Glenn Beck: Octuplet mom under fire


GLENN: But I want to talk to you about a couple of other things that are on my desk and if I don't get to them today, I won't get back to them. The woman who's having the octuplets, did anybody see the TV show on last night, Robert George on, professor from Princeton University, and we were talking about this. You know, everybody is like, "You know, I want to put this..." let me give you this story. Here is this woman who is having octuplets, find out that she's had six other children, giving you two more children than you need to field an entire basketball franchise. Brainteaser for both conservatives and liberals. From a conservative perspective, you know, children are God's gift, you know, this is what we're here for, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, but you're crazy if you have 14 kids! I don't say that as a conservative. I say that as a dad who says you're crazy if you've got 14 children! Four is enough. Four may be too much. Four, it's like if you have more than two cats, you're crazy. Think if you have more than one kid, you may be -- I'm just saying, personal experience. But you want to have 14 kids? God bless you. It's up to you. You can have 14 kids. If you look at the quotes from the doctors, conservatives should love this story even more. "Our patient was counseled regarding her options for the pregnancy. The options were to continue the pregnancy or selectively abort. Patient chose to continue the pregnancy." Does the term "Selectively abort" make you all warm and cuddly inside? I love that. The fact that she chose to keep the kids is a nice touch in today's world. However, on the other side she went to the turkey baster people and she had eight put into her, eight that are now going to be on the public dole.

Look, I have no problem with Angelina Jolie having 135 kids. Hey, they got a big enough house. Have you seen the house? They got a huge house, they got plenty of money. Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. And the good thing is all the kids, male and female, can look at their parents and go, "Not really my parents." Man, they are hot. But when you're getting some of my money, perhaps intentionally popping out another eight kids not really the best idea. I got my own kids I'm trying to pay for.

On the other side if you're a liberal, you've got to love the fact that the mom of 14 is a single mom. Shows all the evil conservatives you don't need a dad, she can do it herself. However, on the other side she's dreamt her whole life about being a mom. Conservatives feel, "Oh, look at that, here's a woman who wants to be a mom." On the other side, "She wanted to be a mom? She's proving that she can do it without a man but she dreamt about being a mom? Doesn't she realize she could be so much more than just a mom?" But at the same time, 14 children! What the heck is wrong with you! But on the other side, "14 kids, that's really what it's all about." But on the other side, "Do you know what a drain on the environment that is?" Environmentalists now are saying, I kid you not, that we should have a two-child limit like China's one-child limit. I actually know this woman. She's from China. She's over here on a work visa and she can't wait to go back home. And I said, "What is it that you're looking forward to going back to China? I mean, doesn't that whole Chinese thing kind of spook you?" And she looked at me. And I said, oh, yeah, that doesn't sound right. You know, the government, the communist thing? She said, oh, you know what? They have their problems, but everybody has their problems. I mean, every country has their own quirks. I said, how about the one-child-only policy? She said, I know, that one's tough. My sister had a second baby. They hid it for about six months. They finally came, took the baby and -- what did she call it? Something like took care of it. She said, "My sister and my brother really haven't gotten over that." And I said, "Took care of it? Is that kind of a euphemism for we're going to drown it in a rice paddy?" "Well, you know, every government has..." are you kidding me? Now environmentalists are saying this woman is using seven times the resources as the maximum that, you know, these tree huggers will accept from the evil breeders. And by the way, I'm using thei r language. That's what you're known as. That's what she's known as, a breeder. It's the attack of the octuplets.

So here's my solution. You drop all the children off at Angelina's doorstep with a note that says, "They're from a completely unheard of African country that only has white orphans. They just fall out of the sky, and they're all biodegradable." They all get adopted, problem solved, we move on with our life.

You know, I asked Professor George who is one of the big conservative thinkers last night, Robert George, this guy is amazing. He just got a medal from the president. I don't know, Superman of the Earth or whatever it is. And he is probably the leading authority on the right to life and everything else. And I said you wouldn't have gotten -- this woman wouldn't have been able to adopt kids, one, let alone eight. I said, how can she -- I mean, where is the responsibility of the turkey baster people? He said, "Well, that's the biggest problem. None of it's regulated. There are no rules on turkey basting." I mean, you know, whatever, got a turkey baster, will do, we're opening up shop. There's no thought at all. I believe you have to go and get a psych evaluation if you want to have plastic surgery. No, Stu, I think you do. If you want to have serious plastic surgery, I think you're required to have some sort of a psych thing.

