Glenn Beck: Trashing the fridge




Related Story


NYT - Trashing the Fridge

GLENN: You've got to ask yourself, America, who the heck are we? Trashing the fridge. A few environmentalists are getting rid of their refrigerators for good.

Okay, I mean, I think I need to stop right there. If you are getting rid of your refrigerator for the planet, you're dumb as a box of rocks. About a year ago 32-year-old Rachel Muston decided to go big in her effort to be more environmentally responsible. After mulling the idea over for several weeks, she and her husband -- oh, I've got all kinds of things to say about him -- Scott Young did many things -- did something that many would find unthinkable. They unplugged their refrigerator for good. I love this quote: Ms. Muston said, "It's been a while and we're pretty happy." You're pretty happy? I've had a refrigerator my whole life and I'm very happy! I got ice cream by the bucketful in my freezer downstairs.

"As drastic as the move might seem, a small segment of the green movement has come to regard the refrigerator as unacceptable drain on their energy and is choosing to live without it." I'd like to know, is she a meat eater still? Is she still eating meat?

"In spite of its ubiquity, 99.5% of American homes have one. These advocates say the refrigerator is unnecessary." No, it's not. Hey, Laura Ingalls, I'm not getting rid of the refrigerator. Sorry. I ain't going out to milk the cow, either. I'm not going to go chop down my own environmentally friendly wood and put it in the fireplace. I'm going to turn on a furnace. Why don't you get rid of your stove, too. Why don't you -- here's an idea. Why don't you just put a fireplace in your kitchen, hmmm? You wouldn't have to use any energy. Of course, you'd have to use wood, but you could grow your own forest. Why not do that? "Ma, pa, could we just have a little bit of coal in our little bed warmer?" "No, honey, not coal. It's bad for the environment." "But I'm freezing up here." That's too bad, isn't it?

Ms. Muston estimated that her own refrigerator was in the house when they bought it five years ago. Is it necessary to say it was in the house? We want you to know it was in the house; we're not an environmental criminal! Most likely dates back to much longer, used 1300 kilowatt-hours per year and produced roughly 2,000 pounds of carbon dioxide. Oh, that's all? This is about the same as burning 105 gallons of gasoline. May I ask you a question? To keep your meat, which is environmentally friendly, cold and safe so you don't have to eat beef jerky, to keep your milk which is environmentally unfriendly cold and unspoiled, to keep, you know, any of the other things that might come in plastic containers that are environmentally unfriendly, safe for your family, would you burn 105 gallons of gasoline in a year? I mean, is that worth it or am I just a crazy hate mongering nut job? 105 gallons of gasoline? For a cold glass of milk? For my meat not to be spoiled in the days when I was drinking for a cold glass of beer after mowing the lawn with my environmentally unfriendly lawn mower? I'll burn 1,000 gallons.

"It seems wasteful to me to even use an Energy Star rated refrigerator because I'm getting along fine without one." Good, enjoy that. "She now uses a small freezer in the basement in tandem with a cooler upstairs. The cooler is kept cold by 2 liter soda bottles full of frozen water." Wait a minute. Kept cold by frozen water in 2 liter soda bottles? Those better not be plastic bottles. That's bad for the environment! "When we had the fridge, we were eating a lot of prepared food from the grocery store." She said, "Now the cooler has limited room." Asked whether the couple had to give up any cherished food, she said, "Yeah, cold beer. Scott can't come home and grab a cold beer." Scott, what are you -- you're living with a crazy woman! You don't need beer? Or did you just graduate to the hard stuff?

Then it goes to Ms. Barnes. She also decided to use a cooler which she refilled daily during the summer with ice that she brought home from an ice machine at her office. Well, if you -- excuse me? From an ice machine? So you -- as long as you're not making the ice, you're okay? "There's an ice machine there; I'm just going to use that one." "That worked fine until she began to travel out of town for her job this fall and then the system hit a snag." I hope she's not using a plane.

Stu, do you think she's using an environmentally friendly bike or she's walking? Do you think she's packing all of her hemp clothes in a hemp bag when she goes on the plane? She's not using a plane. She wouldn't do that, would she?

STU: Well, she's using a plane. It's obviously powered by hemp.

GLENN: I hope she doesn't use anything on the plane that was kept in a refrigerator. "In the end she compromised and bought a minifridge. I can drop the refrigerator completely if I had a milkman." I love this: I could drop the refrigerator completely if I had a milkman. Does the milkman magically appear on your doorstep every day? Is that what happens? Just magically the milk -- just, what? You open the little box and the milk is there. He's driving a big milk truck. Let me think now. How many days a week now do you need the milkman to come because you don't have a refrigerator? How many days a week does the milkman have to come and deliver your milk? Which milk comes from a cow which is environmentally unfriendly. Why are you drinking milk? You green idiot!

