Glenn Beck: Beijing boots 'chubby, uneven tooth' kid


Chinese media blackout on faked Olympic ceremony saga

GLENN: I'm just glad that I haven't had to see any bucktooth kids during the Olympics. You know what I mean? If I would see because when I see Chinese people, I think, that's the perfect flawless image right there. That's what that is. And, you know, I wouldn't know what to think of a country that all of a sudden, I mean, all their people start looking like every Englishman ever born. You know, what would you think? What would you think? You're 9 and your teeth aren't perfect? What kind of freakish country is that? Oh, man.

You know, when I saw the little 9 year old girl singing the National Anthem, I thought, wow, that's really neat. And they did this contest. "Hey, hey, let's have the perfect little Chinese girl sing the National Anthem and everybody will go crazy and it will be great." So they found them. It's great. Only the problem is the girl that won didn't sing the song because the general music director of the ceremony, he came out and said the state broadcaster confirmed that the actual singer was 7 year old Yang Peiyi. They lip synched but with an entirely different kid. Yang was a little chubby. You ain't having fat chicks on TV, are you, China? Whoa. Good thing you're teaching your kids right out of the chute: Hey, fat kid, sit down. And she also had well, she also had uneven teeth. She was, quote, not attractive enough. Oh, well, hang on. Hitler, can we borrow your oven for a second? Can we get this fat kid in?

The reason why, quoting, the reason why little Yang was not chosen was because we wanted to project the right image. We were thinking of what's best for the nation. Oh. Oh, well, why didn't you say that in the first place. The right image? Sure. And I'm sure little Yang who's fat with crooked teeth is not crying herself to sleep every night and thinking about, is it just the Japanese that can commit Harry Carey? I'm sure she's not doing that every night thinking that the country has said she's not the right image and wasn't the best for the nation. I'm sure that's not going to cause any self esteem problems. Anybody have daughters? If you have daughters and you're a guy, how many times have you said something like, "I don't know, that shirt really doesn't look good." Or, you know, "Hey, pull your shirt down" or "Pull your pants up" or whatever to your daughter and your wife will look at you like, "What are you saying!" Then you go into the other room: "Do you know that's going to leave a mark on her forever?" "No, I don't... what?" Oh, I'm sure, I'm sure the state coming out and saying, whoa, porky, have a seat, that's not going to bother her. And by the way, the reason was national interest. Quote: The child on camera should be flawless in image. Internal feelings and expression flawless. Oh. By the way, that was Chen that said that. He's the world renowned composer and French citizen.

Well, isn't it great? We should just breed more French Chinese. We should just like, you know, breed them like we do puppy dogs. Just, we need the best of the French and the best of the Chinese and put them together and this is what we get. It's beautiful when you that's like, if you could just get the Germans and the Italians together, it's always magic. That's terrible, that's just great. That always ends well.

Chen, the French Chinaman, said that the final decision to stage the event with lip sinking to another girl's voice was taken after a senior member of the Chinese ruling communist party Politburo attended a rehearsal. He quote said, "There's a problem and you need to fix it." So we did. Heil Hitler, baby. That doesn't sound creepy at all. Does that creep anybody else out? I like that. I'm glad we're over participating in the NBC Olympics. I hope NBC can give us more propaganda. This is fantastic. What would he have done if the order was take the kid out to a rice paddy and drown them? That is crazy, wonderful rice, I can put that underneath nice chicken... I'm sure that they would have drawn the line at drowning them in a rice paddy. By the way, it's been learned that other parts of the show have been fake as well. The fireworks that depicted the footprints moving from central Beijing's Tienenmann Square, partly computer generated, prerecorded for TV. But here's the best part. Bob Costas said that. What you are looking at is film magic, these aren't he said that. I got it. All you have to do is listen to it. But what they didn't say is why. Why? Grucci has spent like a year over isn't it weird the people who invented fireworks needed an American firework company to come over and do the fireworks. Anyway, the reason they decided to do that is because of the mist problem. They knew that the mist, otherwise known as smog by the way, they are just waiting for us to get on to the green bandwagon and then they're there. Anyway, Grucci said nobody will be able to see it from the mist. So that's why it was computer generated. Because the smog was so bad! Meanwhile they're down on the field lecturing us about how everybody needs to protect the environment. Seriously, China, I just wish we could be more like you, I do. Making the chubby fatty fat fatso 9 year old, 9 year old sing off camera because she's not attractive enough. And boy, when you say the truth, it's the truth. Faking huge parts of the ceremony in order to pump up your image? Where do I sign up for this? This is imagine if the United States did that? Imagine. People would be in an uproar. That's crazy. How could you do that, you do that to a little child? You don't treat anybody like that, let alone a little child. Why isn't the rest of the world outraged by this? It's China. It's a step up. Hey, usually you'd drown the fat kid in the rice paddy. "Oh, that is true." "Oh, yes, I've seen it myself."

The interview that Chang gave, by the way, the Chinese Frenchman was on the Internet for a very short time and then it suddenly disappeared off of the Internet. I don't know how that happened. That is really, really, really super weird. I wish we had that wonderful Fairness Doctrine like they have in China. I can only hope for change.

Most self-proclaimed Marxists know very little about Marxism. Some of them have all the buzzwords memorized. They talk about the exploits of labor. They talk about the slavery of capitalist society and the alienation caused by capital. They talk about the evils of power and domination.

But they don't actually believe what they say. Or else they wouldn't be such violent hypocrites. And we're not being dramatic when we say "violent."

For them, Marxism is a political tool that they use to degrade and annoy their political enemies.

