Glenn Beck: P Diddy's poetic prose


Renown statesman P-Diddy demands McCain should stop 'buggin'...

CALLER: Hey, I have a question for you. Did you hear what Puff Daddy said about Sarah Palin?

GLENN: I believe it's P. Diddy now. From Rexburg, Idaho, Puff Daddy, you're so yesterday.

CALLER: I know. Well, I listen to the guy yesterday and I was amazed because first he starts off and says there are I don't think there's any black people in Alaska. And then a little bit later he says there ain't no or there is no black people in Alaska, or crack heads.

GLENN: Hang on just a second. Let's listen to what he actually said. This is what he actually said. This is P. Diddy.

P. DIDDY: Alaska? Alaska? Alaska, Alaska, come on, man. I don't even know if there's any black people in Alaska. If you really think that we're going to let you win this election with these, like, crazy decisions that you're making, November 4th, we have to protect our future because John McCain is bugging the [BLEEP] out, okay?

GLENN: That was good political commentary there by Puff Daddy, as they say in Rexburg.

CALLER: I that you was it was amazing because he started off by saying he doesn't know but all of a sudden he came to a realization there is no. I was just up in Alaska for two months and let me tell you there's a few of them. And crack heads aplenty.

GLENN: Really?

CALLER: Yeah. I've never seen so many homeless people in my life. And I actually was born in Alaska. I love Alaska. It's a beautiful state.

GLENN: Why does Sarah Palin hate the black crack addict homeless person that you apparently saw in the streets of Alaska? Why does she hate them so much?

CALLER: Because she's white.

GLENN: All right, good. I'm glad we have it down. You have more of this P. Diddy thing?

DAN: Yeah, the second part he was talking about which was later on in these ramblings, we've got to post this whole thing on the Internet because this is amazing stuff, but here it is.

P. DIDDY: What is the reality in Alaska? There's not even no crack heads in Alaska, no black people. There's not even no, like

GLENN: Hang on just a second. Is that a good thing to P. Diddy that there are no crack heads? I mean, is it a bad thing that there's no crack heads?


STU: That means she's doing a good job?

GLENN: I just wish we had more crack heads in the neighborhood. Honey, what did you think of the last house we saw? I don't know. I didn't see a single crackhouse. Where are we going to go for our crack? What does that even mean?

Oh, by the way, Obama's giving a speech on women and the economy today. But McCain is the one freaking out, seriously. By the way, P. Diddy, I just want to because I know you can't understand, you know, because there are no black people in Alaska. So Sarah Palin clearly can't relate to black people because there are no black people. How many black people in Alaska? Done the homework for you. 4.72% of the population. It is below average. It is below average. 4.72% of the population. That's the population of Alaska. So you were right. There are black people, but it's just below the national average.

You know, let me just give you comparison here. That's just below the national average. That would be like if I compare where does P. Diddy live, Stu?

STU: Alpine, New Jersey, Glenn.

GLENN: Alpine, New Jersey. Okay. Oh, my gosh, I just happen to have the stats. What's the percentage of people that live in Alpine, New Jersey? The place where P. Diddy chose to live, but he had enough money to live anywhere on planet Earth. Percentage of black people living in Alpine New Jersey? 1.51%. So that's about 33 total black residents, 32 if you don't count P. Diddy. So apparently Sarah Palin can understand black people a little more than three times better than P. Diddy. Of course, I don't know how many crack heads they have in Alpine, New Jersey. Let's just go out on a limb and say maybe at least one.

Let's go to Dick in Florida. Hello, Dick.

CALLER: Conservative optimist here, Glenn.

GLENN: Yes, sir.

CALLER: I don't know Mrs. Palin.

GLENN: Yes, thank you for calling her Mrs. Palin and not Ms. Palin like the New York Times has insisted in doing in every article today.

CALLER: No, it's Mrs.

GLENN: Yes.

