Glenn Beck: Newspapers too big to fail?

GLENN: Here's a strange story. Senator Cardin introduces a bill that would allow American newspapers to operate as a nonprofit organization. U.S. senator from Maryland Benjamin Cardin introduced legislation today that would allow newspapers to become nonprofit organizations in an effort to help the faltering industry survive. The Newspaper Revitalization Act, it's weird. I saw a newspaper and I thought -- let me tell you what I just read in my head. The Steam Engine Revitalization Act. But it doesn't say steam engine. It says newspaper. Anyway, would allow newspapers to operate as nonprofits if they choose under a 501(c)(3) status for educational purposes, similar to public broadcasting. Under this arrangement newspapers would not be allowed to make any political contributions but they would be allowed to freely report on all issues including political campaigns, advertising and subscription revenue would be tax-exempt. And contributions to support coverage or operations could be tax deductible. This is fantastic. I bet -- you know what? Clear Channel is in trouble. CBS and ABC are in trouble. I bet this is right around the corner for Clear Channel. Don't you think, Stu? We can be -- talk radio could be used as educational purposes.

STU: Oh, absolutely.

GLENN: Sure.

STU: We're providing unbiased information.

GLENN: We wouldn't necessarily be able to, what was it, endorse a politician.

STU: No.

GLENN: But we could report on all of the issues.

STU: Right, exactly.

GLENN: We could put our opinions in freely.

STU: Real quick, I don't know if anyone's noticed that newspapers actually do endorse candidates. I can't remember the last time you endorsed a candidate. You've said who you voted for.

GLENN: I said who I voted for but I never endorsed anybody.

STU: It has nothing to do that people wouldn't care. Nothing to do with that.

GLENN: No.

STU: No.

GLENN: It wouldn't have anything to do with me saying this is who I voted for, but you're a dope, you're dumb as a box of rocks if you just take my... "Glenn Beck voted for this guy."

STU: But the journalists can put together a product which tells you which way you should vote in a particular race.

GLENN: Well, because they are smarter than you are.

STU: Right.

GLENN: They are smarter than you are.

STU: I always forget.

GLENN: I know, because you are not smart enough, dummy.

STU: I know. Look how they are running their business! You can tell they are smart because of the success of their business.

GLENN: You are exactly right. And you know why this is not going to be a problem if they, you know, have no taxes? You know, if they are a nonprofit organization?

STU: No.

GLENN: You don't know?

STU: I don't know.

GLENN: Oh, this is great. The measure is targeted to preserve local newspapers serving communities and not large newspaper conglomerates.

STU: Oh, good.

GLENN: All right? New York Times serving the community.

STU: Right.

GLENN: Because newspaper profits have been falling in recent years.

STU: What?

GLENN: No substantial loss of federal revenue is expected. Because they're not making any money.

STU: Oh. Thank God.

GLENN: "While we have lots of news sources, we rely on newspapers for in-depth reporting that follows important issues, records events, exposes misdeeds." Oh, yeah, they're exposing misdeeds, aren't they?

STU: But Glenn, how long does it take you to read a newspaper?

GLENN: Hmmm? I don't read one.

STU: Just say if you were to read a newspaper from front to back, I mean, how long would it take? An hour? Probably less than three hours, huh?

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: Because we're on for three hours. So we have the opportunity to do three times the depth. So I would assume we're --

GLENN: No. We just, that's all we do.

STU: Jeez, all these things I keep forgetting.

GLENN: I used to read five newspapers a day. I used to read five newspapers a day. Do you remember coming into Radio City every day and you'd see me and I'd be there? I had been there for hours and one of the researchers was there. They also were there and I'd mark them all up? Remember? I'd come in every Monday and I had gathered all of the stories and cut them out from Saturday and Sunday all the newspapers?

STU: I remember you'd always have ink all over your fingers.

GLENN: Yeah, yeah. I actually have surgical gloves at home, a box of surgical gloves because I read so many newspapers, my hands would just be completely black, you know, and the kids would come over or something and I want to hug them or something. So I'd take off the surgical gloves because my hands would be full of ink. Not kidding you. Not kidding you. I don't do that anymore. I found this thing called the Internet.

STU: Okay, all right.

GLENN: Okay? What I can do is I can go and find the stories.

STU: What do you mean find them?

GLENN: You just go on and you just go to these different websites like FoxNews.com or whatever.

STU: Okay.