STU: Right, but you're saying --

GLENN: I don't know how the cat lady got past it.

STU: You are saying that the problem, you are saying we shouldn't have the PATRIOT Act because we don't want to give the government any power. In our you are complaining about birthing children because there's no regulation?

GLENN: No, no, no.

STU: It's like you're saying parenting license.

GLENN: No, no, this is a problem. I'm saying, look, you want to look like the cat lady, look like the cat lady. You want somebody to cut you up, great. I wish there were more doctors that say, I'm not going to make you look like a cat, I'm just sayin'. Be, hey, you want to look like a cat, whiskers and all, go ahead. I'm sure you'll find some dope that will do it for you. Just don't come complaining to me when you're like, "I don't have the money to take the whiskers out now." Sucks to be you, doesn't it, cat lady? (Singing meow, meow). "I'm the President of the United States. Next." "Yes, I'm the cat lady and I had whiskers put in." That's all I say to you, (singing meow, meow) -- you're not listening to me anymore, (singing meow). That's what I do.

STU: Thank you. I think what you're asking for is for people to be responsible and --

GLENN: Be responsible. You are being responsible. I'm asking you, you can get an adoption. You don't think that maybe -- I mean, if you're for the adoption thing and all the regulation on adoption, you don't think that maybe that should just blend into the whole "We're just making up a batch of boys and girls now and pouring them right into your belly."

STU: But I mean, you are not going to regulate sex. Anyone can go out and have as many kids as they want by the old-fashioned way.

GLENN: That is -- the old-fashioned way is the old-fashioned way.

STU: Well, I know it is.

GLENN: This is somebody coming in, "Mix me up a bunch of boys and girls, will you?" I mean, I think I have a problem with that.

STU: I understand --

GLENN: Only because I'm paying for it. You're paying for it. The children are paying for it.

STU: But you can have -- again how do you regulate that?

GLENN: Because you are asking for a procedure. You are creating life. This isn't, "Put whiskers in my cheeks." This is, "Give me a batch of boys and girls. I'll take three girls and four boys."

STU: That's what sex is.

GLENN: No, it's not.

STU: Yes, it is.

GLENN: No, it's not.

STU: It creates life. You have to --

GLENN: Whoa. Whoa, whoa. Holy cow, my wife has been tricking me. That's how that works?

STU: Yeah, it's crazy.

GLENN: No, it's different. This is a natural thing. This is, "I want eight of them put into me. I want that one and that one and that one and that one and then you just pick, surprise me. Put them in me."

STU: But you wouldn't limit someone who wanted to have sex every nine months and reproduce another kid.

GLENN: I would be the same way on adoption, the same way with adoption. Look, if it's Angelina Jolie, you can have 135 kids. You seem to be -- even though I may not agree with you on everything, you seem to be a reasonable person. The whole, is his name serial killer spooky actor guy?

STU: She's moved on from Billy Bob Thornton.

GLENN: However, I think we have to have a talk. Whole blood in the vial around my neck thing. You seem to be a reasonable person, you got the money, you can take care of the kids, I don't -- it's not me to say how you're going to raise them. But if you want to have 135 kids, you can have 135 kids. But you are somebody that can afford to have the 135 kids.

Now, if you are having them God's way and you're like, "Yep, she just shoots them out at night," that's fine. I have no place. But if you're asking for a business to create a life for you, I think we do have regulation. I don't know. The ram man, half ram, half man, I think we could have a little regulation there.

STU: Well, what about the fertilization drugs? Or any procedure that might increase your chance of having twins?

GLENN: Stu, I'm not this smart.

STU: (Laughing).

GLENN: Stop. This is why people don't think these things. This is why nobody goes down this road because it's like, I don't know!

STU: This is why you drop the kids off at Angelina's house.

GLENN: Exactly right!

STU: And move on with your life.

GLENN: Did you hear my solution?

STU: I understand it now.

