Glenn Beck: DNC takes a gas holiday

GLENN: Now, here's one of the most incredible stories I have read today and I've read a lot of incredible stories.  Wait until I get to the John Edwards story.

I've read a lot of incredible stories today.  Here's one from the DNC host committee in Denver, tanking up at city gas pumps to avoid paying the $0.40 a gallon in combined Federal and State gas taxes.  Let me repeat that.  The DNC would like to save money for their convention and so they have decided that they're going to buy it from the State gas pumps.  You know where the police officers and State troopers and everybody else, you know, the snow removal trucks, where they gas up.  The DNC has struck a deal that they can gas their cars up during the convention and they've already started this, to avoid the $0.40 a gallon gas tax.  From the same people who said the gas tax won't make any difference, the gas tax means nothing.  I mean, is there economists that have approved this, because this is fantastic.  The gas tax doesn't make a difference.  Now, I'm sure they'll counter with saying, we're buying so much gas, which makes sense, because now when you think about it, you realize that they did suspend the gas tax for all the trucking companies ‑‑ oops.  No, no.  They didn't do that.  But they did cut it for small business people because small business people are ‑‑ um, no, no, they didn't do that, either.  This is the same party that wanted to temporarily suspend the Federal portion of the gas tax, 18.4 cents a gallon for the summer, remember, because it doesn't really add up to very much.  That's what they ‑‑ that's what they said when they were against suspending the Federal gas tax, but I think this goes even further.  They also say that the republicans are doing it at the GOP convention.  Well, do you know what?  Two wrongs don't make a right.  The GOP at this point says that they're not doing that.  They can show you the gas bills where they're, you know, buying it at private pumps.  They're not doing that.  If they are, they're just as big a scum bags as you are.  You've got to be kidding me.  They're doing it.  She started it!  I don't care who started it.  I don't care who else is doing it.  You're doing it and we'll look into the GOP.  If they're doing it, they're just as arrogant as you are.

Now, here's the interesting thing, as well, because, boy, there's just a little ways to go on this one, it's interesting that the DNC has decided to cut the private sector out of it.  Instead of pouring money into the economy and helping people who are running gas stations, going and helping people at the ‑‑ you know, because sometimes you go in and you might buy a bottled water at the same time you're filling up at the gas tank because that's the only food you can afford.  No, no, no.  Instead of doing that, they're giving the money to the State government.  They're buying the gas from the State.  So, let's cut out any kind of private industry.  You've got to be kidding me.  But, wait.  There's more.  They also say ‑‑ this is their excuse this morning ‑‑ we're only doing this ‑‑ I want to quote this.  "We're only doing this so we know that the gas is not tainted.  We are using this as a safety and security measure."  Excuse me?  Excuse me?  Who the hell do you think you are?  Nobody knows you.  You're standing next to a gas pump.  Nobody knows who you are.  You're using it as a safety and security measure?  What?  Operatives are going to go in and put sugar in the tanks where they think you might go buy your gas?  Here's an idea.  Don't buy your gas at the same gas station.  Spread the wealth around.  What do you think of that one?  What do you mean?  You know what they should do?  They should just nationalize all of the oil companies.  That way they know for sure that the oil coming out of those oil companies is safe for them and then they could just nationalize all of the refineries.  That way they know all of the refined oil in the gas would be safe for them.  Oh, no.  Here's what they could do:  They could also nationalize all of the pumps.  That way they know that everything pumped into their car would be safe.  No.  But somebody could steal their credit card.  Maybe they should nationalize American Express and Visa.  While you're at it, why don't we just nationalize all the banks?  I mean, we're almost there, anyway.  They're too large to fail.  These people are insane and out of control!  The arrogance is just ‑‑ I mean, I can't ‑‑ two things.  I can't take it anymore and part of the thing I can't take anymore is that these guys continue to do it over and over and over again, insulting and injuring us over and over and over again and, yet, nobody in the media is really going to pay attention to this.  This isn't going to be a big deal because half of the country ‑‑ no, I wouldn't say that ‑‑ 20 percent of this country is asleep.  They don't care.  Whatever!  Oh, they're all like that!  While the other half just continually is reinjured over and over and over and over again.  It's a ticking time bomb, man, when you think that you can go and get away with skipping the Federal and State gas tax because, well, you're a politician, you're a political party, and, yet, you let the people suffer, let them eat cake.  Is there no cake?  Unbelievable."