GLENN: And you can go and you can find the stories and then you can also --

STU: Fox News mails you the paper with the stories on it?

GLENN: No, no, they don't mail it. You cut and paste the link and then I send it to myself at Radio City and then I just click on it and there's the story.

STU: And then you print it out as a news story?

GLENN: No, you don't print it out.

STU: Okay.

GLENN: It's amazing. It's amazing.

STU: This is a computer?

GLENN: Look, I don't even know if this technology is stable. So I don't want to get into it right now.

STU: Do you cut the screen with the scissors?

GLENN: Just look for things in the future. It will be an -- I predict it will be in some of the wealthier homes in America within the next 50 years. It's called the --

STU: That soon?

GLENN: Intranet.

STU: Wow.

GLENN: But only the creme de la creme. It's like but in 100, maybe 150 years, you could be able to get that information, download it right onto your phone.

STU: What are the environmental impacts of this device, this device you are speaking of?

GLENN: Well, that's where it kind of gets dicey. You are not killing trees.

STU: Oh.

GLENN: Yeah, you are not killing any trees. And you're not -- see, here's where the environmentalists, you know, they really, they're pushing for this intranet and this is why I'm really pushing for the newspapers to be saved. Because the newspapers are the ones really, have been really leading the charge on this global warming thing. I used to read in the paper all the time, "Hey, global warming, global warming, it's real, it's real, we've got to do our part, we've got to stop all this nonsense." And it was funny because I would read it and I would think I'm reading this on what used to be a tree. And then they took this poison ink and they put it on the newspaper. You know, that's not good for the environment. And then they took it and they tied it up in a plastic bag and then they bound them in these big heavy zip, you know, strip things and then they put them on a wood crate, also made from a tree. And then they would take a forklift, which runs on fuel, and they would put that big stack of newspapers onto the back of what was then called a truck that also was burning fossil fuels. And then they drive that truck all around the city and they would drop these newspapers off. Some of them would be read, some of them wouldn't. But all of that plastic, all of that plastic, all those dead trees, boom, garbage. Garbage. Some people would recycle in those olden days. Others wouldn't recycle. So some of it was lost, some of it wasn't. But the trash, the fuel used, the burning of resources, it really kind of warmed my heart every time that I saw that because I'd see the hypocrisy of someone in the newspaper business telling us that we've got to do our part and have a fluorescent light bulb. While they were printing stuff on dead trees and shipping it around in giant trucks. It was hysterical and I loved that, but the intranet that I believe will be a part of our future -- I'm going out on a limb here. Again I don't -- I'm not a futurist but I believe the intranet --&n bsp;Stu, could you look that up? I-N-T-R-A-N-E-T.

STU: Intranet?

GLENN: Intranet. I'm just saying.

STU: You are going to have to be a little more particular. There's 18 million --

GLENN: Try information superhighway.

STU: Information -- is that three words or two?

GLENN: Information is one word. Superhighway would be two. It would be three words. It may only be one word. Do you have anything?

STU: Yeah. Just -- well, you have to be more specific. There's 16.3 million things.

GLENN: I can't narrow it down.

STU: Should I put tree in there? Would that --

GLENN: No, I don't --

STU: Hang on. I'll just put information superhighway tree. Now we're down to 522,000. This is working. Ink, should I put ink in there?

GLENN: No, you know what? Stop that search. Put information superhighway, the death of newspapers.

STU: Death of newspapers.

GLENN: Newspapers may be interchangeable with the steam engine.

STU: Do you want -- should that be in the search, too?

GLENN: Steam engine? Sure. See if we can get any --

STU: Now we're down to 4400.

GLENN: 4400? Okay. Well, we'll try to narrow it down from those 4400 choices.

STU: But where do I get my news that's like two days old?

GLENN: The newspaper. They will be there.

STU: They will be there for me still if I want to hear something that happened?

GLENN: Absolutely they will be there. Nonprofit. They have got to do something. We just can't let these bastions of information, we just can't -- you know, Stu -- Stu, it's like when you think of America, think of colonial America, okay?

STU: I'm thinking of colonial America.

GLENN: You are thinking colonial America?

STU: Uh-huh.

GLENN: I mean, you are thinking of the patriots, right?

STU: Yeah, yeah.

GLENN: You are thinking of George Washington, you are thinking of Benjamin Franklin, you are thinking of all these great people. We didn't just let the tricorner hat go.

