Glenn Beck: Chairmen Barack


CHANGE


"We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times ... and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK," Obama said.

GLENN:  I'm hanging up the phone.  Barack Obama had this to say in a speech in Oregon this weekend.  He said we can drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and we can keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times.  Oh, I'm sorry.  No.  He said we can't do any of those things.  That sucks.  Man!  He said then we can -- if we drive our SUVs and keep our homes at 72 degrees all the time, we can't just expect other countries to say, "Oh, that's okay," because that's not leadership.  Excuse me.  He's says can't keep -- hang on just a second.  Can't keep -- (mumbling).  Good, good, it's at 64.  As long as it is not 72, I'm okay.  I'm a patriot.  I got the studio in here at 64 degrees.  Just the way I like it.  I'm thinking about opening up the windows just to warm it up a bit in here.  What's the temperature outside, Stu?

STU:  I can find that out for you.  Hold on.

GLENN:  Find out, would you?  That guy just -- I don't even know if it's going to be hotter or colder outside.  I'm just going to open up the window.  There we go.  Nice.  Oh, yeah.  A little warmer outside.  Hang on just a second.  I've got to go to the other side of the room.  There we go.  Set in thermometer in here at 62 and open up the window.

STU:  Well, Glenn, with all this global warming here in Manhattan, we are at 52 degrees outside.

GLENN:  52?

STU:  Yeah.

GLENN:  I better open up both windows and turn the heat on.

STU:  Yeah.

GLENN:  Adam?  Can you just get in the SUV and drive around for a while?  Just drive around for a while.  Sarah, I want you to go downstairs and get a McGriddle for me.  I don't know how I'm going to be able to do this.  I don't know how I'm going to be able to do this program today without a McGriddle and the SUV driving around the block and the windows open and the heat on.  Definitely not at 72 degrees, though, because Obama doesn't like it.  Because that's not leadership.  He said that's not leadership.  And boy, let me tell you something -- I don't know what that was.


You know what, can I ask you a question, Dan?  Why do I have, why do I have the sweat hotel on?  Why do I --

STU:  He shares our studio.  I don't know why.

GLENN:  Why does he -- he shares your studio, not my studio.  He uses your control room.

STU:  Mr. Computer expert, the same computer you are touching is -- stop it.

GLENN:  How do I get it back up to mine?

STU:  Just stop pressing buttons.  Let Dan fix it, for God sake.  You don't know what you're doing.  All you are doing is screwing up the entire network.

GLENN:  Comrades!

STU:  Yes, comrade!

GLENN:  Good news from the Western front.  Chairman Barack is using his hallucinogenic powers to make people think that they are evil for eating too much.  They're evil for being warm and driving cars that are just a little bigger than the cars they already pollute the Earth with.  Oh, just imagine how efficient we can be when we have federal control of the thermostats.  We can use the state-controlled media to alert regions which nights they will need extra blankets.  "Attention, it's an extra blanket night.  Carry on, patriots.  Throw on an extra blanket.  Grandma may freeze to death, but she's doing it for the state."  Oh, and then no more SUVs.  If the plan keeps going this well, comrade, eventually people will hate life so much, they won't drive anywhere, thus they'll kill themselves and we can reduce the cost of Social Security benefits.  Oh, and we've already prepared them for the food shortages by telling them it's not right to eat as much as you want.  Oh, the plan is going faster than ever.  Oh, it's so great.  Chairman Barack, I salute you.  It's always 72 degrees in my heart for you, but in the winter it's always about 52.  In the summer it's a nice comfortable 101, right here, for comrade Barack.

Gee.  I hope -- you know what?  Arghhh!  Since when did we become the country, when did we become the country, "Boy, we better not eat anymore."  I mean, don't get me wrong.  I mean, have you looked at us?  Woof.  But when was that the solution?  We better not eat what we want?  I'm sorry.  Are we all out of farmland?  This is incredible.  The ridiculousness of Obama's rhetoric.  I used to think the people would see how ridiculous this was and they would start to distance themselves from it.  The exact opposite is happening.  In your right mind, conservative or liberal, would you ever thought that someone would cheer at, "Hey, we better not keep our houses at 72 degrees.  We can eat as much as we want."  And they cheer?  "Oh, yeah, Glenn, but they're just -- I mean, he is just trying to give us advice on how to live a greener life.  What's wrong with that?"  Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.  Yeah, yeah.  Greener life.

