Glenn


Glenn Beck is seen here on the Insider Webcam, an exclusive feature available only to Glenn Beck Insiders. Learn more...

GLENN: From Radio City in Midtown Manhattan, third most listened to show in all of America. Hello, you sick twisted freak. Welcome to the Glenn Beck program. May name is coincidentally enough Glenn Beck. That's why they hired me for this program. Here is what I I hope you were listening last hour and I said please call all your friends. Make sure they gather around the radio because I, for the first time in I don't know how long, I see an actual light at the end of the tunnel. I'll be real honest with you, and I've never lied to you, but I will be real honest with you. The 9/12 Project was a grasp for me. I know that you are the secret. I know that you are the answer. I know that you are the answer to the economy, you are the answer to the end of corruption. You are the answer. And I'm going to share with you something that I read in this old novel written by one of the chief progressives back in the early 1900s and it says everything. It says why we're in this predicament and it's because too many of us, me included just, you know, they will deal with it; I'm busy; I got other things to do. And I know when you're involved, I know when the American people want to rally and step to the plate and save their country, they will. But quite honestly, you know what, it's like this: I know that there is a politician out there. I knew all last election this is the best we can do? This isn't the best we can do. And then I met Sarah Palin. Oh, my gosh. Now, she may not be the one that should be the president. I don't know. But she gave me great hope that somebody is out there doing it and doing it right and gets it! So I've been trudging along saying, hey, we're going to make it, we're going to make it and we've got to get together. But I hadn't seen the light at the end of the tunnel. I'm beginning to see just tunnel and more tunnel. Where's the light at the end of the tunnel? Where is someone with a torch that says, come on, this way! I just knew we had to stay together. Oh, I am here to tell you I see the light at the end of the tunnel.

Last hour when I started to describe this and said get all your friends together, make sure they are listening to this next hour, it's like a zombie movie. This hour let me tell you that what we're living in right now is the matrix. If you saw the movie The Matrix, what we are living in right now, it doesn't make sense. It doesn't even feel real. It feels like we're watching a movie, and it has for a long time. It's not about Barack Obama. It's about Barack Obama and George Bush and Bill Clinton and George H. W., it's been going on forever. And it doesn't seem right, and we're arguing about things that we shouldn't be arguing about and they just, it's a play, and we are pawns and we've finally gotten to the place now to where we can look at each other and go, oh, my gosh, yeah! We denied it for a long time.

The independents of this country are growing by leaps and bounds. They are growing faster than the Republicans are going down and faster than the Democrats are going down. But you combine how many people are dissatisfied with the Democrats with the number of people who are dissatisfied with the Republicans and you have the going up number of independents. It is like take the red pill or the blue pill. Do you want to live in the matrix? Do you want to keep playing this game, or do you want to wake up knowing that once you wake up, it's going to be a tough battle and it is going to be a battle to the end.

There is software that is running. It is called the progressive, the early 20th century progressive movement. It is software. It is software if I have time later, I have to explain. What I realized last night, finally something else clicked into my mind on the stress test. I know why it happened. I get it now. It's part of this software, and it's creating this illusion. It's why you feel there's no choice, why every time you're electing somebody, you're like, okay, he's better than the other guy. Because there is no real choice! The software has designed these choices for you and it's running a program. It makes you feel like you're in charge, but you're not.

Now, what is going to there are things because what we argue on all the time is what's going to slow this down. Forget about slowing it down. That's where we've been lately: What can slow this down, what can stop this? And the only thing that you keep coming up with, if we're honest with each other, is that at some point this system and our people, our country will be so separate from their government that the people will have to rise up. That's not a good option. I've been warning you on that option. That's a bad, bad option because that leads us to France and the French Revolution: Guillotines, prisons, death, chaos. Bad.

What shuts the matrix off? What is the matrix afraid of? Where is the power source of the matrix? Unplug it. Can we just infect the software? That's one option. Or can we unplug the machine so the whole thing goes... I've told you we've got to start challenging the Constitution. We have to start challenging the government. We have to start saying, "You know what, we're going to adopt a sovereignty clauses in our states." But that was to throw the matrix up against the wall and scare them. It was like I was talking last hour, the zombies: Throw them up against the wall and hold them at bay. Scare them. Thomas Jefferson said a government, where a government is afraid of its people, there is liberty. Where the people are afraid of their government, there is tyranny. So that was, let's throw them against the wall. Instead the people of Montana and the people of Texas and the people of Utah, whoa. Texas and the mountain region and now the people in Tennessee. They've all come to the same conclusion: If we challenge the government on gun laws, specifically in this one way, if we make a gun in Texas and if it's purchased in Texas this is a Montana thing. So I should probably use Montana. If it is made in Montana, purchased in Montana and remains in Montana, there is no reason the federal government should have any regulation on that gun.

