Glenn Beck: Flirting with socialism


Glenn Beck is seen here on the Insider Webcam, an exclusive feature available only to Glenn Beck Insiders. Learn more...

GLENN: I've told you before that I am against the bailouts because I'm a capitalist. I think if you were so stupid to give people without identification, if you were so stupid to give people without verifying their income $10, you're too stupid to be a global bank. I think you should fail. If you actually thought it would be better to open up branches in other markets and the only way you could do that was to play the game that the government was trying to play with you by accusing you of being racist for not asking for identification, you're not worthy of being a global leader in finance because I think you need to have some credibility. However, with all of this being said, I told you for the last how long, that this was coming. And you know what? Most people saw pieces of it but they didn't see how bad it was going to get. Everybody, who didn't really? Do you have a single friend that didn't say, "Wait a minute, they're giving you a 125% mortgage? Mao does that work? And you don't have to have any money down? You didn't have to have any identification? And wait a minute. You also don't pay on the principal for four years? You're kidding me, right? Who didn't see that as stupid besides the money changers who I believe Jesus threw out of the Temple and the government? Who didn't see that? You saw it and I saw it. What most people didn't see, because you're busy with your life, mainly trying to carve a little place out for yourself and for your family and you have to work harder than ever because of oh, I remember the Government! You're so busy, you don't have time to know what the LIBOR is? You know what the LIBOR is? Oh, jeez. Do you know what the M3 rating is for money supply? Please.

STU: Is the LIBOR the half lion, half tiger thing?

GLENN: Exactly, that's exactly right. Nobody has time to understand these things. And these clowns who are, you know, "Well, I'm wearing my tweed jacket right now. So I'm smarter than you." They're so trapped in their own bullcrap, they tried to tell you that these things, they didn't have to make common sense. "You don't understand the financial system. It's all set up in such a way that it can't possibly collapse. You don't know all the safeguards. There's too much money out there. There's too much money at stake. I mean, people know (laughing). You just don't understand." That's the way they treat you. And so you're busy, you don't look into the stuff that I can't tell you how many nights I've had two hours of sleep trying to learn what this crap means just to get to the end of it and go it's crap! And so most people just don't see it coming because you're busy and because the people in, oh, I don't know oh, I remember now the Government... are lying to you. And now we have our back up against the wall.

We are facing I don't care what the President said last night. "It could be a bad recession." Bad recession? I'll take a bad recession. We've had bad recessions before. We don't need a program that is twice the size of the prescription drug program for a bad recession. Bullcrap! You are trying to avoid the Great Depression. That's what you're trying to avoid. If you want to ask us for $700 billion which, of course, is the maximum that would ever... there's going to be a huge profit on $700 do you know how much money we're going to make? Excuse me? I've tried that with my wife. "Honey, do you know how much money we're going to make? We don't have to go to the movies. We just get a big screen TV. We just rent movies. Look at the price of tickets. Do you know how much money we're going to save?" I've even tried it this way. "Honey, they're on sale. They're normally, you know, $2,000. Now it's on sale. We can get it for $1299. Do you know how much money..." do you know what my wife says to me? "No, we're not saving money. We're spending $1200." Actually I would say $1200. I round down at 99. She looks at $1299 as $1300. She's a realist! I'm the politician in our relationship. A mere $700 billion. Okay, it's almost a trillion. Mark my words, it will be over $2 trillion. $700 billion ain't gonna do squat. It's not going to do squat. And now the politicians, as George Bush said last night, "Well, we can make a profit. We can make a profit." Really? Wow. You guys are so good at making good business decisions. You guys can I tell you something? I've seen all four of your books, all four of your books. They're all in the red! You guys are geniuses at making profits, yeah. Let's take it out of the private sector, give it right to you guys because you know what to do with money!

