Glenn Beck: Matt Damon humiliates himself


[youtube http://www.youtube.com/v/qmnbTBCktoM&hl=en&fs=1 expand=1]


Rep. Cohen (D) Compares Obama to Jesus, Palin To Pontius Pilate

GLENN: Let me go to Steve Cohen. This is the congressman from Tennessee. I just want you to hear this. And Dan, include this in our free e mail newsletter today, will you?

DAN: Sure thing.

GLENN: I want you to see this because this is on the floor of the House. He is not saying this at a press conference. He's on the floor of the House of Representatives and here's what representative Steve Cohen has said, if you thought the pig with lipstick thing was bad and you could dismiss that&say, oh, well, he was just talking about the policies and he didn't really realize what he was saying because she had that famous line about the pit bull in lipstick, he didn't put those two together. If you want to explain that, that's fine. Okay. Just, to me that just shows how bad his judgment is, but that's fine. Try to talk your way around this from Democratic congressman Steve Cohen.

COHEN: But if you want change, you want the Democratic party, Barack Obama was a community organizer like Jesus who our minister prayed about, Pontius Pilate was the governor.

GLENN: Let me play that again for all of? ?for all of you liberals out there who might be saying that Sarah Palin is some sort of a religious zealot, there's an amazing story that I have seen that goes into exactly what she believes, what her church believes, the philosophy of her church, all of the tenets of her church. And I thought to myself, that is really, really weird because I have yet to see that on Obama's church. Because if you read just the website of his? ?I'm sorry? ?former church, that he could no sooner disavow than he could his own family but then, oh, wait a minute, let me disavow it, if the media would just report what's on the website alone, America would be horrified, horrified because it has nothing to do with religion. It has everything to do with Marxism. It has everything to do with hate the white man. Believe me, check out the website yourself.

Let me play it again and ask you the question, "Where's the media on this?" No double standard? Really? This was said yesterday.

COHEN: But if you want change, you want the Democratic party, Barack Obama was a community organizer like Jesus who our minister prayed about, Pontius Pilate was a governor.

GLENN: Imagine if Sarah Palin would compare Barack Obama to the guy who killed Jesus Christ, can you imagine what would be said in this country, you tell me that a news cycle would go for 18 hours before you would have heard and seen the picture. You tell me this wouldn't lead the news on every channel. I don't care if it's 9/11, they would have led the news every single station if Sarah Palin would have? ?or any of her surrogates or anyone on the House of Representatives on the floor, any congressman would have said Barack Obama is just like the guy who killed Jesus Christ. Can you imagine the outcry? Because you're not going to hear it, you know, except for talk radio, you're not going to see it except for my show tonight guaranteed 7:00, 7:00, 9:00, 12:00 and 5:00 a.m., we guarantee that you'll see it four times, let me play it one for time.

COHEN: But if you want change, you want the Democratic party, Barack Obama was a community organizer like Jesus who our minister prayed about, Pontius Pilate was a governor.

[youtube http://www.youtube.com/v/anxkrm9uEJk&hl=en&fs=1 expand=1]


Matt Damon talks about Sarah Palin...

GLENN: Okay. So there he is, comparing Barack Obama to Jesus Christ and the guy who killed Jesus Christ as Sarah Palin ooh. Whoa, what a religious zealot. We should be afraid of all religious zealots. Not like Steve Cohen but religious zealots like Sarah Palin. Why do I say we should be afraid of religious zealots? Well, let me give you the next piece of audio, this one from Matt Damon today.

DAMON: I think there's a really good chance that Sarah Palin could be President and I think that's a really scary thing because I don't know anything about her. I don't think in eight weeks I'm going to know anything about her. I know that she was a mayor of a really, really small town and she's governor of Alaska for less than two years. I just don't understand. I think the pick was made for political purposes, but in terms of governance it's a disaster.

GLENN: Okay, stop for a second. Stop for a second. I just want to get? ?Stu, will you help me get the qualifications down. A mayor of a really small town, then she was a governor for less than two years.

STU: Right.

GLENN: And then she was picked for politically correct purposes or what was it he said?