Let me ask you a question.  You think Barack Obama is for a bigger or smaller government?  "See, I know what you're doing here.  I think this is a trap."  No, no, it's not a trap.  It's just Barack's actions and words.  He is the most liberal senator in the Senate.  "Yeah, he's for big kids.  You know, big oil, big kids.  He loves the kids.  That's who he's for, the kids.  He loves kids, oh, kids, kids, kids.  Even goats that are babies, he loves them, too.  More school for kids, the goat kind.  Better schools for the kid kid kind.  You know what I'm saying?"  He thinks the government can do it better than you can.  The government doesn't do anything right!  I love these people who are not doing enough.  "Oh, the government has failed us, the government has done this."  Let's make it bigger.  Let's make it fuller.  I don't even understand it.  It's like you hired some kid who's in a nasty car accident has severe mental damage and then beat himself some more -- you know, another 20 points off his IQ just beating himself with a shovel and then you hire him.  He can't do the job at all and you're like, I don't want this CEO, he can't do the job.  And the frightening part is he's not going to stop at suggestions.  "You know, if we could just federally control your thermometer."  He's not going to stop at that.  He's just proposing things somewhere that forces us to stop driving our SUVs.  Stop being able to eat as much as we want, control our thermostat.  You should be frightened because I'm not making this up.  If you think this is just conservative fearmongering, I invite you to read the news about California.  California trying to get control of people's thermostats!  It's already happened.  And people out in California like, (toking sounds), sounds like a really good idea.  Luckily there's still some people throughout with common sense.  Turns out that even the environmentalist nut jobs in the people's Republic of California like to be warm and cozy in their own homes when they set the thermostat at whatever temperature they like.  They actually proposed having the government be able to control your thermostat!  Well, that's great.  Pretty soon I could just go poo-poo in my pants and they'll come and change me, too.  "Oh, Glennie stinky, can a senator come and change me?"  .

You know the other thing that bothers me is he cares about how much other countries -- what they think about us.  I talked to a friend who was just in South Africa.  He said he was about -- he swears, about every 100 yards there's an Obama poster.  Why?  Do they vote in South Africa, can they vote in our elections?  I mean, we found out last week the Palestinians have a phone bank for Barack Obama.  And you know what?  It doesn't bother me.  I don't mind having a popular President.  But name the popular President that has been so great with Europe that our enemies were afraid of?  I'm sorry.  It's not a popularity contest.  We're running our country.  Who cares what other people think about us?  As long as we're being responsible human beings.  How about we just keep trying to be the best country on the planet, let everybody else wallow in their inferiority complex or whatever.  We're never going to achieve continued greatness in this country if we try to be like other countries.  It can't happen!  Other countries are all trying to be like us.  In case you haven't noticed, most countries are moving away from the Marxist utopia society mostly because it hasn't worked anywhere ever in the history of mankind.  They are making a beeline for capitalism.  Meanwhile we're buying blankets.  Stock up on food.  Put it in the back of your SUV while you can because choices like those aren't going to be around much longer.  We'll be standing in line for Barack toilet paper soon.  Well, I won't be.  But a senator will be because he's got to change Glennie's poopies.  Glennie's got stinky poopies in his pants.

Jeez.  Can you imagine what a bad job the government would do changing diapers?  Tape's bad for the environment; we're going to staple these on you.

From the moment the 33-year-old Thomas Jefferson arrived at the Continental Congress in Philadelphia in 1776, he was on the radical side. That caused John Adams to like him immediately. Then the Congress stuck Jefferson and Adams together on the five-man committee to write a formal statement justifying a break with Great Britain, and their mutual admiration society began.