CALLER: She's a married woman.

GLENN: Yes.

CALLER: And I don't know her, but I do know many women from Alaska, and you did mention earlier it is a little tough up there, you know.

GLENN: The women in Alaska, they could take me. Now, that's not saying much. The Southern Belles could take me, too. Would you like some sweet tea or I just crack you in the face. So I mean, it's not really saying a lot, but yes, they are a little tough up in Alaska.

CALLER: Very. And I think these attacks, if I'm not mistaken, and like you said if she doesn't implode, which I think the chances of that are about 1,000 to 1, maybe 10,000 to 1.

GLENN: I don't know. We'll see tonight.

CALLER: I don't know.

GLENN: Yeah. We'll see tonight.

CALLER: But my opinion is this will do nothing but strengthen her resolve.

GLENN: You know what, let me tell you something, Dick. I think you're right because that's just the kind of person that she is. I mean, she took on a corrupt system in Alaska. I mean, she has stood up to some of the most powerful people in politics and she won. She's not a wallflower. Now, I think if she gives a speech tonight and she is in control you know you remember that Dan Quayle thing that he had going for him and you're like, "Oh, boy, he doesn't know what he's talking about," you just see it in him, woof. If she has that look, she's done. I've spoken to her. I don't think she's going to have that look. She's very, very intelligent. She's up on it. If she comes out and she can deliver that speech and she can have do you remember the look that Bill Clinton had when he said, "I did not have sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky, and I've got to go back and do the work of the American people." When he said that, he had that attitude towards him. And he you're just like, okay, the guy can't be lying because, boy, I mean, if you're lying, that's sure going to destroy your career. Well, it doesn't reality doesn't count when it comes to the Clintons. But it will with Palin. When she comes out tonight, if she addresses and she should if she addresses what's going on in the media, she needs to do it in two ways. She needs to do it with humor, but she also needs to make it very clear you back off my family. You can say whatever you want about me but you back off my family. You want to have a fight, we'll fight but let's fight fair. Let's fight on the issues. So if she comes out and she has a moment of surgical strength where it is just, you back off my family and maybe follow it with a funny line. She has a moment where she's endearing and strong at the same time and she doesn't blow the rest of the speech, this is going to backfire and people are going to it is going to make her stronger.

You know, that's the thing that the Democrats don't understand and they really I mean, they're going to be in for it on this one. Strength is your weakness is your strength.

(OUT 11:42)

GLENN: 888 727 BECK. Let's go to Bud in New Mexico. Hello, Bud.

CALLER: Hello, Glenn. I'm just wondering what P. Diddy has against black people because in the comment that he says about black people and crack heads, he uses it all in one sentence and it kind of flows together and he sounds like he's calling black people, all black people crack heads.

GLENN: No, you just did. I don't think P. Diddy did. Play it back. Stu, did you notice? Did you notice what Bud just did?

STU: Wait. Bud, are you a Democrat?

CALLER: No, I am not.

STU: Okay, then he did say. He did.

GLENN: That's what I heard. Bud, you may not think so. You may protest all you want, but I think I can see the intent of your heart here and you're calling all black people crack heads. Here's P. Diddy and what he said.

P. DIDDY: What is the reality in Alaska? There's not even no crack heads in Alaska, no black people. There's not even no like

CALLER: Boy, it sounds like it to me.

GLENN: Of course, Mr. Racist, it sounds like it to you. To the rest of America they know that he was talking about crack heads and then African Americans and then there's no and then that, also that other one that he didn't say but we know he was probably talking about, you know, angels that support Barack Obama or something like that.

CALLER: Well, maybe if I start listening to more of his music, I should say any of his music, maybe I would be able to understand him better, right?

GLENN: Yeah. Well, of course you won't because racists don't usually own P. Diddy music. Could you play it back again? What does he say, the third one? What is it?