STU: He said political purposes, it was just a political pick, woman or whatever.

GLENN: Picked for political purposes. Okay. Go ahead.

DAMON: You do the actuary tables, you know, there's a one out of three chance, if not more, that McCain doesn't survive his first term and it will be? ?

GLENN: Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Whoa. Whoa. Whew. I can't imagine predicting Obama's death. Wow, I can't imagine even saying that. Whoa. But now we're predicting John McCain's death. I'm sorry. I'm not an actuary but I am a thinker. Is there an actual actuary out there that can tell me the one in three chance that John McCain has of not finishing his first term? I'm sorry. Is he also a geneticist? Have you seen his mother? She moves faster than I do. She's like 900 years old.

STU: Hey, Glenn.

GLENN: Yes.

STU: I don't know if we can get an actuary to help us with this, too. I think he's right. If he's right with the first step of it that it's a 33% chance that he might become President, can someone help us with the percent chance if Obama wins that he will become President? Because I think that one is even higher than that. I believe it's somewhere around 100%, and he has no experience. So? ?

GLENN: Wait a minute. Wait, wait, wait. What are you saying? 100%, he's saying? ?

STU: I'm saying if Obama were to win, what are the chances of him becoming President?

GLENN: Who?

STU: Barack Obama. Because I know that if the 33% chance that McCain won't make it through his entire first term according to Mr.?Actuary Matt Damon, I'm just curious to see the guy who, you know, Mr.?Barack Obama, the guy with that vast experience, what will the chances be if he wins?

GLENN: Yeah, okay. Well, let me get back to the experience and the 100% chance experience here in just a second. Again it's judgment, not experience, but let's go ahead and do that experience? ?or that, you know, that whole argument on experience coming up in a second.

Okay. So I need an actuary on the phone to give me the one in three chance that John McCain won't make it through his first term and then go ahead and listen to the rest of Matt Damon here.

DAMON: And it will be President Palin and really, you know, we were talking about it earlier. It's? ?

GLENN: Hold on. Just stop for a second. I don't? ?look. You just have to understand what you're about to hear. He's smarter than you, okay? He's much smarter than you. He has much more experience than you. He's an actor. Do you know how many roles he's played? Do you know how many jobs he's actually held down? I mean, he's never been, you know, a CEO of a company, but he's played that in many, many roles. He's never been a thief, but he's played that. Do you know that he was actually successful in helping pull off one of the biggest heists, in fact the only time anyone's ever gotten away with a heist in Las Vegas, he was part of that team. Okay, he didn't actually do it, but he's played it. So he knows how to do it. He's smarter than you are. So try not to? ?just try to remember that because he's going to sound a little condescending here.

DAMON: It's like a really bad Disney movie, you know? The hockey mom, you know, "Oh, I'm just a hockey mom from Alaska," and she's the President and it's like she's facing down Vladimir Putin and, you know, using the folksy stuff she learned at the hockey rink. It's just, it's absurd.

GLENN: Stop for a second. Can you go back and take this again? I want you to listen to two things. It's like we were talking before. So in other words, they've had this conversation. So this is not something off the top of his head. He has already had this conversation with the member of the media before they started recording. So this is almost rehearsed, and I want you to also hear, listen carefully for the member of the media laughing in the background when, oh, she's just a hockey mom. Listen to it again.

DAMON: You know, we were talking about it earlier. It's like a really bad Disney movie, you know? The hockey mom, you know, "Oh, I'm just a hockey mom from Alaska," and she's the President. And it's like she's facing down Vladimir Putin and? ?

GLENN: Stop just a second. Hey, hockey moms, sorry. "I'm just a hockey mom." But remember, remember it's the left that respects you. It's the left that respects you. Joe Biden, he's just like you. He's Joe six pack. He's Joe lunch bucket. You know, he's a guy who is just like you. He is a working man. He's had all of your experiences because you want somebody that is a working man, but you're just a? ?you're just a hockey mom! By the way, it gets even better.