Now, that might sound ridiculous, that might sound like another attempt to throw it back, but it's not. This is an attempt to go after something that has been bothering me for about a year because when I saw that FDR you learned in history about court packing, right? FDR wanted to pack the courts. He wanted to put more justices on because he couldn't get his way on something. He then tried to say we should force these people to retire; they're too old. Because he couldn't get his way on something. Then he said, "You know what, these people are bad people and you should rise up against these Supreme Court justices," but it didn't work. It took him ten years to get what he wanted and it was a court case decided in his favor. I think it was 1941 or maybe 1942, about a farmer who just wanted to grow wheat. He was only growing wheat. He was grinding it. His wife was making bread. He wasn't selling it. He was doing it himself. The government made the case that he couldn't do that without federal regulation. It was fought in court. It was finally decided. That one case changed America. When that one case happened, now everything now you had to have certain hour workweek. Now you had to have federal regulations of hourly wages. Now the state could tell every businessman, every farm owner, every individual exactly what to do. Forget about the state. It was the State with a capital S. It changed and buried our Constitution and our founders' dream. What they're doing in Montana is challenging that, in the way that the justices have been waiting.

You've got six justices that don't like that decision. I think it might even be seven that do not like that decision from the 1940s, that think that it was a wrong decision, but they've never been willing to take it on because if they don't take it on on the right case and the people aren't involved, congress will make it worse. This is the case, but it doesn't it cannot just happen in Montana. It has to happen in all of the states, or a lot of them. Because of something called emerging consensus, this is a new thing that the Court loves: "Well, where are the people going." This is why they want the state this is the strategy for gay marriage: Get the states to pass these laws that okay gay marriage, then short circuit the system, get it kicked up to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court is bound to look at emerging consensus and say, "This is where the states are moving; so we've got to do this." That's the new progressive way to do it. Well, if emerging consensus is state rights, specifically and I'll explain later specifically on guns, the matrix is unplugged and the power goes to the states.

I will explain this in the coming days. Next week we'll explain it. We'll explain it in the newsletter which is free. We're going to have some experts write on it. We're going to talk to the people who are doing it, why they're doing it. And on next Friday's show on television, we're going to do a full hour. We're going to assemble those experts. We're going to put them in the studio and we're going to have them explain it and give you a plan of action, but I'm telling you, I think this is one of the reasons why the 9/12 Project was put I knew keep people together, I knew grassroots, network, but somebody else I think has come up with a darn good shot at a solution. And if you look I thought, oh, there's no way. You know, Supreme Court, that's if you read two cases, and we'll get into them next week. If you read two cases, would you have got the four conservative strict constructionalist judges. You know how they're going to vote. You need five. There are two other justices who have ruled on interstate commerce clause and on the on two cases involving interstate commerce, and they have both said, "This law is wrong; it should be overturned, not on this case because it's not the right case and it's not they are reading it wrong, et cetera, et cetera. We want to overturn it. Because the gun is involved, this, America will pay attention because if they lose, now you've got the congress with full control of guns. I think it could be it. I thinking the light at the end of the tunnel. It's a two year process. But this is something that is going to distract the matrix. This is going to the matrix now is going to go, oh, crap, we've got to work on this. Because they will immediately know. I ask myself, why has this not been covered? We've been talking about it all week. Why has no one been covering this? Because they didn't get it. Believe me, this is the path, or at least one of them, and a really good shot, and it's going to be as soon as the progressive movement gets it, they are going to be telling you that there's going to be, you know, child pornography in, you know, Idaho and there's going to be guns that are bazookas and tanks, they are going to say that people are going to be enslaving children to make wooden shoes in Florida, which, maybe that's a problem with wooden shoes, they are just not cheap enough. But it takes the power of the federal government to regulate everything in your life. Dunkin' Donuts may still have to be regulated because of interstate commerce, but if you're a mom and pop store, they ain't got nothing to say about you. You don't like what they're doing in your state, move to another state. The federal government won't tell you what to do. Only your state will. It gives the power back to you. There are some constitutional scholars that believe this would reset it back to Jefferson. I don't happen to believe that. I'd like to get back, I'd like to get back to 1900 and the understanding of the Constitution and the power of the state and stop capitalizing the state when it looks at the federal government. Okay, great stuff. Pass this on. I'm going to have the e mail newsletter for you next week. Start paying attention to those stories in the newsletter. I'm going to not only going to explain it so you can send it to all your friends, but what you need to do is you need to start organizing on this. Pay attention. Learn. We'll help you do all of it. Learn. Get it into your statehouses. You've got if we could have 20 states do exactly what they've done or similar things on guns in their states, an emerging consensus, Montana is ready to short circuit the system. They go on sale in November. They have designed this system to be challenged immediately. On the first day those guns are for sale, they are going to be challenged in the court. There's a good chance it's going to be kicked up, but the Supreme Court doesn't have to take it, unless other states are also being challenged and they are kicked up into all the different circuit courts of appeals and they all start to conflict with each other. The matrix says, "Uh oh," and it has to be answered by the Supreme Court because it will all be in conflict. Risk big, win big. Risk big, lose big. But pray for those Supreme Court justices, that they all eat broccoli, that they all are on a treadmill. God save them until you can get this into court.