You know, I found somebody the other day that somebody brought to my attention.  I want to introduce her.  Her name is Sarah Steelman.  I'm got to go this with republicans and the democrats.  I'm going to search these people out.  I am so tired of the weasels.  I'm so tired of people saying, oh, no, our party is innocent.  It's them.  No, it's not.  It's both of you.  So, I want to look for the politicians that are doing the right thing and I don't care what political party they're in.  Right now this woman, Sarah Steelman, she is the Missouri State treasurer and she's running for the governor of Missouri, but the ‑‑ and she's running at a Republican, but the RNC ‑‑ no, they don't want her in.  The republicans have endorsed the opposition.  It's a primary for the governor.  It's a Congressman.  Now, I don't know anything about the Congressman and I know he's done pork spending and everything else, but what's interesting to me is that the party doesn't endorse her.  That's fine.  They've got to pick a side but listen and see if approximate you think this might have played a role on why she has not been endorsed by the Republican party.  This is the reason why she should be endorsed.  One, she's the State treasurer.  She has attempted to strip all of the State similarities through their pension through legislation.  She says you shouldn't get a lifetime pension for that.  You served.  Bye bye.  Move on.  She enacted the sunshine law requiring politicians to be more open in their activities.  She has been after the earmarks in the pork spending ‑‑ you've got to love this one.  As the State treasurer, she stopped a payment on a $70,000 secret settlement check that the Republican State government cut to settle a sexual harassment suit.  She said, you want to settle this thing, fine.  But it's the people's money.  You can't just brush this one under.  It's $70,000.  I'm not going to sign any check that you are ‑‑ that is a secret.  You tell the people how you're spending their money.  She also announced that the State would no longer provide below market interest rates for ethanol plants that had State officials or their relatives among primary investors.  Think of that.  That's crazy.  She's attacked ethanol waste.  She wants more drilling.  She wants to build a refinery.  She says I don't want to build a refinery just anywhere.  I want to build it in our own state.  Build it in my backyard.  We need the energy.  I love this woman.  Do we have her on the phone?  We have her at 9:30?

This is the kind of politician I want, one that will say, here's the facts.  We've got to drill.  We've got to build more refineries.  I'm not covering up for you because, I'm in your party.  You don't even me.  You don't cover up.  I work for the anywhere, not for the RNC.  I work for the party, not for the DNC.  Somebody ‑‑ why did this story in the DNC in Colorado, why did this story come out not from a Democrat?  Is there no Democrat involved that says, this is crazy!  Was there nobody involved that said that?  Is there anybody that sees hypocrisy here?

To me, I just ‑‑ I just can't imagine what it's going to take for the American people to finally say, "excuse me?"  Stu, do you think anybody is going to pay attention to the gas tax in Colorado?  Here's my prediction:  It's going to be right down partisan lines.  They're going to say, oh, well, that's republicans do it, too, without absolutely no fact and if it is, I'll the be the one saying those reps cans are doing it out, let's kick them both out.  They'll deflect it and so the argument will be about which party is better instead of, my gosh, this is unethical and hypocritical and wrong.  Do you think anybody will have that discussion on television?"

We did our homework over the weekend; we did the research so we can tell you what is likely coming from Senate Democrats regarding President Trump's Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett. Based on our research and the anonymous people who have already come forward to talk about Coney Barrett's youth, these are the main shocking things you can expect Senate Democrats to seize on during the confirmation process…

A man has come forward under the banner of "#MenToo," to say that in second grade, Amy Coney Barrett and her best friend at the time, cornered him at a birthday party at Chuck-E-Cheese and "injected him with a full dose of cooties." Which, if true, would obviously be disqualifying for serving on the highest court in the land.

Then there's a woman who says when she was nine-years-old, she lived on the same street as Amy Coney Barrett. She alleges that Coney-Barrett borrowed her VHS tape of Herbie Goes Bananas and did not return it for at least six months. And then when she did finally get the tape back, the woman says Coney Barrett did not even bother to rewind it. The FBI has interviewed at least two witnesses so far who say the tape was indeed not rewound and that it was very upsetting to the owner of the tape. Again, if true, this is troubling – clearly not the kind of integrity you want to see in a Supreme Court justice.

Apparently, in their elementary school days, they liked to drink milk – and lots of it.

The same neighbor also dropped a bombshell allegation about the drinking problem of Amy Coney Barrett and her closest friends. Apparently, in their elementary school days, they liked to drink milk – and lots of it. The neighbor says she "frequently" witnessed Coney-Barrett and her friends chugging entire cartons of milk – often Whole Milk, sometimes Chocolate Milk, occasionally both at the same time through a funnel.

Unfortunately, shooting-up cooties, injurious rewinding, and potential calcium-abuse are not even the worst of it.

