Glenn Beck: Newspapers too big to fail?

GLENN: Here's a strange story. Senator Cardin introduces a bill that would allow American newspapers to operate as a nonprofit organization. U.S. senator from Maryland Benjamin Cardin introduced legislation today that would allow newspapers to become nonprofit organizations in an effort to help the faltering industry survive. The Newspaper Revitalization Act, it's weird. I saw a newspaper and I thought -- let me tell you what I just read in my head. The Steam Engine Revitalization Act. But it doesn't say steam engine. It says newspaper. Anyway, would allow newspapers to operate as nonprofits if they choose under a 501(c)(3) status for educational purposes, similar to public broadcasting. Under this arrangement newspapers would not be allowed to make any political contributions but they would be allowed to freely report on all issues including political campaigns, advertising and subscription revenue would be tax-exempt. And contributions to support coverage or operations could be tax deductible. This is fantastic. I bet -- you know what? Clear Channel is in trouble. CBS and ABC are in trouble. I bet this is right around the corner for Clear Channel. Don't you think, Stu? We can be -- talk radio could be used as educational purposes.

STU: Oh, absolutely.

GLENN: Sure.

STU: We're providing unbiased information.

GLENN: We wouldn't necessarily be able to, what was it, endorse a politician.

STU: No.

GLENN: But we could report on all of the issues.

STU: Right, exactly.

GLENN: We could put our opinions in freely.

STU: Real quick, I don't know if anyone's noticed that newspapers actually do endorse candidates. I can't remember the last time you endorsed a candidate. You've said who you voted for.

GLENN: I said who I voted for but I never endorsed anybody.

STU: It has nothing to do that people wouldn't care. Nothing to do with that.

GLENN: No.

STU: No.

GLENN: It wouldn't have anything to do with me saying this is who I voted for, but you're a dope, you're dumb as a box of rocks if you just take my... "Glenn Beck voted for this guy."

STU: But the journalists can put together a product which tells you which way you should vote in a particular race.

GLENN: Well, because they are smarter than you are.

STU: Right.

GLENN: They are smarter than you are.

STU: I always forget.

GLENN: I know, because you are not smart enough, dummy.

STU: I know. Look how they are running their business! You can tell they are smart because of the success of their business.

GLENN: You are exactly right. And you know why this is not going to be a problem if they, you know, have no taxes? You know, if they are a nonprofit organization?

STU: No.

GLENN: You don't know?

STU: I don't know.

GLENN: Oh, this is great. The measure is targeted to preserve local newspapers serving communities and not large newspaper conglomerates.

STU: Oh, good.

GLENN: All right? New York Times serving the community.

STU: Right.

GLENN: Because newspaper profits have been falling in recent years.

STU: What?

GLENN: No substantial loss of federal revenue is expected. Because they're not making any money.

STU: Oh. Thank God.

GLENN: "While we have lots of news sources, we rely on newspapers for in-depth reporting that follows important issues, records events, exposes misdeeds." Oh, yeah, they're exposing misdeeds, aren't they?

STU: But Glenn, how long does it take you to read a newspaper?

GLENN: Hmmm? I don't read one.

STU: Just say if you were to read a newspaper from front to back, I mean, how long would it take? An hour? Probably less than three hours, huh?

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: Because we're on for three hours. So we have the opportunity to do three times the depth. So I would assume we're --

GLENN: No. We just, that's all we do.

STU: Jeez, all these things I keep forgetting.

GLENN: I used to read five newspapers a day. I used to read five newspapers a day. Do you remember coming into Radio City every day and you'd see me and I'd be there? I had been there for hours and one of the researchers was there. They also were there and I'd mark them all up? Remember? I'd come in every Monday and I had gathered all of the stories and cut them out from Saturday and Sunday all the newspapers?

STU: I remember you'd always have ink all over your fingers.

GLENN: Yeah, yeah. I actually have surgical gloves at home, a box of surgical gloves because I read so many newspapers, my hands would just be completely black, you know, and the kids would come over or something and I want to hug them or something. So I'd take off the surgical gloves because my hands would be full of ink. Not kidding you. Not kidding you. I don't do that anymore. I found this thing called the Internet.

STU: Okay, all right.

GLENN: Okay? What I can do is I can go and find the stories.

STU: What do you mean find them?

GLENN: You just go on and you just go to these different websites like FoxNews.com or whatever.

STU: Okay.

GLENN: And you can go and you can find the stories and then you can also --

STU: Fox News mails you the paper with the stories on it?

GLENN: No, no, they don't mail it. You cut and paste the link and then I send it to myself at Radio City and then I just click on it and there's the story.

STU: And then you print it out as a news story?