GLENN: This is how it's solved. We don't have to have these conversations if everyone was just responsible. If everybody stopped thinking of their children, "Well, that's what I've always wanted. I've always wanted a whole bunch of kids." How about we think about what the kids would get with you as a mom and dad, or a mom and no dad, and a mom with no dad and two parents that just went, "She's crazy as bats. We had to get away from her. She's destroying the family." I think maybe people just need to take a moment and stop -- again I go back to Captain Sully. He called his library and said, "You know that book I just checked out? Professional Life Ethics? I just checked that out and it's in the belly of the plane and I'm not going to be able to return it." He did it with no one watching. Why? Because he had responsibility. He had made a promise to someone. When you're creating life, no matter if you do it in a test tube, a paint bucket, you know, the old-fashioned way, the stork, you are making a contract. You are promising, whether you like it or not, it may just like, "She was hot." Sorry. That pen's ink ain't invisible. It lasts forever. You're signing a contract in there and you're saying, "I'm making life. So now I'm in charge of that life. I am responsible for that life. I'm responsible for caring for it, paying for it, raising it, trying to help shape that child into a better human than I was, trying to move the ball of humanity down the field a little bit." When you're just higgledy-piggledy, "I just want a cute little baby," I don't think so.

STU: I don't know. I can understand the government regulating the end of life. That is something that is clearly at some level everyone would agree that that's in their powers. When you're talking about the government regulating the creation of it...

GLENN: We're talking about commerce.

STU: Yeah, but --

GLENN: We're talking about commerce.

STU: Just because deposit --

GLENN: We regulate energy. We can't regulate embryos?

STU: We do regulate energy but the question of it being the correct thing to do in most cases is something I would argue to the death.

GLENN: Here again is the solution. People need to be responsible.

STU: But they're not responsible.

GLENN: Okay then. Then we need to decide, are we going to be a society that says, "Oh, well, they weren't responsible; so we've got to go help them out. Let's go help them out." Or, do we say everyone is responsible for their own choices? Sorry, nobody's too big to fail, and step over the drug addict.

STU: Right. If you -- here's where I come in. This is my policy, I think. When this woman comes into the "I want to pop out eight new babies" center and she says I want to pop out eight new babies, she gets a note and that note says, "We will never give you a dime for any of these new babies."

GLENN: Yeah, when she first walks in before the turkey baster.

STU: And then she signs it and we may take her kids away from her.

GLENN: If somebody walks in and says, I want to have 14 kids, you don't have a job, she hasn't had a job in her case since 2002. "You haven't had a job since 2002, you already have six kids." "I want to have eight more babies." "Okay, tell me a little bit about yourself." "Well, I have a farm and the kids, we all, we have animals and we raise our own eggs and we have our chickens and we live like they used to live a long time ago." "Okay. I got no problem." But if you're like, "Yeah, well, I live in an apartment in the middle of the city. I'm on government assistance and, well, I really haven't worked. Although I was qualified, I just couldn't find something I really liked." No kids for you.

STU: Because the company certainly has the choice to not provide the service.

GLENN: Exactly right.

STU: But you know some company is going to provide it at some point.

GLENN: That's fine. But I don't have to be responsible for what some company and some idiot does. And the best way to solve it is for all of us to reconnect with our values, to know what's important. And it's not about you. And to be ethical, is there nobody in this company who's like, "I don't think we should put that turkey baster in here. I'm just sayin'."

Many members of the far-left already are calling for a ‘Night of Rage’ after the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, and the White House has been discussing plans to defy the ruling too. In fact, one idea floated by Biden Administration officials, according to the New York Times, includes providing abortions on military bases. So, will America experience another summer of riots? Are YOUR taxpayer dollars at risk? And what does this mean for deep-blue states? Josh Hammer, legal expert and opinion editor for Newsweek, joins Glenn to discuss what may come next...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Josh Hammer, he's the opinion editor of Newsweek. He's the host of the Josh Hammer show. He is really quite brilliant. One of the leading minds in the conservative movement, I think. Josh Hammer joins us now.

To tell us, what did you find in this decision?

