Glenn Beck: Obama/Biden pro segregation?

GLENN: Joe Biden is kind of under fire right now because the people in Iraq are really unhappy with him. Apparently he is one of the only guys who can get the Sunnis and the Shias and the Kurds to actually agree. Unfortunately it's not really in a good way. It is on his proposal to divide Iraq into three separate states based on racial and religious boundaries, okay? What he did now, this is a year ago. The Senate passed a proposal. It was his proposal calling for an international conference on dividing up Iraq. So let's just think about this now. What we wanted to do is divide up Iraq into three separate states but the Biden said not only that, not only did he want to do that, he wanted to call on the people who were against us in the Iraq war in the first place to come and now help solve and divide the power in Iraq. That sounds like a good proposal. By the way, Obama didn't vote. So he's not on the record.

All right. So now Iraq is saying this guy is a nightmare. He's the guy this is the last guy that the Democrats should be picking for their vice presidential nominee. The head of Iraq said that the Biden plan would be a disaster for Iraq. Not only a disaster for Iraq but the entire region. Now, here's what I find interesting. As I understand this, as I understand this proposal, the vice presidential nominee of the one that was selected by the first African American is actually for segregation. Not only did he propose segregation and it's not just segregation. It's not like they just go home what he proposes is forced segregation. So if you're of a different race, you've got to move up north and you have to I mean, just move you out of your home and you've got to move up north. He's not only for segregation, he's for forced segregation and Barack Obama is neutral on it.

STU: That is fantastic. And this comes from the campaign, as you know, who is I mean, there have been some questions about their comments about both Indians and Muslims. So really

GLENN: Well, I don't know if there's any question. I mean, play the no, no, play the do we have the Joe Biden question?

STU: Yes, we do here.

GLENN: All right. Play the audio of Joe Biden. How could you possibly say this is a guy who's making racist comments? Here we go.

STU: Here we go.

REPORTER: In Delaware the largest growth of population is Indian Americans, moving from India. You cannot go to a 7 11 or a Dunkin' Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent.

GLENN: That is and how true it is. You know, I was talking to Bobby Jindal the other day and I said, you know, Governor, let me talk to you about something by the way, can you just get me a Slurpee? Tell me about you've got to be kidding me, you've got to be Indian. Barack Obama, he would never make a racist comment like that... would he?

OBAMA: We don't always catch the right person. We may think this is Mohammed the terrorist. It might be Mohammed the cabdriver.

GLENN: Ooh, stop. Oh, oh, oh. Just a minute, hang on. So Mohammed the terrorist, are you saying that are you saying that Muslims are terrorists?

STU: The terrorists or cabdrivers.

GLENN: Just leaving it open to they could also be a cabdriver. Well, that's very open minded. That's very, very good.

STU: It's so fun to be on the liberal side of the argument because you could just, you could take any one of their comments and just, "Oh, well, I mean, he's saying terrorists are cabdrivers."

GLENN: No, Stu, it's not just their words. I mean, I know their intent.

STU: Yeah. If you look at their policies.

GLENN: If you look at their policies. Are you telling me a guy who is for segregation, forced segregation based on race and religion, you're telling me that the guy who says, you know, Mohammed the cabdriver, Mohammed the driver, you're telling me he didn't know what he was doing? He selected the guy who was for forced segregation based on race and religion.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: Of course he knew what he was saying.

STU: If it was just that comment, we wouldn't say anything. But there's such a long history of policy that you can't ignore the obvious racism here. (Laughing).

GLENN: (Laughing). Can't? You could not write this, you couldn't write this stuff. This is fantastic. I just love it. And I swear to you I don't know who's running for President anymore. I really don't. Joe Biden is suddenly invisible.

Americans are losing faith in our justice system and the idea that legal consequences are applied equally — even to powerful elites in office.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to detail what he believes will come next with the Durham investigation, which hopefully will provide answers to the Obama FBI's alleged attempts to sabotage former President Donald Trump and his campaign years ago.

Rep. Nunes and Glenn assert that we know Trump did NOT collude with Russia, and that several members of the FBI possibly committed huge abuses of power. So, when will we see justice?