STU: No.

GLENN: Of course not. We propped those businesses up. Everybody's like, I don't want a hat with three corners.

STU: Right. Everyone's like, wait a minute, why do I want a hat with three corners, why all of a sudden is it being turned into a charity? We're like, well, it's a three-cornered hat.

GLENN: Hello, it's a three-corner hat. The tricorner hat is a symbol of America. You think George Washington, you know, was just wearing -- he could have worn any hat. He wore that one. Those don't go out of style. And if they go out of business, we would probe --

STU: Right. And it's like right now you can buy a powdered wig without any tax ramifications because it's a charity.

GLENN: It's a charity. You know, we need the tricorner hat and we need the powdered wig. We need them. We need them. I was just saying this to my wife just the other night as we were sitting in our cave.

(Legalzoom.com)

VOICE: Today in the New York Times, President Barack Obama is off and running. We answer the question America most wants to know in an exclusive one-on-one interview: What brand shoe does the president prefer. Plus, Michelle dishes on her favorite appetizers. It's all today in the Times.

GLENN: No, seriously I think we should -- I mean, a lot of these guys wouldn't become a nonprofit because that's the kind of stuff that Americans need to know, you know?

VOICE: Also today in the New York Times, is Chuck Schumer really a superhero. Plus, the best wines for over $700 a bottle. The stories you need today in the Times.

GLENN: See, some people would say they're slanted or they're snobby but I just don't see that from --

VOICE: In today's edition of the New York Times, it's the one thing America doesn't want the terrorists to know, the location or movement of our troops in Iraq or Afghanistan. We've got them all on Page A-2 just beneath the title Betrayal and Adventure today in the Times.

GLENN: See, I think they are providing a service that you just can't get elsewhere.

VOICE: Today in the Times, another day, another debate settled. Global warming, caused by man. Case closed. Pick up a copy of the Times today.

GLENN: What? Case closed.

VOICE: Today in the Times. Debate's over. Israel is wrong. Pick up a copy of the Times today.

GLENN: (Laughing)

Ryan: Bernie at the disco

Photo by Sean Ryan

Saturday at El Malecón, we waited for the Democratic socialist. He had the wild white hair like a monk and the thick glasses and the booming voice full of hacks and no niceties.

Photo by Sean Ryan

The venue had been redecorated since we visited a few nights before when we chatted with Castro. It didn't even feel like the same place. No bouncy castle this time.

Photo by Sean Ryan

A black curtain blocked the stage, giving the room a much-needed depth.

Behind the podium, two rows of mostly young people, all holding Bernie signs, all so diverse and picturesque and strategic.

Photo by Sean Ryan

Lots of empty seats. Poor showing of Bernie fans for a Saturday afternoon. At one point, someone from Bernie's staff offered us seats in the audience, as if eager to fill up those seats however possible.

There were about 75 people in the dancehall, a place built for reunions and weddings and all those other festivities. But for a few hours on Saturday, August 10, 2019, it turned serious and wild for "Unidos Con Bernie."

Photo by Sean Ryan

People had been murmuring about Sanders' speech from the night before at Wing Ding. By all appearances, he had developed a raving lust to overthrow Trump. He had even promised, with his wife just out of view, that, were he elected, he'd end white nationalism in America. For good.

El Malecón lacked its previous air of celebration. It had undertaken a brooding yet defiant spirit. Media were sparse. Four cameras faced the podium. Three photographers, one of whom had been at nearly all the same events as us. A few of the staffers frowned at an empty row of chairs, because there weren't that many chairs to begin with.

At the entrance, Bernie staff handed out headsets that translated English to Spanish or Spanish to English, depending on who the speaker was. The translators stood behind the bar, 20 feet from the podium, and spoke into a lip-ribbon microphone.

Bernie's staff was probably the coolest, by far. As in, they looked cool and acted stylishly. Jeans. Sandals. Careworn blazers. Tattoos. One lad had a black Levi's shirt with lush crimson roses even though he wasn't a cowboy or a ranch-hand. Mustaches. Quirky hats. A plain green sundress. Some of them wore glasses, big clunking frames.

Photo by Sean Ryan

The outfits were distinctly Bernie. As Bernie as the tie-dyed "BERNIE" shirts for sale outside the club. Or later, at the Hilton, like a Grateful Dead cassette stand.

Immigration was the theme, and everyone in the audience bore some proof of a journey. Because America offers life, freedom, and hope.