Don't talk to me about profits." We're gonna be able to make a profit." Really? Last night George Bush says we're going to be able to make profits. You know what the compromise is? Well, the compromise is that's right, the American people need to be helped out by this. So any profit that we get needs to go into a lockbox... where we can then take those profits and give them to the poor, to and I'm not kidding you help them finance their first home. You've got to be kidding me.

Is anybody else feeling like this? Is there anybody else? Anybody else thinking, "Hmmm, wait a minute, this isn't really good for me." Anybody else run a small business? Have you tried to get a loan? You can't get a loan. Why is that? Because everybody is hoarding it. They tell you not to hoard your money. "Oh, don't worry, don't worry, don't worry. The FDIC is there. You don't have to go get your money. Don't worry about it. Don't get your money. You don't need your money. Don't hoard your money. Don't do that." Do you know why they're doing that? Because they can't have you take out the money because the banks are hoarding the money. The banks. Go try to get a loan. Can't. Wait a minute, I'm going to go out of business if I can't get a loan. "Why can't I get a loan?" "Just not enough money right now." "Why isn't there enough money?" "Because we normally have $2 billion on hand just in case there's a run on the bank and right now we have... (mumbling)." "I'm sorry. What was that?" "We just, we only have... (mumbling)." "So wait a minute. There's lots of money in the vault then?" (Mumbling).

See, as we talked yesterday, I'm a guy who doesn't flirt with socialism. I don't want to flirt with socialism but unfortunately I see the bottom. I don't know why but on certain things I can see over the horizon and I think it's because most people aren't looking there. Jeez, you've got a responsibility, for the love of Pete. You're running the country! Mainly into the ground, but you're running the country! Can you guys not see over the horizon? Or are you just surrounded by so many people in tweed suits? You know what, there's two kinds of people. There are the kinds of people that go to college and they're just like, yeah, he's got a tweed suit. Do you see that tie? It's got like a, you know, Ivy League shield on it and stuff. It's like got a coat of arms there on his tie. He must be smart. I shouldn't question him when he says things that are nonsensical. There's two kinds of people. The people that go, "Oh, well, he's smarter than I am. So I should just shut up and take what he says." And then the other people that say, "Hang on a minute, that doesn't make sense." "Well, that's because you don't understand. I've got a degree." "I don't care about your degree. Explain this again until it makes sense." "Well, it's very complex." "Break it down." "No, just..." "Break it down. Go ahead." Have we forgot that Warren Buffett who, by the way, said that this is the Pearl Harbor of the economy. That was good. Have we forgotten what Warren Buffett said during the time in our nation's history where people were buying pets.com, when people were buying Enron, which is suspiciously like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac except much, much, much, much, much larger. When everybody was buying and what did he say? If you don't know what the company does, you shouldn't be buying it. If you can't explain it, then it's too good to be true.

Nobody can really understand, nobody can ever explain the economy and how all of these magic things can happen with the magic beans and all of a sudden then there's this big beanstalk and you've got beans for the rest of your life and you can climb up and there's a goose that lays golden eggs there in the castle and it's great. You just have to get away from the giant, but now we've got that one all figured out.

From the moment the 33-year-old Thomas Jefferson arrived at the Continental Congress in Philadelphia in 1776, he was on the radical side. That caused John Adams to like him immediately. Then the Congress stuck Jefferson and Adams together on the five-man committee to write a formal statement justifying a break with Great Britain, and their mutual admiration society began.

Jefferson thought Adams should write the Declaration. But Adams protested, saying, “It can't come from me because I'm obnoxious and disliked." Adams reasoned that Jefferson was not obnoxious or disliked, therefore he should write it. Plus, he flattered Jefferson, by telling him he was a great writer. It was a master class in passing the buck.

So, over the next 17 days, Jefferson holed up in his room, applying his lawyer skills to the ideas of the Enlightenment. He borrowed freely from existing documents like the Virginia Declaration of Rights. He later wrote that “he was not striving for originality of principle or sentiment." Instead, he hoped his words served as “an expression of the American mind."