P. DIDDY: What is the reality in Alaska? There's not even no crack heads in Alaska, no black people, there ain't even no, like

GLENN: No like what?

P. DIDDY: Crime or, like foreign policies. Y'all may be

GLENN: Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Go back. What does he say again? He says there's no crack heads, no blacks, no crime.

P. DIDDY: Crime or, like, foreign policies.

GLENN: I'm trying to Stu, can you help me out here?

STU: (Laughing).

GLENN: Can you help me?

STU: This is the greatest thing I've ever heard in my life.

P. DIDDY: Crime or, like, foreign policies.

STU: (Laughing).

GLENN: What is he talking about?

STU: There's no foreign policies in Alaska (laughing).

GLENN: Which brings me right back to crack heads. Can WE go back and listen to this? Okay, there's two options, two options. One, he's as dumb as a box of rocks. A second one

STU: Stop. That's all you need.

GLENN: No, the second one is he's it's dawning on him as he gets to the third one how racist he is and then he's like, uh oh, this isn't good, let me talk about something else. Now listen, just give that theory a thought, that he's realizing he's a racist. Listen to this.

P. DIDDY: There's not even no crack heads in Alaska

GLENN: Now that's the first one. Hang on just a second. He said no crack heads in Alaska. And he realizes that he's already said no blacks in Alaska earlier. So that's the first thing. You notice that little pause where he's like, uh oh. That's when he hears in his head, uh oh, might be a racist. But it doesn't stop him. Go ahead.

P. DIDDY: In Alaska, no black people, there's not even no, like

GLENN: This is where he says, oh, no, finish the sentence, come up with something, there's no

P. DIDDY: Crime or, like, foreign policy.

GLENN: "Oh, foreign policy, let me stop with foreign policy." Or is he just dumb as a box of rocks?

STU: It's plausible, although I don't think

GLENN: Which is more likely? Dumb as a box of rocks or a racist?

STU: It's got to be dumb as a box of rocks, I think.

GLENN: Over racist?

STU: Yeah, I don't think he

GLENN: How about dumb racist?

STU: Well, certainly if a white person said it, he would be racist. But

GLENN: And if a white person said it and if a white person said it exactly the way he did, they would be a white racist dummy.

STU: Oh, no doubt about it.

GLENN: Right.

STU: But that's not the case here, Glenn.

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: As you can see, I think you can kind of see him having absolutely no idea. First of all, the foreign policies is a giveaway. But I love it, think of how giant the question mark is after he says the word "Crime." Like if you were reading the sentence and you needed to pronounce it the way he's pronouncing it, how large would you have to make the question mark on the piece of paper to pronounce it like this?

P. DIDDY: Crime?

STU: Crime?

P. DIDDY: Crime?

STU: (Laughing).

GLENN: Amazing.

STU: We should play this video every this is the greatest piece of audio I've ever heard. Can we hear the whole thing one more time? Just in context.

GLENN: Hang on. Go ahead.

P. DIDDY: What is the reality in Alaska? What is there's not even no crack heads in Alaska, no black people. There's not even no, like... crime or, like, foreign policies. Y'all may be versed on foreign policies. Y'all need to get versed on black policies and youth policies. We're the future.

GLENN: They need Alaska needs black policies?

DAN: Thought they didn't have any black people.

GLENN: Could you go back and read the Martin Luther King speech?

STU: Why would you need black policies if you had no black people? That doesn't make any sense. I don't think he's thought this through at all.

VOICE: Why.

VOICE: Oh, come on!

P. DIDDY: Crime?

The Biden Admin EXPANDED abortion access because they DON'T believe in the Constitution

Joshua Lott / Stringer, JOSEPH PREZIOSO / Contributor | Getty Images

This month has already produced an extreme example of why we need a functional and more conservative Congress in order for America to have a chance at moving forward—because the Left does not believe in the Constitution.

Sure, if you confronted a Democrat in Congress, they would probably claim some sort of allegiance to the Constitution—but as a practical matter, they do not believe in it.