JOSH: Glenn, great to be back with you, on such a momentous, and really such an emotional day, honestly. So, you know, look, as you said, this dropped recently. Funny enough, I was in the middle of getting a guest lecture from an organization on the advisory board as to when it drops. So I barely had any time to kind of skim through, let alone guess the concerning dissenting opinions. But it looks like this looks very similar, to the draft opinion that was leaked, by the Politico story, a month and a half ago, in early May. And I think those of us who were praying that the five justices from this leaked draft opinion, would have the fortitude to stiffen their spines against this unprecedented assault. Now knows that our prayers were answered, Glenn. That's really my takeaway right now.

This looks a lot like the leaked opinion. Justice Thomas and Justice Kavanaugh have some reconcurring opinions.

But unbelievable. And really just holding aside the constitutional law stuff for a second hear. Just speaking as pro-lifers, on a day like today, I think we really just need to pause. And I tweeted this out earlier. We need to just be grateful for our half century of pro-life activist forbearers. You know, this -- Glenn, this issue could have gone away after 1973. That was a long time ago. 1973. I mean, this issue could have just gone away. We owe a tremendous debt of gratitude to the pro-life moral activist. Political activist. And, of course, yes. Legal activist. Who fought day in and day out, that makes sure this great injustice stayed front and center of our national, political conscience. And in many days, the culmination of a half century of fighting for truth and justice. But in many ways, it's also a new beginning for the pro-life fight as well, interestingly.

STU: How do you mean a new beginning for the fight? I just it's going to turn, I think we're going to see abortion turn even darker in those states that allow it. Is that -- is that what you're meaning by this?

JOSH: Well, look, for a half century now, Roe vs. Wade, and its project any, specifically, the Planned Parenthood versus Casey case of 1992.

They took away from the states obviously. They arrogated authority away from the states, the ability to attempt to nationally codify one view of the morality of abortion.

It happened to be a profoundly immoral view. So these -- the fight now shifts to the states. And the pro-life activists. And all the 50 states. Especially, obviously in red states. Purple states. I mean, admittedly some blue states like New York and California, probably won't be able to touch them there.

But we have to make sure that our side is well positioned in the state Capitols for every red, purplish, probably even light blue state, to make sure we fight for successful, cogent, and morally consistent pro-life legislation. The state of Oklahoma, actually, just north of Texas. Right where you are now, Glenn. They have been leading on this actually. Governor Kevin Stitt signed into law, a fantastic pro-life bill there in Oklahoma. A few weeks ago. Maybe a month ago or so at this point, that basically just bans abortion straightforward from conception. And there are some -- you know, obviously, likable the mother. So forth. But we really need to start thinking about trying to craft legislation now, at the state level. But to your point, I do fear that the blue states will only double down in their radicalism. Unfortunately within that will only lead to an ever greater divide, in our country, that we have today. But obviously, at the end of the day. We're going to save at the end of the day, millions and millions of unborn children. We are going to save human beings who can grow up to cure cancer, who can win Nobel prices.

I mean, this is just a tremendous win for the human species. I don't know how to say it other than that.

GLENN: I will tell you, I saw the stat, that I think it was last year or the year before. 20 percent of all pregnancies ended in abortion. 20 percent.

JOSH: Wow.

GLENN: That is -- that is a shocking number. And we do have our -- our work cut out for us. Because I -- I think that these states are going to double down. But I think, you know -- God doesn't waste anything. You know, there is no waste with God. Even the -- even the worst things that could possibly happen, turn out to be something good. You know what I mean? You're like, holy cow, how did that just happen.

And I think that evil is going to fully come unmasked. I'm telling you, Josh. I don't know how you feel about this. I think this could be the day of America's Kristallnacht. I can see these pro-life centers being burned to the ground today. They're calling for a night of rage around the country. I think evil is going to show itself. And that will scare the American people, hopefully.

JOSH: You know, I've been thinking about this a lot this week, actually. Because I've been bracing for a new kind of George Floyd summer of love, happening this summer. Coming to a city or suburb near you. Unfortunately, myself. Look, I live in Florida. I know, Glenn, you live in Texas. It is in moments like this, where I do think that where you live matters. And who your mayor is. Who your governor is, matters.

Because law and order and rioting and anarchy is not really a federal issue. It is to a limited extent. June 2020, Tom Cotton wrote this op-ed that was pretty controversial at the time.