DAMON: You know, the folksy stuff she learned at the hockey rink, it's just, it's absurd. It's totally absurd and I don't understand why more people aren't talking about how absurd it is. It's a really terrifying possibility. The fact that we've gotten this far and we're that close to this being a reality is crazy. Crazy. I mean, does she really? ?I need to know if she really thinks dinosaurs were here 4,000 years ago. That's an important? ?I want to know that. I really do. Because she's going to have the nuclear codes, you know? I want to know if she thinks dinosaurs were here 4,000 years ago or if she banned books or tried to ban books. I mean, you know, we can't have that.

GLENN: Okay. Just a quote from Matt Damon. Last month he said, "For a lot of actors our biggest fear is that we're going to start talking about things we don't fully understand and sound like idiots. In the long run I'll do much more good if when I open my mouth I have something worth saying." So apparently this is something he believes is worth saying. All right. So he wants to know if she believes that there were dinosaurs on the Earth 4,000 years ago. He's got a problem with that. He wants to know. She's going to have the nuclear codes. He hates people with, you know, with any kind of religious conviction, you know, anybody saying, "Hey, I believe in the Bible," you know. Hate those people. Hate those people. Got to know that.

But let me go back to Steve Cohen again. Could you just play the audio of Steve Cohen?

COHEN: But if you want change, you want the Democratic party, Barack Obama was a community organizer like Jesus who our minister prayed about. Pontius Pilate was a governor.

GLENN: Okay, good. Because boy, I'm with you, Matt. I hate those religious zealots. Whew, those people are crazy. They're dangerous. They're dangerous. You would hate to give? ?you would hate to give Pontius Pilate the nuclear codes but let's make sure Jesus has them.

Now, I want to go back to the Matt Damon part where he says she was a mayor of a really, really small town. She was governor for less than two years and she was picked for political purposes. Let's just compare resumes. Stu, help me out on this, will you?

STU: Sure.

GLENN: Barack Obama, ever a mayor of a really, really small town?

STU: He's seen? ?he watched Northern Exposure.

GLENN: He's watched Northern Exposure.

STU: Which, that's about? ?

GLENN: So he was never a mayor, but he was a community organizer. Community organizer, they do a lot.

STU: Hold on one more second, Glenn, because I want to make sure I understand this because according to the governor of New York, what you just said is he's black.

GLENN: Yes. Well, he's black.

STU: You said he was black.

GLENN: Let me just, let me just get to the black part a little bit later.

STU: Oh, okay.

GLENN: Let's just focus on the mayor thing. He was a community organizer. She was a mayor. Okay. Got it. Then, she was governor for less? ?she's been governor for less than two years, he said. And then she was governor for, what, less than two years. Dan, do you happen to have the date when Matt Damon endorsed Obama?

DAN: Yes. Of course, that was December 19th, 2006.

GLENN: I'm sorry, what? December 19th, last year?

STU: No, no. December 9th, 2006. Before he announced his candidacy.

GLENN: Before he announced his candidacy even.

STU: December 19th, 2006.

GLENN: 2006? Well, wait a minute. When was? ?well, how long had Barack Obama? ?

STU: He was sworn in January 2005, Glenn.

GLENN: January? ?

STU: Do you need your calculator? That's what?

STU: That's less than two years.

GLENN: He was in the Senate for less than two years when Matt Damon endorsed him.

STU: I don't know if that's true because he's already on record saying he wouldn't endorse someone who had less than two years experience. That can't be true. You are going to have to check your numbers.

GLENN: Okay.

STU: Can you just run those numbers through the mega? ?

GLENN: Let's just stop thinking about that, okay? And then she was picked for political purposes. What do you suppose that means?

STU: She's not qualified and he just needs a woman and she's just, she's just a woman for woman sake.

GLENN: She's a woman, so maybe they can get some votes and use the woman thing.

DAN: She's a lipstick, Glenn.

GLENN: Right. She might be giving? ?she gives good speeches. We know that, right? But that's really about pretty much it. That and having breasts. That's all that matters.

STU: That's political purposes.

GLENN: Okay. Okay, all right. Hey, when did everybody get really excited about Barack Obama?

STU: I think? ?