People on the Internet are trading tips about food storage. Quote: In the winter I put perishables like mayonnaise outside. They cite residents of developing countries and eco celebrities like Colin Beavan. Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute. They're sharing tips on the website about food storage that they get from residents in developing countries. I'm not going to live like the people in Africa! I'm just sayin'. Colin Beavan, the self-proclaimed "No impact" man who ditched his refrigerator during the year that he tried to make no net impact on the environment is proof that people can get along fine without electric refrigeration. Is he still doing it? Or did he only do it to prove a point? If you are still doing it, Colin Beavan, well, then it would be all right, wouldn't it, I guess? "What, I did it. I did it for a year. That was more than you'll do it." Why don't you do it for the rest of your life, mountain man.

Quote: Refrigerator lust is just one of the things driving huge energy use increases in the developing world. Refrigerator lust. I'm trying to remember all of the ten commandments. Thou shalt not kill is in there, I know. Is -- Stu, is thou shalt not put a hemp sock in people's mouth and accidentally lock them in their own basements and then just forget where you put the key, is that against the ten commandments?

STU: Not against the original ten commandments.

GLENN: Probably the new ones?

STU: Yeah, the new ones. I think it was in one of Al Gore's books.

GLENN: I mean, it would be hemp. I would even tie them, tie them up with hemp string.

STU: Really?

GLENN: And they are probably so weak because they haven't had meat.

STU: Yeah, you wouldn't need more than hemp.

GLENN: Yeah, wouldn't need any more than hemp string. Not twine. You know, regular people could get out, you know. They could get out of stuff, you know, twine or something. I don't even tie it very tight and I'll put like a Nerf door up there. But somebody who's not had refrigeration, meat or anything else, "I can't make it up the stairs, which doesn't matter anyway because he put hemp thread around my legs and I can't bust out of it."

STU: Yeah, the good thing about hemp -- because, you know, when you get tied up in rope, then you have that little trick where you can burn a hole through the rope?

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: But if you burn a hole through the hemp, then you just get tired anyway so you don't leave.

GLENN: Yes, but you want to leave because you are thinking about Doritos. "Before making the switch, Mr. Campbell, 53, already hued to a diet focused on long-lived staples like beans and grains but had begun to can the vegetables he grows in the garden behind his house in Columbus, Ohio." Well, this guy at least sounds smart. "And then he uses a small chest freezer for fruit and leftover soups. He has no trouble whipping up a meal. One thing he hasn't been able to adjust to is the reaction from friends. Even people who I meet are energy conscious gasp when they hear I'm going without a refrigerator." Because you're a weirdo. I don't think I've used the word "Weirdo" since I was 7.

"If I was going to examine my life and ask how would I reduce my carbon footprint, maybe I should ask, should I stop eating meat?" Yeah, yeah, maybe you should. "The sort of practical calculus has led many advocates sustainable living to view the unplugged fridge as dubious practices." They point out that it is likely to result in more trips to the store which burns more gas for those who drive and the purchase of food in smaller portions, thus more packaging. It's easy to look at your electric bill and say, "I'm saving energy, I'm saving the planet, but you need to look at the whole supply change.

What a hate monger. How did she get into the New York Times? What a hate monger she is. And then they have tips here on if you have to have a cold beer and, you know, you want to give up your refrigerator, here's what you do. I don't think so. What would it take for you to give up your refrigerator? I can't think of anything. I can't think of anything. What would it take to give up your refrigerator? I mean besides, you know, it's the only way to live? I mean, I can't live any place else because I'm hiding from the oppressive, you know, global controlled governance. I'm living off of sticks and berries and seeds in the middle of a forest.

STU: Isn't the refrigerator one of the top three or four appliances that you couldn't -- I mean, I can't think of anything that I would need more.

GLENN: Okay, there are a few things that I'm not going to get rid of in my house. I'm not getting rid of the toilet. Never am I going back outside. I'm not getting rid of my refrigerator. I'm not getting rid of my heat and air conditioning. Sorry.

STU: Air conditioning, necessity.

GLENN: Kill me. Yeah. I get ready -- you know my car? I'll commute. I'll go from -- I'll just work from home. That's fine. You know, you come up with a way of working from home. Or I'll just live in a city where, you know, I don't have to be, you know, surrounded by millions of people and we'll just be, you know, A Little House on the Prairie town and I'll get into the wagon. "You're going to make slaves out of animals?" Yep, with whips. And then when they're too tired, I'll eat them.

