Glenn's Debate Notes

Glenn thought Sarah Palin was brilliant last night, but also thought that Biden did what he had to do. There were no big gaffes or knockout punches, but there were some statements that were a stretch or even flat out false. Find out how Glenn saw the debate last night with his notes and running commentary.

  • I loved the “Can I call you Joe?” that came from an open mic from Palin.


     

  • The open of understanding the economy by talking to parents at a soccer game initially made me nervous she might go over-hokey, but that was actually a really good relatable answer.


     

  • The CNN scorecard thing is amazing to watch, it would be interesting to have a web feature to do your own while watching.


     

  • Palin pulls out “predator lenders” again. Meters flat. Then she says: Don’t live outside out means. “Personal responsibility.” Meters go through the roof. Why republicans don’t think this is a winning message is perplexing. Palin shows the guts to go there—does it with tact---and scores one of the best debate moments for either candidate.


     

  • Given several opportunities, Palin seems like she simply will not praise deregulation. I guess they’re thinking it’s a hard case to make at this moment, but it strikes me as another winning argument that they won’t exploit. Something like “I know a little something about being a small business owner—so I’m not going to stand here and say I want the government to be more involved in my life. The answer isn’t “regulation, regulation, regulation—more, more, more” like the democrats are always offering-- it’s smart targeted regulation—like what John McCain called for two years ago for Fannie and Freddie.”


     

  • First 15 minutes Sarah very, very, solid. (One of my friends said she looks a bit nervous at this point. I didn’t notice.)


     

  • Joe seems to like her---I think that’s positive. They both seem to like each other. This is a major part of what Biden had to do in this debate. Turn down the jerk-o-meter as much as possible. He’s reasonably successful.


     

  • Palin compliments ‘massive oversight.’ I am taking these sort of comments as “I’m John McCain’s VP, and I don’t want to look pro-Wall St. executives in the middle of this mess.” I have to admit though, if she sounded like this and she was running for the top of the ticket with no restrictions, I’d be a little nervous.


     

  • The meters hate when you avoid the question, but they get over it pretty fast.


     

  • Did Joe Biden just “promise” exactly where next attack will come from and be planned?? Really? And he says with a straight face that he knows where Bin Laden is? Isn’t it about time that nonsense gets challenged? We don’t “know” that. We suspect it. And a terrorist plan is almost as likely to come from a coffee house in Los Angeles as it can come from the mountains of Pakistan. That’s either a fundamental misunderstanding of the war on terror, or trying to look tough for stupid people.


     

  • About meeting with Iran without preconditions, Biden just lies. Obama was specifically asked about presidential level meetings with Ahmendenejad without preconditions. Palin is right to call him out. I kind of wanted her to add “This is a government that wants to wipe Israel off the planet. This is a government that executes gays for being gay. This is a government that wouldn’t let me leave my house without a male escort if I lived in his country. What do you expect to chat with them about?”


     

  • Biden loves to say “let me say that again”----very repetitive. I’m sure those liberals all over Palin for sticking to talking points too much will gladly point this out. His point about Exxon getting a $4 billion tax cut is embarrassing. As we’ve said before—his lone reasoning for this is that McCain wants to cut taxes for all businesses, and that Exxon is a business. You can just as easily say he wants to cut taxes curing childhood diseases. It’s literally looking over a list of all companies and picking out the one that you don’t like the most. I’d love for someone to call him out on that.


     

  • So far, so good for Palin. She’s been great so far, and she’s probably far enough in to this thing that people watching just to see if she’s going to be Tina Fey’s characture of her have already stopped watching due to utter disappointment. You can’t honestly make the point to me that she is an idiot. She obviously has a handle on these issues.


     

  • Speaking as a radio guy—we have a term called a “crutch”. Which is that thing in your speech pattern that you probably say too much. Think McCain “my friends” or Arnolds “and all of these other things”. Palin’s has to be “also.”


     

  • Interesting approach here by Palin. She is just standing there, toe to toe, running with Joe Biden at “his game” (not the gaffe prone, not telling the truth part of his game. The internal politics, well of the senate, debating policy sort of game.) After my initial worries about being overly hokey, I actually wouldn’t have minded seeing a tad more of “her game.” But that’s a nit-pick. We’re an hour in, and she’s been very impressive. SNL, Hollywood, and the media might win in painting her as unqualified—but in her two most watched appearances she’s been brilliant.


     

  • When describing a Biden administration, he says it would be a national tragedy of historic levels. Okay, yes I know what he was doing, but it was funny anyway.