GLENN: Oh, I remember. Wasn't it? ?it was right after he gave that really good speech for the Democratic convention. I remember that.

STU: 2004 that was, yeah.

GLENN: You know, I haven't even? ?you know, you brought this up earlier, Stu, that he's black. I never even noticed that he was black. Do you think the American people know? Do you think the Democrats noticed that he was black? Do you think there's a possibility that him? ?there couldn't have. I've never, ever heard this on how important it is that we elect our first black President. I've never heard that.

STU: Hasn't mentioned yet.

GLENN: I haven't heard that. So Matt Damon, you are right. I see how different these two candidates really are when we use your standard. And then, of course, you're right, those religious zealots that? ?what was the Republican that is from Tennessee that was the congressman that? ?

STU: Oh, yes. Congressman, he's from Tennessee.

GLENN: He's a Republican congressman.

STU: Republican who's? ?

GLENN: Oh, no, wait a minute. Hang on just a second. He wasn't. Hang on, can you play the audio again, please?

COHEN: But if you want change, you want the Democratic party, Barack Obama was a community organizer like Jesus who our minister prayed about. Pontius Pilate was a governor.

GLENN: Good thing you guys have the high ground.

Tapping the brakes on transgenderism in 2023

Hunter Martin / Contributor | Getty Images

2022 was the year of the emperor’s new clothes—where we were supposed to pretend that someone like Lia Thomas is a woman, legitimately beating actual women in swimming competitions. This carpet-bombing of common sense won’t be letting up anytime soon. Just before the New Year, the World Boxing Council announced that it’s going to create a separate category for transgender boxers. The WBC president said:

we are doing this because of safety and inclusion. We have been the leaders in rules for women’s boxing—so the dangers of a man fighting a woman will never happen because of what we are going to put in place.

After all the insanity you’ve been told to accept about transgender athletes in recent years, his statement is remarkable. He’s admitting what common sense people have been saying all along—that trans athletes identifying as women still carry natural physical advantages (from the fact that they’re actually male), and that those natural advantages could endanger biological women.

Trans athletes identifying as women still carry natural physical advantages.

The WBC president went on to say:

In boxing, a man fighting a woman must never be accepted regardless of gender change. There should be no gray area around this, and we want to go into it with transparency and the correct decisions. Woman to man or man to woman transgender change will never be allowed to fight a different gender by birth.

Maybe the WBC is on to something here. Maybe the only way to solve the stupidity of letting biological males play female sports is to create a separate transgender category in every sport. That would make competition fair again. However, the trans agenda will never accept this because it doesn’t validate their transition—in fact, it admits that these are not authentically female athletes.

There is some rare, good news on this front. In late December, the Eleventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals voted to uphold a Florida school-board policy that requires transgender students to use the bathroom of their biological sex. Of course, the Left won’t accept this, so this case will probably go to the Supreme Court sooner than later. You’re supposed to always believe the science, except when it comes to your own body parts.

You’re supposed to always believe the science, except when it comes to your own body parts.

And by the way, if the Left truly cared about unbiased science as it pertains to transgenderism, they’d listen to their favorite European country, Sweden. Sweden’s national board of health recently updated its guidelines on treating children with gender dysphoria. Unlike the Biden administration and the U.S. medical establishment right now, Sweden’s new emphasis is caution:

the scientific data is INSUFFICIENT to assess the effects of puberty-inhibiting and gender-sensitive hormone therapy of children and young people.

The Swedish guidelines also mention the prevalence of de-transition cases as another reason for tapping the brakes on sex-change surgeries for children.

Common sense apparently does still exist, even in places like Sweden. If only America would listen.

Glenn wants to dive deep into different philosophical topics this year. As CRT and woke curricula are demonizing the "western tradition," it is vitally important that we preserve the tradition that gave birth our nation and gives context to the culture we live in today. Here are the top 11 books to give you a crash course in the western philosophic tradition. If you don't have the time to read them, you can find an overview to each of the books below!