Sanders' own father emigrated from Poland to America at 17, a high school dropout who could barely speak English. As a Jew, he'd faced religious persecution.

Within one generation, Bernie Sanders' father contributed to the highest stratum of American society. In one generation, near hopelessness had transformed into Democracy, his son a congressman with a serious chance at the presidency.

Photo by Sean Ryan

That's the beauty of America. Come here broken and empty and gutted and voiceless. And, within your lifetime, you can mend yourself then become a pillar of society. Then, your son can become the President of the United States of America!

Four people gave speeches before Sanders. They took their time, excited and nervous. They putzed. Because how often do you get to introduce a presidential frontrunner?

All the native English speakers jammed their earpieces when the woman with the kind and dark energy took the stage.

Photo by Sean Ryan

She mumbled in Spanish and did not look up and said that, when her parents died, she couldn't go home for the funeral. She fought back tears. She swallowed hard to shock herself calm. And the room engulfed each silence between every word.

It felt more like a therapy session than a political rally. A grueling therapy session at that. Was that what drew people to Bernie Sanders, that deep anguish? That brisk hope? Or, rather, the cessation of it, through Sanders? And, of course, the resultant freedom? Was it what gave Sanders a saintlike ability to lead people into the realm of the confessional? Did he have enough strength to lead a revolution?

Photo by Sean Ryan

While other frontrunners hocked out money for appearances, like the studio lights, Sanders spent money on translators and ear-pieces. The impression I got was that he would gladly speak anywhere. To anyone. He had the transitory energy you can capture in the writings of Gandhi.

Photo by Sean Ryan

I'm not saying he's right or wrong — I will never make that claim, about any of the candidates, because that's not the point of this, not the point of journalism, amen — what I'm saying is he has the brutal energy of someone who can take the subway after a soiree or rant about life by a tractor or chuck it up with Sarah Silverman, surrounded wherever he goes.

Without the slightest fanfare, Sanders emerged from behind the black curtain. The woman at the podium gasped a little. The room suctioned forward when he entered. In part because he was so nonchalant. And, again. That magnetism to a room when a famous or powerful or charming person enters. Not many people have it. Not many can keep it. Even fewer know how to brace it, to cull it on demand. But several of the candidates did. One or two even had something greater.

Photo by Sean Ryan

I'll only say that Bernie had it with a bohemian fervor, like he was a monk stranded in a big city that he slowly brings to God.

"We have a President who, for the first time in my lifetime, who is a President who is a racist," he shouted. "Who is a xenophobe and anti-immigrant. Who is a sexist. Who is a religious bigot. And who, is a homophobe. And, what is very disappointing is that, when we have a President, we do not necessarily expect to agree with him, or her, on every issue. But we do believe that one of the obligations is to bring people to-geth-ah. As Americans."

Photo by Sean Ryan

After listening silently for several minutes, the audience clapped. Their sweet response felt cultish. But, then again, what doesn't feel cultish these days? So this was cultish like memes are cultish, in a striving-to-understand kind of way.

"The essence of our campaign is in fact to bring people together," he said. "Whether they're black, or white, or latino, or Native American, or Asian-American. We understand that we are Americans."

At times, this meant sharing a common humanity. Others, it had a slightly more disruptive feel. Which worked. Sometimes all we want is revolution. To be wild without recourse. To overthrow. To pass through the constraints of each day. To survive. The kind of rowdy stuff that makes for good poetry but destroys credit lines. Sanders radiated with this intensity, like a reclusive philosopher returning to society, from his cave to homes and beds and fences and maybe electricity.

Photo by Sean Ryan

But, as he says, his revolution would involve healthcare and wages and tuition, not beheadings and purges and starvation.

Seeing the Presidential candidates improvise was amazing. They did it constantly. They would turn any of their beliefs into a universal statement. And Sanders did this without trying. So he avoided doing the unbearably arrogant thing of pretending to speak like a native Guatemalan, and he looked at the group of people, and he mumbled in his cloudy accent:

"My Spanish — is not so good."

Photo by Sean Ryan

This is the same and the opposite of President Trump's Everyman way of speaking English like an American. Of speaking American.

Often, you know what Sanders will say next. You can feel it. And, anytime this happened, it brought comfort to the room.

Like, it surprised no one when he said that he would reinstate DACA on his first day in office. It still drew applause.