It's safe to say he achieved his goal.

The five-man committee changed about 25 percent of Jefferson's first draft of the Declaration before submitting it to Congress. Then, Congress altered about one-fifth of that draft. But most of the final Declaration's words are Jefferson's, including the most famous passage — the Preamble — which Congress left intact. The result is nothing less than America's mission statement, the words that ultimately bind the nation together. And words that we desperately need to rediscover because of our boiling partisan rage.

The Declaration is brilliant in structure and purpose. It was designed for multiple audiences: the King of Great Britain, the colonists, and the world. And it was designed for multiple purposes: rallying the troops, gaining foreign allies, and announcing the creation of a new country.

The Declaration is structured in five sections: the Introduction, Preamble, the Body composed of two parts, and the Conclusion. It's basically the most genius breakup letter ever written.

In the Introduction, step 1 is the notificationI think we need to break up. And to be fair, I feel I owe you an explanation...

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another…

The Continental Congress felt they were entitled by “the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God" to “dissolve the political bands," but they needed to prove the legitimacy of their cause. They were defying the world's most powerful nation and needed to motivate foreign allies to join the effort. So, they set their struggle within the entire “Course of human events." They're saying, this is no petty political spat — this is a major event in world history.

Step 2 is declaring what you believe in, your standardsHere's what I'm looking for in a healthy relationship...

This is the most famous part of the Declaration; the part school children recite — the Preamble:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That's as much as many Americans know of the Declaration. But the Preamble is the DNA of our nation, and it really needs to be taken as a whole:

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

The Preamble takes us through a logical progression: All men are created equal; God gives all humans certain inherent rights that cannot be denied; these include the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; to protect those rights, we have governments set up; but when a government fails to protect our inherent rights, people have the right to change or replace it.

Government is only there to protect the rights of mankind. They don't have any power unless we give it to them. That was an extraordinarily radical concept then and we're drifting away from it now.

The Preamble is the justification for revolution. But note how they don't mention Great Britain yet. And again, note how they frame it within a universal context. These are fundamental principles, not just squabbling between neighbors. These are the principles that make the Declaration just as relevant today. It's not just a dusty parchment that applied in 1776.

Step 3 is laying out your caseHere's why things didn't work out between us. It's not me, it's you...

This is Part 1 of the Body of the Declaration. It's the section where Jefferson gets to flex his lawyer muscles by listing 27 grievances against the British crown. This is the specific proof of their right to rebellion:

He has obstructed the administration of justice...

For imposing taxes on us without our consent...

For suspending our own legislatures...

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us...

Again, Congress presented these “causes which impel them to separation" in universal terms to appeal to an international audience. It's like they were saying, by joining our fight you'll be joining mankind's overall fight against tyranny.

Step 4 is demonstrating the actions you took I really tried to make this relationship work, and here's how...

This is Part 2 of the Body. It explains how the colonists attempted to plead their case directly to the British people, only to have the door slammed in their face:

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury...

They too have been deaf to the voice of justice... We must, therefore... hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

This basically wrapped up America's argument for independence — we haven't been treated justly, we tried to talk to you about it, but since you refuse to listen and things are only getting worse, we're done here.

Step 5 is stating your intent — So, I think it's best if we go our separate ways. And my decision is final...

This is the powerful Conclusion. If people know any part of the Declaration besides the Preamble, this is it:

...that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved...

They left no room for doubt. The relationship was over, and America was going to reboot, on its own, with all the rights of an independent nation.

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

The message was clear — this was no pitchfork mob. These were serious men who had carefully thought through the issues before taking action. They were putting everything on the line for this cause.

The Declaration of Independence is a landmark in the history of democracy because it was the first formal statement of a people announcing their right to choose their own government. That seems so obvious to us now, but in 1776 it was radical and unprecedented.