1. Plato's Republic

The first titan of Greek philosophy, Plato articulated the set of questions that would drive the future western philosophical tradition. The pre-eminent question among Greek philosophers was "what is the thing that explains everything." In philosophical lingo, this question is framed as "what is the logos or the good." Plato argued that reality could be explained in terms of the "forms." For example, when you see multiple examples of a "courageous" act, then, Plato would argue, there is such a thing as "courage." The form of "the good" is the form that gives meaning to all of reality. Humans use their rational minds to contemplate what is good and then align their desires to "the good" in order to pursue it.

2. Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

The second titan of Greek philosophy was none other than Aristotle, who was a student of Plato. Aristotle deviated from his teacher's claims about "forms" and instead argued that every single thing has a purpose, a telos. For example, the telos of a chair is to provide a place for someone to sit. In the same way that a chair's purpose is to provide a place for someone to sit, Aristotle argues that the telos of human beings is to pursue happiness.

In the first page of the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle claims that every action is done for the sake of pursuing happiness, although, all too often, our actions are misplaced. We often pursue things we believe will make us happy when, in reality, they are fleeting, momentary pleasures that result in despair, heartbreak, or pain. Rather than conforming the world around us to fit our momentary desires, Aristotle argues that we achieve happiness by understanding the nature of the world around us and how we fit into it by actively cultivating virtues in order to make our soul "fit to be happy." Work and action, therefore, are not mere moral "to-do lists," but rather bring us fulfillment.

3. Augustine's City of God

If Plato is the first titan of ancient philosophy, then Augustine is the first titan of medieval philosophy. Medieval philosophy begins with the re-discovery of ancient philosophical texts that had been lost throughout the Roman Empire. As Christianity had taken root and spread across the western world, medieval philosophy integrated these newly-discovered texts into Christian theology. Augustine is the pre-eminent medieval Neo-platonic philosopher, incorporating Plato's philosophy into Christian theology.

Augustine claimed that God himself is the ultimate "form" or "the good" from which all of reality derives its meaning and existence. A thing is "good" insofar as it coalesces with the way God intended it to be. When a thing stays away from God's intention, it is "not good." From this, we get the Augustinian definition of "evil" as a "privation" or "absence of goodness," which ultimately corresponds to God's nature and character.

4. Aquinas' Summa Theologica

Just as Augustine incorporated Plato's philosophy into Christian theology, the second medieval titan, Thomas Aquinas, incorporated Aristotelian philosophy into Christian theology. Building from Aristotle, Aquinas argues that Christ is our happiness, the longing of every human heart and the object of every human action. Though we may think we are pursuing happiness outside of Christ, our this pursuit is misplaced and will result in fleeting pleasure and pain. True happiness and fulfillment, Aquinas argues, is found in Christ himself and the pursuit of his nature.

**Note: Aquinas' Summa is one of the largest works ever written and contains arguments about many different subjects--there are concise versions that will save you a lot of time!

5. Francis Bacon's Novem Organum

If medieval philosophy is defined by the incorporation of ancient philosophy into orthodox Christian theology, then the Enlightenment is defined as the rejection of both. English philosopher Francis Bacon kicked off the Enlightenment with a total rejection of the Aristotelian view of reality. The title of his book, the Novum Organum, or "the new order," is a deliberate tease of Aristotle's Organon, or "the order of things." Bacon's "new order" purports that, contrary to Aristotle, there is no inherent "nature" or "purpose" in reality. Rather, reality is something that we can conquer by means of knowledge and force, dissecting nature to its fundamental parts and reconstructing it into what we want. Bacon is considered the father of the scientific method, creating a testable means through which we can understand, break down and re-construct nature.

6. Descartes' Discourse on Method

Descartes is best known for his famous assertion, cogito ergo sum, or "I think, therefore, I am." In Discourse on Method, Descartes embarks on a rigorous endeavor to doubt anything that can be doubted. He postulates that all of reality can be doubted; however, the one thing that cannot be doubted, he concludes, is that there must be someonewho is doubting. Though we may think that we are in the matrix, we are thinking, therefore, we must exist.