GLENN: No, you don't print it out.

STU: Okay.

GLENN: It's amazing. It's amazing.

STU: This is a computer?

GLENN: Look, I don't even know if this technology is stable. So I don't want to get into it right now.

STU: Do you cut the screen with the scissors?

GLENN: Just look for things in the future. It will be an -- I predict it will be in some of the wealthier homes in America within the next 50 years. It's called the --

STU: That soon?

GLENN: Intranet.

STU: Wow.

GLENN: But only the creme de la creme. It's like but in 100, maybe 150 years, you could be able to get that information, download it right onto your phone.

STU: What are the environmental impacts of this device, this device you are speaking of?

GLENN: Well, that's where it kind of gets dicey. You are not killing trees.

STU: Oh.

GLENN: Yeah, you are not killing any trees. And you're not -- see, here's where the environmentalists, you know, they really, they're pushing for this intranet and this is why I'm really pushing for the newspapers to be saved. Because the newspapers are the ones really, have been really leading the charge on this global warming thing. I used to read in the paper all the time, "Hey, global warming, global warming, it's real, it's real, we've got to do our part, we've got to stop all this nonsense." And it was funny because I would read it and I would think I'm reading this on what used to be a tree. And then they took this poison ink and they put it on the newspaper. You know, that's not good for the environment. And then they took it and they tied it up in a plastic bag and then they bound them in these big heavy zip, you know, strip things and then they put them on a wood crate, also made from a tree. And then they would take a forklift, which runs on fuel, and they would put that big stack of newspapers onto the back of what was then called a truck that also was burning fossil fuels. And then they drive that truck all around the city and they would drop these newspapers off. Some of them would be read, some of them wouldn't. But all of that plastic, all of that plastic, all those dead trees, boom, garbage. Garbage. Some people would recycle in those olden days. Others wouldn't recycle. So some of it was lost, some of it wasn't. But the trash, the fuel used, the burning of resources, it really kind of warmed my heart every time that I saw that because I'd see the hypocrisy of someone in the newspaper business telling us that we've got to do our part and have a fluorescent light bulb. While they were printing stuff on dead trees and shipping it around in giant trucks. It was hysterical and I loved that, but the intranet that I believe will be a part of our future -- I'm going out on a limb here. Again I don't -- I'm not a futurist but I believe the intranet --&n bsp;Stu, could you look that up? I-N-T-R-A-N-E-T.

STU: Intranet?

GLENN: Intranet. I'm just saying.

STU: You are going to have to be a little more particular. There's 18 million --

GLENN: Try information superhighway.

STU: Information -- is that three words or two?

GLENN: Information is one word. Superhighway would be two. It would be three words. It may only be one word. Do you have anything?

STU: Yeah. Just -- well, you have to be more specific. There's 16.3 million things.

GLENN: I can't narrow it down.

STU: Should I put tree in there? Would that --

GLENN: No, I don't --

STU: Hang on. I'll just put information superhighway tree. Now we're down to 522,000. This is working. Ink, should I put ink in there?

GLENN: No, you know what? Stop that search. Put information superhighway, the death of newspapers.

STU: Death of newspapers.

GLENN: Newspapers may be interchangeable with the steam engine.

STU: Do you want -- should that be in the search, too?

GLENN: Steam engine? Sure. See if we can get any --

STU: Now we're down to 4400.

GLENN: 4400? Okay. Well, we'll try to narrow it down from those 4400 choices.

STU: But where do I get my news that's like two days old?

GLENN: The newspaper. They will be there.

STU: They will be there for me still if I want to hear something that happened?

GLENN: Absolutely they will be there. Nonprofit. They have got to do something. We just can't let these bastions of information, we just can't -- you know, Stu -- Stu, it's like when you think of America, think of colonial America, okay?

STU: I'm thinking of colonial America.

GLENN: You are thinking colonial America?

STU: Uh-huh.

GLENN: I mean, you are thinking of the patriots, right?

STU: Yeah, yeah.

GLENN: You are thinking of George Washington, you are thinking of Benjamin Franklin, you are thinking of all these great people. We didn't just let the tricorner hat go.

STU: No.

GLENN: Of course not. We propped those businesses up. Everybody's like, I don't want a hat with three corners.

STU: Right. Everyone's like, wait a minute, why do I want a hat with three corners, why all of a sudden is it being turned into a charity? We're like, well, it's a three-cornered hat.

GLENN: Hello, it's a three-corner hat. The tricorner hat is a symbol of America. You think George Washington, you know, was just wearing -- he could have worn any hat. He wore that one. Those don't go out of style. And if they go out of business, we would probe --

STU: Right. And it's like right now you can buy a powdered wig without any tax ramifications because it's a charity.