This week on the Glenn Beck Podcast, Glenn spoke with Vox co-founder Matthew Yglesias about his new book, "One Billion Americans: The Case for Thinking Bigger."

Matthew and Glenn agree that, while conservatives and liberals may disagree on a lot, we're not as far apart as some make it seem. If we truly want America to continue doing great things, we must spend less time fighting amongst ourselves.

Watch a clip from the full interview with Matthew Yglesias below:


Find the full podcast on Glenn's YouTube channel or on Blaze Media's podcast network.

Want to listen to more Glenn Beck podcasts?

Subscribe to Glenn Beck's channel on YouTube for FREE access to more of his masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, or subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

'A convenient boogeyman for misinformation artists': Why is the New York Times defending George Soros?

Image source: Simon Dawson/Bloomberg via Getty Images

On the "Glenn Beck Radio Program" Tuesday, Glenn discussed the details of a recent New York Times article that claims left-wing billionaire financier George Soros "has become a convenient boogeyman for misinformation artists who have falsely claimed that he funds spontaneous Black Lives Matter protests as well as antifa, the decentralized and largely online, far-left activist network that opposes President Trump."

The Times article followed last week's bizarre Fox News segment in which former House Speaker Newt Gingrich appeared to be censored for criticizing Soros (read more here). The article also labeled Glenn a "conspiracy theorist" for his tweet supporting Gingrich.

Watch the video clip below for details:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The former ambassador to Russia under the Obama Administration, Michael McFaul, came up with "7 Pillars of Color Revolution," a list of seven steps needed to incite the type of revolution used to upend Eastern European countries like Ukraine and Georgia in the past two decades. On his TV special this week, Glenn Beck broke down the seven steps and showed how they're happening right now in America.

Here are McFaul's seven steps:

1. Semi-autocratic regime (not fully autocratic) – provides opportunity to call incumbent leader "fascist"

2. Appearance of unpopular president or incumbent leader

3. United and organized opposition – Antifa, BLM

4. Effective system to convince the public (well before the election) of voter fraud

5. Compliant media to push voter fraud narrative

6. Political opposition organization able to mobilize "thousands to millions in the streets"

7. Division among military and police


Glenn explained each "pillar," offering examples and evidence of how the Obama administration laid out the plan for an Eastern European style revolution in order to completely upend the American system.

Last month, McFaul made a obvious attempt to downplay his "color revolutions" plan with the following tweet:

Two weeks later, he appeared to celebrate step seven of his plan in this now-deleted tweet:



As Glenn explains in this clip, the Obama administration's "7 Pillars of Color Revolution" are all playing out – just weeks before President Donald Trump takes on Democratic candidate Joe Biden in the November election.

Watch the video clip below to hear more from Glenn:


Watch the full special "CIVIL WAR: The Way America Could End in 2020" here.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multiplatform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Start your free trial and get $20 off a one-year subscription with code BANTHIS.

Modern eugenics: Will Christians fight this deadly movement?

Photo by Olga Kononenko on Unsplash

Last month, without much fanfare, a new research paper disclosed that 94 percent of Belgian physicians support the killing of new-born babies after birth if they are diagnosed with a disability.

A shocking revelation indeed that did not receive the attention it demanded. Consider this along with parents who believe that if their unborn babies are pre-diagnosed with a disability, they would choose to abort their child. Upwards of 70 percent of mothers whose children are given a prenatal disability diagnosis, such as Down Syndrome, abort to avoid the possibility of being burdened with caring for a disabled child.

This disdain for the disabled hits close to home for me. In 1997, my family received a letter from Michael Schiavo, the husband of my sister, Terri Schiavo, informing us that he intended to petition a court to withdraw Terri's feeding tube.

For those who do not remember, in 1990, at the age of 26, Terri experienced a still-unexplained collapse while at home with Michael, who subsequently became her legal guardian. Terri required only love and care, food and water via feeding tube since she had difficulty swallowing as a result of her brain injury. Nonetheless, Michael's petition was successful, and Terri's life was intentionally ended in 2005 by depriving her of food and water, causing her to die from dehydration and starvation. It took almost two excruciating weeks.