In 1825, Jefferson wrote that the purpose of the Declaration was “not to find out new principles, or new arguments, never before thought of… but to place before mankind the common sense of the subject, in terms so plain and firm… to justify ourselves in the independent stand we are compelled to take."

You're not going to do better than the Declaration of Independence. Sure, it worked as a means of breaking away from Great Britain, but its genius is that its principles of equality, inherent rights, and self-government work for all time — as long as we actually know and pursue those principles.

On June 7, 1776, the Second Continental Congress met in Philadelphia at the Pennsylvania State House, better known today as Independence Hall. Virginia delegate Richard Henry Lee introduced a motion calling for the colonies' independence. The “Lee Resolution" was short and sweet:

Resolved, That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States, that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved.

Intense debate followed, and the Congress voted 7 to 5 (with New York abstaining) to postpone a vote on Lee's Resolution. They called a recess for three weeks. In the meantime, the delegates felt they needed to explain what they were doing in writing. So, before the recess, they appointed a five-man committee to come up with a formal statement justifying a break with Great Britain. They appointed two men from New England — Roger Sherman and John Adams; two from the middle colonies — Robert Livingston and Benjamin Franklin; and one Southerner — Thomas Jefferson. The responsibility for writing what would become the Declaration of Independence fell to Jefferson.

In the rotunda of the National Archives building in Washington, D.C., there are three original documents on permanent display: the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence. These are the three pillars of the United States, yet America barely seems to know them anymore. We need to get reacquainted — quickly.

In a letter to his friend John Adams in 1816, Jefferson wrote: “I like the dreams of the future, better than the history of the past."

America used to be a forward-looking nation of dreamers. We still are in spots, but the national attitude that we hear broadcast loudest across media is not looking toward the future with optimism and hope. In late 2017, a national poll found 59% of Americans think we are currently at the “lowest point in our nation's history that they can remember."

America spends far too much time looking to the past for blame and excuse. And let's be honest, even the Right is often more concerned with “owning the left" than helping point anyone toward the practical principles of the Declaration of Independence. America has clearly lost touch with who we are as a nation. We have a national identity crisis.

The Declaration of Independence is America's thesis statement, and without it America doesn't exist.

It is urgent that we get reacquainted with the Declaration of Independence because postmodernism would have us believe that we've evolved beyond the America of our founding documents, and thus they're irrelevant to the present and the future. But the Declaration of Independence is America's thesis statement, and without it America doesn't exist.

Today, much of the nation is so addicted to partisan indignation that "day-to-day" indignation isn't enough to feed the addiction. So, we're reaching into America's past to help us get our fix. In 2016, Democrats in the Louisiana state legislature tabled a bill that would have required fourth through sixth graders to recite the opening lines of the Declaration. They didn't table it because they thought it would be too difficult or too patriotic. They tabled it because the requirement would include the phrase “all men are created equal" and the progressives in the Louisiana legislature didn't want the children to have to recite a lie. Representative Barbara Norton said, “One thing that I do know is, all men are not created equal. When I think back in 1776, July the fourth, African Americans were slaves. And for you to bring a bill to request that our children will recite the Declaration, I think it's a little bit unfair to us. To ask our children to recite something that's not the truth. And for you to ask those children to repeat the Declaration stating that all men's are free. I think that's unfair."

Remarkable — an elected representative saying it wouldn't be fair for students to have to recite the Declaration because “all men are not created equal." Another Louisiana Democrat explained that the government born out of the Declaration “was used against races of people." I guess they missed that part in school where they might have learned that the same government later made slavery illegal and amended the Constitution to guarantee all men equal protection under the law. The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments were an admission of guilt by the nation regarding slavery, and an effort to right the wrongs.

Yet, the progressive logic goes something like this: many of the men who signed the Declaration of Independence, including Thomas Jefferson who wrote it, owned slaves; slavery is evil; therefore, the Declaration of Independence is not valid because it was created by evil slave owners.