I happen to agree with it. Where he said, quote, unquote, send in the troops. And there is some federal legislation from the reconstruction era that would justify that.

But most kind of quelling and quashing of anarchy does happen. Constitutionally speaking, at the state and local level. So at a moment like this, where I fear that you're probably not wrong. I take some solace. That Governor DeSantis is my governor. I think Texans should take some solace, that they are represented by -- by a Republican governor. The legislature there as well. So I -- I fear that you are right. I pray obviously, that no one -- it's hard.

I fear that it's something -- that something bad is happening. At the end of the day, of course. It does not mean that justices cannot do what they are supposed to do. So thank God they did that.

GLENN: So, Josh, have you looked into what the White House has been saying? The White House yesterday. In fact, do we have a clip of -- of this?

What the White House said yesterday, about the guns. And then they were turned to the -- the Scott us ruling, for Roe vs. Wade. Do we have that, please?

JOSH: Will the president accept this decision, even if he disagrees with it?

VOICE: I think it's going to come from the Supreme Court. So it's a decision we certainly are going to respond to. I'll leave it at that. Just like any other Supreme Court decision. Just like the one they did today on guns.

GLENN: So the White House won't say that they're going to accept it.

Which I don't think they will. They're talking now about taking doctors and moving them into places like Oklahoma or Texas, where abortions will be outlawed. And putting doctors on our military bases to perform abortions.

I mean, where does this go, when you have a government, that is in defiance of -- of one branch of the government?

JOSH: So there's a lot to unpack here. So we should start from first principles. The idea of judicial supremacy, and this is a peculiar thing, to say on a day like today, where such a pro-life victory has happened in Italy. But if we're going to be consistent here, the idea of judicial supremacy. The idea that the justices, have the sole and exclusive ability to interpret the Constitution for themselves. And no other Constitutional actor, in article one or article two, let alone the state. Has the ability to tentatively interpret it. That is erroneous. In fact, actually it was really Abraham Lincoln actually, who in the Dred Scott case, famously opposed judicial supremacy and flouted the Dred Scott ruling, at least as it pertains to everybody other than Dred Scott himself. I have actually argued, a former legal scholarship, in a law review article actually, that the Laconian view of how each branch of government should interpret the Constitution for itself, is correct.

Having said that. Having said that, there is a thing called prudence. And there is a thing called comedy. And in a moment like today, when it really does look like -- and I agree with you, that we are now bracing for riots through the streets. When the political rhetoric is at DEFCON one. When people are trying to assassinate Supreme Court justices. I think it would be -- at its bare minimum, a profoundly imprudent act. For the Biden administration, to try to undermine this ruling.

Now, what they might do, is they might try to kind of issue some kind of executive orders, or issue some regulations, that might try to kind of undermine it, at the edges here. But at the end of the day, the idea that this returns to the state. There's not really a whole lot they can do about that. Basically, at this point, throughout the country. Kentucky within West Virginia. Kansas. Whatever. If they want to go ahead and ban abortion, what can the Biden administration literally do about that? I mean, short of sending in the National Guard, to protect Planned Parenthood, if the state legislature of Kentucky goes ahead and bans it. There's not a whole lot they can do. And it's very difficult to envision a world, in which the Biden administration literally sends in troops to red states, to protect Planned Parenthood, if that state legislature goes ahead and bans it. So for practically speaking. This is a lot of tough talk and rhetoric. Obviously the campaign here in 2022. There's not really a whole lot that practically speaking, they can do to actually prevent red and purple states from enacting pro-life legislation.

GLENN: I'm glad to -- I'm glad to hear that. I know that they have been working on things. I mean, he has said, you know, there's executive orders, that I can employ. There are things that I can do. He's talked about a national public health emergency. Which I think is just -- is crazy. But I would hope, that the president would come out and say, we strongly disagree with this. And you're right. The court is not the end all. But the court did not end abortion. It just said, the people should decide. I think that's the best kind of court ruling, on any of it. The people should decide what this is. And send it back to the states. Josh, I thank you very much. Appreciate your time. Was there -- there was another ruling, that came out today. Was it important?

JOSH: Oh, no. In comparison to this. A total nothing burger. A 5-4 decision on Medicare reimbursement related. So nothing, honestly.