Jefferson thought Adams should write the Declaration. But Adams protested, saying, “It can't come from me because I'm obnoxious and disliked." Adams reasoned that Jefferson was not obnoxious or disliked, therefore he should write it. Plus, he flattered Jefferson, by telling him he was a great writer. It was a master class in passing the buck.

So, over the next 17 days, Jefferson holed up in his room, applying his lawyer skills to the ideas of the Enlightenment. He borrowed freely from existing documents like the Virginia Declaration of Rights. He later wrote that “he was not striving for originality of principle or sentiment." Instead, he hoped his words served as “an expression of the American mind."

It's safe to say he achieved his goal.

The five-man committee changed about 25 percent of Jefferson's first draft of the Declaration before submitting it to Congress. Then, Congress altered about one-fifth of that draft. But most of the final Declaration's words are Jefferson's, including the most famous passage — the Preamble — which Congress left intact. The result is nothing less than America's mission statement, the words that ultimately bind the nation together. And words that we desperately need to rediscover because of our boiling partisan rage.

The Declaration is brilliant in structure and purpose. It was designed for multiple audiences: the King of Great Britain, the colonists, and the world. And it was designed for multiple purposes: rallying the troops, gaining foreign allies, and announcing the creation of a new country.

The Declaration is structured in five sections: the Introduction, Preamble, the Body composed of two parts, and the Conclusion. It's basically the most genius breakup letter ever written.

In the Introduction, step 1 is the notificationI think we need to break up. And to be fair, I feel I owe you an explanation...

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another…

The Continental Congress felt they were entitled by “the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God" to “dissolve the political bands," but they needed to prove the legitimacy of their cause. They were defying the world's most powerful nation and needed to motivate foreign allies to join the effort. So, they set their struggle within the entire “Course of human events." They're saying, this is no petty political spat — this is a major event in world history.

Step 2 is declaring what you believe in, your standardsHere's what I'm looking for in a healthy relationship...

This is the most famous part of the Declaration; the part school children recite — the Preamble:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That's as much as many Americans know of the Declaration. But the Preamble is the DNA of our nation, and it really needs to be taken as a whole:

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

The Preamble takes us through a logical progression: All men are created equal; God gives all humans certain inherent rights that cannot be denied; these include the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; to protect those rights, we have governments set up; but when a government fails to protect our inherent rights, people have the right to change or replace it.

Government is only there to protect the rights of mankind. They don't have any power unless we give it to them. That was an extraordinarily radical concept then and we're drifting away from it now.

The Preamble is the justification for revolution. But note how they don't mention Great Britain yet. And again, note how they frame it within a universal context. These are fundamental principles, not just squabbling between neighbors. These are the principles that make the Declaration just as relevant today. It's not just a dusty parchment that applied in 1776.

Step 3 is laying out your caseHere's why things didn't work out between us. It's not me, it's you...

This is Part 1 of the Body of the Declaration. It's the section where Jefferson gets to flex his lawyer muscles by listing 27 grievances against the British crown. This is the specific proof of their right to rebellion:

He has obstructed the administration of justice...

For imposing taxes on us without our consent...

For suspending our own legislatures...

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us...

Again, Congress presented these “causes which impel them to separation" in universal terms to appeal to an international audience. It's like they were saying, by joining our fight you'll be joining mankind's overall fight against tyranny.

Step 4 is demonstrating the actions you took I really tried to make this relationship work, and here's how...

This is Part 2 of the Body. It explains how the colonists attempted to plead their case directly to the British people, only to have the door slammed in their face:

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury...

They too have been deaf to the voice of justice... We must, therefore... hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

This basically wrapped up America's argument for independence — we haven't been treated justly, we tried to talk to you about it, but since you refuse to listen and things are only getting worse, we're done here.

Step 5 is stating your intent — So, I think it's best if we go our separate ways. And my decision is final...

This is the powerful Conclusion. If people know any part of the Declaration besides the Preamble, this is it:

...that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved...

They left no room for doubt. The relationship was over, and America was going to reboot, on its own, with all the rights of an independent nation.

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

The message was clear — this was no pitchfork mob. These were serious men who had carefully thought through the issues before taking action. They were putting everything on the line for this cause.