GLENN: It's a charity. You know, we need the tricorner hat and we need the powdered wig. We need them. We need them. I was just saying this to my wife just the other night as we were sitting in our cave.

(Legalzoom.com)

VOICE: Today in the New York Times, President Barack Obama is off and running. We answer the question America most wants to know in an exclusive one-on-one interview: What brand shoe does the president prefer. Plus, Michelle dishes on her favorite appetizers. It's all today in the Times.

GLENN: No, seriously I think we should -- I mean, a lot of these guys wouldn't become a nonprofit because that's the kind of stuff that Americans need to know, you know?

VOICE: Also today in the New York Times, is Chuck Schumer really a superhero. Plus, the best wines for over $700 a bottle. The stories you need today in the Times.

GLENN: See, some people would say they're slanted or they're snobby but I just don't see that from --

VOICE: In today's edition of the New York Times, it's the one thing America doesn't want the terrorists to know, the location or movement of our troops in Iraq or Afghanistan. We've got them all on Page A-2 just beneath the title Betrayal and Adventure today in the Times.

GLENN: See, I think they are providing a service that you just can't get elsewhere.

VOICE: Today in the Times, another day, another debate settled. Global warming, caused by man. Case closed. Pick up a copy of the Times today.

GLENN: What? Case closed.

VOICE: Today in the Times. Debate's over. Israel is wrong. Pick up a copy of the Times today.

GLENN: (Laughing)

When Bevan Cooney — the former "junior" business partner to Hunter Biden and Devon Archer — went to jail in 2019, investigative reporter and New York Times bestselling author Peter Schweizer thought he'd never gain access to the damning emails Cooney had promised. That all changed three weeks ago when Schweizer was given complete access to Cooney's gmail account.

Schweizer joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Tuesday to describe just some of the business deals revealed within these emails — like Hunter working with an alleged Russian criminal and with Chinese communists to secure their assets, or to secure one-on-one time with his dad, then-Vice President Joe Biden. And all of this new information is completely separate from the emails allegedly discovered on Hunter Biden's laptop recently reported by the New York Post.

"So, I want to make this clear. This [Cooney's emails] has nothing to do with what's on the laptop … It didn't come from [Rudy] Giuliani. It didn't come from anybody else, right?" Glenn asked Schweizer.

"That's absolutely correct," Schweizer confirmed.

He briefly explained how Cooney, a former Los Angeles nightclub owner, is currently serving a prison sentence for his involvement in a fraudulent business bond scheme with Biden and Archer. From prison, Cooney gave Schweizer written permission to access his Gmail account.

"This is really important," he noted. "We're not looking at printouts. Not looking at PDFs. We're actually in his Gmail accounts themselves, sifting through these emails. And there's a shocking amount of information about deals involving China, involving Russia, involving all sorts of things they were trying to pull off."

Watch the video below to catch more of the conversation:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The king of "No Spin" and bestselling author of "Killing Crazy Horse," Bill O'Reilly joined Glenn Beck on this week's podcast to talk about the latest developments in Joe Biden's Ukraine and China corruption scandal. Now that some of the details are finally coming out in the open, does the average Democrat care? Maybe, but the Left doesn't seem to.

O'Reilly argued there's more hatred for President Donald Trump now than in 2016, and that some people hate President Trump so much that they'd rather vote for the "senile, corrupt" Joe Biden.

"Hunter got tens of millions of dollars from Ukraine, from Russia, from China because his father was vice president. I have no doubt in my mind," O'Reilly said. "But the hatred for Donald Trump overrides that in the minds of millions of viewers. They're saying, 'You know, we'd rather have the senile corrupt guy than Trump.'"

Asked by Glenn if any other Republican running for president would be met with the same level of vitriol, O'Reilly answered, "The Left is the Left. They don't like America. The want to redo the Constitution. They want to take some of our freedoms, like the Second Amendment and the First Amendment, and change them. And they want to destroy capitalism and replace it with a big centralized government in Washington that controls the economy … but I'm talking about the folks. I have liberal friends and I say to them, 'Do you not understand that when you vote for Biden, you're voting against your own self interest?'"

Watch the video clip from the full podcast below, or find the full episode HERE:

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

In a phone call with his constituents, Senator Ben Sasse (R-Neb) unleashed a torrent of criticisms about President Donald Trump, saying he "flirted with white supremacists," "kisses dictators' butts," and "spends like a drunken sailor."

On the radio program Friday, Glenn said he was disappointed in Sen. Sasse for apparently forgetting all of President Trump's accomplishments. Because, in reality, Trump has accomplished a lot more than many presidents before him.