 

The Associated Press has issued a dire warning for abortion providers ahead of the Supreme Court's decision on Roe v. Wade.

According to an article titled "'Heightened alert’: Abortion providers brace for ruling," abortion clinics nationwide are expecting an increase in "protests, harassment, and other violence ... in states where abortion remains legal" if Roe v. Wade is overturned — as a draft opinion leaked in May suggested is likely to happen.

"On the night of last winter’s arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in a case that could end the nationwide right to abortion, people gathered outside a clinic in New Jersey with lawn chairs, a cooler and a flaming torch — a sight that brought to mind lynchings and other horrors of the country’s racist past," the AP article began.

The article did go on to cite two incidents of extreme anti-abortion violence — "the 1993 killing of Dr. David Gunn outside a Florida abortion clinic [and] the 2015 fatal shooting of three people inside a Colorado Planned Parenthood." But there was almost no mention of the ongoing attacks on pregnancy crisis centers by pro-choice activists, including the violent group that calls itself "Jane’s Revenge."

On the radio program, Glenn Beck noted that the closest the current administration has come to calling out Jane’s Revenge was when the Department of Homeland Security published a terror advisory warning of crime on both sides of the Roe v. Wade debate earlier this month. But when was the last time you heard about violent attacks on pro-life centers in the corporate media? There have been several instances of violence by pro-choice proponents, and the Biden administration remains silent.

Watch the video below to hear more from Glenn Beck. Can't watch? Download the podcast here.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

GLENN: Now the righteous generation of the woke has reached such a level of holiness that it cannot possibly be contaminated by name of a less righteous monster like George Washington. Student insists the university must break its ties with white supremacy and systematic racism by canceling its 200 year old name and renaming it. Are you ready? Malcolm X University.

Disney-owned Pixar's latest animated film "Lightyear" was expected to blast off last weekend, but ended up falling way short of box office expectations.

Box office analysts expected the "Toy Story" spin-off to gross $70 million and $85 million domestically and $50-60 million in offshore markets, despite having been barred in at least 14 countries over a controversial same-sex kissing scene, but the film's total haul worldwide wound up at $85.6 million.

Earlier this year, the controversial kissing scene was apparently cut from the film, but the Disney corporation made a show of reinstating it in March amid outrage over Florida Governor Ron DeSantis' (R) Parental Rights in Education bill.

Now, why would such a woke movie flop at the box office on its opening weekend?

"Blame the fact that it doesn’t appeal to girls, blame Disney+ for stealing family moviegoers, blame the lack of an ensemble Toy Story cast, heck, blame everything as Disney/Pixar’s Lightyear didn’t do its magic by internal studio or industry standards this weekend with $51M, close to a third below its lowest $70M pre-release projection," said Deadline.com.

"Variety" lamented that the film's lofty "ambitions were thwarted by heightened competition from Universal’s behemoth 'Jurassic World: Dominion' and Paramount’s high-flying 'Top Gun: Maverick,' as well as little intrigue to watch a slightly esoteric origin story about Buzz Lightyear."

AV Club guessed that maybe "longtime fans have simply grown up and moved on and/or gotten tougher to please."

Both Vanity Fair and Movie Web seemed to think the problem was with the movie's "high concept premise" of making a film based on a film that was supposed to have inspired the Buzz Lightyear toy in "Toy Story."

On the radio program Monday, Glenn Beck, Stu Burguiere, and Pat Gray weren't afraid to call out the obvious reason Disney's latest film fell flat: Parents are just tired of woke politics in their children's movies. It's really not that hard to figure out, Disney.

Watch the video below to catch the conversation. Can't watch? Download the podcast here.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

It’s now common knowledge that America’s mainstream media will do what it can to help the Democrat Party. But a recent op-ed from The Washington Post just took far-left pandering to a whole new level. The article, titled ‘Here’s what voters will get if they cast their ballots based on gas prices,’ tells Americans Democrats are NOT to blame for our sky-high inflation rates and gas prices: ‘There are relatively few tools that the president and Congress can deploy to help boost oil production or moderate overall inflation.’ HOLY COW, Glenn says. In this clip, he unveils the rest of The Washington Post’s INSANE Democrat defense, and he asks and important question: How do they sleep at night?!

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Here we are with the Washington Post. And they have a new very important piece out today. That says, here's what voters will get. If you cast your ballot based on a gas price. Okay? Americans are mad about inflation. They're especially outraged that the gasoline average now is $5 a gallon, nationwide. And history suggests that they may act on that furor. By voting the bums out. But voters should think carefully about what they'll get, if they cast their ballot, base on a gas price. Have you ever -- ever heard this, ever before?