The Declaration of Independence is a landmark in the history of democracy because it was the first formal statement of a people announcing their right to choose their own government. That seems so obvious to us now, but in 1776 it was radical and unprecedented.

In 1825, Jefferson wrote that the purpose of the Declaration was “not to find out new principles, or new arguments, never before thought of… but to place before mankind the common sense of the subject, in terms so plain and firm… to justify ourselves in the independent stand we are compelled to take."

You're not going to do better than the Declaration of Independence. Sure, it worked as a means of breaking away from Great Britain, but its genius is that its principles of equality, inherent rights, and self-government work for all time — as long as we actually know and pursue those principles.

On June 7, 1776, the Second Continental Congress met in Philadelphia at the Pennsylvania State House, better known today as Independence Hall. Virginia delegate Richard Henry Lee introduced a motion calling for the colonies' independence. The “Lee Resolution" was short and sweet:

Resolved, That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States, that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved.

Intense debate followed, and the Congress voted 7 to 5 (with New York abstaining) to postpone a vote on Lee's Resolution. They called a recess for three weeks. In the meantime, the delegates felt they needed to explain what they were doing in writing. So, before the recess, they appointed a five-man committee to come up with a formal statement justifying a break with Great Britain. They appointed two men from New England — Roger Sherman and John Adams; two from the middle colonies — Robert Livingston and Benjamin Franklin; and one Southerner — Thomas Jefferson. The responsibility for writing what would become the Declaration of Independence fell to Jefferson.

In the rotunda of the National Archives building in Washington, D.C., there are three original documents on permanent display: the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence. These are the three pillars of the United States, yet America barely seems to know them anymore. We need to get reacquainted — quickly.

In a letter to his friend John Adams in 1816, Jefferson wrote: “I like the dreams of the future, better than the history of the past."

America used to be a forward-looking nation of dreamers. We still are in spots, but the national attitude that we hear broadcast loudest across media is not looking toward the future with optimism and hope. In late 2017, a national poll found 59% of Americans think we are currently at the “lowest point in our nation's history that they can remember."

America spends far too much time looking to the past for blame and excuse. And let's be honest, even the Right is often more concerned with “owning the left" than helping point anyone toward the practical principles of the Declaration of Independence. America has clearly lost touch with who we are as a nation. We have a national identity crisis.

The Declaration of Independence is America's thesis statement, and without it America doesn't exist.

It is urgent that we get reacquainted with the Declaration of Independence because postmodernism would have us believe that we've evolved beyond the America of our founding documents, and thus they're irrelevant to the present and the future. But the Declaration of Independence is America's thesis statement, and without it America doesn't exist.

Today, much of the nation is so addicted to partisan indignation that "day-to-day" indignation isn't enough to feed the addiction. So, we're reaching into America's past to help us get our fix. In 2016, Democrats in the Louisiana state legislature tabled a bill that would have required fourth through sixth graders to recite the opening lines of the Declaration. They didn't table it because they thought it would be too difficult or too patriotic. They tabled it because the requirement would include the phrase “all men are created equal" and the progressives in the Louisiana legislature didn't want the children to have to recite a lie. Representative Barbara Norton said, “One thing that I do know is, all men are not created equal. When I think back in 1776, July the fourth, African Americans were slaves. And for you to bring a bill to request that our children will recite the Declaration, I think it's a little bit unfair to us. To ask our children to recite something that's not the truth. And for you to ask those children to repeat the Declaration stating that all men's are free. I think that's unfair."

Remarkable — an elected representative saying it wouldn't be fair for students to have to recite the Declaration because “all men are not created equal." Another Louisiana Democrat explained that the government born out of the Declaration “was used against races of people." I guess they missed that part in school where they might have learned that the same government later made slavery illegal and amended the Constitution to guarantee all men equal protection under the law. The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments were an admission of guilt by the nation regarding slavery, and an effort to right the wrongs.

Yet, the progressive logic goes something like this: many of the men who signed the Declaration of Independence, including Thomas Jefferson who wrote it, owned slaves; slavery is evil; therefore, the Declaration of Independence is not valid because it was created by evil slave owners.