     

  • Sarah didn’t seem to hear the question on her Achilles heel, and just answers in a sort of “what we would do while in office” sort of way. But Biden DID hear the question, and his answer is laughably horrible. I mean, it’s kind of a pointless question, but come on Joe. Your Achilles heel is “excessive passion”? That’s a “high school kid on a job interview” answer—not a “VP answer with a 2 minutes to prepare” answer.


     

  • Palin’s stop looking into the past, lets look to the future—argument is the best way to handle the popularity problems of Bush that I’ve seen all campaign. A lot of people will talk about her “Say it ain’t so Joe” line—but her point of ‘why do you always insist on looking backwards’ works really well—especially when delivered by her, standing next to him. Probably doesn’t work quite as well for McCain, but I haven’t heard a better option.


     

  • I find myself feeling a little bad for President Bush. He is really treated like poison, and I get the strategy. But, the democrats are insanely unfair to him, and republicans are afraid to compliment even the obviously good things he’s done. Imagine if I told you in 2001—NO MORE ATTACKS by 2008, and the president wouldn’t get a word of credit from either party for it. There’s no way you would believe me.


     

  • Joe Biden chokes up…it was a nice moment for him I thought. I didn’t hear her suggest “only women can understand being a single parent” though. Maybe I missed it.


     

  • For all the book talk about Gwen Ifill---she was fine tonight, I thought. And actually pretty good. I’ve heard some people complaining that Biden was always given the last word. That might be true—but I didn’t really notice it. She didn’t really go into the “come up with a list of 3rd basemen in the minor leagues in 1933” type of questions to try and make Palin squirm.


     

  • Biden did exactly what he had to do in this thing. Looked like a pro and confident in his answers, even when he was completely lying. If Palin was up against Tim Kaine or someone similar this could have been really bad for democrats. Instead it was fine for them. He did no real harm, although he will get hammered in some of the post debate fact checks.


     

  • But the big story is---this was great for Palin—and good for McCain. McCain shows he didn’t make a ridiculously reckless pick, even though his poll number drop has much more to do with the economy than it does Palin even at her worst moments. But for me—this was a huge night for the future. Unless she has a major gaffe later on, you can’t say that Palin was responsible for McCain losing, if he loses. And you likely can give her some credit if he wins. She did a great job setting herself up for a bright future—and perhaps a presidential run in 2012 or 16. Palin/Jindal ’12? Anyone??


     

  • Katie Couric’s CBS has a poll saying Biden won pretty handily, although it’s much less pronounced in the other polls I’ve seen. The CNN one has it at 51-36 or 51-39 depending on what graphic they were showing at the time. Remember—republicans ALWAYS lose post-debate polls. And they are up against a lot of momentum at the moment.


     

  • Obviously when you factor in ideas, I thought Palin won by a lot in my mind. But even just as pure performance, I thought it was a good debate—with Palin having the edge. I’m not sure if that has too much to do with the pre-debate expectations, or the fact that Biden said a lot of things that don’t jive with reality. But, either way—even a tie for Palin is a far more than she had to do.


     

  • Deeper in the polls, some great signs for Palin:

    • Did they do better or worse than you expected? Palin: 84-7 better than worse. She thrives when underestimated.

    • Who’s more of a “typical politician” ---Biden 70-21. –if this country is as annoyed with Washington as they seem—this certainly can’t hurt.

If we learned nothing from the media over the past 4 years it's that colluding with a foreign entity to either win an election or for personal gain is absolutely grotesque. Well, that depends on whether you have a (D) or (R) before your name anyway. President Trump was impeached on rumor and innuendo yet Joe Biden has all but skated on his corruption up to this point.

Below is a timeline that shows the level of corruption and the lengths the Biden's went to in order to build that family's wealth and influence internationally.

2009

In 2009, Joe Biden was the brand-new Vice President and John Kerry was a U.S. Senator. Just five months after Joe was sworn in, his son Hunter, and Kerry's stepson, Christopher Heinz, formed an international private equity firm called Rosemont Capital. It had several different branches, including one called Rosemont Seneca Partners.

2010

Just nine months after Rosemont Seneca opened its doors, Hunter Biden went to China for meetings with executives from China's biggest banks, and its sovereign wealth and social security funds. That's unheard-of access for a brand-new firm. Was it just coincidence that at the same time Hunter was meeting these Chinese bigwigs, his dad was meeting with China's then-president Hu Jintao in Washington DC at a nuclear security summit?