The unexpected inflation tends to cause voters to punish incumbents at the polls. Yeah. Exactly like it's supposed to. The cost of gasoline looms especially large in the public consciousness. If also weighs heavily on presidential approval ratings. But the president doesn't have some super-secret special dial on his desk, that can adjust gas prices. But many voters believe otherwise. Well, let me just give you the rundown on the history of this. Because it seems ironic coming to the press. 1996, the press reported, not Clinton's fault. It's capitalism, and Newt Gingrich's fault. Then 2000. Bush blames Clinton. But it's really Bush's fault. This is typical of an administration that refuses to accept responsibility. Here's another one from CNN. 2001. It's Bush's fault. Then 2004. It's all Bush's fault. Then 2008. It's Bush's and Cheney's fault. Then CNN 2012. Stop blaming Obama. It's not his fault. Then in 2012. Sure, gas prices are high. But it's not as bad as you think. CNN, 2012. America, quit whining about high gas prices. 2018, it's Trump's fault. 2020, now it's Trump's fault. Low oil prices are causing oil company bankruptcies. Then CNN 2021, Biden can't do anything about it. It's not his fault. Okay. All right.

So back to the Washington Post. Republicans hope this widespread confusion will turn the midterms into a referendum on painful economic conditions. And by extension, Democratic leadership. They're counting on voters to protect their homes and dreams. Including their wildest fantasies about cheaper gas. I don't know about you, but I'm not thinking of, you know, the people behind the counter at the gas station all dressed up in something Lacey and revealing. It's not exactly a fantasy for me. You know, gas prices, being low. No. We had that just a year and a half ago. I don't know if anybody else noticed. But when Trump was in, we were for the first time in my lifetime, energy independent. We didn't have to worry about Saudi Arabia, or anybody else. Because we were independent and had cheap gas. For the first time in my life. And who got that done? Oh. Donald Trump.

But wait a minute. He doesn't have any levers to do that, does he? Hmm. There are relatively few tools, said the Washington Post, that the president and Congress can deploy to help boost oil production. What?

Here's an idea. End ESG. End the administration's war on oil. Here's another idea. You really want to get rid of oil? Fine. Get rid of oil. But how about we take a quick break. How about we just break for a minute, slow this down, until we have the other things that are going to replace oil. They also can't control or moderate overall inflation. Isn't that what the Federal Reserve's job is -- that is -- that is their only job. I know they've taken on so much more. That is their job. Their job is to keep inflation under control.

Well, the things that they do have, probably won't make a huge dent in price growth. But they could help a little on the margin. Unfortunately, these are not the things that either party is proposing right now. Democrats are grandstanding about greed, and considering silly stuff such as export bans and price controls. Meanwhile, by the way, those price controls won't seem silly when they happen. Republicans demagogue about President Biden's supposed war on fossil fuels. And socialism. His supposed war on fossil fuels.

That's what he campaigned on. Washington Post says, neither party has a serious plan for dealing with inflation. Overall, or gas prices, specifically. You know what, we don't need the Republican Party. All you need to do is just listen to the people. Are we a republic? Do we have representatives of the people? Because I can tell you, most of the people in America would say, you know what, let's start producing more of our oil. Most of America would say, I want to go green, if we can. That's great. But let's not sacrifice ourself on the God of global warming. I would like the country to continue. I would like my children to be able to eat. Oh. And inflation, here's an idea. Stop spending money. You don't have it. No one is borrowing it. Nobody is giving us the money anymore. We're borrowing it from the fed. Meaning, we're just printing more. Assuming that Russia's war in Ukraine continues to disrupt every energy market, that is such bullcrap, I can't take it. Then voters realistically face a choice, between high gas prices and the rest of Democratic agenda. War, high gas prices, and the rest of the Republican agenda. So what it's worth. Let's consider what the rest of the agenda is, for each party: Biden and fellow Democrats once promised a cradle-to-grave expansion of the safety net. Plus, measures intended to combat climate change.

Love or hate this program, I very much like it. But it's no longer terribly relevant to the choices the voters face this November. Yes, it is. Climate change. That's what's causing all of this. This, and the hostile takeover of the free market, through something called The Great Reset. But Democrat infighting has considerably scaled back their ambitions. Giving constraints laid out by senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema. Who wield critical votes for getting anything done. Democrats have at best had a shot at more modest packages, focused on climate, prescription drugs, and maybe some tax increases on high earners and corporations. But what do the Republicans stand for? Their national leaders won't say. Yeah. I know.