It's a sad reality that the left has a very hard time appreciating the universal merits of the Declaration of Independence because they're so hung up on the long-dead issue of slavery. And just to be clear — because people love to take things out of context — of course slavery was horrible. Yes, it is a total stain on our history. But defending the Declaration of Independence is not an effort to excuse any aspect of slavery.

Okay then, people might say, how could the Founders approve the phrase “All men are created equal," when many of them owned slaves? How did they miss that?

They didn't miss it. In fact, Thomas Jefferson included an anti-slavery passage in his first draft of the Declaration. The paragraph blasted King George for condoning slavery and preventing the American Colonies from passing legislation to ban slavery:

He has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights to life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating and carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere... Determined to keep open a market where men should be bought and sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce.

We don't say “execrable" that much anymore. It means, utterly detestable, abominable, abhorrent — basically very bad.

Jefferson was upset when Georgia and North Carolina threw up the biggest resistance to that paragraph. Ultimately, those two states twisted Congress' arm to delete the paragraph.

Still, how could a man calling the slave trade “execrable" be a slaveowner himself? No doubt about it, Jefferson was a flawed human being. He even had slaves from his estate in Virginia attending him while he was in Philadelphia, in the very apartment where he was writing the Declaration.

Many of the Southern Founders deeply believed in the principles of the Declaration yet couldn't bring themselves to upend the basis of their livelihood. By 1806, Virginia law made it more difficult for slave owners to free their slaves, especially if the owner had significant debts as Jefferson did.

At the same time, the Founders were not idiots. They understood the ramifications of signing on to the principles described so eloquently in the Declaration. They understood that logically, slavery would eventually have to be abolished in America because it was unjust, and the words they were committing to paper said as much. Remember, John Adams was on the committee of five that worked on the Declaration and he later said that the Revolution would never be complete until the slaves were free.

Also, the same generation that signed the Declaration started the process of abolition by banning the importation of slaves in 1807. Jefferson was President at the time and he urged Congress to pass the law.

America has an obvious road map that, as a nation, we're not consulting often enough.

The Declaration took a major step toward crippling the institution of slavery. It made the argument for the first time about the fundamental rights of all humans which completely undermined slavery. Planting the seeds to end slavery is not nearly commendable enough for leftist critics, but you can't discount the fact that the seeds were planted. It's like they started an expiration clock for slavery by approving the Declaration. Everything that happened almost a century later to end slavery, and then a century after that with the Civil Rights movement, flowed from the principles voiced in the Declaration.

Ironically for a movement that calls itself progressive, it is obsessed with retrying and judging the past over and over. Progressives consider this a better use of time than actually putting past abuses in the rearview and striving not to be defined by ancestral failures.

It can be very constructive to look to the past, but not when it's used to flog each other in the present. Examining history is useful in providing a road map for the future. And America has an obvious road map that, as a nation, we're not consulting often enough. But it's right there, the original, under glass. The ink is fading, but the words won't die — as long as we continue to discuss them.

'Good Morning Texas' gives exclusive preview of Mercury One museum

Screen shot from Good Morning Texas

Mercury One is holding a special exhibition over the 4th of July weekend, using hundreds of artifacts, documents and augmented reality experiences to showcase the history of slavery — including slavery today — and a path forward. Good Morning Texas reporter Paige McCoy Smith went through the exhibit for an exclusive preview with Mercury One's chief operating officer Michael Little on Tuesday.

Watch the video below to see the full preview.

Click here to purchase tickets to the museum (running from July 4 - 7).

Over the weekend, journalist Andy Ngo and several other apparent right-leaning people were brutally beaten by masked-gangs of Antifa protesters in Portland, Oregon. Short for "antifascist," Antifa claims to be fighting for social justice and tolerance — by forcibly and violently silencing anyone with opposing opinions. Ngo, who was kicked, punched, and sprayed with an unknown substance, is currently still in the hospital with a "brain bleed" as a result of the savage attack. Watch the video to get the details from Glenn.