Instead, the Left has put all of their eggs in the basket of the executive branch. Why? Because it has the furthest reach through all the various departments, and it can move the fastest—in short, because it’s the most dictatorial. It only takes a department head to write a new memo, or even better, the President to sign a new executive order to carry the force of law.

The Left has put all of their eggs in the basket of the executive branch.

Do you recall any of the Left’s favorite Supreme Court decisions over the years—something like gay marriage for example—and how Republicans immediately tried to subvert it, using the executive branch to try to nullify the decision? Yeah, that never happened. But that is exactly what Democrats have done in recent weeks to expand abortion access.

Democrats only consider the Supreme Court legitimate when they approve of the decisions. When the miraculous overturning of Roe v. Wade happened last summer, President Biden called it “a realization of an extreme ideology and a tragic error by the Supreme Court.”

Democrats only consider the Supreme Court legitimate when they approve of the decisions.

Recently the FDA approved local pharmacies to issue abortion pills. For the first 20 years after these pills were developed, they were not treated like typical prescription drugs. They had to be dispensed in-person by a doctor. That in-person requirement is now gone.

Keep in mind that the Left’s go-to line is that abortion is always about the health and safety of women, yet a 2021 peer-reviewed study found that chemical abortions have a complication rate four times greater than surgical abortions. Between 2002 and 2015, the rate of abortion-related ER visits following use of the abortion pills increased by 507 percent.

Chemical abortions have a complication rate four times greater than surgical abortions.

And now the Biden administration is making these less-safe abortions much more accessible. Thanks to the FDA’s rule change, Walgreens and CVS have already agreed to dispense abortion pills in states where abortion is legal—effectively turning these stores into new abortion clinics.

As for states that have abortion bans, "Team Biden" announced a new way around those too. Three weeks ago, the Justice Department issued a legal opinion that the U.S. Postal Service is allowed to deliver abortion pills anywhere, even in places where abortion is illegal. What’s their rationale? That the sender cannot know for sure whether the recipient will use the pills illegally or not. So it’s totally okay.

The U.S. Postal Service is allowed to deliver abortion pills anywhere, even in places where abortion is illegal.

Georgetown Law professor Lawrence Gostin told the Washington Post that this Justice Department opinion is “a major expansion of abortion access in the United States.”

So, to recap—the Biden administration has used the FDA, the Justice Department, and the Post Office, which all fall under the executive branch, to provide an end-run around the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson decision.

Expanding abortion was easy—simple policy tweaks and declarations that carry the force of law without an ounce of input from actual lawmakers in Congress—all because it comes from the grotesque, bloated, apparently pro-death executive branch.

Glenn is one of the most outspoken critics of the World Economic Forum and their vision to use crises to reconstruct the world order known as The Great Reset. The recent WEF summit in Davos confirms what Glenn has long warned about: globalist elites seek to upend our democracy, freedoms, and way of life to achieve their utopian climate goals. Here are 15 quotes from the 2023 Davos Summit, revealing their true intentions in their own words:

1. Saving the planet

When you hear the word, "Davos," the first thought that should pop into your mind is an elite group getting together to save the world from imminent climate disaster... at least they think of themselves that way. According to John Kerry:

I mean, it's so almost extraterrestrial to think about saving the planet.

2. Private jets

What most people think when they hear the word "Davos" is a group of global elites flying in on private jets to talk about climate change... and yes, John Kerry does own a private jet, no matter how many times he denies it:

I fly commercial [...] Exclusively.

3. Global Collaboration Village

You always hear some weird, dystopian projects coming out of WEF, like "The Global Collaboration Village," a new metaverse community aimed at strengthening "global cooperation." It sounds like the next installment of Brave New World. According to Klaus Schwab, Founder and President of the WEF:

The Global Collaboration Village is the pioneering effort to use the metaverse for public good, to create global cooperation and to strengthen global cooperation in the metaverse or using metaverse technologies. For me, it's a dream coming true because the village allows the Forum to create a more larger and open platform where everybody can participate.