Keep it secret. You know why? Because our national leaders agree with a lot of this stuff, that is going on with the Democratic Party. They don't represent the people. Anyway, even when asked directly, they keep it secret. Their state level rising stars are mostly focused on fighting with Mickey Mouse and drag queens. Really? Are we? Is that how you put it? When -- when our parents are called terrorists for saying, hey. I don't want this Marxist and sex stuff in school.

You dismiss it by saying, we're fighting with Mickey Mouse in drag queens. But if you look at G.O.P. actions taken over the last several years. Including, when they had unified control of the federal government. You get a sense of what Republicans are likely to prioritize. Republicans mostly seem to care about tax cuts for the wealthy. And corporations.

Don't even start with corporations. Do you think the corporations are the friend of anyone, who is on the right? Anyone who doesn't believe in all of this progressive bullcrap? I mean, check the ad campaigns. But if you look at the G.O.P. actions, they just want to find ways to repeal Obamacare. Or otherwise reduce access to health care. Huh. For example, by slashing Medicaid. I know. As somebody who has voted Republican, and I myself am not a Republican. Because I don't want to be tainted with the -- with the -- with the smell of all of the death. But I am all for cutting back on -- I say, we close hospitals, in poor areas. You know, let's just close them down. Kids' medicine. Please, at any time if they're defective. Oh, wait a minute. That sounds like a progressive agenda. They only care about installing judges, who will roll back reproductive rights. Hey, listen to this. They care about supporting a president, who has used the powers of the state, to further his own political and financial interests. Oh, my gosh. Oh, my gosh. Let me give you a couple of quick stories here. Just to -- I just -- let me just point them out real quick here. Story number one. Headline. Buttigieg says the fed -- the feds have power to airlines to hire more workers, amid travel delays. Let me see here. I remember the republic -- or, the Democrats were very upset at Ronald Reagan. Because he forced union workers to go back into work, so we could keep the skies open, because none of them would work the control towers. So they had a real problem with that. Buttigieg is saying, he can tell the airlines, you don't have enough workers. Hire them.

Where, in the Constitution can you find that? That's fascism. Oh, here's the other. This one from the Washington Examiner. Biden's bid to expand Obamacare. The Biden administration is unlawfully trying to expand Obamacare. The Internal Revenue Service has published a proposed regulation. That would make an additional 5 million people eligible for premium subsidies. The IRS proposal is unlawful, but the administration will do it anyway. Here's the background. Obamacare statute created premium subsidies for people who buy insurance through exchanges. Congress restricted those subsidies for people with low and moderate incomes. Or at no other source of health insurance. In addition to Medicare and Medicaid recipients, 155 million Americans with job-based coverage are prohibited from claiming the credits.

The law carved out one exception. If a company plan required a full-time employee to contribute more than 9.5 percent of household income for self only coverage. Then the worker and his or her family members are eligible for the subsidies. So this has gone back and forth with Congress. And they won't do it. Because it will add $45 billion to the deficit. Just in the next ten years. It's called the family glitch. The urban institute, estimates the regulation would reduce the number of uninsured, by around 190,000. Because why? At an average cost of $4.5 billion, taxpayers are going to pay 23,000. 684, per newly insured person each year. Which is kind of not so good. So it would never pass Congress. And so now the IRS is going to do it, even though they know it's illegal. So what is it they care about supporting a president who used the powers of the state, to further his own political and financial interests? Financial interests, China. Please.

They care about supporting a president, whose few purported diplomatic achievements. Few? Few? The world was headed towards peace. The Middle East was having peace. Like I've never seen in my lifetime. In retrospect, they largely look like an excuse to meet potential investors who can might fund Trump aides' new private equity. Are you kidding me? This guy who is schlepping his son with him, everywhere he goes. And you're blaming this on Trump?

They care about defending at all costs, a president who cheered on the mob. Seeking to hang his own vice president. Speaking of mobs, how about the people who are threatening to kill our Supreme Court justices? Because that kind of sounds like the same thing to me. And what is the White House saying? Nothing. What are the Democrats doing? Reluctantly voting to give the Supreme Court justices and their family security. And then they have this one. And then they care about undermining the integrity of our election system. And overturning the will of the voters. If and when tallies don't go their own way. Oh, my gosh. I think I'm going to start vomiting blood. I mean, holy cow. Election deniers are already laying the groundwork to overturn the will of the voters in the future. Through legal and administrative changes at the state and federal levels. They're only changing it back to what it was. The special exemption for covid!

Oh. I can't -- I mean, how do they even -- how do they sleep at night? How do they sleep at night? Well, I guess if it's in the winter, they probably sleep well. Because it's very warm in hell.