Then, for anyone who may have forgotten President Trump's achievements — or who simply hate the man so much they've ignored them — Glenn listed just some of the many things this president has achieved during his three and a half years in the White House.

Watch the video below to hear Glenn's message for all the Trump-haters who have forgotten Trump's accomplishments, or you can read Glenn's list HERE:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

President Trump has given us great judges on the lower court, 3 judges far superior than Roberts and other bogus constitutionalists as SCOTUS and one just may turn out to be another Clarence Thomas. He kicked the ass of ISIS and came home.

He got us out of the disastrous Iran deal, killed their head of terror, boxed them in and is currently collapsing their economy while also brokering a Mid East peace deal that everyone said could never happen. He moved our embassy to Jerusalem despite the state department, something no president has done even though they all promised.

Yes, he met with the North Korean Dictator. I hated that, but I also hated the fact that no other president did anything and North Korea kept gaining power. He has gotten Europe to pay their share of NATO, brought the Arabs and the Jews together, while smashing the choke hold of the PLO, and stood up to the Chinese instead of selling them supercomputers (Clinton), accepting lead poison in dog food (Bush), or loving the CCP and taking millions in dirty money (Obama/Biden).

He also has defended religious liberty unlike any other president at least in the last 100 years, and is a true pro-life advocate that unlike most republicans backs it up with action instead of just talk.

President Trump has also opened doors that the GOP was too wussy to even try to open with Hispanics and Blacks. He again didn't pander. He instead cleared the dead wood and opened pathways up so they could get higher education, create jobs, and not get lost in the prison system.

He also has defended religious liberty... and is a true pro-life advocate.

President Trump also took on an economy that had been beaten down, a people who had been told "you didn't build that" and, in fact, Obama and Biden claimed that the economy was "as good as it would ever get," that we would never create jobs in sectors ever again.

President Trump gave us the lowest unemployment rate since 1969 (the year I celebrated my 5th birthday,) the lowest unemployment for Hispanics & Blacks ever, and the first real growth in pay that I can remember.

President Trump then responded to the largest pandemic in 100 years by doing a couple of things I have never seen a president do:

  1. America's biggest capitalist shuts down the entire economy and knowingly puts his re-election at risk in order to save people.
  2. Closes travel with China and Europe, only to be called “racist," "xenophobic" and accused of stirring hatred. Now everyone says they were for it, but he stood alone and took the heat.

When everyone bashed him because they thought he would seize control and become an authoritarian by telling states what to do, or taking control of companies and telling them what to produce, he simply asked the free market to step to the plate, because he trusts the people of this country to do the right thing. By not taking control, he was called a dictator and a Nazi. Meanwhile he has been blamed for the blood bath created by Gov. Cuomo's nursing home policies. They said 2 million would die, best case scenario 200,000 — if we did everything right. Gee, seems that we are now in the time period they told us would be phase two, it seems as though we seem to have hit that "best case scenario" at this point.

While all of this has gone on, President Trump has fought the lies that were started by Hillary Clinton's team to smear him as a Russian operative. It was enabled by the Obama White House and included the DOJ, CIA, Dept of State, FBI, and DNI. Did I leave anyone out? Oh, yeah we are now getting evidence that members of the Pentagon may have been involved as well. Not to mention the so-called "press" and Congress who did things that would embarrass not only "Frank Underwood" but also Kevin Spacey. He has single handedly exposed the press for who they are and have always been. Because of his tweets, personal style and frankly balls of steel, he has exposed those who truly are: "Enemies of the people." I hated that when he first said it, but it is true. Any person or group that knowingly lies to destroy our president, our Constitution and the free market, are not just enemies of the people, they are enemies of the freedom of all mankind.

As someone who didn't support President Trump at first (and that is putting it mildly) I remain honest enough to judge him on his entire record. He is perhaps the only man in America that can and has stood entirely alone, surrounded by enemies, surrounded by those who took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution, who are now actively engaged in destroying it and any elected president who stands in their way.

Personally, I have grown sick and tired of spineless, do nothing, old, corrupt GOP politicians who are either part of the problem or too frightened to stand alone and speak up. The vast majority are all "Sunshine Patriots." History will condemn those who did nothing but complain and whine, while others not only rang the bell, but stood and took the hits, who risked it all and lost money, reputation and perhaps, God forbid, some who gave the ultimate sacrifice to fight the evil that rages so clearly against the light.

100 years from now history will judge all of us. So will our children's children. Most will be forgotten. Those who failed to show up on the battlefield or cower in the trees, will be remembered with shame and disdain. Others like President Trump, I believe will be seen as indispensable.