it shows how heroic those guys were but the reason why they made it was because it was a defeat. And Saving Private Ryan is a wonderful movie but in fact it's fictitious. You know what, you don't have to be fictitious. If you read the -- every one of the pictures in this book, American Heroes, none of them are staged. All of them are the real thing. The stories are their stories. I just happened to be there with a camera. I'm the guy that gets to hang around with heroes for a living.

GLENN: I tell you what, Oliver North, if you don't mind hanging on for just a second.

LT. COLONEL NORTH: I'll do so Glenn.

GLENN: Because I've got to ask you something that you're getting hammered for in the media here on Jeremiah Wright. The name of the book is "American Heroes." It's out today. Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North.

GLENN: Indiana and North Carolina going to the voting polls today. We'll see what happens. We'll be watching it tonight with you, 7:00, CNN Headline Prime, don't miss it. Oliver North from the Fox News Channel and author of "American Heroes: In the Fight Against Radical Islam." The national release is today. He is out on the road and he's with us now. Lieutenant Colonel, tell me about the statement that you made about Jeremiah Wright. I know people are hammering for saying that Jeremiah Wright is a recruiting campaign for Al-Qaeda and all the enemies of America.

LT. COLONEL NORTH: Well, he is. By virtue of what he has been saying -- and this all began here a week or so ago, not just going after me by name for Lord knows what reason but what he has become is an incitement for people to say I'm disgusted with America, I hate America. And as he said, he damned America. What this man is doing is creating an environment where already disaffected young people -- and there are a lot of them, particularly in prisons -- and many of them are minorities, are falling into the hands of people like Louis Farrakhan who can then turn them over to radical Imams and further their process of indoctrination into radical Islam. Now, Al-Qaeda just happens to be one manifestation of it. We've certainly seen in Iraq where it doesn't have to be Al-Qaeda. It could be a Shiite militia, it could be theocrats in Tehran that are directing the special groups that are operating all over the southern part of Iraq trying to deny the Iraqis the opportunity to develop their oil resources. Those are the kinds of things. You've got an American as promise then as Jeremiah Wright who, by the way, did serve as a United States marine but has apparently forgotten the motto of the United States Marine Corps: Semper Fidelis, always faithful.

GLENN: I want to play a clip from Rosie O'Donnell because she said she understood Reverend Wright. I want to get your opinion on this. Listen to this, Rosie O'Donnell yesterday.

O'DONNELL: Well, did you see Bill Moyers recently give a speech about what happened after Reverend Wright was on his show?

VOICE: No.

O'DONNELL: He got thousands of e-mails, over like 5,000 e-mails and some of them irate, some of them understanding but what it came to boil down to in his mind is the fact that, you know, this man is Following a tradition of black preachers and that there is a righteous indignation about people who are only considered 3/4 of a person until fairly recently in history and that his anger which annoys some and forces some to look at issues that America is not really ready to face is the actual issue, that racism does exist in this country and it's still thriving and that some of the things that Jeremiah Wright says he's held accountable for and -- not Oprah, Obama's held accountable for but there are things that white preachers have said that are just as insane.

VOICE: All them should be held accountable.

O'DONNELL: That Pat Robertson is saying, that gays and feminists are responsible.

VOICE: So you agree they should all be held accountable.

O'DONNELL: I think there is a place in the world, an inspirational, liberational kind of preaching that Reverend Wright says. When you read that he says, I was not as offended in the people in the polls read. Frankly it made sense to me. I totally understood what he was saying.

GLENN: What do you think of that?

LT. COLONEL NORTH: Well, you know, obviously Rosie O'Donnell, Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama, you know, if you believe what they say, the United States government started the HIV virus, the United States government's responsible for 9/11. I mean, there's a grand conspiracy theory that pervades the left in this country and unfortunately they've achieved remarkable prominence that they don't deserve. And what it does is it distracts us from people like the American heroes that are in this book. And what's so disappointing to me is the ones who really deserve the attention and the accolades rarely get it from our media.

GLENN: How difficult -- because I -- you know, the conspiracy theory is growing in this country that the United States military pulled off the 9/11 attack.

LT. COLONEL NORTH: Yeah.

GLENN: And I find it so awful and also so ridiculous that think that our government could keep that a secret.