2011

In May 2011, Joe Biden met with Chinese officials for the U.S.-China Strategic & Economic Dialogue conference in Washington. Just two weeks later, Hunter Biden went to Taiwan for meetings with the same Chinese financial giants he'd met in China in 2010, plus some new ones.

2013

By December 2013, Joe Biden was enjoying his second term as VP, and John Kerry was now Secretary of State. That's when Joe traveled to Beijing on an extended official trip and Hunter traveled with him on Air Force Two.

During their stay, Vice President Biden met with President Xi and Hunter was mostly out of sight. We don't know exactly what he was up to, but the deal finalized between Rosemont Seneca and the Bank of China just ten days after the Bidens' trip pretty much gives it away. The most powerful financial institution in China formed a joint venture with tiny Rosemont Seneca to create a giant new investment firm called Bohai Harvest RST – the "RS" stands for Rosemont Seneca.

The firm is often called "BHR" for short.

Hunter Biden was a member of the Board. Remember, the Bank of China is government-owned, which means its business is completely intertwined with the goals of the Chinese Communist Party. BHR also got the freedom to operate in the newly created Shanghai Free-Trade Zone where, over the next six years, it would use $2.5 billion of Chinese government money to invest in China, as well as in other countries, including the U.S.

During their Beijing trip, Hunter also introduced Jonathan Li to his dad. Li is Hunter's business partner – he's CEO and Director of BHR.

Hunter arranged for Joe to meet Li in the lobby of the hotel where they stayed during their Beijing trip.

2014

In 2014, one of BHR's first major investments was in the China General Nuclear Power Corporation.

CGN is a Chinese government-owned nuclear power company that sold off a stake of the company to outside investors. Problem is, CGN was under FBI investigation for paying informants in the U.S. to steal nuclear secrets.

In 2016, the FBI arrested the ringleader of this nuclear espionage, a man named Allen Ho.

When they arrested Ho, he was using a random code generator to access funds being provided to him from – where else? – the Bank of China.

Yet while this FBI probe was going on, the son of the Vice President owned a stake in the company being investigated. And even after arrests were made, Rosemont Seneca did not alter its relationship with BHR, nor did it divest from CGN, even though it was stealing U.S. nuclear secrets.

2015

In 2015, BHR partnered with the Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) to buy an American company called Henniges for $600 million.

AVIC is a gigantic military contractor in China – think Lockheed Martin – that makes fighter jets, bombers and drones. BHR bought 49% of Henniges and AVIC bought 51%.

Henniges is a precision parts manufacturer specializing in anti-vibration technology. The stuff they make is known as "dual use" by the U.S. State Department, which means the technology can also have a military application.

Because of that, the deal had to be approved by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS) since it could have national security implications. The thing is, the American side of BHR – meaning Hunter Biden and his pals – had to know there were serious national security implications with AVIC.

The year before they formed a partnership with AVIC, the Wall Street Journal reported how AVIC stole technology related to the U.S. Air Force's F-35 stealth fighter and used it in its own stealth fighter for the Chinese.

How the Committee on Foreign Investment approved that deal remains a mystery. CFIUS does not publicly disclose any information regarding its decisions. Their findings are not publicly announced.

Interesting that China accounted for the largest share – with 74 transactions – approved by CFIUS during Obama's second term (2013-2015).

Under the umbrella of Rosemont Capital was a real estate company called Rosemont Realty. In 2015, a Chinese company called Gemini Investments bought a 75% stake in Rosemont Realty. The company was renamed Gemini Rosemont

Gemini brought $3 billion to the partnership with Rosemont, with the aim of buying "Class A institutional-quality commercial office properties in U.S. markets."

Red flag (literally) – Gemini Investments is a subsidiary of the China Ocean Shipping Company, a.k.a., "COSCO."

COSCO is a Chinese government-owned company. Its headquarters in Beijing is actually next to the headquarters of the Bank of China. COSCO is well-known for its close military ties. It's essentially a branch of the Chinese Navy.

2017

In 2017, BHR invested in Face++. That's the facial recognition phone app built by a Chinese company that is incorporated in a separate app built by the Chinese government. Police in the Xinjiang [Sin-jong] region of China use that app to keep tabs on citizens, and track and detain Uiguhr [Wee-ger] Muslims.

The app allows police easy access to data about Chinese Muslims including things like religious activity, blood type, and even the amount of electricity they use.