Descartes's rigorous skepticism introduced a brand-new burden of truth. In order for something to be true, it must be beyond all reasonable doubt. Many continue to use Descartes' skepticism as a way to challenge religious belief. According to these modern-day skeptics, unless you can prove that God exists beyond any reasonable doubt, there is no way to actually know whether he exists. The severing of knowledge and faith is often attributed to Descartes.

7. David Hume's Treatise on Human Nature

Scottish philosopher David Hume took aim at both Plato and Aristotle. One of his most famous and consequential claims about human nature is, "reason is and always ought to be slave of the passions." This took direct aim at Plato's view of human nature. Plato argued that our reason or "rationality" should always rule our passions so that we will desire what is good. Hume flips this on its head, claiming that our reason is helplessly enslaved to our passions and will inevitably justify what we will already want. From this, Hume introduced a new articulation of moral relativism, claiming that humans are not able to choose between what is good and what is evil, but rather will choose what they want over what they don't.

8. Kant's Contemplation on the Metaphysics of Morals

Hume's moral relativism sparked panic within German philosopher Immanuel Kant. If we will inevitably do what we desire, how can we ever choose to do something good and moral for its own sake? We must, according to Kant, separate morality completely from the passions if it's to be saved. Kant, therefore, argues that duty is the highest good that man can aspire to. We do the right thing, not because we want to--on the contrary, we do the "right thing" because it's our duty to do so, especially when we don't want to. This breaks away from the Aristotelian notion that our happiness is inextricably intertwined with the pursuit of "the good."

9. Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil

Nietzsche wasn't convinced by either Hume or Kant's efforts to retain some semblance of civility or relativistic moral standard. According to Nietzsche, if there is no such thing as transcendent morality, then "moral maxims" are reduced to meaningless words purported by the people in power. Morality, therefore, becomes a game of persuasion at best, coercion and force at worst. People are reduced to winners and losers, opressors and victims, and whoever comes out on top gets to impose their desired view of the world on the losers. Therefore, the goal of the individual is to cultivate the "will to power," to become the powerful "ubermensch" or "superhuman," or else you will be reduced to a victim susceptible to other people's coercion and oppression.

10. C.S. Lewis's The Abolition of Man

After the Enlightenment ends in a grand, destructive finale with Nietzsche, Christian philosophers in the 20th century attempt to pick up the pieces and resurrect the ancient and medieval philosophies that had been cast to the side. In The Abolition of Man, C.S. Lewis famously laments that mankind has become "men without chests." This is a direct reference to Plato's view of human nature--there is nothing linking our mind to our heart. Intellectually, we have dissected all of reality into its individual bits, stripping it of its holistic beauty, while also succumbing to our whims and passions with no notion of a transcendent moral law. Lewis calls for the re-marriage of our minds and our hearts, so that we will not only pursue what is good, but moreover, we will desire to do so.

11. Alasdair McIntyre's After Virtue

The latter part of the 20th century saw the resurgence of Aristotelian ethics after being largely dismissed over the past 400 years during the Enlightenment. Scottish Catholic philosopher Alasdair McIntyre was and continues to be one of the foremost leaders of this movement. In his magnum opus, After Virtue, McIntyre takes aim at the entire Enlightenment project itself and shows how it ultimately fails by its own standards. If reality is a mere power dynamic, as Nietzsche argues, and if morality is an act of persuasion and passion, as Hume purports, then we have no reason to take their views seriously. If all of reality is relative, then the statement "reality is relative" is itself relative. It becomes victim of the self-refutation of its own standards. Transcendent morality, he argues, must exist, because there must be some standard by which we judge reality and can say with determination, "this is good" and "this is evil."

The Biden Admin EXPANDED abortion access because they DON'T believe in the Constitution

Joshua Lott / Stringer, JOSEPH PREZIOSO / Contributor | Getty Images

This month has already produced an extreme example of why we need a functional and more conservative Congress in order for America to have a chance at moving forward—because the Left does not believe in the Constitution.

Sure, if you confronted a Democrat in Congress, they would probably claim some sort of allegiance to the Constitution—but as a practical matter, they do not believe in it.

Instead, the Left has put all of their eggs in the basket of the executive branch. Why? Because it has the furthest reach through all the various departments, and it can move the fastest—in short, because it’s the most dictatorial. It only takes a department head to write a new memo, or even better, the President to sign a new executive order to carry the force of law.