Prior to my sister's predicament, the biases that existed towards persons with disabilities had been invisible to me. Since then, I have come to learn the dark history of deadly discrimination towards persons with disabilities.

Indeed, some 20 years prior to Germany's T4 eugenics movement, where upwards of 200,000 German citizens were targeted and killed because of their physical or mental disability, the United States was experiencing its own eugenics movement.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas documented some of this history in his concurring opinion in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., Justice Thomas describes how eugenics became part of the academic curriculum being taught in upwards of 400 American universities and colleges.

It was not solely race that was the target of the U.S. eugenics movement. Eugenicists also targeted the institutionalized due to incurable illness, the physically and cognitively disabled, the elderly, and those with medical dependency.

In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down Roe v. Wade, which wiped out pro-life laws in nearly every state and opened the floodgates to abortion throughout the entirety of pregnancy. Since then, 60 million children have been killed. Abortion as we know it today has become a vehicle for a modern-day eugenics program.

Since the Catholic Church was established, the Truth of Christ was the greatest shield against these types of attacks on the human person and the best weapon in the fight for equality and justice. Tragically, however, for several decades, the Church has been infiltrated by modernist clergy, creating disorder and confusion among the laity, perverting the teachings of the Church and pushing a reckless supposed “social justice" agenda.

My family witnessed this firsthand during Terri's case. Church teaching is clear: it is our moral obligation to provide care for the cognitively disabled like Terri. However, Bishop Robert Lynch, who was the bishop of the Diocese of St. Petersburg, Florida, during Terri's case, offered no support and was derelict in his duties during the fight for Terri's life.

Bishop Lynch had an obligation to use his position to protect Terri from the people trying to kill her and to uphold Church teaching. Indeed, it was not only the silence of Bishop Lynch but that of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), which also remained silent despite my family's pleas for help, that contributed to Terri being needlessly starved and dehydrated to death.

My family's experience, sadly, has turned out to be more of the rule than the exception. Consider what happened to Michael Hickson. Hickson was a 36-year-old, brain-injured person admitted to a Texas hospital after contracting COVID-19. Incredibly—and against the wishes of Michael's wife—the hospital decided not to treat Michael because they arbitrarily decided that his “quality of life" was “unacceptably low" due to his pre-existing disability. Michael died within a week once the decision not to treat him was imposed upon him despite the efforts of his wife to obtain basic care for her husband.

During my sister's case and our advocacy work with patients and their families, it would have been helpful to have a unified voice coming from our clergy consistently supporting the lives of our medically vulnerable. We desperately need to see faithful Catholic pastoral witness that confounds the expectations of the elite by pointing to Jesus Christ and the moral law.

A Church that appears more concerned with baptizing the latest social and political movements is a Church that may appear to be “relevant," but one that may also find itself swallowed up by the preoccupations of our time.

As Catholics, we know all too well the reluctance of priests to preach on issues of abortion, euthanasia, assisted suicide, and other pro-life issues. We have heard that the Church cannot risk becoming too political.

At the same time, some within the Church are now openly supporting Black Lives Matter, an organization that openly declares itself hostile to the family, to moral norms as taught by the Church, and whose founders embrace the deadly ideology of Marxism.

For example, Bishop Mark J. Seitz of El Paso, Texas, knelt in prayer with a cardboard sign asserting his support for this ideology.

Recently, during an online liturgy of the mass, Fr. Kenneth Boller at The Church of St. Francis Xavier in New York, led the congregation with what appears to sound like questions affirming the BLM agenda. Moreover, while reading these questions, pictures of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Ahmaud Arbery, assumed victims of racial injustice, were placed on the altar of St. Francis Xavier Church, a place typically reserved for Saints of the Catholic Church.

Contrast these two stories with what happened in the Diocese of Lafayette, Indiana, where Rev. Theodore Rothrock of St. Elizabeth Seton Church fell victim to the ire of Bishop Timothy Doherty. Fr. Rothrock used strong language in his weekly church bulletin criticizing the Black Lives Matter movement and its organizers. Consequently, Bishop Doherty suspended Fr. Rothrock from public ministry.

In 1972, Pope Pius VI said, “The smoke of Satan has entered the temple of God." It seems that too many of our clergy today are enjoying the smell.

I encourage all who are concerned about the human right to life and about Christ-centered reforms in our culture and our Church to raise your voices for pastoral leadership in every area of our shared lives as Christian people.

Bobby Schindler is a Senior Fellow with Americans United for Life, Associate Scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute, and President of the Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network.