A third person has now come forward, another man, and this is just reprehensible, it's hard to even fathom. But he alleges that in fourth grade, when they were around ten-years-old, Amy Coney Barrett and a group of "four or five of her friends" gang-GRAPED him on the playground during recess. He alleges the group of friends snuck uneaten grapes out of the cafeteria and gang-GRAPED him repeatedly in broad daylight. In other words, and I hate to have to spell this out because it's kind of graphic, but the group led by ten-year-old Amy Coney Barrett pelted this poor defenseless boy with whole grapes. He recalls them "laughing the whole time" as they were gang-GRAPING him.

He recalls them "laughing the whole time" as they were gang-GRAPING him.

Obviously, even if just one of these allegations is half-true, no Senator with a conscience could possibly vote to confirm Coney Barrett. When there is a clear pattern of destructive childhood behavior, it always continues into adulthood. Because people do not change. Ever.

Fortunately, for the sake of the Republic, Democrats plan to subpoena Coney Barrett's childhood diary, to see what, if any, insights it may provide into her calcium habits, as well as her abuse of illicit cooties and the gang-GRAPING incident.

We will keep you posted on the latest, but for now, it looks like Democrats will find plenty in the reckless pre-teen life of Amy Coney Barrett to cast doubt on her nomination. And if not, they can always fall back on her deranged preference for letting babies be born.

[NOTE: The preceding was a parody written by MRA writer Nathan Nipper.]

On the radio program Friday, Glenn Beck discussed the recent news that a primary source for the Steele Dossier — the document on which much of the Trump-Russia collusion investigation was based — had been investigated by the FBI for contacts with suspected Russian spies. Glenn also shared several previously unpublished texts and emails from FBI agents have recently been released.

According to a letter sent by Attorney General William Barr to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Thursday, the FBI knew early on that the research compiled by ex-British intelligence agent Christopher Steele relied on a "Primary Sub-source" that had been "the subject of an FBI counterintelligence investigation from 2009 to 2011 that assessed his or her contacts with suspected Russian intelligence officers" — but still used it to obtain warrants to spy on former Trump campaign-aide Carter Page.

But, it gets even worse. Now, new leaked texts and communications from FBI agents within the department at the time of the entire Russian collusion effort were disclosed in federal court filings on Thursday. According to the court documents, FBI agents purchased "professional liability insurance" to protect themselves in January 2017, just weeks before Donald Trump was inaugurated president, because they were concerned about the agency's potentially illegal activity during the Russia collusion investigation.

"Trump was right," one FBI employee wrote in response to then-President-elect Trump's Jan 3, 2017 tweet which read: "The 'Intelligence' briefing on so-called 'Russian hacking' was delayed until Friday, perhaps more time needed to build a case. Very strange!"

Watch the video below for more details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Chief researcher Jason Buttrill joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Thursday to discuss an "explosive" new report released Wednesday by Senate Republicans on Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, and the Ukrainian energy company Burisma.

Among other serious allegations, the 87-page report claims that "Hunter Biden received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the wife of the former mayor of Moscow," and the richest woman in Russia.

"The transactions discussed [in the report] are designed to illustrate the depth and extent of some questionable financial transactions. Moreover, the financial transactions illustrate serious counterintelligence and extortion concerns relating to Hunter Biden and his family," the report stated.

Jason suggested the Senate's findings provide additional evidence to back allegations of a money-laundering scheme, which Glenn detailed in a four-part series about Biden's shady connections to Ukraine. Learn more on this here.

"Laundered money is very hard to track to its finality," Jason explained. "I'm sure the Biden camp is really hoping that it just looks suspicious, but [investigators] don't ever find the eventual end point. But, if they do – and it's possible they already have – this is going to be explosive, very explosive."

Watch the video below for more details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Revolutions rarely happen overnight. The Left started laying the groundwork for November 3, 2020, the moment Hillary Clinton had to concede the 2016 election to Donald Trump. It was always solely about getting rid of President Trump — and there's a playbook for that.

Last week, Glenn Beck showed you the "Seven Pillars of Color Revolution" written by a former U.S. diplomat, which are the conditions that must be in place for a successful Eastern European-style "Color Revolution." The left seems to be pushing for a Color Revolution this election because they are using the exact same playbook.

In part two of this series, Glenn peels back the layers on the first four of these Color Revolution pillars to show you how they work and what the end goal is. And he reveals one of the architects of the playbook – a Color Revolution specialist, former ambassador, and former Obama administration official who is one of the key masterminds of this revolution.

Joining Glenn is political campaign veteran and BlazeTV host Steve Deace who says the polls that claim Biden is leading the race "are trash." We're being set up to believe that if Trump wins in spite of the polls, it must be an invalid election.

Watch the full video below:


WATCH all of Glenn's Specials on BlazeTV:

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multiplatform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Save $10 with promo code GLENN.