2018

In March 2018, a spokesman (Chris Bastardi) for Christopher Heinz (John Kerry's stepson) emailed The Hill to say that Heinz had "no operating role" in Rosemont Seneca, and that he was not involved in any of Rosemont's deals in China (which contradicts Schweizer's report in his book Secret Empires).

Chris Heinz was involved in Rosemont Capital. Rosemont Seneca was established under the same GP as Rosemont Capital, but Chris Heinz had no operating role in it. Chris and his family have no financial interest or investment in Bohai Harvest RST, he has never traveled to China, and he has never met with the firm's Chinese management team or investors.

2019

In October 2019, Hunter Biden's lawyer, George Mesires, said Hunter did not conduct any business on that 2013 trip to Beijing with his Dad.

Mesires said the timing of BHR's business license getting approved was purely coincidental because the paperwork had been submitted months before the Bidens' China trip.

According to Hunter's lawyer, the approval " was not related in any way, shape or form to Hunter's visit."

Hunter Biden finally stepped down from the BHR board last October (2019), but he DID NOT give up his 10% stake in the company.

When Bevan Cooney — the former "junior" business partner to Hunter Biden and Devon Archer — went to jail in 2019, investigative reporter and New York Times bestselling author Peter Schweizer thought he'd never gain access to the damning emails Cooney had promised. That all changed three weeks ago when Schweizer was given complete access to Cooney's gmail account.

Schweizer joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Tuesday to describe just some of the business deals revealed within these emails — like Hunter working with an alleged Russian criminal and with Chinese communists to secure their assets, or to secure one-on-one time with his dad, then-Vice President Joe Biden. And all of this new information is completely separate from the emails allegedly discovered on Hunter Biden's laptop recently reported by the New York Post.

"So, I want to make this clear. This [Cooney's emails] has nothing to do with what's on the laptop … It didn't come from [Rudy] Giuliani. It didn't come from anybody else, right?" Glenn asked Schweizer.

"That's absolutely correct," Schweizer confirmed.

He briefly explained how Cooney, a former Los Angeles nightclub owner, is currently serving a prison sentence for his involvement in a fraudulent business bond scheme with Biden and Archer. From prison, Cooney gave Schweizer written permission to access his Gmail account.

"This is really important," he noted. "We're not looking at printouts. Not looking at PDFs. We're actually in his Gmail accounts themselves, sifting through these emails. And there's a shocking amount of information about deals involving China, involving Russia, involving all sorts of things they were trying to pull off."

Watch the video below to catch more of the conversation:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The king of "No Spin" and bestselling author of "Killing Crazy Horse," Bill O'Reilly joined Glenn Beck on this week's podcast to talk about the latest developments in Joe Biden's Ukraine and China corruption scandal. Now that some of the details are finally coming out in the open, does the average Democrat care? Maybe, but the Left doesn't seem to.

O'Reilly argued there's more hatred for President Donald Trump now than in 2016, and that some people hate President Trump so much that they'd rather vote for the "senile, corrupt" Joe Biden.

"Hunter got tens of millions of dollars from Ukraine, from Russia, from China because his father was vice president. I have no doubt in my mind," O'Reilly said. "But the hatred for Donald Trump overrides that in the minds of millions of viewers. They're saying, 'You know, we'd rather have the senile corrupt guy than Trump.'"

Asked by Glenn if any other Republican running for president would be met with the same level of vitriol, O'Reilly answered, "The Left is the Left. They don't like America. The want to redo the Constitution. They want to take some of our freedoms, like the Second Amendment and the First Amendment, and change them. And they want to destroy capitalism and replace it with a big centralized government in Washington that controls the economy … but I'm talking about the folks. I have liberal friends and I say to them, 'Do you not understand that when you vote for Biden, you're voting against your own self interest?'"

Watch the video clip from the full podcast below, or find the full episode HERE:

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

In a phone call with his constituents, Senator Ben Sasse (R-Neb) unleashed a torrent of criticisms about President Donald Trump, saying he "flirted with white supremacists," "kisses dictators' butts," and "spends like a drunken sailor."

On the radio program Friday, Glenn said he was disappointed in Sen. Sasse for apparently forgetting all of President Trump's accomplishments. Because, in reality, Trump has accomplished a lot more than many presidents before him.

Then, for anyone who may have forgotten President Trump's achievements — or who simply hate the man so much they've ignored them — Glenn listed just some of the many things this president has achieved during his three and a half years in the White House.

Watch the video below to hear Glenn's message for all the Trump-haters who have forgotten Trump's accomplishments, or you can read Glenn's list HERE:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.