LT. COLONEL NORTH: Well, of course. I mean, this is a government that can't keep -- you know, once two people know about it, it's sure to leak. I mean, it would have been published -- the guys that were involved in the conspiracy would have stepped forward to the Washington compost or the New York crimes or the Atlantic journal and constipation and it would be all over the press. I frequently tell people the enemy doesn't need an intelligence service against us. All they have to do is subscribe to America's newspapers, watch the mainstream media. We have to go out and collect information against guys who have learned, thanks to them, by the way, thanks to the media, that we were listening to their cell phone and satellite telephone communications. We have to go out and try to penetrate cells of terrorists who have been inculcated since they were little children in hatred, how to kill and how to die and try to do that under strictures that were so difficult that you couldn't even talk until very recently, this administration changed the rules for the CIA so you could actually talk to somebody who might have a criminal record. Think about the mind of somebody that says our government could somehow make the passengers on those four airplanes disappear or somehow invectored those airplanes into two great buildings in New York City and the Pentagon's west wall and a farmer's field in Somerset county, Pennsylvania.

GLENN: Ronald Reagan called him an American hero, he is a New York Times best selling author, syndicated columnist, he does war stories on the Fox News Channel. More importantly, a Vietnam veteran awarded the silver star, the bronze star and two purple hearts during his 22 years of service with the U.S. Marine Corps. Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North has a book out now. It's called "American Heroes: In the Fight Against Radical Islam." It is a real pleasure, sir.

LT. COLONEL NORTH: Glenn, I appreciate it.

GLENN: You bet.

LT. COLONEL NORTH: And for all your listeners around the country who want to learn more about the book tour, go to Americanheroesbook.com. It's all there and I appreciate the chance for you to tell their story.

GLENN: Talk to you again, Oliver.

From the moment the 33-year-old Thomas Jefferson arrived at the Continental Congress in Philadelphia in 1776, he was on the radical side. That caused John Adams to like him immediately. Then the Congress stuck Jefferson and Adams together on the five-man committee to write a formal statement justifying a break with Great Britain, and their mutual admiration society began.

Jefferson thought Adams should write the Declaration. But Adams protested, saying, “It can't come from me because I'm obnoxious and disliked." Adams reasoned that Jefferson was not obnoxious or disliked, therefore he should write it. Plus, he flattered Jefferson, by telling him he was a great writer. It was a master class in passing the buck.

So, over the next 17 days, Jefferson holed up in his room, applying his lawyer skills to the ideas of the Enlightenment. He borrowed freely from existing documents like the Virginia Declaration of Rights. He later wrote that “he was not striving for originality of principle or sentiment." Instead, he hoped his words served as “an expression of the American mind."

It's safe to say he achieved his goal.

The five-man committee changed about 25 percent of Jefferson's first draft of the Declaration before submitting it to Congress. Then, Congress altered about one-fifth of that draft. But most of the final Declaration's words are Jefferson's, including the most famous passage — the Preamble — which Congress left intact. The result is nothing less than America's mission statement, the words that ultimately bind the nation together. And words that we desperately need to rediscover because of our boiling partisan rage.

The Declaration is brilliant in structure and purpose. It was designed for multiple audiences: the King of Great Britain, the colonists, and the world. And it was designed for multiple purposes: rallying the troops, gaining foreign allies, and announcing the creation of a new country.

The Declaration is structured in five sections: the Introduction, Preamble, the Body composed of two parts, and the Conclusion. It's basically the most genius breakup letter ever written.

In the Introduction, step 1 is the notificationI think we need to break up. And to be fair, I feel I owe you an explanation...

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another…

The Continental Congress felt they were entitled by “the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God" to “dissolve the political bands," but they needed to prove the legitimacy of their cause. They were defying the world's most powerful nation and needed to motivate foreign allies to join the effort. So, they set their struggle within the entire “Course of human events." They're saying, this is no petty political spat — this is a major event in world history.

Step 2 is declaring what you believe in, your standardsHere's what I'm looking for in a healthy relationship...

This is the most famous part of the Declaration; the part school children recite — the Preamble:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That's as much as many Americans know of the Declaration. But the Preamble is the DNA of our nation, and it really needs to be taken as a whole:

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

The Preamble takes us through a logical progression: All men are created equal; God gives all humans certain inherent rights that cannot be denied; these include the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; to protect those rights, we have governments set up; but when a government fails to protect our inherent rights, people have the right to change or replace it.

Government is only there to protect the rights of mankind. They don't have any power unless we give it to them. That was an extraordinarily radical concept then and we're drifting away from it now.

The Preamble is the justification for revolution. But note how they don't mention Great Britain yet. And again, note how they frame it within a universal context. These are fundamental principles, not just squabbling between neighbors. These are the principles that make the Declaration just as relevant today. It's not just a dusty parchment that applied in 1776.

Step 3 is laying out your caseHere's why things didn't work out between us. It's not me, it's you...

This is Part 1 of the Body of the Declaration. It's the section where Jefferson gets to flex his lawyer muscles by listing 27 grievances against the British crown. This is the specific proof of their right to rebellion:

He has obstructed the administration of justice...