Watch the video clip below:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The corporate media is doing everything it can to protect Dr. Anthony Fauci after Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) roasted him for allegedly lying to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

During an extremely heated exchange at a Senate hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Paul challenged Dr. Fauci — who, as the director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, oversees research programs at the National Institute of Health — on whether the NIH funded dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Dr. Fauci denied the claims, but as Sen. Paul knows, there are documents that prove Dr. Fauci's NIH was funding gain-of-function research in the Wuhan biolab before COVID-19 broke out in China.

On "The Glenn Beck Program," Glenn and Producer Stu Burguiere presented the proof, because Dr. Fauci's shifting defenses don't change the truth.

Watch the video clip below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Critical race theory: A special brand of evil

wal_172619/Pixabay

Part of what makes it hard for us to challenge the left is that their beliefs are complicated. We don't mean complicated in a positive way. They aren't complicated the way love is complicated. They're complicated because there's no good explanation for them, no basis in reality.

The left cannot pull their heads out of the clouds. They are stuck on romantic ideas, abstract ideas, universal ideas. They talk in theories. They see the world through ideologies. They cannot divorce themselves from their own academic fixations. And — contrary to what they believe and how they act — it's not because leftists are smarter than the rest of us. And studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country. Marx was no different. The Communist Manifesto talks about how the rise of cities "rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life."

Studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country.

Instead of admitting that they're pathological hypocrites, they tell us that we're dumb and tell us to educate ourselves. Okay, so we educate ourselves; we return with a coherent argument. Then they say, "Well, you can't actually understand what you just said unless you understand the work of this other obscure Marxist writer. So educate yourselves more."

It's basically the "No True Scotsman" fallacy, the idea that when you point out a flaw in someone's argument, they say, "Well, that's a bad example."

After a while, it becomes obvious that there is no final destination for their bread-crumb trail. Everything they say is based on something that somebody else said, which is based on something somebody else said.

Take critical race theory. We're sure you've noticed by now that it is not evidence-based — at all. It is not, as academics say, a quantitative method. It doesn't use objective facts and data to arrive at conclusions. Probably because most of those conclusions don't have any basis in reality.

Critical race theory is based on feelings. These feelings are based on theories that are also based on feelings.

We wanted to trace the history of critical race theory back to the point where its special brand of evil began. What allowed it to become the toxic, racist monster that it is today?

Later, we'll tell you about some of the snobs who created critical theory, which laid the groundwork for CRT. But if you follow the bread-crumb trail from their ideas, you wind up with Marxism.

For years, the staff has devoted a lot of time to researching Marxism. We have read a lot of Marx and Marxist writing. It's part of our promise to you to be as informed as possible, so that you know where to go for answers; so that you know what to say when your back is up against the wall. What happens when we take the bread-crumb trail back farther, past Marxism? What is it based on?

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism.

It's actually based on the work of one of the most important philosophers in human history, a 19th-century German philosopher named Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism. And, as you'll see in just a bit, if we look at Hegel's actual ideas, it's obvious that Marx completely misrepresented them in order to confirm his own fantasies.

So, in a way, that's where the bread-crumb trail ends: With Marx's misrepresentation of an incredibly important, incredibly useful philosophy, a philosophy that's actually pretty conservative.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.

We've heard a lot about critical race theory lately, and for good reason: It's a racist ideology designed to corrupt our children and undermine our American values. But most of what we see are the results of a process that has been underway for decades. And that's not something the mainstream media, the Democrat Party, and even teachers unions want you to know. They're doing everything in their power to try and convince you that it's no big deal. They want to sweep everything under the rug and keep you in the dark. To fight it, we need to understand what fuels it.

On his Wednesday night special this week, Glenn Beck exposes the deep-seated Marxist origins of CRT and debunks the claims that it's just a harmless term for a school of legal scholarship. Newsweek opinion editor Josh Hammer joins to argue why we must ban critical race theory from our schools if we want to save a very divided nation.

Watch the full "Glenn TV" episode below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.