GLENN: Great. Thank you very much. Appreciate it, Josh. Josh Hammer, opinion editor for Newsweek. And the host of the Josh Hammer show.

GLENN: There are two things trending on twitter right now.

Number one is praise God.

Number two trend is Night of Rage.

Good verses evil.

Build up or tear down.

'Lord, we are SORRY it has taken us this long': BlazeTV hosts react to historic Roe v. Wade decision

Photo by Yasin Ozturk/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

The Supreme Court of the United States officially overturned Roe V. Wade, and the debate over abortion rights has been given back to the states. On this historic day, BlazeTV hosts celebrate the Supreme Court's incredible decision and take a look at some of the insane reactions as the left comes completely undone.

Jason Whitlock: Today will forever stand as a pivotal moment in our nation’s history

The Supreme Court of the United States overturned Roe v. Wade. The decision and the reaction to it have already revealed a lot about our people and politics. Pro-life groups celebrate, pro-choice groups call for “a night of rage,” and Nancy Pelosi just seems completely confused by the United States Constitution.

Glenn Beck reacts LIVE to Roe v. Wade ruling: 'Lord, we are SORRY it has taken us this long'

I never thought that in my lifetime, I would see Roe v. Wade be overturned. But today, that day has come. The Supreme Court has voted 6 to 3 to return decisions about abortion to the states. But this fight isn't over. We are about to see good versus evil side by side. Many states will stand with the unborn. But others will become abortion mills. It's your turn to choose now, America!

Allie Beth Stuckey: 'Praise God, Roe v. Wade is overturned!'

I don't know about you, but I just had the most euphoric feelings. It almost seems too good to be true. I didn't think there was any way that this would actually happen, especially with all the backlash, intimidation, and violence toward the Supreme Court justices. And yet, here we are. Roe v. Wade has been overturned. This is an amazing day!

Dave Rubin: Big disagreement on what happens next now that Roe v. Wade is overturned

Dave Rubin, Libby Emmons, Jeffrey A. Tucker, and David Reaboi debate what will happen in the wake of the Supreme Court’s breaking decision on Roe v. Wade. Now that abortion rights have been pushed back to the states, will there be a summer of massive riots or not? Will the Roe v. Wade ruling make America’s political polarization significantly worse?

Stu Burguiere: Here are the reasons SCOTUS overturned Roe v. Wade

I never thought this would happen. I never thought I would see this day. I just never ever ever ever never ever believed that Roe v. Wade would actually be overturned. I really didn't. But let's take a look at the reasons this day has finally come ...

The Rick & Bubba Show: 'This is history! Unfortunately we're 60 million lives too late'

We were live on the air when news broke of the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned its controversial 1973 Roe v. Wadeopinion, concluding that there is no constitutional right to an abortion.

"The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives," the syllabus of the decision reads.

As expected, the leftist outrage erupted instantaneously, fueled largely by the misinformed idea that overturning Roe v. Wade means abortion will be banned nationwide. But, as stated in the above-mentioned Supreme Court syllabus, the authority has actually been returned to individual states and their duly elected lawmakers.

One such misinformed leftist, Parkland shooting survivor Cameron Kasky, was infuriated that those awful Supreme Court justices "just voted to kill women." So he took to Twitter to urge people to go to the homes of said Supreme Court justices to "let them know how you feel."

"Go to the home of every Supreme Court justice who just voted to kill women. Let them know how you feel," Kasky tweeted.

The backlash was immediate:

Kasky decided to delete his original tweet because he is apparently "sick of republicans talking to [him]." But, unfortunately for Kasky, the internet is indeed forever:

Speaking from the White House, President Joe Biden dutifully helped spread the misinformation about the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, and took the opportunity to prompt voters to elect more Democrats in November so that Congress can write abortion protections into law. Did the president just let slip the real reason Congress hasn't made any effort to start writing such laws in the nearly two months since Justice Samuel Alito's draft opinion was "leaked" in early May?

Watch Glenn Beck and producer Stu Burguere discuss how Biden's speech reveals that Democrats are absolutely terrified of the upcoming midterm elections. Can't watch? Download the podcast here.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.