4. Climate revolution

However, the core theme throughout WEF summits is the immediate need for a climate revolution and how businesses are selfishly blocking the revolution because they want to make an extra buck. Here's how John Kerry summed up the sentiment:

How do we get there? The lesson I have learned in the last years [...] is money, money, money, money, money, money, money.

5. Do or die

This often turns into alarmist language, like having to choose between wealth and our planet's survival... Joyeeta Gupta, Professor of Environment and Development in the Global South at University of Amsterdam, said it eloquently:

If we do the minimum at this pivotable moment in our history, then we and our children – even if we are rich – will live in the danger zone. But if we – business people, governments, citizens, cities – take action today, then we and our children will have a future worth looking forward to.

6. Colossal risks

Potsdam Institute's director Johan Rockström, used similar language, claiming we are "taking colossal risks with the future of civilization":

We are taking colossal risks with the future of civilization on Earth, we are degrading the life support systems that we all depend on, we are actually pushing the entire Earth system to a point of destabilization, pushing Earth outside of the state that has supported civilization since we left the last Ice Age 10,000 years ago.

7. Rain bombs

"Colossal risks" like... rain bombs? We didn't make that up. Ask Al Gore:

That’s what’s boiling the oceans, creating these atmospheric rivers, and the rain bombs.

Courtesy of the World Economic Forum

8. Survival comes down to this

How do we secure our survival? According to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, we have to "end our addiction to fossil fuels." This entails wiping out our entire energy industry, displacing millions of workers, and relying on global governments to usher in a new green industry. In his words:

So, we need to act together to close the emissions gap, and that means to phase out progressively coal and supercharge the renewable revolution, to end the addiction to fossil fuels, and to stop our self-defeating war on nature.

9. Complete transformation

It isn't hyperbolic to argue that the globalist climate goals will completely transform the world economy. Even EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen admitted:

The net-zero transformation is already causing huge industrial, economic and geopolitical shifts – by far the quickest and the most pronounced in our lifetime. It is changing the nature of work and the shape of our industry.

10. Scientific necessity

Of course, to bring about this "net-zero" transformation, we will have to override small, "political expediencies" like democracy to do what is "scientifically necessary." According to Zurich Insurance Group’s head of sustainability risk John Scott:

We’re living in a world right now where what’s scientifically necessary, and what is politically expedient don’t match.

11. Illegal hate speech

Doing away with "political expediencies" would also require the censorship of dissent, which would likely manifest in hate-speech laws. When asked by Brian Stelter how the discussion of disinformation relates to everything else happening today in Davos, European Commission VP Věra Jourová shared this prediction:

Illegal hate speech, which you will have soon also in the U.S. I think that we have a strong reason why we have this in the criminal law.

12. Climate first

We will also have to forego national interests on the international stage. America won't be able to advocate for policies and interests that benefit Americans. Instead, we will sacrifice national interests for the sake of global climate interests. French economy minister Bruno Le Maire said:

The key question is not China First, US First, Europe First. The key question for all of us is Climate First.

13. The role of war

We can also expect globalist leaders to use crises, like the war in Ukraine, to expedite the "net-zero transformation." Chancellor of Germany Olaf Scholz said:

Ultimately, our goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2045 has been given an additional boost by Putin’s war. Now we have even more cause to move away from fossil fuels.

14. Blame game

Globalist leaders will continue to blame ALL of the crises in our society on climate change to justify the "net-zero transition," from the energy shortage to "mistrust, selfishness [and] xenophobia." Prime Minister of Spain Pedro Sanchez said:

Our present struggle is not only against Putin or the energy shortage. It is also against fear, mistrust, selfishness, xenophobia, and environmental disaster. And its outcome will define life in the West and beyond for decades to come.