But other times, he expressed wild ideas with poetic clarity. And his conclusions arrived at unusual junctures. Not just in comparison to Republicans. To all of them. Bernie was the Tupac of the 2020 election. And, to him, President Trump was Suge Knight, the evil force behind it all.

"Donald Trump is an idiot," he shouted.

Photo by Sean Ryan

Everybody loved that. Everybody clapped and whooped and some even whistled like they were outside and not in a linoleum-floor dancehall.

"Go get 'em, Bernie," someone in the back shouted.

This was the only Sanders appearance with no protestors.

"Let me say this about the border," he shouted. And everybody listened to every thunking syllable. He probably could have spoken without a mic. Booming voice. Loud and clear. Huddling into that heavy Vermont slug accent.

They'll say many many things about Bernie. One being, you never had to lean forward to hear him. In person, even more so. He's less frail. More dynamic.

Photo by Sean Ryan

Despite the shoddiness of the venue, there was a sign language interpreter. Most of the rallies had a designated interpreter.

"If you work 40 hours a week you shouldn't be living in poverty," he shouted, provoking chants and applause from the audience, as if he were talking about them. Maybe he was.

An anecdote about the people at an emergency food shelf blended into the livable wage of $15 an hour. He shifted into his spiel about tuition-free college and pointed at the audience, "You're not doing well," then at the kids behind him, "they are." He craned his head sideways and back. "Do your homework," he told said.

Laughter.

Half of the kids looked like they hadn't eaten in days. Maybe it was their unusual situation, a few feet from Bernie Sanders at a stucco community center.

Before the room could settle, Sanders wove through a plan for how to cancel debt.

Did he have a solution?

Tax Wall Street, he shouted.

Photo by Sean Ryan

And he made it sound easy. "Uno dos trey," he said. "That's my Spanish for today."

A serious man, he shoved through his speech like a tank hurtling into dense jungle. He avoided many of the typical politician gimmicks. Proof that he did not practice every expression in front of a mirror. That he did not hide his accent. That he did not preen his hair. That he did not smile for a precise amount of time, depending on the audience. That he did not pretend to laugh.

Photo by Sean Ryan

He laughed when humor overtook him. But it was genuine. With none of the throaty recoil you hear in forced laughter.

"I want everyone to take a deep breath," he said. And a palpable lightness spread through the room, because a deep breath can solve a lot of problems.

Photo by Sean Ryan

Then he roused some more. "Healthcare is a human right," he shouted. "A human privilege," he shouted. He told them that he lives 50 miles from the Canadian border in Burlington, Vermont, and healthcare works better up north.

Each candidate had a bad word, and Sanders' was "corporate."

Photo by Sean Ryan

At every speech, he mentioned "corporate media" with the same distrust and unpleasantness that conservatives derive from the term "mainstream media." Another would be "fake news," as popularized by Sanders' sworn enemy. Either way it's the same media. Just different motivations that irk different people.

But the discrepancies varied. Meaning two opposing political movements disliked the same thing, but for opposite reasons.
It sounded odd, Sanders' accusation that the media were against him. The media love Bernie. I can confirm this both anecdotally and judiciously. Yes, okay, in 2016, the media appeared to have sided with Hillary Clinton. As a result, Sanders was publicly humiliated. Because Clinton took a mafioso approach to dealing with opponents, and Sanders was her only roadblock.

Imagine if a major political organization devoted part of each day to agitating your downfall. And then you fail. And who's fault is it?

Sanders wanted to know: those negative ads targeting him, who paid for them?

Photo by Sean Ryan

Corporations, of course. Corporations that hated radicals like him. And really was he so radical? He listed off the possibilities: Big pharma, insurance companies, oil companies.

Because he had become a revolutionary, to them. To many.

He said it with certainty, although he often didn't have to say it at all. This spirit of rebellion had become his brand. He would lead the wild Americans into a utopia.

But just as quickly, he would attack. Trump, as always, was the target.

He called Trump the worst president in American history.

"The fates are Yuge," he shouted.

The speech ended as informally as it had begun. And Sanders' trance over the audience evaporated, replaced by that suction energy. Everyone rushed closer and closer to the man as Neil Young's "Keep on Rockin in the Free World" blared. Sanders leaned into the podium and said, "If anyone wants to form a line, we can do some selfies."

Photo by Sean Ryan

It was like meeting Jesus for some of the people.