For imposing taxes on us without our consent...

For suspending our own legislatures...

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us...

Again, Congress presented these “causes which impel them to separation" in universal terms to appeal to an international audience. It's like they were saying, by joining our fight you'll be joining mankind's overall fight against tyranny.

Step 4 is demonstrating the actions you took I really tried to make this relationship work, and here's how...

This is Part 2 of the Body. It explains how the colonists attempted to plead their case directly to the British people, only to have the door slammed in their face:

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury...

They too have been deaf to the voice of justice... We must, therefore... hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

This basically wrapped up America's argument for independence — we haven't been treated justly, we tried to talk to you about it, but since you refuse to listen and things are only getting worse, we're done here.

Step 5 is stating your intent — So, I think it's best if we go our separate ways. And my decision is final...

This is the powerful Conclusion. If people know any part of the Declaration besides the Preamble, this is it:

...that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved...

They left no room for doubt. The relationship was over, and America was going to reboot, on its own, with all the rights of an independent nation.

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

The message was clear — this was no pitchfork mob. These were serious men who had carefully thought through the issues before taking action. They were putting everything on the line for this cause.

The Declaration of Independence is a landmark in the history of democracy because it was the first formal statement of a people announcing their right to choose their own government. That seems so obvious to us now, but in 1776 it was radical and unprecedented.

In 1825, Jefferson wrote that the purpose of the Declaration was “not to find out new principles, or new arguments, never before thought of… but to place before mankind the common sense of the subject, in terms so plain and firm… to justify ourselves in the independent stand we are compelled to take."

You're not going to do better than the Declaration of Independence. Sure, it worked as a means of breaking away from Great Britain, but its genius is that its principles of equality, inherent rights, and self-government work for all time — as long as we actually know and pursue those principles.

On June 7, 1776, the Second Continental Congress met in Philadelphia at the Pennsylvania State House, better known today as Independence Hall. Virginia delegate Richard Henry Lee introduced a motion calling for the colonies' independence. The “Lee Resolution" was short and sweet:

Resolved, That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States, that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved.

Intense debate followed, and the Congress voted 7 to 5 (with New York abstaining) to postpone a vote on Lee's Resolution. They called a recess for three weeks. In the meantime, the delegates felt they needed to explain what they were doing in writing. So, before the recess, they appointed a five-man committee to come up with a formal statement justifying a break with Great Britain. They appointed two men from New England — Roger Sherman and John Adams; two from the middle colonies — Robert Livingston and Benjamin Franklin; and one Southerner — Thomas Jefferson. The responsibility for writing what would become the Declaration of Independence fell to Jefferson.

In the rotunda of the National Archives building in Washington, D.C., there are three original documents on permanent display: the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence. These are the three pillars of the United States, yet America barely seems to know them anymore. We need to get reacquainted — quickly.

In a letter to his friend John Adams in 1816, Jefferson wrote: “I like the dreams of the future, better than the history of the past."

America used to be a forward-looking nation of dreamers. We still are in spots, but the national attitude that we hear broadcast loudest across media is not looking toward the future with optimism and hope. In late 2017, a national poll found 59% of Americans think we are currently at the “lowest point in our nation's history that they can remember."

America spends far too much time looking to the past for blame and excuse. And let's be honest, even the Right is often more concerned with “owning the left" than helping point anyone toward the practical principles of the Declaration of Independence. America has clearly lost touch with who we are as a nation. We have a national identity crisis.

The Declaration of Independence is America's thesis statement, and without it America doesn't exist.

It is urgent that we get reacquainted with the Declaration of Independence because postmodernism would have us believe that we've evolved beyond the America of our founding documents, and thus they're irrelevant to the present and the future. But the Declaration of Independence is America's thesis statement, and without it America doesn't exist.

Today, much of the nation is so addicted to partisan indignation that "day-to-day" indignation isn't enough to feed the addiction. So, we're reaching into America's past to help us get our fix. In 2016, Democrats in the Louisiana state legislature tabled a bill that would have required fourth through sixth graders to recite the opening lines of the Declaration. They didn't table it because they thought it would be too difficult or too patriotic. They tabled it because the requirement would include the phrase “all men are created equal" and the progressives in the Louisiana legislature didn't want the children to have to recite a lie. Representative Barbara Norton said, “One thing that I do know is, all men are not created equal. When I think back in 1776, July the fourth, African Americans were slaves. And for you to bring a bill to request that our children will recite the Declaration, I think it's a little bit unfair to us. To ask our children to recite something that's not the truth. And for you to ask those children to repeat the Declaration stating that all men's are free. I think that's unfair."