It's a sad reality that the left has a very hard time appreciating the universal merits of the Declaration of Independence because they're so hung up on the long-dead issue of slavery. And just to be clear — because people love to take things out of context — of course slavery was horrible. Yes, it is a total stain on our history. But defending the Declaration of Independence is not an effort to excuse any aspect of slavery.

Okay then, people might say, how could the Founders approve the phrase “All men are created equal," when many of them owned slaves? How did they miss that?

They didn't miss it. In fact, Thomas Jefferson included an anti-slavery passage in his first draft of the Declaration. The paragraph blasted King George for condoning slavery and preventing the American Colonies from passing legislation to ban slavery:

He has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights to life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating and carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere... Determined to keep open a market where men should be bought and sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce.

We don't say “execrable" that much anymore. It means, utterly detestable, abominable, abhorrent — basically very bad.

Jefferson was upset when Georgia and North Carolina threw up the biggest resistance to that paragraph. Ultimately, those two states twisted Congress' arm to delete the paragraph.

Still, how could a man calling the slave trade “execrable" be a slaveowner himself? No doubt about it, Jefferson was a flawed human being. He even had slaves from his estate in Virginia attending him while he was in Philadelphia, in the very apartment where he was writing the Declaration.

Many of the Southern Founders deeply believed in the principles of the Declaration yet couldn't bring themselves to upend the basis of their livelihood. By 1806, Virginia law made it more difficult for slave owners to free their slaves, especially if the owner had significant debts as Jefferson did.

At the same time, the Founders were not idiots. They understood the ramifications of signing on to the principles described so eloquently in the Declaration. They understood that logically, slavery would eventually have to be abolished in America because it was unjust, and the words they were committing to paper said as much. Remember, John Adams was on the committee of five that worked on the Declaration and he later said that the Revolution would never be complete until the slaves were free.

Also, the same generation that signed the Declaration started the process of abolition by banning the importation of slaves in 1807. Jefferson was President at the time and he urged Congress to pass the law.

America has an obvious road map that, as a nation, we're not consulting often enough.

The Declaration took a major step toward crippling the institution of slavery. It made the argument for the first time about the fundamental rights of all humans which completely undermined slavery. Planting the seeds to end slavery is not nearly commendable enough for leftist critics, but you can't discount the fact that the seeds were planted. It's like they started an expiration clock for slavery by approving the Declaration. Everything that happened almost a century later to end slavery, and then a century after that with the Civil Rights movement, flowed from the principles voiced in the Declaration.

Ironically for a movement that calls itself progressive, it is obsessed with retrying and judging the past over and over. Progressives consider this a better use of time than actually putting past abuses in the rearview and striving not to be defined by ancestral failures.

It can be very constructive to look to the past, but not when it's used to flog each other in the present. Examining history is useful in providing a road map for the future. And America has an obvious road map that, as a nation, we're not consulting often enough. But it's right there, the original, under glass. The ink is fading, but the words won't die — as long as we continue to discuss them.

'Good Morning Texas' gives exclusive preview of Mercury One museum

Screen shot from Good Morning Texas

Mercury One is holding a special exhibition over the 4th of July weekend, using hundreds of artifacts, documents and augmented reality experiences to showcase the history of slavery — including slavery today — and a path forward. Good Morning Texas reporter Paige McCoy Smith went through the exhibit for an exclusive preview with Mercury One's chief operating officer Michael Little on Tuesday.

Watch the video below to see the full preview.

Click here to purchase tickets to the museum (running from July 4 - 7).

Over the weekend, journalist Andy Ngo and several other apparent right-leaning people were brutally beaten by masked-gangs of Antifa protesters in Portland, Oregon. Short for "antifascist," Antifa claims to be fighting for social justice and tolerance — by forcibly and violently silencing anyone with opposing opinions. Ngo, who was kicked, punched, and sprayed with an unknown substance, is currently still in the hospital with a "brain bleed" as a result of the savage attack. Watch the video to get the details from Glenn.