15. Sacrifice for the greater good

While we sacrifice our national interests for the sake of the "greater global good," we can expect our foreign enemies, like China, to benefit. Suisse Chairman Axel Lehmann said:

The growth forecasts now for China is 4.5%. I would not personally be surprised when that would be topped.

Conclusion

Glenn has been clear about the distinction between wanting to transition to green practices on your own accord and being forced into that transition by globalist, unelected elites. Leaders at Davos will continue to use alarmist language to justify their crackdown on democracy and freedom to bring about their leftist utopia. We have to cut through the alarmist language and in order to protect our freedoms.

Glenn has focused on exposing the dark side of the gender movements waging our culture war, and now, there's a new "trend" emerging as an offshoot to the transgender movement. A growing online community, particularly of men, who consider themselves "involuntarily celibate" or "incels" believe they can live a better life as a trans woman. Why? This community purports the world is rigged against men, particularly against traditionally "unattractive men." What's the solution? Stop being a man...

Incel or "involutarily celibate" communities have existed online in the dark corners of Reddit and Discord for years. The groups are marked by a hatred towards women, blaming them for rigging the world in their favor and denying them of sex. Several members of this growing community have been responsible for large acts of violence, most notably Alek Minassian, who killed 10 and injured 16 after driving a van into a busy area of Toronto in 2021.

However, the transgender movement has presented a new option for incel members: if you can't beat 'em, join 'em... or, in the Transmaxxers' case, "become them."

The online Transmaxxer's Manifesto says, “Since females have the upper hand on the dating market, transitioning from male to female will usually improve your options when it comes to getting sex.” According to the manifesto, transitioning to female not only opens up a different pool of sexual partners, but moreover, you gain access to female-only spaces and are “able to extract resources from males.”

“Since females have the upper hand on the dating market, transitioning from male to female will usually improve your options when it comes to getting sex.”

Another member wrote, "If you do not currently feel like living as a female you might have to work on fixing that ... Identifying as male or being emotionally attached to a male body is bad for you if being male results in you living a bad life.”

This new movement is significant because it is in stark contrast to the mainstream narrative that "transgenderism" is an innate quality. Now, it can be an "option" people choose for social advantage. A moderator going by the alias “Vintologi” on the Transmaxxing Discord server, which boasts over 1,200 members, told The Daily Caller:

Transmaxxing is about transitioning for personal gain rather than focusing on things like "gender identity." ... What matters when it comes to medical transition is whether or not said transition would actually be beneficial, thus the extent to which gender identity is innate does not inform us much regarding when medical transition is appropriate.

One incel member on Reddit lamented that he can't Transmaxx to "have sex with white trans women" and to have "all the benefits of [being] female."

Transmaxxing sheds light on a concerning issue as an increasing number of people, particularly the youth, identify as "transgender." What used to be considered as a "finge case" is now being seen as a social advantage. Glenn recently sat down with de-transitioner Chloe Cole, and the amount of pressure she experienced to become a transgender man AS A TEENAGER was ASTOUNDING. She discussed the new community, friendships, and affirmation she gained when she started her transition journey, and she lost ALL of those social perks when she began de-transitioning. She exchanged affirmation for death-threats, friendships for stone-cold silence.

Transmaxxing is a very specific example of a larger movement that is deeply concerning. Not only is the thansgender ideology problematic on its own merits, but now, we are seeing a rise of a distinction of "social advantage" based on gender affiliation. This is deviating away from the original notion that transgenderism is an innate quality. Now, many consider it more "socially advantageous" to identify as transgender than with your biological gender.

At the same time President Biden's misplaced classified documents were sitting in his house, garage, and office at the Penn Biden Center, a whole lot of Chinese money was flowing around him. Is this just a coincidence, or did the Chinese get anything in return? Investigative journalist John Solomon joins to break down what was going on here ...

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.