The Left has put all of their eggs in the basket of the executive branch.

Do you recall any of the Left’s favorite Supreme Court decisions over the years—something like gay marriage for example—and how Republicans immediately tried to subvert it, using the executive branch to try to nullify the decision? Yeah, that never happened. But that is exactly what Democrats have done in recent weeks to expand abortion access.

Democrats only consider the Supreme Court legitimate when they approve of the decisions. When the miraculous overturning of Roe v. Wade happened last summer, President Biden called it “a realization of an extreme ideology and a tragic error by the Supreme Court.”

Democrats only consider the Supreme Court legitimate when they approve of the decisions.

Recently the FDA approved local pharmacies to issue abortion pills. For the first 20 years after these pills were developed, they were not treated like typical prescription drugs. They had to be dispensed in-person by a doctor. That in-person requirement is now gone.

Keep in mind that the Left’s go-to line is that abortion is always about the health and safety of women, yet a 2021 peer-reviewed study found that chemical abortions have a complication rate four times greater than surgical abortions. Between 2002 and 2015, the rate of abortion-related ER visits following use of the abortion pills increased by 507 percent.

Chemical abortions have a complication rate four times greater than surgical abortions.

And now the Biden administration is making these less-safe abortions much more accessible. Thanks to the FDA’s rule change, Walgreens and CVS have already agreed to dispense abortion pills in states where abortion is legal—effectively turning these stores into new abortion clinics.

As for states that have abortion bans, "Team Biden" announced a new way around those too. Three weeks ago, the Justice Department issued a legal opinion that the U.S. Postal Service is allowed to deliver abortion pills anywhere, even in places where abortion is illegal. What’s their rationale? That the sender cannot know for sure whether the recipient will use the pills illegally or not. So it’s totally okay.

The U.S. Postal Service is allowed to deliver abortion pills anywhere, even in places where abortion is illegal.

Georgetown Law professor Lawrence Gostin told the Washington Post that this Justice Department opinion is “a major expansion of abortion access in the United States.”

So, to recap—the Biden administration has used the FDA, the Justice Department, and the Post Office, which all fall under the executive branch, to provide an end-run around the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson decision.

Expanding abortion was easy—simple policy tweaks and declarations that carry the force of law without an ounce of input from actual lawmakers in Congress—all because it comes from the grotesque, bloated, apparently pro-death executive branch.

Glenn is one of the most outspoken critics of the World Economic Forum and their vision to use crises to reconstruct the world order known as The Great Reset. The recent WEF summit in Davos confirms what Glenn has long warned about: globalist elites seek to upend our democracy, freedoms, and way of life to achieve their utopian climate goals. Here are 15 quotes from the 2023 Davos Summit, revealing their true intentions in their own words:

1. Saving the planet

When you hear the word, "Davos," the first thought that should pop into your mind is an elite group getting together to save the world from imminent climate disaster... at least they think of themselves that way. According to John Kerry:

I mean, it's so almost extraterrestrial to think about saving the planet.

2. Private jets

What most people think when they hear the word "Davos" is a group of global elites flying in on private jets to talk about climate change... and yes, John Kerry does own a private jet, no matter how many times he denies it:

I fly commercial [...] Exclusively.

3. Global Collaboration Village

You always hear some weird, dystopian projects coming out of WEF, like "The Global Collaboration Village," a new metaverse community aimed at strengthening "global cooperation." It sounds like the next installment of Brave New World. According to Klaus Schwab, Founder and President of the WEF:

The Global Collaboration Village is the pioneering effort to use the metaverse for public good, to create global cooperation and to strengthen global cooperation in the metaverse or using metaverse technologies. For me, it's a dream coming true because the village allows the Forum to create a more larger and open platform where everybody can participate.

4. Climate revolution

However, the core theme throughout WEF summits is the immediate need for a climate revolution and how businesses are selfishly blocking the revolution because they want to make an extra buck. Here's how John Kerry summed up the sentiment:

How do we get there? The lesson I have learned in the last years [...] is money, money, money, money, money, money, money.