They don't actually care about the working class.

Another important thing to remember about Marxists is that they talk about how they want to defend the working class, but they don't actually understand the working class. They definitely don't realize that the working class is composed mostly of so many of the people they hate. Because, here's the thing, they don't actually care about the working class. Or the middle class. They wouldn't have the slightest clue how to actually work, not the way we do. For them, work involves ranting about how work and labor are evil.

Ironically, if their communist utopia actually arrived, they would be the first ones against the wall. Because they have nothing to offer except dissent. They have no practical use and no real connection to reality.

Again ironically, they are the ultimate proof of the success of capitalism. The fact that they can freely call for its demise, in tweets that they send from their capitalistic iPhones, is proof that capitalism affords them tremendous luxuries.

Their specialty is complaining. They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They sneer at Christianity for promising Heaven in exchange for good deeds on earth — which is a terrible description of Christianity, but it's what they actually believe — and at the same time they criticize Christianity for promising a utopia, they give their unconditional devotion to a religion that promises a utopia.

They are fanatics of a religion that is endlessly cynical.

They think capitalism has turned us into machines. Which is a bad interpretation of Marx's concept of the General Intellect, the idea that humans are the ones who create machines, so humans, not God, are the creators.

They think that the only way to achieve the perfect society is by radically changing and even destroying the current society. It's what they mean when they say things about the "status quo" and "hegemony" and the "established order." They believe that the system is broken and the way to fix it is to destroy, destroy, destroy.

Critical race theory actually takes it a step farther. It tells us that the racist system can never be changed. That racism is the original sin that white people can never overcome. Of course, critical race theorists suggest "alternative institutions," but these "alternative institutions" are basically the same as the ones we have now, only less effective and actually racist.

Marx's violent revolution never happened. Or at least it never succeeded. Marx's followers have had to take a different approach. And now, we are living through the Revolution of Constant Whining.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.

Americans are losing faith in our justice system and the idea that legal consequences are applied equally — even to powerful elites in office.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to detail what he believes will come next with the Durham investigation, which hopefully will provide answers to the Obama FBI's alleged attempts to sabotage former President Donald Trump and his campaign years ago.

Rep. Nunes and Glenn assert that we know Trump did NOT collude with Russia, and that several members of the FBI possibly committed huge abuses of power. So, when will we see justice?

Watch the video clip below:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The corporate media is doing everything it can to protect Dr. Anthony Fauci after Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) roasted him for allegedly lying to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

During an extremely heated exchange at a Senate hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Paul challenged Dr. Fauci — who, as the director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, oversees research programs at the National Institute of Health — on whether the NIH funded dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Dr. Fauci denied the claims, but as Sen. Paul knows, there are documents that prove Dr. Fauci's NIH was funding gain-of-function research in the Wuhan biolab before COVID-19 broke out in China.

On "The Glenn Beck Program," Glenn and Producer Stu Burguiere presented the proof, because Dr. Fauci's shifting defenses don't change the truth.

Watch the video clip below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Critical race theory: A special brand of evil

wal_172619/Pixabay

Part of what makes it hard for us to challenge the left is that their beliefs are complicated. We don't mean complicated in a positive way. They aren't complicated the way love is complicated. They're complicated because there's no good explanation for them, no basis in reality.

The left cannot pull their heads out of the clouds. They are stuck on romantic ideas, abstract ideas, universal ideas. They talk in theories. They see the world through ideologies. They cannot divorce themselves from their own academic fixations. And — contrary to what they believe and how they act — it's not because leftists are smarter than the rest of us. And studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country. Marx was no different. The Communist Manifesto talks about how the rise of cities "rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life."

Studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country.

Instead of admitting that they're pathological hypocrites, they tell us that we're dumb and tell us to educate ourselves. Okay, so we educate ourselves; we return with a coherent argument. Then they say, "Well, you can't actually understand what you just said unless you understand the work of this other obscure Marxist writer. So educate yourselves more."

It's basically the "No True Scotsman" fallacy, the idea that when you point out a flaw in someone's argument, they say, "Well, that's a bad example."

After a while, it becomes obvious that there is no final destination for their bread-crumb trail. Everything they say is based on something that somebody else said, which is based on something somebody else said.

Take critical race theory. We're sure you've noticed by now that it is not evidence-based — at all. It is not, as academics say, a quantitative method. It doesn't use objective facts and data to arrive at conclusions. Probably because most of those conclusions don't have any basis in reality.

Critical race theory is based on feelings. These feelings are based on theories that are also based on feelings.

We wanted to trace the history of critical race theory back to the point where its special brand of evil began. What allowed it to become the toxic, racist monster that it is today?

Later, we'll tell you about some of the snobs who created critical theory, which laid the groundwork for CRT. But if you follow the bread-crumb trail from their ideas, you wind up with Marxism.

For years, the staff has devoted a lot of time to researching Marxism. We have read a lot of Marx and Marxist writing. It's part of our promise to you to be as informed as possible, so that you know where to go for answers; so that you know what to say when your back is up against the wall. What happens when we take the bread-crumb trail back farther, past Marxism? What is it based on?

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism.

It's actually based on the work of one of the most important philosophers in human history, a 19th-century German philosopher named Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism. And, as you'll see in just a bit, if we look at Hegel's actual ideas, it's obvious that Marx completely misrepresented them in order to confirm his own fantasies.

So, in a way, that's where the bread-crumb trail ends: With Marx's misrepresentation of an incredibly important, incredibly useful philosophy, a philosophy that's actually pretty conservative.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.