There he was, at El Malecón. No stage lights, no makeup, no stylist behind the curtain. Just him and his ideas and his erratic hand commotion.

Then a man holding a baby leaned in for a photo. He and Sanders chatted. And, I kid you not, the whole time the baby is staring at Bernie Sanders like he's the image of God, looking right up at him, with this glow, this understanding.

Bernie, if you're reading this, I'd like to suggest that — if this election doesn't work for you — you could be the next Pope.

New installments come Mondays and Thursdays. Check out my Twitter. Email me at kryan@blazemedia.com

On the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" Monday, Harvard Law professor and lawyer on President Donald Trump's impeachment defense team Alan Dershowitz explains the history of impeachment and its process, why the framers did not include abuse of power as criteria for a Constitutional impeachment, why the Democrats are framing their case the way they are, and what to look for in the upcoming Senate trial.

Dershowitz argued that "abuse of power" -- one of two articles of impeachment against Trump approved by House Democrats last month -- is not an impeachable act.

"There are two articles of impeachment. The second is 'obstruction of Congress.' That's just a false accusation," said Dershowitz. "But they also charge him, in the Ukraine matter, with abuse of power. But abuse of power was discussed by the framers (of the U.S. Constitution) ... the framers refused to include abuse of power because it was too broad, too open-ended.

"In the words of James Madison, the father of our Constitution, it would lead presidents to serve at the will of Congress. And that's exactly what the framers didn't want, which is why they were very specific and said a president can be impeached only for treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors," he added.

"What's alleged against President Trump is not criminal," added Dershowitz. "If they had criminal issues to allege, you can be sure they would have done it. If they could establish bribery or treason, they would have done it already. But they didn't do it. They instead used this concept of abuse of power, which is so broad and general ... any president could be charged with it."

Watch the video below to hear more details:



Use code BECK to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

On Friday's radio program, Bill O'Reilly joins Glenn Beck discuss the possible outcomes for the Democrats in 2020.

Why are former President Barack and First Lady Michelle Obama working overtime to convince Americans they're more moderate than most of the far-left Democratic presidential candidates? Is there a chance of a Michelle Obama vs. Donald Trump race this fall?

O'Reilly surmised that a post-primary nomination would probably be more of a "Bloomberg play." He said Michael Bloomberg might actually stand a chance at the Democratic nomination if there is a brokered convention, as many Democratic leaders are fearfully anticipating.

"Bloomberg knows he doesn't really have a chance to get enough delegates to win," O'Reilly said. "He's doing two things: If there's a brokered convention, there he is. And even if there is a nominee, it will probably be Biden, and Biden will give [him] Secretary of State or Secretary of Treasury. That's what Bloomberg wants."

Watch the video below to catch more of the conversation:

Use code BECK to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.


On the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" Friday, award-winning investigative reporter John Solomon, a central figure in the impeachment proceedings, explained his newly filed lawsuit, which seeks the records of contact between Ukraine prosecutors and the U.S. Embassy officials in Kiev during the 2016 election.

The records would provide valuable information on what really happened in Ukraine, including what then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter were doing with Ukrainian energy company, Burisma Holdings, Solomon explained.

The documents, which the State Department has withheld thus far despite repeated requests for release by Solomon, would likely shed light on the alleged corruption that President Donald Trump requested to be investigated during his phone call with the president of Ukraine last year.

With the help of Southeastern Legal Foundation, Solomon's lawsuit seeks to compel the State Department to release the critical records. Once released, the records are expected to reveal, once and for all, exactly why President Trump wanted to investigate the dealings in Ukraine, and finally expose the side of the story that Democrats are trying to hide in their push for impeachment.

"It's been a one-sided story so far, just like the beginning of the Russia collusion story, right? Everybody was certain on Jan. 9 of 2017 that the Christopher Steele dossier was gospel. And our president was an agent of Russia. Three years later, we learned that all of that turned out to be bunk, " Solomon said.

"The most important thing about politics, and about investigations, is that there are two sides to a story. There are two pieces of evidence. And right now, we've only seen one side of it," he continued. "I think we'll learn a lot about what the intelligence community, what the economic and Treasury Department community was telling the president. And I bet the story was way more complicated than the narrative that [House Intelligence Committee Chairman] Adam Schiff [D-Calif.] has woven so far."

Watch the video below to catch more of the conversation:

Use code BECK to save $10 on one year of BlazeTV.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.