Remarkable — an elected representative saying it wouldn't be fair for students to have to recite the Declaration because “all men are not created equal." Another Louisiana Democrat explained that the government born out of the Declaration “was used against races of people." I guess they missed that part in school where they might have learned that the same government later made slavery illegal and amended the Constitution to guarantee all men equal protection under the law. The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments were an admission of guilt by the nation regarding slavery, and an effort to right the wrongs.

Yet, the progressive logic goes something like this: many of the men who signed the Declaration of Independence, including Thomas Jefferson who wrote it, owned slaves; slavery is evil; therefore, the Declaration of Independence is not valid because it was created by evil slave owners.

It's a sad reality that the left has a very hard time appreciating the universal merits of the Declaration of Independence because they're so hung up on the long-dead issue of slavery. And just to be clear — because people love to take things out of context — of course slavery was horrible. Yes, it is a total stain on our history. But defending the Declaration of Independence is not an effort to excuse any aspect of slavery.

Okay then, people might say, how could the Founders approve the phrase “All men are created equal," when many of them owned slaves? How did they miss that?

They didn't miss it. In fact, Thomas Jefferson included an anti-slavery passage in his first draft of the Declaration. The paragraph blasted King George for condoning slavery and preventing the American Colonies from passing legislation to ban slavery:

He has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights to life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating and carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere... Determined to keep open a market where men should be bought and sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce.

We don't say “execrable" that much anymore. It means, utterly detestable, abominable, abhorrent — basically very bad.

Jefferson was upset when Georgia and North Carolina threw up the biggest resistance to that paragraph. Ultimately, those two states twisted Congress' arm to delete the paragraph.

Still, how could a man calling the slave trade “execrable" be a slaveowner himself? No doubt about it, Jefferson was a flawed human being. He even had slaves from his estate in Virginia attending him while he was in Philadelphia, in the very apartment where he was writing the Declaration.

Many of the Southern Founders deeply believed in the principles of the Declaration yet couldn't bring themselves to upend the basis of their livelihood. By 1806, Virginia law made it more difficult for slave owners to free their slaves, especially if the owner had significant debts as Jefferson did.

At the same time, the Founders were not idiots. They understood the ramifications of signing on to the principles described so eloquently in the Declaration. They understood that logically, slavery would eventually have to be abolished in America because it was unjust, and the words they were committing to paper said as much. Remember, John Adams was on the committee of five that worked on the Declaration and he later said that the Revolution would never be complete until the slaves were free.

Also, the same generation that signed the Declaration started the process of abolition by banning the importation of slaves in 1807. Jefferson was President at the time and he urged Congress to pass the law.

America has an obvious road map that, as a nation, we're not consulting often enough.

The Declaration took a major step toward crippling the institution of slavery. It made the argument for the first time about the fundamental rights of all humans which completely undermined slavery. Planting the seeds to end slavery is not nearly commendable enough for leftist critics, but you can't discount the fact that the seeds were planted. It's like they started an expiration clock for slavery by approving the Declaration. Everything that happened almost a century later to end slavery, and then a century after that with the Civil Rights movement, flowed from the principles voiced in the Declaration.

Ironically for a movement that calls itself progressive, it is obsessed with retrying and judging the past over and over. Progressives consider this a better use of time than actually putting past abuses in the rearview and striving not to be defined by ancestral failures.

It can be very constructive to look to the past, but not when it's used to flog each other in the present. Examining history is useful in providing a road map for the future. And America has an obvious road map that, as a nation, we're not consulting often enough. But it's right there, the original, under glass. The ink is fading, but the words won't die — as long as we continue to discuss them.

'Good Morning Texas' gives exclusive preview of Mercury One museum

Screen shot from Good Morning Texas

Mercury One is holding a special exhibition over the 4th of July weekend, using hundreds of artifacts, documents and augmented reality experiences to showcase the history of slavery — including slavery today — and a path forward. Good Morning Texas reporter Paige McCoy Smith went through the exhibit for an exclusive preview with Mercury One's chief operating officer Michael Little on Tuesday.

Watch the video below to see the full preview.

Click here to purchase tickets to the museum (running from July 4 - 7).

Over the weekend, journalist Andy Ngo and several other apparent right-leaning people were brutally beaten by masked-gangs of Antifa protesters in Portland, Oregon. Short for "antifascist," Antifa claims to be fighting for social justice and tolerance — by forcibly and violently silencing anyone with opposing opinions. Ngo, who was kicked, punched, and sprayed with an unknown substance, is currently still in the hospital with a "brain bleed" as a result of the savage attack. Watch the video to get the details from Glenn.