5. Do or die

This often turns into alarmist language, like having to choose between wealth and our planet's survival... Joyeeta Gupta, Professor of Environment and Development in the Global South at University of Amsterdam, said it eloquently:

If we do the minimum at this pivotable moment in our history, then we and our children – even if we are rich – will live in the danger zone. But if we – business people, governments, citizens, cities – take action today, then we and our children will have a future worth looking forward to.

6. Colossal risks

Potsdam Institute's director Johan Rockström, used similar language, claiming we are "taking colossal risks with the future of civilization":

We are taking colossal risks with the future of civilization on Earth, we are degrading the life support systems that we all depend on, we are actually pushing the entire Earth system to a point of destabilization, pushing Earth outside of the state that has supported civilization since we left the last Ice Age 10,000 years ago.

7. Rain bombs

"Colossal risks" like... rain bombs? We didn't make that up. Ask Al Gore:

That’s what’s boiling the oceans, creating these atmospheric rivers, and the rain bombs.

Courtesy of the World Economic Forum

8. Survival comes down to this

How do we secure our survival? According to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, we have to "end our addiction to fossil fuels." This entails wiping out our entire energy industry, displacing millions of workers, and relying on global governments to usher in a new green industry. In his words:

So, we need to act together to close the emissions gap, and that means to phase out progressively coal and supercharge the renewable revolution, to end the addiction to fossil fuels, and to stop our self-defeating war on nature.

9. Complete transformation

It isn't hyperbolic to argue that the globalist climate goals will completely transform the world economy. Even EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen admitted:

The net-zero transformation is already causing huge industrial, economic and geopolitical shifts – by far the quickest and the most pronounced in our lifetime. It is changing the nature of work and the shape of our industry.

10. Scientific necessity

Of course, to bring about this "net-zero" transformation, we will have to override small, "political expediencies" like democracy to do what is "scientifically necessary." According to Zurich Insurance Group’s head of sustainability risk John Scott:

We’re living in a world right now where what’s scientifically necessary, and what is politically expedient don’t match.

11. Illegal hate speech

Doing away with "political expediencies" would also require the censorship of dissent, which would likely manifest in hate-speech laws. When asked by Brian Stelter how the discussion of disinformation relates to everything else happening today in Davos, European Commission VP Věra Jourová shared this prediction:

Illegal hate speech, which you will have soon also in the U.S. I think that we have a strong reason why we have this in the criminal law.

12. Climate first

We will also have to forego national interests on the international stage. America won't be able to advocate for policies and interests that benefit Americans. Instead, we will sacrifice national interests for the sake of global climate interests. French economy minister Bruno Le Maire said:

The key question is not China First, US First, Europe First. The key question for all of us is Climate First.

13. The role of war

We can also expect globalist leaders to use crises, like the war in Ukraine, to expedite the "net-zero transformation." Chancellor of Germany Olaf Scholz said:

Ultimately, our goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2045 has been given an additional boost by Putin’s war. Now we have even more cause to move away from fossil fuels.

14. Blame game

Globalist leaders will continue to blame ALL of the crises in our society on climate change to justify the "net-zero transition," from the energy shortage to "mistrust, selfishness [and] xenophobia." Prime Minister of Spain Pedro Sanchez said:

Our present struggle is not only against Putin or the energy shortage. It is also against fear, mistrust, selfishness, xenophobia, and environmental disaster. And its outcome will define life in the West and beyond for decades to come.

15. Sacrifice for the greater good

While we sacrifice our national interests for the sake of the "greater global good," we can expect our foreign enemies, like China, to benefit. Suisse Chairman Axel Lehmann said:

The growth forecasts now for China is 4.5%. I would not personally be surprised when that would be topped.

Conclusion

Glenn has been clear about the distinction between wanting to transition to green practices on your own accord and being forced into that transition by globalist, unelected elites. Leaders at Davos will continue to use alarmist language to justify their crackdown on democracy and freedom to bring about their leftist utopia. We have to cut through the alarmist language and in order to protect our freedoms.